Taxol in combination with doxorubicin or etoposide. Possible antagonism in vitro

Co-delivery of paclitaxel and etoposide prodrug by human serum albumin and PLGA nanoparticles: synergistic cytotoxicity in brain tumour cells

The aims of this study were to develop co-delivery systems of paclitaxel (PTX) and etoposide prodrug (4'-O-benzyloxycarbonyl-etoposide, ETP-cbz) based on non-cross-linked human serum albumin (HSA) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles and to evaluate the synergistic potential of these drugs in vitro. The nanoformulations were prepared by the high-pressure homogenisation technique and characterised using DLS, TEM, SEM, AFM, HPLC, CZE, in-vitro release, and cytotoxicity in human and murine glioma cells. All nanoparticles had 90-150 nm in size and negative ζ-potentials. The Neuro2A cells were the most sensitive to both HSA- and PLGA-based co-delivery systems (IC₅₀ 0.024 µM and 0.053 µM, respectively). The drugs' synergistic effect (combination index < 0.9) was observed in the GL261 cells for both types of co-delivery formulations and in the Neuro2A cells for the HSA-based system. These nanodelivery systems may be useful to improve combination chemotherapy for brain tumour treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the non-cross-linked HSA-based co-delivery nanosuspension which was prepared using nab™ technology.

Short and Long-Term Effects of the Exposure of Breast Cancer Cell Lines to Different Ratios of Free or Co-Encapsulated Liposomal Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin

Background: Associating paclitaxel (PTX) to doxorubicin (DXR) is one of the main chemotherapy strategies for breast cancer (BC) management. Protocols currently available consist in administering both drugs on their maximum tolerated dose, not taking into account the possible differences in efficacy due to their combination ratio. In the present study, the short and long-term cytotoxic effects as well as migratory effects of PTX, DXR, and its combinations at 10:1; 1:1 and 1:10 PTX:DXR molar ratios either free or co-encapsulated in liposomes were evaluated against three human BC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and SKBR-3). Method: The MTT assay was used to screen for synergy or antagonism between PTX and DXR and the combination index value was calculated using the CalcuSyn software. Nuclear morphological alterations were evaluated by staining the cells with Hoescht 33342. The investigation of senescence and clonogenicity of BC cell lines exposed to different treatments was also studied. In addition, the ability of these cells to migrate was assessed. Results: Taken together, the results presented herein allow us to suggest that there is no benefit in enhancing the PTX concentration above that of DXR in the combination for any of the three cell lines tested. Conclusion: The developed liposomes co-encapsulating PTX and DXR in different molar ratios retained the biological properties of the mixture of free drugs and are valuable for planning new therapeutic strategies.

Star-Graft Quarterpolymer-Based Polymersomes as Nanocarriers for Co-Delivery of Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Chemotherapeutic Agents

We report the fabrication of polymersomes, using as building blocks star-graft quarterpolymers, composed of hydrophobic polystyrene and pH-sensitive poly(2-vinylpyridine)-b-poly(acrylic acid) (P2VP-b-PAA) arms, emanated from a common nodule, enriched by thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) grafts covalently bonded on the PAA block-arms. These multicompartmental polymersomes were evaluated as nanocarriers for the encapsulation and controlled co-delivery of doxorubicin (hydrophilic) and paclitaxel (hydrophobic) chemotherapeutic agents. The polymersomes can load these drugs in different compartments and can efficiently be internalized in the human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells, delivering their cargo and inducing high cell apoptosis. The release kinetics of both anticancer agents was controlled differently by the environmental conditions (pH and temperature). Enhanced release was observed at the acidic pH 6.0 and under physiological temperature (37 °C). At the same total drug level, co-delivery of these drugs with the polymersomes caused enhanced cytotoxicity and induced significantly higher cell apoptosis in the cancer cell line compared to the polymersomes loaded with either of the two drugs.

Docetaxel Followed by Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase I Study

Aims and Background

Based on the results of a preclinical study, a phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of administering docetaxel followed by gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Study design

Sixteen patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (stages III B-IV) were treated on the 1st day with docetaxel and on the 8th day with gemcitabine. Treatment was repeated every three weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Five groups received docetaxel/gemcitabine (mg/m2): 50/800, 60/800, 60/900, 60/1,000, 70/1,000. All patients and 57 cycles were assessed for toxicity.

Results

The most important side effects were grade IV neutropenia in 4 patients (2 at the 60/1000 level and 2 at the 70/1000 level) and grade III leukopenia and neutropenia without fever in 4 and 6 patients, respectively. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached.

Conclusions

The sequence docetaxel → gemcitabine appears well tolerated and easy to administer. For this reason, a phase II study is ongoing to fully assess its antitumor activity.

Small cell lung carcinoma cell line screen of etoposide/carboplatin plus a third agent

The SCLC combination screen examined a 9-point concentration response of 180 third agents, alone and in combination with etoposide/carboplatin. The predominant effect of adding a third agent to etoposide/carboplatin was additivity. Less than additive effects occurred frequently in SCLC lines sensitive to etoposide/carboplatin. In SCLC lines with little or no response to etoposide/carboplatin, greater than additive SCLC killing occurred over the entire spectrum of SCLC lines but never occurred in all SCLC lines. Exposing SCLC lines to tubulin-targeted agents (paclitaxel or vinorelbine) simultaneously with etoposide/carboplatin resulted primarily in less than additive cell killing. As single agents, nuclear kinase inhibitors including Aurora kinase inhibitors, Kinesin Spindle Protein/EG5 inhibitors, and Polo-like kinase-1 inhibitors were potent cytotoxic agents in SCLC lines; however, simultaneous exposure of the SCLC lines to these agents along with etoposide/carboplatin, generally, resulted in less than additive cell killing. Several classes of agents enhanced the cytotoxicity of etoposide/carboplatin toward the SCLC lines. Exposure of the SCLC lines to the MDM2 inhibitor JNJ-27291199 produced enhanced killing in 80% of the SCLC lines. Chk-1 inhibitors such as rabusertib increased the cytotoxicity of etoposide/carboplatin to the SCLC lines in an additive to greater than additive manner. The combination of GSK-3β inhibitor LY-2090314 with etoposide/carboplatin increased killing in approximately 40% of the SCLC lines. Exposure to the BET bromodomain inhibitor MK-8628 increased the SCLC cell killing by etoposide/carboplatin in 20-25% of the SCLC lines. Only 10-15% of the SCLC lines had an increased response to etoposide/carboplatin when simultaneously exposed to the PARP inhibitor talazoparib.

