Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer

The Role of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Postmastectomy Follow-Up of Primary Breast Cancer and in the Prognostic Evaluation of Disseminated Breast Cancer

Serum levels of carcinoeinbryonic antigen (CEA) were evaluated in 145 patients with breast cancer. There were 107 patients with « indolent » disease: 8 had previous metastases in complete posttherapeutic remission and were CEA-negative; CEA became positive in 2 of 3 of these cases who subsequently relapsed. The other 99 patients were without clinical evidence of disease after mastectomy. Of these, 82 were disease-free and CEA-negative, 2 relapsed and simultaneously became CEA-positive, 4 had recurrences but remained CEA-negative, 4 became CEA-positive but without clinical signs of metastases, and 7 became CEA positive before the clinical-instrumental diagnosis of metastasis. CEA was positive in 23 of 38 patients (60.5 %) with « active » disease. Response to medical therapy occurred in 6.6 % of CEA-negative patients compared to 55.0 % of CEA-positive patients. Among CEA-positive patients, there was a similar percentage of response to medical therapy in patients with small (50.0 %) or large (56.5 %) tumor burden. A response to medical therapy was observed in all patients with a disease-free interval equal to or greater than 24 months and CEA-positive.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in the Follow-Up of Disease-Free Breast Cancer Patients

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays (2536) were performed in 380 disease-free breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy. In the 334 evaluable patients with 3 or more determinations, the overall relapse rate after a median follow-up of 29 months was 11 %. Of 203 patients with normal CEA values, 19 (9.3 %) relapsed. In the 50 patients with the highest CEA value greater than 20 ng/ml, the relapse rate was 26 %; in the 12 patients with gradually increasing CEA elevations it was 50 %. However, CEA was unable to predict recurrence in N- patients. Premastectomy N+ was significantly associated with greater than 20 ng/ml or gradually increasing CEA values, suggesting the lack of an independent prognostic value of CEA in our patient population.

Preliminary Study on Serum Levels of Mucinous like Cancer Antigen (MCA) in Patients with Breast Disease: Comparison with CEA

MCA (mucinous-like cancer antigen) can be measured in the biological fluids of patients by means of a solid phase enzyme immunoassay. This study describes the results of MCA determination in sera of 230 patients with benign (99) and malignant (131) breast diseases. MCA levels were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in non cancer patients and in healthy subjects (p < 0.001). MCA concentrations tended to increase as the stage of the disease advanced. The 95th percentile of MCA value distribution in normal subjects showed a diagnostic sensitivity in breast cancer patients of 16.3% at stage I,26.2% at stages II-III and 52% at stage IV. In a group of 118 cancer patients, MCA and CEA were tested simultaneously. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MCA and CEA assays was very similar; nevertheless the association of the two tests showed 11 cases with high levels of MCA and low levels of CEA and 9 patients with high levels of CEA and low levels of MCA. Seventy-four out of 118 patients were negative for both markers and in 22 out of 118 patients markers were positive. The new marker MCA appeared to correlate with breast cancer and gave different information complementary to CEA.

CEA Determination in the Follow-Up of Extracolorectal Neoplasms

CEA was initially described as a tumor and organ specific colorectal antigen, but later found by more sensitive methods in other tumors (stomach, pancreas, lung, breast) and in minor amounts in inflammatory, normal adult and fetal organs of the gastrointestinal tract. The main clinical application of CEA concerns its pretherapeutic and serial determination as circulating antigen in serum and other body fluids by means of CEA-specific, commercially available test kits. By clinical studies a significant correlation has been proven between the pretherapeutic serum CEA level and tumor stages and prognosis. Moreover, serial CEA level changes have been shown a valuable monitor following operation or during radio/chemotherapy anticipating and reflecting the clinical course of disease. In combination with newly established tumor markers, the main clinical indication for CEA determination in addition to colorectal cancer concerns monitoring of patients with stomach (+ CA 72-4), lung (+ NSE/SCC) and breast cancer (+ CA 15-3/MCA).

Reduced graphene oxide modified smart conducting paper for cancer biosensor

We report results of the studies relating to the fabrication of a paper based sensor comprising of poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (

PEDOT

PSS) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) composite. The effect of various solvents like methanol, ethylene glycol and H2SO4 on the electrical conductivity of

PEDOT

PSS coated Whatman paper has been investigated. The conductivity of this solution processed conducting paper significantly increases from ~1.16×10(-4) S cm(-1) up to ~3.57×10(-2) S cm(-1) (~300 times) on treatment with ethylene glycol. The observed significant increase in electrical conductivity is due to conformational rearrangement in the polymer and is due to strong non-covalent cooperative interaction between PEDOT and the cellulose molecules. Further, incorporation of RGO into the conducting paper results in improved electrochemical performance and signal stability. This paper electrode is a promising alternative over the expensive conventional electrodes (ITO, gold and glassy carbon), that are known to have limited application in smart point-of-care (POC) devices. This low cost, flexible and environment friendly conducting paper based biosensor utilized for cancer biomarker (carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA) detection reveals high sensitivity of 25.8 µA ng(-1) mL cm(-2) in the physiological range, 1-10 ng mL(-1).

Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen (CA 15-3) in bitches with tumours on mammary gland: preliminary report

The aim of this work was to determine levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen (CA 15-3) in the blood serum of 45 bitches. A modified procedure was used to determine the CEA and CA 15-3 markers with the human kits using the radioimmunoassay method. Samples collected from extirpated tumour of mammary glands were histologically processed and classified as per WHO guidelines. The average age of animals with tumour was 10.00 ± 2.2 years; for healthy bitches average age was 4.2 ± 3.2 years. Values of CEA and CA 15-3 were considered positive, if they exceeded 0.23 ng mL(-1) and 7 IU mL(-1) , respectively. Average levels of CEA in the tumour group were 0.25 ± 0.06 versus 0.20 ± 0.03 in healthy bitches (P = 0.0001). The average CA 15-3 value in bitches with tumour was 8.58 ± 1.27 versus 5.14 ± 1.34 in healthy animals (P < 0.0001).

Serum CEA and CA 15-3 as prognostic factors in primary breast cancer

In the present study, we investigated the association of the serum levels of the tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 15-3 with disease free survival and death from disease in 1046 women with breast cancer without metastases at the time of primary diagnosis in relation to age and the established prognostic factors tumour size, lymph node status, histological grading and hormone receptor status. We found that elevated pre-operative serum marker values were correlated with early relapse (cancer antigen 15-3; P=0.0003) and death from disease (carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 15-3; P=0.0001 both) in univariate analyses. By comparing pre- and post-operative values we found a decline in values post-surgery. In those patients where marker levels of carcinoembryonic antigen decreased more than 33%, a significantly higher risk for relapse and death from disease (both P=0.0001) in univariate analyses was observed. In multivariate analysis this decrease of carcinoembryonic antigen proved to be an independent prognostic factor. The results for cancer antigen 15-3 were comparable to carcinoembryonic antigen in univariate analyses but showed no significance in multivariate analysis. In this study the post-operative decrease of the serum tumour marker carcinoembryonic antigen was a strong independent prognostic factor for disease free survival and death from disease in breast cancer patients.

Intraoperative and postoperative kinetics of serum tumor markers in patients with oral carcinoma

PURPOSE

There are no reliable laboratory procedures to monitor intraoperative tumor antigen dispersal in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This study evaluated the use of serologic parameters as perioperative indicators of systemic manifestations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 28 patients, serial measurements of different tumor markers (squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19.9, carcinoma antigen 125) were made preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at short intervals to determine the influence of tumor ablation on the antigen concentration in the serum. A microparticle enzyme immunoassay was used for the serologic analysis.

RESULTS

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen showed elevated serum levels preoperatively, which increased intraoperatively and decreased significantly postoperatively. The serologic examinations in the control group and the other tumor markers showed no correlation with the clinical situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the titer of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in serum has a positive correlation with the tumor burden and the operative trauma in the case of surgery. These results support the value of intraoperative and postoperative serum antigen monitoring.

Serum tumor marker kinetics and the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer

Serum carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA), CA 15-3, and tissue polypeptide antigens (TPA) have been used in monitoring the clinical course of patients with breast cancer. However, recent reports have suggested that the serial levels of these markers during therapy do not always correlate with the response to therapy. To clarify the usefulness of the serial combination assay of these markers in monitoring the clinical course of patients during therapy, we investigated the relationship between the initial changes and the kinetic patterns of the markers after therapy and the objective responses. When an increase or decrease of over 20% in these markers is taken to be significant, then the initial changes in all three markers significantly correlated with the therapeutic responses (P < 0.01). Five distinct kinetic patterns in the marker levels were observed. A paradoxical kinetic pattern of CEA and CA 15-3 levels--that is, an "initial surge and subsequent drop"--was seen in one-third of the responders. The TPA levels tended to exhibit a "steady decline" pattern in those responders. The sensitivity and specificity of the kinetic patterns to predict the clinical courses were significantly higher than those obtained from the analysis of initial changes. These findings thus suggest that adequate knowledge of the unique kinetics of each marker may help to make a more accurate prediction of the therapeutic responses.

Determination of placental ferritin-positive peripheral lymphocytes in early stages of breast cancer

