1
|
Lu QP, Wu Y, Mao XD, Wan HJ, Shao J, Yu QK, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Wang CY. Continuous quality improvement project to reduce the downtime of medical linear accelerators: A case study at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30668. [PMID: 38774097 PMCID: PMC11107096 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To analyse and continually improve existing issues in the quality improvement process of medical linear accelerators (LINACs) and enhance the quality control management of LINACs. Methods Data were collected from eight LINACs (sourced from three manufacturers) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital using Excel diaries between January 2019 and December 2020. The data description and analysis were performed using the analytic hierarchy process, SPSSAU and Excel software, and mean-time-to-repair (MTTR)/mean-time-between-failure (MTBF) metrics. Continuous quality improvement was executed using the quality control circle (QCC) quality management method. Results After quality improvement, the risk frequency of 'LINAC down' events decreased by 43.63% and downtime was reduced by 40.45%. The weight of downtime risk improved by 73.69%. The MTTR recovery value increased by 31.90%, and MTBF reliability increased by 2.97 h. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed quality improvement measures could effectively decrease the frequency and duration of downtimes, consequently extending the normal operational time of LINACs. Conclusion Transitioning from instant repair to preventative maintenance can enhance the operational efficiency of equipment and yield economic benefits for hospitals. The QCC method and the event risk evaluation model are effective in reducing the downtime of LINACs and improving their quality control management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Peng Lu
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong Wu
- Department of Purchasing, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Mao
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hua-Jun Wan
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jian Shao
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qi-Kai Yu
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yue Zhao
- Department of Purchasing, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ci-Yong Wang
- Department of Medical Engineering, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), 310022, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Q, Li Q, Wang Z, Yang C, Zhang D, Wang J, Wang P, Wang W. Characterization of a novel VenusX orthogonal dual-layer multileaf collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14357. [PMID: 38620027 PMCID: PMC11087167 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate and characterize the performance of a novel orthogonal dual-layer alpha multileaf collimator (αMLC) mounted on the LinaTech VenusX linac. METHODS We evaluated leaf positioning accuracy and reproducibility using an electronic portal imaging device through the picket fence test. The average, interleaf, intraleaf, and leaf tip transmissions of the single and dual layers were measured using an ionization chamber. Square and rhombus fields were used to evaluate the leaf penumbra of αMLC. To investigate the advantages of the orthogonal dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in field shaping, right triangular and circular pattern fields were formed using both the dual layers and single layers of the αMLC. RESULTS The average maximum positioning deviations of the upper and lower αMLC over 1 year were 0.76 ± 0.09 mm and 0.62 ± 0.07 mm, respectively. The average transmissions were 1.87%, 1.83%, and 0.03% for the upper-, lower- and dual-layer αMLC, respectively. The maximum interleaf transmissions of the lower- and dual-layer were 2.43% and 0.17%, respectively. The leaf tip transmissions were 9.34% and 0.25%, respectively. The penumbra of the square field was 6.2 mm in the X direction and 8.0 mm in the Y direction. The average penumbras of the rhombus fields with side lengths of 5 and 10 cm were 3.6 and 4.9 mm, respectively. For the right triangular and circular fields, the fields shaped by the dual-layer leaves were much closer to the set field than those shaped by single-layer leaves. The dose undulation amplitude of the 50% isodose lines and leaf stepping angle change of the dual-layer leaves were smaller than those of the single-layer leaves. CONCLUSIONS The αMLC benefits from its orthogonal dual-layer design. Leaf transmission, dose undulations at the field edge, and MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle of the dual-layer αMLC were remarkably reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingxin Wang
- School of Precision Instrument and Opto‐Electronics EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
| | - Qifeng Li
- School of Precision Instrument and Opto‐Electronics EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
| | - Zhongqiu Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
| | - Chengwen Yang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
| | - Daguang Zhang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Cancer Hospital Airport HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Cancer Hospital Airport HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalNational Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerKey Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and TherapyTianjinChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Cancer Hospital Airport HospitalTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cui W, Tian Y, Dai J. Novel multileaf collimator designs with tongues and grooves in leaf end and Monte Carlo simulations. Med Dosim 2024:S0958-3947(24)00010-4. [PMID: 38402060 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
In this study, we proposed 2 new multileaf collimator leaf designs to eliminate leaf gaps for closed leaf pairs so that radiation leakage can be avoided. In the new designs, multi tongues and grooves were added to the conventional multileaf collimators leaf ends. Thus, when a pair of leaves closed, tongues of a leaf can enter grooves of its opposing leaf. Consequently, there would be no radiation leakage through closed leaves. One design was named finger-shaped MLC, and another design with doubled leaf end thickness was named hand-shaped MLC. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to simulate dosimetric characteristics of the new MLC designs and comparison to conventional MLCs was performed. The simulations show that for the closed field, the new designs reduce leakage dramatically. And for the open field, the finger-shaped MLC has a larger penumbra width than conventional MLC, while the penumbra for the hand-shaped MLC is comparable to that of conventional MLC. With the application of new MLC designs, it is expected to eliminate leaf gaps for MLC usage and protect normal tissues better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun W, Shi Z, Yang X, Huang S, Liao C, Zhang W, Li Y, Huang X. The performance of a new type accelerator uRT-linac 506c evaluated by a quality assurance automation system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14226. [PMID: 38009990 PMCID: PMC10795434 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of our quality assurance (QA) automation system and to evaluate the machine performance of a new type linear accelerator uRT-linac 506c within 6 months using this system. METHODS This QA automation system consists of a hollow cylindrical phantom with 18 steel balls in the phantom surface and an analysis software to process electronic portal imaging device (EPID) measurement image data and report the results. The performance of the QA automation system was evaluated by the tests of repeatability, archivable precision, detectability of introduced errors, and the impact of set-up errors on QA results. The performance of this linac was evaluated by 31 items using this QA system over 6 months. RESULTS This QA system was able to automatically deliver QA plan, EPID image acquisition, and automatic analysis. All images acquiring and analysis took approximately 4.6 min per energy. The preset error of 0.1 mm in multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf were detected as 0.12 ± 0.01 mm for Bank A and 0.10 ± 0.01 mm in Bank B. The 2 mm setup error was detected as -1.95 ± 0.01 mm, -2.02 ± 0.01 mm, 2.01 ± 0.01 mm for X, Y, Z directions, respectively. And data from the tests of repeatability and detectability of introduced errors showed the standard deviation were all within 0.1 mm and 0.1°. and data of the machine performance were all within the tolerance specified by AAPM TG-142. CONCLUSIONS The QA automation system has high precision and good performance, and it can improve the QA efficiency. The performance of the new accelerator has also performed very well during the testing period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WenZhao Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Esophageal Cancer InstituteGuangzhouChina
| | - ZhongHua Shi
- Radiotherapy and Imaging R&D departmentShanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Xin Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
| | - SiJuan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
| | - Can Liao
- Radiotherapy and Imaging R&D departmentShanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Wei Zhang
- Radiotherapy and Imaging R&D departmentShanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - YongBao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
| | - XiaoYan Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineSun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tardi D, Fitriandini A, Fauziah AR, Wibowo WE, Siswantining T, Pawiro SA. Analysis of dose distribution reproducibility based on a fluence map of in vivo transit dose using an electronic portal imaging device. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 10:015013. [PMID: 38052064 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad124a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Morphological changes can affect distribution of dose in patients. Determination of the dose distribution changes for each fraction radiotherapy can be done by relativein vivodosimetry (IVD). This study analysed the distribution of doses per fraction based on the fluence map recorded by the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) of the patient's transit dose. This research examined cases involving the cervix, breast, and nasopharynx. Transit dose analysis was performed by calculating the gamma index (GI) with composite and field-by-field methods. The gamma passing rate (GPR) value was assessed for its correlation with the subject's body weight. In the case of the nasopharynx, breast, and cervix, the GPR value decreased as the fraction increased. In the case of the nasopharynx, the correlation between the GPR and fraction radiotherapy showed no difference when using either composite or field-by-field methods. However, in cases involving the cervix and breast, there was a difference in the correlation values between the composite and field-by-field methods, where the subject had a significant correlation (p< 0.05) when it was done using a field-by-field method. In addition, the nasopharynx had the highest number of subjects with significant correlation (p< 0.05) between GPR and body weight, followed by the cervix and breast. In the nasopharynx, breast, and cervix, the reproducibility of the dose distribution decreased. This decreased reproducibility was associated with changes in body weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didin Tardi
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
| | - Aninda Fitriandini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Annisa Rahma Fauziah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Wahyu Edy Wibowo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
| | - Titin Siswantining
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
| | - Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pogue JA, Cardenas CE, Harms J, Soike MH, Kole AJ, Schneider CS, Veale C, Popple R, Belliveau JG, McDonald AM, Stanley DN. Benchmarking Automated Machine Learning-Enhanced Planning With Ethos Against Manual and Knowledge-Based Planning for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101292. [PMID: 37457825 PMCID: PMC10344691 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Currently, there is insufficient guidance for standard fractionation lung planning using the Varian Ethos adaptive treatment planning system and its unique intelligent optimization engine. Here, we address this gap in knowledge by developing a methodology to automatically generate high-quality Ethos treatment plans for locally advanced lung cancer. Methods and Materials Fifty patients previously treated with manually generated Eclipse plans for inoperable stage IIIA-IIIC non-small cell lung cancer were included in this institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Fifteen patient plans were used to iteratively optimize a planning template for the Daily Adaptive vs Non-Adaptive External Beam Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial of an Individualized Approach for Toxicity Reduction (ARTIA-Lung); the remaining 35 patients were automatically replanned without intervention. Ethos plan quality was benchmarked against clinical plans and reoptimized knowledge-based RapidPlan (RP) plans, then judged using standard dose-volume histogram metrics, adherence to clinical trial objectives, and qualitative review. Results Given equal prescription target coverage, Ethos-generated plans showed improved primary and nodal planning target volume V95% coverage (P < .001) and reduced lung gross tumor volume V5 Gy and esophagus D0.03 cc metrics (P ≤ .003) but increased mean esophagus and brachial plexus D0.03 cc metrics (P < .001) compared with RP plans. Eighty percent, 49%, and 51% of Ethos, clinical, and RP plans, respectively, were "per protocol" or met "variation acceptable" ARTIA-Lung planning metrics. Three radiation oncologists qualitatively scored Ethos plans, and 78% of plans were clinically acceptable to all reviewing physicians, with no plans receiving scores requiring major changes. Conclusions A standard Ethos template produced lung radiation therapy plans with similar quality to RP plans, elucidating a viable approach for automated plan generation in the Ethos adaptive workspace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel A. Pogue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michael H. Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Adam J. Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Craig S. Schneider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Christopher Veale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Richard Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jean-Guy Belliveau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Andrew M. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Dennis N. Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang Y, Liu Z. Dosimetric performance evaluation of the Halcyon treatment platform for stereotactic radiotherapy: A pooled study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34933. [PMID: 37682167 PMCID: PMC10489306 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
With the advancement of radiotherapy equipment, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has been increasingly used. Among the many radiotherapy devices, Halcyon shows promising applications. This article reviews the dosimetric performance such as plan quality, plan complexity, and gamma passing rates of SRT plans with Halcyon to determine the effectiveness and safety of Halcyon SRT plans. This article retrieved the last 5 years of PubMed studies on the effectiveness and safety of the Halcyon SRT plans. Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts to decide whether to include the studies. A search was conducted to identify publications relevant to evaluating the dosimetric performance of SRT plans on Halcyon using the key strings Halcyon, stereotactic radiosurgery, SRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. A total of 18 eligible publications were retrieved. Compared to SRT plans on the TrueBeam, the Halcyon has advantages in terms of plan quality, plan complexity, and gamma passing rates. The high treatment speed of SRT plans on the Halcyon is impressive, while the results of its plan evaluation are also encouraging. As a result, Halcyon offers a new option for busy radiotherapy units while significantly improving patient comfort in treatment. For more accurate results, additional relevant publications will need to be followed up in subsequent studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zongwen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song Y, Yu X, Wang Y, Dong Y, Yuan Z. Accuracy analysis of different dose calculation algorithms for locally advanced pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. J Cancer 2023; 14:2694-2699. [PMID: 37779867 PMCID: PMC10539394 DOI: 10.7150/jca.87596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The dose distribution in different optimization algorithm plans of stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were compared and analyzed using monte carlo dose calculate algorithm (MC). Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 26 LAPC patients treated with SBRT. The SBRT plans were designed by raytracing (RT) and fine size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithms in the CyberKnife (CK) precision system, all of which met the requirements of clinical target dose and organ at risk (OAR). Keeping the original optimization parameters unchanged, the RT and FSPB algorithm plans were recalculated by MC algorithm. The accuracy of different algorithm plnas were compared and analyzed by using planning parameters and dose distribution. Results: There was no significant differences in the coverage and conformal index (CI) of the planned target volume (PTV) between RT and FSPB algorithm plans, but dose distribution of organ at risk (OAR) and the maximum dose outside the PTV boundary of 2 cm (D2cm) were lower in FSPB plans compared to RT plans, and this difference was statistically significant with p-values < 0.05. Compared to the MC algorithm, both RT algorithm and FSPB algorithm overestimated dose of the PTV and OAR. The RT algorithm was more consistent with the MC algorithm than the FSPB algorithm. The relative error of PTV coverage within the RT algorithm was 8.02% ± 1.53%, and the relative error range of OAR dose parameters was 3.32% -12.73%. Conclusion: Although the FSPB algorithm could achieve rapid dose drop-off around the PTV and lower dose distribution in the OAR for pancreatic cancer SBRT plans, the algorithm error were higher than the RT algorithm. RT and FSPB algorithm overestimated the dose in the target and OAR. That was important to evaluate the clinical plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongchun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuyao Yu
