MEESSI-AHF score to estimate short-term prognosis of acute heart failure patients in the Emergency Department: a prospective and multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The assessment of acute heart failure (AHF) prognosis is primordial in emergency setting. Although AHF management is exhaustively codified using mortality predictors, there is currently no recommended scoring system for assessing prognosis. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends a comprehensive assessment of global AHF prognosis, considering in-hospital mortality, early rehospitalization rates and the length of hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of the Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with AHF (MEESSI-AHF) score in estimating short prognosis according to the ESC guidelines.

DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PATIENTS

A multicenter study was conducted between November 2020, and June 2021. Adult patients who presented to eleven French hospitals for AHF were prospectively included.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS

According to MEESSI-AHF score, patients were stratified in four categories corresponding to mortality risk: low-, intermediate-, high- and very high-risk groups. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital during the 30-day period following admission to the Emergency Department (ED).

RESULTS

In total, 390 patients were included. The number of days alive and out of the hospital decreased significatively with increasing MEESSI-AHF risk groups, ranging from 21.2 days (20.3-22.3 days) for the low-risk, 20 days (19.3-20.5 days) for intermediate risk,18.6 days (17.6-19.6 days) for the high-risk and 17.9 days (16.9-18.9 days) very high-risk category.

CONCLUSION

Among patients admitted to ED for an episode of AHF, the MEESSI-AHF score estimates with good performance the number of days alive and out of the hospital.

SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines for the management of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax

INTRODUCTION

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is the presence of air in the pleural space, occurring in the absence of trauma and known lung disease. Standardized expert guidelines on PSP are needed due to the variety of diagnostic methods, therapeutic strategies and medical and surgical disciplines involved in its management.

METHODS

Literature review, analysis of the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology; proposals for guidelines rated by experts, patients and organizers to reach a consensus. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.

RESULTS

A large PSP is defined as presence of a visible rim along the entire axillary line between the lung margin and the chest wall and ≥ 2 cm at the hilum level on frontal chest X-ray. The therapeutic strategy depends on the clinical presentation: emergency needle aspiration for tension PSP; in the absence of signs of severity: conservative management (small PSP), needle aspiration or chest tube drainage (large PSP). Outpatient treatment is possible if a dedicated outpatient care system is previously organized. Indications, surgical procedures and perioperative analgesia are detailed. Associated measures, including smoking cessation, are described.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are a step towards PSP treatment and follow-up strategy optimization in France.

SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines for the management of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Endorsed by the French Speaking Society of Respiratory Diseases (SPLF), the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU), the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF), the French Society of Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SFCTCV)

INTRODUCTION

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is the presence of air in the pleural space, occurring in the absence of trauma and known lung disease. Standardized expert guidelines on PSP are needed due to the variety of diagnostic methods, therapeutic strategies and medical and surgical disciplines involved in its management.

METHODS

Literature review, analysis of literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology; proposals for guidelines rated by experts, patients, and organizers to reach a consensus. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.

RESULTS

A large PSP is defined as presence of a visible rim along the entire axillary line between the lung margin and the chest wall and ≥2 cm at the hilum level on frontal chest x-ray. The therapeutic strategy depends on the clinical presentation: emergency needle aspiration for tension PSP; in the absence of signs of severity: conservative management (small PSP), needle aspiration or chest tube drainage (large PSP). Outpatient treatment is possible if a dedicated outpatient care system is previously organized. Indications, surgical procedures and perioperative analgesia are detailed. Associated measures, including smoking cessation, are described.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are a step towards PSP treatment and follow-up strategy optimization in France.

Recommandations formalisées d’experts pour la prise en charge des pneumothorax spontanés primaires

Introduction : Le pneumothorax spontané primaire (PSP) est un épanchement gazeux dans la cavité pleurale, survenant hors traumatisme et pathologie respiratoire connue. Des recommandations formalisées d'experts sur le sujet sont justifiées par les pluralités de moyens diagnostiques, stratégies thérapeutiques et disciplines médicochirurgicales intervenant dans leur prise en charge.

