The effects of estrogen, progesterone, and tamoxifen alone and in combination with cytotoxic agents against human ovarian carcinoma in vitro

Ingenuity pathway analysis of gingival epithelial cells stimulated with estradiol and progesterone

OBJECTIVE

Periodontal disease is a risk factor for preterm delivery, and elevated female hormone levels during pregnancy promote hormone-dependent periodontopathogenic bacterial growth and gingivitis. Although the saliva of pregnant women contains female hormones at elevated levels, their effects on the gingiva are poorly understood. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of estradiol and progesterone stimulation on gingival epithelial cells via ingenuity pathway analysis.

METHODS

Human gingival epithelial progenitors were cultured in a CnT-Prime medium; 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) were used as the reagents. Cells treated with dimethyl sulfoxide alone were used as the control group. Cells in the control and experimental groups were incubated for 12 h. RNA was extracted from the cultured cells, RNA-Seq was performed, and pathway analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Differentially expressed genes were detected for 699 (over 2-fold increase) and 348 (decrease) genes in group E2 and for 1448 (increase) and 924 (decrease) genes in group P4 compared with those in the control group (FDR <0.05, n = 4). The z-scores of the pathways suggest that E2 and P4 increased the activity of the wound healing signaling pathway. The activation of this pathway was higher in the E2 and P4 groups than that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that estradiol and progesterone may affect gingival homeostasis and wound healing.

Identification and confirmation of differentially expressed fucosylated glycoproteins in the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a lectin array and LC-MS/MS

In order to discover potential glycoprotein biomarkers in ovarian cancer, we applied a lectin array and Exactag labeling based quantitative glycoproteomics approach. A lectin array strategy was used to detect overall lectin-specific glycosylation changes in serum proteins from patients with ovarian cancer and those with benign conditions. Lectins, which showed significant differential response for fucosylation, were used to extract glycoproteins that had been labeled using isobaric chemical tags. The glycoproteins were then identified and quantified by LC-MS/MS, and five glycoproteins were found to be differentially expressed in the serum of ovarian cancer patients compared to benign diseases. The differentially expressed glycoproteins were further confirmed by lectin-ELISA and ELISA assay. Corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), serum amyloid p component (SAP), complement factor B (CFAB), and histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) were identified as potential markers for differentiating ovarian cancer from benign diseases or healthy controls. A combination of CBG and HRG (AUC = 0.825) showed comparable performance to CA125 (AUC = 0.829) in differentiating early stage ovarian cancer from healthy controls. The combination of CBG, SAP, and CA125 showed improved performance for distinguishing stage III ovarian cancer from benign diseases compared to CA125 alone. The ability of CBG, SAP, HRG, and CFAB to differentiate the serum of ovarian cancer patients from that of controls was tested using an independent set of samples. Our findings suggest that glycoprotein modifications may be a means to identify novel diagnostic markers for detection of ovarian cancer.

Targeted agents in ovarian cancer

Despite recent advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer, a large majority of women with this diagnosis will die from recurrence of their disease. Targeted therapies, in the form of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors have significantly altered the management of many solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. No such agents have been approved by the US FDA for use in ovarian cancer, although Phase II data suggests excellent single-agent activity of some of these drugs. Antiangiogenic agents in combination with chemotherapy are being evaluated in Phase III clinical trials, both in the adjuvant setting and in recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors are promising agents in BRCA1/2-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the anti-tumor effect of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors administered as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy. Many other new drugs are in earlier grades of development. In this article, we review the state of the art in targeted therapies for ovarian cancer and identify future directions for their development in the management of this often devastating disease.

Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status

Over recent decades, truly impressive progress has been made in the outcome associated with the pharmacological antineoplastic management of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Following initial surgery, the large majority of patients with this malignancy will receive a chemotherapy regimen that includes a platinum drug (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Currently, objective responses are observed in approximately 60-80% of patients treated in the front-line setting, with documented improvements in overall survival compared with prior non-platinum and taxane programmes. Unfortunately, despite the high response rate to initial chemotherapy, the majority of women with advanced disease will experience recurrence of the malignant process and be candidates for a variety of possible second-line therapeutic options. It is well recognized that ovarian cancer patients who are documented to experience an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy but where the disease recurs approximately 6 or more months following the completion of primary therapy, may have another clinically meaningful response (both objective and subjective) to a second platinum-based strategy. However, an optimal management approach in this setting remains to be defined. Furthermore, the malignant cell populations in all ovarian cancer patients who experience an initial relapse of the disease process will eventually be resistant to the platinum agents. In this setting, multiple drugs have been shown to be biologically active. Again, an optimal strategy to be employed in the platinum-resistant setting has yet to be demonstrated through the conduct of evidence-based trials. Reasonable goals of therapy in women with recurrent or resistant ovarian cancer are to improve overall survival, reduce the severity (and delay the occurrence) of symptoms and optimize overall quality of life.

Bevacizumab and rapamycin inhibit tumor growth in peritoneal model of human ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer. Often, the disease has spread beyond the ovary to involve the peritoneal cavity and causes ascites. Whereas mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions to regulate protein translation, cell cycle progression, and metastasis, vascular endothelial growth factor promotes tumor angiogenesis, ascites formation, and metastasis in ovarian cancer. In this study, an i.p. model of human ovarian cancer was used to determine the antitumor activity of rapamycin, bevacizumab, and rapamycin plus bevacizumab (BEV/RAPA). We report that administration of rapamycin, bevacizumab, and BEV/RAPA in mice bearing peritoneal OV-90 ovarian carcinoma resulted in 74.6%, 82.4%, and 93.3% reduction in i.p. tumor burden, respectively. BEV/RAPA-induced reduction in microvessel density and inhibition of cell proliferation were associated with significant reduction in hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and cyclin D1 and inactivation of downstream targets of mTOR, p70S6 kinase, S6R, and 4E-binding protein 1. BEV/RAPA treatment was not only able to prolong life of i.p. mice but also more effective than rapamycin and bevacizumab to prevent the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis in adjuvant setting and reverse ascites accumulation in heavy peritoneal disease. Our data indicate that simultaneous inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and mTOR pathways with BEV/RAPA or their analogues may represent a novel approach for prevention of metastasis, recurrence, and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Phase 2 trial of carboplatin plus tamoxifen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum

OBJECTIVES

A previously reported phase 2 trial suggested substantial clinical activity associated with the combination of a platinum agent and tamoxifen in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. We wished to confirm or refute this observation in a patient population with well-characterized platinum-resistant disease.

METHODS

Patients with ovarian or fallopian tube cancers or primary carcinoma of the peritoneum whose disease had either failed to respond to a platinum-based regimen or had responded but experienced a "treatment-free interval (TFI)" of < or =3 months, or if the TFI was >3 months they had been retreated and failed a platinum-based program, were eligible for entry into this phase 2 single institution protocol. Carboplatin (AUC 5) was delivered on a q-21 day cycle. Tamoxifen was administered at a dose of 80 mg/day for the first cycle, and then reduced to 40 mg/day. Treatment was to be continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were treated on this phase 2 trial. In addition to being platinum-resistant, 10 patients had cancers that were also documented to be taxane-resistant (similar criteria to that defined above for platinum). While treatment was generally well tolerated, there were no objective (measurable disease or CA-125 response criteria) or subjective responses to this treatment program.

CONCLUSION

In this phase 2 trial, we have been unable to confirm a meaningful level of clinical activity for the combination of carboplatin plus tamoxifen in a patient population with well-characterized platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Tamoxifen therapy for ovarian cancer in the adjuvant and advanced settings: systematic review of the literature and implications for future research

BACKGROUND

Ovarian neoplasms frequently express hormonal receptors and are sensitive to hormonal manipulations, as shown by preclinical and clinical studies. However, despite the outstanding relevance of hormonal adjuvant therapy in breast cancer and the importance of receptor status as a predictive factor, few trials have addressed these issues in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Computerized and manual searches were performed to identify preclinical and clinical studies evaluating single-agent tamoxifen activity in ovarian cancer or any kind of hormonal therapy employed as adjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

In advanced tumors, none of the trials was performed exclusively in chemonaive patients, but those including less heavily pretreated patients showed greater response rates. Some studies found a correlation between receptor status and activity (although differences were not significant), whereas other trials did not. Nevertheless, none were specifically designed to answer this question. Few randomized trials comparing hormonal treatment and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were identified. Although their results were negative, all were small, and none was designed with the rigor that allowed adjuvant hormonal therapy to become successfully established in breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The activity of tamoxifen in advanced ovarian cancer has not been adequately evaluated and its role may have been underestimated. Furthermore, the relevance of adjuvant hormonal therapy in ovarian cancer and the predictive value of hormonal receptors have never been studied in well-designed trials. Additional studies to clarify the role of tamoxifen for this indication are warranted.

