Prophylaxis of hepatitis B reactivation using lamivudine in a patient receiving rituximab

Hepatitis B Reactivation with Novel Agents in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Prevention Strategies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains an endemic disease in most parts of the world despite available prophylactic vaccines. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is the most common hematological malignancy, and certain patients undergoing therapy are at increased risk of HBV reactivation. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, is well studied in HBV reactivation, but newer agents have been implicated as well. Here, we review novel agents suspected in HBV reactivation and effective strategies to prevent HBV reactivation. Fifteen years of literature were reviewed in order to better understand the reactivation rates of hepatitis B in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Anti-CD20 antibodies continue to be the main medications that can lead to HBV reactivation, and HBV reactivation rates have decreased with increased awareness. HBV reactivation is uncommon when using other novel agents. Entecavir and lamivudine remain the agents of choice to prevent HBV reactivation in high risk patients. In conclusion, the immunosuppressive effect of NHL and its therapy provide a pathway for HBV reactivation, especially in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibody. Since many HBV positive patients are often excluded from clinical trials of novel agents in NHL, more aggressive post-market surveillance of new agents, well-designed best practice advisories, and timely case reports are needed to reduce the incidence of HBV reactivation. Lastly, large prospective investigations coupled with well-utilized best practice advisories need to be conducted to understand the impact of more potent novel NHL therapy on HBV reactivation.

Risk of Reverse Seroconversion of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen in Rituximab-Treated Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: A Large Cohort Retrospective Study

Rituximab causes hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-seronegative patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CD20 NHL), especially for those seropositive to the antibody of core antigen (anti-HBc). Clinical hepatitis usually develops after reverse seroconversion of HBsAg (HBV-RS), indicated by the reappearance of HBsAg in serum. Because of the relatively high prevalence of anti-HBc seropositivity in unvaccinated HBsAg-seronegative adults in an HBV hyperendemic area, we aimed to investigate additional factors influencing the development of rituximab-associated HBV-RS.Between January 2000 and December 2010, unvaccinated HBsAg-seronegative adults with CD20 NHL who had received rituximab-containing therapy but not anti-HBV agents were enrolled. Patients with and without HBV-RS were compared in terms of clinical factors and treatments including the number of cycles of rituximab therapy, and transplantation. Competing risk regression was used to identify the factors associated with HBV-RS.For the 482 patients enrolled, the serological status of anti-HBc was available in 75.9%, with a seropositivity rate of 86.6%. At the last follow-up, a total of 33 (6.85%) patients had HBV-RS, with 95.8% anti-HBc seropositive, 78.9% anti-HBs seropositive, and none anti-HCV seropositive. HBV-RS patients have received more cycles (≥6) and prolonged durations of rituximab therapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The overall survival was not different between patients with and those without HBV-RS. At the time of HBV-RS, a total of 25 (78.1%) patients had hepatitis flare, especially when HBV-RS appeared during/after induction therapy (100%, 10 of 10). Three (9.1%) patients had fulminant hepatitis, resulting in death in 1 (3%) patient. A higher rituximab cycle intensity was associated with a higher rate of hepatitis flare at the time of HBV-RS. When death in the absence of HBV-RS was considered as the competing risk, the univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that several factors were independently associated with the development of HBV-RS, including anti-HCV seronegativity, histological subtype of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, ≥6 cycles of rituximab therapy, and succeeding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.The findings of our study identify additional factors influencing the development of rituximab-associated HBV-RS in HBsAg-seronegative adults with CD20 NHL.

