Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with frequent and rare patient-specific NPM1 mutations

Challenges facing minimal residual disease testing for acute myeloid leukemia and promising strategies to overcome them

INTRODUCTION

Minimal residual disease (MRD) has been an important biomarker for relapse prediction and treatment choice in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). False-positive or false-negative MRD results due to the low specificity and sensitivity of techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, as well as the biological characteristics of residual leukemia cells, including antigen shift, clone involution, heterogeneous genome of the blast cells, and lack of specific targets, all restrict the clinical use of MRD.

AREAS COVERED

We summarized the challenges of the techniques for MRD detection, and their application in the clinical setting. We also discussed strategies to overcome these challenges, such as the MFC MRD method based on leukemia stem cells, single-cell DNA sequencing or single-cell RNA sequencing for the investigation of biological characteristics of residual leukemia cells, and the potential of omics techniques for MRD detection. We further noted out that prospective clinical trials are needed to answer clinical questions related to MRD in patients with AML.

EXPERT OPINION

MRD is an important biomarker for individual therapy of patients with AML. In the future, it is important to increase the specificity and sensitivity of the detection techniques.

The Role of Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation in the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloid Neoplasms

Nucleophosmin (NPM1) is a multifunctional protein with both proliferative and growth-suppressive roles in the cell. In humans, NPM1 is involved in tumorigenesis via chromosomal translocations, deletions, or mutation. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated NPM1, a distinct diagnostic entity by the current WHO Classification of myeloid neoplasm, represents the most common diagnostic subtype in AML and is associated with a favorable prognosis. The persistence of NPM1 mutation in AML at relapse makes this mutation an ideal target for minimal measurable disease (MRD) detection. The clinical implication of this is far-reaching because NPM1-mutated AML is currently classified as being of standard risk, with the best treatment strategy (transplantation versus chemotherapy) yet undefined. Myeloid neoplasms with NPM1 mutations and <20% blasts are characterized by an aggressive clinical course and a rapid progression to AML. The pathological classification of these cases remains controversial. Future studies will determine whether NPM1 gene mutation may be sufficient for diagnosing NPM1-mutated AML independent of the blast count. This review aims to summarize the role of NPM1 in normal cells and in human cancer and discusses its current role in clinical management of AML and related myeloid neoplasms.

Comparison of RNA- and DNA-based methods for measurable residual disease analysis in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is considered the method of choice for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD can also be determined with DNA-based methods offering certain advantages. We here compared the DNA-based methods quantitative PCR (qPCR), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and targeted deep sequencing (deep seq) with RT-qPCR.

METHODS

Of 110 follow-up samples from 30 patients with NPM1-mutated AML were analyzed by qPCR, ddPCR, deep seq, and RT-qPCR. To select DNA MRD cutoffs for bone marrow, we performed receiver operating characteristic analyses for each DNA method using prognostically relevant RT-qPCR cutoffs.

RESULTS

The DNA-based methods showed strong intermethod correlation, but were less sensitive than RT-qPCR. A bone marrow cutoff at 0.1% leukemic DNA for qPCR or 0.05% variant allele frequency for ddPCR and deep seq offered optimal sensitivity and specificity with respect to 3 log₁₀ reduction of NPM1 transcripts and/or 2% mutant NPM1/ABL. With these cutoffs, MRD results agreed in 95% (191/201) of the analyses. Although more sensitive, RT-qPCR failed to detect leukemic signals in 10% of samples with detectable leukemic DNA.

CONCLUSION

DNA-based MRD techniques may complement RT-qPCR for assessment of residual leukemia. DNA-based methods offer high positive and negative predictive values with respect to residual leukemic NPM1 transcripts at levels of importance for response to treatment. However, moving to DNA-based MRD methods will miss a proportion of patients with residual leukemic RNA, but on the other hand some MRD samples with detectable leukemic DNA can be devoid of measurable leukemic RNA.

