Predicting pain among children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Assessing pain in persons with opioid use disorder: Approaches, techniques and special considerations

Pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) are inextricably linked, as the former can be a risk factor for the development of the latter, and over a third of persons with OUD suffer concomitant chronic pain. Assessing pain among people with OUD is challenging, because ongoing opioid use brings changes in pain responses and most pain assessment tools have not been validated for this population. In this narrative review, we discuss the fundamentals of pain assessment for populations with OUD. First, we describe the biological, psychological and social aspects of the pain experience among people with OUD, as well as how opioid-related phenomena may contribute to the pain experience in this population. We then review methods to assess pain, including (1) traditional self-reported methods, such visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires; (2) behavioural observations and physiological indicators; (3) and laboratory-based approaches, such as quantitative sensory testing. These methods are considered from a perspective that encompasses both pain and OUD. Finally, we discuss strategies for improving pain assessment in persons with OUD and implications for future research, including educational strategies for multidisciplinary teams. We highlight the substantial gaps that persist in this literature, particularly regarding the applicability of current pain assessment methods to persons with OUD, as well as the generalizability of the existing results from adjacent populations on chronic opioid therapy but without OUD. As research linking pain and OUD evolves, considering the needs of diverse populations with complex psychosocial backgrounds, clinicians will be better equipped to reduce these gaps.

A systematic review of the psychosocial factors associated with pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Pain is one of the most frequently reported experiences amongst children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA); however, the management of JIA pain remains challenging. As pain is a multidimensional experience that is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, the key to effective pain management lies in understanding these complex relationships. The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on psychosocial factors of children with JIA and their caregivers 1) associated with and 2) predictive of later JIA pain intensity, frequency, and sensitivity in children 0-17 years of age.

METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for etiology and risk and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement guided the conduct and reporting of this review. Terms related to pain and JIA were searched in English without date restrictions across various databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) in September 2021. Two independent reviewers identified, extracted data from, and critically appraised the included studies. Conflicts were resolved via consensus.

RESULTS

Of the 9,929 unique studies identified, 61 were included in this review and reported on 516 associations. Results were heterogeneous, likely due to methodological differences and moderate study quality. Results identified predominantly significant associations between pain and primary and secondary appraisals (e.g., more child pain beliefs, lower parent/child self-efficacy, lower child social functioning), parent/child internalizing symptoms, and lower child well-being and health-related quality of life. Prognostically, studies had 1-to-60-month follow-up periods. Fewer beliefs of harm, disability, and no control were associated with lower pain at follow-up, whereas internalizing symptoms and lower well-being were predictive of higher pain at follow-up (bidirectional relationships were also identified).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the heterogeneous results, this review highlights important associations between psychosocial factors and JIA pain. Clinically, this information supports an interdisciplinary approach to pain management, informs the role of psychosocial supports, and provides information to better optimize JIA pain assessments and interventions. It also identifies a need for high quality studies with larger samples and more complex and longitudinal analyses to understand factors that impact the pain experience in children with JIA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021266716.

Depression And Anxiety In Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Current Insights And Impact On Quality Of Life, A Systematic Review

Depression and anxiety are prevalent in children with rheumatologic diseases, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, prevalence rates and the relationship with disease outcomes, including quality of life are conflicting in the early literature. To review the current literature, determine gaps in our knowledge, and identify areas in need of further investigation, we conducted a systematic review of studies examining depression and anxiety symptoms among children with JIA and the impact these symptoms may have on disease outcomes and quality of life. Six electronic databases were searched up until January 2019. Of 799 potential articles, 60 articles were included with the main focus on 28 articles from 2009 to 2019, to concentrate on the most current evidence. We found that JIA patients experience symptoms of depression and anxiety similar to other childhood chronic diseases and at higher rates than in healthy children. Patients who experience these symptoms have worse quality of life, with some evidence pointing to depression and anxiety symptoms having a greater impact on quality of life than other disease features, such as active joint count. Family members of JIA patients experience high rates of anxiety and depression symptoms which may impact their child's mental health and pain symptoms related to JIA. Conflicting reports of associations between depression/anxiety symptoms and disease features/disease outcomes and a paucity of longitudinal studies investigating the impact of treatment on mental health symptoms indicate areas in need of further research to effectively identify patients at greatest risk of depression and anxiety and to better understand how to treat and prevent these symptoms in youth with JIA. Family mental health should also be considered in investigations concerning mental health and disease outcomes of children with JIA.