"Ferritin-blocked lymphocytes" or placental ferritin (PLF) -positive T cells have repeatedly been described in the circulation of patients with female breast cancer. Since a monoclonal antibody directed against PLF became available, a study was performed to evaluate its usefulness in an easily reproducible system. One hundred patients with controversial or highly suspicious findings on mammography who subsequently underwent operation entered this trial. Sixty-one healthy blood donors served as controls. Patients with early (lymph-node negative) stages of breast cancer (in situ and T1N0 tumors) revealed significantly higher numbers of PLF-positive cells (9.00% +/- 4.5% and 6.21% +/- 3.4%) as compared with controls or patients with benign lumps (p < 0.001). Patients with negative lymph nodes differed significantly from node-positive patients (9.79% versus 2.55%; p < 0.001), whereas no difference as related to menopausal and estrogen-receptor status was observed. In order to define the sensitivity and specificity of this test, we analyzed four different cutoff levels (3%, 4%, 5%, and 6% of PLF-positive T cells). At a level of PLF-positive lymphocyte cells of 4%, 94% of cancer patients with stage T1N0 disease or ductal carcinoma in situ, 5% of patients with benign lumps, and 7% of healthy controls were identified. Furthermore, 88% of all lymph node-negative cancer patients had more than 4% positive cells, compared with only 25% in patients with axillary node involvement. The fact that more than 90% of all patients with in situ carcinomas and patients with stage T1N0 cancer had values above 4% offers promising aspects for this method to be used to complement mammography in the early detection of breast cancer.

CA 15.3 determination in patients with breast cancer: clinical utility for the detection of distant metastases

In 81 healthy women, 26 pregnant women, 25 patients with fibrocystic disease and 144 breast cancer patients, the overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the CA 15.3 test was 27 and 97%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 93 and 43%. In 150 node-negative patients taking part in a chemoprevention trial CA 15.3 was assayed at baseline and every 4 months for a median follow-up of 24 months (range 4-48). In these patients, 5 had local recurrences, 1 had a regional recurrence, 9 had distant metastases and 3 developed cancer in the contralateral breast. Among the patients with recurrences, those with distant metastases showed the highest ratio of CA 15.3 increase (8/9); in local and regional recurrences, this ratio was lower (2/6). The patients with contralateral breast cancer had no significant increase in CA 15.3. Patients in whom metastases were detected showed an increase in CA 15.3 4-48 months before clinical or instrumental detection of the metastases.

Clinical use of tumor markers in oncology

The perfect tumor marker would be one that was produced solely by a tumor and secreted in measurable amounts into body fluids, it should be present only in the presence of cancer, it should identify cancer before it has spread beyond a localized site (i.e., be useful in screening), its quantitative amount in bodily fluids should reflect the bulk of tumor, and the level of the marker should reflect responses to treatment and progressive disease. Unfortunately, no such marker currently exists, although a number of useful but imperfect markers are available. The predominant contemporary markers are discussed here by chemical class, as follows: glycoprotein markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and prostate specific antigen (PSA); mucinous glycoproteins, including CA 15-3, CA 19-9, mucinous-like cancer antigen and associated antigens, and CA 125; enzymes, including prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), and placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP); hormones and related endocrine molecules, including calcitonin, thyroglobulin, and catecholamines; and, molecules of the immune system, including immunoglobulins and beta-2-microglobulin. The biologic properties of each group of tumor markers are discussed, along with our assessment of their role in clinical medicine today.

The value of the tumor marker CA 15-3 in diagnosing and monitoring breast cancer. A comparative study with carcinoembryonic antigen

To estimate the utility of the tumor-associated antigen CA 15-3 in the diagnosis of patients with breast cancer, this tumor marker was measured preoperatively in 1342 patients. This group included 509 patients with malignant disease (134 breast cancer patients and 375 patients with other malignancies not involving the breast) and 833 patients with benign surgical diseases (95 patients with fibroadenoma of the breast and 738 patients with other benign diseases). The results were compared with those obtained for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The CA 15-3 level was above normal (25 U/ml) in 31% of the patients with breast cancer, in 22% of patients with other malignancies, and in 9% of patients with benign diseases. The CEA level was elevated in 26% of patients with breast cancer (more than 3 ng/ml). There was a good correlation of CA 15-3 levels with the tumor stage of breast cancer. Both CA 15-3 and CEA also were determined in 671 patients who had received initial curative surgery of breast cancer and who regularly attended our follow-up clinic. The CA 15-3 was found to be more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrences of breast cancer. In the postcare period, carcinoma recurred in 205 patients. Of these, 73% had CA 15-3 concentrations above 25 U/ml; only 50% had CEA values above 3 ng/ml (P less than 0.0001). Although neither CA 15-3 nor CEA were sensitive enough for the screening and diagnosis of early breast cancer, CA 15-3 was significantly better than CEA in the detection of breast cancer metastases.

CEA in tumors of other than colorectal origin

Carcinoembryonic antigen has been demonstrated to be a valuable clinical aid in the management of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Its elevation in the serum prior to evidence of clinical recurrence in up to 80% of patients highlights its utility. CEA has also been found to be elevated in the serum of patients with other epithelial malignancies, but these have not been as well studied as has colorectal carcinoma. In patients with breast cancer CEA elevations may be found in 40-73% of patients presenting with disease in stages I-IV. In addition, 80% of patients will have a CEA elevation 3-10 months prior to clinical symptoms of recurrence. Seventy-seven percent of patients with bronchogenic lung cancer will have an elevated preoperative value. However, cigarette smoking also causes an increase in the CEA assay level and, thus, differentiation between benign and malignant conditions is more difficult. In small cell carcinoma of the lung, CEA assay levels above 10 ng/ml correlate highly with metastatic disease, while values less than 2.5 ng/ml correlate with localized disease. Pancreatic and gastric malignancies demonstrate CEA level elevations in just over 50% of cases. But these, however, have not been clinically useful. Epithelial neoplasms of the female reproductive tract (cervix, uterus, and ovary) also produce CEA in 47-75% of cases and may correlate with stage of disease at diagnosis and level of cellular differentiation. CEA assay levels are elevated in a variety of tumors and correlate with tumor stage, degree of differentiation, and effectiveness of therapy; they may also be the earliest marker of recurrence.

