Subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin analogues for diabetic ketoacidosis

Subcutaneous Insulin Aspart Every 4 Hours in the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Case Series

This case series evaluates the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) insulin Aspart administered every 4 h for managing mild-to-moderate diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in COVID-19 patients, addressing a current evidence gap. We conducted a retrospective review of confirmed COVID-19 patients over 15 years old who developed mild to moderate DKA between July 2020 and October 2021. Insulin Aspart was administered at 0.4 units/kg SC every 4 h, reduced to 0.2 units/kg when blood glucose (BG) decreased to <250 mg/dL, and SC basal insulin was initiated at 0.15-0.2 units/kg at DKA diagnosis. A total of seven patients, with a mean age of 67.4 ± 13.2 years, predominantly female (71.4 %), and all with pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus, were analyzed. Initial biochemical parameters included BG of 449 ± 157.3 mg/dL, HbA1c of 10.6 ± 2.8 %, pH of 7.34 (range, 7.26-7.45), beta-hydroxybutyrate of 4.0 ± 1.5 mmol/L, and bicarbonate of 15.5 ± 2.2 mmol/L. The time to resolution of hyperglycemia (BG < 250 mg/dL) and DKA was 8.0 ± 3.1 and was 12.7 ± 5.8 h, respectively. During DKA resolution, one patient experienced hypoglycemia (47 mg/dL) and later developed recurrent DKA as COVID-19 infection worsened. Three deaths occurred due to COVID-19-related complications following DKA recovery. While SC insulin Aspart administered every 4 h shows promise, careful monitoring for recurrent DKA and septic shock is essential for optimal management.

Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues ± long-acting insulin vs IV insulin infusion in DKA: updated meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is often treated with intravenous regular insulin infusion (IVRII). Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues (FAIAs); either alone or combined with subcutaneous long-acting insulin (LAI); might be useful to treat DKA. Our meta-analysis updated on their benefits and safety in DKA.

METHODS

We searched major electronic databases for randomised trials on subcutaneous FAIAs ± subcutaneous LAI vs IVRII in DKA. Primary outcomes were all-cause in-hospital mortality, time to resolution of DKA and hyperglycemia, in-hospital DKA recurrence and hospital readmission for DKA post-discharge. Secondary outcomes included resource utilisation and patient satisfaction. Safety outcomes were adverse events. Reviewers assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence using GRADE. We performed a priori subgroup and trial sequential analyses on primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven trials enrolled 351 mainly adult patients (255/351) with mild to moderate DKA. No trials studied subcutaneous FAIA and subcutaneous LAI. Their risk of bias was high or unclear in several domains. No all-cause in-hospital mortality and DKA recurrence were reported. No trial investigated hospital readmission for DKA post-discharge. There was no difference in mean time to resolution of DKA (mean difference = -0.70, 95% CI -2.18 to 0.79 h, p = 0.36) or hyperglycemia [blood glucose < 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L)] (mean difference = -0.17, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.76 h, p = 0.72) between subcutaneous FAIA and IVRII groups. There were largely no subgroup effects. Both groups had similar secondary outcomes. Hypoglycemia was the most common adverse event. Quality of evidence was low to very-low for all outcomes. The only possible trial sequential analysis for time to resolution of DKA was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

There was low- to very-low quality evidence that subcutaneous FAIA did not affect patient-centered outcomes in mainly adult patients with mild to moderate DKA compared to IVRII.

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intravenous vs Subcutaneous Insulin for Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Objectives

We previously implemented the subcutaneous (SQ) insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (SQuID) protocol, demonstrating safe, effective treatment of low to moderate (LTM) severity DKA in a non-intensive care unit setting. SQuID replaces intravenous (IV) insulin with SQ injections and reduces glucose checks from hourly to every 2 hours. We are not aware of any data on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA. Our objective was to compare satisfaction in patients treated with IV insulin to that in patients treated with the SQ protocol.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban academic hospital (March 2023 to March 2024) of emergency department patients treated for LTM DKA with SQ or IV insulin. Patients were contacted by phone in the hospital after the resolution of DKA. We used the validated 21-item Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Inpatient tool (DTSQ-IP) using 7-tier Likert-style options (0 = negative; 6 = positive) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment. We computed the DTSQ-IP composite treatment satisfaction score (using 15 of the 21 items), assessing differences between groups.

