Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone (CMFP) or CMFP plus tamoxifen compared with CMF for premenopausal breast cancer patients. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial

Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea and Its Prognostic Significance in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Objective

Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) is one of the most common side effects in premenopausal patients with breast cancer, and several factors may contribute to the incidence of CIA. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize clinical risk factors associated with CIA incidence and to evaluate their prognostic effects in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

Three electronic databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE) were systematically searched for articles published up to October 2021. The articles included clinical trials that evaluated risk factors associated with CIA and their prognostic value in treatment. For the meta-analysis, pooled odds ratio estimates (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the inverse variance-weighted approach, in addition to publication bias and the chi-square test.

Results

A total of 68 studies involving 26,585 patients with breast cancer were included in this meta-analysis, and 16,927 patients developed CIA. From the 68 studies, 7 risk factors were included such as age group, hormone receptor (HR) status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, tamoxifen administration, chemotherapeutic regimen, and tumor stage. Based on our results, patients with age of ≤40, HR-negative status, ER-negative status, PR-negative status, no use of tamoxifen, and use of anthracycline-based regimen (A) compared with anthracycline-taxane-based regimen (A+T) were associated with less incidence of CIA in patients with breast cancer. Moreover, CIA was associated with favorable disease-free survival (OR = 0.595, 95% CI = 0.537 to 0.658, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OR = 0.547, 95% CI = 0.454–0.660, p < 0.001) in premenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Conclusion

Age, HR status, ER status, PR status, tamoxifen administration, and chemotherapeutic regimen can be considered independent factors to predict the occurrence of CIA. CIA is a favorable prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. CIA should be a trade-off in the clinical management of premenopausal patients with breast cancer, and further large cohort studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Today's Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Who Should Receive What?

Breast cancer remains a major public health problem. Prospective randomized trials comparing therapies are essential to improve current therapy but, for those women unable or unwilling to participate in clinical trials, treatment plans are needed. Treatment recommendations can be based on available information from individual trials and from a large collaborative overview. This information will be reviewed with treatment recommendations presented for subpopulations of breast cancer patients.

Effect of glucocorticoid use on survival in patients with stage I-III breast cancer

PURPOSE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in breast cancer patients to ameliorate emesis induced by chemotherapy. Some preclinical studies have suggested that systemic GCs might promote survival of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer cells. This study aims to clarify their clinical effect on patient survival.

METHODS

A total of 18,596 women with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer in 2002-2006 were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Database and drug treatment was examined from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Claims Database. Of these, 3989 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (non-chemotherapy cohort) and 3237 patients who received six cycles of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (anthracycline cohort) were included. The impact of GC use on survival was analyzed separately in these two cohorts using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In the non-chemotherapy cohort, GC use was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features of breast cancer. High-dose GC was associated with shorter overall survival in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. In the anthracycline cohort, multivariate analysis showed that GC use at each dose level was significantly associated with longer breast cancer-specific survival (HR 0.65, 0.70, and 0.70 for low-dose, median-dose, and high-dose GC, respectively) and overall survival (HR 0.72, 0.76, and 0.73, respectively) when compared with those receiving no GC. The associations were significant in both ER-positive and ER-negative subgroups for breast cancer-specific survival, and in ER-negative subgroup for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of GC improved survival in patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer.

GR and ER Coactivation Alters the Expression of Differentiation Genes and Associates with Improved ER+ Breast Cancer Outcome

In estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, high tumor glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression has been associated with a relatively poor outcome. In contrast, using a meta-analysis of several genomic datasets, here we find that tumor GR mRNA expression is associated with improved ER(+) relapse-free survival (RFS; independently of progesterone receptor expression). To understand the mechanism by which GR expression is associated with a better ER(+) breast cancer outcome, the global effect of GR-mediated transcriptional activation in ER(+) breast cancer cells was studied. Analysis of GR chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing in ER(+)/GR(+) MCF-7 cells revealed that upon coactivation of GR and ER, GR chromatin association became enriched at proximal promoter regions. Furthermore, following ER activation, increased GR chromatin association was observed at ER, FOXO, and AP1 response elements. In addition, ER associated with GR response elements, suggesting that ER and GR interact in a complex. Coactivation of GR and ER resulted in increased expression (relative to ER activation alone) of transcripts that encode proteins promoting cellular differentiation (e.g., KDM4B, VDR) and inhibiting the Wnt signaling pathway (IGFBP4). Finally, expression of these individual prodifferentiation genes was associated with significantly improved RFS in ER(+) breast cancer patients. Together, these data suggest that the coexpression and subsequent activity of tumor cell GR and ER contribute to the less aggressive natural history of early-stage breast cancer by coordinating the altered expression of genes favoring differentiation.

IMPLICATIONS

The interaction between ER and GR activity highlights the importance of context-dependent nuclear receptor function in cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 14(8); 707-19. ©2016 AACR.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer

AIMS

Endocrine therapy is a pivotal treatment for women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. In premenopausal women, endocrine therapy primarily consists of tamoxifen and ovarian suppressive strategies. Younger women experience improvements in the risks of relapse or death from breast cancer with the use of chemotherapy as well, with part of this benefit explained by resultant premature amenorrhea. Unfortunately despite a centuries worth of clinical trials, the most efficacious combination of hormonal therapies and chemotherapy has yet to be determined. This paper serves as a comprehensive review of the substantial data in the adjuvant treatment of premenopausal, hormone receptor-positive women with breast cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Proceedings searches from 1896 to present were performed. All of the trials examining the role of ovarian suppression and tamoxifen with and without chemotherapy in premenopausal women were included. The current data suggests that endocrine therapy can be an important alternative to chemotherapy in select patient populations, and improvements in outcome are also seen with the combination of hormonal and chemotherapy strategies in other populations. A majority of the trials examined did not use what is considered to be current standards of care regarding chemotherapy regimens and durations of adjuvant hormonal therapy. Many unanswered questions remain particularly regarding the combined use of ovarian suppression and tamoxifen in women who are also receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

There is a persistent need to define optimal endocrine therapy in premenopasusal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. Contemporaneous trials, such as the SOFT trial will provide direction, and additional biomarker and pharmacogenomic data will further supplement individualized patient decision making.

Glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis resistance of solid tumors

More than a quarter of a century ago, the phenomenon of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in the majority of hematological cells was first recognized. More recently, glucocorticoid-induced antiapoptotic signaling associated with apoptosis resistance towards cytotoxic therapy has been identified in cells of epithelial origin, most of malignant solid tumors and some other tissues. Despite these huge amounts of data demonstrating differential pro- and anti-apoptotic effects of glucocorticoids, the underlying mechanisms of cell type-specific glucocorticoid signaling are just beginning to be described. This review summarizes our present understanding of cell type-specific pro- and anti-apoptotic signaling induced by glucocorticoids. We shortly introduce mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance of hematological cells. We highlight and discuss the emerging molecular evidence of a general induction of survival signaling in epithelial cells and carcinoma cells by glucocorticoids. We give a summary of our current knowledge of decreased proliferation rates in response to glucocorticoid pre- and combination treatment, which are suspicious to be involved not only in protection of normal tissues, but also in protection of solid tumors from cytotoxic effects of anticancer agents.

Systematic review of the clinical effect of glucocorticoids on nonhematologic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are often used in the treatment of nonhematologic malignancy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of the effect of glucocorticoid therapy on nonhematologic malignancy.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with nonhematologic malignancy was undertaken. Only studies having endpoints of tumor response or tumor control or survival were included. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register/Databases, conference proceedings (ASCO, AACR, ASTRO/ASTR, ESMO, ECCO) and other resources were used. Data was extracted using a standard form. There was quality assessment of each study. There was a narrative synthesis of information, with presentation of results in tables. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were performed using data from published reports and a fixed effect model.

RESULTS

Fifty four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one meta-analysis, four phase l/ll trials and four case series met the eligibility criteria. Clinical trials of glucocorticoid monotherapy in breast and prostate cancer showed modest response rates. In advanced breast cancer meta-analyses, the addition of glucocorticoids to either chemotherapy or other endocrine therapy resulted in increased response rate, but not increased survival. In GI cancer, there was one RCT each of glucocorticoids vs. supportive care and chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids; glucocorticoid effect was neutral. The only RCT found of chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids, in which the glucocorticoid arm did worse, was in lung cancer. In glucocorticoid monotherapy, meta-analysis found that continuous high dose glucocorticoids had a detrimental effect on survival. The only other evidence, for a detrimental effect of glucocorticoid monotherapy, was in one of the two trials in lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoid monotherapy has some benefit in breast and prostate cancer. In advanced breast cancer, the addition of glucocorticoids to other therapy does not change the long term outcome. In GI cancer, glucocorticoids most likely have a neutral effect. High dose continuous glucocorticoids have a detrimental effect in nonhematologic malignancy. Glucocorticoid therapy might have a deleterious impact in lung cancer.

Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93

PURPOSE

The value of adjuvant tamoxifen after chemotherapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer has not been adequately assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 1999, International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93 enrolled 1,246 assessable premenopausal women with axillary node-positive, operable breast cancer. All patients received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide plus either doxorubicin or epirubicin for four courses followed by immediate or delayed classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for three courses), which was followed by either tamoxifen (20 mg daily) for 5 years or no further treatment. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Tumors were classified as estrogen receptor (ER) -positive (n = 735, 59%) if immunohistochemical (IHC) or ligand-binding assays (LBA) were clearly positive. The ER-negative group included all other tumors (n = 511, 41%). A subset of the ER-negative group was defined as ER absent (n = 108, 9%) if IHC staining was none or if the LBA result was 0 fmol/mg cytosol protein. The median follow-up time was 7 years.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen improved DFS in the ER-positive cohort (hazard ratio [HR] for tamoxifen v no tamoxifen = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.75; P < .0001) but not in the ER-negative cohort (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.35; P = .89). Tamoxifen had a detrimental effect on patients with ER-absent tumors compared with no tamoxifen in an unplanned exploratory analysis (HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.29; P = .04). Patients with ER-positive tumors who achieved chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea had a significantly improved outcome (HR for amenorrhea v no amenorrhea = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86; P = .004), whether or not they received tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved treatment outcome in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive disease, but its use as adjuvant therapy for patients with ER-negative tumors is not recommended.

Adjuvant ovarian suppression versus chemotherapy for premenopausal, hormone-responsive breast cancer: quality of life and efficacy tradeoffs

PURPOSE

Recent clinical trials suggest that adjuvant ovarian suppression may be an equally effective and less toxic alternative to systemic chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. We used a decision-analytic framework to evaluate tradeoffs between efficacy and quality of life in the choice between these treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a Markov state-transition model to simulate clinical practice in a cohort of 40-year-old premenopausal women with newly diagnosed, hormone-responsive early breast cancer. We assessed three adjuvant treatments: chemotherapy, surgical ovarian suppression, and medical ovarian suppression. Outcomes were recurrence-free, overall, and quality-adjusted survival. Quality-adjusted survival reflected effects of cancer, treatment-related side effects, and menopausal symptoms.

RESULTS

Assuming equal efficacy, ovarian suppression was superior to chemotherapy when the relative utility of chemotherapy side effects compared with ovarian suppression side effects was less than 0.95. Results were sensitive to assumptions about the likelihood, duration and consequences of treatment-induced menopause. Treatment choice was affected by a 7% proportional increase in the efficacy of one therapy relative to the others, independent of other factors.

CONCLUSION

If adjuvant chemotherapy and ovarian suppression have similar efficacy, then there may be a subgroup of women for whom quality-of-life considerations dominate the choice of treatment. However, small differences in the relative efficacy of these therapies have a substantial impact on treatment choice, regardless of side effects and menopausal transitions.

Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Amenorrhea During Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Analysis of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study—NCIC CTG MA.5

Purpose

To investigate the therapeutic impact of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in premenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group phase III trial involving premenopausal patients randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF), versus intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF). The objectives of our study were to describe the incidence of amenorrhea at 6 and 12 months post-random assignment and to determine the association of amenorrhea with relapse-free and overall survival.

Results

Data on 442 patients were used in our analyses. Despite the higher cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide in the CMF treatment arm, at 6 months post–random assignment, the rate of amenorrhea was higher in the CEF group (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.3), with no difference at 12 months. In the receptor-positive subgroup, 6-month amenorrhea rates were not associated with prognosis. In contrast, amenorrhea at 12 months was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.82; P = .005) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.72; P = .002).

Conclusion

Late chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea seems to be associated with improved outcome in patients with premenopausal, receptor-positive breast cancer.

Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: influence on disease-free survival and overall survival in receptor-positive premenopausal early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of early chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) on disease-free survival and overall survival in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy without any hormonotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, we reviewed data from 130 premenopausal patients with localized hormone-sensitive breast cancer. These patients were treated between 1985 and 1995 at the same institution. They all underwent a loco-regional treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy. Early CIA was defined as an amenorrhea arising during the first year following the beginning of chemotherapy. Predictors of early CIA were examined. The survival analyses were done using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 9 years. Mean age was 42.9 +/- 5 years. Ninety-two per cent of patients had histologically-proven positive axillary nodes. Adjuvant chemotherapy contained no anthracycline in 63%. Early CIA occurred during or after adjuvant chemotherapy in 57% of the patients. It was definitive in 91%. In our study, age was the only CIA predictor in univariate analysis. Women who experienced early CIA tend to have a longer disease-free survival, but the difference was not significant. This trend was lost in multivariate analysis, most probably due to the small sample size. The overall survival was not different.

CONCLUSION

Although not statistically significant, our results on a very selected population of patients suggest that a chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea might have its own therapeutic effect besides the cytotoxic action of chemotherapy.

Breast cancer and obesity: an update

Obesity has a complicated relationship to both breast cancer risk and the clinical behavior of the established disease. In postmenopausal women, particularly the elderly, various measures of obesity have been positively associated with risk. However, before menopause increased body weight is inversely related to breast cancer risk. In both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, the mechanisms by which body weight and obesity affect risk have been related to estrogenic activity. Obesity has also been related to advanced disease at diagnosis and with a poor prognosis in both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer. Breast cancer in African-American women, considering its relationship to obesity, exhibits some important differences from those described in white women, although the high prevalence of obesity in African-American women may contribute to the relatively poor prognosis compared with white American women. Despite the emphasis on estrogens to explain the effects of obesity on breast cancer, other factors may prove to be equally or more important, particularly as they relate to expression of an aggressive tumor phenotype. Among these, this review serves to stress insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and leptin, and their relationship to angiogenesis, and transcriptional factors.

Efficacy of UFT plus Tamoxifen for Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Tamoxifen plus UFT for???Estrogen-Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective multicentre, collaborative randomised study on postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with stage II primary breast cancer to evaluate the effect of a combination of tegafur and uracil (UFT) on tamoxifen (TAM) plus mitomycin (MM) in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive [ER(+)] breast cancer and TAM on UFT + MM in patients with estrogen-receptor-negative [ER(-)] breast cancer.

METHODS

MM (13 mg/m(2)) was intravenously administered on the day of surgery for all patients, after which patients with ER(+) were randomised to TAM 20 mg/day (treatment A) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment B). Patients who were ER(-) were randomly allocated UFT 400 mg/day (treatment C) or TAM 20 mg/day and UFT 400 mg/day (treatment D). TAM and UFT were administered orally for 2 years, starting on day 14 after surgery.

ENDPOINTS

5-year disease-free survival (5y DFS), 5-year overall survival (5y OS), and safety.

RESULTS

The study commenced in November 1988 and the data cut-off was May 1997 after follow-up of the last patient for 5 years. A total of 765 patients with stage II breast cancer were enrolled. 436 patients with ER(+) [group A: 213, group B: 223] and 317 patients with ER(-) [group C: 162, group D: 155] breast cancer were eligible for this study. The rate of 5y DFS was 83.1% for group A and 90.7% for group B (p = 0.020). There was a significant difference in 5y DFS between the two groups among postmenopausal and positive lymph node metastases patients. The incidence of adverse reactions was 4% for group A and 18% for group B (p < 0.05). The rate of 5y DFS was 77.1% for group C and 85.5% for group D (p = 0.063). The rate of 5y OS was 84.7% for group C and 89.8% for group D (p = 0.216). The incidence of adverse reactions was 18% in group C and 11% in group D (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

UFT in combination with TAM + MM showed higher efficacy than TAM + MM as a postoperative combination therapy for breast cancer in patients with ER(+) breast cancer. A trend was observed in favour of the addition of TAM to UFT + MM in postmenopausal and lymph node metastases-negative patients with ER(-) breast cancer.

Adjuvant therapy for very young women with breast cancer: need for tailored treatments

Breast cancer rarely occurs in women below the age of 35 years. Data from various sources indicate that diagnosis at such an age is associated with a dire prognosis mainly because of a more aggressive presentation. Although the effect of chemotherapy for premenopausal patients is substantial, recent evidence on 2233 patients suggested that very young women with endocrine-responsive tumors had a statistically significantly higher risk of relapse than older premenopausal patients with such tumors. In contrast, results for younger and older premenopausal patients were similar if their tumors were classified as endocrine nonresponsive. Information from studies on 7631 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone in trials of three major U.S. cooperative groups showed a similar interaction between the effect of age and steroid hormone receptor status of the primary tumor. Better treatments for very young patients are required and may involve ovarian function suppression in addition to other endocrine agents in patients with endocrine responsive tumors and a more precise investigation of chemotherapy and its timing, duration, and intensity in those with endocrine nonresponsive tumors. Very young women with this disease are faced with personal, family, professional, and quality-of-life issues, which further complicate the phase of treatment decision making. The development of more effective therapies for younger patients requires tailored treatment investigations and cannot rely on information predominantly contributed from older premenopausal women.