Preparative regimen dosing for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic hepatic impairment: analysis of the literature and recommendations

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially life-saving therapy for patients with malignant and nonmalignant disease states. Transplant has been associated with high treatment-related morbidity and mortality, therefore limiting its usefulness in patients with baseline liver dysfunction. In the event that a patient with hepatic insufficiency is selected for HSCT, dosage adjustments may be considered; however, no reliable endogenous biomarkers can serve as a guide for adjustments. There is no clear standard or guideline for how to approach these patients, and most adjustments are made empirically on the basis of expert opinion. This article offers practical advice and outlines our personal approaches to provide dosing recommendations for commonly-used preparative agents in the setting of hepatic impairment with the aim to optimize dosing for this patient population.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation with rituximab-containing regimen

Rituximab is recognized as a useful drug for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and its use has been extended to such diseases as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, chronic rheumatoid arthritis and ANCA-associated vasculitides. One serious complication associated with its use is the reactivation of hepatitis B virus and the search for methods to prevent this occurrence has resulted in the rapid accumulation of knowledge. In this review, we discuss case analyses from our department and other groups and outline the current knowledge on the topic and the remaining issues.

Rituximab biosimilars

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, used to treat B cell malignancies and B cell-mediated autoimmune diseases. Rituximab has the largest market of any monoclonal antibody therapeutic. Its patent will expire within the next few years and several manufacturers have already produced or are developing rituximab biosimilars that aim to match the innovator rituximab as closely as possible.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss key factors that determine the efficacy of rituximab therapy, potential technical challenges in the manufacture and evaluation of biosimilars, regulatory considerations regarding the review and approval of biosimilars, and the current status of biosimilar rituximab development by various manufacturers. Due to the nature of the topic, literature searches included conference abstracts, regulatory and industry websites as well as peer reviewed literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Cost is a key limitation of current biologics usage and there is a political impetus to the licensing of biosimilars. Concerns regarding potential dissimilarities of biosimilars are legitimate, but surmountable with techniques for in vitro, in vivo and clinical testing and more clearly defined regulatory requirements. These should provide reassurance to prescribers. However, the cost of manufacturing and licensing a biosimilar remains high and the reduction in cost may be more limited than for a non-biologic small molecule drug and its generic version. This cost reduction will be critical to the impact and use of rituximab biosimilars.

Consensus statement on blocking the effects of interleukin-6 and in particular by interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions

BACKGROUND

Since approval of tocilizumab (TCZ) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway inhibition was evaluated in trials of TCZ and other agents targeting the IL-6 receptor and ligand in various RA populations and other inflammatory diseases. This consensus document informs on interference with the IL-6 pathway based on evidence and expert opinion.

METHODS

Preparation of this document involved international experts in RA treatment and RA patients. A systematic literature search was performed that focused on TCZ and other IL6-pathway inhibitors in RA and other diseases. Subsequently, incorporating available published evidence and expert opinion, the steering committee and a broader expert committee (both including RA patients) formulated the current consensus statement.

RESULTS

The consensus statement covers use of TCZ as combination- or monotherapy in various RA populations and includes clinical, functional and structural aspects. The statement also addresses the second approved indication in Europe JIA and non-approved indications. Also early phase trials involving additional agents that target the IL-6 receptor or IL-6 were evaluated. Safety concerns, including haematological, hepatic and metabolic issues as well as infections, are addressed likewise.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus statement identifies points to consider when using TCZ, regarding indications, contraindications, screening, dose, comedication, response evaluation and safety. The document is aimed at supporting clinicians and informing patients, administrators and payers on opportunities and limitations of IL-6 pathway inhibition.

Efficacy of prophylactic lamivudine to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation in B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a common complication in patients with HBV infection who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. In rituximab-containing chemotherapy for B-cell lymphoma, severe hepatitis due to HBV reactivation occurred. The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of prophylactic lamivudine on the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with HBV infection who receive rituximab-containing chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this study, HBV markers and liver function tests were monitored in 268 consecutive patients with B-cell lymphoma, who received rituximab-containing chemotherapy between January 2008 and November 2011. Sixty-nine patients (25.7 %) with either chronic HBV infection or past HBV infection received prophylaxis with lamivudine 100 mg daily by oral intake.