Results

Of the 60 patients contacted, 52 (87%) completed the questionnaire. Median DTSQ-IP satisfaction scores for SQuID and IV insulin patients were 86.0 (IQR, 79.0, 88.0) and 81.0 (IQR, 77.0, 88.0), respectively. We found no difference in satisfaction between groups (difference 5.0; 95% CI, -3.0, 10.0).

Conclusion

In this single-center study, patient satisfaction with DKA care was high, with no differences observed between patients treated with SQ vs IV insulin protocols. This is the first study we are aware of on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA or treatment with SQ insulin. Though the sample size is small, these findings suggest that patient satisfaction should not represent a barrier to the implementation of SQ protocols for LTM severity DKA.

Challenging management dogma where evidence is non-existent, weak, or outdated: part II

Many dogmas influence daily clinical practice, and critical care medicine is no exception. We previously highlighted the weak, questionable, and often contrary evidence base underpinning four established medical managements-loop diuretics for acute heart failure, routine use of heparin thromboprophylaxis, rate of sodium correction for hyponatremia, and 'every hour counts' for treating bacterial meningitis. We now provide four further examples in this "Dogma II" piece (a week's course of antibiotics, diabetic ketoacidosis algorithms, sodium bicarbonate to improve ventricular contractility during severe metabolic acidosis, and phosphate replacement for hypophosphatemia) where routine practice warrants re-appraisal.

Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report

The American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS), American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) and Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) convened a panel of internists and diabetologists to update the ADA consensus statement on hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes, published in 2001 and last updated in 2009. The objective of this consensus report is to provide up-to-date knowledge about the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) in adults. A systematic examination of publications since 2009 informed new recommendations. The target audience is the full spectrum of diabetes healthcare professionals and individuals with diabetes.

The Effects of Subcutaneous Rapid-Acting Insulin Aspart in the Treatment of Mild and Moderate Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Children: A Prospective Study

Background and objectives The traditional treatment approach to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) involves the replacement of fluid and electrolyte deficits and a continuous intravenous infusion of regular insulin. Several clinical trials supported the administration of subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin analogs in the management of uncomplicated DKA. This study aimed to determine the effects/safety of subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin aspart injections in treating uncomplicated mild and moderate DKA in children. Methods In this prospective study in 2022, 25 children with mild/or moderate DKA were enrolled. The main outcome measure was median time (hours) for the resolution of ketoacidosis. Data recorded were as follows: clinical characteristics, severity of ketoacidosis and dehydration, blood glucose, sodium, potassium, creatinine, urine ketones, hospitalization's duration, and complications. Based on the degree of dehydration, fluid deficit was replaced by sodium chloride 0.45%. Insulin aspart 0.15 units/kg subcutaneous injections were given every 2 hours in the hospital outside ICU. Blood glucose was measured hourly and blood gases every 2 hours. Ketoacidosis was considered resolved when the patient did not have nausea/vomiting, was conscious, and could eat, and blood glucose was <250 mg/dL, pH was >7.30, and/or HCO3 was >15 mmol/L. Results Of 25 DKA patients (mean age 11.06±3.89, range 4-17 years, 60% girls), 16 cases (64%) had established type 1 diabetes. Overall, 13 (52%) cases had mild ketoacidosis (average pH=7.25), and 12 (48%) cases had moderate ketoacidosis (average pH=7.15). The mean time to resolution of ketoacidosis was 11.24 hours. All but one patient met DKA recovery criteria without complications. Mild cases compared to moderate cases of DKA had a shorter duration to resolution of DKA (p = 0.04). Mean duration of hospitalization was 2.3 days. No electrolyte disturbances, hypoglycemia events, readmission or mortality, or other adverse effects were observed. Conclusion In children with mild and moderate DKA, subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin aspart administration was an effective, safe, and convenient treatment.

Outcomes of children with severe diabetic ketoacidosis managed outside of a pediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication of type 1 diabetes. Our objective was to determine if children with severe DKA without alteration in mental status can be managed safely on a general children's medical unit.