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuwen Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, 300308, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kawata K, Hirashima H, Tsuruta Y, Sasaki M, Matsushita N, Fujimoto T, Nakamura M, Nakata M. Applicability evaluation of the TRS-483 protocol for the determination of small-field output factors using different multi-leaf collimator and field-shaping types. Phys Med 2023; 113:102664. [PMID: 37573811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the applicability of TRS-483 output correction factors (CFs) for small-field output factors (OFs) using different multi-leaf collimators (MLC) and field-shaping types. METHODS All measurements were performed on TrueBeam, TrueBeam STx, and Halcyon using 6 MV flattening filter-free energy. Four detectors, including CC01, CC04, microDiamond, and EDGE, were used. Nominal field sizes ranging from 1 × 1 to 4 × 4, and 10 × 10 cm2 were used to measure small-field OFs at source-to-axis distance of 100 cm with a 0° gantry angle in a 3D water phantom. Further, the field-shaping types were defined using jaw collimator or MLC (five different configurations). A field size of 10 × 10 cm2 was used as the reference for calculation of OFs obtained as ratio of detector readings (OFdet). The percentage difference and coefficient of variation of OFdet and OFdet corrected by applying CF were compared for each field size and configuration. RESULTS For OFdet corrected by applying CF, the ranges of percentage difference and coefficient of variation in all configurations for ≥ 2 × 2 cm2 fields were reduced from 1.2-2.2 to 0.8-1.3 percentage points (%pt) and from 0.5-1.0 to 0.4-0.7%, respectively. For 1 × 1 cm2 field, the ranges of percentage difference and coefficient of variation were reduced from 3.3-5.7 to 1.2-2.2 %pt and from 2.2-3.7 to 0.8-1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The CFs described in TRS-483 dosimetry protocol have broad applicability in reducing OF variations between detectors under different MLC and field-shaping types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Kawata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Tsuruta
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Makoto Sasaki
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norimasa Matsushita
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fujimoto
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Manabu Nakata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rippke C, Renkamp CK, Attieh C, Schlüter F, Buchele C, Debus J, Alber M, Klüter S. Leaf-individual calibration for a double stack multileaf collimator in photon radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100477. [PMID: 37635846 PMCID: PMC10457557 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose In online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments, linear accelerator delivery accuracy is essential. Recently introduced double stack multileaf collimators (MLCs) have new facets in their calibration. We established a radiation-based leaf-individual calibration (LIMCA) method for double stack MLCs. Materials and Methods MLC leaf positions were evaluated from four cardinal angles with test patterns at measurement positions throughout the radiation field on EBT3 radiochromic film for each single stack. The accuracy of the method and repeatability of the results were assessed. The effect of MLC positioning errors was characterized for a measured output factor curve and a clinical patient plan. Results All positions in the motor step - position calibration file were optimized in the established LIMCA method. The resulting double stack mean accuracy for all angles was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm for X1 (left bank) and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm for X2 (right bank). The accuracy of the leaf position evaluation was 0.2 mm (95% confidence level). The MLC calibration remained stable over four months. Small MLC leaf position errors (e.g. 1.2 mm field size reduction) resulted in important dose errors (-5.8 %) for small quadratic fields of 0.83 × 0.83 cm2. Single stack position accuracy was essential for highly modulated treatment plans. Conclusions LIMCA is a new double stack MLC calibration method that increases treatment accuracy from four angles and for all moving leaves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - C. Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | | | - Fabian Schlüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core-center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Markus Alber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pokhrel D, Mallory R, Bernard ME, Kudrimoti M. How much rotational error is clinically acceptable for single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT treatment on halcyon ring delivery system (RDS)? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023:e14068. [PMID: 37311070 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE SBRT treatment of two separate lung lesions via single-isocenter/multi-target (SIMT) plan on Halcyon RDS could improve patient comfort, compliance, patient throughput, and clinic efficiency. However, aligning two separate lung lesions synchronously via a single pre-treatment CBCT scan on Halcyon can be difficult due to rotational patient setup errors. Thus, to quantify the dosimetric impact, we simulated loss of target(s) coverage due to small, yet clinically observable rotational patient setup errors on Halcyon for SIMT treatments. METHODS Seventeen previously treated 4D-CT based SIMT lung SBRT patients with two separate lesions (total 34 lesions, 50 Gy in five fractions to each lesion) on TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) were re-planned on Halcyon (6MV-FFF) using a similar arc geometry (except couch rotation), dose engine (AcurosXB algorithm), and treatment planning objectives. Rotational patient setup errors of [± 0.5⁰ to ± 3.0⁰] on Halcyon were simulated via Velocity registration software in all three rotation axes and recalculated dose distributions in Eclipse treatment planning system. Dosimetric impact of rotational errors was evaluated for target coverage and organs at risk (OAR). RESULTS Average PTV volume and distance to isocenter were 23.7 cc and 6.1 cm. Average change in Paddick's conformity indexes were less than -5%, -10%, and -15% for 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively for yaw, roll, and pitch rotation directions. Maximum drop off of PTV(D100%) coverage for 2° rotation was -2.0% (yaw), -2.2% (roll), and -2.5% (pitch). With ±1° rotational error, no PTV(D100%) loss was found. Due to anatomical complexity: irregular and highly variable tumor sizes and locations, highly heterogenous dose distribution, and steep dose gradient, no trend for loss of target(s) coverage as a function of distance to isocenter and PTV size was found. Change in maximum dose to OAR were acceptable per NRG-BR001 within ±1.0° rotation, but were up to 5 Gy higher to heart with 2° in the pitch rotation axis. CONCLUSION Our clinically realistic simulation results show that rotational patient setup errors up to 1.0° in any rotation axis could be acceptable for selected two separate lung lesions SBRT patients on Halcyon. Multivariable data analysis in large cohort is ongoing to fully characterize Halcyon RDS for synchronous SIMT lung SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Richard Mallory
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Mark E Bernard
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Mahesh Kudrimoti
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pokhrel D, Mallory R, Bernard ME. The spatial accuracy of ring-mounted halcyon linac versus C-arm TrueBeam linac for single-isocenter/multi-target SBRT treatment. Med Dosim 2023:S0958-3947(23)00026-2. [PMID: 37059628 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment of oligometastatic lesions via single-isocenter/multi-target (SIMT) plan is more efficient than using multi-isocenter/multitarget SBRT. This study quantifies the spatial positioning accuracy of 2 commercially available LINAC systems for SIMT treatment pertaining to the potential amplification of error as a function of the target's distance-to-isocenter. We compare the Ring-Gantry Halcyon LINAC equipped with the fast iterative conebeam-CT (iCBCT) for image-guided SIMT treatment, and the SBRT-dedicated C-Arm TrueBeam with standard pretreatment CBCT imaging. For both systems, Sun Nuclear's MultiMet Winston-Lutz Cube phantom with 6 metallic BBs distributed at different planes up to 7 cm away from the isocenter was used. The phantom was aligned and imaged via CBCT, and then couch corrections were applied. To treat all 6 BBs, an Eclipse 10-field 3D-conformal Field-in-Field (2×2 cm2 MLC field to each BB) plan for varying gantry, collimator, and couch (TrueBeam only) positions was developed for both machines with 6MV-FFF beam. The plan was delivered through ARIA once a week. The EPID images were analyzed via Sun Nuclear's software for spatial positioning accuracy. On TrueBeam, the treatment plan was delivered twice: once with 3DoF translational corrections and once with PerfectPitch 6DoF couch corrections. The average 3D spatial positioning accuracy was 0.55 ± 0.30 mm, 0.54 ± 0.24 mm, and 0.56 ± 0.28 mm at isocenter, and 0.59 ± 0.30 mm, 0.69 ± 0.30 mm, and 0.70 ± 0.35 mm at 7 cm distance-to-isocenter for Halcyon, TrueBeam 3DoF, and TrueBeam 6DoF, respectively. This suggests there are no clinically significant deviations of spatial uncertainty between the platforms with the distance-to-isocenter. On both platforms, our weekly independent measurements demonstrated the reproducibility for less than 1.0 mm positional accuracy of off-axis targets up to 7 cm from the isocenter. Due to this, no additional PTV-margin is suggested for lesions within 7 cm of isocenter. This study confirms that Halcyon can deliver similar positional accuracy to SBRT-dedicated TrueBeam to off-axis targets up to 7 cm from isocenter. These results further benchmark the spatial uncertainty of our extensively used SBRT-dedicated TrueBeam LINAC for SIMT SBRT treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
| | - Richard Mallory
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Mark E Bernard
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Visak J, Inam E, Meng B, Wang S, Parsons D, Nyugen D, Zhang T, Moon D, Avkshtol V, Jiang S, Sher D, Lin MH. Evaluating machine learning enhanced intelligent-optimization-engine (IOE) performance for ethos head-and-neck (HN) plan generation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023:e13950. [PMID: 36877668 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Varian Ethos utilizes novel intelligent-optimization-engine (IOE) designed to automate the planning. However, this introduced a black box approach to plan optimization and challenge for planners to improve plan quality. This study aims to evaluate machine-learning-guided initial reference plan generation approaches for head & neck (H&N) adaptive radiotherapy (ART). METHODS Twenty previously treated patients treated on C-arm/Ring-mounted were retroactively re-planned in the Ethos planning system using a fixed 18-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) template. Clinical goals for IOE input were generated using (1) in-house deep-learning 3D-dose predictor (AI-Guided) (2) commercial knowledge-based planning (KBP) model with universal RTOG-based population criteria (KBP-RTOG) and (3) an RTOG-based constraint template only (RTOG) for in-depth analysis of IOE sensitivity. Similar training data was utilized for both models. Plans were optimized until their respective criteria were achieved or DVH-estimation band was satisfied. Plans were normalized such that the highest PTV dose level received 95% coverage. Target coverage, high-impact organs-at-risk (OAR) and plan deliverability was assessed in comparison to clinical (benchmark) plans. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired two-tailed student t-test. RESULTS AI-guided plans were superior to both KBP-RTOG and RTOG-only plans with respect to clinical benchmark cases. Overall, OAR doses were comparable or improved with AI-guided plans versus benchmark, while they increased with KBP-RTOG and RTOG plans. However, all plans generally satisfied the RTOG criteria. Heterogeneity Index (HI) was on average <1.07 for all plans. Average modulation factor was 12.2 ± 1.9 (p = n.s), 13.1 ± 1.4 (p = <0.001), 11.5 ± 1.3 (p = n.s.) and 12.2 ± 1.9 for KBP-RTOG, AI-Guided, RTOG and benchmark plans, respectively. CONCLUSION AI-guided plans were the highest quality. Both KBP-enabled and RTOG-only plans are feasible approaches as clinics adopt ART workflows. Similar to constrained optimization, the IOE is sensitive to clinical input goals and we recommend comparable input to an institution's planning directive dosimetric criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Visak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Enobong Inam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Boyu Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Siqiu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dan Nyugen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Tingliang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dominic Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vladimir Avkshtol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - David Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Matsumoto K, Monzen H, Kubo K, Otsuka M, Nambu H, Nishimura Y. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Craniospinal Irradiation With a New O-ring Linac. Cureus 2023; 15:e36493. [PMID: 37090359 PMCID: PMC10118905 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to determine the feasibility of using a new O-ring linear accelerator (Halcyon, Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) to perform treatment planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). A 20-year-old male patient with leukemia was selected. The planning target volume (PTV) was contoured to include the entire contents of the brain and spinal canal. The PTV margin was 10 mm applied to the clinical target volume (CTV). VMAT (RapidArc, Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) planning was performed using four isocenter with five arcs, two full rotation arcs to cover the brain and upper part of the spinal cord, and one full rotation arc for the lower part of the spinal cord. The plan was created using the auto-feathering photon optimizer calculation of the planning system. The conformity index (CI) and heterogeneity index (HI) as well as dose-volume histograms of organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated. The patient position of ±3.0 mm in the craniocaudal direction was moved in to simulate the effect of treatment inaccuracy. The total treatment time was also measured. The CI and HI were 1.09 and 8.44, respectively. The mean dose (PTV) was 105.5%, and the mean dose (OARs) was lower than the planning dose constraints. Simulations with a patient position shift of ±3.0 mm resulted in an error of less than ±10.0% of the planned dose to the spinal cord. The total treatment time was within 15 minutes. VMAT planning for CSI with Halcyon achieved high conformality, uniform dose distribution, low dose to the surrounding normal tissues, and reduced treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Matsumoto
- Department of Radiology Service, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, JPN
| | - Hajime Monzen
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osaka, JPN
| | - Kazuki Kubo
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osaka, JPN
| | - Masakazu Otsuka
- Department of Radiology Service, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, JPN
| | - Hidekazu Nambu
- Department of Radiology Service, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, JPN
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sarkar B, Biswal SS, Shahid T, Ghosh T, Bhattacharya J, De A, Mukherjee M, Ganesh T, Cozzi L. Comparative dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy based craniospinal irradiation plans between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3430. [PMID: 36859485 PMCID: PMC9977918 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30429-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This study evaluates the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetric comparison between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam c-arm linear accelerators for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of the neuro-axis. 25 patients, who received treatment for medulloblastoma and primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors between 2018 and 2021, were planned for VMAT in True Beam (TB), and Halcyon (HAL) linear accelerators using 6 MV unflattened (FFF) photon beams (HALFFF and TBFFF). Dose-volume statistics for the target and organs at risk (OARs) and the total number of monitoring units (MUs) in the treatment plans were compared which included dose received by 95% PTV volume (V95%), volume receiving ≥ 107% dose, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (PI), MU and dose spillage (D10%, D30%, D50%, D70%, D90%). In all 26 OARs were considered of which five were serial and the remaining were parallel structures. For the former, the dose received by 0.2 cm3, volume = D0.2 cm3) were evaluated and for the latter mean dose were evaluated. Both arms were statistically compared with paired sample t-test with a significant value of ≤ 0.05. 11 patients received treatment with the Halcyon and the rest 14 in the TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator. Patients in the low- and intermediate-risk category (n = 13) received 23.4 Gy in 13 fractions. The remaining patients were in the high-risk category and received 35 Gy in 21 fractions or 36 Gy in 20 fractions. For HALFFF and TBFFF, PTVV95% were 97.5 ± 0.8% and 97.4 ± 0.9% respectively (p = 0.371) while the V107% were 0.6 ± 0.4% and 0.5 ± 0.5 respectively (p = 0.504). However, the number of monitoring units showed statistical significance (p < 0.001) with values of 1331.9 ± 243.4 MU and 1089 ± 206.7 MU respectively for the HAL and TB plans. The differences in spillage dose were also statistically significant, favouring HAL plans at D30% (p = 0.002), D50% (p < 0.001), D70% (p = 0.039), and D90% (p = 0.01) level except for D10% (p = 0.090). Conformity index also showed statistical significance with PI_HAL = 0.9 ± 0.02 and PI_TB = 0.89 ± 0.03 (p = 0.029). For 10 of the 21 parallel structures, the mean dose differences were statistically significant in favouring of HAL plans. Halcyon based VMAT CSI plans are dosimetrically superior in terms of organ dose, especially for the large organs, and offer lower spillage doses than the TrueBeam plans. Plans generated by both linear accelerators are suitable for the patients' treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biplab Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India.
