Anticholinergic drugs for wheeze in children under the age of two years

Pharmacotherapy in bronchiolitis at discharge from emergency departments within the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines advise against pharmacotherapy in bronchiolitis. However, little is known about global variation in prescribing practices for bronchiolitis at discharge from emergency departments. We aimed to evaluate global variation in prescribing practice (ie, inhaled salbutamol, or oral or inhaled corticosteroids) for infants with bronchiolitis at discharge from emergency departments.

METHODS

We did a planned secondary analysis of a multinational, retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks. Previously healthy infants (aged <12 months) who were discharged with bronchiolitis between Jan 1 and Dec 31, 2013 from 38 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand, Canada, Spain and Portugal, the UK and Ireland, and the USA were included. The primary outcome was pharmacotherapy prescription at discharge from the emergency department. Secondary outcomes were revisits to the emergency department or hospitalisations for bronchiolitis within 21 days of discharge.

FINDINGS

Of 1566 infants discharged from the emergency department, 317 (20%) were prescribed pharmacotherapy. Corticosteroid prescriptions were infrequent, ranging from 0% (0 of 68 infants) in Spain and Portugal to 6% (25 of 452) in the USA. Salbutamol prescriptions ranged from 5% (22 of 432) in the UK and Ireland to 32% (146 of 452) in the USA. Compared with the UK and Ireland, the odds of prescription of pharmacotherapy were increased in Spain and Portugal (odds ratio [OR] 9·22, 95% CI 1·70-49·96), the USA (8·20, 2·79-24·11), Canada (5·17, 1·61-16·67), and Australia and New Zealand (1·21, 0·36-4·10). After adjustment for clustering by site, pharmacotherapy at discharge was associated with older age (per 1 month increase; OR 1·23, 95% CI 1·16-1·30), oxygen saturation (per 1% decrease from 100%; 1·09, 1·01-1·18), chest retractions (1·88, 1·26-2·79), network (p=0·00050), and site (p<0·00090). 303 (19%) of 1566 infants returned to the emergency department and 129 (43%) of 303 were hospitalised. Discharge pharmacotherapy was not associated with revisits (p=0·55) or subsequent hospitalisations (p=0·50).

INTERPRETATION

Use of ineffective medications in infants with bronchiolitis at discharge from emergency departments is common, with large differences in prescribing practices between countries and emergency departments. Enhanced knowledge translation and deprescribing efforts are needed to optimise and unify the management of bronchiolitis.

FUNDING

None.

Diagnosis, management, and prognosis of preschool wheeze

Preschool children (ie, those aged 5 years or younger) with wheeze consume a disproportionately high amount of health-care resources compared with older children and adults with wheeze or asthma, representing a diagnostic challenge. Although several phenotype classifications have been described, none have been validated to identify individuals responding to specific therapeutic approaches. Several risk factors related to genetic, prenatal, and postnatal environment are associated with preschool wheezing. Findings from several cohort studies have shown that preschool children with wheeze have deficits in lung function at 6 years of age that persisted until early and middle adulthood, suggesting increased susceptibility in the first years of life that might lead to persistent sequelae. Daily inhaled corticosteroids seem to be the most effective therapy for recurrent wheezing in trials of children with interim symptoms or atopy; intermittent high-dose inhaled corticosteroids are effective in moderate-to-severe viral-induced wheezing without interim symptoms. The role of leukotriene receptor antagonist is less clear. Interventions to modify the short-term and long-term outcomes of preschool wheeze should be a research priority.

Controversies in the management of preschool viral wheeze

The clinical diagnosis of asthma represents several putative wheeze phenotypes, each associated with a unique cluster of risk factors, underlying inflammation, and response to therapy. In school-age children, the 'classical' atopic asthma phenotype predominates. By contrast, asthma in children aged between 1 and 5 years is frequently characterised by transient episodes of wheeze trigged by viral colds, with few or no interval symptoms (preschool viral wheeze). This phenotype has a different cluster of risk factors from atopic asthma and thus might not respond to asthma therapies of proven efficacy in older children. The objective of this review is to look at the current evidence in the management of 'preschool viral wheeze'.

The yellow zone in asthma treatment: is it a gray zone?

OBJECTIVE

To review the available literature on methods of preventing and minimizing exacerbations and to target problems for improvement.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Cochrane Review searches of the English-language literature using the following key yellow zone terms: asthma exacerbation, self-management plans, inhaled corticosteroids, and acute management of asthma exacerbations.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles relevant to our yellow zone intervention inquiry.

RESULTS

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines advocate that physicians give patients written action plans with instructions on managing home (yellow zone) exacerbations. However, the criteria used to identify the yellow zone are ambiguous and often confusing to patients and physicians. In addition, apart from a passing mention that doubling doses of inhaled corticosteroids may be an option in asthma step-up care, the guidelines contain no recommendations for yellow zone treatment strategies. This deficiency is directly related to the paucity of organized evidence on the efficacy of the various pharmacological interventions that can be used during an exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

Translating the NIH guidelines into realistic clinical practice requires a clearer and more patient-friendly definition of the yellow zone, and this improved definition will facilitate the prescription of effective interventions in the management of yellow zone exacerbations.