METHODS

Single center retrospective study of 191 patient encounters among 168 children admitted to the children's medical unit (CMU) at Primary Children's Hospital between 2007 and 2017 with severe DKA (pH <7.1 and/or bicarbonate <5 mmol/L). Chart review identified complications including death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), incidence of cerebral edema, and hypoglycemia. We compared patients requiring ICU transfer with those who did not with respect to demographics, laboratory findings at presentation, therapeutic interventions, length of stay, and cost.

RESULTS

Of 191 patient encounters, there were 0 deaths (0%, 95% CI 0-2.4%), 22 episodes of alteration of mental status concerning for developing cerebral edema (11.5%, 95% CI 7.7-16.9%), 19 ICU transfers (10%, 95% CI 6.4-15.1%), and 7 episodes of hypoglycemia (3.7%, 95% CI 1.6-7.5%). ICU transfer was associated lower initial pH (7.03 ± 0.06 vs. 7.07 ± 0.07, p<0.05), increased length of stay (3.0 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 days, p<0.05), and increased cost of hospitalization (mean ± SD $8,073 ± 2,042 vs. $5,217 ± 1,697, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of children with severe DKA without alteration in mental status can be managed safely on a medical unit. Implementing a pH cutoff may identify high-risk patients that require ICU level of care.

Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues, alone or in combination with long-acting insulin, versus intravenous regular insulin infusion in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is traditionally managed using intravenous regular insulin infusion (RII) in intensive care unit (ICU)/high dependency unit (HDU). Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues (FAIAs) may help to manage DKA outside ICU/HDU. Furthermore, combining subcutaneous long-acting insulin (LAI) with subcutaneous FAIAs may accelerate ketoacidosis resolution. The latest (2016) Cochrane review was inconclusive regarding subcutaneous FAIAs versus intravenous RII in DKA. It was limited by small sample sizes, unclear risk of bias (RoB) in primary trials and did not examine subcutaneous FAIAs with subcutaneous LAI versus intravenous RII in DKA. We report the protocol for an updated meta-analysis on the safety and benefits of subcutaneous FAIAs with/without subcutaneous LAI versus intravenous RII in DKA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, from inception until December 2022, without language restrictions, for randomised trials on subcutaneous FAIAs with/without subcutaneous LAI versus intravenous RII in DKA. We also search ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu and reference lists of included trials. Primary outcomes include all-cause in-hospital mortality, time to DKA resolution, in-hospital DKA recurrence and hospital readmission for DKA post-discharge. Secondary outcomes include resource utilisation and patient satisfaction. Safety outcomes include important complications of DKA and insulin. Reviewers will extract data, assess overall RoB and quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. We will assess statistical heterogeneity by visually inspecting forest plots and the I² statistic. We will synthesise data using the random-effects model. Predefined subgroup analyses are: mild versus moderate versus severe DKA; age <20 vs ≥20 years; pregnant versus non-pregnant; infective versus non-infective DKA precipitating cause; subcutaneous FAIAs alone versus subcutaneous FAIAs and subcutaneous LAI; and high versus low overall RoB. We will also perform trial sequential analysis for primary outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics board approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022369518.

The Pathophysiology and Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in COVID-19 Patients: A Literature Review

Diabetic individuals are considered a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and several studies noted worse outcomes, including death, among those who get infected. Diabetic emergencies, such as ketoacidosis (DKA), are common and potentially life-threatening conditions in uncontrolled patients. While the pathophysiological background of the relationship between COVID-19 and DKA is not fully understood, early reports available so far indicate that patients with pre-existing diabetes who get infected with the SARS-CoV 2 virus are at higher risk of DKA. It was also suggested that DKA is a poor prognostic sign for infected patients, these being at higher risk of developing worse forms of COVID-19 disease and having high mortality. Therefore, healthcare personnel dealing with such patients face a considerable challenge, as the correct and safe emergency management of such cases is far from established. This article aimed to conduct a study that reviews the current published data available about patients with DKA and COVID-19.

Glargine versus regular insulin protocol in feline diabetic ketoacidosis

Objectives

To determine whether basal‐bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol.