| | | | - Tanweer Shahid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India
| | - Tanmoy Ghosh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India
| | - Jibak Bhattacharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India
| | - Arundhati De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India
| | - Mukti Mukherjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Luca Cozzi
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Rozzano Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy ,grid.423288.70000 0004 0413 1286Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hermida-López M, García-Relancio D, Comino-Muriano M, Pérez-Esteve B, Castillo-Elías E, Carrera-García Y, Giralt J. Treatment time of image-guided radiotherapy with a Halcyon 2.0 system. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:117-122. [PMID: 36535858 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment fraction time is a key indicator of the external beam radiotherapy process. The Halcyon system was designed to improve the clinical workflow, according to the manufacturer (Varian Medical Systems). Few works studied the actual delivery efficiency of the Halcyon system. This work analyzed the treatment time on a Halcyon 2.0 unit for a variety of sites along a period of 9 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment time included patient setup, image acquisition, image-guided online couch correction, and radiation delivery time. Data were extracted from the ARIA oncology information system and were studied as a function of the treatment site, the delivery modality, and the time from the first day of treatments with the Halcyon 2.0 system in our institution. RESULTS A total of 8599 fractions were delivered during the analyzed period (69.5% from VMAT plans, and 30.5% from IMRT plans). The number of fractions by site ranged from 30 for anal canal to 1933 for prostate. Five sites (prostate, lung, pelvis with prostate, breast, and gynecological sites) accounted for the 84% of the fractions. After a 2-week adaptation period of the staff, the daily mean treatment time was reduced to less than 12 min. The mean treatment time of all the fractions amounted to 10.5 ± 3.8 min. CONCLUSIONS The Halcyon 2.0 allowed delivering online image-guided radiation therapy in all fractions with total treatment time consistently below the 12-min standard time slot, for most of the analyzed treatment sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelino Hermida-López
- Servei de Fisica i Protecció Radiològica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - David García-Relancio
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina Comino-Muriano
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brenda Pérez-Esteve
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Castillo-Elías
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yolanda Carrera-García
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Giralt
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pogue JA, Cardenas CE, Cao Y, Popple RA, Soike M, Boggs DH, Stanley DN, Harms J. Leveraging intelligent optimization for automated, cardiac-sparing accelerated partial breast treatment planning. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1130119. [PMID: 36845685 PMCID: PMC9950631 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) yields similar rates of recurrence and cosmetic outcomes as compared to whole breast radiation therapy (RT) when patients and treatment techniques are appropriately selected. APBI combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising technique for precisely delivering high levels of radiation while avoiding uninvolved breast tissue. Here we investigate the feasibility of automatically generating high quality APBI plans in the Ethos adaptive workspace with a specific emphasis on sparing the heart. Methods Nine patients (10 target volumes) were utilized to iteratively tune an Ethos APBI planning template for automatic plan generation. Twenty patients previously treated on a TrueBeam Edge accelerator were then automatically replanned using this template without manual intervention or reoptimization. The unbiased validation cohort Ethos plans were benchmarked via adherence to planning objectives, a comparison of DVH and quality indices against the clinical Edge plans, and qualitative reviews by two board-certified radiation oncologists. Results 85% (17/20) of automated validation cohort plans met all planning objectives; three plans did not achieve the contralateral lung V1.5Gy objective, but all other objectives were achieved. Compared to the Eclipse generated plans, the proposed Ethos template generated plans with greater evaluation planning target volume (PTV_Eval) V100% coverage (p = 0.01), significantly decreased heart V1.5Gy (p< 0.001), and increased contralateral breast V5Gy, skin D0.01cc, and RTOG conformity index (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively). However, only the reduction in heart dose was significant after correcting for multiple testing. Physicist-selected plans were deemed clinically acceptable without modification for 75% and 90% of plans by physicians A and B, respectively. Physicians A and B scored at least one automatically generated plan as clinically acceptable for 100% and 95% of planning intents, respectively. Conclusions Standard left- and right-sided planning templates automatically generated APBI plans of comparable quality to manually generated plans treated on a stereotactic linear accelerator, with a significant reduction in heart dose compared to Eclipse generated plans. The methods presented in this work elucidate an approach for generating automated, cardiac-sparing APBI treatment plans for daily adaptive RT with high efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Yanan Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Richard A. Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Michael Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Drexell Hunter Boggs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Dennis N. Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Joseph Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhu H, Zhu Q, Wang Z, Yang B, Zhang W, Qiu J. Patient-specific quality assurance prediction models based on machine learning for novel dual-layered MLC linac. Med Phys 2023; 50:1205-1214. [PMID: 36342293 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is an indispensable and essential procedure in radiotherapy workflow, and several studies have been done to develop prediction models based on the conventional C-arm linac of single-layered multileaf collimator (MLC) with machine learning (ML) and deep learning techniques to predict PSQA results and improve efficiency. Recently, a newly designed O-ring gantry linac "Halcyon" equipped with unique jawless stacked-and-staggered dual-layered MLC was released. However, few studies have focused on developing PSQA prediction models for this novel dual-layered MLC system. PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of ML to predict PSQA results of fixed field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (FF-IMRT) plans for linac equipped with dual-layered MLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 213 FF-IMRT treatment plans, including 1383 beams from various treatment sites, were selected and delivered with portal dosimetry verification on Halcyon linac. Gamma analysis was performed using 1%/1, 2%/2, and 3%/2 mm criteria with a 10% threshold. The training set (TS) of ML models consisted of 1106 beams, and an independent evaluation set (ES) consisted of 277 beams. For each beam, 33 complexity metrics were extracted as input data for training models. Three ML algorithms (gradient boosting decision tree/GBDT, random forest/RF, and Poisson Lasso/PL) were utilized to build the models and predict gamma passing rates (GPRs). To improve the prediction accuracy in the rare region, a method of reweighting for TS has been performed and compared to the unweighted results. The importance of complexity metrics was studied by permuted interesting features. RESULTS The GBDT model had the best performance in this study. In ES, the minimal mean prediction error for unweighted results was 1.93%, 1.16%, 0.78% under 1%/1, 2%/2, and 3%/2 mm criteria, respectively, from GBDT model. Comparing to the unweighted results, the models after reweighting gained up to 30% improvement in the rare region, whereas the overall prediction error was slightly worse depending on the kind of models. For feature importance, 2 tree-based models (GBDT and RF) had in common the top 10 most important metrics as well as the same metric with the largest impact. CONCLUSION For linac equipped with novel dual-layered MLC, the ML model based on GBDT algorithm shows a certain degree of accuracy for GPRs prediction. The specific ML model for dual-layered MLC configuration could be a useful tool for physicists detecting PSQA measurement failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heling Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qizhen Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sun T, Lin X, Li K, Qiu Q, Duan J, Zhang G, Yin Y. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation: Planning comparison of Halcyon and C-arm accelerators. Front Oncol 2023; 13:993809. [PMID: 36959800 PMCID: PMC10028073 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.993809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetry of the Halcyon in prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hippocampal-sparing for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods Five VMAT plans were designed on CT images of 15 patients diagnosed with SCLC and received PCI. Three plans with two full arcs were generated on the Trilogy and the TrueBeam accelerators, and flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) modes were used on TrueBeam. Two Halcyon plans with two and three full arcs were generated, referred to as H-2A and H-3A, respectively. The prescription dose was 25 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions. The dose limit for hippocampus were D100 ≤ 9Gy and Dmax ≤ 16Gy. The Wilcoxon matched-paired signed-rank test was used to evaluate the significance of the observed differences between the five plans. Results H-2A plans significantly increased the D2 of PTV, and H-3A plans showed comparable or even better target dosimetry (better conformity) compared to the three plans on C-arm accelerators. Compared to T and TB plans, the two Halcyon plans significantly reduced the D100 and mean doses of bilateral hippocampus, the mean doses of eyeballs, and the maximum doses of lenses. D100 of hippocampus was reduced in TrueBeam plans comparing to Trilogy plans. The FFF plans on TrueBeam also represented advantages in Dmean and D100 of hippocampas, Dmean and Dmax of eyeballs, and the Dmax of lenses compared to FF plans. Halcyon plans and TrueBeam plans with FFF mode increased the MUs compared to FF plans. Comparing to H-2A, the H-3A plans exhibited additional dosimetric advantages, including D2, CI and HI of PTV, as well as the maximum and mean doses of hippocampus and eyeballs, and the maximum doses of optic nerves and brainstem. The two Halcyon plans significantly reduced the delivery time and showed the higher gamma passing rate than the three plans of C-arm accelerators. Conclusions Compared with the C-arm accelerators, the dose of hippocampus and the delivery times on Halcyon are relatively significantly reduced for hippocampal-sparing PCI. Three arcs are recommended for VMAT plans with the Halcyon in hippocampal-sparing PCI.