A combination of platinum and tamoxifen in advanced ovarian cancer failing platinum-based chemotherapy: results of a Phase II study

The treatment of recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer has limited therapeutic potential. The clinical outcome of second-line therapy largely depends on the potential chemo-sensitivity of the tumor expressed during up-front chemotherapy, as well as on the treatment-free interval from the last course of cytotoxic therapy. However, the identification of agents such as tamoxifen (TAM) at nontoxic doses, able to act synergistically with standard chemotherapy, may be useful to overcome resistance. Fifty patients with recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer following platinum (P)-based chemotherapy (28 platinum-resistant and 22 platinum-sensitive) entered a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of P re-challenge with the addition of TAM as a chemotherapy response modulator. The choice of the P compound (100 mg/m2 cisplatin or 400 mg/m2 carboplatin, q3 weeks) was made on the basis of the prior total cisplatin dose and the presence of neurotoxicity. TAM was administered at the doses of 80 mg/day for 30 days followed by 40 mg/day for the remaining period of treatment. Toxicity consisted mainly of mild to moderate nausea and vomiting (76%), peripheral neuropathy (43%), nephrotoxicity (4%), anemia (16%), leukopenia (58%) and thrombocytopenia (16%). The overall response to the P-TAM combination was 50% (complete response 30%; partial response 20%) with a median duration of 8.5 months (3-42). Sixty-four percent of the P-sensitive and 39% of the P-resistant patients responded (59% and 33%, respectively, for those bearing measurable disease). The overall median survival was 23 (3-48) and 19 months for the patients with measurable disease (20 months for the P-resistant group). This phase II trial confirmed the activity for a re-challenge employing a P compound and TAM in clinically defined P-resistant ovarian cancer patients. The mild toxicity profile and the relatively low cost of the treatment render further investigations on the P-TAM regimen worthwhile.

Assaying the estrogenicity of phytoestrogens in cells of different estrogen sensitive tissues

There is currently much concern that a wide range of both synthetic and naturally occurring environmental chemicals may act as endocrine disruptors (ED), and may adversely affect humans and wildlife. We examined the estrogenic effects of the phytoestrogens daidzein (DAI), equol (EQU) and O-desmethylangolensin (O-DMA), two metabolites of DAI, in three different assays. Binding affinity to the estrogen receptor alpha was 1000-10,000-fold lower compared with the endogenous estrogen estradiol. In the receptor positive cell line MCF-7 the phytoestrogens induced the expression of a reporter gene. The E-SCREEN is based on the estrogen-receptor binding induced proliferation of the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. We also adapted the E-SCREEN for the estrogen-receptor positive human ovarian cancer cell line BG-1. The tested phytoestrogens induced cell proliferation in both cell lines, but not in the receptor negative human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. The phytoestrogen-induced cell proliferation could be blocked by addition of the receptor antagonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT). Combination treatments with the endogenous estrogen estradiol showed competitive effects in MCF-7 cells. These studies demonstrated that the tested phytoestrogens exerted estrogenic responses in cells derived from two different tissues, breast and ovary. Furthermore, we demonstrated that BG-1 cells are a suitable additional cell system to investigate estrogenicity of test compounds.