Experimental chemotherapy against canine mammary cancer xenograft in SCID mice and its prediction of clinical effect

The effectiveness of 6 antitumor agents has been evaluated for canine mammary gland tumor (CMG-6) serially transplanted into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. CMG-6 diagnosed as a solid carcinoma was subcutaneously transplanted into SCID mice and six antitumor agents were intravenously given to the mice as a single injection. The effectiveness was evaluated by Treatment group/Control group percent (T/C %) and statistical significance determined by Mann-Whitney's U-test in tumor volume. The minimum effective doses (MEDs; mg/kg) of mice were as follows; cyclophosphamide (CPM) 65, doxorubicin (DXR) 6, cisplatin (CDDP) 5, vincristine (VCR) 1.6, vinblastine (VLB) more than 5.5, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 105. Clinical effects of the drugs were predicted based on area under the curve (AUC) of dogs given a clinical dose (AUCdog)/AUC of mice given a MED (AUCmouse) ratios from published references. The AUC ratios were as follows; CPM 2.24, DXR 0.19, CDDP 1.20, VCR 0.04, VLB <1.24 and 5-FU 1.15. Drugs indicating more than 1.0 in AUCdog/AUCmouse ratio were CPM, CDDP and 5-FU, and would be suggested as effective in the original patient with CMG-6. The combination chemotherapy using clinically equivalent doses in CDDP and CPM, which were the two highest values in AUCdog/AUCmouse ratio by single agent therapy, was performed and shown to have additional effects as compared to the responsiveness of each agent against CMG-6.

Does treatment at the time of locoregional failure of breast cancer alter prognosis?

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer local consequences such as bleeding, ulceration, pain and arm oedema or symptoms of metastases. Unlike existing treatment guidelines for primary tumours, both local (surgical and radiation) and systemic treatment recommendations are less well defined after LRR. The purpose of this review was to assess whether or not treatment at the time of locoregional failure ultimately alters a patient's prognosis. Unfortunately, the data from both retrospective and prospective studies are inconclusive and therefore the treatment of patients with LRR will continue to be recommended using guidelines similar to those for primary breast cancer. Future studies of factors predicting LRR and metastatic spread may allow better prognostication of patients with LRR which may in turn effect both local and systemic treatment decisions.

Sample size calculations for the two-sample problem using the multiplicative intensity model

In this paper we propose formulae for calculating the expected number of events or, alternatively, the required trial duration, for clinical trials involving two treatment groups in which patients may potentially experience multiple events and the data will be analysed using a multiplicative intensity (MI) model. We use a partial likelihood-based approach and examine in detail two MI models: one that includes a binary treatment variable as the only covariate and a three-state Markov process model in which a binary time-varying covariate is added to the previous model. For the simpler model, our formula coincides with those derived by Cook using full likelihood methods. We present applications of the derived formulae to chronic granulomatous disease and breast cancer data sets.

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) in breast cancer--is it cost-effective?

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) may expose patients to morbidity, with little gain in outcome. Treatment with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) has been the standard ACT in several countries for decades. In this model, efficacy, tolerability and quality of life data from the English-language literature were incorporated with Norwegian standard ACT practice and cost data in a cost-effectiveness/cost-utility approach. The CMF efficacy was calculated as 2.45 years saved per patient treated. The quality of life was assumed diminished by 0.33 (0-1 scale) for 6 months and the life years gained were valued Q = 0.86. An 85% dose intensity was employed, one British pound ( 1) was calculated as 12 NOK and a 5% discount rate was used. The total cost of adjuvant CMF, including amounts spent on drugs, administration, travelling and production loss, was calculated to 2365- 6253, depending on the method chosen. Money spent on drugs alone constituted 13-34%. The cost per life year saved was measured as 2170- 5737. A cost-utility approach revealed a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of 2973- 7860. Adjuvant CMF in breast cancer is cost-effective in Norway.

Prognostic effect of amenorrhoea and elevated serum gonadotropin levels induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients

The purpose of the study was to determine the correlation between prognosis and chemotherapy induced amenorrhoea or elevated gonadotropin levels in node-positive breast cancer patients. Since we have previously found a better prognosis in patients with more profound leucopenia induced by adjuvant chemotherapy, we examined whether this effect was mediated through more efficient induction of amenorrhoea. The study population consisted of 126 premenopausal, primarily operable, node-positive breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) adjuvant chemotherapy at the Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital between 1990 and 1993. 12 months after the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy, the patients were divided into groups with respect to their menstrual function (regular menstruation, irregular menstruation or amenorrhoea). Information about menstruation status and serum concentration of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol were recorded at 12 and 24 months from the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 72 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea or had irregular menstruation after chemotherapy had a significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in univariate analysis than women who continued to menstruate (P = 0.02). Amenorrhoea and irregular menstruation were associated with a better DFS among patients with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive primary tumours (P = 0.007), whereas no such association was found in ER negative cases (P = 0.86). 5-year overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis was also better in patients who experienced amenorrhoea (81%) or who had irregular menstruation (90%) after chemotherapy as compared with patients with regular menstruation (68%; 81 versus 68%, P = 0.05). The serum FSH level did not correlate significantly with outcome irrespective of the cut-off point chosen. Nodal status, tumour size and menstruation status after chemotherapy were also significantly associated with DFS in a multivariate analysis. The menstruation status after chemotherapy lost its significance for OS in a multivariate analysis whilst the number of affected lymph nodes, tumour size and oestrogen/progesterone receptor status retained their impact. There was no association between the degree of leucopenia and induction of amenorrhoea by CMF. Chemotherapy-induced ovarian function suppression (amenorrhoea/irregular menstruation) after chemotherapy had a favourable effect on DFS in premenopausal breast cancer patients. The post-chemotherapy menstruation status is a clinically usable marker for sufficient endocrine effect of chemotherapy in ER/PR-positive patients in all premenopausal age groups. FSH level seemed to be a less reliable indicator of the castration effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in this study.

Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil (CMF) Regimen

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column reviews various issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, both commercially available and investigational.

Current status of tamoxifen use: An update for the surgical oncologist

The surgical oncologist is frequently responsible for the screening and diagnosis of women with breast cancer. In this pivotal role, they are often the first to discuss treatment options, including nonsurgical interventions, with breast cancer patients. Recent long-term clinical trial data provide support for the use of tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer in women at high risk of the disease. A breast cancer risk assessment can help identify women at higher than average risk for the disease, who may be appropriate candidates for chemoprevention. It is important for the surgical oncologist to understand the current indications and evidence regarding the use of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention and treatment as they counsel their patients on available options.

Postoperative chemo-endocrine treatment with mitomycin C, tamoxifen, and UFT is effective for patients with premenopausal estrogen receptor-positive stage II breast cancer. Nishinihon Cooperative Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

The effectiveness of combining mitomycin C (MMC), tamoxifen (TAM), and 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (tegafur) was evident in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. UFT, an oral preparation of tegafur and uracil at a molar ratio of 1:4, was reported to have higher antitumor effects than tegafur alone for patients with breast cancer. Therefore, the combined chemotherapy of MMC, TAM and UFT may possibly be effective for breast cancer. From 1988 to 1991. we studied the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy for Japanese women with stage 11 breast cancer, all seen at 71 institutions in western areas of Japan. Five hundred and ninety four patients with stage II primary breast cancer who had undergone curative surgery, including total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, were enrolled. On the day of surgery, each patient was given 13 mg/m2 of MMC intravenously. Patients with ER+ tumors were then assigned to group A or group B. Group A received 30 mg/day of TAM given orally from postoperative 2 weeks, for 2 years. Group B was additionally given an oral dose of 300 mg/day of UFT for 2 years, given concomitantly with 30 mg/day of TAM. Patients with ER- tumors were assigned to group C or group D. Group C were prescribed 300 mg/day of UFT, orally, from postoperative 2 weeks for 2 years, and group D were additionally given an oral dose of 30 mg/day of TAM together with 300 mg/day of UFT. There were no differences among the groups regarding prognostic factors or doses of MMC and TAM in ER+ patients and MMC and UFT in ER- patients. Toxicity rates for leukopenia, anorexia, and nausea/vomiting were higher in group B than in group A patients. There were no statistical differences in the overall survival and disease-free survival times between groups A and B, or groups C and D, for all eligible cases. In a retrospective subgroup analysis using Bonferroni's adjustments, the additional effect of UFT on the combined treatment of MMC and TAM lengthened the disease-free survival time for patients with premenopausal ER+ cancers (corrected P value by Bonferroni's adjustments <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that effects of the combined treatment of MMC, TAM, and UFT was significantly related to the menopausal status (P<0.01). Our findings show that postoperative ingestion of MMC, TAM, and UFT was effective for patients with premenopausal ER+ stage II breast cancer.

Locoregional failure 10 years after mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation: experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To assess patterns of failure and how selected prognostic and treatment factors affect the risks of locoregional failure (LRF) after mastectomy in breast cancer patients with histologically involved axillary nodes treated with chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 2,016 patients entered onto four randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 12.1 years (range, 0.07 to 19.1 years).

RESULTS

A total of 1,099 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. The first sites of failure were as follows: isolated LRF, 254 (13%); LRF with simultaneous distant failure (DF), 166 (8%); and distant only, 679 (34%). The risk of LRF with or without simultaneous DF at 10 years was 12.9% in patients with one to three positive nodes and 28.7% for patients with four or more positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing tumor size, increasing numbers of involved nodes, negative estrogen receptor protein status, and decreasing number of nodes examined were significant for increasing the rate of LRF with or without simultaneous DF.

CONCLUSION

LRF after mastectomy is a substantial clinical problem, despite the use of chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen. Prospective randomized trials will be necessary to estimate accurately the potential disease-free and overall survival benefits of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients in particular prognostic subgroups treated with presently used and future systemic therapy regimens.

The Role of Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer

This review reassesses the role of hormonal therapy in breast cancer specifically the sequential or concurrent use of endocrine therapy and the combined use of chemotherapy with endocrine therapy. In advanced disease the sequential use of hormone therapies is generally recommended rather than the combined use of various hormonal agents, though combination hormonal therapy offers advantages in certain subsets of patients. The efficacy of combined chemo-endocrine therapy is questionable. Chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment is an attractive but still experimental concept. However, in an adjuvant setting there is evidence that combined chemo-endocrine therapy causes a significant increase in disease-free and/or overall survival, particularly in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor(ER)-positive tumors. While hormonal treatment strategies have clearly benefitted from randomized studies, data regarding optimal endocrine therapy are still insufficient.

Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI

Adjuvant chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea has been shown to be associated with reduced relapses and improved survival for premenopausal breast cancer patients. Amenorrhoea was, therefore, studied to define features of chemotherapy (i.e. duration and timing) and disease-related factors which are associated with its treatment effects. We reviewed data from IBCSG Trial VI, in which accrual was between July 1986 and April 1993. 1196 of the 1475 eligible patients (81%) were evaluable for this analysis. The median follow-up was 60 months. Women who experienced amenorrhoea had a significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) than those who did not (P = 0.0004), although the magnitude of the effect was reduced when adjusted for other prognostic factors (P = 0.09). The largest treatment effect associated with amenorrhoea was seen in patients assigned to receive only three initial CMF courses (5-yr DFS: 67% versus 49%, no amenorrhoea; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P = 0.002). DFS differences between amenorrhoea categories were larger for patients with ER/PR positive tumours (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80; P = 0.0001). Furthermore, patients whose menses returned after brief amenorrhoea had a DFS similar to those whose menses ceased and did not recover (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.62; P = 0.63). The effects associated with a permanent or temporary chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea are especially significant for node-positive breast cancer patients who receive a suboptimal duration of CMF chemotherapy. Cessation of menses, even for a limited time period after diagnosis of breast cancer, might be beneficial and should be prospectively investigated, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive primaries.