Serum CA 12-5 concentrations and CA 12-5/CEA ratios in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

In attempts to increase the specificity of the CA 12-5 test the ratio of CA 12-5 and CEA concentrations has been determined in 155 cancer patients, all of whom had an increased serum CA 12-5. The patients included 47 with epithelial ovarian cancer, 38 with colorectal cancer, 24 with cervical cancer, 20 with lung cancer, 17 with gastric cancer, and 9 with pancreatic cancer. The CA 12-5/CEA ratio in serum of patients with ovarian cancer ranged from 30 to 920 (mean 251), whereas in other types of cancer the highest ratio was 240 and the mean was 13. All 47 patients with ovarian cancer, but only 7 of the 108 patients with other types of cancer, showed a CA 12-5/CEA ratio greater than 25. About 10% of the patients with gastric or colorectal cancer but none of those with other types of cancer showed an increased ratio. As the predictive value of a CA 12-5/CEA ratio of less than 25 excluding ovarian cancer is 100%, we recommend measuring the CEA concentration in all those with increased CA 12-5 and calculation of the CA 12-5/CEA ratio.

Serum sialic acid and carcinoembryonic levels in the detection and monitoring of colorectal cancer

Total sialic acid (TSA), total protein (TP), TSA normalized to total TP (TSA/TP), and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were determined in 146 consecutive colorectal patients. These results were compared with results from 73 people with nonmalignant gastrointestinal disease, and with results from 96 normal controls. All malignancies were staged according to the Astler-Coller modification of Dukes' classification for colorectal cancer. All blood samples were drawn before surgical therapy. The TSA/TP ratio for colorectal cancer was 13.4 (mg/gm) in contrast to 12.1 (mg/gm) for pathologic controls, and 9.7 (mg/gm) for normal controls. Student's t test showed a P value less than 0.001 for normal controls and a P value less than 0.001 for pathologic controls. The TSA/TP also showed statistical significance in Dukes A, B2, C, and D subgroups when compared with normal controls. There were only four patients with stage C1 carcinoma, thus statistical analysis would be questionable. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen levels showed no significant elevations until Dukes C2 tumors were encountered. These preliminary findings suggest that TSA/TP ratio may detect colorectal cancer patients with less tumor burden and be more beneficial as a tumor marker than CEA for monitoring patients with colorectal cancer.

Serum tumor markers of head and neck cancer: current status

The serum level of a variety of substances shows significant changes in head and neck cancer patients. Such substances are collectively called biochemical tumor markers. To date, most markers lack a high degree of specificity and sensitivity. However, serial measurement of markers showing elevated pretreatment levels may help in monitoring response to therapy. Other potential uses of tumor markers include earlier detection of recurrence and/or metastasis, and possible prediction of prognosis. Measurement of more than one marker seems to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the test. Some markers show significant correlations with various immune parameters in head and neck cancer patients and may have a possible role in potentiating the immunodepressed status of such patients. A review of currently reported tumor markers in head and neck cancer showing their nature, sources, uses, and limitations is presented.

A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients

Breast cancer patients (n = 224) aged 28 to 81 were postoperatively followed up with serial determinations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), and urinary hydroxyproline (OHP). The clinical usefulness of these tumor markers to diagnose and monitor distant metastases was compared with that of the imaging techniques commonly used to monitor breast cancer patients (bone scanning [BS], liver echography [LE], chest radiograph, and skeletal radiograph). So far, 23 patients withdrew from the study, and distant metastases occurred in 33 patients. In 91% of the metastatic patients, constant elevation or progressive increase in serum CEA and/or TPA levels were the first pathologic findings of the relapse. Of the remaining 168 nonrelapsed patients, 122 were followed up longer than 24 months (43 +/- 17 months; mean +/- SD). In these 122 patients the false-positive results of CEA, TPA, and OHP were 0.8%, 2.4%, and 0%, respectively, when used simultaneously with clinical examination and the common laboratory examinations. BS and LE are the only imaging techniques that showed such a high sensitivity to be suitable in the postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, because BS has a low specificity and is not harmless, it should be performed at longer intervals than tumor markers. Eventually, in the relapsed patients, TPA and OHP well reflected the response to treatment better than CEA and prevented useless radiologic examinations.

