1
|
Blommaert J, De Saint‐Hubert M, Depuydt T, Oldehinkel E, Poortmans P, Amant F, Lambrecht M. Challenges and opportunities for proton therapy during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:767-774. [PMID: 37491770 PMCID: PMC10993337 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
During pregnancy, the use of radiation therapy for cancer treatment is often considered impossible due to the assumed associated fetal risks. However, suboptimal treatment of pregnant cancer patients and unjustifiable delay in radiation therapy until after delivery can be harmful for both patient and child. In non-pregnant patients, proton-radiation therapy is increasingly administered because of its favorable dosimetric properties compared with photon-radiation therapy. Although data on the use of pencil beam scanning proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy are scarce, different case reports and dosimetric studies have indicated a more than 10-fold reduction in fetal radiation exposure compared with photon-radiation therapy. Nonetheless, the implementation of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy requires complex fetal dosimetry for the neutron-dominated out-of-field radiation dose and faces a lack of clinical guidelines. Further exploration and standardization of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy will be necessary to improve radiotherapeutic management of pregnant women with cancer and further reduce risks for their offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation OncologyIridium Netwerk & University of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
| | - Frederic Amant
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van LeeuwenhoekNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division Gynecologic OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oldenburger E, De Roover R, Poels K, Depuydt T, Isebaert S, Haustermans K. "Scan-(pre)Plan-Treat" Workflow for Bone Metastases Using the Ethos Therapy System: A Single-Center, In Silico Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101258. [PMID: 37305069 PMCID: PMC10248728 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report on the accuracy of automated delineation, treatment plan quality, and duration of an in-silico "scan-(pre)plan-treat" (SPT) workflow for vertebral bone metastases using a 1 × 8 Gy regimen. Method and Materials The cloud-based emulator system of the Ethos therapy system was used to adapt an organ-at-risk-sparing preplan created on the diagnostic CT to the anatomy-of-the-day using the cone beam CT made before treatment. Results SPT using the Ethos emulator system resulted in relatively good coverage of the PTV and acceptable dose to the OAR. Delivery time and plan homogeneity was the best for 7-field IMRT plan template. Conclusions A SPT workflow formula results in a highly conformal treatment delivery while maintaining an acceptable timeframe for the patient on the treatment couch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colson D, Blommaert J, Poels K, De Saint-Hubert M, Reniers B, Depuydt T. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS ®ONE proton beam in TOPAS/GEANT4. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:21NT02. [PMID: 37844576 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad03a9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective:This study evaluates a compact Monte Carlo (MC) model of a pencil beam scanning clinical proton beam using TOPAS to estimate the dose out-of-field (OOF). Compact modelling means that the model starts from a pristine proton beam at the nozzle exit, customised based on acceptance and commissioning data, instead of modelling the full treatment head and room.Approach: First, in-field validation tests were performed. Then, the OOF dose was validated in an RW3 phantom with bubble detectors for personal neutron dosimetry (measuring the neutron dose equivalent) and thermoluminiescent detectors (measuring the absorbed dose by protons and gammas). Measurements were performed at 15 and 35 cm from the distal edge of the field for five different irradiation plans, covering different beam orientations, proton energies and a 40 mm range shifter. TOPAS simulations were performed with QGSP Binary Cascade HP (BIC) and QGSP Bertini HP (Bertini) hadron physics lists.Main results: In-field validation shows that MC simulations agree with point dose measurements within -2.5 % and +1.5 % at locations on- and off-axis and before, in and after the Bragg peak or plateau. The gamma passing rate 2%/3mm of four simulated treatment plans compared to the dose distribution calculated by the TPS exceeds 97 % agreement score. OOF dose simulations showed an average overestimation of 27 % of the neutron dose equivalent for the BIC hadron physics list and an average underestimation of 20 % for the Bertini hadron physics list. The simulated absorbed dose of protons and gammas showed a systematic underestimation which was on average 21 % and 51 % for BIC and Bertini respectively.Significance: Our study demonstrates that a compact MC model can reliably produce in-field data, while out-of-field dose data are within the uncertainties of the detector systems and MC simulations nuclear models, and do so with shorter modelling and faster calculation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dries Colson
- Hasselt University, Faculty of Engineering Technology - Nuclear Technology (NuTeC), Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Kenneth Poels
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marijke De Saint-Hubert
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Research in Dosimetric Applications, Mol, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Reniers
- Hasselt University, Faculty of Engineering Technology - Nuclear Technology (NuTeC), Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- KU Leuven, department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Givanoudi S, Heyndrickx M, Depuydt T, Khorshid M, Robbens J, Wagner P. A Review on Bio- and Chemosensors for the Detection of Biogenic Amines in Food Safety Applications: The Status in 2022. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:613. [PMID: 36679407 PMCID: PMC9860941 DOI: 10.3390/s23020613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This article provides an overview on the broad topic of biogenic amines (BAs) that are a persistent concern in the context of food quality and safety. They emerge mainly from the decomposition of amino acids in protein-rich food due to enzymes excreted by pathogenic bacteria that infect food under inappropriate storage conditions. While there are food authority regulations on the maximum allowed amounts of, e.g., histamine in fish, sensitive individuals can still suffer from medical conditions triggered by biogenic amines, and mass outbreaks of scombroid poisoning are reported regularly. We review first the classical techniques used for selective BA detection and quantification in analytical laboratories and focus then on sensor-based solutions aiming at on-site BA detection throughout the food chain. There are receptor-free chemosensors for BA detection and a vastly growing range of bio- and biomimetic sensors that employ receptors to enable selective molecular recognition. Regarding the receptors, we address enzymes, antibodies, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), and aptamers as the most recent class of BA receptors. Furthermore, we address the underlying transducer technologies, including optical, electrochemical, mass-sensitive, and thermal-based sensing principles. The review concludes with an assessment on the persistent limitations of BA sensors, a technological forecast, and thoughts on short-term solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Givanoudi
- Technology and Food Science Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Brusselsesteenweg 370, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
- Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, ZMB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
- Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Marine Division—Cell Blue Biotech/Food Integrity, Jacobsenstraat 1, B-8400 Oostende, Belgium
| | - Marc Heyndrickx
- Technology and Food Science Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Brusselsesteenweg 370, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, ZMB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mehran Khorshid
- Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, ZMB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Robbens
- Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Marine Division—Cell Blue Biotech/Food Integrity, Jacobsenstraat 1, B-8400 Oostende, Belgium
| | - Patrick Wagner
- Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, ZMB, Department of Physics and Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao L, Liu G, Souris K, Wuyckens S, Janssens G, Poels K, Delor A, Depuydt T, Deraniyagala R, Stevens C, Li X, Ding X. Machine-Specific Delivery Sequence Model of Compact Superconducting Synchrocyclotron Proton Therapy Systems – A Multi-Institutional Investigation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.2156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Heimovaara JH, Blommaert J, Free J, Bolt RA, Gort EM, Depuydt T, Boso Martinez C, Schoots MH, van Gerwen M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Langendijk JA, Schröder CP, Amant F, Gordijn SJ, Oldehinkel E. Proton therapy of a pregnant patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:33-36. [PMID: 35601798 PMCID: PMC9114153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiotherapy during pregnancy is rarely administered due to lack of data and practical challenges. This is the first detailed report of proton therapy as cancer treatment for a pregnant patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Materials and methods Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was prescribed to a pregnant patient to a total dose of 70 Gy (RBE) to the therapeutic CTV and 54.25 Gy to the prophylactic CTV, delivered in 35 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Results Phantom measurements showed a thirty-fold decrease in fetal radiation dose when using proton compared to photon therapy, with a total fetal dose of 5.5 mSv for the complete proton treatment, compared to 185 and 298 mSv for the photon treatment with and without lead shielding, respectively. After adminstering proton therapy during pregnancy, at 39 weeks of gestation, a healthy boy with a birthweight on the 83th percentile was delivered. Pediatric follow-up at 2 months of age of the offspring showed normal growth and age-adequate motor development with no signs of neurological problems. MR follow-up of the tumor 3 months after the end of treatment showed complete remission. Conclusion This case demonstrates the potential of proton therapy for treatment during pregnancy.Compared to photon therapy, proton therapy can significantly limit fetal dose, while simultaneously offering a more optimized treatment to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joosje H. Heimovaara
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeffrey Free
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - René A. Bolt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elske M. Gort
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Mirthe H. Schoots
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, Pathology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde van Gerwen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien P. Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sanne J. Gordijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dewit B, Depuydt T. PO-1635 Novel concept for patient-specific immobilization using generative design and additive manufacturing. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03599-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
8
|
Delombaerde L, Petillion S, De Roover R, Depuydt T. PO-1692 Range shifter air gaps optimized for SGRT on a PBS system for intracranial and thoracic treatments. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03656-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
9
|
Muurholm CG, Ravkilde T, De Roover R, Skouboe S, Hansen R, Crijns W, Depuydt T, Poulsen PR. Experimental investigation of dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during prostate tracking radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:3574-3584. [PMID: 35395104 PMCID: PMC9322296 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypofractionation in prostate radiotherapy is of increasing interest. Steep dose gradients and a large weight on each individual fraction emphasize the need for motion management. Real-time motion management techniques such as multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking or couch tracking typically adjust for translational motion while rotations remain uncompensated with unknown dosimetric impact. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to demonstrate and validate dynamic real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during radiotherapy experiments with and without MLC and couch tracking. METHODS Real-time dose reconstruction was performed using the in-house developed software DoseTracker. DoseTracker receives streamed target positions and accelerator parameters during treatment delivery and uses a pencil beam algorithm with water density assumption to reconstruct the dose in a moving target. DoseTracker's ability to reconstruct motion-induced dose errors in a dynamically rotating and translating target was investigated during three different scenarios: (1) no motion compensation and translational motion correction with (2) MLC tracking and (3) couch tracking. In each scenario, dose reconstruction was performed online and in real-time during delivery of two dual-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate plans with a prescribed fraction dose of 7 Gy to the prostate and simultaneous intraprostatic lesion boosts with doses of at least 8 Gy, but up to 10 Gy as long as the organs-at-risk dose constraints were fulfilled. The plans were delivered to a pelvis phantom that replicated three patient-measured motion traces using a rotational insert with 21 layers of EBT3 film spaced 2.5 mm apart. DoseTracker repeatedly calculated the actual motion-including dose increment and the planned static dose increment since the last calculation in 84500 points in the film stack. The experiments were performed with a TrueBeam accelerator with MLC and couch tracking based on electromagnetic transponders embedded in the film stack. The motion-induced dose error was quantified as the difference between the final cumulative dose with motion and without motion using the 2D 2%/2mm γ-failure rate and the difference in dose to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV ΔD95% ) and the gross target volume (GTV ΔD95% ) as well as the difference in dose to 0.1 cm3 of the urethra, bladder, and rectum (ΔD0.1CC ). The motion-induced errors were compared between dose reconstructions and film measurements. RESULTS The dose was reconstructed in all calculation points at a mean frequency of 4.7 Hz. The root-mean-square difference between real-time reconstructed and film measured motion-induced errors was 3.1%-points (γ-failure rate), 0.13 Gy (CTV ΔD95% ), 0.23 Gy (GTV ΔD95% ), 0.19 Gy (urethra ΔD0.1CC ), 0.09 Gy (bladder ΔD0.1CC ), and 0.07 Gy (rectum ΔD0.1CC ). CONCLUSIONS In a series of phantom experiments, online real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction was performed for the first time. The calculated motion-induced errors agreed well with film measurements. The dose reconstruction provides a valuable tool for monitoring dose delivery and investigating the efficacy of advanced motion-compensation techniques in the presence of translational and rotational motion. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Ravkilde
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Simon Skouboe
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rune Hansen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Per R Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Groen VH, van Schie M, Zuithoff NPA, Monninkhof EM, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Pos FJ, Smeenk RJ, Haustermans K, Isebaert S, Draulans C, Depuydt T, Verkooijen HM, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW. Urethral and bladder dose-effect relations for late genitourinary toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:127-132. [PMID: 34968470 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE or objectives The FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed that by adding a focal boost to conventional fractionated EBRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer, the five-year biochemical disease-free survival increased, without significantly increasing toxicity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between radiation dose to the bladder and urethra and genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade ≥2 in the entire cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS The dose-effect relations of the urethra and bladder dose, separately, and GU toxicity grade ≥2 (CTCAE 3.0) up to five years after treatment were assessed. A mixed model analysis for repeated measurements was used, adjusting for age, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline GU toxicity grade ≥1 and institute. Additionally, the association between the dose and separate GU toxicity subdomains were investigated. RESULTS Dose-effect relations were observed for the dose (Gy) to the bladder D2cm3 and urethra D0.1cm3, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.14 (95% CI 1.12-1.16, p<0.0001) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.11-1.14, p<0.0001), respectively. Additionally, associations between the dose to the urethra and bladder and the subdomains urinary frequency, urinary retention and urinary incontinence were observed. CONCLUSION Further increasing the dose to the bladder and urethra will result in a significant increase in GU toxicity following EBRT. Focal boost treatment plans should incorporate a urethral dose-constraint. Further treatment optimization to increase the focal boost dose without increasing the dose to the urethra and other organs at risk should be a focus for future research, as we have shown that a focal boost is beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Schie
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- University Medical Center, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- University Medical Center, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris J Pos
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sofie Isebaert
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Delombaerde L, Depuydt T. PO-1728 Optimal camera setup for SGRT system on a ProteusOne proton therapy system, a simulation study. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08179-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
12
|