Estrogen stimulation of ovarian surface epithelial cell proliferation

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecological cancer mortality, and 85-90% of this malignancy originates from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). The etiology of ovarian epithelial cancer is unknown, but a role for estrogens has been suspected. However, the effect of estrogens on OSE cell proliferation remains to be determined. Using the rabbit model, our studies have demonstrated that 17beta-estradiol stimulates OSE cell proliferation and the formation of a papillary ovarian surface morphology similar to that seen in human ovarian serous neoplasms of low malignant potential. Immunohistochemical staining of ovarian tissue sections with an antibody to the estrogen receptor alpha demonstrates its expression in both OSE cells and stromal interstitial cells. In primary ovarian cell cultures, the proliferative response of the epithelial cells to 17beta-estradiol depends on the expression of the estrogen receptor alpha in the epithelial cells. However, when the epithelial cells are grown together with ovarian stromal cells, their proliferative response to this hormone is greatly enhanced, suggesting the involvement of stromal-epithelial interactions. These studies suggest a role for estrogens and the estrogen receptor alpha in OSE growth.

Hormonal interactions in ovarian cancer

According to the epidemiologic literature and the laboratory characterization of receptor content and molecular interactions, there is a relationship between the microenvironment of ovarian cancer and steroid hormones. Advances in our knowledge of the molecular-hormonal nature of ovarian cancer will help in designing a rationale for clinical trials in appropriate subsets of patients. However, currently, development of successful therapies and prevention strategies for women at risk remains a true challenge.

Estrogen action in human ovarian cancer

Evidence is accumulating for a facilitative role for estrogen in ovarian cancer. Although response to antiestrogen therapy has been poor, there is a distinct subset of patients that respond. Strategies for treatment of ovarian cancer would be improved by identification of patients likely to respond to hormonal therapy. Cell culture models that are responsive or resistant to estrogen and antiestrogen may be of value in finding markers that predict responsiveness to hormonal therapy. Several model cell lines have been generated that express ER and proliferate in response to estrogen in vitro. Further studies are needed to better characterize the response of these ER positive cells lines to estrogen in vivo in mouse xenograft models. Expression of many of the same genes are regulated by estrogen in breast and in ovarian cancer cell lines. One exception may be the HER-2/neu oncogene product, which is down-regulated by estrogen in responsive breast carcinoma cells but not in two ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Initial analyses of several estrogen responsive and one resistant cell model suggests the potential value of progesterone receptor presence and low levels of HER-2/neu expression for predicting responsiveness to hormonal therapy. Additional cell models need to be investigated to determine the frequency with which these markers are associated with antiestrogen resistance.

Frontiers of Ovarian Cancer Therapy

Since the majority of patients with ovarian cancer present with advanced stages of disease, more effective systemic approaches are needed to add to the benefits of surgical staging and debulking. New combinations of taxoids with cisplatin have prolonged survival, and other chemotherapeutic agents are being evaluated. Immunotherapy, including intraperitoneal approaches with monoclonal antibodies, cellular therapies and vaccines, hormone therapy with well-known drugs such as tamoxifen, and gene therapy give promise for the future.

Synergistic induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells by tamoxifen and calmodulin inhibitors

Breast cancer cells are relatively resistant to the induction of apoptosis (AP) and drug regimens which readily activate apoptotic death, may enhance the antitumor effect. Rapid and intensive induction of apoptosis was observed in estrogen receptor positive and negative breast cancer cell cultures treated with tamoxifen (TMX) combined with the calmodulin antagonists trifluoperazine (TFP) or W7. TMX (1-5 microM) alone or calmodulin antagonists alone did not induce apoptosis. Importantly, intensive apoptosis was also induced by TMX and TFP in the cells obtained from primary human breast carcinomas. Inhibition of the Ca2+ calmodulin signaling pathway is an effective way to activate apoptotic death in epithelial cells. Combination of TMX with non-toxic calmodulin inhibitors may increase the preventive and therapeutic effects of TMX.

Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and tamoxifen delays the emergence of cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer cell lines