Design

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

Setting

University teaching hospital.

Animals

Twenty cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

Interventions

The cats were block‐randomized to either a CRI protocol using regular insulin (CRI‐group; n = 10) or a basal‐bolus SC and IM glargine protocol (glargine‐group, n = 10). Baseline blood gases, electrolytes, glucose, and β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐OHB) concentrations were measured at the time of admission and later at predefined intervals until reaching the primary endpoint of the study, defined as a β‐hydroxybutyrate concentration < 2.55 mmol/L.

Measurements and main results

The main outcome measure was time (h) to resolution of ketonemia. Secondary outcome measures were time until first improvement of hyperglycemia and ketonemia, decrease of glucose to ≤13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL), resolution of acidosis, consumption of first meal, and discharge from hospital. Additionally, occurrence of treatment‐associated adverse events and death were compared. Seventeen cats (85%) survived to discharge, with no difference in survival between groups (P = 1.0). Median times to β‐OHB < 2.55 mmol/L were 42 (CRI‐group) and 30 (glargine‐group) hours, respectively (P = 0.114). Median times to first improvement of hyperglycemia (glargine‐group: 2 h; CRI‐group: 6 h; P = 0.018) and until discharge from hospital (glargine‐group: 140 h; CRI‐group: 174 h; P = 0.033) were significantly shorter in the glargine‐group. No significant differences were observed in any other parameter under investigation (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Basal‐bolus administration of glargine insulin appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the current standard CRI‐protocol for the management of DKA in cats. The positive outcomes and simplicity make it a viable option for the treatment of feline DKA.

Evaluation of Early Administration of Insulin Glargine in the Acute Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the early use of insulin glargine in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) patients. Early insulin glargine use in DKA was safe and associated with a trend towards faster DKA resolution.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early insulin glargine administration for acute management of DKA in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients, who were >18 years of age with DKA, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 12 h, and received intravenous insulin infusion for at least 6 h. The primary endpoint was the association between the time to insulin glargine administration and time to DKA resolution. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 913 patients evaluated, 380 were included in the study. The overall mean age was 45±17 years, 196 (51.6%) were female, and 262 (70%) patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus. The mean blood glucose level was 584.9±210 mg/dL, pH was 7.16±0.17, anion gap was 28.17±6.9 mEq/L, and serum bicarbonate level was 11.19±5.72 mEq/L. Every 6-h delay in insulin glargine administration was associated with a 26-min increase in time to DKA resolution (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.76-37.44; p<0.0001), 3.2-h increase in insulin infusion duration (95% CI, 28.8-36; p<0.0001), and 6.5-h increase in ICU LOS (95% CI, 5.04-7.92; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Early administration of insulin glargine is potentially safe and may be associated with a reduction in time to DKA resolution and a shorter duration of insulin infusion.

Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study

Background

Performing systematic reviews is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process.

Objective

We investigated whether a machine learning system could perform systematic reviews more efficiently.

Methods

All systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventional randomized controlled trials cited in recent clinical guidelines from the American Diabetes Association, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association (2 guidelines), and American Stroke Association were assessed. After reproducing the primary screening data set according to the published search strategy of each, we extracted correct articles (those actually reviewed) and incorrect articles (those not reviewed) from the data set. These 2 sets of articles were used to train a neural network–based artificial intelligence engine (Concept Encoder, Fronteo Inc). The primary endpoint was work saved over sampling at 95% recall (WSS@95%).

Results

Among 145 candidate reviews of randomized controlled trials, 8 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. For these 8 reviews, the machine learning system significantly reduced the literature screening workload by at least 6-fold versus that of manual screening based on WSS@95%. When machine learning was initiated using 2 correct articles that were randomly selected by a researcher, a 10-fold reduction in workload was achieved versus that of manual screening based on the WSS@95% value, with high sensitivity for eligible studies. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased dramatically every time the algorithm learned a correct article.

Conclusions

Concept Encoder achieved a 10-fold reduction of the screening workload for systematic review after learning from 2 randomly selected studies on the target topic. However, few meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials were included. Concept Encoder could facilitate the acquisition of evidence for clinical guidelines.