De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Dewit B, Draulans C, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Automated treatment planning of prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with focal boosting on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: Plan quality comparison with C-arm linacs. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:59-72. [PMID: 34318996 PMCID: PMC8425873 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The integration of auto‐segmentation and automated treatment planning methods on a fast‐rotating O‐ring linac may improve the time efficiency of online adaptive radiotherapy workflows. This study investigates whether automated treatment planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the O‐ring linac could generate plans that are of similar quality as those obtained through manual planning on clinical C‐arm linacs. Methods For 20 men with prostate cancer, reference treatment plans were generated on a TrueBeam STx C‐arm linac with HD120 MLC and a TrueBeam C‐arm linac with Millennium 120 MLC using 6 MV flattened dual arc VMAT. Manual planning on the Halcyon fast‐rotating O‐ring linac was performed using 6 MV FFF dual arc VMAT (HA2‐DL10) and triple arc VMAT (HA3‐DL10) to investigate the performance of the dual‐layer MLC system. Automated planning was performed for triple arc VMAT on the Halcyon linac (ET3‐DL10) using the automated planning algorithms of Ethos Treatment Planning. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate and 30 Gy to the seminal vesicles in five fractions. The iso‐toxic focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor nodule(s) was aimed to receive up to 50 Gy. Plan deliverability was verified using portal image dosimetry measurements. Results Compared to the C‐arm linacs, ET3‐DL10 shows increased seminal vesicles PTV coverage (D99%) and reduced high‐dose spillage to the bladder (V37Gy) and urethra (D0.035cc) but this came at the cost of increased high‐dose spillage to the rectum (V38Gy) and a higher intermediate dose spillage (D2cm). No statistically significant differences were found when benchmarking HA2‐DL10 and HA3‐DL10 with the C‐arm linacs. All plans passed the patient‐specific QA tolerance limit. Conclusions Automated planning of prostate SBRT with focal boosting on the fast‐rotating O‐ring linac is feasible and achieves similar plan quality as those obtained on clinical C‐arm linacs using manual planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Dewit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Groen VH, Zuithoff NPA, van Schie M, Monninkhof EM, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer HCJ, van der Voort van Zyp J, Pos FJ, Smeenk RJ, Haustermans K, Isebaert S, Draulans C, Depuydt T, Verkooijen HM, van der Heide UA, Kerkmeijer LGW. Anorectal dose-effect relations for late gastrointestinal toxicity following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:98-104. [PMID: 34214614 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The phase III FLAME trial (NCT01168479) showed an increase in five-year biochemical disease-free survival, with no significant increase in toxicity when adding a focal boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer [Kerkmeijer et al. JCO 2021]. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between delivered radiation dose to the anorectum and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (grade ≥2). MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients in the FLAME trial were analyzed, irrespective of treatment arm. The dose-effect relation of the anorectal dose parameters (D2cm3 and D50%) and GI toxicity grade ≥2 in four years of follow-up was assessed using a mixed model analysis for repeated measurements, adjusted for age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, T-stage, baseline toxicity grade ≥1, hormonal therapy and institute. RESULTS A dose-effect relation for D2cm3 and D50% was observed with adjusted odds ratios of 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21, p < 0.0001) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.14-1.25, p < 0.0001) for GI toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION Although there was no difference in toxicity between study arms, a higher radiation dose to the anorectum was associated with a statistically significant increase in GI toxicity following EBRT for prostate cancer. This dose-effect relation was present for both large and small anorectal volumes. Therefore, further increase in dose to the anorectum should be weighed against the benefit of focal dose escalation for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P A Zuithoff
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel van Schie
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans C J de Boer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sofie Isebaert
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Belgium
| | | | - Tom Depuydt
- University Hospitals Leuven, Radiation Oncology, Belgium
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dewit B, De Brabandere M, Nulens A, Christiaens M, Crijns W, Depuydt T. OC-0021 End-to-end verification of 3D printed applicators for HDR skin brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06274-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
15
|
Skouboe S, De Roover R, Gammelmark Muurholm C, Ravkilde T, Crijns W, Hansen R, Depuydt T, Poulsen PR. Six degrees of freedom dynamic motion-including dose reconstruction in a commercial treatment planning system. Med Phys 2021; 48:1427-1435. [PMID: 33415778 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intrafractional motion during radiotherapy delivery can deteriorate the delivered dose. Dynamic rotational motion of up to 38 degrees has been reported during prostate cancer radiotherapy, but methods to determine the dosimetric consequences of such rotations are lacking. Here, we create and experimentally validate a dose reconstruction method that accounts for dynamic rotations and translations in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Interplay effects are quantified by comparing dose reconstructions with dynamic and constant rotations. METHODS The dose reconstruction accumulates the dose in points of interest while the points are moved in six degrees of freedom (6DoF) in a precalculated time-resolved four-dimensional (4D) dose matrix to emulate dynamic motion in a patient. The required 4D dose matrix was generated by splitting the original treatment plan into multiple sub-beams, each representing 0.4 s dose delivery, and recalculating the dose of the split plan in the TPS (Eclipse). The dose accumulation was performed via TPS scripting by querying the dose of each sub-beam in dynamically moving points, allowing dose reconstruction with any dynamic motion. The dose reconstruction was validated with film dosimetry for two prostate dual arc VMAT plans with intra-prostatic lesion boosts. The plans were delivered to a pelvis phantom with internal dynamic rotational motion of a film stack (21 films with 2.5 mm separation). Each plan was delivered without motion and with three prostate motion traces. Motion-including dose reconstruction was performed for each motion experiment using the actual dynamic rotation as well as a constant rotation equal to the mean rotation during the experiment. For each experiment, the 3%/2 mm γ failure rate of the TPS dose reconstruction was calculated with the film measurement being the reference. For each motion experiment, the motion-induced 3%/2 mm γ failure rate was calculated using the static delivery as the reference and compared between film measurements and TPS dose reconstruction. DVH metrics for RT structures fully contained in the film volume were also compared between film and TPS. RESULTS The mean γ failure rate of the TPS dose reconstructions when compared to film doses was 0.8% (two static experiments) and 1.7% (six dynamic experiments). The mean (range) of the motion-induced γ failure rate in film measurements was 35.4% (21.3-59.2%). The TPS dose reconstruction agreed with these experimental γ failure rates with root-mean-square errors of 2.1% (dynamic rotation dose reconstruction) and 17.1% (dose reconstruction assuming constant rotation). By DVH metrics, the mean (range) difference between dose reconstructions with dynamic and constant rotation was 4.3% (-0.3-10.6%) (urethra D 2 % ), -0.6% (-5.6%-2.5%) (urethra D 99 % ), 1.1% (-7.1-7.7%) (GTV D 2 % ), -1.4% (-17.4-7.1%) (GTV D 95 % ), -1.2% (-17.1-5.7%) (GTV D 99 % ), and -0.1% (-3.2-7.6%) (GTV mean dose). Dose reconstructions with dynamic motion revealed large interplay effects (cold and hot spots). CONCLUSIONS A method to perform dose reconstructions for dynamic 6DoF motion in a TPS was developed and experimentally validated. It revealed large differences in dose distribution between dynamic and constant rotations not identifiable through dose reconstructions with constant rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Skouboe
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Thomas Ravkilde