Prediction of multidimensional drug dose responses based on measurements of drug pairs

Finding potent multidrug combinations against cancer and infections is a pressing therapeutic challenge; however, screening all combinations is difficult because the number of experiments grows exponentially with the number of drugs and doses. To address this, we present a mathematical model that predicts the effects of three or more antibiotics or anticancer drugs at all doses based only on measurements of drug pairs at a few doses, without need for mechanistic information. The model provides accurate predictions on available data for antibiotic combinations, and on experiments presented here on the response matrix of three cancer drugs at eight doses per drug. This approach offers a way to search for effective multidrug combinations using a small number of experiments.

Longitudinal tracking of single live cancer cells to understand cell cycle effects of the nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor

Longitudinal tracking is a powerful approach to understand the biology of single cells. In cancer therapy, outcome is determined at the molecular and cellular scale, yet relationships between cellular response and cell fate are often unknown. The selective inhibitor of nuclear export, selinexor, is in development for the treatment of various cancers. Selinexor covalently binds exportin-1, causing nuclear sequestration of cargo proteins, including key regulators of the cell cycle and apoptosis. The cell cycle effects of selinexor and the relationships between cell cycle effects and cell fates, has not been described for individual cells. Using fluorescent cell cycle indicators we report the majority of cell death after selinexor treatment occurs from a protracted G1-phase and early S-phase. G1- or early S-phase treated cells show the strongest response and either die or arrest, while those treated in late S- or G2-phase progress to mitosis and divide. Importantly, the progeny of cell divisions also die or arrest, mostly in the next G1-phase. Cells that survive selinexor are negative for multiple proliferation biomarkers, indicating a penetrant, arrested state. Selinexor acts quickly, shows strong cell cycle selectivity, and is highly effective at arresting cell growth and inducing death in cancer-derived cells.

Is cell death a critical end point for anticancer therapies or is cytostasis sufficient?

Since the discovery of conventional chemotherapy and the development of new target-based agents, the importance of cytostasis in anticancer activity has been debated. This review examines the relative importance of both cytostasis and cytotoxicity based on both preclinical data and clinical reports. Several limitations of our basic and clinical methods to evaluate cytostasis and cytotoxicity will be highlighted. Molecular mechanisms of cytostasis will be analyzed, including interference with the cell cycle as well as putative links with necrosis and autophagy. Finally, we will cite evidence that most older and newer compounds are both cytostatic and cytotoxic. The relative role of cytostasis and cytotoxicity on future drug screening and clinical development will be explored.

Bcl-XL is qualitatively different from and ten times more effective than Bcl-2 when expressed in a breast cancer cell line

Background

Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL are anti-apoptotic paralogues that inhibit apoptosis elicited by a wide variety of stimuli, and play critical roles in cancer development and resistance to treatment. Many clinical studies have indicated that expression of these anti-apoptotic proteins in tumours is associated with poor prognosis. It has therefore been assumed that in cells the essential difference between Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL involves regulation of expression and that they are otherwise functionally similar. To examine this issue, we have compared the function of the proteins and of mutants of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL specifically targeted to different subcellular sites.

Methods

We generated clones of the human breast cancer line MCF-7 stably expressing known amounts of Bcl-2, or Bcl-XL as determined by quantitative immunoblotting. Clones expressing equivalent amounts of wild-type and mutants of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL with subcellular localization restricted to the cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum or outer mitochondrial membrane were studied in both MCF-7 and Rat-1 fibroblasts. In MCF-7 cells we measured the functional activities of these proteins in preventing apoptosis induced by four different agents (doxorubicin, ceramide, thapsigargin, TNF-α). Etoposide and low serum were used to compare the effect of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and mutants located at the endoplasmic reticulum on induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts.

Results

We noted both qualitative and quantitative differences in the functional activity of these two anti-apoptotic proteins in cells: Bcl-2 localized to the endoplasmic reticulum inhibits apoptosis induced by ceramide and thapsigargin but not by doxorubicin or TNFα, while Bcl-XL at the endoplasmic reticulum is active against all four drugs. In fibroblasts Bcl-2 localized to the ER did not prevent cell death due to etoposide whereas Bcl-XL in the same location did. Finally in MCF-7 cells, Bcl-XL is approximately ten times more active than Bcl-2 in repressing apoptosis induced by doxorubicin. This difference can be manifest as a large difference in clonal survival.

Conclusion

When examined in the same cellular context, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL differ substantially in the potency with which they inhibit apoptosis, mediated in part by differences in the inhibition of specific subcellular pathways.

Endothelin B receptor agonist, IRL 1620, enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of paclitaxel in breast tumor rats

Pharmacological agents that increase tumor blood flow could be utilized to promote the delivery of anti-cancer drugs. We have demonstrated that administration of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to breast tumor bearing rats transiently increased tumor blood flow by stimulating endothelin B (ET(B)) receptors. The present study evaluated the effect of ET(B) receptor agonist, IRL 1620, on breast tumor perfusion, concentration of [3H]paclitaxel in tumor and tissues, and efficacy of paclitaxel in N-methyl nitrosourea induced breast tumor bearing rats. Administration of IRL 1620 (3 and 9 nmol/kg) significantly increased (203 and 140%, respectively) breast tumor perfusion. BQ 788, an ET(B) receptor antagonist, pretreatment completely abolished IRL 1620 induced increase in tumor perfusion. Tumor [3H]paclitaxel concentration was increased by 308% when [3H]paclitaxel was administered 15 min after IRL 1620 (3 nmol/kg) compared to vehicle treated rats. However, IRL 1620 did not increase [3H]paclitaxel concentrations in other organs. Efficacy study showed that paclitaxel (5 mg/kg) administration on every third day for a total of five doses produced 60.0, 4.5 and 0% reduction in tumor volume, tumor progression and complete tumor remission, respectively, compared to saline treated rats. However, paclitaxel (5 mg/kg) when administered 15 min after IRL 1620 (3 nmol/kg) produced 268.9, 210.3 and 20% reduction in tumor volume, tumor progression and complete remission of tumors, respectively, compared to saline treated rats. In conclusion, IRL 1620 significantly enhanced delivery and effectiveness of paclitaxel in an animal model of breast cancer.

Innovative sequence of docetaxel–gemcitabine based on preclinical data in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase I study

Based on our previous preclinical data, a phase I study was designed to investigate the tolerability of a novel sequence, docetaxel (DOC)-gemcitabine (GEM), in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical study: We evaluated the cytotoxicity of DOC and GEM on NSCLC cell lines and assessed the type of interaction between drug activities following different treatment schemes. Clinical study: Fifteen patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received DOC (day 1) and GEM (days 3 and 8) every 21 days. Dose escalation of both agents was used to identify the maximum tolerated dose. The study was closed at the fifth dose level due to the occurrence of three dose-limiting toxicities: grade 4 febrile neutropoenia, persistent grade 2 fever and grade 3 diarrhoea. The most frequent toxicity was neutropoenia. Non haematological toxicities were diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, mucositis and alopoecia. Of the 14 evaluable patients, 1 complete response, 4 partial responses, 4 stable diseases and 5 disease progressions were observed. Based on the results of the present study, a phase II trial is ongoing using the fourth dose levels.