The role of serum CEA as a prognostic indicator in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values in 529 patients treated in two consecutive adjuvant chemotherapy protocols were analyzed to determine if CEA values correlated with disease-free status or prognostic utility. CEA values were evaluated preoperatively, before chemotherapy, at the conclusion of chemotherapy, and during postchemotherapy followup. The sensitivity of CEA for predicting disease recurrence was low; however, any abnormal CEA at the conclusion of chemotherapy and during followup significantly correlated with reduced disease-free and overall survival. A CEA value greater than or equal to 20 ng/ml at the end of chemotherapy or during followup was highly specific and a strongly positive predictor for the presence of metastases. Abnormal CEA values before chemotherapy that became normal at the conclusion of chemotherapy were associated with a significantly reduced recurrence rate. An abnormal CEA value obtained before or after adjuvant chemotherapy is clinically useful and can provide prognostic information.

Increased serum concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides in the progression of breast cancer

The course of serum concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides was investigated in patients with advanced breast cancer. The patients studied were divided into two groups according to their clinical status: group-I consisted of 51 patients who already had metastases at the start of the investigation, but progressed further during the time of observation; group-II consisted of 14 patients in remission who experienced recurrence of disease while under observation. In group-I, 28 patients (54.9%) were found to have normal serum triglyceride levels at the beginning of the observation period; 22 patients (78.6%) from this group experienced a significant (P less than 0.0001) increase above the normal range upon further disease progression. Similarly, serum cholesterol levels were normal in 32 patients (62.8%) at the start of the investigation, but increased significantly (P less than 0.0001) above the normal range upon disease progression. In group-II, 8 patients (57.2%) had normal serum triglyceride levels at the beginning of the observation period, but the levels increased in 4 patients (50%) significantly (P less than 0.005) upon the occurrence of metastases. Within the same group, a significant increase (P less than 0.001) of initially normal serum cholesterol levels was found in 4 (44.9%) out of 9 patients. In summary, a rise in serum levels of triglycerides and/or cholesterol should receive increased attention and could indicate progression or recurrence of breast cancer.

Tumor markers in mammary carcinoma. An evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen, placental alkaline phosphatase, pseudouridine and CA-50

In 104 patients with breast cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) and the carbohydrate antigen CA-50 were analysed in serum. Excretion of the modified nucleoside, pseudouridine, was analysed in urine. The patients were subdivided in three different clinical stages according to disease manifestations. Levels of CEA and pseudouridine correlated to clinical stage and 58 per cent of the patients with distant metastases had elevated levels of CEA, compared with 36 per cent for pseudouridine. For PLAP and CA-50, the levels did not show any clear correlation to clinical stage. Increased activity of PLAP correlated strongly to tobacco smoking. A decrease in the level of CEA was observed following radical mastectomy. Increase in CEA levels predicted relapse in 5 out of 14 patients within about 3 to 6 months. In patients with tumor manifestations, elevated CEA levels predicted an inferior prognosis compared to those with ordinary levels.

Determination of DNA synthesis, estrogen receptors, and carcinoembryonic antigen in isolated cellular subpopulations of human breast cancer

Primary breast adenocarcinomas obtained from ten patients were enzymatically digested using collagenase (1 mg/ml), hyaluronidase (1 mg/ml), elastase (0.1 mg/ml) and DNAse (0.2 mg/ml). The tumor cells were labeled with 3H-thymidine and, in some cases, with 3H-estradiol. The isolated cells were submitted successively to a Ficoll-Hypaque and a bovine serum albumin gradient, from which 12 fractions were obtained. In each fraction, several characteristics were determined: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), thymidine (dThd) incorporation, and estrogen receptors (ER). Three main cellular subpopulations were characterized: An intermediate density subpopulation (1.046-1.054 g/ml), in which the proliferating cells are concentrated. In this subpopulation a small number of CEA-positive cells are present, but ER containing cells are virtually absent. A high-density, small cell subpopulation that concentrates most of the ER-containing cells. This subpopulation lacks proliferating cells, but CEA-containing cells are abundant. A low-density subpopulation, lacking proliferating cells and with scarce ER-positive cells, although CEA-positive cells are frequent. These findings strongly suggest that proliferating cells lack ER.

Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer. Clinical review

Carcinoembryonic antigen is widely used as a tumor marker for gastrointestinal neoplasms. Its role in the management of other tumors is poorly defined. This review considers the place of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in the management of breast cancer and concludes that sufficient data exist to support its use in clinical practice. Of the many potential uses, the major role for carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in breast cancer is in following patients with advanced disease, especially patients with bone metastases.

Monitoring serum CEA in women with primary breast tumours positive for oestrogen receptor and with spread to lymph nodes

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations (serum CEA) in 80 patients with primary breast cancer were measured preoperatively, one month after operation, and thereafter serially every third month. These data were related to histological and morphometric features of the primary breast carcinoma and the lymph node metastases and to clinical follow up data. Analysis of the serum CEA values showed significant correlations with size of tumour, the presence of lymph node metastases, oestrogen receptor, and occurrence of distant metastases. Furthermore, the results indicated that serial determination of serum CEA in the first two years after operation may be useful in monitoring for the occurrence of distant metastases in patients with metastatic spread to lymph nodes and with large (greater than or equal to 2 cm) primary breast tumours positive for oestrogen receptor. In agreement with other studies, however, it was found that the predictive value of serum CEA concentrations in general is weak and costs may prohibit the implementation of the routine assessment of CEA concentrations.