Amenorrhea induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: prognostic role and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

The role of amenorrhea induced by chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer is very controversial. Analyses by various authors of the effect of drug-induced amenorrhea (DIA) on treatment outcome have yielded conflicting results. In order to gain insight into the role of DIA, we reviewed all published data addressing the issue of DIA as a prognostic factor.

METHODS

Computerised and manual searches were conducted of relevant studies published from 1966 to 1995.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 3929 patients were selected. In two papers, the prognostic role of DIA was analysed in three and two different groups of patients, respectively. Overall, 16 groups of patients were evaluated. With 12 groups, a higher disease free survival was observed in patients developing DIA compared to those who did not. This difference was statistically significant in eight groups. Data on overall survival, reported in only five studies, indicated that it was always improved in patients who became amenorrheic.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data on the role of DIA support its importance as a favorable prognostic factor for early breast cancer patients. However, due to the possible biases of this type of evaluation, this result should be interpreted with caution.

Is it time to develop an optimal endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients with axillary node positive and negative breast cancer?

One hundred years ago ovarian ablation was shown to be an effective treatment for advanced breast cancer in premenopausal women. Since that time many different treatment modalities have been advocated to improve patient survival. The value of adjuvant ovarian ablation, however, has recently been established in the overview of breast cancer clinical trials. In fact, comparison of the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with earlier trials of oophorectomy demonstrate the superiority of oophorectomy. The effectiveness of chemotherapy may largely be the result of partial ovarian ablation produced in premenopausal patients. Based on this position, we propose a clinical trial that would establish the optimal therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. In addition, the beneficial effects of long-term tamoxifen as it pertains to serum lipids and bone density are highlighted. The use of tamoxifen maintenance in oophorectomized women might provide an optimal therapy for the control of breast cancer recurrence.

Effect of a cytotoxic analog of LH-RH (T-98) on the growth of estrogen-dependent MXT mouse mammary cancers: correlations between growth characteristics and EGF receptor content of tumors

Female BDF mice bearing estrogen-dependent MXT mouse mammary cancers were treated for 4 weeks with a cytotoxic analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). T-98 (agonist [D-Lys6]LH-RH linked to glutaryl-2(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone). The effects of T-98 were compared to those of equimolar amounts of the cytotoxic moiety 2-(hydroxymethyl)anthraquinone hemiglutarate (G-HMAQ) and carrier LH-RH agonist [D-Lys6]LH-RH. Both T-98 and [D-Lys6]LH-RH significantly inhibited the growth of MXT cancers, but G-HMAQ had only a minor non-significant effect. Cytotoxic analog T-98 and the carrier [D-Lys6]LH-RH had similar inhibitory hormonal activities on the pituitary-gonadal axis, but T-98 caused a larger reduction in tumor volume and decreased proliferation characteristics such as mitotic activity and AgNOR numbers in tumor cells to a greater extent than the carrier. Tumor inhibition by T-98, [D-Lys6]LH-RH, and ovariectomy was connected with a significant decrease in binding capacity of EGF receptors in tumor cell membranes. The concentration of EGF receptors remained high in tumors that continued to enlarge in spite of treatment and in all control untreated tumors, even those of small size. Thus, the changes in EGF receptors are likely to be the result of the therapy. Treatment with T-98 caused a greater reduction in the binding capacity of EGF receptors in tumors than [D-Lys6]LH-RH. This could explain the higher inhibitory effect of the cytotoxic analog on tumor growth. Since radiolabeled T-98 was shown to accumulate in MXT cancers 3 hours after a subcutaneous injection, this indicates that specific targeting might play a role in the antitumor effect exerted by this cytotoxic analog.

The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

The addition of low-dose prednisone (p) to the adjuvant regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) allowed patients to receive a larger dose of cytotoxics when compared with those on CMF alone. However, disease-free survival and overall survival were similar for the two groups. To test the hypothesis that low-dose prednisone might influence the efficacy of the cytotoxic regimen used, the toxicity profiles of the two treatment regimens and the patterns of treatment failure (relapse, second malignancy, or death) were examined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes included in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial I from 1978 to 1981 and randomized to receive CMF or CMFp were analyzed for differences in long-term outcome and toxic events. The 250 patients assigned to CMF and prednisone received on the average 12% more cytotoxic drugs than those who received CMF alone.

RESULTS

The 13-year DFS for the CMFp group was 49% as compared to 52% for CMF alone, and the respective OS percents were 59% and 65%. Several toxic effects such as leukopenia, alopecia, mucositis and induced amenorrhea were reported at a similar incidence in the two treatment groups. Using cumulative incidence methodology for competing risks, we detected a statistically significant increase in first relapse in the skeleton for the CMFp group at 13 years follow-up with a relative risk (RR) of 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 3.46; P = 0.004]. Patients with larger tumors in the CMFp regimen were especially subject to this increase with a RR for failure in the skeleton of 3.32 (95% CI, 1.57 to 7.02; P = 0.0005). CMFp-treated patients also had a larger proportion of second malignancies (not breast cancer), with RR of 3.34 (95% CI, 0.91 to 12.31; P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose continuous prednisone added to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy enabled the use of higher doses of cytotoxics. This increased dose had no beneficial effect on treatment outcome, but was associated with an increased risk for bone relapses and a small, not statistically significant increased incidence of second malignancies. The effects of steroids, which are widely used as antiemetics (oral or pulse injection) together with cytotoxics, should be investigated to identify their influence upon treatment outcome.