Peripheral blood molecular measurable residual disease is sufficient to identify patients with acute myeloid leukaemia with imminent clinical relapse

Longitudinal molecular measurable residual disease (MRD) sampling after completion of therapy serves as a refined tool for identification of imminent relapse of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) among patients in long-term haematological complete remission. Tracking of increasing quantitative polymerase chain reaction MRD before cytomorphological reappearance of blasts may instigate individual management decisions and has paved the way for development of pre-emptive treatment strategies to substantially delay or perhaps even revert leukaemic regrowth. Traditionally, MRD monitoring is performed using repeated bone marrow aspirations, albeit the current European LeukemiaNet MRD recommendations acknowledge the use of peripheral blood as an alternative source for MRD assessment. Persistent MRD positivity in the bone marrow despite continuous morphological remission is frequent in both core binding factor leukaemias and nucleophosmin 1-mutated AML. In contrast, monthly assessment of MRD in peripheral blood superiorly separates patients with imminent haematological relapse from long-term remitters and may allow pre-emptive therapy of AML relapse.

Measurable residual disease testing for personalized treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

This review summarizes - with the practicing hematologist in mind - the methods used to determine measurable residual disease (MRD) in everyday practice with some future perspectives, and the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of MRD on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia. Possible implications for choice of MRD method, timing of MRD monitoring, and guidance of therapy are discussed in general and in some detail for certain types of leukemia with specific molecular markers to monitor, including core binding factor (CBF)-leukemias and NPM1-mutated leukemias.

Antigen Targets for the Development of Immunotherapies in Leukemia

Immunotherapeutic approaches, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion, have significantly improved the prognosis of leukemia patients. Further efforts are now focusing on the development of immunotherapies that are able to target leukemic cells more specifically, comprising monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and dendritic cell- or peptide-based vaccination strategies. One main prerequisite for such antigen-specific approaches is the selection of suitable target structures on leukemic cells. In general, the targets for anti-cancer immunotherapies can be divided into two groups: (1) T-cell epitopes relying on the presentation of peptides via human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules and (2) surface structures, which are HLA-independently expressed on cancer cells. This review discusses the most promising tumor antigens as well as the underlying discovery and selection strategies for the development of anti-leukemia immunotherapies.

Association of HLA class I type with prevalence and outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and mutated nucleophosmin

Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated nucleophosmin (NPMc+ AML) forms a distinct AML subgroup with better prognosis which can potentially be associated with immune response against the mutated nucleophosmin (NPM). As the T-cell-mediated immunity involves antigen presentation on HLA class I molecules, we hypothesized that individuals with suitable HLA type could be less prone to develop NPMc+ AML. We compared HLA class I distribution in NPMc+ AML patient cohort (398 patients from 5 centers) with the HLA allele frequencies of the healthy population and found HLA-A*02, B*07, B*40 and C*07 underrepresented in the NPMc+ AML group. Presence of B*07 or C*07:01 antigen was associated with better survival in patients without concomitant FLT3 internal tandem duplication. Candidate NPM-derived immunopeptides were found for B*40 and B*07 using prediction software tools. Our findings suggest that a T-cell-mediated immune response could actually explain better prognosis of NPMc+ patients and provide a rationale for attempts to explore the importance of immunosuppressive mechanisms in this AML subgroup.

Clinical impact of measurable residual disease monitoring by ultradeep next generation sequencing in NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia

Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by mutation specific techniques has prognostic relevance in NPM1 mutated AML (NPM1^mut AML). However, the clinical utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect MRD in AML remains unproven. We analysed the clinical significance of monitoring MRD using ultradeep NGS (NGS-MRD) and flow cytometry (FCM-MRD) in 137 samples obtained from 83 patients of NPM1^mut AML at the end of induction (PI) and consolidation (PC). We could monitor 12 different types of NPM1 mutations at a sensitivity of 0.001% using NGS-MRD. We demonstrated a significant correlation between NGS-MRD and real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). Based upon a one log reduction between PI and PC time points we could classify patients as NGS-MRD positive (<1log reduction) or negative (>1log reduction). NGS-MRD, FCM-MRD as well as DNMT3A mutations were predictive of inferior overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS). On a multivariate analysis NGS-MRD emerged as an independent, most important prognostic factor predictive of inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 8.37) and RFS (hazard ratio, 4.8; 95% CI:2.24 to 10.28). We establish that DNA based NPM1 NGS MRD is a highly useful test for prediction of relapse and survival in NPM1^mut AML.

Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring in NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinical Viewpoint and Perspectives

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1 gene mutations is currently recognized as a distinct entity, due to its unique biological and clinical features. We summarize here the results of published studies investigating the clinical application of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with NPM1-mutated AML, receiving either intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Several clinical trials have so far demonstrated a significant independent prognostic impact of molecular MRD monitoring in NPM1-mutated AML and, accordingly, the Consensus Document from the European Leukemia Net MRD Working Party has recently recommended that NPM1-mutated AML patients have MRD assessment at informative clinical timepoints during treatment and follow-up. However, several controversies remain, mainly with regard to the most clinically significant timepoints and the MRD thresholds to be considered, but also with respect to the optimal source to be analyzed, namely bone marrow or peripheral blood samples, and the correlation of MRD with other known prognostic indicators. Moreover, we discuss potential advantages, as well as drawbacks, of newer molecular technologies such as digital droplet PCR and next-generation sequencing in comparison to conventional RQ-PCR to quantify NPM1-mutated MRD. In conclusion, further prospective clinical trials are warranted to standardize MRD monitoring strategies and to optimize MRD-guided therapeutic interventions in NPM1-mutated AML patients.

Role of minimal residual disease in the management of acute myeloid leukemia-a case-based discussion

AML is stratified into risk-categories based on cytogenetic and molecular features that prognosticate survival and facilitate treatment algorithms, though there is still significant heterogeneity within risk groupings with regard to risk of relapse and prognosis. The ambiguity regarding prognosis is due in large part to the relatively outdated criteria used to determine response to therapy. Whereas risk assessment has evolved to adopt cytogenetic and molecular profiling, response criteria are still largely determined by bone marrow morphologic assessment and peripheral cell count recovery. Minimal residual disease refers to the detection of a persistent population of leukemic cells below the threshold for morphologic CR determination. MRD assessment represents standard of care for ALL and PML, but concerns over prognostic capability and standardization have limited its use in AML. However, recent advancements in MRD assessment and research supporting the use of MRD assessment in AML require the reconsideration and review of this clinical tool in this disease entity. This review article will first compare and contrast the major modalities used to assess MRD in AML, such as RQ-PCR and flow cytometry, as well as touching upon newer technologies such as next-generation sequencing and digital droplet PCR. The majority of the article will discuss the evidence supporting the use of MRD assessment to prognosticate disease at various time points during treatment, and review the limited number of studies that have incorporated MRD assessment into novel treatment algorithms for AML. The article concludes by discussing the current major limitations to the implementation of MRD assessment in this disease. The manuscript is bookended by a clinical vignette that highlights the need for further research and refinement of this clinical tool.

Enhancing acute myeloid leukemia therapy - monitoring response using residual disease testing as a guide to therapeutic decision-making

INTRODUCTION

Current standards for monitoring the response of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are based on morphologic assessments of the bone marrow and recovery of peripheral blood counts. A growing experience is being developed to enhance the detection of small amounts of AML, or minimal residual disease (MRD). Areas covered: Available techniques include multi-color flow cytometry (MFC) of leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIP), quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for detecting fusion and mutated genes (RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, and NPM1), overexpression of genes such as WT1, and next generation sequencing (NGS) for MRD. Expert commentary: While MRD monitoring is standard of care in some leukemia subsets such as acute promyelocytic leukemia, this approach for the broader AML population does not universally predict outcomes as some patients may experience relapse in the setting of undetectable leukemia while others show no obvious disease progression despite MRD positivity. However, there are instances where MRD can identify patients at increased risk for relapse that may change recommended therapy. Currently, prospective investigations to define clinically relevant MRD thresholds are ongoing. Risk-adapted trials are needed to best define the use of MRD in the follow up of AML patients after initial induction therapy.

Correlation of NPM1 Type A Mutation Burden With Clinical Status and Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Mutated NPM1 Type A

Background

Nucleophosmin gene (NPM1) mutation may be a good molecular marker for assessing the clinical status and predicting the outcomes in AML patients. We evaluated the applicability of NPM1 type A mutation (NPM1-mutA) quantitation for this purpose.