RESULTS

In the HBsAg-positive group, six (6/38) patients developed hepatitis, only one of which was attributed to HBV reactivation. In the HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive group, two (2/31) patients developed hepatitis, none of which was attributed to HBV reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support that prophylactic lamivudine can prevent HBV reactivation for B-cell lymphoma with HBV infection who was receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy.

Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns that severe infections may arise. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether or not the addition of R to C may increase the risk of severe infections in adults undergoing induction therapy for CD20+ ML.

METHODS

Only randomised controlled trials comparing R-C to C standard alone in adult patients with CD20+ ML were included. Meta-analysis was performed on overall incidence of severe infection, risk of dying as the consequence of infection, risk of febrile neutropenia, risk of severe leucopenia, risk of severe granulocytopenia and overall response assuming a fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated, if present and I2 >20%, according to several predefined baseline characteristics of the study populations.

RESULTS

Several relevant results have emerged. First, the addition of R to standard C does not increase the overall risk of severe infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) nor does it increase the risk of dying as a consequence of infection (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.75). Second, we confirmed that the addition of R to standard C increases the proportion of overall response (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), but it also increases the risk of severe leucopenia (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.37) and granulocytopenia (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

R-C is superior to standard C in terms of overall response and it does not increase the overall incidence of severe infection. However, data on special groups of patients (for example, HIV positive subjects and HBV carriers) are lacking. In our opinion more studies are needed to explore the potential effect of R on silent and chronic viral infections.

The underlying mechanisms for the "simultaneous HBsAg and anti-HBs serological profile"

The course of HBV infection is determined by the interplay between viral replication via HBV protein production and the host's immune response. Therefore, the diagnosis of infection in clinical practice is established by the serological detection of HBV protein products as well as antibodies produced by the host. Although the serological findings for assessing the clinical course of infection are already well established, the expression of viral proteins and the dynamics of antibody production may vary during the natural course of infection. This causes the HBV infection to be occasionally associated with the presence of unusual serologic profiles, which can lead to doubts in the interpretation of results and mistaken serological diagnosis. The simultaneous detection of HBsAg and anti-HBs in the blood stream comprises an atypical serological profile, somewhat incoherent, whose significance can be complicated to establish. Outlined in this article are some immunological and molecular mechanisms which could justify the existence of this profile in which there is a great laboratorial and clinical interest.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation under rituximab therapy

Rituximab is a useful drug for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and its use has been extended to other diseases such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and chronic rheumatoid arthritis. One serious complication associated with rituximab use is reactivation of hepatitis B virus, and the search for methods to prevent this occurrence has resulted in a rapid accumulation of knowledge in recent years. In this review, we will discuss case studies from our group, as well as other groups, and outline current knowledge on the topic together with issues that remain to be resolved.

Hepatitis B Reactivation in a HBsAg-Negative, HBcAb-Positive Patient Receiving Fludarabine for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is an increasingly recognized cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing chemotherapy. In haematology, the risk of reactivation of B hepatitis among HBsAg-positive patients has been documented; therefore, use of lamivudine prophylaxis is recommended before starting chemotherapy. Differently, for HBsAg-negative patients with markers of previous HBV infection (i.e., presence of isolated anti-HBc positivity) (anticore patients) management strategies are not univocal. We describe a rare case of HBV reactivation in an anticore patient after fludarabine therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The patient fully recovered after a 6-month course of lamivudine with persistent HBV-DNA clearance and loss of HBsAg. The most important feature of this case is that fludarabine alone infrequently determines HBV reactivation, especially in anticore patients. Therefore, we suggest that patients candidates to receive fludarabine therapy should be considered for lamivudine prophylaxis, not only if HBsAg-positive, but even if anticore-positive only.

Rituximab administration and reactivation of HBV

Rituximab is a drug used for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and its range of use has expanded to the treatment of collagen diseases such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and rheumatoid arthritis. One serious complication of rituximab use is the reactivation of dormant hepatitis B virus, and prevention of this phenomenon has become an urgent issue. This paper provides a general outline of the problem through an analysis of patient cases that we and other groups have experienced to date.