Tumor markers: value and limitations in the management of cancer patients

Sixteen tumor markers are reviewed, and measured to the ideal: produced by the tumor cell alone absent in health and in benign disease present in all patients with a given malignancy level in the blood representative of tumor mass detectable in occult disease. The only marker that approaches the ideal is human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in gestational trophoblastic tumors. In this malignancy, the HCG level suggests the diagnosis and stage, confirms response to therapy, and predicts relapse. The three most widely used and intensely studied tumor markers are carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alphafetoprotein (AFP), and HCG. CEA cannot be used in screening for cancer, but in carcinoma of the colon its elevation preoperatively increases the likelihood of advanced disease and postoperative recurrence. Postoperatively, elevated titers are often but not invariably associated with recurrent disease. AFP and HCG are useful in the management of nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. Like CEA, they cannot be used for screening. They are more likely to be increased with advancing stage, and after therapy rising levels almost always mean recurrent disease. Some markers are valuable in specific circumstances, such as calcitonin in screening for familial medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. In multiple myeloma, immunoglobulins are useful in determining the tumor mass and response to therapy. In neuroblastoma, catecholamine metabolites are useful primarily in making the diagnosis. In some malignancies, the absence of effective therapy lowers the value of the marker, as for AFP in hepatoma. The remaining markers are too unreliable or too little studied to be useful in the management of an individual patient with cancer. The purpose of this paper is to provide the clinician with an understanding of the limitations of the present tumor markers that will lead to wiser use of the tests, and to provide standards to which future tumor markers should be measured.

Carcinoembryonic antigen and steroid receptors in the cytosol of carcinoma of the breast. Relationship to pathologic and clinical features

Cytosols of 159 primary breast carcinomas were assayed for estrogen and progesterone receptors and 60 of these for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The relationships of pathologic and clinical features previously shown to be of prognostic significance and the biochemical parameter measured were examined. It was found that degree of histologic differentiation was significantly related to receptor status. There were significant inverse relationships between estrogen receptor and lymphocytic infiltrate as well as tumor necrosis. Relationships between estrogen, but not progesterone, receptor and patient age, menstrual status, and race existed. Cytosol CEA, on the other hand, related only to pathologic stage and not to histologic differentiation and other pathologic variables. Therefore, steroid receptors and CEA appear to provide information about different biologic characteristics of a carcinoma. Furthermore, the information provided by CEA appears to be independent of many known pathologic, clinical, and biochemical prognostic indicators.

Role of carcinoembryonic antigen assay in the management of cancer

CEA is a molecule produced by a large number of malignant and benign tissues. Measuring levels of CEA circulating in the blood by radioimmunoassay can be used in the management of cancer patients. Because of high false positive and false negative percentages in normal populations, it has not been useful in screening for malignancy. However, in several types of cancer patients the test has been shown to be of considerable clinical value. Elevated CEA levels indicate a poor prognosis in patients with primary colorectal cancer, primary pancreatic cancer, primary breast cancer, and primary lung cancer. Serial CEA titers obtained following cancer treatments can be used to monitor the therapy. CEA can assess the adequacy of surgical removal of a primary colon or rectal cancer, monitor responses to chemotherapy, and assess response to radiation therapy. The greatest clinical impact of CEA has been in the detection of recurrent colon or rectal cancer following surgical resection of the primary malignancy. Early detection of recurrence, when combined with reoperative second-look surgery, may result in 30% long-term survivors.

Biological markers for breast carcinoma

During the last decade, there has been an intense search for biological markers for breast carcinoma. Many different types of materials have been found that may be elevated in the body fluids of patients with this disease. However, no markers specific for breast cancer have been discovered and those currently available lack the sensitivity and specificity for early detection of the disease or for determining when the tumor burden is low. Problems may also occur in the interpretation of marker data due to apparent biological variations in synthesis or secretion. Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), elevated in 60%-70% of patients with metastases, has had the most extensive evaluation. For the latter patients with increased plasma CEA, the levels in general are proportional to tumor burden. Changes in level with therapy correlate with measurable clinical parameters of response or progression in the majority of these patients. Specific patterns of serial CEA measurements after mastectomy may be helpful for predicting those patients most likely to develop recurrent disease. More recent attention has focused on trials of combinations of markers and on tissue measurement. The search for a specific marker for breast cancer using monoclonal antibody techniques is a promising area of considerable research interest.

