Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone

Intergroup statement: opportunistic salpingectomy-molecular pathology, clinical outcomes and implications for practice (German Ovarian Cancer Commission, the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NOGGO), AGO Austria and AGO Swiss)

Opportunistic salpingectomy is defined as the removal of both fallopian tubes as part of a surgical procedure planned for other reasons. The goal is primary prevention of ovarian cancer. The procedure is offered to patients who are not known to be at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. This is in contrast to high-risk patients with a germline mutation, particularly BRCA1/2, for whom risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is generally recommended. Premalignant cells and early occult cancers have been detected in RRSO specimens in the fimbrial funnel region, but not on the ovarian surface. The presence of mitoses, nuclear atypia, and staining in response to p53 mutation in these serous intraepithelial carcinomas (STIC) indicates the initial genetic changes in the fallopian tube mucosa that subsequently lead to the development of advanced peritoneal carcinomas. The identification of STICs has challenged the traditional view of the pathogenesis of the largest subset of epithelial ovarian cancers, namely the high-grade serous cancers of the ovary, fallopian tubes, and peritoneum. In a position statement published in 2015, the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Kommission Ovar recommended that patients be informed of the latest findings on the development and potential benefits of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy. This may reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer later in life. However, the scientific evidence has not been deemed sufficient to justify a general recommendation. In the same year, the Austrian AGO published a statement recommending the broad use of opportunistic salpingectomy without reservation. This review examines the current status of molecular pathology studies, recent evidence on the clinical implications of STIC, new data on the use of opportunistic salpingectomy, and published patient outcomes since then. The question of whether the potential benefit of opportunistic salpingectomy, outweighs the potential harms associated with surgical morbidity, which have not been conclusively excluded, should be revisited in light of these recent data.

FIGO position statement on opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy

Epithelial ovarian cancer, with the highest mortality rate among gynecologic malignancies, often goes undetected until advanced stages due to non-specific symptoms. Traditional prevention strategies such as bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) are limited to high-risk women and induce surgical menopause, often leading to significant health concerns. Recent findings suggest that many serous epithelial ovarian cancers originate in the fallopian tubes rather than the ovaries. This has led to the hypothesis that salpingectomy, with preservation of the ovaries, may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer while avoiding the adverse effects of early menopause. Studies show that bilateral salpingectomy (BS) significantly reduces ovarian cancer incidence even in average-risk women. Bilateral salpingectomy has been demonstrated to be safe with minimal added operative time, no adverse effects on ovarian function and is also cost effective. Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), at the time of non-gynecologic surgeries, is a promising strategy for reducing ovarian cancer risk, especially among average-risk women who have completed childbearing. It offers a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods. Emerging data supports incorporating OS into standard surgical practices for benign gynecologic conditions and considering it during unrelated abdominal/pelvic surgeries after adequate patient counseling and informed consent. Further training of non-gynecologic surgeons in OS is recommended to expand its preventive benefits.

An Incidental Fallopian Tube Focal Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Lesion (STIL) Discovered on a Postoperative Pathology Report Following Hysterectomy and Salpingectomy: A Case Report

A focal serous tubal intraepithelial lesion (STIL) is a rare lesion found on fallopian tubes that are characterized by atypical epithelial cells exhibiting morphological abnormalities with the accumulation of mutant p53 proteins. The p53 gene is a tumor suppressor gene, and when mutated gives rise to mutant p53 proteins that promote cancer cell growth and survival. We present a case of a 47-year-old gravida 2, para 2002 (G2P2) female who presented to the outpatient clinic with bilateral lower quadrant abdominal pain and back pain of four years' duration. The patient's history included endometriosis with lysis of adhesions and gynecological laparoscopy, leiomyomata, infertility, ovarian cyst, dysmenorrhea, two full term births, and Essure implants used for contraception; her family history included maternal grandfather with breast cancer. Multiple fibroids and endometriosis were confirmed on pelvic ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Due to worsening pain, the patient chose to have an elective hysterectomy and Essure implant removal with bilateral salpingectomy. The postoperative pathology report revealed a right fallopian tube with a STIL. Multiple genetic mutations are known to contribute to the development of STILs including p53 and the breast cancer gene (BRCA). There are two BRCA genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, that have many functions including producing proteins that repair damaged DNA. When mutated, this allows cells to divide and change rapidly, leading to certain types of cancer. Given the patient's family history of breast cancer, the patient was tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 for which the results were negative. However, even without having a BRCA mutation that is known to increase the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers, STILs continue to pose an increased risk of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This case demonstrates the reasoning behind prophylactic salpingectomies alongside hysterectomies and the significance of the postoperative pathology report from gynecological procedures.

Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany

PURPOSE

The most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany.

METHODS

(1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005-2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis).

RESULTS

(1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years.

CONCLUSION

Mounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.

Long-Term Health Consequences After Ovarian Removal at Benign Hysterectomy : A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

More evidence is needed to substantiate current recommendations about removing ovaries during hysterectomy for benign conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes in women with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) during hysterectomy for benign conditions.

DESIGN

Emulated target trial using data from a population-based cohort.

SETTING

Women in Denmark aged 20 years or older during 1977 to 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

142 985 women with hysterectomy for a benign condition, 22 974 with BSO and 120 011 without.

INTERVENTION

Benign hysterectomy with or without BSO.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were overall hospitalization for cardiovascular disease (CVD), overall cancer incidence, and all-cause mortality through December 2018.

RESULTS

Compared with women without BSO, women with BSO who were younger than 45 years at surgery had a higher 10-year cumulative risk for hospitalization for CVD (risk difference [RD], 1.19 percentage points [95% CI, 0.09 to 2.43 percentage points]). Women with BSO had a higher 10-year cumulative risk for cancer for ages 45 to 54 years (RD, 0.73 percentage point [CI, 0.05 to 1.38 percentage points]), 55 to 64 years (RD, 1.92 percentage points [CI, 0.69 to 3.25 percentage points]), and 65 years or older (RD, 2.54 percentage points [CI, 0.91 to 4.25 percentage points]). Women with BSO had higher 10-year mortality in all age groups, although the differences were statistically significant only for ages 45 to 54 years (RD, 0.79 percentage point [CI, 0.27 to 1.30 percentage points]). The mortality at 20 years was inconsistent with that at 10 years in women aged 65 years or older.

LIMITATION

Age was a proxy for menopausal status.

CONCLUSION

The authors find that these results support current recommendations for conserving ovaries in premenopausal women without a high risk for ovarian cancer and suggest a cautious approach in postmenopausal women.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

The Danish Cancer Society's Scientific Committee and the Mermaid Project.

HOPPSA update: changes in the study protocol of Hysterectomy and OPPortunistic SAlpingectomy, a registry-based randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The HOPPSA trial is a multi-center national registry-based randomized controlled trial to test the safety and effectiveness of performing opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The study protocol was first published in January 2019 and is available at https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-3083-8 . Here, we report amendments made to the study protocol since commencement of the trial.

CHANGES IN METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes analyses have been changed. (1) Complications will be analyzed using binomial generalized estimating equation (GEE) with log link function, while the unadjusted analyses according to Miettinen and Nurminen will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. (2) Absolute change in Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) will primarily be analyzed using a mixed effects model, adjusted for baseline MRS and center as a random effect. (3) Time to EOC will be analyzed using the mixed effects Cox regression model with center as random effect, while the unadjusted log-rank test will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome Complications will be based solely on the specific assessment in the GynOp quality registry. The Clavien-Dindo classification will be evaluated as a secondary outcome. Furthermore, MRS is also measured three years postoperatively to better pinpoint the onset of menopausal symptoms.

DISCUSSION

The changes to the protocol mainly concern the analyses of data. No changes to recruitment, randomization, intervention, or follow-up of primary outcomes have been made. An interim analysis during 2021 concluded that the study should continue until the target sample size is reached.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03045965 . Registered 8 February 2017.

Quality of life and sexual function in patients aged 35 years or younger undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how hysterectomy performed for benign gynecologic pathologies affects the quality of life and sexual function of patients aged 35 years or younger, and if outcomes differ according to the surgical technique.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH), or vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for benign uterine disorders between April 2014 and June 2020 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany, were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Quality of life and sexual function were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using standardized validated questionnaires: the European Quality of Life Five-Dimension Scale (EQ-5D) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).

RESULTS

Thirty-three (45%) patients underwent TLH, 25 (34%) underwent SLH, and 15 (21%) patients underwent VH. The median preoperative EQ-5D score, FSFI score, and EQ-5D visual analog scale were 0.9 (range 0.62-1), 19.25 (range 2.4-27.4), and 50 (range 0-100); postoperative scores were 1 (range 0.61-1), 24.15 (range 3.9-29.3), and 90 (range 30-100), respectively (P ≤ 0.001). Postoperative scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores, with no significant difference according to the surgical technique.

CONCLUSION

Hysterectomy for benign indication in women aged 35 years or less significantly improved the patients' quality of life and sexual function with no differences regarding the surgical technique.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the German trial registry (no. DRKS00005622).