Clinical profile and outcomes in COVID-19 patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To conduct a systematic literature review and analyze the demographic/biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and combined DKA/HHS (hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome).

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched till August 3, 2020 to identify studies reporting COVID-19 patients with DKA and combined DKA/HHS. A total of 19 articles reporting 110 patients met the eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients, 91 (83%) patients had isolated DKA while 19 (17%) had DKA/HHS. The majority of the patients were male (63%) and belonged to black ethnicity (36%). The median age at presentation ranged from 45.5 to 59.0 years. Most of the patients (77%) had pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Only 10% of the patients had newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. The median blood glucose at presentation ranged from 486.0 to 568.5 mg/dl, being higher in patients with DKA/HHS compared to isolated DKA. The volume of fluid replaced in the first 24 h was higher in patients with DKA/HHS in contrast to patients with DKA alone. The in-hospital mortality rate was 45%, with higher mortality in the DKA/HHS group than in the isolated DKA group (67% vs. 29%). pH was lower in patients who had died compared to those who were discharged.

CONCLUSION

DKA in COVID-19 patients portends a poor prognosis with a mortality rate approaching 50%. Differentiating isolated DKA from combined DKA/HHS is essential as the latter represents nearly one-fifth of the DKA cases and tends to have higher mortality than DKA alone.

Is subcutaneous insulin administration adequate for the management of hyperglycemic crisis in COVID-19?

There is a desperate need to explore different insulin administration strategies, particularly in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with hyperglycemic crisis. Noteworthily, diabetes mellitus (DM) and poorly controlled blood glucose increase the risk of mortality and severity of COVID-19. Intravenous (IV) insulin administration with hourly monitoring of blood glucose is the ideal approach in managing patients with hyperglycemic crisis, but it is not judicious to be applied in developing countries where shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a major issue. Furthermore, increasing the probability of "already greater risks" for doctors or other healthcare workers contracting COVID-19 seems inappropriate. Thus, an alternative administration strategy and more moderate glucose monitoring to reduce the contact exposure of healthcare workers with COVID-19 patients, by ensuring appropriate blood glucose levels, needs to be performed in this critical pandemic era. Subcutaneous (SC) rapid-acting insulin analog administration could presumably be a solution to this contentious issue.

Diabetic Ketoacidosis in COVID-19: Unique Concerns and Considerations

CONTEXT

While individuals with diabetes appear to be at similar risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection to those without diabetes, they are more likely to suffer severe consequences, including death. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common and potentially lethal acute complication of diabetes arising from a relative insulin deficiency, which occurs more often in those with type 1 diabetes and in the setting of moderate to severe illness. Early reports indicate that among patients with pre-existing diabetes, DKA may be a common complication of severe COVID-19 and a poor prognostic sign.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This clinical perspective explores the key elements of caring for individuals with DKA during the COVID-19 pandemic through 2 cases. Topics addressed include diagnosis, triage, and the fundamental principles of treatment with a focus on the importance of characterizing DKA severity and medical complexity to determine the best approach.

CONCLUSIONS

As discussed, some tenets of DKA management may require flexibility in the setting of COVID-19 due to important public health goals, such as preventing transmission to highest risk individuals, reducing healthcare worker exposure to infected patients, and preserving personal protective equipment. Evidence for alternative treatment strategies is explored, with special attention placed on treatment options that may be more relevant during the pandemic, including use of subcutaneous insulin therapy. Finally, DKA is often a preventable condition. We include evidence-based strategies and guidance designed to empower clinicians and patients to avoid this serious complication when possible.

An Approach to Diabetic Ketoacidosis in an Emergency Setting

BACKGROUND

Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) is one of the most commonly encountered diabetic complication emergencies. It typically affects people with type 1 diabetes at the onset of the disease. It can also affect people with type 2 diabetes, although this is uncommon.

METHODS

Research and online content related to diabetes online activity is reviewed. DKA is caused by a relative or absolute deficiency of insulin and elevated levels of counter-regulatory hormones.