Methods

Twenty-seven AML patients with normal karyotype but bearing the mutated NPM1 were enrolled in the study, and real-time quantitative PCR of NPM1-mutA was performed on 93 bone marrow (BM) samples (27 samples at diagnosis and 56 at follow-up). The NPM1-mutA allele burdens (represented as the NPM1-mutA/Abelson gene (ABL) ratio) at diagnosis and at follow-up were compared.

Results

The median NPM1-mutA/ABL ratio was 1.3287 at diagnosis and 0.092 at 28 days after chemotherapy, corresponding to a median log₁₀ reduction of 1.7061. Significant correlations were observed between BM blast counts and NPM1-mutA quantitation results measured at diagnosis (γ=0.5885, P=0.0012) and after chemotherapy (γ=0.5106, P=0.0065). Total 16 patients achieved morphologic complete remission at 28 days after chemotherapy, and 14 (87.5%) patients showed a >3 log₁₀ reduction of the NPM1-mutA/ABL ratio. The NPM1-mutA allele was detected in each of five patients who had relapsed, giving a median increase of 0.91-fold of the NPM1-mutA/ABL ratio at relapse over that at diagnosis.

Conclusions

The NPM1-mutA quantitation results corresponded to BM assessment results with high stability at relapse, and could predict patient outcomes. Quantitation of the NPM1-mutA burden at follow-up would be useful in the management of AML patients harboring this gene mutation.

Introducing minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has the potential to improve risk stratification, and its routine monitoring may allow timely therapeutic actions such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The current review will discuss challenges and available evidence for clinical application of MRD detection in AML management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The heterogeneous nature of AML, variations in genetic aberrations and immunophenotypes among patients and between malignant subclones coexisting within a single patient, is a challenge for the development of a reliable MRD test in AML. MRD value was demonstrated in subtypes of AML in which reliable leukemia-specific genetic marker is present (e.g., core-binding leukemia, AML positive for NPM1 mutation). Multicolor flow cytometry and quantitative PCR monitoring for Wilms tumor 1 gene transcript have also been shown to correlate with disease progression. MRD results should always be interpreted within patient-specific clinical context considering other risk factors and timing of MRD eradication.

SUMMARY

Introduction of MRD testing into routine clinical practice is a challenge in AML. An improvement in laboratory techniques along with identification of additional leukemia-specific markers is required.

Quantitative detection of circulating nucleophosmin mutations DNA in the plasma of patients with acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the copies of circulating nucleophosmin (NPM) mutations DNA in the plasma of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and to explore the association of circulating NPM mutation levels with clinical characteristics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The presence of NPM mutations in 100 Chinese patients newly diagnosed with AML were identified by RT-PCR and sequencing analysis. Copies of circulating NPM mutation A (NPM mut.A) DNA in the plasma of mutation-positive cases were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, the association of circulating NPM mutation levels and clinical characteristics was analyzed.

RESULTS

NPM mutations were identified in 37 of the 100 patients and all cases were NPM mut.A. The circulating NPM mut.A levels ranged from 0.35×10(8) copies/ml to 6.0×10(8) copies/ml in the 37 mutation-positive cases. The medium and quartile M (P25, P75) of the circulating NPM mut.A levels in patients classified as M2, M4 and M5 morphological subtypes were 1.35×10(8) (0.76×10(8), 1.91×10(8)) copies/ml, 1.81×10(8) (1.47×10(8), 2.2×10(8)) copies/ml and 2.50×10(8) (2.42×10(8), 3.05×10(8)) copies/ml, respectively. Circulating NPM mut.A levels were significantly higher in patients with the M5 subtype of AML compared to patients with the M2 and M4 subtypes (p=0.000, p=0.046). In addition, circulating NPM mut.A copies were significantly associated with a higher white blood cell count, platelet count and bone marrow blast percentage (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that circulating NPM mutations DNA assay serves as a complementary to the routine investigative protocol of NPM-mutated leukemia.

Mutant Enrichment with 3'-Modified Oligonucleotides (MEMO)-Quantitative PCR for Detection of NPM1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Detection of NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is important for risk stratification, treatment decision, and therapeutic monitoring. We have designed a real-time PCR method implementing the Mutant enrichment with 3'-modified oligonucleotides (MEMO) technique to detect NPM1 mutations and validated its utility in clinical samples.