Synergistic effect of a retinoid X receptor-selective ligand bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin) and paclitaxel (Taxol) in mammary carcinoma

We have previously shown that the retinoid X receptor (RXR) ligand bexarotene (LGD1069, Targretin) is efficacious as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent in rat N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU)-induced mammary carcinomas (Cancer Res 58: 479-484, 1998). To determine additional role for bexarotene in breast cancer treatment, we evaluated the effect of bexarotene on the efficacy of paclitaxel (Taxol) treatment in a rat NMU-derived mammary tumor cell line, NMU-417, in vitro and in rat NMU-induced mammary tumors in vivo. Our growth inhibition results showed that the bexarotene/paclitaxel combination produced a concentration-dependent synergy in NMU-417 tumor cell line. Synergistic growth inhibition by the combination was associated with an increase in cell death induced by both agents. In rat NMU-induced mammary tumor model in vivo, the benefit of combination therapy was observed as early as 1 week after treatment and increased as treatment continued. At the end of 6 weeks of treatment, the bexarotene/paclitaxel combination produced an overall objective response rate of 94% compared with a rate of 12% in paclitaxel-treated and 58% in bexarotene-treated animals, an effect that was more than the additive effects produced by single agents. Although both bexarotene alone and the bexarotene/paclitaxel combination reduced tumor multiplicity to similar extent, the combination regimen produced a statistically significant decrease in total tumor burden compared to single agents and untreated controls (two-tailed, p < 0.05). Combination therapy did not further alter body weight nor increase toxicity when compared to single agents. In summary, our results demonstrated the potential of using a RXR selective ligand in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer.

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND

A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination.

METHODS

Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0-1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3-4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Drug interactions with the taxanes: clinical implications

BACKGROUND

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel are among the most active antitumor agents. Clinically important pharmacodynamic interactions have been reported to occur with these agents that are sequence or schedule dependent. Because the taxanes undergo hepatic oxidation via the cytochrome P450 system, pharmacokinetic interactions due to enzyme induction or inhibition can also occur.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline to identify clinically important drug-interactions with the taxanes.

RESULTS

Clinically significant taxane interactions were identified for carboplatin, cisplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel, epirubicin and anticonvulsants. Doxorubicin and epirubicin should be administered 24 h before paclitaxel, and the cumulative anthracycline dose limited to 360 mg/m(2). This will prevent the enhanced toxicities due to sequence and schedule dependent interactions between anthracyclines and paclitaxel. Conversely, paclitaxel should be administered at least 24 h before cisplatin to avoid a decrease in clearance and increase in myelosuppression. With concurrent anticonvulsant therapy, cytochrome p450 enzyme induction results in decreased paclitaxel plasma steady state concentrations, possibly requiring an increased dose of paclitaxel. A number of other drug interactions have been reported in preliminary studies for which clinical significance has yet to be established.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant drug interactions have been reported to occur when paclitaxel is administered with doxorubicin, cisplatin, or anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital).

Drug interactions and cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin, epirubicin, gemcitabine or vinorelbine in breast cancer cell lines and tumor samples

The purpose of this study was to analyze the drug interactions of paclitaxel (PTX) with epirubicin (EPI), carboplatin (CBDCA), gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VIN) in human breast cancer cells and compare the cytotoxic activity of each drug combination in primary breast cancer samples. These experiments were intended to identify the most active agents in combination with PTX, and to provide a preclinical rational for future clinical investigations in breast cancer. Multiple drug effect/combination index (CI) isobologram analysis was applied to combinations of PTX with either CBDCA, EPI, GEM or VIN in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-3 human breast cancer cell lines. Drug concentrations were limited to the ranges achievable in humans in vivo, and the drugs were applied simultaneously at fixed molar ratios for each drug combination. Interactions were assessed at multiple effect levels (IC10-IC90). Additionally, the cytotoxic activity of these combinations was assessed in tumor samples of 50 primary breast cancer patients, utilizing the ATP-tumorchemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). Drug interactions were shown to be strongly dose-related in the human breast cancer cell lines investigated. At clinically relevant concentrations, CBDCA/PTX demonstrated synergistic (MCF-7) or additive (MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3) interactions, and EPI/PTX showed additive (SK-BR-3, MCF-7) and antagonistic (MDA-MB-231) interactions. GEM/PTX and VIN/PTX, however, demonstrated antagonism over multiple dose effect levels at clinically relevant drug concentrations in all three cell lines tested. At plasma peak concentrations, EPI/PTX, CBDCA/PTX, GEM/PTX and VIN/PTX achieved > or = 90% tumor growth inhibition in 93, 86, 63 and 50%, respectively, of primary breast cancer samples investigated with the ATP-TCA. Cumulative dose-response plots of primary breast cancer tumor cells responding in vitro with > or = 90% growth inhibition showed a strong dose dependence for both EPI/PTX and CBDCA/PTX. In conclusion, the current data indicate favorable drug interactions for CBDCA/PTX at clinically relevant drug concentrations in breast cancer cells, and demonstrate superior in vitro cytotoxicity of EPI/PTX and CBDCA/PTX compared to GEM/PTX and VIN/PTX in primary breast cancer cultures.

Drug interactions of paclitaxel and docetaxel and their relevance for the design of combination therapy

The taxanes' interaction with other anticancer drugs have been extensively investigated in in vitro and in animal models as well as in humans due to the outstanding antitumor activity in a broad range of malignancies. Paclitaxel and docetaxel are endowed of a rich and complex pharmacology whereby different pharmacodynamic effects are observed depending on the sequence of their administration in respect with the companion drug, and the type of drug that is combined. Pharmacokinetic interference is often but not always a basis of the pharmacodynamic effect. In addition, the vehicle of clinical formulation, especially Cremophor EL for paclitaxel, influence the pharmacological effect. Finally, new interaction based on as yet unknown mechanisms drive the two taxanes to multiple additive/synergistic relationships with new signal transduction drugs, such as modulators of the epidermal-growth-factor family of receptors and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. The ongoing effort to better understanding such a rich pharmacology is worth continuing in view of designing new and better combinations of the taxanes.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The combination of paclitaxel and etoposide was evaluated in a phase II study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-five patients, median age 61, received treatment with paclitaxel 200 mg/m (2) intravenous over 3 h on day 1, and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily on days 1-5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of nine cycles, or until progression occurred. Twenty-eight patients had stage IV disease, and seven patients had stage IIIA or B disease. There was one complete and seven partial responses (overall response rate, 23%). Two of these responses were in patients with stage III disease (29%) and six in patients with stage IV disease (21%). Median survival was 8.7 months, and 36% of patients were alive at 1 year. There were no treatment-related deaths and little grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity although grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 60% of patients (33% of cycles). There were four episodes of febrile neutropenia. The combination of paclitaxel and oral etoposide is active in advanced NSCLC and can be delivered with acceptable toxicity.