A qualitative study examining the validity and comprehensibility of physical activity items: developed and tested in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Not all physical activity (PA) questionnaires (PAQ) gather information regarding PA intensity, duration, and modes and only a few were developed specifically for children. We assessed children's comprehensibility of items derived from two published PAQs used in children along with three items designed to ascertain PA intensity in order to assess comprehensibility of items and identify response errors. We modified items to create a new PAQ for children (ASCeND). We hypothesized that children would have comprehension difficulties with some original PAQ items and that ASCeND would be easier to comprehend, and would improve recall and reporting of PA.

METHODS

For this qualitative study, we recruited 30 Swedish children [ages 10-16 years; mean age = 13.0 (SD = 1.8)]; median disease activity score = 4.5 (IQR 2.2-9.0); median disease duration = 5.0 (IQR 2.6-10.8) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) from a children's hospital-based rheumatology clinic. We conducted cognitive interviews to identify children's comprehension of PAQ items. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and independently analyzed. In phase one, 10 children were interviewed and items modified based on feedback. In phase two, an additional 20 children were interviewed to gather more feedback and further refine the modified items, to create the ASCeND.

RESULTS

The median interview time was 41 min (IQR 36-56). In phase one, 219 comments were generated regarding directions for recording PA duration, and transportation use, walking, dancing, weight-bearing exercise and cardio fitness. Based on feedback we modified the survey layout, clarified directions and collapsed or defined items to reduce redundancy. In phase two, 95 comments were generated. Most comments related to aerobic fitness and strenuous PA. Children had difficulty recalling total walking and other activities per day. Children used the weather on a particular day, sports practice, or gym schedules to recall time performing activities. The most comments regarding comprehension were generated about the 3-item PA intensity survey, suggesting children had problems responding to intensity items.

CONCLUSIONS

The newer layout facilitated recall of directions or efficiency in answering items. The 3-item intensity survey was difficult to answer. Sports-specific items helped children more accurately recall the amount of daily PA. The ASCeND appeared to be easy to answer and to comprehend.

PAIN PERCEPTION AND PAIN COPING MECHANISMS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH JUVENILE FIBROMYALGIA AND POLYARTICULAR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS

OBJECTIVE

To measure and compare musculoskeletal pain in patients with juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to evaluate and compare pain perception and pain coping mechanisms in these patients.

METHODS

In this cross sectional study, we evaluated 150 children and adolescents, and their respective parents, from 3 different groups: JFM, polyarticular JIA, and healthy controls. Pain intensity and pain coping mechanisms were measured using specific questionnaires. Pain perception was evaluated according to three illustrations simulating situations that might cause pain: a shot, a bicycle fall, and social isolation. The patients' parents also filled out the questionnaires and provided a pain score that matched their child's perception of pain for each illustration.

RESULTS

The highest pain scores, the lowest pain coping strategy scores, the highest pain perception scores for all three illustrations, and the worse health related to quality of life indicators were observed in the JFM group, when compared to the JIA and control groups. The same pattern was observed with their parents.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with JIA and JFM behave differently in relation to pain perception and the development pain coping mechanisms. Pain should be evaluated from different perspectives for an individualized and efficient treatment of patients.