Collapse
|
20
|
Whelan B, Trovati S, Wang J, Fahrig R, Maxim PG, Hanuka A, Shumail M, Tantawi S, Merrick J, Perl J, Keall P, Loo BW. Bayesian optimization to design a novel x-ray shaping device. Med Phys 2022; 49:7623-7637. [PMID: 35904020 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In radiation therapy, x-ray dose must be precisely sculpted to the tumor, while simultaneously avoiding surrounding organs at risk. This requires modulation of x-ray intensity in space and/or time. Typically, this is achieved using a multi leaf collimator (MLC)-a complex mechatronic device comprising over one hundred individually powered tungsten 'leaves' that move in or out of the radiation field as required. Here, an all-electronic x-ray collimation concept with no moving parts is presented, termed "SPHINX": Scanning Pencil-beam High-speed Intensity-modulated X-ray source. SPHINX utilizes a spatially distributed bremsstrahlung target and collimator array in conjunction with magnetic scanning of a high energy electron beam to generate a plurality of small x-ray "beamlets." METHODS A simulation framework was developed in Topas Monte Carlo incorporating a phase space electron source, transport through user defined magnetic fields, bremsstrahlung x-ray production, transport through a SPHINX collimator, and dose in water. This framework was completely parametric, meaning a simulation could be built and run for any supplied geometric parameters. This functionality was coupled with Bayesian optimization to find the best parameter set based on an objective function which included terms to maximize dose rate for a user defined beamlet width while constraining inter-channel cross talk and electron contamination. Designs for beamlet widths of 5, 7, and 10 mm2 were generated. Each optimization was run for 300 iterations and took approximately 40 h on a 24-core computer. For the optimized 7-mm model, a simulation of all beamlets in water was carried out including a linear scanning magnet calibration simulation. Finally, a back-of-envelope dose rate formalism was developed and used to estimate dose rate under various conditions. RESULTS The optimized 5-, 7-, and 10-mm models had beamlet widths of 5.1 , 7.2 , and 10.1 mm2 and dose rates of 3574, 6351, and 10 015 Gy/C, respectively. The reduction in dose rate for smaller beamlet widths is a result of both increased collimation and source occlusion. For the simulation of all beamlets in water, the scanning magnet calibration reduced the offset between the collimator channels and beam centroids from 2.9 ±1.9 mm to 0.01 ±0.03 mm. A slight reduction in dose rate of approximately 2% per degree of scanning angle was observed. Based on a back-of-envelope dose rate formalism, SPHINX in conjunction with next-generation linear accelerators has the potential to achieve substantially higher dose rates than conventional MLC-based delivery, with delivery of an intensity modulated 100 × 100 mm2 field achievable in 0.9 to 10.6 s depending on the beamlet widths used. CONCLUSIONS Bayesian optimization was coupled with Monte Carlo modeling to generate SPHINX geometries for various beamlet widths. A complete Monte Carlo simulation for one of these designs was developed, including electron beam transport of all beamlets through scanning magnets, x-ray production and collimation, and dose in water. These results demonstrate that SPHINX is a promising candidate for sculpting radiation dose with no moving parts, and has the potential to vastly improve both the speed and robustness of radiotherapy delivery. A multi-beam SPHINX system may be a candidate for delivering magavoltage FLASH RT in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Whelan
- ACRF Image-X Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stefania Trovati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Jinghui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Rebecca Fahrig
- Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.,Department of Computer Science 5, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Adi Hanuka
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Muhammad Shumail
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Sami Tantawi
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Julian Merrick
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Joseph Perl
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Paul Keall
- ACRF Image-X Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kubo K, Tamura M, Matsumoto K, Otsuka M, Monzen H. Independent monitor unit verification for dynamic flattened beam plans on the Halcyon linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13807. [PMID: 36265085 PMCID: PMC9859998 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Independent monitor unit verification (MUV) methods for the dynamic beam-flattening (DBF) technique have not been established. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether MU values for the DBF technique can be calculated using in-air and in-water output ratios (Sc and Scp ). Sc and Scp were measured in the DBF mode, and the phantom scatter factor (Sp ) was calculated. The difference between calculated and planned MUs with square and rectangle fields and clinical plans for different treatment sites was also evaluated. Sc values for the 4 × 4 to 24 × 24 cm2 fields of the distal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) layer at 2-cm intervals were 0.887, 0.815, 0.715, 0.716, 0.611, 0.612, 0.511, 0.373, 0.374, 0.375, and 0.374, respectively. No collimator exchange effect was observed. Sc also depends slightly on the field size of the distal MLC layer. If the distal-MLC-layered field size was less than 20% of the corresponding MLC sequence size in the proximal MLC layer, Sc was affected by >1%, which was compensated using a correction factor (CF). Sp increased as the field sizes of the MLC sequence and distal MLC leaves increased. MUs calculated using measured Sc , Sp , and CF for square and rectangle fields agreed with planned MUs within ±1.2%. A larger difference (-1.5%) between calculated and planned MUs was observed for clinical plans, whereas differences in MUs were within 2 MU for most fields (56 out of 64 fields). MU calculation for the DBF technique can be performed with Sc , Sp , and CF for independent MUV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuki Kubo
- Department of Medical PhysicsGraduate School of Medical SciencesKindai UniversityOsaka‐sayamaOsakaJapan
| | - Mikoto Tamura
- Department of Medical PhysicsGraduate School of Medical SciencesKindai UniversityOsaka‐sayamaOsakaJapan
| | - Kenji Matsumoto
- Department of Radiology CenterKindai University HospitalOsaka‐sayamaOsakaJapan
| | - Masakazu Otsuka
- Department of Radiology CenterKindai University HospitalOsaka‐sayamaOsakaJapan
| | - Hajime Monzen
- Department of Medical PhysicsGraduate School of Medical SciencesKindai UniversityOsaka‐sayamaOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ju SG, Ahn YC, Kim YB, Kim JM, Kwon DY, Park BS, Yang K. Dosimetric comparison between VMAT plans using the fast-rotating O-ring linac with dual-layer stacked MLC and helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:155. [PMID: 36096874 PMCID: PMC9465858 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02124-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the dosimetric profiles of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using the fast-rotating O-ring linac (the Halcyon system) based on a dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator and helical tomotherapy (HT) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa). METHODS For 30 NPCa patients, three sets of RT plans were generated, under the same policy of contouring and dose constraints: HT plan; Halcyon VMAT plan with two arcs (HL2arc); and Halcyon VMAT plan with four arcs (HL4arc), respectively. The intended dose schedule was to deliver 67.2 Gy to the planning gross target volume (P-GTV) and 56.0 Gy to the planning clinical target volume (P-CTV) in 28 fractions using the simultaneously integrated boost concept. Target volumes and organ at risks dose metrics were evaluated for all plans. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for esophagus, parotid glands, spinal cord, and brain stem were compared. RESULTS The HT plan achieved the best dose homogeneity index for both P_GTV and P_CTV, followed by the HL4arc and L2arc plans. No significant difference in the dose conformity index (CI) for P_GTV was observed between the HT plan (0.80) and either the HL2arc plan (0.79) or the HL4arc plan (0.83). The HL4arc plan showed the best CI for P_CTV (0.88), followed by the HL2arc plan (0.83) and the HT plan (0.80). The HL4arc plan (median, interquartile rage (Q1, Q3): 25.36 (22.22, 26.89) Gy) showed the lowest Dmean in the parotid glands, followed by the HT (25.88 (23.87, 27.87) Gy) and HL2arc plans (28.00 (23.24, 33.99) Gy). In the oral cavity (OC) dose comparison, the HT (22.03 (19.79, 24.85) Gy) plan showed the lowest Dmean compared to the HL2arc (23.96 (20.84, 28.02) Gy) and HL4arc (24.14 (20.17, 27.53) Gy) plans. Intermediate and low dose regions (40-65% of the prescribed dose) were well fit to the target volume in HL4arc, compared to the HT and HL2arc plans. All plans met the dose constraints for the other OARs with sufficient dose margins. The between-group differences in the median NTCP values for the parotid glands and OC were < 3.47% and < 1.7% points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric profiles of Halcyon VMAT plans were comparable to that of HT, and HL4arc showed better dosimetric profiles than HL2arc for NPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Gyu Ju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yeong-Bi Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Man Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Yeol Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Byoung Suk Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Irwon-Ro 81, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Azorín JFP, Saez J, Garcia LIR, Hernandez V. Investigation on the impact of the leaf trailing effect using the Halcyon integrated platform system. Med Phys 2022; 49:6161-6170. [PMID: 35770385 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The double-stacked design of the Halcyon multileaf collimator (MLC) presents new challenges for treatment planning systems (TPSs). The leaf trailing effect has recently been described as the result of the interplay between the fluence transmitted through the leaf tip ends of each MLC layer. This effect makes the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) dependent on the distance between the leaves of different layers (trailing distance) and is not adequately modeled by the Eclipse TPS. The purpose of our study was to investigate and report the dose discrepancies produced by these limitations in clinical plans and to explore how these discrepancies can be mitigated and avoided. METHODS The integrated platform with the Halcyon v2 system, Eclipse and Aria v15.6, was used. The dose discrepancies were obtained with EPID images and the portal dosimetry software and validated using radiochromic film dosimetry. The results for the AIDA commissioning test and for nine selected clinical beams with the sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) technique were thoroughly analyzed and presented. First, the DICOM RT plans were exported and the fluences were computed using different leaf tip models, and then were compared. Second, the detailed characteristics of the corresponding leaf sequences were investigated. Finally, modified DICOM RT plans were created in which the non-collimating (backup) leaves were retracted 2 mm to increase the leaf trailing distance, the modified plans were imported back into the TPS and the measurements were repeated. Dedicated in-house tools were developed in Python to carry out all analyses. RESULTS Dose discrepancies greater than 10% and regions of gamma failure were found in both the AIDA test and clinical beams using static-gantry dIMRT. Fluence analysis highlighted that the discrepancies were due to limitations in the MLC model implemented in the TPS. Analysis of leaf sequences indicated that regions of failure were associated with very low leaf speeds and virtually motionless leaves within the beam aperture. Some of these discrepancies were mitigated by increasing the trailing distance of the non-collimating leaves without affecting the beam aperture, but this strategy was not possible in regions where the leaves from both layers actively defined the beam aperture. CONCLUSIONS Current limitations of the MLC model in Eclipse produced discrepancies between calculated and delivered doses in clinical beams that caused plan-specific quality assurance failures and interruptions in the clinical workflow. Careful evaluation of the clinical plans produced by Eclipse for the Halcyon is recommended, especially for static gantry dIMRT treatments. Some characteristics of leaf sequences are problematic and should be avoided in clinical plans and, in general, a better leaf tip model is needed. This is particularly important in adaptive radiotherapy treatments, where the accuracy and reliability of TPS dose calculations are of the utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Fernando Pérez Azorín
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Gurutzeta-Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, E-48903, Spain.,Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, E-48903, Spain
| | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08036, Spain
| | - Luis Isaac Ramos Garcia
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, E-31008, Spain
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, Tarragona, 43204, Spain.,Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evaluation of an automated template-based treatment planning system for radiotherapy of anal, rectal and prostate cancer. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:30-36. [PMID: 35464888 PMCID: PMC9020095 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Automated treatment planning system compared to manual planning. Equivalent plan quality between VMAT manually generated- and IMRT automatically generated plans. Evaluation of anal, prostate and rectum treatment plans. Generation of highly consistent IMRT automated plan within 2 to 3.5 min.
Background and purpose The Ethos system has enabled online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) by implementing an automated treatment planning system (aTPS) for both intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plan creation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of aTPS plans in the pelvic region. Material and Methods Sixty patients with anal (n = 20), rectal (n = 20) or prostate (n = 20) cancer were retrospectively re-planned with the aTPS. Three IMRT (7-, 9- and 12-field) and two VMAT (2 and 3 arc) automatically generated plans (APs) were created per patient. The duration of the automated plan generation was registered. The best IMRT-AP and VMAT-AP for each patient were selected based on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs). The AP quality was analyzed and compared to corresponding clinically accepted and manually generated VMAT plans (MPs) using several clinically relevant dose metrics. Calculation-based pre-treatment plan quality assurance (QA) was performed for all plans. Results The median total duration to generate the five APs with the aTPS was 55 min, 39 min and 35 min for anal, prostate and rectal plans, respectively. The target coverage and the OAR sparing were equivalent for IMRT-APs and VMAT-MPs, while VMAT-Aps. demonstrated lower target dose homogeneity and higher dose to some OARs. Both conformity and homogeneity index were equivalent (rectal) or better (anal and prostate) for IMRT-APs compared to VMAT-MPs. All plans passed the patient-specific QA tolerance limit. Conclusions The aTPS generates plans comparable to MPs within a short time-frame which is highly relevant for oART treatments.