RESULTS

Goals of therapy are to correct dehydration, acidosis, and to reverse ketosis, gradually restoring blood glucose concentration to near normal.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to monitor potential complications of DKA and, if necessary, to treat them and any precipitating events.

Diagnosis and management of metabolic acidosis: guidelines from a French expert panel

Metabolic acidosis is a disorder frequently encountered in emergency medicine and intensive care medicine. As literature has been enriched with new data concerning the management of metabolic acidosis, the French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française [SRLF]) and the French Emergency Medicine Society (Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence [SFMU]) have developed formalized recommendations from experts using the GRADE methodology. The fields of diagnostic strategy, patient assessment, and referral and therapeutic management were addressed and 29 recommendations were made: 4 recommendations were strong (Grade 1), 10 were weak (Grade 2), and 15 were experts’ opinions. A strong agreement from voting participants was obtained for all recommendations. The application of Henderson–Hasselbalch and Stewart methods for the diagnosis of the metabolic acidosis mechanism is discussed and a diagnostic algorithm is proposed. The use of ketosis and venous and capillary lactatemia is also treated. The value of pH, lactatemia, and its kinetics for the referral of patients in pre-hospital and emergency departments is considered. Finally, the modalities of insulin therapy during diabetic ketoacidosis, the indications for sodium bicarbonate infusion and extra-renal purification as well as the modalities of mechanical ventilation during severe metabolic acidosis are addressed in therapeutic management.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of care in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: A retrospective study from a tertiary diabetes center in Thailand

Background

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a metabolic catastrophe which could occur in any type of diabetes. Even when fundamental key points of DKA treatment had been followed, some differences exist in treatment protocols in each physician, highlighting the need to assess adherence to DKA guideline.

Aim

This study aimed to examine trend of hospitalized DKA patients and outcomes of treatment over a decade at Theptarin Hospital, a multi-discipline based diabetes center in Thailand.

Method

A retrospective study of DKA episodes admitted over a 14-year period (2005–2018) was done. Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, type of diabetes, severity of DKA were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 94 DKA episodes occurred in 81 diabetic patients (females 61.5%, mean age 47.4 ± 20.4 years, T1DM 41.5%, T2DM 50.0%, Ketosis-prone diabetes 8.5%, baseline A1C 10.8 ± 3.0%). While infection was the common precipitating factor in T2DM, omission of insulin was the usual precipitating factor in T1DM. During ongoing management, 26.6% of patients developed hypokalemia and supplementation was not prescribed as per protocol in this group of patients. Almost 13% of patients experienced hypoglycemia in the first 24 h. Median time to resolution of DKA was 8.5 h. Four T2DM patients expired from the precipitating cause of DKA which accounted for mortality rate at 4.3% in our study.

Conclusions

Inadequate metabolic monitoring and iatrogenic hypoglycemia remain areas of concern for DKA management. Occurrence of hypokalemia was related to poor adherence to protocol guidance on potassium supplementation. A strengthened educational program for nursing and medical staffs should be emphasized.

Early vs late oral nutrition in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis admitted to a medical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has an associated mortality of 1% to 5%. Upon admission, patients require insulin infusion and close monitoring of electrolyte and blood sugar levels with subsequent transitioning to subcutaneous insulin and oral nutrition. No recommendations exist regarding the appropriate timing for initiation of oral nutrition.

AIM

To assess short-term outcomes of oral nutrition initiated within 24 h of patients being admitted to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) for DKA.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a single academic medical center. The patient population consisted of adults admitted to the MICU with the diagnosis of DKA. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients receiving oral nutrition within (early nutrition group) and after (late nutrition group) the first 24 h of admission. The primary outcome was 28-d mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-d mortality, MICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS), and time to resolution of DKA.

RESULTS

There were 128 unique admissions to the MICU for DKA with 67 patients receiving early nutrition and 61 receiving late nutrition. The APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) IV mortality and LOS scores and DKA severity were similar between the groups. No difference in 28- or 90-d mortality was found. Early nutrition was associated with decreased hospital and MICU LOS but not with prolonged DKA resolution, anion gap closure, or greater rate of DKA complications.

CONCLUSION

In patients with DKA, early nutrition was associated with a shorter MICU and hospital LOS without increasing the rate of DKA complications.