Autoimmune hepatitis: new paradigms in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the three major autoimmune diseases affecting the liver, and of these three, AIH is the most typical autoimmune disease being characterized by a T-cell-rich infiltrate, raised circulating γ-globulins, autoantibodies, HLA associations, and links with other autoimmune diseases. It is the only one, of the three diseases, that responds well to immunosuppressive therapy. AIH is caused by dysregulation of immunoregulatory networks and the consequent emergence of autoreactive T cells that orchestrate a progressive destruction of hepatocytes leading untreated to liver failure. T cells play a major role in the immunopathogenesis, and both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are involved together with effector responses mediated by NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. A number of triggering factors have been proposed including viruses, xenobiotics, and drugs, but none have been conclusively shown to be involved in pathogenesis.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer Treatment: Role of Lamivudine Prophylaxis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a frequent complication in inactive HBV carriers at time of chemotherapy or following this chemotherapy. This complication appeared during or after chemotherapy and was not increased by the use of rituximab alone or combined with chemotherapy. This is a severe complication most frequently seen in lymphoma patients. Lamivudine have efficacy to treat the patients once the clinical disease is present. However, lamivudine prophylaxis beginning before chemotherapy and until at least 6 months after the end of chemotherapy is recommended for all HBV carriers. Hepatitis C virus is usually not associated with reactivation and prophylaxis should not be used.

Rituximab improves the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with autograft for high-risk follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei linfomi survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R-) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R- and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease.

RESULTS

A total of 355 R- (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R- and 2.8% for R+ (P = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R- groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R- were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse.

CONCLUSION

The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.

The effectiveness of lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B viral reactivation in rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma

In rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma, the role of lamivudine therapy has not been well established. Therefore, in this nonrandomized phase II clinical study, hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers with B-cell lymphoma who received rituximab-containing regimen were treated with oral administration of lamivudine. The incidence and severity of hepatitis along with other adverse clinical outcomes were analyzed. Between January 2003 and March 2006, 29 consecutive patients were enrolled. Four of the 29 patients (13.8%) developed hepatitis during chemotherapy, none of which was attributed to HBV reactivation. According to WHO acute toxicity assessment criteria, the severity of hepatitis was grade I in two patients (6.9%) and grade II in two patients (6.9%). In these four patients, only one (3.5%) had interval delay in chemotherapy. No patient had total abnormal bilirubin. No patient had died as the result of hepatitis during the treatment. Interestingly, one of the 29 patients developed HBV activation 5.1 months after the withdrawal of lamivudine. This patient recovered after reinstallation of lamivudine therapy and is still alive. Consequently, our study confirmed previous reports that prophylactic lamivudine therapy can prevent HBV reactivation in HBV carriers who were receiving rituximab-containing regimen for lymphoma.

Lamivudine prevents reactivation of hepatitis B and reduces mortality in immunosuppressed patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

To assess the effects of prophylactic lamivudine on reactivation and mortality following immunosuppressive therapy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients, we performed a meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized prospective controlled trials and retrospective comparative case series were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. The primary outcomes were virological reactivation, clinical reactivation and mortality. Secondary outcomes included hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related mortality, liver histology, discontinuation or disruption of immunosuppressive therapy, lamivudine-resistant HBV strains and adverse events. A total of 21 studies were included, two of which were randomized controlled trials. Clinical and virological reactivation were significantly reduced in the lamivudine group [odds ratio (OR) 0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.15 and OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01-0.14 respectively]. All-cause mortality was significantly reduced in the lamivudine group (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.56) which translates to only 11 patients who need to be treated to prevent one death. Lamivudine significantly reduced HBV-related mortality, and discontinuations or disruptions of the immunosuppressive treatment. No adverse effects of lamivudine were recorded, and resistance to lamivudine occurred in low rates. We demonstrated a clear benefit of lamivudine in terms of clinical and virological HBV reactivation, overall mortality, HBV-related mortality and interruptions or discontinuations in the immunosuppressive treatment. Lamivudine should be administered prophylactically to HBsAg-positive patients who are about to receive immunosuppressive therapy.