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rune Hansen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Delombaerde L, Petillion S, Weltens C, Depuydt T. Spirometer-guided breath-hold breast VMAT verified with portal images and surface tracking. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:78-84. [PMID: 33515669 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Fast rotating closed-bore gantry linacs are ideally suited for breath-hold treatments due to reduced imaging and delivery times. We evaluated the reproducibility and stability of spirometer-guided breath-hold breast treatments, using intra-bore surface monitoring and portal imaging on Halcyon (Varian Medical Systems). MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven left-sided breast cancer patients were treated in breath-hold using the SDX spirometer (Dyn'R) with an integrated boost volumetric arc protocol on Halcyon. A dual depth-camera surface scanning system monitored the left breast. The interfraction, intrafraction and intrabreath-hold motion was determined in the anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction. Portal images (PI), acquired at a tangential gantry angle were manually registered to the planning-CT to determine inter- and intrafraction breath-hold errors for the SI and tangential-anterior-posterior ("AP") axis. Correlations between PI and surface imaging deviations were investigated. To evaluate workflow efficiency, the total time and the number of breath-holds were recorded. RESULTS Systematic and random variability of breath-hold amplitude was below 0.7 mm for the AP and below 1.2 mm for the SI component as detected by surface monitoring (N = 130). Systematic and random errors retrieved from portal images (N = 140) were below 1.2 mm for the "AP" and 2.1 mm for SI axis. A limited correlation was found between PI and surface monitoring deviations for both the SI and "AP" axes (R2 = 0.27/0.38, p < 0.01). 75% of fractions were completed using four breath-holds and 82% within 10 min. CONCLUSION Surface imaging indicated spirometer-guided breath-hold VMAT breast radiotherapy can be accurately and quickly performed on a closed-bore gantry linac. Intra-bore surface scanning proved a valuable technique for monitoring breathing motion in closed-bore systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Delombaerde
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
De Roover R, Hansen R, Crijns W, Muurholm CG, Poels K, Skouboe S, Haustermans K, Poulsen PR, Depuydt T. Dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate rotation and accuracy of gating, multi-leaf collimator tracking and couch tracking to manage rotation: An end-to-end validation using volumetric film measurements. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:10-18. [PMID: 33264640 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Both gating and tracking can mitigate the deteriorating dosimetric impact of intrafraction translation during prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, their ability to manage intrafraction rotation has not yet been thoroughly investigated. The dosimetric accuracy of gating, MLC tracking and couch tracking to manage intrafraction prostate rotation was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans for end-to-end tests of prostate SBRT with focal boosting were generated for a dynamic anthropomorphic pelvis phantom. The phantom applied internal lateral rotation (up to 25°) and coupled vertical and longitudinal translation of a radiochromic film stack that was used for dose measurements. Dose was delivered for each plan while the phantom applied motion according to three typical prostate motion traces without compensation (i), with gating (ii), with MLC tracking (iii) or with couch tracking (iv). Measured doses for the four motion compensation strategies were compared with the planned dose in terms of γ-index analysis, target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing. RESULTS Intrafraction rotation reduced the 3%(global)/2mm γ-index passing rate (γPR) for the prostate target volume by median (range) -33.2% (-68.6%, -4.1%) when no motion compensation was applied. The use of motion compensation improved the γPR by 13.2% (-0.4%, 32.9%) for gating, by 6.0% (-0.8%, 27.7%) for MLC tracking and by 11.1% (1.2%, 22.9%) for couch tracking. The three compensation techniques improved the target coverage in most cases. Gating showed better OAR sparing than MLC tracking or couch tracking. CONCLUSIONS Compensation of intrafraction prostate rotation with gating, MLC tracking and couch tracking was investigated experimentally for the first time. All three techniques improved the dosimetric accuracy, but residual motion-related dose errors remained due to the lack of rotation correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Rune Hansen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Simon Skouboe
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Deffet S, Cohilis M, Souris K, Salvo K, Depuydt T, Sterpin E, Macq B. openPR - A computational tool for CT conversion assessment with proton radiography. Med Phys 2020; 48:387-396. [PMID: 33125725 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE One of the main sources of uncertainty in proton therapy is the conversion of the Hounsfield Units of the planning CT to (relative) proton stopping powers. Proton radiography provides range error maps but these can be affected by other sources of errors as well as the CT conversion (e.g., residual misalignment). To better understand and quantify range uncertainty, it is desirable to measure the individual contributions and particularly those associated to the CT conversion. METHODS A workflow is proposed to carry out an assessment of the CT conversion solely on the basis of proton radiographs of real tissues measured with a multilayer ionization chamber (MLIC). The workflow consists of a series of four stages: (a) CT and proton radiography acquisitions, (b) CT and proton radiography registration in postprocessing, (c) sample-specific validation of the semi-empirical model both used in the registration and to estimate the water equivalent path length (WEPL), and (d) WEPL error estimation. The workflow was applied to a pig head as part of the validation of the CT calibration of the proton therapy center PARTICLE at UZ Leuven, Belgium. RESULTS The CT conversion-related uncertainty computed based on the well-established safety margin rule of 1.2 mm + 2.4% were overestimated by 71% on the pig head. However, the range uncertainty was very much underestimated where cavities were encountered by the protons. Excluding areas with cavities, the overestimation of the uncertainty was 500%. A correlation was found between these localized errors and HUs between -1000 and -950, suggesting that the underestimation was not a consequence of an inaccurate conversion but was probably rather due to the resolution of the CT leading to material mixing at interfaces. To reduce these errors, the CT calibration curve was adapted by increasing the HU interval corresponding to the air up to -950. CONCLUSION The application of the workflow as part of the validation of the CT conversion to RSPs showed an overall overestimation of the expected uncertainty. Moreover, the largest WEPL errors were found to be related to the presence of cavities which nevertheless are associated with low WEPL values. This suggests that the use of this workflow on patients or in a generalized study on different types of animal tissues could shed sufficient light on how the contributions to the CT conversion-related uncertainty add up to potentially reduce up to several millimeters the uncertainty estimations taken into account in treatment planning. All the algorithms required to perform the workflow were implemented in the computational tool named openPR which is part of openREGGUI, an open-source image processing platform for adaptive proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Deffet
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
| | - Marie Cohilis
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Universitécatholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
| | - Kevin Souris
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Universitécatholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
| | - Koen Salvo
- Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Universitécatholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Benoit Macq
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, 1348, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Groen V, Zuithoff P, Van Schie M, Monninkhof E, Kunze-Busch M, De Boer H, Van der Voort van Zijp J, Pos F, Smeenk R, Haustermans K, Isebaert S, Depuydt T, Verkooijen H, Van der Heide U, Kerkmeijer L. PH-0114: Dose-volume effects for GI toxicity following EBRT for prostate cancer in the FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00140-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
20
|
De Roover R, Hansen R, Crijns W, Muurholm C, Poels K, Skouboe S, Haustermans K, Poulsen P, Depuydt T. PO-1591: Dosimetric accuracy of beam gating, MLC tracking and couch tracking to manage prostate rotation. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01609-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Skouboe S, De Roover R, Muurholm C, Crijns W, Ravkilde T, Hansen R, Depuydt T, Poulsen P. OC-0704: Six degrees of freedom dynamic motion-including dose reconstruction in a treatment planning system. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00726-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
22
|
Delombaerde L, Depuydt T, Berkovic P, Lambrecht M. PO-1617: PO-1617 Feasibility of spirometer-guided single breath-hold kV-CBCTs on Halcyon in lung cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
23
|
Muurholm C, Ravkilde T, De Roover R, Skouboe S, Hansen R, Crijns W, Keall P, Depuydt T, Poulsen P. OC-0342: Experimental validation of real-time rotation-including dose reconstruction during tumor tracking. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
Delombaerde L, Petillion S, Weltens C, De Roover R, Reynders T, Depuydt T. Technical Note: Development of 3D‐printed breast phantoms for end‐to‐end testing of whole breast volumetric arc radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020. [PMCID: PMC7484846 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