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function

Background

There are conflicting reports on status of ovarian function after hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy in premenopausal women. The present study was undertaken to understand the effect of salpingectomy done at the time of hysterectomy on ovarian reserve and function as measured by serum AMH and FSH levels before and after the surgery.

Methods

This was a prospective study conducted on 60 women who underwent hysterectomy at our tertiary care centre, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of medical and health sciences, Dehradun, from January 2020 to September 2021. Serum AMH and FSH levels were monitored preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy and hysterectomy without salpingectomy.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 41.83 yrs in group 1 and 43.73 yrs in group 2 [p value = 0.078]. Most common indication of hysterectomy was AUB-L in both the groups (86% and 80%, respectively). Mean operative time was 115.50 min in group 1 and 114.40 min in group 2 [p value = 0.823]. Mean intra-operative blood loss was 214 ml in group 1 and 199.33 ml in group 2 [p value = 0.087]. Serum AMH and FSH were insignificantly decreased in both the groups post-operatively after 3 months, and the difference between both groups was also not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Salpingectomy done at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications with preservation of ovaries did not have any short-term adverse effects on ovarian reserve and function.

Patients' and professionals' perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study

BACKGROUND

To prevent ovarian cancer, several international societies have issued guidelines which recommend to discuss opportunistic salpingectomy with women undergoing pelvic surgery after completion of childbearing. The opportunistic salpingectomy refers to the additional removal of Fallopian tubes during pelvic surgery for another indication to reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer. These recommendations emphasize the importance of counselling on benefits and risks of opportunistic salpingectomy but offer no guidance on their implementation in daily practice. The lack of a tailored implementation strategy has resulted in a wide variation in current practice. To reduce this practice variation, we identified influencing factors on implementing opportunistic salpingectomy from patients' and professionals' perspectives.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-method study between 2019 and 2020 throughout the Netherlands. In a qualitative phase, we conducted interviews with gynecologic patients (N = 11) and their professionals (N = 20) to explore barriers and facilitators, using an interview guide. In the quantitative phase, we quantified these barriers and facilitators among patients who underwent a hysterectomy or sterilization and were counselled on the opportunistic salpingectomy (N = 77), and members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (N = 204), using questionnaires. For both phases, barriers and facilitators were classified into the following domains: innovation, patient, healthcare professional, social setting, organization, and economic and political context.

RESULTS

For patients, main barriers were lack of knowledge about: the existence of the opportunistic salpingectomy (45%), size of the surgery (44%) and its associated possible disadvantages (37%). In addition, patients attributed their reluctance to concerns about the removal of healthy organs (46%). For professionals, main barriers were: patients' lack of knowledge of the size of surgery (85%) and its associated possible disadvantages (77%), the gap in evidence on long term risks and benefits (43%), the lack of feasibility in certain patients and during vaginal surgery (66%). Both patients (41%) and professionals (67%) identified the need for counselling material as facilitator.

CONCLUSION

To reduce the variety in care regarding opportunistic salpingectomy, consensus and uniform counselling is needed. Including the opportunistic salpingectomy in gynecological guidelines and a decision aid for counselling could serve as tools to facilitate implementation.

Physician attitudes and knowledge on prophylactic salpingectomy in perimenopausal patients

•

Cancer risk reduction is of paramount importance when considering salpingectomy.

•

Prophylactic salpingectomy performed in more than 75% of patients.

•

Patients with preconceived notions of ovarian removal can be difficult to counsel.

•

Knowledge gaps persist around the risks and benefits of salpingectomy.

Purpose

Eighty percent of the approximately 500,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the US are for benign indications. There is lack of consensus regarding concurrent removal of fallopian tubes and/or ovaries. Ovarian cancer risk reduction is the principal benefit but the adverse consequences of ovarian removal can include vasomotor disturbance, vaginal dryness, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cognitive decline. Emerging evidence on the role of fallopian tubes in ovarian carcinogenesis and the consequences of oophorectomy have led the American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists (ACOG) to recommend bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian conservation during benign hysterectomy for women at population risk for ovarian cancer.

Methods

Five hundred members of the ACOG Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN) were randomly selected to participate in this survey study.

Results

165 completed the survey (35.3% response rate). Most respondents reported that a family history of breast, ovarian or colon cancer and patient age influence their decision to offer salpingectomy more than 75% of the time. Factors that a majority of respondents reported discussing during counseling included possible ovarian cancer risk reduction, surgical menopause, severity of symptoms, and the effects on bone and cardiovascular health. The respondents mean score for the knowledge-based questions was only 1.7 (±0.92) out of 4 points.