Cognitive behavioral group intervention for pain and well-being in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a study of feasibility and preliminary efficacy

BACKGROUND

Pain is still a part of everyday living for several children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) despite improvement in treatment. Psychological interventions may contribute to diminish pain complaints and improve well-being in children with JIA. Only few studies have investigated the efficacy of psychological therapy in children with arthritis and with mixed results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy group intervention for children with JIA and their parents.

METHODS

Nineteen children with JIA and their parents were allocated to six sessions' group cognitive-behavioral therapy (n = 9) or a waitlist control condition (n = 10). Results were measured from self-reported scales and one-week pain diaries. Clinical data was collected by a rheumatologist.

RESULTS

The participation rate was low; 33 % of the invited families participated. However, the participants rated the intervention's credibility and satisfaction with the intervention as high. The dropout rate was low and attendance rate high. Increased quality of life and improvements in adaptive pain cognitions was reported in the intervention condition compared to the waitlist condition, whereas no differences were found for pain and functional disability. The disease activity increased in the treatment condition but not in the control condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of this study seemed high with regards to the acceptability of the families participating in the intervention. However, the feasibility in general was challenged by implementation problems with a low participation rate. A reduction in pain after the intervention was not found even though pain management was the main target in the intervention. Preliminary analysis showed that although the severity of the disease status increased, an increase in quality of life, reduction in pain catastrophizing, and an improvement in adaptive pain cognitions (the beliefs in controlling pain and self-efficacy) were seen in the intervention condition. The study highlights the importance of considering the disease status when evaluating the efficacy of a psychological intervention in children with arthritis. Conclusions on the strength of the efficacy require further research in a large, randomized controlled trial.

Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. Persistent pain is the most common and distressing symptom of JIA, and pain in childhood arthritis is multifactorial. Children and adolescents with persistent pain due to JIA experience significantly more problems with physical, emotional, social, and school functioning than healthy individuals. Assessment of pain at each office visit is the cornerstone of effective pain management and should include an evaluation of pain intensity, interference, and coping. Following the biopsychosocial model of pain management, a multi-modal approach is recommended for pain control in children with arthritis. Pharmacologic strategies for the treatment of pain in JIA include aggressive treatment of the underlying disease as well as the use of acetaminophen and systemic and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for persistent mild pain. Opioids can be considered in the case of moderate to severe persistent pain. Physical therapies and psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy are also key components of pain management in JIA.

Using an electronic pain diary to better understand pain in children and adolescents with arthritis

Summary 

AIM

To explore the pain experience of youths (9-18 years old) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, using a real-time data capture electronic pain diary.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A descriptive study design with repeated measures was used. A total of 76 youths, aged 9-18 years old with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were recruited from a Canadian pediatric tertiary care center and asked to record their pain three times a day for 2 weeks using the e-Ouch(©) pain diary.

RESULTS

On average, participants reported mild levels of pain intensity, unpleasantness and interference, as well as stiffness and mild-to-moderate levels of fatigue. Interference of stiffness and pain with activities of daily living were significantly higher in the morning versus the afternoon and evening; while fatigue was significantly higher in the morning and evening compared with the afternoon.

CONCLUSION

Real-time data capture approaches can be used enable a better understanding of how pain and other symptoms in youths with juvenile idiopathic arthritis change within and across days, and how best to treat them. Valuable next steps include incorporating the e-Ouch pain diary into an everyday clinical setting to measure patient outcomes.

Self-reported pain and disease symptoms persist in juvenile idiopathic arthritis despite treatment advances: an electronic diary study

OBJECTIVE

To use electronic diaries (e-diaries) to determine whether pain, stiffness, and fatigue continue to be common, disabling symptoms in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) despite the use of aggressive treatments in contemporary medical management.

METHODS

Fifty-nine children with JIA (ages 8-18 years) provided ratings of pain, stiffness, and fatigue intensity and functional limitations using a smartphone e-diary 3 times each day for 1 month. Medication information was collected via parent report and checked for accuracy by chart review. Descriptive analyses were conducted to determine typical symptom intensity, frequency, and variability. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze associations between symptoms and functional outcomes and between medication use and symptom intensity.