End‐to‐end testing of a new breast radiotherapy technique preferably requires realistic phantom geometries, which is challenging to achieve using currently commercially available solutions. We have developed a series of three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed breast phantoms, with ionization chamber and radiochromic film inserts, which can be attached to a commercial anthropomorphic thorax phantom. A contoured left breast from a patient’s planning CT was mapped onto a CT of the CIRS E2E thorax phantom (CIRS Inc.) and cropped to fit the surface. Four versions of the breast were 3D printed, containing a cavity for an ionization chamber and slits for radiochromic film insertion in the three cardinal planes, respectively. The phantoms were fully compatible with surface scanning technology used for setup. The phantoms were validated using a whole‐breast volumetric modulated arc therapy protocol with a simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor bed (VMAT‐SIB). Six patient plans and one original plan on the breast phantom were verified with planar portal imaging, point dose, and film measurements in the MultiCube phantom and planar γ‐analysis using ArcCHECK diode array. Six patient plans were recalculated on the breast phantom (hybrid plans) and delivered with point dose and film measurements with 3% (local)/2 mm γ‐analysis. One complete end‐to‐end test on the breast phantom was performed. All plan quality verifications had point dose differences below 2.4% from the calculated dose and γ‐agreement scores (γAS) > 87.3% for film measurements in the MultiCube, portal dosimetry, and ArcCHECK. Point dose differences in the 3D‐printed phantoms were below 2.6% (median −1.4%, range −2.6%; 0.3%). Median γAS was 96.4% (range 80.1%–99.7%) for all film inserts. The proposed 3D‐printed attachable breast dosimetry phantoms have been shown to be a valuable tool for end‐to‐end testing of a new radiotherapy protocol. The workflow described in this report can aid users to create their own phantom‐specific breast 3D‐printed phantoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Oncology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - Truus Reynders
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Draulans C, De Roover R, van der Heide UA, Haustermans K, Pos F, Smeenk RJ, De Boer H, Depuydt T, Kunze-Busch M, Isebaert S, Kerkmeijer L. Stereotactic body radiation therapy with optional focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer: Topical review and multicenter consensus. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:131-142. [PMID: 31276989 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining interest by the recent publication of the first phase III trials on prostate SBRT and the promising results of many other phase II trials. Before long term results became available, the major concern for implementing SBRT in PCa in daily clinical practice was the potential risk of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. A number of recently published trials, including late outcome and toxicity data, contributed to the growing evidence for implementation of SBRT for PCa in daily clinical practice. However, there exists substantial variability in delivering SBRT for PCa. The aim of this topical review is to present a number of prospective trials and retrospective analyses of SBRT in the treatment of PCa. We focus on the treatment strategies and techniques used in these trials. In addition, recent literature on a simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor lesion, which could create an additional value in the SBRT treatment of PCa, was described. Furthermore, we discuss the multicenter consensus of the FLAME consortium on SBRT for PCa with a focal boost to the macroscopic intraprostatic tumor nodule(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Draulans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Robin De Roover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans De Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Linda Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
De Roover R, Berghen C, De Meerleer G, Depuydt T, Crijns W. Extended field radiotherapy measurements in a single shot using a BaFBr-based OSL-film. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:165007. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2eff] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
27
|
den Hartogh MD, de Boer HC, de Groot-van Breugel EN, van der Voort van Zyp JR, Hes J, van der Heide UA, Pos F, Haustermans K, Depuydt T, Jan Smeenk R, Kunze-Busch M, Raaymakers BW, Kerkmeijer LG. Planning feasibility of extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 11:16-20. [PMID: 33458271 PMCID: PMC7807729 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recently, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients have been treated in a multicenter phase II trial with extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy (hypo-FLAME trial). The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator (MRI-linac) could achieve complex dose distributions of a quality similar to conventional linac state-of-the-art prostate treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS The clinically delivered treatment plans of 20 hypo-FLAME patients (volumetric modulated arc therapy, 10 MV, 5 mm leaf width) were included. Prescribed dose to the prostate was 5 × 7 Gy, with a focal tumor boost up to 5 × 10 Gy. MRI-linac treatment plans (intensity modulated radiotherapy, 7 MV, 7 mm leaf width, fixed collimator angle and 1.5 T magnetic field) were calculated. Dose distributions were compared. RESULTS In both conventional and MRI-linac treatment plans, the V35Gy to the whole prostate was >99% in all patients. Mean dose to the gross tumor volume was 45 Gy for conventional and 44 Gy for MRI-linac plans, respectively. Organ at risk doses were met in the majority of plans, except for a rectal V35Gy constraint, which was exceeded in one patient, by 1 cc, for both modalities. The bladder V32Gy and V28Gy constraints were exceeded in two and one patient respectively, for both modalities. CONCLUSION Planning of stereotactic radiotherapy with focal ablative boosting in prostate cancer on a high field MRI-linac is feasible with the current MRI-linac properties, without deterioration of plan quality compared to conventional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariska D. den Hartogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans C.J. de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jochem Hes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda G.W. Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kindts I, Defraene G, Petillion S, Janssen H, Van Limbergen E, Depuydt T, Weltens C. Validation of a normal tissue complication probability model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:448-455. [PMID: 30638097 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1548775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome (AO) after breast-conserving therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS The BCCT.core software evaluated the AO using standardized photographs of patients treated at the University Hospitals Leuven between April 2015 and April 2016. Dose maps in 2 Gy equivalents were calculated assuming α/β = 3.6 Gy. The discriminating ability of the model was described by the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve. A 95% confidence interval (CI) of AUC was calculated using 10,000 bootstrap replications. Calibration was evaluated with the calibration plot and Nagelkerke R2. Patients with unfavourable AO at baseline were excluded. Patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were compared between the development and the validation cohort. The prognostic value of the characteristics in the validation cohort was further evaluated in univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS Out of 175 included patients, 166 were evaluated two years after RT and 44 (26.51%) had unfavourable AO. AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.56; 0.76). Calibration was moderate with small overestimations at higher risk. When applying all of the univariable significant clinicopathological and dosimetrical variables from the validation cohort in a multivariable model, the presence of a seroma and V45 were selected as significant risk factors for unfavourable AO (Odds Ratio 4.40 (95% CI 1.96; 9.86) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.03; 1.27), p-value <.001 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The NTCP model for unfavourable AO shows a moderate discrimination and calibration in the present prospective validation cohort with a small overestimation in the high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kindts
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Janssen
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Michiels S, Nulens A, Vanstraelen B, Petillion S, De Brabandere M, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast‐rotating O‐ring linac system. Med Phys 2018; 46:328-339. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Department of Oncology Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy KU Leuven – University of Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Oncology Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy KU Leuven – University of Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Steven Michiels
- Department of Oncology Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy KU Leuven – University of Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - An Nulens
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Bianca Vanstraelen
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Marisol De Brabandere