The prognosis of stage III breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy and adriamycin-based chemotherapy with and without tamoxifen. Eight year follow-up results of a randomized trial

Sixty-one patients with primary node positive stage III breast cancers were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy (eight cycles of CAFt: cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, oral ftorafur) with or without tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment. The five-year overall survival for all patients was 49% (with tamoxifen 48% and without tamoxifen 50%) and disease-free survival 33% (with tamoxifen 27% and without 39%). Local control for all patients was only 64% despite the postoperative radiotherapy. There was no significant difference between these two treatment groups in overall and disease-free survival or local control. The prognosis of stage III breast cancer remains grim despite modern adjuvant therapy. In addition to more effective systemic treatment more effective local therapy is also needed in order to obtain satisfactory local control. The most important studies in stage III breast cancer with 5-year survival results are reviewed here.

Positive effect of tamoxifen as part of adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Hokkaido Adjuvant Chemo-Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Study Group

A prospective randomised multicentre clinical study was undertaken for 2 years and 3 months from November 1982, with the aim of examining the significance of using a combination of ftorafur (FT) and tamoxifen (TAM) for post-operative adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Patients had either stage II or stage IIIa disease, were age 75 or below and had undergone radical mastectomy. Patients were divided into two groups and received one of the following treatment protocols: treatment A, intravenous administration of doxorubicin (DOX), 20 mg on the day of surgery and 10 mg the next day, followed by oral FT 50 mg day-1 for 2 years from the 14th day; treatment B, the same pattern of DOX administration for the first 2 days, followed by a combined therapy of FT and TAM 20 mg day-1 for 2 years. The number of patients was 546 (treatment A 274 and treatment B 272), of whom 34 (6%) were ineligible. The remaining 512 patients (treatment A 254 and treatment B 258) were followed up for 5 years for analysis. Significantly higher 5 year disease-free rate and 5 year survival rates were observed with treatment B compared with treatment A. When seen in terms of background factors, node-positive patients appeared to derive more benefit from tamoxifen than node-negative patients, but the oestrogen receptor-negative and premenopausal subgroups appeared to derive about the same benefit as those who were oestrogen receptor positive and post-menopausal. Indeed, survival in the premenopausal group was significantly better with tamoxifen (P = 0.04). No increase in side-effects was seen by combining TAM with FT. The study results demonstrate that concomitant administration of FT and TAM is better than FT alone for post-operative adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

High DNA content and prognosis in lymph node positive breast cancer. A case control study by the University of Leiden and ECOG. (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)

To investigate whether breast cancer cells with unusually high nuclear DNA content are associated with an adverse outcome, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators selected breast cancer trial patients who suffered an early death (ED) within two years after diagnosis to compare with other trial patients who had a survival of at least 7.5 years. Paraffin blocks of primary breast cancers were obtained from 93 evaluable patients who had been enrolled in two surgical adjuvant trials for lymph node positive (LN+) disease (T1-3N1M0). Single cell monolayer preparations from these blocks were stained with acriflavine-Feulgen and analyzed by image analysis for DNA content with the automated Leiden Television Analysis System (LEY-TAS). Standard prognostic variables (estrogen receptor (ER) status, number of lymph nodes with metastases, and size of the cancer) were compared with three DNA content characteristics: DNA ploidy status, number of nuclei with > 5C DNA content, and percent of nuclei with > 5 C. Estimates of the odds ratio in multivariate comparisons showed that ER negativity was associated with ED (p = 0.0005) and an odds ratio estimate using negative/positive of 4.87. The number of positive lymph nodes associated with ED had a p-value of 0.0005 and an odds ratio estimate of 4.63 when comparing the > 3 nodes group to the 1-3 nodes group. In contrast, the strongest association for any of the DNA content characteristics with ED had a p-value of 0.017 and an odds ratio estimate of 2.76. This power of association disappeared when stratified on ER status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Patterns of tumor relapse following mastectomy and adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer. Impact of clinical, histopathologic, and flow cytometric factors

BACKGROUND

This analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of selected clinical, histopathologic, and flow cytometric factors on sites of initial tumor relapse after postmastectomy adjuvant systemic therapy.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-four patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer were entered in two prospectively randomized trials and received cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil and prednisone with or without tamoxifen as sole adjuvant therapy. These patients were studied to assess the risk of locoregional recurrence and to identify factors that might predict tumor relapse site.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 9.3 years, the 8-year cumulative incidences of initial locoregional or distant relapse were 20% and 35%, respectively. Pathologic tumor stage, estrogen receptor content, and number of involved axillary nodes were independent predictive factors for an increased risk of locoregional recurrence. With the exception of tumor stage, these factors also were associated with an increased risk of distant relapse so that tumor stage (T3a) remained the sole factor predictive of increased relative risk for initial locoregional (versus distant) recurrence in patients with tumor progression. Clinical and flow cytometric factors were not predictive of initial locoregional or distant relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Exploratory data analysis of two prospective trials of postmastectomy adjuvant systemic therapy has demonstrated a significant risk for initial isolated locoregional recurrence in certain patients with node-positive breast cancer. The benefit of improved locoregional tumor control in appropriately selected patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer who receive adjuvant systemic therapy requires additional investigation.

Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate for node-positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The Comprehensive Cancer Center trial 82-01 is a prospective randomized study to investigate the value of the addition of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to chemotherapy in patients with node-positive operable breast cancer. MPA may be of advantage in this setting because of its activity in estrogen receptor ER-positive as well as ER-negative tumors and since it may protect against chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and thus enable maintenance of the appropriate chemotherapeutic scheduling.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred eight evaluable patients with node-positive (N+) operable breast cancer (T1-3, N1) were entered in a multicenter randomized trial. Two hundred nine patients were randomized in the MPA- arm and 199 in the MPA+ arm. CAF chemotherapy was given as a short i.v. bolus infusion: cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, q 4 wks x 6. MPA was given intramuscularly (i.m.) 500 mg q d x 28 days, followed by 500 mg i.m. twice weekly during 5 months.