Méthodes : Revue bibliographique, analyse de la littérature selon méthodologie GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) ; propositions de recommandations cotées par experts, patients et organisateurs pour obtenir un consensus. Seuls les avis d'experts avec accord fort ont été retenus.

Résultats : Un décollement sur toute la hauteur de la ligne axillaire et supérieur ou égal à 2 cm au niveau du hile à la radiographie thoracique de face définit la grande abondance. La stratégie thérapeutique dépend de la présentation clinique : exsufflation en urgence pour PSP suffocant ; en l'absence de signe de gravité : prise en charge conservatrice (faible abondance), exsufflation ou drainage (grande abondance). Le traitement ambulatoire est possible si organisation en amont de la filière. Les indications, procédures chirurgicales et l'analgésie périopératoire sont détaillées. Les mesures associées, notamment le sevrage tabagique, sont décrites.

Conclusion : Ces recommandations sont une étape de l'optimisation des stratégies de traitement et de suivi des PSP en France.

[Anaphylaxis and pathophysiology]

Anaphylaxis is the most severe of the allergic hypersensitivity reactions. It is caused by the release of mediators from blood components such as mast cells and basophils into the bloodstream. Anaphylaxis is a common disease, its diagnosis is clinical and, given its pathophysiology, the treatment of choice is adrenaline.

Guidelines for the choice of intravenous fluids for vascular filling in critically ill patients, 2021

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for the appropriate choice of fluid therapy for resuscitation of critically ill patients.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 24 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Emergency Medicine (Société française de médecine d'urgence, SFMU) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline elaboration process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide their assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Some recommendations were left ungraded.

METHODS

Four fields were defined: patients with sepsis or septic shock, patients with haemorrhagic shock, patients with acute brain failure, and patients during the peripartum period. For each field, the panel focused on two questions: (1) Does the use of colloids, as compared to crystalloids, reduce morbidity and mortality, and (2) Does the use of some specific crystalloids effectively reduce morbidity and mortality. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. The analysis of the literature and the recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFMU guideline panel provided nine statements on the appropriate choice of fluid therapy for resuscitation of critically ill patients. After two rounds of rating and various amendments, strong agreement was reached for 100% of the recommendations. Out of these recommendations, two have a high level of evidence (Grade 1 +/-), six have a moderate level of evidence (Grade 2 +/-), and one is based on expert opinion. Finally, no recommendation was formulated for two questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial agreement among experts has been obtained to provide a sizable number of recommendations aimed at optimising the choice of fluid therapy for resuscitation of critically ill patients.

Sarilumab in adults hospitalised with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia (CORIMUNO-SARI-1): An open-label randomised controlled trial

Background

Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia can have increased inflammation and elevated cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, which might be deleterious. Thus, sarilumab, a high-affinity anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, might improve the outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods

We did a multicentric, open-label, Bayesian randomised, adaptive, phase 2/3 clinical trial, nested within the CORIMUNO-19 cohort, to test a superiority hypothesis. Patients 18 years or older hospitalised with COVID-19 in six French centres, requiring at least 3L/min of oxygen but without ventilation assistance and a WHO Clinical Progression Scale [CPS] score of 5 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based system, according to a randomisation list stratified on centre and with blocks randomly selected among 2 and 4, to receive usual care plus 400 mg of sarilumab intravenously on day 1 and on day 3 if clinically indicated (sarilumab group) or usual care alone (usual care group). Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with WHO-CPS scores greater than 5 on the 10-point scale on day 4 and survival without invasive or non-invasive ventilation at day 14. This completed trial is closed to new participants and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324073.