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy KU Leuven – University of Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy KU Leuven – University of Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 B‐3000 Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Michiels S, Mangelschots B, Roover RD, Devroye C, Depuydt T. Production of patient-specific electron beam aperture cut-outs using a low-cost, multi-purpose 3D printer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:756-760. [PMID: 30047204 PMCID: PMC6123127 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Electron beam collimators for non‐standard field sizes and shapes are typically fabricated using Styrofoam molds to cast the aperture cut‐out. These molds are often produced using a dedicated foam cutter, which may be expensive and only serves a single purpose. An increasing number of radiotherapy departments, however, has a 3D printer on‐site, to create a wide range of custom‐made treatment auxiliaries, such as bolus and dosimetry phantoms. The 3D printer can also be used to produce patient‐specific aperture cut‐outs, as elaborated in this note. Open‐source programming language was used to automatically generate the mold's shape in a generic digital file format readable by 3D printer software. The geometric mold model has the patient's identification number integrated and is to be mounted on a uniquely fitting, reusable positioning device, which can be 3D printed as well. This assembly likewise fits uniquely onto the applicator tray, ensuring correct and error‐free alignment of the mold during casting of the aperture. For dosimetric verification, two aperture cut‐outs were cast, one using a conventionally cut Styrofoam mold and one using a 3D printed mold. Using these cut‐outs, the clinical plan was delivered onto a phantom, for which the transversal dose distributions were measured at 2 cm depth using radiochromic film and compared using gamma‐index analysis. An agreement score of 99.9% between the measured 2D dose distributions was found in the (10%–80%) dose region, using 1% (local) dose‐difference and 1.0 mm distance‐to‐agreement acceptance criteria. The workflow using 3D printing has been clinically implemented and is in routine use at the author's institute for all patient‐specific electron beam aperture cut‐outs. It allows for a standardized, cost‐effective, and operator‐friendly workflow without the need for dedicated equipment. In addition, it offers possibilities to increase safety and quality of the process including patient identification and methods for accurate mold alignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Michiels
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bram Mangelschots
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robin De Roover
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cédric Devroye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kindts I, Defraene G, Laenen A, Petillion S, Van Limbergen E, Depuydt T, Weltens C. Development of a normal tissue complication probability model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:916-923. [PMID: 29652212 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1461926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To develop a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for late unfavourable aesthetic outcome (AO) after breast-conserving therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS The BCCT.core software evaluated the AO using standardized photographs of patients treated between 2009 and 2014. Dose maps in 2 Gy equivalents were calculated assuming α/β = 3.6 Gy. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to study the predictive value of clinicopathological and dosimetric variables for unfavourable AO. The Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) model was fit to the data with dose modifying factors (dmf). Model performance was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and bootstrap sampling. RESULTS Forty-four of the 121 analysed patients (36%) developed unfavourable AO. In the optimal multivariable logistic regression model, a larger breast volume receiving ≥55 Gy (V55), a seroma and an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were independently associated with an unfavourable AO, AUC = 0.75 (95%CI 0.64;0.85). Beta-estimates were -2.68 for β0, 0.057 for V55, 1.55 for seroma and 1.20 for ALND. The optimal LKB model parameters were EUD3.6(50) = 63.3 Gy, n = 1.00, m = 0.23, dmf(seroma) = 0.83 and dmf(ALND) = 0.84, AUC = 0.74 (95%CI 0.61;0.83). CONCLUSIONS An NTCP model for late unfavourable AO after breast-conserving therapy was developed including seroma, axillary lymphadenectomy and V55.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kindts
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gilles Defraene
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-Biostat), KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Michiels S, Barragán AM, Souris K, Poels K, Crijns W, Lee JA, Sterpin E, Nuyts S, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:161-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
The use of proton therapy as a treatment modality is becoming more widespread in conventional radiation therapy practice. Commercialisation and introduction of compact systems has led to embedding of proton therapy facilities in existing hospital environments. In addition, technologically, proton therapy is currently undergoing an important evolution, moving from passive scattering delivery techniques to active pencil beam scanning, adopting image guidance techniques from conventional radiotherapy and introducing various range verification techniques in the clinic. An overview is given of today's technological evolution of proton therapy in clinical environments, and its impact on aspects of radiation protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Depuydt
- a UZ Leuven, Belgium
- b Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, Leuven, B3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
De Roover R, Crijns W, Poels K, Peeters R, Draulans C, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Characterization of a novel liquid fiducial marker for multimodal image guidance in stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Med Phys 2018. [PMID: 29537613 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Liquid fiducial markers have shown to be a promising alternative to solid gold markers in terms of imaging artifact reduction, patient comfort, and compatibility with different imaging modalities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the novel BioXmark® liquid marker for state-of-the-art multimodal imaging used in prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy, encompassing kV CT/CBCT, multiparametric MRI, and kV x-ray imaging. In addition, automatic detection of the liquid markers in x-ray imaging for prostate motion monitoring during treatment was investigated. METHODS A total of eight BioXmark® liquid markers with varying volumes (range 5-300 μL) were casted on a square grid into a gelatin phantom insert. A cylindrical gold marker (QLRAD, length = 7 mm, Ø = 1 mm) was inserted for reference. Liquid marker visibility and streaking artifacts in CT/CBCT imaging were evaluated by placing the gelatin phantom into a CIRS anthropomorphic phantom. Relevant MRI characteristics such as the T2 and T1 relaxation times, the ADC value, and the relative proton density (ρH) were quantified by placing the gelatin phantom insert next to a T1MES mapping phantom and a water-filled syringe for reference. Ex vivo multiparametric MRI images were acquired by placing the gelatin phantom next to a resected prostate specimen. Anterior-posterior x-ray projection images were obtained by placing the gelatin phantom insert on top of an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom with internal pelvic bony structures and were acquired for five positions relative to the bony anatomy and 24 clinically relevant x-ray exposure settings. To quantify individual automatic marker detection, single markers were artificially isolated in the x-ray images using postprocessing. RESULTS Markers of all sizes were clearly visible on CT and CBCT images with only the largest marker volumes (100-300 μL) displaying artifacts similar in size to the gold fiducial marker. Artifact size increased with increasing liquid marker volume. Liquid markers displayed good contrast in ex vivo T1-weighted and ρH-weighted images. The markers were not visible in the ex vivo T2-weighted image. The liquid markers induced a chemical shift artifact in the obtained ADC-map. Automated detection in x-ray imaging was feasible with high detection success (four of five positions) for marker volumes in the range of 25-200 μL. None of the liquid markers were detected successfully when superimposed on a bony edge, independent of their size. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to show the compatibility of BioXmark® liquid markers with multimodal image-guided radiotherapy for PCa. Compared to a solid gold marker, they had favorable results in both visibility and induced imaging artifacts. Liquid marker visibility in MRI imaging of the prostate does not solely depend on the low ρH value (not visible on T2-weighted image) but is also influenced by its relaxation times. Automated marker detection in x-ray images was feasible but better adapted marker detection algorithms are necessary for marker localization in the presence of bony edges. Hence, the liquid marker provides a minimally invasive (fine needles) and highly applicable alternative to current solid gold markers for multimodal image-guided prostate radiotherapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin De Roover
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Ronald Peeters
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Delombaerde L, Petillion S, Depuydt T. EP-2051: Surface scanner camera position optimization on the Varian Halcyon TM O-ring gantry linac system. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)32360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