Evaluation of GL331 in combination with paclitaxel: GL331's interference with paclitaxel-induced cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis

Combination of selecting agents that act on different cellular mechanisms is a common strategy in cancer chemotherapy. GL331 is a new potent topoisomerase II (Topo II) poison; distinctly, paclitaxel is a microtubule-interfering cancer chemotherapeutic agent. In this study, we intended to evaluate the efficacy of combining GL331 with paclitaxel in cell killing and apoptotic induction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma NPC-TW01 cells. By MTT and internucleosomal DNA cleavage assays, we found that pretreatment or simultaneous treatment of NPC-TW01 cells with GL331 could significantly interfere with paclitaxel's cell killing and apoptosis-inducing activity. When the administration schedule was reversed, the cytotoxicity of GL331 was attenuated by paclitaxel pretreatment. The anti-cancer activity produced by combining GL331 with paclitaxel was obviously lower than the addition of the activities of two individual agents. NPC-TW01 cells were treated with GL331 and 3H-labeled paclitaxel simultaneously or with GL331 before 3H-labeled paclitaxel. In both conditions, GL331 did not reduce the [3H]paclitaxel level in the cells, suggesting that GL331's interference with paclitaxel's cell-killing and apoptosis-inducing efficacy did not result from any inhibition of cellular uptake or retention of paclitaxel. In addition, we found that GL331-induced perturbation of cell cycle progression dramatically over-rode the patterns of mitotic arrest induced by paclitaxel, and the mechanism could be the inhibition of cyclin B1/CDC2 kinase and MAD2 checkprotein activities.

In vitro preclinical models for a rational design of chemotherapy combinations in human tumors

Today, drug combinations are frequently used in the treatment of cancer to increase therapeutic efficacy. Currently used clinical protocols for cancer combination therapies are mainly obtained empirically or on the basis of results from previous clinical trials. Information obtained from clinical protocols is invaluable, but it is time-consuming, expensive and does not provide data on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of interaction of the drugs used in combination treatments at cellular level. Therefore, in vitro drug combination studies on established cell lines or primary cell cultures play an important role in designing and optimising combination protocols. A variety of in vitro assays and different mathematics models have been developed to investigate cytotoxic effects and to analyse the type of drug interactions. Increased knowledge of the cellular targets of traditional and new drugs and the development of new technologies have resulted in a new role for the in vitro tests which are no longer used only to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of drugs, but also to investigate the interference on cell cycle, induction of apoptosis and molecular or biochemical interactions. A review on in vitro preclinical tests used to evaluate the effects of drug combinations and to design the rationale of combined chemotherapy protocols is presented.

The relevance of drug sequence in combination chemotherapy

The concept of combining chemotherapeutic agents to increase the cytotoxic efficacy has evolved greatly over the past several years. In the past, the rationale for combination chemotherapy centered on attacking different biochemical targets, overcoming drug resistance in heterogenous tumors, and increasing the dose-density of combination chemotherapy to take advantage of tumor growth kinetics. The overall goal was to improve clinical efficacy with acceptable clinical toxicity. It is now apparent that the sequence of drug administration can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. These sequence-dependent effects can be explained by chemotherapy-induced cell cycle perturbations, or by pharmacodynamic interactions between the agents in combination. In this review, we focus on drug combinations with taxanes and camptothecins, which we believe best illustrate the importance of the cell cycle and pharmacologic interactions in the sequential administration of chemotherapy. As our understanding of the cell cycle grows, our ability to appropriately sequence chemotherapy can have a great impact on the treatment of human cancers. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Sequence dependent effect of paclitaxel on gemcitabine metabolism in relation to cell cycle and cytotoxicity in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are active agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To optimize treatment drug combinations, simultaneously and 4 and 24 h intervals, were studied using DNA flow cytometry and multiple drug effect analysis in the NSCLC cell lines H460, H322 and Lewis Lung. All combinations resulted in comparable cytotoxicity, varying from additivity to antagonism (combination index: 1.0-2.6). Gemcitabine caused a S (48%) and G1 (64%) arrest at IC-50 and 10 x IC-50 concentrations, respectively. Paclitaxel induced G2/M arrest (70%) which was maximal within 24 h at 10 x IC-50. Simultaneous treatment increased S-phase arrest, while at the 24 h interval after 72 h the first drug seemed to dominate the effect. Apoptosis was more pronounced when paclitaxel preceded gemcitabine (20% for both intervals) as compared to the reverse sequence (8%, P = 0.173 for the 4 h and 12%, P = 0.051 for the 24 h time interval). In H460 cells, paclitaxel increased 2-fold the accumulation of dFdCTP, the active metabolite of gemcitabine, in contrast to H322 cells. Paclitaxel did not affect deoxycytidine kinase levels, but ribonucleotide levels increased possibly explaining the increase in dFdCTP. Paclitaxel did not affect gemcitabine incorporation into DNA, but seemed to increase incorporation into RNA. Gemcitabine almost completely inhibited DNA synthesis in both cell lines (70-89%), while paclitaxel had a minor effect and did not increase that of gemcitabine. In conclusion, various gemcitabine-paclitaxel combinations did not show sequence dependent cytotoxic effects; all combinations were not more than additive. However, since paclitaxel increased dFdCTP accumulation, gemcitabine incorporation into RNA and the apoptotic index, the administration of paclitaxel prior to gemcitabine might be favourable as compared to reversed sequences.

Hyperthermia and paclitaxel--epirubicin chemotherapy: enhanced cytotoxic effect in a murine mammary adenocarcinoma

Multimodality therapy is considered of great interest in the treatment of locally advanced solid tumours. In previous experiments, paclitaxel (TX) and epirubicin (EP) were combined with different schedules, obtaining a superadditive effect on the growth of a murine mammary carcinoma. In the present study, the authors have analysed the possible use of hyperthermia (HT) to increase the efficacy of TX and EP combinations. Tumours were transplanted into the right hind foot of female hybrid (C3D2F1) mice. Both TX and EP were administered i.p in two different doses. Hyperthermia was applied using a water bath at 43.2 degrees C for 1 h. Results were analysed in terms of Tumour Growth Delay (TGD). The maximum tolerated doses in combined protocols were TX 45 mg/kg and EP 9 mg/kg, with an interval time of 24h between the two administrations. TGDs of some of the schedules performed are reported: EP + HT = 11 days, TX + HT = 16 days, TX + EP (with an interval time of 24 h) = 14 days, and TX + EP + HT = 22 days. In the experimental model, HT significantly increases the effects of both TX and EP. TX + EP + HT treatment is the most effective (significantly different from TX + EP), but not in a significant way when compared to TX + HT treatment. These results suggest the possible use of a TX + HT protocol for local tumour response, whereas EP could be added in order to achieve a better systemic control.