Monitoring serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in patients with HCV-infected CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma undergoing rituximab combination chemotherapy

Several studies have shown that the frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is high in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In these studies, liver dysfunction during chemotherapy has been demonstrated, but changes in HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels during chemotherapy have not been well documented. In this study, we monitored serum HCV RNA levels and liver function in five HCV-infected patients with B-cell NHL undergoing treatment with rituximab-combination chemotherapy. Increased HCV RNA levels during or after the chemotherapy were observed in all five patients, and a significant increase in transaminases was seen in one case. In this case, serum HCV RNA level dramatically decreased at the time of the increase of transaminases, and this suggested that the cause of liver damage was an immune reaction against hepatocytes with HCV and not any anticancer drug induced liver toxicity. Monitoring of serum HCV RNA levels and transaminases may be helpful to understand the cause of liver dysfunction in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, increases of HCV viral load were not associated with the occurrence of liver dysfunction in this study. Further studies will be necessary to investigate more fully the relationship between changes in HCV viral load and liver function during chemotherapy for HCV-infected patients.

Antiviral prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers are at considerable risk of reactivation of HBV infection when undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Complications of HBV reactivation, including asymptomatic elevation of HBV DNA levels, acute hepatitis, acute liver failure, and delays or dose reductions in chemotherapy, are avoidable with appropriate prophylactic oral antiviral therapy. This article reviews evidence for and presents a grade A recommendation supporting primary prophylaxis among HBV carriers with lamivudine. The dose and duration of prophylaxis, risk of lamivudine resistance, and future directions of prophylactic therapy for HBV reactivation during chemotherapy are discussed. Recommendations are suggested based on expert opinion for prophylaxis with the combination of lamivudine plus adefovir or with entecavir as alternative antiviral strategies that substantially reduce or avoid the risk of HBV antiviral drug resistance.

Rituximab-related viral infections in lymphoma patients

Recently, a human/mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody, rituximab, has been successfully used to treat cases of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and some autoimmune diseases. However, several viral infections related to rituximab have been reported in the literature, but were not well characterized. To further investigate this topic, relevant English language studies were identified through Medline. There were 64 previously reported cases of serious viral infection after rituximab treatment. The median age of the cases was 61 years (range: 21 - 79). The median time period from the start of rituximab treatment to viral infection diagnosis was 5.0 months (range: 1 - 20). The most frequently experienced viral infections were hepatitis B virus (HBV) (39.1%, n = 25), cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) (23.4%, n = 15), varicella-zoster virus (VZV) (9.4%, n = 6), and others (28.1%, n = 18). Of the patients with HBV infections, 13 (52.0%) died due to hepatic failure. Among the 39 cases that had viral infections other than HBV, 13 died due to these specific infections. In this study, about 50% of the rituximab-related HBV infections resulted in death, whereas this was the case in only 33% of the cases with other infections. Close monitoring for viral infection, particularly HBV and CMV, in patients treated with rituximab should be recommended.

Late lethal hepatitis B virus reactivation after rituximab treatment of low-grade cutaneous B-cell lymphoma

The chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, is a promising treatment for cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. Classically used in combination with a multiagent-chemotherapy regimen, it can sometimes give excellent results alone. Because of its selective action on B lymphocytes, it is considered a moderate immunosuppressant in terms of infection. We describe a woman with relapsed cutaneous follicular centre B-cell lymphoma and secondary lymph-node involvement treated with rituximab alone, which induced a complete remission. One year later, she experienced a fatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. Several such HBV reactivations were reported after combined rituximab and multiagent chemotherapy for B-cell lymphomas. This is the first case of HBV reactivation occurring during the year following rituximab monotherapy in the absence of any other immunosuppressive factor.

What is the role of rituximab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis?