Correlation of acidosis-adjusted potassium level and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic ketoacidosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

During the progress and resolution of a diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) episode, potassium levels are significantly affected by the extent of acidosis. However, none of the current guidelines take into account acidosis during resuscitation of potassium level in DKA management, which may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To assess literature regarding the adjustment of potassium level using pH to calculate pH-adjusted corrected potassium level, and to observe the relationship of cardiovascular outcomes with reported potassium level and pH-adjusted corrected potassium in DKA.

METHODOLOGY

Seven databases were searched from inception to January 2018 for studies which had reported people with diabetes developing diabetic ketoacidosis, in relation to prevalence or incidence, fluid resuscitation or potassium supplementation treatment, treatment or cardiovascular outcomes, and experimentation with DKA management or insulin. Quality of studies was evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias and Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in qualitative synthesis out of a total of 10,292 retrieved studies. Forty-one studies discussed the potassium level and blood pH at the time of admission, ten studies discussed cardiovascular outcomes, and only four studies concurrently discussed potassium level, pH, and cardiovascular outcomes. Only two studies were graded as good on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The reported potassium level was well within normal range (5.8 mmol/L), whereas pH rendered patients to be moderately acidotic (7.13). Surprisingly, none of the included studies mentioned pH-adjusted corrected potassium level and, hence, this was calculated later. Although mean corrected potassium was within the normal range (3.56 mmol/L), 13 studies had corrected potassium below 3.5 mmol/L and five had it below 3.0 mmol/L. Nevertheless, with the exception of one study, none discussed cardiovascular outcomes in the context of potassium or pH-adjusted potassium level.

CONCLUSION

The evidence surrounding cardiovascular outcomes during DKA episodes in light of a pH-adjusted corrected potassium level is scarce. A prospective observational, or preferably, an experimental study in this regard will ensure we can modify and enhance safety of existing DKA treatment protocols.

Comparison of subcutaneous insulin aspart and intravenous regular insulin for the treatment of mild and moderate diabetic ketoacidosis in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

To compare the safety/efficacy of intermittent subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin aspart with the standard low-dose intravenous infusion protocol of regular insulin for treatment of pediatric diabetic-ketoacidosis.

METHODS

For a prospective randomized-controlled clinical trial on 50 children/adolescents with mild/moderate diabetic-ketoacidosis, the diagnostic criteria for ketoacidosis included: blood glucose level >250 mg/dl, ketonuria>++, venous pH <7.3 and/or bicarbonate <15 mEq/l.

DATA COLLECTED

age, sex, clinical/laboratory parameters including blood sugar, arterial blood gases, urine ketones, severity of diabetic-ketoacidosis, amount of insulin administered to correct acidosis, time to recover from diabetic-ketoacidosis, number of days of hospitalization, and complications. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention (subcutaneous) and control (intravenous) groups. Controls received 0.05-0.1 unit/kg/hour intravenous regular insulin infusion until resolution of diabetic-ketoacidosis and stayed in the intensive care unit. Interventions received 0.15 unit/kg subcutaneous insulin aspart every two hours and stayed in regular medical ward.

RESULTS

From 50 children (age 2-17 years), 56% (28) were females, and 48% (24) had established-type I diabetes. Intervention and control groups had similar baseline clinical/laboratory findings. Average age (years) was 8.6 ± 0.8 for intervention and 8.86 ± 0.7 for control group (p = 0.4) with 64% having moderate diabetic-ketoacidosis. The mean total-dose of insulin units needed for treatment of diabetic-ketoacidosis in intervention (subcutaneous insulin aspart) was lower than controls (intravenous regular insulin) (p < 0.001). No mortality/serious events happened. Three diabetic-ketoacidosis recurrences among interventions and one among controls occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

To manage mild/moderate diabetic-ketoacidosis in children/adolescents, subcutaneous rapid-acting insulin aspart is an alternative to intravenous infusion of regular insulin. Subcutaneous insulin treated moderate DKA with faster recovery/shorter hospital stay.