Docetaxel and gemcitabine activity in NSCLC cell lines and in primary cultures from human lung cancer

The activity of the following drugs was investigated in two established NSCLC cell lines: docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, doxorubicin (0.01, 0.1, 1 microg ml(-1)), cisplatin, ifosfamide (1, 2, 3 microg ml(-1)) and carboplatin (2, 4, 6 microg ml(-1)). The cytotoxic activity was evaluated by the sulphorhodamine B assay. The two most active drugs, docetaxel and gemcitabine, used singly and in association, were investigated as a function of treatment schedule. The sequence docetaxel-->gemcitabine produced only a weak synergistic interaction in RAL but a strong synergism in CAEP cells. The synergistic interaction increased in both cell lines after a 48-h washout between the drug administrations. Flow cytometric analysis showed that in docetaxel-->gemcitabine sequence, docetaxel produced a block in G2/M phase and, after 48 h, provided gemcitabine with a large fraction of recovered synchronized cells in the G1/S boundary, which is the specific target phase for gemcitabine. Conversely, simultaneous treatment induced an antagonistic effect in both cell lines, and the sequential scheme gemcitabine-->docetaxel produced a weak synergistic effect only in RAL cells. Moreover, the synergistic interaction disappeared when washout periods of 24 or 48 h between two drug administrations were adopted. The synergistic activity of docetaxel-->48-h washout-->gemcitabine was confirmed in 11 of 14 primary cultures, which represents an important means of validating experimental results before translating them into clinical practice.

Sequence-dependent antagonism between fluorouracil and paclitaxel in human breast cancer cells

The effects of 24-hr exposures to 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and paclitaxel in various sequences were studied in MCF-7 breast cancer cells to determine an optimal schedule for possible clinical use. In clonogenic assays, pre-exposure to FUra followed by paclitaxel resulted in marked antagonism, while sequential paclitaxel followed by FUra was optimal. Concurrent or pre-exposure to paclitaxel did not affect [3H]FUra metabolism, [3H]FUra-RNA incorporation, or the extent of FUra-mediated thymidylate synthase inhibition. Paclitaxel led to G2/M phase accumulation that persisted for up to 24 hr after drug exposure, while a 24-hr FUra exposure produced S-phase accumulation. FUra pre-exposure diminished paclitaxel-associated G2/M phase block, whereas subsequent exposure to FUra after paclitaxel did not. FUra exposure resulted in transient induction of p53 and p21, which returned to basal levels 24 hr after drug removal. p53 and p21 protein content also increased markedly during paclitaxel exposure, accompanied by phosphorylation of Bcl-2. Double-stranded DNA fragmentation (approximately 50 kb) was seen at 48 hr when cells were exposed to paclitaxel for an initial 24-hr period. Paclitaxel-associated DNA fragmentation was not prevented by concurrent or subsequent exposure to FUra. Thus, paclitaxel-mediated G2/M phase arrest appeared to be a crucial step in induction of DNA fragmentation. Since an initial 24-hr paclitaxel exposure did not interfere with subsequent FUra metabolism or thymidylate synthase inhibition, and delayed exposure to FUra did not impede either paclitaxel-mediated induction of mitotic blockade or DNA fragmentation, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by FUra is recommended for clinical trials.

Paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion with doxorubicin by 48-hour infusion as initial therapy for metastatic breast cancer: phase I results

PURPOSE

We and others have demonstrated the antineoplastic efficacy of paclitaxel as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer. We performed this phase I trial to evaluate the combination of paclitaxel with doxorubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer for which this was the initial cytotoxic treatment. They may have received adjuvant chemotherapy with other drugs. The study had four parts. In part 1, the patients received paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion followed by doxorubicin by 48-hour infusion. The paclitaxel dose was to be escalated from a starting dose of 125 mg/m2, and the doxorubicin dose was to remain constant at 60 mg/m2 with treatment repeated every three weeks. The results of part 1 prompted part 2 which was a study of the reverse sequence. Part 3 was a formal study of pharmacology and has been reported (J Clin Oncol 14: 2713-21, 1996). In part 4, patients received doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 by bolus followed by paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion for courses 1 and 2. In all subsequent courses doxorubicin was administered by 48-hour infusion. All patients in all four parts of the study had baseline cardiac scans. All patients received standard premedication for paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were treated in all four parts of the study. In part 1 (10 patients), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was paclitaxel 125 mg/m2/24 hours followed by doxorubicin 48 mg/m2/48 hours as defined by dose-limiting mucositis and neutropenic fever which occurred at the starting dose. For part 2 (21 patients), the MTD was doxorubicin 60 mg/m2/48 hours followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/24 hours. In part 4 (seven patients), the MTD was doxorubicin 50 mg/m2/bolus followed by paclitaxel 135 mg/m2/24 hours. In parts 2 and 4, the dose-limiting toxic effect was neutropenia. Of the entire cohort of 48 patients, seven (15%) had a complete response (one persists at five years without intervening therapy), 26 (54%) had a partial response for an objective response rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 54%-81%). The median follow-up of all living patients is 38+ months (range 20+ to 62+); the median response duration is seven months (range 2-33.7+); the median overall survival is 20.5 months (range 5-54+). The median time to progression is 9.6 months (range 1-33.7+ months). Two patients developed congestive heart failure, one at 24 months after her final dose of doxorubicin which amounted to a cumulative lifetime total doxorubicin dose of 870 mg/m2, one after a total of 660 mg/m2. In both, cardiac symptoms were controlled with medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of paclitaxel/24 hours with doxorubicin/48 hours is an effective antineoplastic treatment for metastatic breast cancer. However, the incidence of complete response, the median overall survival, and time to progression were not greater than for standard doxorubicin-based combinations. Additionally, a sequence-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and doxorubicin, given in the schedule described here, was defined. Other strategies and schedules should be evaluated to maximize the antineoplastic efficacy of these two potent agents.