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against CD20 that was developed for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Recent controlled trials have shown that B cell-targeted therapy with rituximab is effective in RA (which suggest that B lymphocytes may be critical in its pathogenesis of RA) and early exposure data suggest that the tolerability and safety profile of rituximab may be even better in RA than in NHL patients. Rituximab is generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of serious adverse events, including serious infections. Available evidence suggests that its clinical benefits depend on effective B cell depletion, and the fact that its novel mode of action leads to the depletion of B cells makes it distinct from other biological therapies for RA that target T cells and their related cytokines. Although complete peripheral B cell depletion is regularly seen in RA and other autoimmune diseases, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), incomplete depletion has been reported in a subset of patients, even after full dosing with rituximab.

Consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

A large number of experts experienced in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis were involved in formulating a consensus statement on the use of B cell-targeted treatment with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The statement was supported by data from randomised controlled clinical trials and the substantial literature on oncology. The statement underwent three rounds of discussions until its ultimate formulation. It should guide clinicians in the use of this newly approved biological agent in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Impact of Biologic Agents on Infectious Diseases

Until recently, inflammatory diseases, collagen vascular diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, and multiple sclerosis were met with a limited offering for treatment. The introduction of biologic agents has revolutionized the approach to these diseases, offering many patients freedom from disease activity staving off resultant destruction to organs and joints with marked improvement in quality of life and disability. This article focuses on the development of serious infections associated with the use of biologic agents. Presented is a synthesis of case series, reports, and systematic reviews to elucidate implicated pathogens and clinical presentations in patients being treated with biologic agents and to form a cursory backbone for prevention and treatment strategies to which clinicians prescribing these agents or encountering patients already on these agents can readily refer. Maintenance of a high index of suspicion is imperative for the prevention and appropriate treatment of serious life-threatening infections in these patients.

Systematic review: lamivudine prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection in asymptomatic hepatitis B surface antigen carriers undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy is a well-documented and potentially fatal complication. Data supporting the use of lamivudine for primary prophylaxis have emerged, but its use remains controversial and is not standardized.

AIM

To review current randomized-controlled trials, randomized trials and prospective case series to provide a clinically applicable, evidence-based recommendation.

METHODS

The published literature was identified using a MEDLINE/PubMed search with secondary review of cited publications, and inclusion of all prospective studies.

RESULTS

In nine prospective trials and one randomized-controlled trial, the rate of hepatitis among subjects receiving lamivudine prophylaxis ranged from 0% to 20% (16 of 173, 9.2%), compared with 33-67% among controls. Of patients receiving prophylaxis, 0-24% (15 of 173, 8.7%) developed hepatitis B virus reactivation, compared with 29-56% of controls. Three reactivation-related mortalities were reported (one receiving prophylaxis, two controls). No patients withdrew secondary to toxicity or development of lamivudine-resistant mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The available data show a four- to sevenfold decrease in the rate of hepatitis and hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients who receive lamivudine prophylaxis. It is thus recommended that all hepatitis B surface antigen carriers receive lamivudine, or a comparable anti-viral agent, as prophylaxis from the initiation of chemotherapy until at least 1 year following its completion.

Rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

For more than 25 years, the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) was considered the gold standard for the treatment of aggressive lymphomas, 90% of which are diffuse, large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). Attempts to improve results by more intensive chemotherapy regimens, including high-dose chemotherapy approaches necessitating stem-cell support, have not convincingly shown improved outcome of DLBCL. The chimeric monoclonal antibody rituximab, which binds to the CD20 antigen expressed on normal B cells and the malignant cells of more than 90% of DLBCLs, and mediates lysis of these cells by direct induction of apoptosis, activation of complement- and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro, is an attractive candidate for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Initial studies in follicular lymphoma demonstrated its efficacy as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy without adding relevant toxicity. After the demonstration of rituximab single-agent activity in DLBCL, a pivotal trial in elderly patients demonstrated that combining rituximab with eight applications of CHOP significantly improved complete remission, event-free and overall survival rates when compared with CHOP alone. These positive results have meanwhile been confirmed by two additional randomized trials in elderly patients and have been extended to young patients with good-prognosis DLBCL by a fourth trial. While not yet formally established in young, poor-prognosis patients, rituximab in combination with CHOP has become accepted worldwide as the new standard for the treatment of DLBCL. Questions remain concerning the optimal dosage and schedule of rituximab for DLBCL, as well as the optimal chemotherapy regimen partner for rituximab. Rituximab is the first monoclonal antibody to consistently improve survival rates of patients with a malignant disease. Its excellent efficacy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, together with its favorable toxicity profile, establishes rituximab as an indispensable component of modern standard immunochemotherapy of DLBCL.