Conclusion

Several factors may affect decision making for prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy however paramount among these is cancer risk reduction. Most physicians found it difficult to discuss and implement a change in care for patients with preconceived notions of ovarian preservation or removal.

The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy

BACKGROUND

Bilateral salpingectomy has been proposed to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, but it is not clear whether the surgery affects ovarian reserve. This study compares the impact of laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease with or without prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve.

METHODS

Records were reviewed for 373 premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian reserve for benign uterine diseases. The serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and three-dimensional antral follicle count (AFC) were assessed before surgery and 3 and 9 months postoperatively to evaluate ovarian reserve. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy. The incidence of pelvic diseases was monitored until the ninth month after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two surgery groups in terms of baseline AMH, E2, FSH, LH, and AFC (all P > 0.05). There was no difference in potential bias factors, including patient age, operative time, and blood loss (all P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between the two groups 3 months after surgery with respect to AMH (P = 0.763), E2 (P = 0.264), FSH (P = 0.478), LH (P = 0.07), and AFC (P = 0.061). Similarly, there were no differences between groups 9 months after surgery for AMH (P = 0.939), E2 (P = 0.137), FSH (P = 0.276), LH (P = 0.07) and AFC (P = 0.066). At 9 months after the operation, no patients had malignant ovarian tumors. The incidences of benign ovarian tumors in the salpingectomy group were 0 and 2.68 % at 3 and 9 months after surgery, respectively, and the corresponding values in the control group were 0 and 5.36 %. The incidences of pelvic inflammatory disease in the salpingectomy group were 10.72 and 8.04 % at 3 and 9 months after surgery, respectively, while corresponding values in the control group were 24.13 and 16.09 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy did not damage the ovarian reserve of reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy might be a good method to prevent the development of ovarian cancer. Larger clinical trials with longer follow-up times are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits.

Laparoscopic Pectopexy-CUSUM Learning Curve and Perioperative Complications Analysis

The study aimed to examine the learning curve and perioperative complications for laparoscopic pectopexy (LP). A total of 60 women with stage II–IV apical prolapse who underwent LP were dichotomized into groups: LSH(+) with concomitant laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH), LSH(−) after previous supracervical/total hysterectomy. Operative time, estimated blood loss and hospitalization length were evaluated with cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis and the Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) test, separately for two surgeons (A and B). Intraoperative and perioperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo (C–D) classification were analyzed. Mean operative time, change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative hospital stay were 143.5 ± 23.1 min—1.5 ± 0.5g/dL and 2.5 ± 0.9 days, respectively. LSH during pectopexy was associated with longer operative time (p = 0.01) but not with higher intraoperative bleeding or prolonged hospital stay. Severe complications rate was low (1.7%) with one bowel injury in LSH(−) (C–D grade IIIb). No C–D grade II, IV and V complications were found. Conversion to open pectopexy, return to the operating room or blood transfusion were not required. The KPSS test showed that a steady operative time for Surgeon A was achieved after 28 procedures. A proficiency for laparoscopic pectopexy based on CUSUM analysis was observed after 38–40 procedures.

Bridging different realities - a qualitative study on patients' experiences of preoperative care for benign hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy in Sweden

Background

Hysterectomy is a common procedure worldwide and removing healthy fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy (opportunistic salpingectomy) to possibly prevent ovarian cancer is increasing in frequency, but still controversial. The experiences and perceptions of women, eligible for the procedure, have not been previously investigated.

This study aims to, among women waiting to undergo hysterectomy, explore i) experiences and perceptions of self and healthcare in relation to their elective surgery, ii) perceptions of risks and benefits of hysterectomy, including opportunistic salpingectomy.

Methods

A qualitative study, with focus group discussions including women < 55 years, planned for hysterectomy with ovarian preservation, was performed. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling from six gynecological departments in different parts of Sweden, including both country and university hospitals. Focus group discussions were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide, digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by qualitative manifest and latent content analysis.

Results

Twenty-one Swedish-speaking women participated. They were 40–53 years of age, reported varying educational levels, countries of birth and indications for hysterectomy. Analysis rendered a theme “Bridging different realities” over four categories: “Being a woman today”, “Experiencing and managing body failure”, “Navigating the healthcare system” and “Processing continuously until surgery”, including 17 subcategories. The participants displayed varying attitudes towards the significance of their uterus in being a woman. A vague understanding of their body was described, leading to fear related to the reasons for surgery as well as surgery itself. Participants described difficulties understanding and recalling information but also stated that insufficient information was provided. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy varied. Involvement in decisions regarding the hysterectomy and potential opportunistic salpingectomy was perceived to be dependent on the counselling gynecologist.