Combined effect of vitamin D3 analogs and paclitaxel on the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vivo

Vitamin D3 analogs and paclitaxel (Taxol) are able to inhibit the in vitro growth of a variety of malignant cells including breast cancer cells. These two compounds decrease growth by different mechanisms and they have nonoverlapping toxicities. We examined the abilities of three vitamin D3 compounds to inhibit growth of a human mammary cancer (MCF-7) in BNX triple immunodeficient mice either alone or with Taxol. Vitamin D3 analogs were 1,25(OH)2D3 (code name, Compound C), 1,25(OH)2-16-ene-23-yne-19-nor-26,27-F6-D3 (Compound LH), and 24a,26a,27a,-trihomo-22,24-diene-1,25(OH)2D3 (EB1089). At the doses chosen, the antitumor effect of vitamin D3 analogs alone was greater than that of Taxol alone, and an additive effect was observed when a vitamin D3 analog and Taxol were administered together. EB1089 was the most potent compound, and the EB1089 plus Taxol was the most active combination, decreasing the tumor mass nearly 4-fold compared to controls. Weight-gain in each of the experimental cohorts at the end of the study was less than the control group, but the gain was significantly less in only two experimental groups (those receiving either EB1089 or Compound C plus Taxol). None of the animals became hypercalcemic, and their complete blood counts, serum electrolyte analyses, and liver and renal functions were all fairly similar and within the normal range. In summary, this combination of a vitamin D3 analog and Taxol has the potential to be a therapy for breast cancer.

Schedule-dependent and -independent antitumor activity of paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy against M-109 murine lung carcinoma in vivo

The established antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel against a variety of human tumors has led to pre-clinical and clinical studies to develop the paclitaxel-based combination regimens. We examined in vivo the antitumor activity and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel and each of 8 antitumor agents, currently in clinical use, against M-109 murine lung carcinoma implanted subcutaneously into male CDF1 mice. Paclitaxel given intravenously at 24 mg/kg/day on a schedule of consecutive daily injections for 5 days (d1-5) induced reproducibly, in 6 experiments, a significant (37-82%) increase in the survival time of tumor-bearing mice over saline-treated control mice. Cisplatin at 4 and 2 mg/kg/day given intravenously on the same treatment schedule showed no significant antitumor activity when given alone; however, the combination of paclitaxel at 24 mg/kg/day (d1-5) followed by cisplatin at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day (d6-10) induced a significant (P < 0.05) prolongation of the survival time of tumor-bearing mice compared with the group given paclitaxel alone. On the other hand, treatment with these drugs on the reverse sequence caused toxic deaths of all mice. Such sequence-dependent toxic death of mice was also observed with the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin, etoposide or methotrexate. The combination of paclitaxel and adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, ranimustine or vinblastine (VLB) showed a sequence-independent antitumor activity and a more-than-additive therapeutic effect was observed with the combination of paclitaxel and either VLB or ranimustine. Although the drug administration schedules used here may not be directly applicable to the clinic, knowledge of the nature of the sequence-dependency in paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy should be useful in the design of clinical trials.

Antitumor activity of paclitaxel and epirubicin in human breast carcinoma, R-27

The antitumor effect of paclitaxel, epirubicin, and both in combination was tested using R-27, an estrogen receptor-positive human breast carcinoma. In an in vivo study using nude mice both drugs showed an additive effect, whereas they showed a supraadditive pattern in in vitro MTT assay. The combination of paclitaxel and epirubicin may enhance the antitumor effect on breast carcinoma.

Cell cycle dependency of 67gallium uptake and cytotoxicity in human cell lines of hematological malignancies

67Gallium (67Ga) is a radionuclide which accumulates in hematological malignancies and is used for diagnostic imaging. We investigated in this in vitro study the cell cycle dependency of cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of 67Ga. Cell cycle synchronization of cells was achieved by counterflow centrifugal elutriation and the use of cytostatic drugs. The human lymphoma cell lines U-937 and U-715 were used and in elutriation experiments we also used the leukemic cell line HL-60. The transferrin receptor (CD71) expression, 67Ga uptake and cell proliferation inhibition were the parameters measured. We also studied cytotoxicity in various schedules for combination of 67Ga and drugs and the residual proliferative capacity was measured. The CD71 expression in the three cell lines increased from 106-177% on S phase cells and from 118-233% on G2M cells, as compared to the G0/G1 cell fraction. The 67Ga uptake varied from 108-127% for S cells and 128-139% for G2M cells. The drugs chosen induced cell cycle phase accumulation in S and/or G2M phase during preincubation. 67Ga preincubation induced accumulation in the G2M phase. Almost all combinations of 67Ga and drugs resulted in a non-interactive effect, except for methotrexate which resulted in an antagonistic effect. No preferential effect of any of the incubation schemes was seen. CD71 expression and 67Ga uptake were increased in S and G2M cells. Combination of 67Ga with drugs which arrest cells in these cell cycle phases did not result in a change in cytotoxicity. However, these results implicate that 67Ga and the cytostatic drugs tested except for methotrexate might be used together or sequentially in therapy.

Etoposide and doxorubicin antagonize the in vitro activity of paclitaxel in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines

GOAL

To explore in vitro interactions of paclitaxel with other agents also active against non-small cell lung cancer in the hope of identifying promising combinations for clinical evaluation.

METHODS

We measured the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel when used alone or in combination with vinblastine, cisplatin, etoposide or doxorubicin in final concentrations covering 3-4 Logs in up to five cell lines using a 96-well plate MTT assay. Drug interactions were analyzed with the isobologram method of Steel and Peckham and bidimensional plots.

RESULTS

We detected no interactions between paclitaxel and cisplatin in two cell lines. Despite sharing a molecular site of action, there were no interactions between paclitaxel and vinblastine in two cell lines. In contrast, significant antagonism was detected between paclitaxel and etoposide or doxorubicin in 4/5 cell lines tested.

CONCLUSIONS

We failed to identify potentially synergistic paclitaxel-based combinations for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Whether the observed in vitro antagonism between paclitaxel and etoposide or doxorubicin predicts for similar interaction in the clinical use of these drugs in combination is unknown.

Schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and doxorubicin in human cancer cell lines in vitro

The schedule-dependent interaction of paclitaxel and doxorubicin was evaluated in four human cancer cell lines. The cells were exposed simultaneously or sequentially to the two agents for 24 h, and were then incubated in drug-free medium for 4 and 3 days, respectively. The cell growth inhibitions were determined by the MTT assay. The cytotoxic interactions at the IC80 level were evaluated by the isobologram method of Steel and Peckham. In non-small cell lung cancer A549, breast cancer MCF7 and colon cancer WiDr cells, antagonistic effects were observed for the paclitaxel and doxorubicin combination on simultaneous exposure to the two agents and on sequential exposure to doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel, while additive effects were observed for the combination on sequential exposure to paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin. In ovarian cancer PA1 cells, additive effects were observed for all schedules. These findings suggest that sequential administration of paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin may be the most suitable sequence, while the simultaneous administration of the two agents and the sequential administration of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel may result in less tumour cell kill than anticipated. Further preclinical and clinical studies are required to elucidate the relationship between paclitaxel and doxorubicin with regard to both antitumour activity and toxicity.