Findings

165 patients were recruited from March 27 to April 6, 2020, and 148 patients were randomised (68 patients to the sarilumab group and 80 to the usual care group) and followed up for 90 days. Median age was 61·7 years [IQR 53·0–71·1] in the sarilumab group and 62·8 years [56·0–71·7] in the usual care group. In the sarilumab group 49 (72%) of 68 were men and in the usual care group 59 (78%) of 76 were men. Four patients in the usual care group withdrew consent and were not analysed. 18 (26%) of 68 patients in the sarilumab group had a WHO-CPS score greater than 5 at day 4 versus 20 (26%) of 76 in the usual care group (median posterior absolute risk difference 0·2%; 90% credible interval [CrI] −11·7 to 12·2), with a posterior probability of absolute risk difference greater than 0 of 48·9%. At day 14, 25 (37%) patients in the sarilumab and 26 (34%) patients in the usual care group needed ventilation or died, (median posterior hazard ratio [HR] 1·10; 90% CrI 0·69–1·74) with a posterior probability HR greater than 1 of 37·4%. Serious adverse events occurred in 27 (40%) patients in the sarilumab group and 28 (37%) patients in the usual care group (p=0·73).

Interpretation

Sarilumab treatment did not improve early outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of sarilumab on long-term survival.

Funding

Assistance publique—Hôpitaux de Paris

[Pharmacological and multimodal care of the adult patient with psychiatric presentation in the emergency department]

The pharmacological management of patients with psychiatric presentations, on prescription, and by nurses in emergency medicine structures is based on knowledge of a limited number of molecules and their methods of administration. This is accompanied by a relational approach and techniques to ensure the safety of the teams in the case of an agitated or very resistant patient.

Profil évolutif clinique des patients adultes infectés à SARS-CoV-2 et hospitalisés à partir du service des urgences de Strasbourg

Introduction : La prise en charge de l’épidémie de Covid-19 dans un service d’urgences (SU) requiert une évaluation de ses critères de gravité. La Covid-19 est évolutive et l’aggravation respiratoire détermine le pronostic. Notre objectif était de rechercher les facteurs prédictifs de gravité en fonction du délai d’initiation d’une oxygénothérapie dans une population française atteinte de Covid-19 au sein d’un SU.

Matériels et méthode : L’étude observationnelle rétrospective aux Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, durant la première vague de la pandémie, incluait les patients hospitalisés depuis le SU en 2020 pour infection au SARS-CoV-2. Elle évaluait les délais entre le début des symptômes (J0) et l’initiation d’une oxygénothérapie, et entre J0 et l’apparition des complications hospitalières. L’analyse multivariée recherchait les facteurs associés à l’oxygénothérapie précoce et à la mortalité intra-hospitalière.

Résultats : 699 patients ont été inclus. L’oxygénothérapie était initiée le 7 ± 4e jour, la ventilation mécanique le 9 ± 4e jour. L’initiation précoce d’oxygénothérapie (avant le 6e jour) était significativement et indépendamment associée à l’immunosuppression, à l’âge ≥ 75 ans, à l’hypertension artérielle, et au sexe féminin. La mortalité intra-hospitalière était significativement et indépendamment associée à un âge ≥ 75 ans, une immunosuppression, une cardiopathie ischémique, et une oxygénothérapie précoce.

Conclusion : Parmi les patients hospitalisés pour la Covid-19 durant la première vague, le jour moyen d’initiation d’oxygénothérapie était le septie jour. Une oxygénothérapie précoce, un âge ≥ 75 ans, une immunosuppression et une cardiopathie ischémique étaient associés à une forme grave de la Covid-19.

Rapid Antigen Test Combined with Chest Computed Tomography to Rule Out COVID-19 in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

Correct and timely identification of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients is critical in the emergency department (ED) prior to admission to medical wards. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are a rapid alternative to Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the diagnosis of COVID-19 but have lower sensitivity.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance in real-life conditions of a strategy combining Ag-RDT and chest computed tomography (CT) to rule out COVID-19 infection in 1015 patients presenting in the ED between 16 November 2020 and 18 January 2021 in order to allow non-COVID-19 patients to be hospitalized in dedicated units directly. The combined strategy performed in the ED for patients with COVID-19 symptoms was assessed and compared with RT-PCR.

RESULTS

Compared with RT-PCR, the negative predictive value was 96.7% for Ag-RDT alone, 98.5% for Ag-RDT/CT combined, and increased to 100% for patients with low viral load.

