1
|
Yoshimura T, Morii Y, Tamori H, Kita R, Hashimoto T, Aoyama H, Ogasawara K. Cost-effectiveness analysis for multi adverse events of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in Japan. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2025; 66:31-38. [PMID: 39562156 PMCID: PMC11753841 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
Medulloblastomas are one of the most common malignant cancers of the central nervous system in children. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is expected to provide equivalent tumor control to photon therapy while reducing the various adverse events caused by irradiation. Few studies have considered the cost-effectiveness of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma, considering the multiple adverse effects and reflecting on the latest treatment advancements. A cost-utility analysis of PBT for pediatric medulloblastoma was conducted in a Japanese setting and compared to conventional photon therapy. The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare payer's perspective, and direct costs for the treatment of radiation therapy and radiation-induced adverse events were included. A Markov model was used, and the health states of secondary cancer, hypothyroidism and hearing loss were defined as adverse events. The time horizon was the lifetime. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used as a measurement of cost-effectiveness, with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) used as an outcome. The costs were estimated from the national fee schedule, and the utility and transition probabilities were estimated from published literature. PBT incurred an additional 1387116 Japanese yen (JPY) and 1.56 QALYs to the comparator. The ICER was JPY 887053/QALY, indicating that PBT was cost-effective, based on the reference value of JPY 5 million/QALY used in the Japanese cost-effectiveness analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the ICER ranged from JPY 284782/QALY to JPY 1918603/QALY as a result of deterministic sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that PBT was cost-effective, with a probability of 91.7%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, N14-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Morii
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako 351-0197, Japan
| | - Honoka Tamori
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako 351-0197, Japan
| | - Ryuki Kita
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-868, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Ogasawara
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Graduate School of Engineering, College of Information and Systems, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto-cho, Muroran 050-8585, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshimura T, Kondo K, Hashimoto T, Nishioka K, Mori T, Kanehira T, Matsuura T, Takao S, Tamura H, Matsumoto T, Sutherland K, Aoyama H. Geometric target margin strategy of proton craniospinal irradiation for pediatric medulloblastoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:676-688. [PMID: 39278649 PMCID: PMC11420849 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
In proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for skeletally immature pediatric patients, a treatment plan should be developed to ensure that the dose is uniformly delivered to all vertebrae, considering the effects on bone growth balance. The technical (t) clinical target volume (CTV) is conventionally set by manually expanding the CTV from the entire intracranial space and thecal sac, based on the physician's experience. However, there are differences in contouring methods among physicians. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new geometric target margin strategy. Nine pediatric patients with medulloblastoma who underwent proton CSI were enrolled. We measured the following water equivalent lengths for each vertebra in each patient: body surface to the dorsal spinal canal, vertebral limbus, ventral spinal canal and spinous processes. A simulated tCTV (stCTV) was created by assigning geometric margins to the spinal canal using the measurement results such that the vertebral limb and dose distribution coincided with a margin assigned to account for the uncertainty of the proton beam range. The stCTV with a growth factor (correlation between body surface area and age) and tCTV were compared and evaluated. The median values of each index for cervical, thoracic and lumber spine were: the Hausdorff distance, 9.14, 9.84 and 9.77 mm; mean distance-to-agreement, 3.26, 2.65 and 2.64 mm; Dice coefficient, 0.84, 0.81 and 0.82 and Jaccard coefficient, 0.50, 0.60 and 0.62, respectively. The geometric target margin setting method used in this study was useful for creating an stCTV to ensure consistent and uniform planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Keigo Kondo
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takashi Mori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
- Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamura
- Department of Radiation Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Kenneth Sutherland
- Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen H, Gogineni E, Cao Y, Wong J, Deville C, Li H. Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy: Commissioning and Clinical Workflow for the Hitachi System. Int J Part Ther 2024; 11:100001. [PMID: 38757076 PMCID: PMC11095103 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe the commissioning of real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) and the establishment of an appropriate clinical workflow for the treatment of patients. Materials and Methods Hitachi PROBEAT provides pencil beam scanning proton therapy with an advanced onboard imaging system including real-time fluoroscopy. RGPT utilizes a matching score to provide instantaneous system performance feedback and quality control for patient safety. The CIRS Dynamic System combined with a Thorax Phantom or plastic water was utilized to mimic target motion. The OCTAVIUS was utilized to measure end-to-end dosimetric accuracy for a moving target across a range of simulated situations. Using this dosimetric data, the gating threshold was carefully evaluated and selected based on the intended treatment sites and planning techniques. An image-guidance workflow was developed and applied to patient treatment. Results Dosimetric data demonstrated that proton plan delivery uncertainty could be within 2 mm for a moving target. The dose delivery to a moving target could pass 3%/3 mm gamma analysis following the commissioning process and application of the clinical workflow detailed in this manuscript. A clinical workflow was established and successfully applied to patient treatment utilizing RGPT. Prostate cancer patients with implanted platinum fiducial markers were treated with RGPT. Their target motion and gating signal data were available for intrafraction motion analysis. Conclusion Real-time gated proton therapy with the Hitachi System has been fully investigated and commissioned for clinical application. RGPT can provide advanced and reliable real-time image guidance to enhance patient safety and inform important treatment planning parameters, such as planning target volume margins and uncertainty parameters for robust plan optimization. RGPT improved the treatment of patients with prostate cancer in situations where intrafraction motion is more than defined tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Chen
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emile Gogineni
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- The Ohio State University Medical School, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Yilin Cao
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Wong
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Curtiland Deville
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Heng Li
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoshimura T, Nishioka K, Hashimoto T, Seki K, Kogame S, Tanaka S, Kanehira T, Tamura M, Takao S, Matsuura T, Kobashi K, Kato F, Aoyama H, Shimizu S. A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:23-29. [PMID: 34693040 PMCID: PMC8517200 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
US-IMPT can potentially reduce the risk of genitourinary toxicities. The urethral NTCP value in US-IMPT is significantly lower than in the clinical plan. TCP for CTV did not differ significantly between the clinical and US-IMPT plans.
Background and Purpose Urethra-sparing radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer can reduce the risk of radiation-induced genitourinary toxicity by intentionally underdosing the periurethral transitional zone. We aimed to compare the clinical impact of a urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (US-IMPT) plan with that of conventional clinical plans without urethral dose reduction. Materials and Methods This study included 13 patients who had undergone proton beam therapy. The prescribed dose was 63 GyE in 21 fractions for 99% of the clinical target volume. To compare the clinical impact of the US-IMPT plan with that of the conventional clinical plan, tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated with a generalized equivalent uniform dose-based Lyman–Kutcher model using dose volume histograms. The endpoints of these model parameters for the rectum, bladder, and urethra were fistula, contraction, and urethral stricture, respectively. Results The mean NTCP value for the urethra in US-IMPT was significantly lower than that in the conventional clinical plan (0.6% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the conventional and US-IMPT plans regarding the mean minimum dose for the urethra with a 3-mm margin, TCP value, and NTCP value for the rectum and bladder. Additionally, the target dose coverage of all plans in the robustness analysis was within the clinically acceptable range. Conclusions Compared with the conventional clinically applied plans, US-IMPT plans have potential clinical advantages and may reduce the risk of genitourinary toxicities, while maintaining the same TCP and NTCP in the rectum and bladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Yoshimura
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Seki
- Division of Radiological Science and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shouki Kogame
- Division of Radiological Science and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Sodai Tanaka
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaya Tamura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keiji Kobashi
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Fumi Kato
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|