RESULTS

Children reported moments of pain in 66% of e-diary entries. No children were entirely pain-free across the reporting period. In 31% of all e-diary entries the visual analog scale score for pain was >40 (high pain intensity), with 86% of children reporting a high level of pain at least once during the study period. The mean ratings of pain, stiffness, and fatigue intensity were in the mild-to-moderate range. Medication class was not a reliable predictor of differences in symptom intensity, even though 79% of children were prescribed a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and 47% were prescribed a biologic agent. Moments of higher pain intensity and higher stiffness intensity were each uniquely predictive of higher concurrent functional limitations.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported pain, stiffness, and fatigue continue to be common in children with JIA, despite contemporary advances in treatment strategies, including use of biologic agents. These findings are surprisingly consistent with previous results from research using daily paper diaries in the pre-biologics era. There remains a pressing and ongoing need to optimize pain and symptom management in JIA.

Pain experience in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with anti-TNF agents compared to non-biologic standard treatment

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF agents have proven efficacy in children with severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Therefore pain reduction or elimination could be expected. The aim of this study was to compare the pain experience in children with JIA treated with anti-TNF agents (n = 41) or non-biologic standard treatment (n = 50).

METHODS

All children completed a 2-week pain diary and, for children treated with anti-TNF agents, measures of pain-coping and pain-specific beliefs. Parents rated the child's level of functional disability. Clinical data were collected from the pediatric rheumatologists.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the anti-TNF group and non-biologic standard treatment group for average pain score, number of children with daily pain reported in the pain diary, or level of functional disability. Significantly more children in the anti-TNF group reported no pain at all. Children undergoing standard treatment had significantly higher disease activity. Significant differences were found between the high pain patients treated with anti-TNF agents and the rest of the anti-TNF group in regards to their pain-specific beliefs of disability and harm, and the pain-coping strategy of catastrophizing.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that a great proportion of children treated with anti-TNF agents respond well to the treatment in regards to disease activity and pain, but pain was still a problem for a subgroup of children though they were in remission with biological agents. More focus on pain management is needed.

Decreased Pain Threshold in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Study

Objective.

To examine the pain threshold in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) compared with healthy children by using a digital pressure algometer.

Methods.

Fifty-eight children with JIA born between 1995 and 2000 and 91 age-related healthy children participated in the study. We used a digital pressure algometer to measure the pain threshold on 17 symmetric, anatomically predefined joint-related or bone-related areas. All children were asked to rate their current pain on a Faces Pain Scale, and parents of children with JIA were asked to complete a parental revised version of the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ-R). Clinical data were registered on children with JIA.

Results.

The pain threshold was significantly lower among children with JIA (total mean PT = 1.33 ± 0.69 kg/cm2) when compared with the healthy control group (total mean PT = 1.77 ± 0.67 kg/cm2). The same pattern was found in all areas measured, including negative control areas that are normally unaffected in JIA (p = 0.0001 to 0.005). Overall, the pain threshold was 34% lower in females than in males in both groups (p < 0.0001). We found no correlation between pain threshold and age, current pain experience, disease duration, or disease activity.

Conclusion.

Children with JIA had a substantially lower pain threshold even in areas usually unaffected by arthritis. Our findings suggest that JIA alters the pain perception and causes decreased pain threshold.

Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a common chronic childhood illness. Pain is the most common and distressing symptom of JIA. Pain has been found to negatively impact all aspects of functioning, including physical, social, emotional and role functions. Children with arthritis continue to experience clinically significant pain despite adequate doses of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and anti-inflammatory agents. The present article reviews the prevalence and nature of pain in JIA, the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to the pain experience, current approaches to assessing pain in this population, and ways of managing both acute and persistent pain using pharmacological, physical and psychological therapies. Finally, new approaches to delivering disease self-management treatment for youth with JIA using the Internet will be outlined.