Accelerated hepatitis C virus replication with rituximab treatment in a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patient

The treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) may be complicated by concomitant chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Recent data suggest that HCV may also be a contributing factor to the development of this disease. Although antiviral treatment has occasionally been reported to result in the regression of lymphoma in patients with HCV infection, the importance of the control of this infection on the prognosis of lymphoma needs to be defined. Here we report a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who presented with a mass in her left breast. She had had HCV-related liver cirrhosis for 6 years. She was given rituximab monotherapy for three consecutive weeks, but treatment had to be discontinued as a result of hematological toxicity. HCV viral load also increased, but then decreased gradually after rituximab was stopped. She could be given no further therapy. Six months later she presented with spinal involvement with infiltration of the cauda equina. Though cranial-spinal radiotherapy and steroids were started, she died shortly thereafter. Though rituximab is an invaluable drug in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, we believe that the use of such agents with potentially long-lasting effects on B lymphocytes requires extended vigilance for accelerated replication of hepatitis B and C viruses.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus with rituximab

Rituximab has become a useful drug for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and such autoimmune diseases as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and rheumatoid arthritis. When combined with cytotoxic agents, rituximab showed synergistic effects for the treatment of NHL. In such treatment, hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a crucial complication when patients are treated with immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents. Despite its treatment efficacy, several studies have pointed out unusual viral infections after its administration that resulted in fatal hepatitis due to HBV reactivation. In the cases at the authors' institute, the authors analysed the kinetics of HBV antibodies, HBV-reactivation timing, and the prophylactic efficacy of lamivudine. The authors reviewed their cases and the previous literature to clarify the characteristics of HBV-reactivated patients who were administered rituximab.

Anti-HBs-positive liver failure due to hepatitis B virus reactivation induced by rituximab

A 59-year-old man developed acute hepatitis with reactivated hepatitis B virus (HBV) following administration of rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody). The patient was diagnosed with malignant lymphoma in 1998, and virus marker testing indicated HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and anti-HBs antibody (anti-HBs)-positive results when chemotherapy including rituximab was started. Levels of aminotransferases were elevated, and HBsAg results turned positive. Despite therapy for late-onset hepatic failure, the patient died. Rituximab appears likely to have induced HBV reactivation in this case. Anti-viral agents should be administered for both HBsAg-positive and anti-HBs-positive patients who are scheduled to receive rituximab.

Prevention of hepatitis B reactivation with lamivudine in hepatitis B virus carriers with hematologic malignancies treated with chemotherapy--a prospective case series