RESULTS

The main side effects of MPA were weight gain with a mean of 5.5 kg as opposed to 1.8 kg in the control group (p = 0.01) and vaginal bleeding in 30/199 in the MPA+ group and 0 in the MPA- group. MPA ameliorated vomiting grade III, IV (45% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), nausea grade III, IV (50% vs. 34%, p < 0.001) and leucocyte nadir grade III, IV (20% vs. 11%, p = 0.003). Disease-free survival (DFS) after 5 years was 59% in the MPA+ and 49% in the MPA- group (p = 0.12). Patients > or = 60 years benefitted most from MPA treatment, in particular if freedom from distant metastases was taken as the endpoint (p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (p = 0.18), but within subgroups analysed there was an advantage for MPA+ in patients > or = 55 years (p = 0.002) and in pT1 patients (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose MPA ameliorates CAF side effects and reduces the risk of metastatic disease, especially in elderly breast cancer patients.

The combination of radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-ftorafur) and tamoxifen in stage II breast cancer. Long-term follow-up results of a randomised trial

Two hundred patients with node positive stage II breast cancer were randomised to four groups after radical mastectomy and axillary evacuation: (1) Postoperative radiotherapy, (2) Adjuvant chemotherapy with eight courses of CAFt (cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 + doxorubicin 40 mg/m-2 + ftorafur 20 mg kg-1 orally day 1-14) every fourth week, (3) Postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy and (4) postoperative radiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen 40 mg daily for 2 years. Thirty-two per cent of the patients discontinued treatment due to GI-toxicity, while 26% required dose reductions due to leukopenia. Radiation pneumonitis was more frequent after the combination of postoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy. There was a better relapse-free survival in the groups receiving chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone (P = 0.05), which was highly significant in a multivariate Cox analysis (P = 0.004). No significant survival differences were seen. Tamoxifen had no clear overall effect but there were better relapse-free (P = 0.04) and overall (P = 0.004) survival with tamoxifen in estrogen receptor positive patients, while estrogen receptor negative patients had a somewhat poorer survival (P = 0.07) after tamoxifen. Local control was better (NS) after the combination (93%) radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared to either treatment alone (76% with radiotherapy and 74% with chemotherapy at 5 years).

Randomized adjuvant trial to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen and PSK to chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer. 5-Year results from the Nishi-Nippon Group of the Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Organization

BACKGROUND

A randomized adjuvant trial was conducted from October 1982 to January 1985 to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to combination chemotherapy with perioperative mitomycin C (MMC) and ftorafur (FT) for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors and the addition of PSK, a biologic response modifier, to MMC+FT chemotherapy for patients with ER-negative tumors in operable Stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA cancer. The doses used were 20 mg of oral TAM daily, 600 mg of oral FT daily, and 3 g of oral PSK daily for 2 years. Intravenous MMC (13 mg/m2) was given on the day of operation.

METHODS

A total of 967 patients were entered and randomized by stratification based on ER status and staging (1978 International Union Against Cancer [UICC] criteria at the time of trial execution). Of 967 patients, 914 (94.5%) were evaluable. At 5-year follow-up, significant prolonged overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) times were seen with the addition of TAM in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIIA T3N0 cancer (1987 UICC-American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] criteria); however, no significant survival benefit from TAM was seen in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer. There was no significant difference between regimens, with or without PSK, in patients with ER-negative disease.

RESULTS

Results of subset analyses suggested a benefit from TAM in postmenopausal patients with ER-positive and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer and a benefit from PSK in patients with node-negative, ER-negative, and Stage IIA T2N1 cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year results of the current trial showed a survival advantage by the addition of TAM to chemotherapy in patients with ER-positive and Stage IIIA T3N0 cancer.

Proportional hazards and recursive partitioning and amalgamation analyses of the Southwest Oncology Group node-positive adjuvant CMFVP breast cancer data base: a pilot study

Several putative prognostic factors have been identified in node-positive breast cancer patients, but their importance needs to be clarified in a uniformly treated population. The objectives of this investigation were: 1) to describe the characteristics of a uniformly treated node-positive data base; 2) to use proportional hazards (Cox) and recursive partitioning and amalgamation (RPA) multivariate models to assess the importance of potential prognostic factors for disease-free and for overall survival; and 3) to define prognostic groups with different disease-free survival and survival outcomes with RPA. A data base of 768 node-positive patients enrolled on 1-year adjuvant CMFVP arms of four SWOG trials was formed. Variables were number of positive nodes, age, age at menopause, menopausal status, ER status, ER and PgR levels (for RPA only), tumor size, race, breast cancer in mother, and obesity index. Independent predictors of both disease-free and overall survival in the Cox models were: number of positive nodes (4-6 worse than 1-3, and better than greater than 6); the age/menopause category (age greater than or equal to 35/premenopausal better than age less than 35/premenopausal and better than postmenopausal); and ER status (patients on ER-negative study worse than others). The RPA for disease-free survival defined four subgroups based on nodes, menopausal status, tumor size, and age at menopause (5-year recurrence-free rates = 73%, 52%, 38%, and 15%). The RPA for survival found four prognostic groups, defined only by the number of positive nodes and ER and PgR levels (5-year survivals = 91%, 72%, 56%, and 37%). Both RPAs suggested interesting refinements of the results of the Cox models. In the RPA for disease-free survival, best node cutoffs differed by menopausal status, tumor size was important only in postmenopausal patients with few positive nodes, and age at menopause emerged as an independent predictor of recurrence potential. And, the RPA for survival showed that node cutoffs differed according to ER level. Thus, these analyses underscore the value of simple, clinically available prognostic factors and suggest the possible need to reconsider the definition of good and poor risk patient groups in future adjuvant trial design.