The interaction between cisplatin (cDDP) and tamoxifen (TAM) was evaluated in the human head and neck squamous-carcinoma cell lines UM-SCC-10B and UM-SCC-5. Synergy between cDDP and TAM was demonstrated in the UM-SCC-10B cell line. Concordant with the synergistic effect between cDDP and TAM, the rate of development of resistance to cDDP was delayed when selections were performed in the presence of TAM. However, in the UM-SCC-5 cell line, TAM was neither synergistic nor did it delay the development of cDDP resistance. The difference with respect to the synergistic interaction of cDDP with TAM and the effect on the development of cDDP resistance in the UM-SCC-10B and UM-SCC-5 cell lines was not related to any significant difference in the accumulation of the cDDP analog [3H]-cis-dichloro(ethylenediamine)platinum(II) (DEP), drug sensitivity [concentrations inhibiting colony formation by 50% (IC50 values) were 6.5 and 7.2 microM for cDDP and 3.5 and 3.2 microM for TAM, respectively], the number of estrogen and progesterone receptors (negative in both cell lines), the number of antiestrogen binding sites (404 +/- 85 and 353 +/- 24 fmol/mg protein, respectively), or the affinity of TAM for these binding sites (1.7 and 1.5 nM, respectively). Importantly, however, we demonstrated that TAM can delay the emergence of resistance to cDDP in head and neck carcinomas and that this effect is linked to the nature of the interaction between cDDP and TAM.

Variable effects of tamoxifen on human hematopoietic progenitor cell growth and sensitivity to doxorubicin

To determine the influence of tamoxifen on the drug sensitivity of normal human hematopoietic progenitor cells, T-cell- and adherent-cell depleted human bone marrow mononuclear cells (T-, Ad-) were exposed in vitro to 5 microM tamoxifen for 24 h. The effects of tamoxifen were highly variable, as exposure to tamoxifen produced an increase (97% +/- 12.3%) in the growth of day-12 committed myeloid progenitors (CFU-GM) in only four of ten experiments utilizing bone marrow from different donors. When T-, Ad- myeloid progenitor cells treated with tamoxifen were subsequently exposed to doxorubicin, 7 of 14 experimental samples studied demonstrated a net increase in the number of surviving clonogenic cells as compared with cells exposed to doxorubicin alone. Tamoxifen also stimulated the growth of a more purified (CD34(+)-selected) progenitor cell population in four of four experiments (by 62.5% +/- 4.9%) but did not increase the survival of these cells upon exposure to doxorubicin; in fact, in five of ten experimental samples, tamoxifen enhanced cell sensitivity to doxorubicin. Taken together, these observations indicate that tamoxifen produces variable stimulation of committed myeloid progenitor cell growth in vitro. Furthermore, while under some circumstances, tamoxifen appears to have the capacity to enhance CFU-GM survival in the presence of doxorubicin, this drug combination may also result in enhanced toxicity to normal bone marrow progenitors.

The biology of ovarian cancer development

BACKGROUND

In theory, all the cell types that comprise the human ovary have the potential for malignant transformation. The vast majority of malignant ovarian tumors in the human, however, arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. These cells have important functions during reproductive life; they contribute to follicular rupture and by cell division repair the wound that accompanies ovulation. There has been much speculation that the rapid cycles of cell division associated with wound repair contribute significantly to the development of ovarian cancer. Such speculation is based on the observation that ovarian cancer occurs most frequently at the end of a woman's reproductive life and is associated with nulliparity. It is of potential significance that, unlike most epithelia, these cells are not replaced through replenishment stem cells with the development of one end-stage cell and one cell with continued growth potential. Rather, the division of an ovarian surface epithelial cell yields two daughter cells with equal potential for subsequent growth. Thus, all potential mutations as they accumulate are passed on to near-exponentially expanding subsequent generations of cells that can acquire additional mutations that could confer the malignant phenotype.

METHODS

We have developed a model to test the hypothesis that repeated cell division by ovarian surface epithelial cells contributes to development of malignancy. In this model, rat ovarian surface epithelial cells are isolated and subjected in vitro to repetitious cell division to mimic in a simple way growth of the surface epithelium in vivo.

RESULTS

These cells develop a malignant phenotype based on loss of contact inhibition, the ability for substrate independent growth, tumorigenicity in athymic mice, and cytogenetic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the involvement of tumor suppressor genes in the development of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer, Part I: Biology