36
|
Michiels S, Mangelschots B, Devroye C, Depuydt T. EP-2182: Use of 3D printing to generate patient-specific electron beam aperture blocks. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)32491-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Michiels S, Poels K, Crijns W, Vanstraelen B, Haustermans K, Nuyts S, Depuydt T. OC-0514: VMAT treatment planning for head-and-neck cancer with the novel fast-rotating linac halcyon. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30824-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
38
|
De Roover R, Poels K, Crijns W, Nulens A, Vanstraelen B, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. PO-1008: Commissioning of IMRT/VMAT on the novel Varian Halcyon™. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)31318-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
39
|
Kindts I, Laenen A, Depuydt T, Weltens C. Tumor bed boost after whole-breast irradiation in breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Eur J Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(18)30394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Kindts I, Defraene G, Laenen A, Petillion S, Van Limbergen E, Depuydt T, Weltens C. PV-0316: Development of a prediction model for unfavourable aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30626-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
41
|
Depuydt T. SP-0243: A bright future for the PTV?: gating, tracking, on-line re-planning. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30553-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
42
|
Lin H, Liu T, Shi C, Petillion S, Kindts I, Weltens C, Depuydt T, Song Y, Saleh Z, Xu XG, Tang X. Feasibility study of individualized optimal positioning selection for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy: DIBH or prone. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:218-229. [PMID: 29436168 PMCID: PMC5849849 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and prone (P) position are two common heart-sparing techniques for external-beam radiation treatment of left-sided breast cancer patients. Clinicians select the position that is deemed to be better for tissue sparing based on their experience. This approach, however, is not always optimum and consistent. In response to this, we develop a quantitative tool that predicts the optimal positioning for the sake of organs at risk (OAR) sparing. Sixteen left-sided breast cancer patients were considered in the study, each received CT scans in the supine free breathing, supine DIBH, and prone positions. Treatment plans were generated for all positions. A patient was classified as DIBH or P using two different criteria: if that position yielded (1) lower heart dose, or (2) lower weighted OAR dose. Ten anatomical features were extracted from each patient's data, followed by the principal component analysis. Sequential forward feature selection was implemented to identify features that give the best classification performance. Nine statistical models were then applied to predict the optimal positioning and were evaluated using stratified k-fold cross-validation, predictive accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). For heart toxicity-based classification, the support vector machine with radial basis function kernel yielded the highest accuracy (0.88) and AUROC (0.80). For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, the quadratic discriminant analysis achieved the highest accuracy (0.90) and AUROC (0.84). For heart toxicity-based classification, Breast volume and the distance between Heart and Breast were the most frequently selected features. For OAR overall toxicities-based classification, Heart volume, Breast volume and the distance between ipsilateral lung and breast were frequently selected. Given the patient data considered in this study, the proposed statistical model is feasible to provide predictions for DIBH and prone position selection as well as indicate important clinical features that affect the position selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Lin
- Nuclear Engineering and Engineering PhysicsRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
| | - Tianyu Liu
- Nuclear Engineering and Engineering PhysicsRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Saskia Petillion
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Isabelle Kindts
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Yulin Song
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Ziad Saleh
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Xie George Xu
- Nuclear Engineering and Engineering PhysicsRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
| | - Xiaoli Tang
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Willems S, Crijns W, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Van Der Veen J, Robben D, Depuydt T, Nuyts S, Haustermans K, Maes F. Clinical Implementation of DeepVoxNet for Auto-Delineation of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck Cancer Patients in Radiotherapy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01201-4_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast-conserving therapy, involving breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation and optionally a boost to the tumour bed, is a standard therapeutic option for women with early-stage breast cancer. A boost to the tumour bed means that an extra dose of radiation is applied that covers the initial tumour site. The rationale for a boost of radiotherapy to the tumour bed is that (i) local recurrence occurs mostly at the site of the primary tumour because remaining microscopic tumour cells are most likely situated there; and (ii) radiation can eliminate these causative microscopic tumour cells. The boost continues to be used in women at high risk of local recurrence, but is less widely accepted for women at lower risk. Reasons for questioning the boost are twofold. Firstly, the boost brings higher treatment costs. Secondly, the potential adverse events are not negligible. In this Cochrane Review, we investigated the effect of the tumour bed boost on local control and side effects. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of tumour bed boost radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (January 1966 to 1 March 2017), Embase (1980 to 1 March 2017), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov on 1 March 2017. We also searched the European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology Annual Meeting, the St Gallen Oncology Conferences, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting for abstracts. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing the addition and the omission of breast cancer tumour bed boost radiotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (IK and CW) performed data extraction and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's 'Risk of bias' tool, resolving any disagreements through discussion. We entered data into Review Manager 5 for analysis and applied GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 5 randomised controlled trials analysing a total of 8325 women.Local control appeared to be better for women receiving a tumour bed boost compared to no tumour bed boost (hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.75; 5 studies, 8315 women, low-quality evidence). Overall survival did not differ with or without a tumour bed boost (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14; 2 studies, 6342 women, moderate-quality evidence). Disease-free survival did not differ with or without a tumour bed boost (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.02; 3 studies, 6549 women, low-quality evidence). Late toxicity scored by means of percentage of breast retraction assessment did not differ with or without a tumour bed boost (mean difference 0.38, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.93; 2 studies, 1526 women, very low-quality evidence). Cosmesis scored by a panel was better (i.e. excellent or good compared to fair or poor) in the no-boost group (odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.85; 2 studies, 1116 women, low-quality evidence). Cosmesis scored by a physician did not differ with or without a tumour bed boost (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.69; 2 studies, 592 women, very low-quality evidence).We excluded two studies in a sensitivity analysis of local recurrence (because the biological equivalent dose (BED) to the tumour bed was lower, in situ tumours were included, or there was a high risk of selective reporting bias or blinding of outcome assessment bias), which resulted in a HR of 0.62 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73; 3 studies, 6963 women, high-quality evidence). Subgroup analysis including women older than 40 years of age yielded a HR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.81; 2 studies, 5058 women, high-quality evidence).We found no data for the outcomes of acute toxicity, quality of life, or costs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS It appears that local control rates are increased with the boost to the tumour bed, but we found no evidence of a benefit for other oncological outcomes. Subgroup analysis including women older than 40 years of age yielded similarly significant results. Objective percentage of breast retraction assessment appears similar between groups. It appears that the cosmetic outcome is worse with the boost to the tumour bed, but only when measured by a panel, not when assessed by a physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Kindts