METHODS

Sensitivity and linearity were evaluated using serially diluted NPM1-positive samples. Clinical usefulness was assessed by measuring the levels of mutant alleles in 29 patients at diagnosis and in ten patients after induction chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Excellent linear relationships between the mutant allele proportion and the threshold cycle (Ct) values (r = 0.999) were observed in a range of 1:1-1:10(3) . MEMO-PCR was able to detect NPM1 mutations regardless of mutant type and also detected novel mutants (964_967delTGGAinsATGATGTC, 957_959delCTGinsATGCATG, 960insTAAG, and 960insTCAG). The concentrations of NPM1 mutant alleles decreased after induction chemotherapy in accordance with the reduction of tumor cells, and in one case, NPM1 mutant alleles were detectable about 7 months before morphological relapse.

CONCLUSION

MEMO-quantitative PCR was shown to detect virtually all types of NPM1 mutants with high sensitivity and specificity. This novel method may be useful in the diagnosis of AML with an NPM1 mutation, the detection of minimal residual disease, and the monitoring of treatment response.

Mutation position within evolutionary subclonal architecture in AML

Cytogenetic data suggest that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develops through a process of branching evolution, especially during relapse and progression. Recent genomic data from AML cases using digital sequencing, temporal comparisons, xenograft cloning, and single-cell analysis indicate that most, if not all, AML cases emerge through branching evolution. According to a review of the current literature, the balanced translocations (t[15;17], t[8;21], and inv[16]) and nucleotide variants in DNMT3A and TET2 most commonly occur in the founding clone at diagnosis. These mutations are rarely gained or lost at relapse, and the latter 2 mutations are observed in elderly subjects with mosaic hematopoiesis antedating overt leukemia. In contrast, +8, +13, +22, -X, -Y, and nucleotide variants in FLT3, NRAS/KRAS, WT1, and KIT frequently occur in subclones and are observed either to emerge or to be lost at relapse. Because drugs that target mutations within a subclone are unlikely to eliminate all leukemic cells, it will be essential to understand not only which mutations a patient has but also how they organize within the leukemic subclonal architecture.

Tumor heterogeneity makes AML a "moving target" for detection of residual disease

Detection of minimal residual disease is recognized as an important post-therapy risk factor in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Two most commonly used methods for residual disease monitoring are real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and multiparameter flow cytometry. The results so far are very promising, whereby it is likely that minimal residual disease results will enable to guide future post-remission treatment strategies. However, the leukemic clone may change between diagnosis and relapse due to the instability of the tumor cells. This instability may already be evident at diagnosis if different subpopulations of tumor cells coexist. Such tumor heterogeneity, which may be reflected by immunophenotypic, molecular, and/or cytogenetic changes, can have important consequences for minimal residual disease detection, since false-negative results can be expected to be the result of losses of aberrancies used as minimal residual disease markers. In this review the role of such changes in minimal residual disease monitoring is explored. Furthermore, possible causes of tumor instability are discussed, whereby the concept of clonal selection and expansion of a chemotherapy-resistant subpopulation is highlighted. Accordingly, detailed knowledge of the process of clonal evolution is required to improve both minimal residual disease risk stratification and patient outcome.

New Quantitative Method to Identify NPM1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Somatic mutations in the NPM1 gene, which encodes for nucleophosmin, have been reported to be the most frequent genetic abnormalities found in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Their identification and quantification remain crucial for the patients' residual disease monitoring. We investigated a new method that could represent a novel reliable alternative to sequencing for its identification. This method was based on high-resolution melting analysis in order to detect mutated patients and on an allele-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ASO-RQ-PCR) for the identification and quantification of the transcripts carrying NPM1 mutations (NPM1m). Few patients carrying known NPM1m enabled us to set up a table with the different primers' ΔCT values, identifying a profile for each mutation type. We then analysed a series of 337 AML patients' samples for NPM1 mutational status characterization and confirmed the ASO-RQ-PCR results by direct sequencing. We identified some mutations in 86 samples, and the results were fully correlated in 100% of the 36 sequenced samples. We also detected other rare NPM1m in two samples, that we confirmed by direct sequencing. This highly specific method provides a novel quick, useful, and costless tool, easy to use in routine practice.