The ovary is among the more complex organs of the body and its functions are achieved by numerous cell types. All of these cell types have some tendency to undergo malignant transformation, but the vast majority of ovarian cancers are believed to be the result of malignant transformation of the ovarian surface epithelium. The concept that most ovarian cancer arises from this modified peritoneal mesothelium is credited to Sir Spencer Wells in 1872. Ovarian cancer is the most frequently fatal gynecologic malignancy, and approximately 20,000 cases per year are diagnosed in the United States. Progress in understanding the biology of this disease, including factors involved in its etiology, progression, and tendency to change from a relatively chemotherapy-sensitive tumor to one with marked drug resistance, has been slow. In this review, the complex features of the normal ovarian surface epithelial cells are considered in relation to the etiology and progression of the disease. The hypothesis that incessant or repetitious ovulation contributes to the initiation of the disease is explored in detail based on experimental data, epidemiologic information, and the potential for antioncogene inactivation in this interesting cell type. Lastly, based on the experimental data available, potential mechanisms of resistance to platinum, the cornerstone of aggressive ovarian cancer therapy, are discussed, as are approaches to overcoming drug resistance. It is hoped that the reader will be left with the feeling that the pace of our understanding of the biology of ovarian cancer is increasing at such a rate that answers to the questions of etiology and why chemotherapy often fails will be known in the foreseeable future.

Synergistic antiproliferative activity of tamoxifen and cisplatin on primary ovarian tumours

We looked for the presence of the so-called type II oestrogen binding sites (EBS), in four oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor negative primary ovarian tumours. Moreover, the colony-forming assay was used to evaluate the response of ovarian cancer cells from these primary tumours to tamoxifen and cisplatin used alone or in combination. All tumours contained type II EBS, and tamoxifen was able to compete for [3H] oestradiol binding to these sites. Cisplatin and tamoxifen exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of colony formation in a range of concentrations between 10 and 1000 micrograms/l and 37 and 3710 micrograms/l, respectively. The combination of the two drugs resulted in a synergistic antiproliferative activity, with a potentiation up to and beyond 50-fold. Our results show that in ovarian cancer tamoxifen interacts with type II EBS with an affinity consistent with the concentration effective both in inhibition of colony formation and in synergising cisplatin activity. Based on the experiments performed the action of tamoxifen on cell growth is independent of ER expression, and could be mediated by type II EBS. The possibility that the association of tamoxifen and cisplatin may result in an improved clinical response in ovarian cancer should be investigated.

The growth response of BG-1 ovarian carcinoma cells to estradiol, 4OH-tamoxifen, and tamoxifen: evidence for intrinsic antiestrogen activation

The influence of estrogen (E) and antiestrogen (AES) on the in vitro growth of BG-1 ovarian carcinoma cells, which express steroid receptors was examined (K. R. Geisinger, T. E. Kute, M. J. Pettenati, C. E. Welander, Y. Dennard, L. A. Collins, and M. E. Berens, Characterization of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line with estrogen and progesterone receptors, Cancer 63, 280-288, 1989). All determinations were simultaneously referenced under similar conditions to MCF-7 cells, a well-established cell line for modeling hormonal responses in breast cancer. In "complete" media containing fetal calf serum (FCS, 10%), MCF-7 cell numbers increased approximately 7 x in 7 days, remaining at this level Days 8-15. In contrast, BG-1 cells achieved similar numbers by Day 7, but showed apparent exponential growth over Days 8-15 to 15-20 x. Phenol red-free media containing 10% FCS (less than 20 pg estradiol (E2)/ml by RIA) was used to assess responses to E and AES. Growth of both MCF-7 and BG-1 cells slowed in E-free media. E2 (10 nM) stimulated the growth of both cell lines, yet was responsible for exponential increases during Days 8-15 only in BG-1 cell numbers (50-70 x). The metabolically active AES (4OH-tamoxifen, 50 nM) reduced E2-stimulated MCF-7 growth to 3-4 x, while tamoxifen (50 nM) had no effect. Rescue with 10 microM E2 fully overcame the AES inhibition of MCF-7 proliferation. In contrast, BG-1 cells experienced significant E2-stimulated growth reductions in the presence of either 4OH-tamoxifen or tamoxifen. E2 was observed to rescue BG-1 cells from both of these antagonists. We conclude that BG-1 ovarian carcinoma cells respond in vitro to E and AES. Moreover, by virtue of responses to tamoxifen, BG-1 cells may have an intrinsic capacity to hydroxylate tamoxifen to its active metabolite. This property of ovarian carcinoma cells might be worth exploiting in the design of more effective combination chemotherapy regimens.