Collapse
Key Words
- AP, automatically generated plan
- Automated treatment planning
- CN, conformity number
- CT, computed tomography
- CTV, clinical target volume
- DVH, dose volume histogram
- FFF, flattening filter free
- GTV, gross tumor volume
- HI, homogeneity index
- IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy
- Intelligent optimization engine
- KPB, knowledge-based planning
- Linac, Linear accelerators
- MCO, multi-criteria optimization
- MLC, multileaf collimator
- MP, manually-generated plan
- MR, magnetic resonance
- MU, Monitor Unit
- OAR, Organ at risk
- Online adaptive radiotherapy
- PTV, planning target volume
- Pelvic cancer
- Plan quality
- QA, Quality assurance
- SD, standard deviation
- Template-based Ethos TPS
- VMAT, volumetric arc radiotherapy
- aTPS, automated treatment planning system
- oART, online adaptive radiotherapy
Collapse
|
25
|
Tsai YC, Wang CC, Wang CW, Liang HK, Wang SF, Wu CJ, Lin CS. Efficient method for whole-breast irradiation therapy using Halcyon linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13635. [PMID: 35587264 PMCID: PMC9278690 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Halcyon is a linear accelerator‐based treatment machine designed for a high‐throughput simplified workflow. The machine features a compact jawless design, dual‐layer multileaf collimators, and a single 6‐MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) beam. However, the machine's 6‐MV FFF beam may restrict its applicability to conventional techniques, such as field‐in‐field (FiF) radiotherapy, for breast cancer treatment. This study developed a practical and efficient hybrid method for imaging, planning, and irradiation procedures for whole‐breast irradiation using Halcyon linear accelerators. Materials and methods The proposed method involves five major steps: (1) field arrangement, (2) planning target volume (PTV) generation and evaluation, (3) basal plan generation, (4) inverse planning intensity–modulated radiation therapy plan generation, and (5) plan evaluation and irradiation. The PTV is generated using isodose curves plotted on the basis of tangential fields, which are applied to create a basal plan. Subsequently, a basal‐dose‐compensation approach is applied to further optimize the treatment plan. This efficient workflow necessitates executing only one onboard cone‐beam computed tomography procedure. This study included 10 patients with early‐stage breast cancer who were treated at our center. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated by comparing its corresponding irradiation time and dose statistics with those derived for a dynamically flattened beam‐based FiF (DFB‐FiF) method. Results All plans were normalized to ensure that 98% of the prescribed dose covered 95% of the PTV. On average, the global maximum doses in the proposed and DFB‐FiF methods were lower than 106%. The homogeneity index for right‐sided (left‐sided) breast cancer was 0.053 (0.056) in the proposed method and 0.073 (0.076) in the DFB‐FiF method. The dose statistics of normal tissues, including the contralateral breast, heart, and lungs, were comparable between the methods. However, the irradiation time per monitor unit in the proposed method was approximately five times faster than that in the DFB‐FiF method, but the planning time and complexity were similar between the methods. Conclusions This study developed and evaluated an efficient and practical hybrid method for whole‐breast irradiation using the Halcyon. This method can significantly reduce the irradiation time, while providing comparable dose statistics to the DFB‐FiF method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chun Tsai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Wei Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Kung Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Fan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Jung Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Shiun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rachi T, Parshuram RV, Tanaka Y, Togo H. Examination of conversion method of dose distribution of lung cancer IMRT using fluence reversible calculation function in O-ring type linac and C-type linac. Phys Eng Sci Med 2022; 45:559-567. [PMID: 35438453 PMCID: PMC9239951 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01122-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Generally, converting irradiation plans between C-arm linacs (C-linac) when the linac fails is possible without recalculating the dose distribution using a treatment planning system (TPS), because they have similar mechanical structure. However, the O-ring-type linac (O-linac) differs from the C-linac in forming the dose distribution. Therefore, if O-linac breaks down, it is necessary to formulate a treatment plan from scratch. In this study, we investigated a method for converting irradiation from an O-linac to a C-linac. Thirty patients with lung cancer who underwent volumetric-modulated arc therapy with an O-linac were included in this study. The O-linac dose distribution was converted into energy fluence by the function of the TPS. The alternative linac multi-leaf collimator (MLC) was then optimized to achieve energy fluence. The homogeneity index, conformity index, and planning treatment volume (D95%, D2%) of the converted plan were compared with the original plan. For organ at risk (OAR), the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the lung, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were evaluated. Additionally, the shapes of the isodose curves were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). There was no significant difference between the target and OARs (p > 0.05). The mean DSCs of 30% to 100% isodose curves of the prescribed dose and the isodose ≥ 105% and ≤ 20%were > 0.8 and < 0.8, respectively. Due to the structural differences of MLC, the dose-volume and generation positions were different in the dose range of ≥ 105% and ≤ 20%; hence, DSCs decreased. However, no statistically significant difference in the DVH was identified for either treatment plan. Based on this result, we propose a simple replanning method for performing MLC fitting after converting the dose to the energy fluence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiya Rachi
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| | - Raturi Vijay Parshuram
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
- Course of Advance Clinical Research of Cancer, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Bunkyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Tanaka
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Haruki Togo
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pokhrel D, Webster A, Mallory R, Visak J, Bernard ME, McGarry RC, Kudrimoti M. Feasibility of using ring‐mounted Halcyon Linac for single‐isocenter/two‐lesion lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13555. [PMID: 35128795 PMCID: PMC9121043 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Aaron Webster
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Richard Mallory
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Justin Visak
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Mark E. Bernard
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Ronald C. McGarry
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Mahesh Kudrimoti
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Allali S, Servois V, Beddok A, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Can we treat with radiation breast cancer patients with covid-19 infection? Results from a prospective study. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:577-584. [PMID: 35165016 PMCID: PMC8813549 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-Cov-2) is at the origin of a global pandemic. This pandemic has prompted the current health system to reorganize and rethink the care offered by health establishments. We report the early and late toxicity in patients infected with covid-19 treated at the same time for early-stage breast cancer. Material and methods This is a monocentric prospective study of patients treated in our hospital between March and June 2020 who were diagnosed with covid-19 infection. The inclusion criteria were to be irradiated for early-stage breast cancer and to have a positive covid diagnosis on a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and/or a lung computed tomography (CT) scan and/or suggestive clinical symptoms. All of them needed 6 months follow-up clinic after the end of the radiotherapy with clinical examination, mammogram, as well as CT scan to evaluate the lung status. Radiotherapy consisted of breast or chest wall irradiation with or without lymph node irradiation, with protocols adapted to pandemic situation. The treatment-related toxicity was graded according to the Common Toxicology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Results All 350 patients treated for early-stage breast cancer were studied. Of them, 16 presented clinical symptoms of covid-19 infection, and of them 12 had clinical, CT scan and PCR confirmation. This entire cohort of 12 patients with median age of 56 years (range: 42–72 years) underwent their radiotherapy. During the radiotherapy, nine patients presented radiodermatitis: eight grade 1 (66%) and one grade 2 (8%). Two patients with lymph nodes irradiation presented grade 2 oesophagitis. Late toxicity was evaluated 6 months after the end of the radiotherapy, and there was no radiation or covid lung sequel on the CT scans. One patient presented covid-related dyspnoea, and two had fibrosis. Conclusion The half-year follow-up of prospective covid-19 cohort, treated for early-stage breast cancer demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with few low-grade adverse events. It seems that the covid-19 infection does not appear to increase the side effects of radiotherapy. Therefore radiotherapy should not be delayed.
Collapse
|
29
|
Miyasaka R, Cho S, Hiraoka T, Chiba K, Kawachi T, Katayose T, Suda Y, Hara R. Investigation of Halcyon multi-leaf collimator model in Eclipse treatment planning system: A focus on the VMAT dose calculation with the Acuros XB algorithm. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13519. [PMID: 35001518 PMCID: PMC8906209 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The dual‐layer multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) in Halcyon involves further complexities in the dose calculation process, because the leaf‐tip transmission varies according to the leaf trailing pattern. For the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment, the prescribed dose for the target volume can be sensitive to the leaf‐tip transmission change. This report evaluates the dosimetric consequence due to the uncertainty of the dual‐layer MLC model in Eclipse through the dose verifications for clinical VMAT. Additionally, the Halcyon leaf‐tip model is empirically adjusted for the VMAT dose calculation with the Acuros XB. Materials and methods For this evaluation, an in‐house program that analyzes the leaf position in each layer was developed. Thirty‐two clinical VMAT plans were edited into three leaf sequences: dual layer (original), proximal single layer, or distal single layer. All leaf sequences were verified using Delta4 according to the dose difference (DD) and the global gamma index (GI). To improve the VMAT dose calculation accuracy, the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was adjusted to minimize the DD in single‐layer leaf sequences. Results The mean of DD were −1.35%, −1.20%, and −1.34% in the dual‐layer, proximal single‐layer, and distal single‐layer leaf sequences, respectively. The changes in the mean of DD between leaf sequences were within 0.2%. However, the calculated doses differed from the measured doses by approximately 1% in all leaf sequences. The tuned DLG was increased by 0.8 mm from the original DLG in Eclipse. When the tuned DLG was used in the dose calculation, the mean of DD neared 0% and GI with a criterion of 2%/2 mm yielded a pass rate of more than 98%. Conclusion No significant change was confirmed in the dose calculation accuracy between the leaf sequences. Therefore, it is suggested that the dosimetric consequence due to the leaf trailing was negligibly small in clinical VMAT plans. The DLG tuning for Halcyon can be useful for reducing the dose calculation uncertainties in Eclipse VMAT and required in the commissioning for Acuros XB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Miyasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - SangYong Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kohei Chiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toru Kawachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsurou Katayose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuhi Suda
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Hara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zheng J, Xia Y, Sun L. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Application of the Halcyon(2.0) IMRT Technique in Long-Course Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221074501. [PMID: 35235486 PMCID: PMC8894964 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221074501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate if the Halcyon(2.0) Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy (IMRT) technique has an advantage in the long-course rectal cancer radiotherapy. Methods: A total of 20 clinical IMRT plans of Halcyon(2.0) for long-course (2Gy in 25 fractions) rectal cancer radiotherapy were randomly selected. Based on the parameters of these plans, 20 TrueBeam (with the Millennium 120 MLC) plans were redesigned, respectively. The dosimetry indexes, field complexity parameters, the Gamma Passing Rates (GPR), and the delivery time of the 2 groups of plans were obtained as measures of the plan quality, the modulation complexity, the delivery accuracy, and the delivery efficiency. The differences between the 2 groups of parameters were analyzed, with P < .05 means statistically significant. Results: In terms of dosimetry, there was no significant or clinical difference between the 2 groups in critical dosimetry parameters. The Monitor Unit of the Halcyon(2.0) fields is lower than the TrueBeam fields by 26.39, while the modulation complexity score (MCS), the mean aperture area variability (AAV), and the mean leaf sequence variability (LSV) of the Halcyon(2.0) fields were 23.8%, 20%, and 2.3% larger than those of the TrueBeam fields, respectively. Neither the ArcCheck-based GPRs nor the portal-dosimetry-based GPRs in both 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria showed the difference between the Halcyon(2.0) fields and the TrueBeam fields. The Pearson correlation coefficient between GPR(2%/2 mm) and MCS of the Halcyon(2.0) fields was 0.335, while that of the TrueBeam fields was 0.502. The mean total delivery time of the TrueBeam plans was 195.55 ± 22.86 s, while that of Halcyon(2.0) was 124.25 ± 10.42 s (P < .001), which was reduced approximatively by 36%. Conclusion: For long-course rectal cancer radiotherapy, the Halcyon(2.0) IMRT plans behave almost the same in dosimetry and delivery accuracy as the TrueBeam plans. However, the lower MU and the field modulation complexity, combined with the higher delivery efficiency, make Halcyon(2.0) a feasible and reliable platform in long-course radiotherapy for the rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajun Zheng
- 26481Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuqing Xia
- 26481Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Li Sun
- 26481Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morrow A, Trisnadi N, Chung H. Multi-level multi-leaf collimators: optimization of layer thicknesses and a feasibility study. Med Phys 2021; 49:792-800. [PMID: 34958149 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The function of multi-leaf collimators (MLC) is to modulate and shape the intensity of a radiotherapy beam by either blocking or unblocking beamlets. A variation on this functionality is tested in this work wherein the MLC is split into layers, with each layer attenuating the beam by a different amount. In this design, full blocking of a beamlet occurs only if all layers are blocked. This work suggests that such a device, a multi-layer MLC (MLMLC), can deliver dose distributions like a single layer MLC can deliver while requiring less time and monitor units (MU) . METHODS Optimal fluences were made for prostate plans using the Eclipse v13.6. An algorithm was developed to create step-and-shoot MLMLC patterns to match these optimal fluences when using up to six layers of MLC. Twelve MLMLC plans were made in total. These patterns were imported back into Eclipse as equivalent tungsten compensators and doses were calculated. Dose volume histogram (DVH) values, total monitor units (MU), and total time to deliver were compared between arc-style MLMLC plans and nine-field step and shoot IMRT plans created completely in Eclipse using a single layer MLC . RESULTS When using three or more layers, specified DVH values between the two sets agreed to within 5% while requiring roughly half as much time to deliver and about 20% fewer MU . CONCLUSIONS Demonstrated that having multi-layer MLC can deliver dose distributions like a single layer MLC with less time and monitor units. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Morrow