Application of allele-specific quantitative PCR using genomic DNA to monitor minimal residual disease based on mutant gene levels following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies: comparison of mutant levels with autologous DNA percentage by short tandem repeat-PCR

BACKGROUND

Quantitative evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is indispensable for patients with hematological malignancies. In addition to established MRD markers such as immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, fusion genes, or aberrantly expressed genes, single nucleotide mutations are considered one of the MRD markers that reflect the malignant cell clone.

METHODS

We compared the quantity of mutant genes by allele-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (AS-qPCR) for single nucleotide mutations (TP53 410T>A and PTPN11 1508G>A) with the percentage of autologous DNA by short tandem repeat (STR)-PCR.

RESULTS

Following HSCT, the quantity of mutant genes detected by AS-qPCR correlated with the percentage of autologous DNA assessed by the STR-PCR. Moreover, mutant DNAs were detected at a quantifiable level before relapse, whereas the percentage of autologous DNA was less than 5%, that is, complete chimerism.

CONCLUSIONS

The AS-qPCR approach for single nucleotide mutations was accurate and highly sensitive for monitoring pre-transplantation as well as post-transplantation MRD. AS-qPCR for single nucleotide mutation is suitable for monitoring MRD in patients who lack previously established MRD markers.

NPM1 mutation is a stable marker for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukaemia patients with increased sensitivity compared to WT1 expression

Mutation in the NPM1 gene occurs in 60% of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients with normal karyotype. NPM1 mutation is potentially a superior minimal residual disease (MRD) marker compared to WT1 gene overexpression by being specific to the malignant clone, although experimental evidence published so far includes very limited numbers of relapsed cases. Also, the stability of the NPM1 mutation has been questioned by reports of the mutation being lost at relapse. In the present study we compared NPM1 mutation and WT1 overexpression as MRD markers in 20 cases of relapsed AML. The 20 patients experienced a total of 28 morphological relapses. Karyotypic evolution was detected in 56% of relapses. All relapses were accompanied by high levels of NPM1 mutation, along with high WT1 mRNA levels, thus demonstrating complete stability of both markers during relapse. Detectable NPM1 mutation following a period of morphological remission was accompanied by a morphological relapse in all cases. In contrast, WT1 expression was detected in 33% of the NPM1 mutation negative samples. This background WT1 expression produced by non-leukaemia cells was highly variable, both between and within patients, and limited the de facto sensitivity of the WT1 expression analysis. The present study therefore provides important experimental evidence demonstrating that NPM1 mutation is superior to WT1 overexpression as marker of MRD in NPM1-mutated AML, even in the presence of extensive karyotypic evolution.

Monitoring of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the German-Austrian acute myeloid leukemia study group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with NPM1 mutation (NPM1(mut)).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

RNA-based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) specific for the detection of six different NPM1(mut) types was applied to 1,682 samples (bone marrow, n = 1,272; blood, n = 410) serially obtained from 245 intensively treated younger adult patients who were 16 to 60 years old.

RESULTS

NPM1(mut) transcript levels as a continuous variable were significantly associated with prognosis after each treatment cycle. Achievement of RQ-PCR negativity after double induction therapy identified patients with a low cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 6.5% after 4 years) compared with RQ-PCR-positive patients (53.0%; P < .001); this translated into significant differences in overall survival (90% v 51%, respectively; P = .001). After completion of therapy, CIR was 15.7% in RQ-PCR-negative patients compared with 66.5% in RQ-PCR-positive patients (P < .001). Multivariable analyses after double induction and after completion of consolidation therapy revealed higher NPM1(mut) transcript levels as a significant factor for a higher risk of relapse and death. Serial post-treatment assessment of MRD allowed early detection of relapse in patients exceeding more than 200 NPM1(mut)/10(4) ABL copies.

CONCLUSION

We defined clinically relevant time points for NPM1(mut) MRD assessment that allow for the identification of patients with AML who are at high risk of relapse. Monitoring of NPM1(mut) transcript levels should be incorporated in future clinical trials to guide therapeutic decisions.