Review of Evidence for Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management Protocols

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an endocrine emergency with associated risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, DKA management lacks strong evidence due to the absence of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

To review existing studies investigating inpatient DKA management in adults, focusing on intravenous (IV) fluids; insulin administration; potassium, bicarbonate, and phosphate replacement; and DKA management protocols and impact of DKA resolution rates on outcomes.

METHODS

Ovid Medline searches were conducted with limits "all adult" and published between "1973 to current" applied. National consensus statements were also reviewed. Eligibility was determined by two reviewers' assessment of title, abstract, and availability.

RESULTS

A total of 85 eligible articles published between 1973 and 2016 were reviewed. The salient findings were (i) Crystalloids are favoured over colloids though evidence is lacking. The preferred crystalloid and hydration rates remain contentious. (ii) IV infusion of regular human insulin is preferred over the subcutaneous route or rapid acting insulin analogues. Administering an initial IV insulin bolus before low-dose insulin infusions obviates the need for supplemental insulin. Consensus-statements recommend fixed weight-based over "sliding scale" insulin infusions although evidence is weak. (iii) Potassium replacement is imperative although no trials compare replacement rates. (iv) Bicarbonate replacement offers no benefit in DKA with pH > 6.9. In severe metabolic acidosis with pH < 6.9, there is lack of both data and consensus regarding bicarbonate administration. (v) There is no evidence that phosphate replacement offers outcome benefits. Guidelines consider replacement appropriate in patients with cardiac dysfunction, anaemia, respiratory depression, or phosphate levels <0.32 mmol/L. (vi) Upon resolution of DKA, subcutaneous insulin is recommended with IV insulin infusions ceased with an overlap of 1-2 h. (vii) DKA resolution rates are often used as end points in studies, despite a lack of evidence that rapid resolution improves outcome. (viii) Implementation of DKA protocols lacks strong evidence for adherence but may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There are major deficiencies in evidence for optimal management of DKA. Current practice is guided by weak evidence and consensus opinion. All aspects of DKA management require RCTs to affirm or redirect management and formulate consensus evidence-based practice to improve patient outcomes.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of long-acting inhaled agents for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of long-acting β-antagonists (LABA), long-acting antimuscarinic agents (LAMA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

SETTING

Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

PARTICIPANTS

208 randomised clinical trials (RCTs) including 134,692 adults with COPD.

INTERVENTIONS

LABA, LAMA and/or ICS, alone or in combination, versus each other or placebo.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

The proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe exacerbations. The number of patients experiencing mortality, pneumonia, serious arrhythmia and cardiovascular-related mortality (CVM) were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

NMA was conducted including 20 RCTs for moderate-to-severe exacerbations for 26,141 patients with an exacerbation in the past year. 32 treatments were effective versus placebo including: tiotropium, budesonide/formoterol, salmeterol, indacaterol, fluticasone/salmeterol, indacaterol/glycopyrronium, tiotropium/fluticasone/salmeterol and tiotropium/budesonide/formoterol. Tiotropium/budesonide/formoterol was most effective (99.2% probability of being the most effective according to the Surface Under the Cumulative RAnking (SUCRA) curve). NMA was conducted on mortality (88 RCTs, 97 526 patients); fluticasone/salmeterol was more effective in reducing mortality than placebo, formoterol and fluticasone alone, and was the most effective (SUCRA=71%). NMA was conducted on CVM (37 RCTs, 55,156 patients) and the following were safest: salmeterol versus each OF placebo, tiotropium and tiotropium (Soft Mist Inhaler (SMR)); fluticasone versus tiotropium (SMR); and salmeterol/fluticasone versus tiotropium and tiotropium (SMR). Triamcinolone acetonide was the most harmful (SUCRA=81%). NMA was conducted on pneumonia occurrence (54 RCTs, 61 551 patients). 24 treatments were more harmful, including 2 that increased risk of pneumonia versus placebo; fluticasone and fluticasone/salmeterol. The most harmful agent was fluticasone/salmeterol (SUCRA=89%). NMA was conducted for arrhythmia; no statistically significant differences between agents were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Many inhaled agents are available for COPD, some are safer and more effective than others. Our results can be used by patients and physicians to tailor administration of these agents.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO # CRD42013006725.