Effects of Taxol on choriocarcinoma cells

OBJECTIVE

Taxol (Bristol-Myers Squibb) (paclitaxel) has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of cell growth for a variety of tumors. We were interested in the antiproliferative efficacy and biologic properties of this novel antineoplastic agent in choriocarcinoma cells.

STUDY DESIGN

Human choriocarcinoma cell lines JAR and BeWo were cultured as monolayers and treated with Taxol.

RESULTS

Proliferation of JAR and BeWo cells was inhibited by Taxol in a dose-related manner and 1 to 3 nmol/L was sufficient to achieve 50% growth reduction. This effect was accompanied by a marked induction of human chorionic gonadotropin secretion. The effect on human chorionic gonadotropin secretion was dependent on intact protein biosynthesis but not mediated by augmented messenger ribonucleic acid expression. In these choriocarcinoma cells Taxol promoted differentiation as shown by an increase in syncytiotrophoblastic-like cells. Combination of Taxol with either etoposide or methotrexate resulted in antagonistic growth inhibition.

CONCLUSION

Taxol is a highly effective antineoplastic agent in choriocarcinoma cells, and clinical trials in refractory disease would therefore be warranted. However, substances other than etoposide or methotrexate should be evaluated for combined treatment. In addition to growth inhibition, differentiation is also induced by Taxol, as shown by increased human chorionic gonadotropin secretion and changed morphologic features.

Lack of radiosensitization after paclitaxel treatment of three human carcinoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have suggested radiosensitizing effects of paclitaxel, a microtubular inhibitor. To test the universality of this finding, the interaction between paclitaxel and radiation treatment of cell lines derived from three common human carcinomas MCF-7 (breast cancer); DUT-145 (prostate cancer); and HT-29 (colon cancer) was evaluated. The study focused on the ability of paclitaxel to block cells at the G2-M phase of the cell cycle and potentially enhance the radiation sensitivity of the cells.

METHODS

All cell lines were exposed to three different clinically achievable paclitaxel concentrations ranging from 2 nM to 25 nM. Paclitaxel pretreatment for 12 and 24 hours before radiation was tested in all three cell lines. The radiation dose ranged from 0 to 8 Gy delivered in a single fraction. Cellular survival after treatment with paclitaxel and/or radiation was determined by clonogenic assay. Cell cycle distribution as determined by flow cytometry was performed after various dose-time combinations of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Cytotoxicity studies with paclitaxel alone demonstrated a time-dependent and dose-dependent survival relationship for all three cell lines. Resultant surviving fractions were in the range of 5 to 90% after 24-hour exposure to paclitaxel alone. The interaction between paclitaxel and radiation was primarily additive in each of the three cell lines for all paclitaxel dose-time combinations studied. Flow cytometric analysis failed to reveal a prominent G2-M block in all three cell lines after paclitaxel treatment for 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel lacked a radiosensitizing effect on MCF-7, DUT-145, and HT-29 cells in this study. These results should be considered when designing clinical trials that use paclitaxel as a potential radiosensitizer of certain human carcinomas.

Etoposide: twenty years later

Since the beginning of its clinical development 20 years ago, etoposide has become an important and widely used agent in clinical oncology. Its integral role in the treatment of germ cell tumors and small-cell lung cancer seems unlikely to diminish in the future, and its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and in various high dose regimens will probably continue to increase. Active investigation continues regarding the optimal dose and schedule of etoposide, and it is likely that these investigations will result in further improvement of its clinical activity in patients with sensitive tumor types. Continued clinical investigation may result in the identification of active etoposide containing combination regimens for ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and some of the childhood malignancies. Exciting possibilities for the future include exploration of etoposide in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitors, as well as the development of drugs to reverse drug resistance. During the next 10 years, the applications and importance of this unique drug will continue to increase.

Taxanes: a new class of antitumor agents

Taxanes belong to a new group of antineoplastic agents with a novel mechanism of action for a cytotoxic drug. They promote microtubule assembly and stabilize the microtubules. Paclitaxel, the first agent in this group to become available, was isolated from the Pacific yew, Taxus brevifolia, in 1971. In preclinical and clinical studies, paclitaxel and its semisynthetic analog docetaxel exhibit significant antitumor activity. This review deals with the physicochemical properties, pharmacology, and results of preclinical and clinical trials of the taxanes.

Current status of paclitaxel in the treatment of breast cancer

Paclitaxel is a highly active single agent as therapy for previously untreated as well as doxorubicin-refractory metastatic breast cancer, with associated response rates of 62% and 20-48%, respectively. Complete responses with paclitaxel occur chiefly in breast cancer patients whose metastatic disease has not been previously treated with chemotherapy. Early data suggest a possible dose-response relationship for paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer, but the optimal dose has not yet been defined. The optimal duration of infusional paclitaxel treatment is also not yet known. A study of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in the treatment of doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients has demonstrated a 48% response rate suggesting that prolonged exposures to paclitaxel may offer a therapeutic advantage. Randomized trials of 3- vs 96-hour paclitaxel are ongoing or planned. The relative efficacy of paclitaxel versus standard chemotherapy as front-line or salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer is currently under study. In addition, two randomized trials are under way in node positive breast cancer patients to study whether treatment with paclitaxel following standard or high dose doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide adjuvant therapy results in improved patient benefit. Combining paclitaxel with other active agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is an area of active investigation. Combined paclitaxel and doxorubicin, administered concurrently or sequentially, is associated with modest complete response rates in metastatic breast cancer patients. Sequential paclitaxel-->doxorubicin administration is associated with more mucositis than is doxorubicin-->paclitaxel when paclitaxel is administered over 24 hours. High doses of cyclophosphamide can be combined with 24- or 72-hour infusional paclitaxel, and phase II studies of this combination are warranted. Early data suggest that administering biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin to previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients is associated with high response rates, and confirmatory studies of this combination and schedule are planned. Preclinical data suggest that cell cycle considerations may be important in combining doxorubicin and possibly other agents with paclitaxel. Paclitaxel is an excellent substrate for P-glycoprotein, the protein product of the multidrug resistance-1 (mdr-1) gene, and phase I trials are under way combining paclitaxel with several known blockers of Pgp function. Finally, pilot studies are under way to determine whether the radiation sensitizing effects of paclitaxel can be exploited as part of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Paclitaxel. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of cancer

