Surgical treatment options for colorectal cancer

Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics

Deciphering the principles and mechanisms by which gene activity orchestrates complex cellular arrangements in multicellular organisms has far-reaching implications for research in the life sciences. Recent technological advances in next-generation sequencing- and imaging-based approaches have established the power of spatial transcriptomics to measure expression levels of all or most genes systematically throughout tissue space, and have been adopted to generate biological insights in neuroscience, development and plant biology as well as to investigate a range of disease contexts, including cancer. Similar to datasets made possible by genomic sequencing and population health surveys, the large-scale atlases generated by this technology lend themselves to exploratory data analysis for hypothesis generation. Here we review spatial transcriptomic technologies and describe the repertoire of operations available for paths of analysis of the resulting data. Spatial transcriptomics can also be deployed for hypothesis testing using experimental designs that compare time points or conditions-including genetic or environmental perturbations. Finally, spatial transcriptomic data are naturally amenable to integration with other data modalities, providing an expandable framework for insight into tissue organization.

Is Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy in Addition to Surgery Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Elderly? A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study

INTRODUCTION

Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for Stages II and III rectal cancer recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unclear whether therapies in addition to surgery are truly beneficial in elderly patients. Our aim was to compare the survival of patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer undergoing curative intent surgery with or without additional therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB 2006-2011) was queried for patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer. The primary outcome was overall survival. Patients were stratified based upon therapy group. Univariate group comparisons were made. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The query yielded 3098 patients over 80 with Stage II (N = 1566) or Stage III (N = 1532) disease. Approximately, half of the patients received surgery only. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved survival for patients receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy in addition to surgery, but there was no significant difference between those that received guideline concordant care (GCC), neoadjuvant chemoradiation only, or post-operative chemotherapy only. Cox proportional hazard modeling identified age >90 and margin positivity as independent risk factors for decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of NCDB data for Stages II and III rectal cancer in patients over 80 shows a survival benefit of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy over surgery alone. There does not appear to be a difference in survival between patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, post-resection adjuvant chemotherapy, or GCC.

Racial differences in colorectal cancer survival in the Detroit Metropolitan Area

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma is the second most common cause of cancer death with African Americans having lower survival compared with White Americans. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of demographics, clinical factors, and socioeconomic status (SES) on racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival in the Detroit Metropolitan Area.

METHODS

The study population included 9078 individuals with primary invasive colorectal cancer identified between 1988 and 1992 through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Demographics, clinical information, and survival were obtained through SEER. SES was categorized using occupation, educational level, and poverty status at the census tract level. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare overall survival by race.

RESULTS

African Americans were more likely to be diagnosed with stage IV disease (P < .001), and to reside within poor census tracts (P < .001) compared with White Americans. Unadjusted analysis showed that African Americans had a significantly higher risk of death compared with their White American counterparts (hazards ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.20). After adjusting for age, marital status, sex, SES group, TNM stage, and treatment, race was no longer significantly associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92-1.09). Similar results were seen with colorectal cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival dissipate after adjusting for other demographic and clinical factors. These results can potentially affect medical guidelines regarding screening and treatment, and possibly influence public health policies that can have a positive impact on equalizing racial differences in access to care.

Feasibility of single-stage resection and primary anastomosis in patients with acute noncomplicated sigmoid volvulus

BACKGROUND

The management of sigmoid volvulus remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of treating sigmoid volvulus by using a single-stage resection and anastomosis versus a 2-stage approach.

METHODS

A total of 136 patients with noncomplicated sigmoid volvulus who had undergone emergency surgery within the last 15 years were evaluated retrospectively. Sigmoid resection plus Hartmann colostomy was performed in 45 patients, and sigmoid resection plus primary anastomosis was performed in 91 patients. In 40 of the patients who underwent a Hartmann procedure, we performed a second operation for colostomy closure (HC&CC group).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the groups with regard to age, sex, morbidity, reoperation because of complications, mortality rates, and duration of intensive care unit stay (P > .05). The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in the HC&CC group than in the other groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In cases without the complications of perforation or gangrene, sigmoid resection with immediate anastomosis was feasible. Single-stage operations did not increase morbidity or mortality rates, and patients required a shorter hospital stay than those who had undergone 2-stage operations.

The management of rectal cancer in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

The majority of patients with rectal cancer are elderly. Due to the increasingly aging population the number of people with colorectal cancer is increasing. As medical advances in the areas of local therapy, radiation therapy, and surgical technique, such as, laparoscopy are made more elderly patients are offered various types of treatment for rectal cancer. As the number of treatment options increase, the debate on how to treat elderly patients' with rectal cancer intensifies.

METHODS

A Medline search using "rectal cancer," "elderly," "local therapy," "radical surgery," and "radiation therapy" as key words was performed for English-language articles. Further references were obtained through cross-referencing the bibliography cited in each work.

DISCUSSION

Numerous treatment options exists for elderly patients with rectal cancer. These range from transanal local excision to radical surgery. The best treatment option for a certain elderly patient is multifactorial and includes tumor stage, operative curability, preoperative functioning of the patient, patient comorbidities, quality of life goals, and patient preference.

CONCLUSION

Age, taken as an independent variable, is not a contraindication to any specific type of therapy, including radical surgery with primary anastomsis. Patients' who meet the criteria for local resection should undergo this procedure. However, for tumors which are not amenable to local resection, these patients should be considered for radical surgery if this provides the best chance for cure. Elderly patients who can tolerate a major operation, and have good preoperative sphincter function should undergo a resection with primary anastomosis.