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis and prognosis of women with breast cancer

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been measured in 628 patients before and 577 patients after treatment for breast cancer. These came from an unselected sequence of 730 women, subsequently diagnosed as having stage I or II breast cancer, referred to Guy's Hospital over a period of nearly 5 yr. CEA was also measured in serum from 238 ostensibly healthy volunteers and 65 women with benign breast disease. CEA measurements were of no diagnostic value. There were more patients with breast cancer with values in excess of 10 ng/ml measured preoperatively (7%) or after mastectomy (5%) than in controls (3%), but the difference is of marginal significance. High levels of CEA were not consistently associated with pathological stage or histological grade. Mastectomy was not associated with any significant change in the distribution of CEA levels. Patients with stage II disease and pre-operative CEA levels over 10 ng/ml has a faster recurrence rate than those with levels of less than 2.5 ng/ml. High levels were also associated with reduced survival. However, such patients comprised about 5% of women presenting with early breast cancer, so that the use of CEA measurements for prognosis is of limited value.

Tissue and plasma carcinoembryonic antigen in early breast cancer. A prognostic factor

A prospective study of plasma and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen (P-CEA and T-CEA) levels in 63 patients with early (Stage I and II) breast cancer was undertaken to determine if the presence of CEA in tissue and/or plasma at the time of primary surgery can be used as a prognostic factor. Thirty-two Stage I and 31 Stage II patients were evaluable with a median follow-up time of 26 months: 29/63 were T-CEA and/or P-CEA positive while 34/63 were T-CEA and P-CEA negative; 9/63 were both T-CEA and P-CEA positive; 13/63 were P-CEA positive alone, while 25/63 were T-CEA positive alone; 5/29 T-CEA and/or P-CEA positive showed disease progression with a mean DFI of 11.8 months, compared with 0/34 T-CEA and P-CEA negative patients (P less than 0.02); 2/9 T-CEA and P-CEA positive compared with 0/34 negative patients progressed (P less than 0.01). There was a significant difference (P less than 0.05) between P-CEA positive (3/13) patients with recurrence and P-CEA negative (2/50). When T-CEA positive patients (4/25) were compared with T-CEA negative (1/38), the difference approaches significance. When the recurrences were analyzed with respect to CEA, estrogen receptor (ER) and nodal status, only in the CEA + versus CEA - group was there a significant difference. The early data show that patients with positive T-CEA and/or P-CEA have a higher recurrence rate with probable poor prognosis. Prognosis correlates better with CEA status than with ER or nodal status.

The detection and evaluation of human tumor metastases

Many biochemical indices are purported to have clinical utility in the detection and management of neoplasia. Experience gained during the past decade tends to indicate their having a more important role in the detection and monitoring of metastases than of the primary lesion. From this present review of some of the commoner human tumours, it is concluded that such marker substances are important adjuncts in the management of germ cell and certain endocrine and endocrine-related tumours. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) provides a marker for many gastrointestinal cancers, but there are no presently available substances with clinical usefulness for either breast or lung neoplasms. Alternative approaches to the detection of metastases are also presented. The particular use of antibody probes at an immunohistochemical level has been claimed to be able to detect micrometastastic disease in bone marrow or tumour-related monoclonal antibody probes may have application to other cancers in the future.

Carcinoembryonic antigen as a monitor of recurrent breast cancer

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test was performed at the time of diagnosis in 136 patients with early operable breast carcinoma (stage I = 65, stage II = 71). Only 4% had CEA levels greater than 5 ng/ml. Patients with axillary metastasis (stage II) had higher incidence of abnormal CEAs than those with disease localized to the breast (stage I). Follow-up CEA tests were performed on 243 patients after mastectomy. In this group, 50 patients developed recurrent disease and 48% had elevated CEA levels. Patients with chest-wall recurrences rarely had abnormal CEAs, while those with visceral metastasis had higher levels. Among the 193 patients known to be without recurrence, 10% also had elevated CEAs. Excluding inflammatory, hepatic, and renal diseases, the most common medical conditions which could explain such false elevations are diabetes, hypertension, and organic heart disease.

Quantitation of response to therapy in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma by serial analysis of plasma gross cystic disease fluid protein and carcinoembryonic antigen

The maximum percent change (MPC) of plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and gross cystic disease fluid protein (CDP) were correlated with response to therapy in 92 metastatic breast carcinoma patients. In patients treated with hormone therapy MPC values were significantly different between patients with disease progression (Prog) and regression (Reg): MPC-CEA for Reg = -72 +/- 7%, for Prog = 396 +/- 150%; MPC-CDP for Reg = -86 +/- 6%, for Prog = 702 +/- 330%, P less than 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA for CEA and CDP. Similar differences were noted in patients treated with chemotherapy. Decreased (greater than 50%) plasma CEA levels were observed in 24/29 (83%) of Reg, 18/35 (51%) stable and 0/49 (0%) of Prog; decreased (greater than 50%) plasma CDP levels were noted in 19/24 (79%) of Reg, 21/28 (75%) of stable and 2/35 (6%) of Prog. Patients with plasma marker decreases greater than 50% had significantly longer responses to therapy (14.2 months for CEA, 14.1 months for CDP) compared to patients with less than 20% decrease (2.0 months for CEA, 0.8 months for CDP), P less than 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA. Decreasing marker levels during the initial six weeks of therapy (negative slope) accurately identified Reg or stable patients: the predictive value of a negative slope was 92% for CEA and 86% for CDP. Rising marker values correctly identified treatment failures (Prog): the predictive value of a positive slope was 90% for CEA and 76% for CDP. These data indicated that changes in plasma CEA and CDP levels reflected increasing or decreasing tumor burden during hormone or chemotherapy treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Criteria have been established to predict therapeutic outcome based on the slope of CEA or CDP after six weeks of treatment.U