CONCLUSION

A strategy combining Ag-RDT and chest CT is effective in ruling out COVID-19 in ED patients with high precision.

Recommandations de pratique clinique sur la prise en charge du patient adulte à présentation psychiatrique dans les structures d’urgences

De nombreux patients consultant aux urgences souffrent de pathologies psychiatriques préexistantes ou ont une symptomatologie évocatrice d’une pathologie psychiatrique. En effet, les troubles psychiatriques touchent un adulte sur quatre, et 75%des affections psychiatriques débutent avant l’âge de 25 ans. Le parcours de soins d’un patient adulte à présentation psychiatrique dans les structures d’urgences concerne de multiples intervenants. La complexité inhérente à ces patients complexes ainsi qu’à l’interdisciplinarité induite dans la prise en charge impose un cadre de prise en charge clair et consensuel. Des experts de la psychiatrie, de la gérontopsychiatrie et de la médecine d’urgence se sont réunis pour émettre ces recommandations de bonnes pratiques. Le choix de présenter des recommandations de bonnes pratiques et non des recommandations formalisées d’experts a été fait devant l’insuffisance de littérature de fort niveau de preuve dans certaines thématiques et de l’existence de controverses. À travers ces recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques, ils se sont attachés à décrire la prise en charge de ses patients aussi bien en préqu’en intrahospitalier. Les objectifs de ces recommandations sont de présenter les éléments indispensables à l’organisation du parcours de soins de ces patients, la gestion de l’agitation ainsi que la prise en charge pharmacologique ou non. Une partie spécifique est consacrée aux aspects réglementaires.

Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning

BACKGROUND

Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis.

METHODS

A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.

Pre-Hospital Management of Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 outbreak had a major impact on healthcare systems worldwide. Our study aims to describe the characteristics and therapeutic emergency mobile service (EMS) management of patients with vital distress due to COVID-19, their in-hospital care pathway and their in-hospital outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective and multicentric study was conducted in the six main centers of the French Greater East region, an area heavily impacted by the pandemic. All patients requiring EMS dispatch and who were admitted straight to the intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Clinical data from their pre-hospital and hospital management were retrieved.

RESULTS

We included a total of 103 patients (78.6% male, median age 68). In the initial stage, patients were in a critical condition (median oxygen saturation was 72% (60-80%)). In the field, 77.7% (CI 95%: 71.8-88.3%) were intubated. Almost half of our population (45.6%, CI 95%: 37.1-56.9%) had clinical Phenotype 1 (silent hypoxemia), while the remaining half presented Phenotype 2 (acute respiratory failure). In the ICU, a great number had ARDS (77.7%, CI 95% 71.8-88.3% with a PaO2/FiO2 < 200). In-hospital mortality was 33% (CI 95%: 24.6-43.3%). The two phenotypes showed clinical and radiological differences (respiratory rate, OR = 0.98, p = 0.02; CT scan lesion extension >50%, OR = 0.76, p < 0.03). However, no difference was found in terms of overall in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.07, p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

The clinical phenotypes appear to be very distinguishable in the pre-hospital field, yet no difference was found in terms of mortality. This leads us to recommend an identical management in the initial phase, despite the two distinct presentations.

Patients with Initial Negative RT-PCR and Typical Imaging of COVID-19: Clinical Implications

The sensitivity of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been questioned due to negative results in some patients who were strongly suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of our study was to analyze the prognosis of infected patients with initial negative RT-PCR in the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study included two cohorts of adult inpatients admitted into the ED. All patients who were suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who underwent a typical chest CT imaging were included. Thus, we studied two distinct cohorts: patients with positive RT-PCR (PCR+) and those with negative initial RT-PCR (PCR–). The data were analyzed using Bayesian methods. We included 66 patients in the PCR– group and 198 in the PCR+ group. The baseline characteristics did not differ except in terms of a proportion of lower chronic respiratory disease in the PCR– group. We noted a less severe clinical presentation in the PCR– group (lower respiratory rate, lower oxygen need and mechanical ventilation requirement). Hospital mortality (9.1% vs. 9.6%) did not differ between the two groups. Despite an initially less serious clinical presentation, the mortality of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 with a negative RT-PCR did not differ from those with positive RT-PCR.