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Temple, TX, USA
| | | | - Heeteak Chung
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Temple, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Li F, Park J, Lalonde R, Jang SY, diMayorca MS, Flickinger JC, Keller A, Huq MS. Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 23:e13458. [PMID: 34845817 PMCID: PMC8803290 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Halcyon linear accelerators employ intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques. The Halcyon offers translational, but not rotational, couch correction, which only allows a 3 degrees of freedom (3‐DOF) correction. In contrast, the TrueBeam (TB) linear accelerator offers full 6‐DOF corrections. This study aims to evaluate the difference in treatment plan quality for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT between the Halcyon and TB linear accelerators. In addition, this study will also investigate the effect of patient rotational setup errors on the final plan quality. Methods We analyzed 20 patients with a single‐level spine metastasis located between the T7 and L5 vertebrae near the spinal canal. The median planning target volume was 52.0 cm3 (17.9–138.7 cm3). The median tumor diameter in the axial plane was 4.6 cm (range 1.7–6.8 cm), in the sagittal plane was 3.3 cm (range 2–5 cm). The prescription doses were either 12–16 Gy in 1 fraction or 18–24 Gy in 3 fractions. All patients were treated on the TB linear accelerator with a 2.5 mm Multi‐Leaf Collimator (MLC) leaf width. Treatment plans were retrospectively created for the Halcyon, which has a 5 mm effective MLC leaf width. The 20 patients had a total of 50 treatments. Analysis of the 50 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans showed average rotational setup errors of 0.6°, 1.2°, and 0.8° in pitch, yaw, and roll, respectively. Rotational error in roll was not considered in this study, as the original TB plans used a coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, and each 1° of roll will contribute an error of 1/360. If a plan has 3 arcs, the contribution from errors in roll will be < 0.1%. To simulate different patient setup errors, for each patient, 12 CT image datasets were generated in Velocity AI with different rotational combinations at a pitch and yaw of 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. We recalculated both the TB and Halcyon plans on these rotated images. The dosimetric plan quality was evaluated based on the percent tumor coverage, the Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), Homogeneity index (HI), the maximum dose to the cord/cauda, and the volume of the cord/cauda receiving 8, 10, and 12 Gy (V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy). Paired t‐tests were performed between the original and rotated plans with a significance level of 0.05. Results The Eclipse based VMAT plans on Halcyon achieved a similar target coverage (92.3 ± 3.0% vs. 92.4 ± 3.3%, p = 0.82) and CI (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2, p = 0.12) compared to the TB plans. The Gradient index of Halcyon is higher (3.96 ±0.8) than TB (3.85 ±0.7), but not statistically significant. The maximum dose to the spinal cord/cauda was comparable (11.1 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 11.4 ± 3.6 Gy, p = 0.39), as were the V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy to the cord/cauda. The dosimetric influence of patient rotational setup error was statistically insignificant for rotations of up to 1° pitch/yaw (with similar target coverage, CI, max cord/cauda dose and V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy for cord/cauda). The total number of monitor units (MUs) for Halcyon (4998 ± 1688) was comparable to that of TB (5463 ± 2155) (p = 0.09). Conclusions The Halcyon VMAT plans for a single thoracic or lumbar spine metastasis were dosimetrically comparable to the TB plans. Patient rotation within 1° in the pitch and yaw directions, if corrected by translation, resulted in insignificant dosimetric effects. The Halcyon linear accelerator is an acceptable alternative to TB for the treatment of single thoracic or lumbar spinal level metastasis, but users need to be cautious about the patient rotational setup error. It is advisable to select patients appropriately, including only those with the thoracic or lumbar spine involvement and keeping at least 2 mm separation between the target and the cord/cauda. More margin is needed if the distance between the isocenter and cord/cauda is larger. It is advisable to place the planning isocenter close to the spinal canal to further mitigate the rotational error. Summary We simulated various scenarios of patient setup errors with different rotational combinations of pitch and yaw with 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. Rotation was corrected with translation only to mimic the Halcyon treatment scenario. Using the Halcyon for treating a tumor in a single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment is feasible, but caution should be noted in patients requiring rotational corrections of > 1° in the absence of 6‐DOF correction capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeonghoon Park
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Basking Ridge, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ron Lalonde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Si Young Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - John C Flickinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew Keller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammed Saiful Huq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Caravani K, Murry R, Healy B. Characterisation of in-room leakage and scattered radiation for the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 45:73-81. [PMID: 34797532 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01084-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Unintended sources of secondary radiation resulting from photon beams in linear accelerators are patient scatter, collimator scatter, scatter from surfaces within the bunker, and head leakage. This work characterises the in-room leakage and scattered radiation for the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator. Scattered and leakage radiation for static gantry angles 0°, 45°, and 90° and largest field size 28 × 28 cm2 were measured with an ionisation chamber survey meter at a radial distance of 1.5 m from the isocentre. The scatter within the treatment room was characterised with isocontour maps from measurements of 360° arc deliveries with the largest field size 28 × 28 cm2 at various heights and distances from the isocentre. The transmission through the primary beam stopper was measured with a Farmer ionisation chamber. For static gantry angles, instantaneous dose rate readings were typically around 70 mSv/hr at 1.5 m from the isocentre with lower dose rates at room angles adjacent to the gantry. The head leakage was measured as less than 0.03% of the useful beam. In a full 360° arc, the radiation dose around the Halcyon was coldest in lateral areas, with hotter areas behind and in front of the gantry. The primary beam stopper transmission was measured as 0.019%, reducing the requirement of primary barriers in the shielding design by a factor of 1/500. The results presented in this study can be used to determine the out-of-field dose to patients and to inform bunker shielding designs for Halcyon linear accelerators.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ju E, Heo EJ, Park CG, Kim M, Kim KH, Shim JB, Park YJ, Lee NK, Kim CY, Lee S. Dosimetric comparison of VitalBeam ® and Halcyon TM 2.0 for hypofractionated VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost treatment of early-stage left-sided breast cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:232-238. [PMID: 34554605 PMCID: PMC8504599 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study compared the quality of treatment plans for early‐stage, left‐sided breast cancer, as planned for and delivered by the HalcyonTM and VitalBeam®. Materials and methods Fifteen patients diagnosed with early‐stage left‐sided breast cancer, who had received VMAT with hypofractionated SIB, were recruited. All cases were planned using HalcyonTM comprising a dual‐layer MLC (DL‐MLC) and VitalBeam® with a Millennium 120 MLC (VB‐MLC). For the PTVs, the quality of coverage (QC), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) were calculated for each plan. The dosimetric differences between the two treatment plans were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test (p < 0.05). To evaluate delivery efficiency, the average delivery time for each patient's treatment plan was recorded and compared. Results For the PTVs, the two plans (DL‐MLC and VB‐MLC) were comparable in terms of the QC, CI, and HI. However, V30Gy and Dmean for the heart in the DL‐MLC plan were significantly reduced by 0.49% and 14.6%, respectively, compared with those in the VB‐MLC plan (p < 0.05). The Dmean value for the ipsilateral lung in the DL‐MLC plan significantly decreased by 5.5%, compared with that in the VB‐MLC plan (p < 0.05). In addition, the delivery times for the DL‐MLC and VB‐MLC plans were 79 ± 10 and 101 ± 11 s, respectively. Conclusions DL‐MLC plans were found to improve OAR sparing. In particular, when treating left‐sided breast cancer via DL‐MLC plans, the risk of heart toxicity is expected to be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunbin Ju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Bio-Medical Science, Graduate School of Korea University, Sejong, Korea
| | - Eun Jeong Heo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Bio-Medical Science, Graduate School of Korea University, Sejong, Korea
| | - Chun Gun Park
- Department of Mathematics, Kyonggi University, Gyeonggi, Korea
| | - Minseok Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Yonsei University Graduate school, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyeon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jang Bo Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Je Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam Kwon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Yong Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Dewit B, Draulans C, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Automated treatment planning of prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with focal boosting on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: Plan quality comparison with C-arm linacs. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:59-72. [PMID: 34318996 PMCID: PMC8425873 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The integration of auto‐segmentation and automated treatment planning methods on a fast‐rotating O‐ring linac may improve the time efficiency of online adaptive radiotherapy workflows. This study investigates whether automated treatment planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the O‐ring linac could generate plans that are of similar quality as those obtained through manual planning on clinical C‐arm linacs. Methods For 20 men with prostate cancer, reference treatment plans were generated on a TrueBeam STx C‐arm linac with HD120 MLC and a TrueBeam C‐arm linac with Millennium 120 MLC using 6 MV flattened dual arc VMAT. Manual planning on the Halcyon fast‐rotating O‐ring linac was performed using 6 MV FFF dual arc VMAT (HA2‐DL10) and triple arc VMAT (HA3‐DL10) to investigate the performance of the dual‐layer MLC system. Automated planning was performed for triple arc VMAT on the Halcyon linac (ET3‐DL10) using the automated planning algorithms of Ethos Treatment Planning. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate and 30 Gy to the seminal vesicles in five fractions. The iso‐toxic focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor nodule(s) was aimed to receive up to 50 Gy. Plan deliverability was verified using portal image dosimetry measurements. Results Compared to the C‐arm linacs, ET3‐DL10 shows increased seminal vesicles PTV coverage (D99%) and reduced high‐dose spillage to the bladder (V37Gy) and urethra (D0.035cc) but this came at the cost of increased high‐dose spillage to the rectum (V38Gy) and a higher intermediate dose spillage (D2cm). No statistically significant differences were found when benchmarking HA2‐DL10 and HA3‐DL10 with the C‐arm linacs. All plans passed the patient‐specific QA tolerance limit. Conclusions Automated planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the fast‐rotating O‐ring linac is feasible and achieves similar plan quality as those obtained on clinical C‐arm linacs using manual planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Dewit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hoisak JD, Kim GYG, Atwood TF, Pawlicki T. Operational Insights From the Longitudinal Analysis of a Linear Accelerator Machine Log. Cureus 2021; 13:e16038. [PMID: 34239800 PMCID: PMC8245652 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to perform a longitudinal analysis of linear accelerator (linac) technical faults reported with a cloud-based Machine Log system in use in a busy academic clinic and derive operational insights related to linac reliability, clinical utilization, and performance. Methods We queried the Machine Log system for the following parameters: linac type, number of reported technical faults, types of fault, number of faults where the linac was disabled, and estimated clinical downtime. The number of fractions treated and monitor units (MU) delivered were obtained from the record and verify system as metrics of linac utilization and to normalize the number of reported linac faults, facilitating inter-comparison. Two Varian TrueBeam C-arm linacs (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), one Varian 21iX C-arm linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), and one newly installed Varian Halcyon ring gantry linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) were evaluated. The linacs were studied over a 30-month period from September 2017 to March 2020. Results Over 30 months, comprising 677 clinical days, 1234 faults were reported from all linacs, including 153 “linac down” events requiring rescheduling or cancellation of treatments. The TrueBeam linacs reported nearly twice as many imaging, multileaf collimator (MLC), and beam generation faults per fraction, and MU as the Halcyon. Halcyon experienced fewer beam generation/steering, accessory, and cooling-related faults than the other linacs but reported more computer and networking issues. Although it employs a relatively new MLC design compared to the C-arm linacs and delivers primarily intensity-modulated treatments, Halcyon reported fewer MLC faults than the other linacs. The 21iX linac had the fewest software-related faults but was subject to the most cooling-related faults, which we attributed to extensive use of this linac for treatment techniques with extended beam-on times. Conclusions A longitudinal analysis of a cloud-based Machine Log system yielded operational insights into the utilization, performance, and technical reliability of the linacs in use at our institution. Several trends in linac sub-system reliability were identified and could be attributed to either age, design, clinical use, or operational demands. The results of this analysis will be used as a basis for designing linac quality assurance schedules that reflect actual linac usage and observed sub-system reliability. Such a practice may contribute to a clinic workflow subject to fewer disruptions from linac faults, ultimately improving efficiency and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy D Hoisak
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| | - Gwe-Ya G Kim
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| | - Todd F Atwood
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| | - Todd Pawlicki