Enthesitis-related arthritis is associated with higher pain intensity and poorer health status in comparison with other categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative effect of clinical factors and medications on pain intensity, physical function, and health status in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from children with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. We tested whether clinical characteristics of JIA were associated with pain intensity, physical function, and health status using multivariable linear and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2571 subjects with JIA enrolled in the CARRA Registry. Ratings of pain intensity, physical function, and health status differed significantly between JIA categories. In comparison to other categories of JIA, subjects with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) reported worse pain and function. In multivariable analyses, higher active joint count and current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), biologics, or corticosteroids were associated with worse scores on all patient-reported measures. ERA and older age were significantly associated with higher pain intensity and poorer health status. Systemic JIA and uveitis were significantly associated with worse health status. Enthesitis, sacroiliac tenderness, and NSAID use were independently associated with increased pain intensity in ERA. The correlation was low between physician global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported pain intensity, physical function, and health status.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in pain intensity, physical function, and health status exist among JIA categories. These results suggest that current treatments may not be equally effective for particular disease characteristics more common in specific JIA categories, such as enthesitis or sacroiliac tenderness in ERA.

Early juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Early juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is important to recognize as timely diagnosis and treatment improves prognosis. It is a misconception that complications of JIA arise only from long-standing disease and that children will outgrow it. Early aggressive treatment is the paradigm as early disease activity has long-term consequences. There are predictors of persistent disease and joint erosions that may identify patients at higher risk. Control of disease activity within the first 6 months of onset confers improved clinical course and outcomes. The treatment perspective is thus one of early aggressive treatment for induction of disease control and ultimately remission.

Pain-specific beliefs and pain experience in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

to assess longitudinal associations between pain-specific health beliefs and pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to compare a selected group of patients with high pain and low disease activity (high-pain patients) with the remaining group.

METHODS

forty-seven children with JIA, aged 7-15 years, completed the children's version of the Survey of Pain Attitudes (SOPA-C) and a 3-week pain diary at study entry (T1) and in a followup study 2 years later (T2). Parents also rated the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), and an arthritis activity score was calculated each time. Second-order principal component analysis was conducted to reduce the number of independent variables. Regression analysis of the dependent measure was performed. The use of health beliefs was compared using t test for independent samples.

RESULTS

T1 health beliefs predicted 7% of the variance in T2 pain scores after controlling for T1 pain, CHAQ, and disease activity. At T2, statistical differences were found between the scores of the high-pain group and the rest of the group for the health belief subscales of disability (mean ± SD 2.7 ± 0.5 and 2.2 ± 0.7, respectively) and harm (mean ± SD 3.8 ± 0.8 and 3.3 ± 0.6).

CONCLUSION

our findings suggest that pain beliefs are influential on the longitudinal course of pain in children with JIA. Dysfunctional health beliefs in patients with high pain seem to be stable over time.

Construct validity of a multidimensional electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the construct validity and feasibility of a multidimensional electronic pain diary (e-Ouch(c)) in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Two descriptive studies with repeated measures were conducted between January and December 2005. Participants were drawn from a large metropolitan rheumatology clinic in a university affiliated pediatric tertiary care centre. In Study 1, 76 adolescents with active arthritis recorded their pain three times a day for 2weeks using the e-Ouch(c). In Study 2, 36 adolescents recorded their pain three times a day for 1week before and 2weeks after joint injections. Adolescents in both studies completed multiple measures to determine the construct validity and feasibility of the e-Ouch(c). Adolescents reported mild levels of pain intensity, unpleasantness, and interference as well as stiffness, and mild to moderate levels of fatigue. e-Ouch(c) average weekly pain unpleasantness and interference scores were higher in adolescents with higher pain intensity scores. Correlations between average weekly pain ratings on the e-Ouch(c) and scores from: (a) recalled least, average and worst weekly pain, (b) health-related quality of life and pain coping, and (c) disease activity were as predicted. Pain ratings were significantly lower following joint injections with effect sizes in the low to moderate and moderate to high ranges at the first and second week post-injection, respectively. These findings provide evidence of the construct validity and feasibility of the e-Ouch(c) electronic diary in adolescents with JIA. Use of real-time data capture approaches should be considered in future studies of chronic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), a term referring to a group of disorders characterized by chronic arthritis, is the most common chronic rheumatic illness in children and is a significant cause of short- and long-term disability. This article discusses the classification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of JIA.