Conclusions

The theme Bridging different realities captures the complexity of women deciding on removal of their uterus, and possibly fallopian tubes. It also describes the women’s interactions with healthcare and perceived difference between the health professionals and the women’s perception of the situation, as viewed by the women. Bridging the different realities faced by patients is required to enable shared decision-making, through sufficient support from healthcare.

Risk-Reducing Gynecological Surgery in Lynch Syndrome: Results of an International Survey from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database

Purpose: To survey risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) practice and advice regarding hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women with Lynch syndrome. Methods: We conducted a survey in 31 contributing centers from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD), which incorporates 18 countries worldwide. The survey covered local policies for risk-reducing hysterectomy and BSO in Lynch syndrome, the timing when these measures are offered, the involvement of stakeholders and advice regarding HRT. Results: Risk-reducing hysterectomy and BSO are offered to path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers in 20/21 (95%) contributing centers, to path_MSH6 carriers in 19/21 (91%) and to path_PMS2 carriers in 14/21 (67%). Regarding the involvement of stakeholders, there is global agreement (~90%) that risk-reducing surgery should be offered to women, and that this discussion may involve gynecologists, genetic counselors and/or medical geneticists. Prescription of estrogen-only HRT is offered by 15/21 (71%) centers to women of variable age range (35–55 years). Conclusions: Most centers offer risk-reducing gynecological surgery to carriers of path_MLH1, path_MSH2 and path_MSH6 variants but less so for path_PMS2 carriers. There is wide variation in how, when and to whom this is offered. The Manchester International Consensus Group developed recommendations to harmonize clinical practice across centers, but there is a clear need for more research.

Subsequent Development of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Ovarian Surgery for Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Purpose

The goal of the current study is to determine the risk of subsequent development of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in women after ovarian surgery for benign ovarian tumors.

Patients and Methods

We conducted the nationwide population-based historic cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. Eleven thousand six hundred twenty women who underwent ovarian surgery for ovarian benign diseases were analyzed. The collected data included age, types of ovarian surgery, medical history by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), infertility (yes/no), pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) (yes/no), tubal ligation (yes/no), total/subtotal hysterectomy (TH/STH) (yes/no), and endometrioma (yes/no). We used the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test to evaluate the risk factors. Cox proportional hazard methods were used to evaluate risk factors for the subsequent development of EOC. Multivariate analysis using Cox stepwise forward regression was conducted for the covariate selected in univariate analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Wald test.

Results

Subsequent EOC incidence rate (IR, incidence per 10,000 person-years) of women after ovarian surgery for benign ovarian tumors was 2.98. Separating into four groups based on different age, IR of EOC was 1.57 (<30 years), 4.71 (30-39 years), 3.59 (40-49 years) and 0.94 (≥50 years), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified only high level of CCI (≥2 or more) as an independent risk factor for subsequent development of EOC in women after ovarian surgery for benign ovarian tumors (HR 59.17, 95% CI 7.50-466.80 in women with CCI level of 2 and HR 190.68, 95% CI 24.33-2494.19, in women with CCI level ≥3, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results, if confirmed, suggest that women with other comorbidities (CCI) should be well informed that they may have a higher risk of subsequent development of EOC when ovarian surgery is planned even though the final pathology showed a benign ovarian tumor.

Rationale for opportunistic salpingectomy during gynecological surgery for a benign condition: A review of the available literature

INTRODUCTION

Recent discoveries have shed light on the benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy in the prevention of ovarian cancer. However, in this time of increasing interest in the parameters of ovarian reserve, there are no national recommendations on the subject. This literature review provides an enlightened look at the rationale for performing an opportunistic salpingectomy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and risks associated with opportunistic salpingectomy during surgery for a benign gynecological condition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of the literature using the Pubmed/Medline search engine and the Cochrane database.

RESULTS

A total of 61 articles were selected from over 300 references. The protective impact against cancer, which is widely demonstrated in the literature, is proof of the benefit of this procedure. Furthermore, no increase in intraoperative morbidity has been noted. However, the clinical impact on the ovarian reserve remains uncertain (in particular the occurrence of early pre-menopausal symptoms during the perimenopausal period). Nonetheless, the socioeconomic analysis supports performing opportunistic salpingectomy.

CONCLUSION

Performing opportunistic salpingectomy does not appear to cause an increase in morbidity but the impact on ovarian function is uncertain. The fact that there is a proven benefit of such a procedure against cancer indicates that prior to any surgery a clear discussion should be held with the patient in which they should be fully informed.