Administration of immunosuppressive treatment in hepatitis B virus carriers with malignancies is associated with the risk of hepatitis B reactivation. This complication is more frequent in patients with hematologic malignancies because administration of corticosteroids, the mainstay of treatment of these patients, is an independent risk factor for hepatitis B reactivation. When lamivudine is given prior to chemotherapy, it prevents the viral replication during the immunosuppression period; therefore, it might reduce the risk of hepatitis B exacerbation. We performed a prospective study to assess the efficacy of prophylactic administration of lamivudine in this setting. Ten hepatitis B virus carriers with hematologic malignancies were included in this study; seven were HBsAg positive, and three had isolated antiHBc and detectable HBV-DNA levels. Nine patients were given corticosteroids after the administration of lamivudine. Lamivudine was given per os at a dose of 100 mg once daily. In four patients that had not been previously treated with chemotherapy, lamivudine was started 19 days (median) (range, 0-35 days) prior to the onset of chemotherapy. The administration of lamivudine has not stopped since in any of our patients. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 6-38 months), no hepatitis B reactivation was observed. HBV-DNA levels were decreased in all 6 patients who had detectable HBV-DNA at baseline. Lamivudine was well tolerated. Chemotherapy regimens were administered as planned, and their effectiveness was not compromised by lamivudine. In conclusion, prophylactic administration of lamivudine should be considered as a means of reducing the frequency of hepatitis B reactivation in hepatitis B virus carriers with hematologic malignancies who are being treated with chemotherapy.

Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera)

Rituximab, a human/mouse chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, has become part of standard therapy for patients with CD20-expressing B-cell lymphoma, and is currently under investigation for other indications including autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its characteristic tolerability profile was established soon after clinical testing began and compares favourably with chemotherapy. The majority of patients experience mild to moderate infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first administration of rituximab, but the incidence decreases markedly with subsequent infusions. Current data suggest that the type of adverse events in patients with RA are similar to those in lymphoma, but that adverse events related to the rituximab infusions are less severe and less frequent. Rituximab induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20-expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and levels remain low or undetectable for 2-6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Serum immunoglobulin levels remain largely stable, although a reduction in IgM has been described. T-cells are unaffected by rituximab and consequently opportunistic infections rarely occur in association with rituximab therapy. When used in combination with a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, rituximab does not add to the toxicity of chemotherapy, with the exception of a higher rate of neutropenia. However, this does not translate into a higher infection rate. Over 540,000 patients worldwide have now received rituximab and serious adverse reactions have occurred in a small minority of patients, but for the great majority of patients, rituximab is safe and well tolerated.

Treatment of refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with Campath-1H in combination with lamivudine in chronic hepatitis B infection

Campath-1H, a monoclonal antibody against human CD52, is used for the therapy of refractory or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Treatment with campath is associated with an increased incidence of infections and also fatal reactivation of viral infections. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in HBsAg-positive patients is a well-documented complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy and has also been observed after treatment with rituximab. To date, there are no reports on campath treatment in HBsAg carriers. Here, we present the case of a patient with heavily pretreated CLL who was HBsAg-positive with a high virus load (>2 billion copies/mL). He required treatment because of progressive CLL with massive bone marrow infiltration, severe anemia and thrombocytopenia. Campath was initiated and lamivudine, an inhibitor of reverse transcriptase, was simultaneously given to prevent HBV proliferation. During the treatment, no deterioration of liver parameters was observed, and the virus load decreased. After therapy with campath, hemoglobin and platelet counts increased markedly. This report shows that lamivudine is highly effective in inhibiting HBV proliferation and can be used to prevent HBV flare-up during campath treatment in patients tested positive for HBs antigen.

Prophylaxis with lamivudine of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic HbsAg carriers with hemato-oncological neoplasias treated with chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is well documented complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy in asymptomatic HBV carriers. Its clinical manifestation include fulminant hepatitis which may result in fatal liver failure. With the more widespread use of chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the problem of delivering potentially harmful treatment to HBV carriers is becoming increasingly frequent. Until recently the management of HBV reactivation has been mainly supportive. With the introduction of lamivudine, a highly effective nucleoside analogue against HBV with an excellent toxicity profile has become available. However, in light of the possibility that its prolonged use may foster the emergence of mutant lamivudine-resistant HBV strain, caution is required before recommending its widespread use. The present review briefly addresses the epidemiological, pathogenetic and clinical aspects of HBV reactivation as well the predisposing factors to its development. The results obtained with lamivudine both as treatment and as prophylaxis of hepatic flares are analysed in detail in order to provide a rational basis for clinical decisions before treating HBV carriers with chemotherapy.