[Treatment of cancer and hematological malignancy in elderly people: oncogeriatrics as a discipline for the future (Part I): geriatric evaluation and management of solid tumors]

PURPOSE

Fifty percent of cancer arise in people older than 65 year-old. Most clinical trials in cancer treatment are limited in patients younger than 65 year-old. We review literature describing particularity of cancer treatment in elderly patients.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Therapeutic decisions should be based on an estimation of the patient's life expectancy, and risks and benefits should be weighted up accordingly. Geriatric oncology is made of a geriatric evaluation of patient and of knowledge of clinical trial about elderly patients.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

We present in this issue the principle of geriatric evaluation and the results of recent clinical trial on elderly cancer patients.

Do bowel cancer patients participate in treatment decision-making? Findings from a qualitative study

The views of bowel cancer patients towards treatment decision-making and the extent to which they participate in this process were investigated. A prospective longitudinal qualitative study was conducted based on 55 new consultations between oncologists and bowel cancer patients and interviews with 37 recently diagnosed patients, 28 of whom were re-interviewed after 6 months. The interview and consultation data were transcribed verbatim and coded. Theoretical comparisons were made between the interviews and themes emerging from the consultation narratives. The analysis revealed that most bowel cancer patients preferred a limited role in the treatment decision-making process, preferring to delegate the responsibility to the clinician. However, they did not always consider themselves as 'passive' participants within the consultation and many felt that they had made the final decision to accept or refuse treatment. The consultation data shows that when a treatment recommendation was not forthcoming from the oncologist, patients became more proactive in the consultation, often taking the initiative to participate. It is concluded that patients who indicate a desire to participate in these types of consultations should be encouraged to do so and oncologists should try to identify those patients who could benefit from a greater role in treatment decision-making.

Emergency resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Emergency colorectal surgery in the elderly has been associated with a high mortality rate. Although the current trend for the management of obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma favours primary resection and anastomosis, the safety and benefits of this approach in the elderly have not been studied.

METHODS

Some 57 elderly (aged more than 70 years) and 59 younger patients underwent emergency resection of an acutely obstructing left-sided colorectal carcinoma. Postoperative results in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The primary resection rate was 95 per cent in the elderly and 89 per cent in younger patients (P = 0.70), with a primary anastomosis rate of 84 per cent and 78 per cent respectively (P = 0.64). Elderly patients had a significantly higher incidence of premorbid risk factors and postoperative cardiorespiratory complications but no increase in surgical complications. Anastomotic leaks occurred in 6 per cent of the elderly and 4 per cent of younger patients (P = 0.65), and the hospital mortality rate was 9 and 5 per cent respectively (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

Emergency resection and primary anastomosis for left-sided obstructing colorectal carcinoma can be performed with favourable outcome in the elderly and should be the treatment of choice in most elderly patients.

Effects of aging on the functional outcome of coloanal anastomosis with colonic J-pouch

BACKGROUND

Many low rectal cancers can be treated radically by proctectomy with total mesorectal excision followed by colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis (CPAA). In elderly patients, the fear of poor function might reduce indications for CPAA in favor of abdomino-perineal excision with end stoma.

METHODS

Among 198 patients with CPAA operated on for low rectal cancer between 1984 and 1992, 20 patients over 75 years old were alive without recurrence at the time of telephone interview (July 1995). Minimal follow-up was 3 years (mean 8) for all patients. Their functional results were compared with those of 37 younger patients operated consecutively during the last 5 years of the study period.

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched for gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, histologic staging, and use of adjuvant radiotherapy. Follow-up was longer in the elderly group than in the young group (96 versus 63 months, respectively). The elderly group had a median of 1 bowel movement per day and the young group a median of 1.5 (P = 0.13). The presence of irregular intestinal transit was reported in 48% of the aged and in 35% of the young group (P = 0.6), but fragmented defecation was less frequent (25% versus 47%, respectively; P = 0.15). Urgency was noted, respectively, in 15% and 22% of elderly and young patients (P = 0.7) and constipation in 40% and 22% (P = 0.2). Incontinence for feces (15%) and for flatus (40%) in elderly were not significantly different from the younger group (14% and 46%, P = 1.0 and P = 0.8, respectively). Laxatives were used in 32% of elderly and 17% of young patients (P = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcome may be good to excellent in elderly patients after CPAA and compares well with that obtained in younger patients. Constipation, however, may be more frequent in the elderly. Age is not a contraindication for CPAA if the sphincter tone is clinically normal.

Economics of pancreatoduodenectomy in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Managed care and the increasing percentage of surgical procedures performed in the elderly have renewed the focus on hospital charges and expenditures. The objective of this study was to determine whether septuagenarians and octogenarians accrue more hospital charges or have a higher risk of morbidity and death.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charges and pertinent clinical outcomes data that were available on 70 of the last 100 pancreatoduodenectomies performed at our institution (1989 to 1994). Charges from four cost centers were analyzed and normalized to 1995 dollars by using the Consumer Price Index and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, 70 years of age or older (n = 21); group 2, younger than 70 years of age (n = 49).

RESULTS

Anesthetic charges were $2657 +/- $835 for group 1 versus $2815 +/- $826 for group 2, which was not a statistically significant difference. Laboratory charges were $4650 +/- $3284 for group 1 versus $5969 +/- $5169 for group 2, which was not a significant difference. Pharmaceutical charges were $5424 +/- $4435 for group 1 versus $9243 +/- $9695 for group 2, which was not a significant difference. Charges for operative units were $6198 +/- $1671 for group 1 versus $7469 +/- $2116 for group 2, p < 0.02. Total charges were $41,180 +/- $20,635 for group 1 versus $50,968 +/- $33,783 for group 2, which was not a significant difference. No difference was noted in morbidity, mortality, length of stay, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatoduodenectomy in the elderly can be performed safely without accruing higher cost, increased morbidity, or increased mortality.