Update on Cochrane data on paediatric respiratory diseases

INTRODUCTION

Systematic reviews seek to describe and summarise the best evidence for a given intervention by pooling data from relevant quality clinical trials. The Cochrane Collaboration has fostered the development and dissemination of systematic reviews throughout the world. We have identified and summarised The Cochrane systematic reviews of relevance to the paediatric pulmonologist.

METHODS

We performed an expert search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using a combination of medical subject headings and free text terms relating to paediatric respiratory disease.

RESULTS

The search identified 120 systematic reviews with interventions specific to children with some relevance to pulmonary disease, and 327 reviews with interventions relating to pulmonary disease in adults and children. After pragmatic exclusions, 81 reviews were sorted by disease and 59 of these are discussed in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

There are now many systematic reviews that make a positive contribution to paediatric pulmonology. The majority of reviews (69%) found evidence that either confirmed or refuted an accepted practice. The remaining reviews concluded that the evidence for an accepted practice is poor and sometimes wholly absent. Clinicians must be aware that lack of evidence of effect is not the same as evidence of lack of effect. Caution must be exercised before applying the conclusions of systematic reviews based upon adult data to childhood disease.

Anticholinergic therapy for chronic asthma in children over two years of age

BACKGROUND

In the intrinsic system of controlling airway calibre, the cholinergic (muscarinic) sympathetic nervous system has an important role. Anticholinergic, anti muscarinic bronchodilators such as ipratropium bromide are frequently used in the management of childhood airway disease. In asthma, ipratropium is a less potent bronchodilator than beta-2 adrenergic agents but it is known to be a useful adjunct to other therapies, particularly in status asthmaticus. What remains unclear is the role of anticholinergic drugs in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of anticholinergic drugs in chronic asthma in children over the age of 2 years.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles were searched in January 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which anticholinergic drugs were given for chronic asthma in children over 2 years of age were included. Studies including comparison of: anticholinergics with placebo, and anticholinergics with any other drug were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eligibility for inclusion and quality of trials were assessed independently by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.Three papers compared the effects of anticholinergic drugs with placebo, and a meta-analysis of these results demonstrated no statistically significant benefit of the use of anticholinergic drugs over placebo in any of the outcome measures used. The results of one of these trials could not be included in the meta-analysis but the authors did report significantly lower symptom scores with inhaled anticholinergics compared with placebo. However, there was no significant difference between ipratropium bromide and placebo in the percentage of symptom-free nights or days. Two trials studied the effects of anticholinergics on bronchial hyper responsiveness to histamine, by measuring the provocation dose of histamine needed to cause a fall of 20 % in FEV1 (PD 20). One study (comparing anticholinergics with placebo) reported a statistically significant increase in PD 20 but this was not found in another study (comparing anticholinergics with a beta-2 agonist). Both trials also examined the effect of anticholinergic drugs on diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and reported no significant effect. Two studies compared the addition of an anticholinergic drug to a beta-2 agonist with the beta-2 agonist alone. Both trials failed to show any significant benefit from the long term use of combined anticholinergics with beta-2 agonists compared with beta-2 agonists alone. One trial compared the effects of oral and inhaled anticholinergic drugs with placebo. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the outcome measures except for a higher FEV1 / VC ratio and RV / TLC ratio with oral anticholinergic therapy when compared with placebo.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The present review summarises the best evidence available to date. Although there were some small beneficial findings in favour of anticholinergic therapy, there is insufficient data to support the use of anticholinergic drugs in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma in children.

Management of children with severe asthma exacerbation in the emergency department

Although acute asthma is a very common cause of emergency department visits in children, there is as yet insufficient evidence for the establishment of a standardized treatment protocol. The aim of this review is to describe updated information on the management of asthma exacerbations in the pediatric emergency department. Oxygen is the first-line treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in the emergency department to control hypoxemia. It is accompanied by the administration of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists followed by corticosteroids. beta(2)-Adrenoceptor agonists have traditionally been administered by nebulization, although spacers have recently been introduced and proven, in many cases, to be as effective as nebulization. Oral prednisolone, with its reliability, simplicity, convenience and low cost, should remain the treatment of choice for the most severe asthma exacerbations, when the lung airways are extremely contracted and filled with secretions. Recently, several studies have shown that high-dose inhaled corticosteroids are at least as effective as oral corticosteroids in controlling moderate to severe asthma attacks in children and therefore should be considered an alternative treatment to oral corticosteroids in moderate to severe asthma attacks. Studies of other drugs have shown that ipratropium bromide may be given only in addition to beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists; theophylline has no additional benefit, and magnesium sulfate has no clear advantage. Comprehensive asthma management should also include asthma education, measures to prevent asthma triggers, and training in the use of inhalers and spacers. Proper management will avoid most asthma attacks and reduce admission and readmission to emergency departments.