[Emergency overcrowding and hospital organization: Causes and solutions]

Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a silent killer. Thus, several studies in different countries have described an increase in mortality, a decrease in the quality of care and prolonged hospital stays associated with ED overcrowding. Causes are multiple: input and in particular lack of access to lab test and imaging for general practitioners, throughput and unnecessary or time-consuming tasks, and output, in particular the availability of hospital beds for unscheduled patients. The main cause of overcrowding is waiting time for available beds in hospital wards, also known as boarding. Solutions to resolve the boarding problem are mostly organisational and require the cooperation of all department and administrative levels through efficient bed management. Elderly and polypathological patients wait longer time in ED. Internal Medicine, is the ideal specialty for these complex patients who require time for observation and evaluation. A strong partnership between the ED and the internal medicine department could help to reduce ED overcrowding by improving care pathways.

Prise en charge de l’exacerbation sévère d’asthme

Contexte : La Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence, la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française et le GroupeFrancophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques ont émis des recommandations sur la prise en charge del’exacerbation sévère d’asthme (ESA) chez l’enfant et l’adulte.Résultats : Les recommandations ont concerné 5 champs : diagnostic, traitement pharmacologique, modalités d’oxygénothérapie et de ventilation, orientation du patient, spécifi cités de la femme enceinte. L’analyse de la littérature et laformulation des recommandations ont été conduites selon la méthode GRADE (Grade of Recommendation Assessment,Development and Evaluation). Une recherche bibliographique portant sur les publications indexées dans les bases dedonnées PubMed™ et Cochrane™ a été réalisée.Sur les 21 recommandations formalisées obtenues, 4 avaient un niveau de preuve élevé (GRADE 1+/-) et 7 un niveaude preuve faible (GRADE 2 +/-). Pour 10 recommandations, la méthode GRADE n’a pas pu être appliquée, résultanten un avis d’experts. Un accord fort a été obtenu pour toutes les recommandations.Conclusion : Le travail conjoint de 36 experts issus de 3 sociétés savantes a permis d’obtenir 21 recommandations formalisées pour aider à la prise en charge aux urgences et en soins intensifs des patients adultes et pédiatriques avec une ESA.

Diagnostic et Prise en Charge de l’Acidose Métabolique Recommandations formalisées d’experts communes Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF) – Société française de médecine d’urgence (SFMU)

L’acidose métabolique est un trouble fréquemment rencontré en médecine d’urgence et en médecine intensive réanimation. La littérature s’étant enrichie de nouvelles données concernant la prise en charge de l’acidose métabolique, la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF) et la Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence (SFMU) ont élaboré des recommandations formalisées d’experts selon la méthodologie GRADE. Les champs de la stratégie diagnostique, de l’orientation et de la prise en charge thérapeutique ont été traités et vingt-neuf recommandations ont été formulées : quatre recommandations fortes (Grade 1), dix recommandations faibles (Grade 2) et quinze avis d’experts. Toutes ont obtenu un accord fort. L’application des méthodes d’Henderson-Hasselbalch et de Stewart pour le diagnostic du mécanisme de l’acidose métabolique est discutée et un algorithme diagnostique est proposé. L’utilisation de la cétonémie et des lactatémies veineuse et capillaire est également traitée. L’intérêt du pH, de la lactatémie et de sa cinétique pour l’orientation des patients en pré-hospitalier et aux urgences est envisagé. Enfin, les modalités de l’insulinothérapie au cours de l’acidocétose diabétique, les indications de la perfusion de bicarbonate de sodium et de l’épuration extra-rénale ainsi que les modalités de la ventilation mécanique au cours des acidoses métaboliques sévères sont traitées dans la prise en charge thérapeutique.

Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies

BACKGROUND

The French Emergency Medicine Society, the French Intensive Care Society and the Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine French-Speaking Group edited guidelines on severe asthma exacerbation (SAE) in adult and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

The guidelines were related to 5 areas: diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, oxygen therapy and ventilation, patients triage, specific considerations regarding pregnant women. The literature analysis and formulation of the guidelines were conducted according to the Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. An extensive literature research was conducted based on publications indexed in PubMed™ and Cochrane™ databases. Of the 21 formalized guidelines, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 7 a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). The GRADE method was inapplicable to 10 guidelines, which resulted in expert opinions. A strong agreement was reached for all guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The conjunct work of 36 experts from 3 scientific societies resulted in 21 formalized recommendations to help improving the emergency and intensive care management of adult and pediatric patients with SAE.

Diagnosis and management of metabolic acidosis: guidelines from a French expert panel

Metabolic acidosis is a disorder frequently encountered in emergency medicine and intensive care medicine. As literature has been enriched with new data concerning the management of metabolic acidosis, the French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française [SRLF]) and the French Emergency Medicine Society (Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence [SFMU]) have developed formalized recommendations from experts using the GRADE methodology. The fields of diagnostic strategy, patient assessment, and referral and therapeutic management were addressed and 29 recommendations were made: 4 recommendations were strong (Grade 1), 10 were weak (Grade 2), and 15 were experts’ opinions. A strong agreement from voting participants was obtained for all recommendations. The application of Henderson–Hasselbalch and Stewart methods for the diagnosis of the metabolic acidosis mechanism is discussed and a diagnostic algorithm is proposed. The use of ketosis and venous and capillary lactatemia is also treated. The value of pH, lactatemia, and its kinetics for the referral of patients in pre-hospital and emergency departments is considered. Finally, the modalities of insulin therapy during diabetic ketoacidosis, the indications for sodium bicarbonate infusion and extra-renal purification as well as the modalities of mechanical ventilation during severe metabolic acidosis are addressed in therapeutic management.

Évaluation de la couverture vaccinale antigrippale du personnel du pôle de médecine d’urgence du centre hospitalo-universitaire de Toulouse lors de la saison hivernale 2017–2018

Introduction : Plus de 677 000 patients ont consulté de décembre 2016 à avril 2017 en structure des urgences (SU) en Occitanie. La proportion de patients à risque de grippe grave est plus importante en SU que dans la population générale. Les professionnels de santé doivent être vaccinés pour lutter contre la propagation du virus ainsi que pour protéger les patients. L’objectif de notre étude était de connaître le taux de vaccination antigrippale parmi les professionnels de santé travaillant dans le pôle de médecine d’urgences (PMU) d’un centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) durant l’hiver 2017–2018.

Matériel et méthode : Nous avons réalisé une étude épidémiologique rétrospective monocentrique sur le PMU. Les critères d’inclusion étaient les professionnels de santé en poste (médecin, infirmier, interne ou aide-soignant) dans les SU de Purpan, Rangueil et/ou au service d’aide médicale urgente de Haute-Garonne (Samu 31) entre le 30 novembre 2017 et le 30 avril 2018. Le critère de jugement principal était défini par la proportion de professionnels de santé vaccinés. Les critères de jugement secondaires étaient la recherche de facteurs motivant la vaccination ou la nonvaccination. Les résultats étaient exprimés en pourcentages avec calcul de l’intervalle de confiance à 95 %.

Résultats : Deux cent trente-six professionnels de santé (59 %) ont répondu au questionnaire, 103 (44 %) étaient vaccinés contre la grippe. Les facteurs évoqués pour la vaccination étaient la protection des patients, se protéger soimême et son entourage. L’absence d’envie, l’impression de non-efficacité du vaccin, la peur des effets secondaires et la méconnaissance des principes de la vaccination étaient les facteurs retrouvés pour la non-vaccination.

Conclusion : Le taux de vaccination du personnel du PMU du CHU reste faible vis-à-vis des objectifs fixés par Santé publique France qui sont de 75 %. La mise en place d’un professionnel référent dans le service qui effectuerait une vaccination après information et sensibilisation est une piste à évaluer.