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent with a novel mechanism of action. It promotes polymerisation of tubulin dimers to form microtubules and stabilises microtubules by preventing depolymerisation. In noncomparative trials, continuous infusion of paclitaxel 110 to 300 mg/m2 over 3 to 96 hours every 3 to 4 weeks produced a complete or partial response in 16 to 48% of patients with ovarian cancer and 25 to 61.5% of patients with metastatic breast cancer, many of whom were refractory to treatment with cisplatin or doxorubicin, respectively. 23 to 100% of patients with ovarian cancer achieved complete or partial responses with paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, altretamine and/or doxorubicin. Similarly, response rates of 30 to 100% were observed with paclitaxel plus doxorubicin, cisplatin, mitoxantrone and/or cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Comparative trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer showed paclitaxel therapy to produce greater response rates than treatment with parenteral hydroxyurea (71 vs 0%) or cyclophosphamide (when both agents were combined with cisplatin) [79 vs 63%]. Paclitaxel was also more effective than mitomycin in 50 patients with previously untreated breast cancer (partial response in 20 vs 4% of patients). Paclitaxel therapy also produced promising results in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, malignant melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), germ cell cancer, urothelial cancer, oesophageal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma, and was successfully combined with cisplatin, carboplatin and/or etoposide in patients with NSCLC, SCLC or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Hypersensitivity reactions were initially a concern with administration of paclitaxel, although current dosage regimens have reduced the incidence of these events to less than 5%. The major dose-limiting adverse effects of paclitaxel are leucopenia (neutropenia) and peripheral neuropathy. Other haematological toxicity was generally mild. Cardiac toxicity was reported in small numbers of patients and most patients developed total alopecia. Several aspects of paclitaxel use remain to be clarified, including the optimal treatment schedule and infusion time, confirmation of the tolerability profile and efficacy of combination regimens in an expanded range of malignancies. Long term follow-up of paclitaxel recipients will also allow the effects of the drug on patient survival to be determined. Nevertheless, paclitaxel is a promising addition to the current therapies available, with significant activity reported in patients with advanced ovarian or breast cancer or other types of tumors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel

Paclitaxel is a new anticancer agent showing significant promise as therapy for solid tumours and leukaemia, given alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Paclitaxel concentrations in biological specimens can be measured using high performance liquid chromatography, or more recently by immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic studies in which adults have been administered pacliaxel intravenously over 1 to 96 hours have demonstrated the following pharmacokinetic characteristics: extensive tissue distribution; high plasma protein binding (approximately 90 to 95%); variable systemic clearance, with average clearances ranging from 87 to 503 ml/min/m2 (5.2 to 30.2 L/h/m2); and minimal renal excretion of parent drug (< 10%). In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that paclitaxel is extensively metabolised by the liver to 3 primary metabolites. Cytochrome P450 enzymes of the CYP3A and CYP2C subfamilies appear to be involved in hepatic metabolism of paclitaxel. Although early reports suggested that paclitaxel has first-order pharmacokinetics, some recent trials in children and adults suggest that its elimination is saturable. The clinical importance of saturable elimination would be greatest when large dosages are administered and/or the drug is infused over a shorter period of time. In these situations, achievable plasma concentrations are likely to exceed the affinity constant for elimination (Km). Thus, small changes in dosage or infusion duration may result in disproportionately large alterations in paclitaxel systemic exposure, potentially influencing patient response. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel has demonstrated that paclitaxel clearance is apparently sequence dependent. Patients administered cisplatin prior to paclitaxel had lower clearances and greater clinical toxicity than patients receiving paclitaxel before cisplatin. Additional pharmacodynamic analyses have shown nonhaematological and haematological toxicity to correlate better with parameters of paclitaxel exposure (e.g. area under the plasma concentration-time curve, duration of plasma concentrations exceeding 0.1 mumol/L) than with the administered dosage.

The influence of Cremophor EL on the cell cycle effects of paclitaxel (Taxol) in human tumor cell lines

We have performed DNA flow analysis, mitotic index studies, time-lapse photography, and paclitaxel uptake studies of human tumor cell lines exposed to paclitaxel. DNA flow analysis demonstrated that cells began accumulating in G2/M within 6 hrs of exposure to paclitaxel; by 12 hrs over 50% of cells accumulated in G2/M at all concentrations tested. After 24 hrs of exposure to 10 nM paclitaxel, cells underwent non-uniform mitotic division resulting in multinucleated cells. Of cells treated with 30 nM to 1000 nM paclitaxel, 75% to 85% remained blocked in G2/M for up to 72 hrs. Although a large proportion of cells treated with higher concentrations of paclitaxel (10,000 nM) was blocked in G2/M, a significant proportion (10% to 40%) of these cells was also in G1. Cells exposed to lower concentrations of paclitaxel (10 nM to 1000 nM) in medium containing 0.135% (v/v) Cremophor EL also had a relatively large proportion in G1. Mitotic index studies demonstrated that the paclitaxel-induced G2/M block was initially a mitotic block and that cells remained in mitosis for up to 24 hrs. With additional time of exposure to paclitaxel, mitotic index and time-lapse studies indicated that cells attempted to complete mitosis; however, cytokinesis was inhibited and cells became multinucleated. Time-lapse photography revealed that paclitaxel markedly prolonged the time in mitosis from 0.5 hr to 15 hr. High levels of Cremophor EL (0.135% v/v) markedly reduced the number of cells in mitosis but did not alter the mitotic delay induced by paclitaxel. 3H-paclitaxel uptake studies revealed that high concentrations of Cremophor EL did reduce the rate of uptake of paclitaxel into cells but had little effect on total paclitaxel accumulation. These results confirm that paclitaxel has striking effects on the cell cycle and show that high concentrations of Cremophor EL are capable of inducing a cell cycle block distinct from the mitotic block seen with paclitaxel. These results also demonstrate that cells exposed to paclitaxel for longer than 24 hours attempt to complete mitosis but the process of cytokinesis is inhibited. Together with cytotoxicity data, these results indicate that entry into and exit out of mitosis are prerequisites for paclitaxel cytotoxicity.

Paclitaxel (taxol)

Paclitaxel is a novel antineoplastic that effects cytotoxicity by promoting intracellular tubulin polymerization and stabilizes abnormal microtubule structures against depolymerization. Although its clinical development had been hampered by misconceptions about its pharmacology, its scarcity, difficulties extracting it from its natural source, formulation problems, and frequent severe hypersensitivity reactions, paclitaxel recently was approved for treatment-refractory ovarian cancer. Two major adverse effects are dosage- and schedule-related myelosuppression and mucositis. Neurotoxicity is directly related to both the individual and cumulative doses. Other relevant toxicities are hypersensitivity reactions, effects on cardiac rate and rhythm, arthralgias and myalgias, generalized hair loss, and mild nausea and emesis. Continuing clinical studies will evaluate paclitaxel as initial therapy for ovarian cancer and its utility in other malignancies. In addition, major efforts are under way to develop alternative sources to increase the availability of taxene analogs and reduce our dependence on yew species.