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pokhrel D, Webster A, Stephen J, St Clair W. SBRT treatment of abdominal and pelvic oligometastatic lymph nodes using ring-mounted Halcyon Linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:162-171. [PMID: 34032367 PMCID: PMC8200515 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES This work seeks to evaluate the plan quality, treatment delivery efficiency, and accuracy of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of abdominal/pelvic oligometastatic lymph nodes (LNs) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on Halcyon Linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS After completing the in-house multitarget end-to-end phantom testing and independent dose verification using MD Anderson's single-isocenter/multi-target (lung and spine target inserts) thorax phantom, eight patients with two to three abdominal/pelvic oligometastatic LNs underwent highly conformal single-isocenter VMAT-SBRT treatment using the Halcyon Linac 6MV flattening filter free (FFF) beam. Targets were identified using an Axumin PET/CT scan co-registered with planning CT images and a single-isocenter was placed between/among the targets. Doses between 25 and 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were delivered. Patients were treated every other day. Plans were calculated in Eclipse with advanced AcurosXB algorithm for heterogeneity corrections. For comparison, Halcyon VMAT-SBRT plans were retrospectively generated for SBRT-dedicated TrueBeam with a 6MV-FFF beam using identical planning geometry and objectives. Target coverage, conformity index (CI), dose to 2 cm away from each target (D2cm) and dose to adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated. Additionally, various treatment delivery parameters including beam-on time were recorded. RESULTS Phantom measurements showed acceptable spatial accuracy of conebeam CT-guided Halcyon SBRT treatments including compliance with MD Anderson's single-isocenter/multi-targets phantom credentialing results. For patients, the mean isocenter to tumor center distance was 3.4 ± 1.2 cm (range, 1.5-4.8 cm). The mean combined PTV was 18.9 ± 10.9 cc (range, 5.6-39.5 cc). There was no clinically significant difference in dose to LNs, CI, D2cm and maximal doses to OAR between single-isocenter Halcyon and Truebeam VMAT-SBRT plans, although, Halcyon plans provided preferably lower maximal dose to adjacent OAR. Additionally, total monitor units, beam-on time and overall treatment time was lower with Halcyon plans. Halcyon's portal dosimetry demonstrated a high pass rate of 98.1 ± 1.6% for clinical gamma passing criteria of 2%/2 mm. CONCLUSION SBRT treatment of abdominal/pelvic oligometastatic LNs with single-isocenter VMAT on Halcyon was dosimetrically equivalent to TrueBeam. Faster treatment delivery to oligometastatic LNs via single-isocenter Halcyon VMAT can improve clinic workflow and patient compliance, potentially reducing intrafraction motion errors for well-suited patients. Clinical follow-up of these patients is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKYUSA
| | - Aaron Webster
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKYUSA
| | - Joseph Stephen
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKYUSA
| | - William St Clair
- Medical Physics Graduate ProgramDepartment of Radiation MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hernandez V, Saez J, Angerud A, Cayez R, Khamphan C, Nguyen D, Vieillevigne L, Feygelman V. Dosimetric leaf gap and leaf trailing effect in a double-stacked multileaf collimator. Med Phys 2021; 48:3413-3424. [PMID: 33932237 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate (i) the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and the effect of the "trailing distance" between leaves from different multileaf collimator (MLC) layers in Halcyon systems and (ii) the ability of the currently available treatment planning systems (TPSs) to approximate this effect. METHODS DICOM plans with transmission beams and sweeping gap tests were created in Python for measuring the DLG for each MLC layer independently and for both layers combined. In clinical Halcyon plans both MLC layers are interchangeably used and leaves from different layers are offset, thus forming a trailing pattern. To characterize the impact of such configuration, new tests called "trailing sweeping gaps" were designed and created where the leaves from one layer follow the leaves from the other layer at a fixed "trailing distance" t between the tips. Measurements were carried out on five Halcyons SX2 from different institutions and calculations from both the Eclipse and RayStation TPSs were compared with measurements. RESULTS The dose accumulated during a sweeping gap delivery progressively increased with the trailing distance t . We call this "the trailing effect." It is most pronounced for t between 0 and 5 mm, although some changes were obtained up to 20 mm. The dose variation was independent of the gap size. The measured DLG values also increased with t up to 20 mm, again with the steepest variation between 0 and 5 mm. Measured DLG values were negative at t = 0 (the leaves from both layers at the same position) but changed sign for t ≥ 1 mm, in line with the positive DLG sign usually observed with single-layer rounded-end MLCs. The Eclipse TPS does not explicitly model the leaf tip and, as a consequence, could not predict the dose reduction due to the trailing effect. This resulted in dose discrepancies up to +10% and -8% for the 5 mm sweeping gap and up to ±5% for the 10 mm one depending on the distance t . RayStation implements a simple model of the leaf tip that was able to approximate the trailing effect and improved the agreement with measured doses. In particular, with a prototype version of RayStation that assigned a higher transmission at the leaf tip the agreement with measured doses was within ±3% even for the 5 mm gap. The five Halcyon systems behaved very similarly but differences in the DLG around 0.2 mm were found across different treatment units and between MLC layers from the same system. The DLG for the proximal layer was consistently higher than for the distal layer, with differences ranging between 0.10 mm and 0.24 mm. CONCLUSIONS The trailing distance between the leaves from different layers substantially affected the doses delivered by sweeping gaps and the measured DLG values. Stacked MLCs introduce a new level of complexity in TPSs, which ideally need to implement an explicit model of the leaf tip in order to reproduce the trailing effect. Dynamic tests called "trailing sweeping gaps" were designed that are useful for characterizing and commissioning dual-layer MLC systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, 43204, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Jordi Saez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Romain Cayez
- Department of Medical Physics, Oscar Lambret Center, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Catherine Khamphan
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Sainte-Catherine, 84000, Avignon, France
| | - Daniel Nguyen
- Centre de Radiothérapie de Mâcon, 71000, Mâcon, France
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud-Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 31059, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse UMR1037 INSERM, Université Toulouse 3-ERL5294 CNRS, Oncopole, 31037, Toulouse, France
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, 12902, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Quintero P, Cheng Y, Benoit D, Moore C, Beavis A. Effect of treatment planning system parameters on beam modulation complexity for treatment plans with single-layer multi-leaf collimator and dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201011. [PMID: 33882242 PMCID: PMC8173683 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High levels of beam modulation complexity (MC) and monitor units (MU) can compromise the plan deliverability of intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatments. Our study evaluates the effect of three treatment planning system (TPS) parameters on MC and MU using different multi-leaf collimator (MLC) architectures. METHODS 192 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were calculated using one virtual prostate phantom considering three main settings: (1) three TPS-parameters (Convergence; Aperture Shape Controller, ASC; and Dose Calculation Resolution, DCR) selected from Eclipse v15.6, (2) four levels of dose-sparing priority for organs at risk (OAR), and (3) two treatment units with same nominal conformity resolution and different MLC architectures (Halcyon-v2 dual-layer MLC, DL-MLC & TrueBeam single-layer MLC, SL-MLC). We use seven complexity metrics to evaluate the MC, including two new metrics for DL-MLC, assessed by their correlation with γ passing rate (GPR) analysis. RESULTS DL-MLC plans demonstrated lower dose-sparing values than SL-MLC plans (p<0.05). TPS-parameters did not change significantly the complexity metrics for either MLC architectures. However, for SL-MLC, significant variations of MU, target volume dose-homogeneity, and dose spillage were associated with ASC and DCR (p<0.05). MU were found to be correlated (highly or moderately) with all complexity metrics (p<0.05) for both MLC plans. Additionally, our new complexity metrics presented a moderate correlation with GPR (r<0.65). An important correlation was demonstrated between MC (plan deliverability) and dose-sparing priority level for DL-MLC. CONCLUSIONS TPS-parameters selected do not change MC for DL-MLC architecture, but they might have a potential use to control the MU, PTV homogeneity or dose spillage for SL-MLC. Our new DL-MLC complexity metrics presented important information to be considered in future pre-treatment quality assurance programs. Finally, the prominent dependence between plan deliverability and priority applied to OAR dose sparing for DL-MLC needs to be analyzed and considered as an additional predictor of GPRs in further studies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Dose-sparing priority might influence in modulation complexity of DL-MLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Quintero
- Medical Physics Service, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.,Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Yongqiang Cheng
- Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - David Benoit
- Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Craig Moore
- Medical Physics Service, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Andrew Beavis
- Medical Physics Service, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.,Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cai B, Laugeman E, Hsu H, Green O, Knutson N, Goddu SM, Mutic S, Du S, Henke L, Kim H, Hugo GD. Technical Note: Self-shielding evaluation and radiation leakage measurement of a jawless ring gantry linac with a beam stopper. Med Phys 2021; 48:3143-3150. [PMID: 33763897 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the shielding design and leakage radiation from a newly released ring gantry linac (Halcyon, Varian Medical Systems). METHODS To assess the radiation leakage surrounding headshield and the radiation level after the beam stopper, measurements were made with GafChromic films. To evaluate the in-room radiation levels, the radiation leakage in the isocenter plane was measured with a large volume spherical ionization chamber (Exradin A6, Standard Imaging). A lead enclosure was constructed to shield the chamber from the low energy scatter radiation from the room. The radiation level at multiple locations was measured with the MLC fully closed and gantry at 0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, 270, and 315 degrees. The leakage radiation passing through multiple concrete slabs with various thickness was recorded in a narrow beam geometry to determine the tenth value layer (TVL). RESULTS A uniform leakage (<0.05%) at 1 m from electron beam line was measured surrounding the linac head with the maximum leakage measured at the top of the head enclosure. The highest radiation level (<0.08%) was measured near the edge of the beam stopper when projected to the measurement plane. The maximum radiation levels due to the head leakage at 15 locations inside the treatment room were recorded and a radiation map was plotted. The maximum leakage was measured at points that along the electron beam line while the gantry at 90 or 270 degree and at the end of head enclosure (0.314%, 0.4 m from electron beamline). The leakage TVL value is found to be 226 mm in a narrow beam geometry with the concrete density of 2.16 g/cm3 or 134.6 lb/cu.ft. CONCLUSION An overall uniform leakage was measured surrounding linac head. The beam stopper shields the primary radiation with the highest valued measured near the edge of beam stopper. The leakage TVL values are derived and less than the values reported for conventional C-arm linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Eric Laugeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - HsinLu Hsu
- Varian Medical Systems, 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Olga Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Nels Knutson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - S Murty Goddu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Varian Medical Systems, 3100 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Shuhua Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Colnot J, Zefkili S, Gschwind R, Huet C. Out-of-field doses from radiotherapy using photon beams: A comparative study for a pediatric renal treatment. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:94-106. [PMID: 33547766 PMCID: PMC7984471 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE First, this experimental study aims at comparing out-of-field doses delivered by three radiotherapy techniques (3DCRT, VMAT (two different accelerators), and tomotherapy) for a pediatric renal treatment. Secondly, the accuracy of treatment planning systems (TPS) for out-of-field calculation is evaluated. METHODS EBT3 films were positioned in pediatric phantoms (5 and 10 yr old). They were irradiated according to four plans: 3DCRT (Clinac 2100CS, Varian), VMAT (Clinac 2100CS and Halcyon, Varian), and tomotherapy for a same target volume. 3D dose determination was performed with an in-house Matlab tool using linear interpolation of film measurements. 1D and 3D comparisons were made between techniques. Finally, measurements were compared to the Eclipse (Varian) and Tomotherapy (Accuray) TPS calculations. RESULTS Advanced radiotherapy techniques (VMATs and tomotherapy) deliver higher out-of-field doses compared to 3DCRT due to increased beam-on time triggered by intensity modulation. Differences increase with distance to target and reach a factor of 3 between VMAT and 3DCRT. Besides, tomotherapy delivers lower doses than VMAT: although tomotherapy beam-on time is higher than in VMAT, the additional shielding of the Hi-Art system reduces out-of-field doses. The latest generation Halcyon system proves to deliver lower peripheral doses than conventional accelerators. Regarding TPS calculation, tomotherapy proves to be suitable for out-of-field dose determination up to 30 cm from field edge whereas Eclipse (AAA and AXB) largely underestimates those doses. CONCLUSION This study shows that the high dose conformation allowed by advanced radiotherapy is done at the cost of higher peripheral doses. In the context of treatment-related risk estimation, the consequence of this increase might be significative. Modern systems require adapted head shielding and a particular attention has to be taken regarding on-board imaging dose. Finally, TPS advanced dose calculation algorithms do not certify dose accuracy beyond field edges, and thus, those doses are not suitable for risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Colnot
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Service de Recherche en Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Institut Curie, Service de Physique Médicale, Paris, France
| | - Régine Gschwind
- Université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, LCE UMR 6249, Montbéliard, France
| | - Christelle Huet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Service de Recherche en Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
r-UNet: Leaf Position Reconstruction in Upstream Radiotherapy Verification. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2020.2994648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
43
|