- University Hospitals LeuvenDepartment of Radiation OncologyLeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- KULeuvenLeuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatices CentreLeuvenBelgium3500
| | - Tom Depuydt
- University Hospitals LeuvenDepartment of Radiation OncologyLeuvenBelgium3000
| | - Caroline Weltens
- University Hospitals LeuvenDepartment of Radiation OncologyLeuvenBelgium3000
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kindts I, Defraene G, Laenen A, Petillion S, van Limbergen E, Depuydt T, Weltens C. Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modeling of Long-Term Aesthetic Outcome After Breast-Conserving Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Callens MB, Crijns W, Depuydt T, Haustermans K, Maes F, D’Agostino E, Wevers M, Pfeiffer H, Van Den Abeele K. Modeling the dose dependence of the vis-absorption spectrum of EBT3 GafChromic™ films. Med Phys 2017; 44:2532-2543. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten B. Callens
- Wave Propagation and Signal Processing; KU Leuven - KULAK; Kortrijk 8500 Belgium
| | - Wouter Crijns
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven 3000 Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven 3000 Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven 3000 Belgium
| | - Frederik Maes
- Department of Electrical Engineering; ESAT/PSI, KU Leuven; Leuven 3001 Belgium
| | | | - Martine Wevers
- Department of Materials Engineering; KU Leuven; Leuven 3001 Belgium
| | - Helge Pfeiffer
- Department of Materials Engineering; KU Leuven; Leuven 3001 Belgium
| | - Koen Van Den Abeele
- Wave Propagation and Signal Processing; KU Leuven - KULAK; Kortrijk 8500 Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Habraken S, Sharfo A, Buijsen J, Verbakel W, Haasbeek C, Ollers M, Westerveld G, Van Wieringen N, Reerink O, Seravalli E, Braam P, Wendling M, Lacornerie T, Mirabel X, Weytjens R, Depuydt L, Lang S, Riesterer O, Haustermans K, Depuydt T, Heijmen B, Méndez Romero A. OC-0541: Automated treatment planning for prospective QA in the TRENDY randomized trial on liver-SBRT for HCC. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30981-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
48
|
Michiels S, Barragán A, Souris K, Poels K, Crijns W, Lee J, Sterpin E, Nuyts S, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. EP-1590: Can bolus range shifting improve plan quality in the IMPT of head and neck cancer? Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)32025-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
49
|
De Saint-Hubert M, Verellen D, Poels K, Crijns W, Magliona F, Depuydt T, Vanhavere F, Struelens L. Out-of-field doses from pediatric craniospinal irradiations using 3D-CRT, IMRT, helical tomotherapy and electron-based therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:5293-5311. [PMID: 28398210 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6c9e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma treatment involves irradiation of the entire central nervous system, i.e. craniospinal irradiation (CSI). This is associated with the significant exposure of large volumes of healthy tissue and there is growing concern regarding treatment-associated side effects. The current study compares out-of-field organ doses in children receiving CSI through 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT) and an electron-based technique, and includes radiation doses resulting from imaging performed during treatment. An extensive phantom study is performed, using an anthropomorphic phantom corresponding to a five year old child, in which organ absorbed doses are measured using thermoluminescent detectors. Additionally, the study evaluates and explores tools for calculating out-of-field patient doses using the treatment planning system (TPS) and analytical models. In our study, 3D-CRT resulted in very high doses to a limited number of organs, while it was able to spare organs such as the lungs and breast when compared to IMRT and HT. Both IMRT and HT spread the dose over more organs and were able to spare the heart, thyroid, bladder, uterus and testes when compared to 3D-CRT. The electron-based technique considerably decreased the out-of-field doses in deep-seated organs but could not avoid nearby out-of-field organs such as the lungs, ribs, adrenals, kidneys and uterus. The daily imaging dose is small compared to the treatment dose burden. The TPS error for out-of-field doses was most pronounced for organs further away from the target; nevertheless, no systematic underestimation was observed for any of the studied TPS systems. Finally, analytical modeling was most optimal for 3D-CRT although the number of organs that could be modeled was limited. To conclude, none of the techniques studied was capable of sparing all organs from out-of-field doses. Nevertheless, the electron-based technique showed the most promise for out-of-field organ dose reduction during CSI when compared to photon techniques.
Collapse
|
50
|
Michiels S, D'Hollander A, Lammens N, Kersemans M, Zhang G, Denis JM, Poels K, Sterpin E, Nuyts S, Haustermans K, Depuydt T. Towards 3D printed multifunctional immobilization for proton therapy: Initial materials characterization. Med Phys 2016; 43:5392. [PMID: 27782703 DOI: 10.1118/1.4962033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE 3D printing technology is investigated for the purpose of patient immobilization during proton therapy. It potentially enables a merge of patient immobilization, bolus range shifting, and other functions into one single patient-specific structure. In this first step, a set of 3D printed materials is characterized in detail, in terms of structural and radiological properties, elemental composition, directional dependence, and structural changes induced by radiation damage. These data will serve as inputs for the design of 3D printed immobilization structure prototypes. METHODS Using four different 3D printing techniques, in total eight materials were subjected to testing. Samples with a nominal dimension of 20 × 20 × 80 mm3 were 3D printed. The geometrical printing accuracy of each test sample was measured with a dial gage. To assess the mechanical response of the samples, standardized compression tests were performed to determine the Young's modulus. To investigate the effect of radiation on the mechanical response, the mechanical tests were performed both prior and after the administration of clinically relevant dose levels (70 Gy), multiplied with a safety factor of 1.4. Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) methods were used to calculate the relative electron density to water ρe, the effective atomic number Zeff, and the proton stopping power ratio (SPR) to water SPR. In order to validate the DECT based calculation of radiological properties, beam measurements were performed on the 3D printed samples as well. Photon irradiations were performed to measure the photon linear attenuation coefficients, while proton irradiations were performed to measure the proton range shift of the samples. The directional dependence of these properties was investigated by performing the irradiations for different orientations of the samples. RESULTS The printed test objects showed reduced geometric printing accuracy for 2 materials (deviation > 0.25 mm). Compression tests yielded Young's moduli ranging from 0.6 to 2940 MPa. No deterioration in the mechanical response was observed after exposure of the samples to 100 Gy in a therapeutic MV photon beam. The DECT-based characterization yielded Zeff ranging from 5.91 to 10.43. The SPR and ρe both ranged from 0.6 to 1.22. The measured photon attenuation coefficients at clinical energies scaled linearly with ρe. Good agreement was seen between the DECT estimated SPR and the measured range shift, except for the higher Zeff. As opposed to the photon attenuation, the proton range shifting appeared to be printing orientation dependent for certain materials. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the first step toward 3D printed, multifunctional immobilization was performed, by going through a candidate clinical workflow for the first time: from the material printing to DECT characterization with a verification through beam measurements. Besides a proof of concept for beam modification, the mechanical response of printed materials was also investigated to assess their capabilities for positioning functionality. For the studied set of printing techniques and materials, a wide variety of mechanical and radiological properties can be selected from for the intended purpose. Moreover the elaborated hybrid DECT methods aid in performing in-house quality assurance of 3D printed components, as these methods enable the estimation of the radiological properties relevant for use in radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Michiels
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Antoine D'Hollander
- Department of Medical Engineering, Materialise NV, Technologielaan 15, Haasrode 3001, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Lammens
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 903, Zwijnaarde 9052, Belgium
| | - Mathias Kersemans
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 903, Zwijnaarde 9052, Belgium
| | - Guozhi Zhang
- Department of Radiology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jean-Marc Denis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Saint Luc University Clinics, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Kenneth Poels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium and Université catholique de Louvain, Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Avenue Hippocrate 54, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert 1200, Belgium
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|