Usefulness of clinical chemistry measurements in classifying patients with breast cancer

Laboratory measurements can be used to detect, classify, and monitor patients with breast cancer. This review covers in detail the clinical usefulness of carcino embryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, various glycoproteins, pregnancy-associated proteins, casein, lactalbumin, beta-2-microglobulin, ferritin, immunoglobins, acute phase proteins, placental-like alkaline phosphatase, liver-associated enzymes, glycosyltransferases, human chorionic gonadotropin, calcitonin, polyamines, and collagen breakdown products, in relationship to their diagnostic utility in patients suspected of having or known to have breast cancer. In addition, these authors assess the merits of various multivariate techniques using a number of clinical chemistry quantities in the same regard. Finally, the relative contribution of biochemical tests vs. the information values gained from "surgical pathology" data (number of positive nodes, number of negative nodes, and degree of anaplasia) is discussed.

Significance of serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen, ferritin, and calcitonin in breast cancer

Serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), ferritin, and calcitonin were measured in 107 patients with breast cancer, 80 of whom had overt or occult metastatic disease. CEA and ferritin values were statistically higher in those patients with metastases. In contrast, there was no correlation between calcitonin concentrations and the stage of the disease. All 27 subjects with CEA concentrations greater than 80 microgram/liter and 32 of 40 with values between 41-80 microgram/liter had metastatic disease. Ferritin was a definite but less sensitive discriminator, with metastatic disease present in all nine patients having concentrations greater than 400 microgram/liter. Such metastases were invariably hepatic. When the two measurements were used as a combined discriminant, the diagnostic accuracy increased somewhat. All 32 patients with CEA concentration greater than microgram/liter and/or a ferritin concentration greater than 400 microgram/liter had metastatic disease; the same was true for 32 of the 42 subjects with CEA concentration between 41-80 microgram/liter and/or a ferritin concentration between 200-400 microgram/liter. The measurements had prognostic value, both when assessed alone and together, with a median survival from the time of study significantly shorter in those with the highest values.

Comparison of serum beta 2-microglobulin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the follow-up of breast cancer patients

Using commercially available radioimmune test kits, serial determinations of serum beta 2-microglobulin and CEA were performed in 337 patients, who had been treated for breast cancer by modified radical mastectomy and radiotherapy. The pre-therapeutic data indicated a higher incidence of pathological beta 2-microglobulin and CEA levels in patients with distant metastases than in patients with localized disease. However, this finding did not allow the conclusion of a direct complementarity of beta 2-microglobulin and CEA as tumour markers, since the group of patients with distant metastasis contained a high percentage of elderly patients who generally can be expected to have elevated beta 2-microglobulin serum concentrations. Therefore, the correlation of the clinical course of malignant disease and the incidence of relapses with the changes of serum beta 2-microglobulin and CEA concentrations was examined during the post-treatment surveillance: 7/9 cases (78%) with local recurrence and 46/73 cases (63%) with distant spread of disease were not indicated in the beta 2-microglobulin follow-up by pathologic serum concentrations, whereas in the CEA follow-up only 1/9 and 2/73 false negative indications were registered. The poor correlation suggests that serum beta 2-microglobulin is not directly tumour associated in breast cancer and does not fulfill the criteria of a tumour marker.

Biological markers in breast carcinoma--clinical correlations with pseudouridine, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, and 1-methylinosine

Urinary levels of the minor nucleosides, pseudouridine (psi),N2, N2-dimethylguanosine (m22G), and 1-methylinosine (m1I), were investigated in patients with breast carcinoma. Elevated levels of psi were observed in 27/131 (20.6%) patients with metastatic disease, 1/14 (7.1%) preoperative patients, and 1/28 (3.6%) postoperative N+ patients. Elevated levels of m22G and M1I were observed, respectively, in 46/131 (35.1%) and 274131 (20.6%) patients with metastatic disease, 3/14 (21.4%) and 3/14 preoperative patients, and 6/28 (21.4%) and 2/28 (7.1%) postoperative N+ patients. There was no correlation between nucleoside levels and involvement of specific organ sites with metastatic disease, nor with chemotherapy response rate or time to treatment failure. During the treatment of metastatic disease there was a tendency for elevated pretherapy psi levels to decrease with attainment of a response and, if the levels subsequently rose to be associated with treatment failure. However, increasing levels of m22G and 71I occurred with both response and disease progression. These results suggest that routine measurement of the level of the urinary nucleosides would be of limited value for following the disease course in patients with breast cancer.