Saini A, Tichacek C, Johansson W, Redler G, Zhang G, Moros EG, Qayyum M, Feygelman V. Unlocking a closed system: dosimetric commissioning of a ring gantry linear accelerator in a multivendor environment. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:21-34. [PMID: 33452738 PMCID: PMC7882119 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Halcyon™ platform is self‐contained, combining a treatment planning (Eclipse) system TPS) with information management and radiation delivery components. The standard TPS beam model is configured and locked down by the vendor. A portal dosimetry‐based system for patient‐specific QA (PSQA) is also included. While ensuring consistency across the user base, this closed model may not be optimal for every department. We set out to commission independent TPS (RayStation 9B, RaySearch Laboratories) and PSQA (PerFraction, Sun Nuclear Corp.) systems for use with the Halcyon linac. The output factors and PDDs for very small fields (0.5 × 0.5 cm2) were collected to augment the standard Varian dataset. The MLC leaf‐end parameters were estimated based on the various static and dynamic tests with simple model fields and honed by minimizing the mean and standard deviation of dose difference between the ion chamber measurements and RayStation Monte Carlo calculations for 15 VMAT and IMRT test plans. Two chamber measurements were taken per plan, in the high (isocenter) and lower dose regions. The ratio of low to high doses ranged from 0.4 to 0.8. All percent dose differences were expressed relative to the local dose. The mean error was 0.0 ± 1.1% (TG119‐style confidence limit ± 2%). Gamma analysis with the helical diode array using the standard 3%Global/2mm criteria resulted in the average passing rate of 99.3 ± 0.5% (confidence limit 98.3%–100%). The average local dose error for all detectors across all plans was 0.2% ± 5.3%. The ion chamber results compared favorably with our recalculation with Eclipse and PerFraction, as well as with several published Eclipse reports. Dose distribution gamma analysis comparisons between RayStation and PerFraction with 2%Local/2mm criteria yielded an average passing rate of 98.5% ± 0.8% (confidence limit 96.9%–100%). It is feasible to use the Halcyon accelerator with independent planning and verification systems without sacrificing dosimetric accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amarjit Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Chris Tichacek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - William Johansson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Geoffrey Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo G Moros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chen J, Dai J, Nobah A, Bai S, Bi N, Lai Y, Li M, Tian Y, Wang X, Fu Q, Liang B, Zhang T, Xia W, Xu Y, Ren W, Yan X, Zhu J, Chen D, Yang J. A Special Report on 2019 International Planning Competition and a Comprehensive Analysis of Its Results. Front Oncol 2020; 10:571644. [PMID: 33344231 PMCID: PMC7746833 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.571644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this work is to introduce the 2019 International Planning Competition and to analyze its results. Methods and materials A locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) case using the simultaneous integrated boost approach was selected. The plan quality was evaluated by using a ranking system in accordance with practice guidelines. Planners used their clinical Treatment Planning System (TPS) to generate the best possible plan along with a survey, designed to obtain medical physics aspects information. We investigated the quality of the large population of plans designed by worldwide planners using different planning and delivery systems. The correlations of plan quality with relevant planner characteristics (work experience, department scale, and competition experience) and with technological parameters (TPS and modality) were examined. Results The number of the qualified plans was 287 with a wide range of scores (38.61–97.99). The scores showed statistically significant differences by the following factors: 1) department scale: the mean score (89.76 ± 8.36) for planners from the departments treating >2,000 patients annually was the highest of all; 2) competition experience: the mean score for the 107 planners with previous competition experience was 88.92 ± 9.59, statistically significantly from first-time participants (p = .001); 3) techniques: the mean scores for planners using VMAT (89.18 ± 6.43) and TOMO (90.62 ± 7.60) were higher than those using IMRT (82.28 ± 12.47), with statistical differences (p <.001). The plan scores were negligibly correlated with the planner’s years of work experience or the type of TPS used. Regression analysis demonstrated that plan score was associated with dosimetric objectives that were difficult to achieve, which is generally consistent with a clinical practice evaluation. However, 51.2% of the planners abandoned the difficult component of total lung receiving a dose of 5 Gy in their plan design to achieve the optimal plan. Conclusion The 2019 international planning competition was carried out successfully, and its results were analyzed. Plan quality was not correlated with work experiences or the TPS used, but it was correlated with department scale, modality, and competition experience. These findings differed from those reported in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ahmad Nobah
- Radiation Physics Section, Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Youqun Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Minghui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuetao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qi Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlong Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenting Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuena Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Deqi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiming Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pokhrel D, Visak J, Critchfield LC, Stephen J, Bernard ME, Randall M, Kudrimoti M. Clinical validation of ring-mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: comparison to SBRT-dedicated C-arm linac treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 22:261-270. [PMID: 33342070 PMCID: PMC7856490 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung tumors via the ring‐mounted Halcyon Linac, a fast kilovoltage cone beam CT‐guided treatment with coplanar geometry, a single energy 6MV flattening filter free (FFF) beam and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a fast, safe, and feasible treatment modality for selected lung cancer patients. Four‐dimensional (4D) CT‐based treatment plans were generated using advanced AcurosXB algorithm with heterogeneity corrections using an SBRT board and Halcyon couch insert. Halcyon VMAT‐SBRT plans with stacked and staggered multileaf collimators produced highly conformal radiosurgical dose distribution to the target, lower intermediate dose spillage, and similar dose to adjacent organs at risks (OARs) compared to SBRT‐dedicated highly conformal clinical noncoplanar Truebeam VMAT plans following the RTOG‐0813 requirements. Due to low monitor units per fraction and less multileaf collimator (MLC) modulation, the Halcyon VMAT plan can deliver lung SBRT fractions with an overall treatment time of less than 15 min (for 50 Gy in five fractions), significantly improving patient comfort and clinic workflow. Higher pass rates of quality assurance results demonstrate a more accurate treatment delivery on Halcyon. We have implemented Halcyon for lung SBRT treatment in our clinic. We suggest others use Halcyon for lung SBRT treatments using abdominal compression or 4D CT‐based treatment planning, thus expanding the access of curative ultra‐hypofractionated treatments to other centers with only a Halcyon Linac. Clinical follow‐up results for patients treated on Halcyon Linac with lung SBRT is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Justin Visak
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Lana C Critchfield
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph Stephen
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mark E Bernard
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Marcus Randall
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mahesh Kudrimoti
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pokhrel D, Tackett T, Stephen J, Visak J, Amin-Zimmerman F, McGregor A, Strup SE, St Clair W. Prostate SBRT using O-Ring Halcyon Linac - Plan quality, delivery efficiency, and accuracy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 22:68-75. [PMID: 33340388 PMCID: PMC7856496 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Cone beam CT‐guided prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment on the recently installed novel O‐ring coplanar geometry Halcyon Linac with a single energy 6MV‐flattening filter free (FFF) beam and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a fast, safe, and feasible treatment modality for early stage low‐ and intermediate‐risk prostate cancer patients. Following the RTOG‐0938 compliance criteria and utilizing two‐full arc geometry, VMAT prostate SBRT plans were generated for ten consecutive patients using advanced Acuros‐based algorithm for heterogeneity corrections with Halcyon couch insert. Halcyon VMAT plans with the stacked and staggered multileaf collimators (MLC) produced highly conformal SBRT dose distributions to the prostate, lower intermediate dose spillage and similar dose to adjacent organs‐at‐risks (OARs) compared to SBRT‐dedicated Truebeam VMAT plans. Due to lower monitor units per fraction and less MLC modulation through the target, the Halcyon VMAT plan can deliver prostate SBRT fractions in and overall treatment time of less than 10 minutes (for 36.25 Gy in five fractions), significantly improving patient compliance and clinic workflow. Pretreatment quality assurance results were similar to Truebeam VMAT plans. We have implemented Halcyon Linac for prostate SBRT treatment in our institution. We recommend that others use Halcyon for prostate SBRT treatments to expand the access of curative hypofractionated treatments to other clinics only equipped with a Halcyon Linac. Clinical follow‐up results for patients who underwent prostate SBRT treatment on our Halcyon Linac is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damodar Pokhrel
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Tanner Tackett
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph Stephen
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Justin Visak
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Andrew McGregor
- Lexington Clinic, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Stephen E Strup
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - William St Clair
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chen J, Cui W, Fu Q, Zhang H, Huang X, Han F, Xia W, Liang B, Dai J. Influence of maximum MLC leaf speed on the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:37-47. [PMID: 33047486 PMCID: PMC7700941 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Maximum leaf speed is a configurable parameter of MLC in a treatment‐planning system. This study investigated the influence of MLC on the quality of VMAT plans. Methods Seven MLCs with different maximum leaf speeds (1.0, 1.5, 2.25, 3.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 cm/s) were configured for an accelerator in treatment‐planning system. Correspondingly, seven treatment plans, with the identical initial optimization parameter, were designed with the mdaccAutoPlan system. Six nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and nine rectal cancer patients were selected, representing complex and simple clinical circumstances. VMAT plan quality was evaluated with PlanIQTM software. The results were statistically analyzed with a one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison tests. Results The relative changes of plan scores achieved by the seven configured accelerators, with specific maximum MLC leaf speed (MMLS) for each patient, were studied. Two apparent trends of MMLS influence on VMAT plan scores were observed: Plan scores increased with MMLS; Plan scores increased rapidly when MMLS increased from 1 to 3.5, thus the relative change of plan score decreased in this MMLS range. The stationary point of maximum MLC speed (MMSSP) is defined, for the specific MMLS when the relative changes of plan scores is first <5%, as MMLS increases from 1.0 to 10. For rectal plans, MMSSPs were 2.25 for six patients and 3.5 for the other three patients. For NPC plans, MMSSPs were 3.5 for five patients and 2.25 for one patient. Conclusion This work indicates that MMLS directly influences VMAT plan quality in NPC cases and rectal cancer cases. VMAT plan quality improved conspicuously as MMLS increased from 1 to 3.5, VMAT plan quality with marginal improvement when MMLS is above 3.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayun Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weijie Cui
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Fu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haojia Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Han
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlong Xia
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Liang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tamura M, Matsumoto K, Otsuka M, Monzen H. Plan complexity quantification of dual-layer multi-leaf collimator for volumetric modulated arc therapy with Halcyon linac. Phys Eng Sci Med 2020; 43:947-957. [DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00891-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
49
|
Fogliata A, Cayez R, Garcia R, Khamphan C, Reggiori G, Scorsetti M, Cozzi L. Technical Note: Flattening filter free beam from Halcyon linac: Evaluation of the profile parameters for quality assurance. Med Phys 2020; 47:3669-3674. [PMID: 32367534 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of flattening filter free (FFF) beams generated by standard linear accelerators is increasing in the clinical practice. The radiation intensity peaked toward the beam central axis is properly managed in the optimization process of treatment planning through intensity modulation. Specific FFF parameters for profile analysis, as unflatness and slope for FFF beams, based on the renormalization factor concept has been introduced for quality assurance purposes. Recently, Halcyon, an O-ring based linear accelerator equipped with a 6 MV FFF beam only has been introduced by Varian. METHODS Renormalization factors and related fit parameters according to Fogliata et al. ["Definition of parameters for quality assurance of FFF photon beams in radiation therapy," Med. Phys. 39, 6455-6464 (2012)] have been evaluated for the 6 MV FFF beam generated by Halcyon units. The Halcyon representative beam data provided by Varian were used. Dose fall-off at the field edges was matched with an unflattened beam generated by a 6 MV from a TrueBeam linac. Consistency of the results was evaluated against measurements on a clinical Halcyon unit, as well as a TrueBeam 6 MV FFF for comparison. RESULTS The five parameters in the analytical equation for estimating the renormalization factor were determined with an R2 of 0.997. The comparison of the unflatness parameters between the Halcyon representative and hospital beam data was consistent within a range of 0.6%. Consistently with the computed parameters, the Halcyon profiles resulted in a less pronounced peak than TrueBeam. CONCLUSION Renormalization factors and related fit parameters from the 6 MV FFF beam generated by the Varian Halcyon unit are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fogliata
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - R Cayez
- Oscar Lambret Center, rue Frédéric Combemale, Radiotherapy, 59000, Lille, France
| | - R Garcia
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Sainte-Catherine, 250 Chemin de Baigne Pieds, 84000, Avignon, France
| | - C Khamphan
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Sainte-Catherine, 250 Chemin de Baigne Pieds, 84000, Avignon, France
| | - G Reggiori
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - L Cozzi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Radiotherapy Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Laugeman E, Heermann A, Hilliard J, Watts M, Roberson M, Morris R, Goddu S, Sethi A, Zoberi I, Kim H, Mutic S, Hugo G, Cai B. Comprehensive validation of halcyon 2.0 plans and the implementation of patient specific QA with multiple detector platforms. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:39-48. [PMID: 32368862 PMCID: PMC7386180 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To perform a comprehensive validation of plans generated on a preconfigured Halcyon 2.0 with preloaded beam model, including evaluations of new features and implementing the patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) process with multiple detectors. Methods A total of 56 plans were generated in Eclipse V15.6 (Varian Medical System) with a preconfigured Halcyon treatment machine. Ten plans were developed via the AAPM TG‐119 test suite with both IMRT and VMAT techniques. 34 clinically treated plans using C‐arm LINAC from 24 patients were replanned on Halcyon using IMRT or VMAT techniques for a variety of sites including: brain, head and neck, lung, breast, abdomen, and pelvis. Six of those plans were breast VMAT plans utilizing the extended treatment field technique available with Halcyon 2.0. The dynamically flattened beam (DFB), another new feature on Halcyon 2.0, was also used for an AP/PA spine and four field box pelvis, as well as ten 3D breast plans. All 56 plans were measured with an ion chamber (IC), film, portal dosimetry (PD), ArcCHECK, and Delta4. Tolerance and action limits were calculated and compared to the recommendations of TG‐218. Results TG‐119 IC and film confidence limits met those set by the task group, except for IMRT target point dose. Forty‐four of 46 clinical plans were within 3% for IC measurements. Average gamma passing rates with 3% dose difference and 2mm distance‐to‐agreement for IMRT/VMAT plans were: Film – 96.8%, PD – 99.9%, ArcCHECK – 99.1%, and Delta4 – 99.2%. Calculated action limits were: Film – 86.3%, PD – 98.4%, ArcCHECK – 96.1%, and Delta4 – 95.7%. Extended treatment field technique was fully validated and 3D plans with DFB had similar results to IMRT/VMAT plans. Conclusion Halcyon plan deliveries were verified with multiple measurement devices. New features of Halcyon 2.0 were also validated. Traditional PSQA techniques and process specific tolerance and action limits were successfully implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Laugeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ana Heermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jessica Hilliard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael Watts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Marshia Roberson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sreekrishna Goddu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Abhishek Sethi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Imran Zoberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Geoffrey Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|