Assessment and management of pain syndromes and arthritis pain in children and adolescents

Chronic musculoskeletal pain, whether it is idiopathic or disease-related, is common in childhood. Pediatric rheumatologists and other pediatric health care providers must understand the epidemiology of musculoskeletal pain as part of childhood, diagnose pain syndromes in children and rule out rheumatic disease, and be willing to initiate treatment of pain in children and adolescents. Practitioners' ability to carry out these tasks is enhanced by an awareness of the biopsychosocial model of pain, which integrates biologic, environmental, and cognitive behavioral mechanisms in describing the causes and maintenance of children's pain. A growing body of research in rheumatic diseases, such as JIA, and idiopathic musculoskeletal pain syndromes, such as JPFS, highlights the importance of environmental and cognitive behavioral influences in the pain experience of children in addition to the contribution of disease activity. These influences include factors innate in the child, such as emotional distress, daily stress, coping, and mood, and familial factors, such as parental psychologic health, parental pain history, and the nature of family interactions. Addressing these issues, while providing aggressive traditional medical management, optimizes pain treatment and improves overall quality of life for children who have musculoskeletal pain.

Treatment of chronic pain in pediatric rheumatic disease

Pain in children with rheumatic disease is common, and is most often caused by arthritis. Despite the widespread use of effective new biologic agents, pain continues to be a problem in these patients, and it greatly impairs their daily functioning and quality of life. The pathogenesis of pain in children with rheumatic diseases is multifactorial, and disease treatment alone is often not enough to alleviate it. No standard of care or detailed algorithm for managing pain in these patients exists. Specific pain treatments often include acetaminophen, NSAIDs and medications that treat arthritis, such as methotrexate and etanercept. Other approaches should include nonpharmacologic interventions, for example exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy, as well as the use of analgesics such as opioids in patients whose pain is refractory to standard therapies. The use of systemic corticosteroids to treat pain in children with arthritis should be avoided.

Pain in children with rheumatic diseases

Pain is common in rheumatic diseases in children. Despite recent advances in arthritis treatment, pain continues to be a problem impacting daily functioning and quality of life, and no standard of care for pain management exists. The pathogenesis of pain in children with rheumatic diseases is multifactorial, and treatment of the disease alone may not be enough. Current pain treatment often includes acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and medications that treat arthritis such as methotrexate and etanercept. Nonpharmacologic interventions, such as exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy as well as the use of analgesics such as opioids in patients whose pain is refractory to standard therapies, should also be considered. The use of systemic corticosteroids to treat pain in children with arthritis should be avoided. Idiopathic pain may coexist in children with rheumatic disease, but treatment of idiopathic pain is different than that of pain due to inflammatory disorders.

Level of agreement between children, parents, and physicians in rating pain intensity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the level of agreement between patients, mothers, fathers, and physicians in rating pain intensity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and to identify factors explaining discrepancies between raters.

METHODS

Ninety-four children with JIA and their mothers and fathers were asked to rate independently the intensity of present pain and pain in the previous week on a visual analog scale. The physicians rated pain intensity after physical examination. Agreement between raters was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman method. Correlations of explanatory variables with discordance in rating pain intensity were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Explanatory variables included sex, age, JIA category, disease duration, results of study ratings, joint inflammation measures, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

RESULTS

Agreement in rating present pain was moderate between children and mothers, but was poor between children and fathers and children and physicians. The agreement in rating pain in the previous week was moderate between children and mothers and children and fathers. Mother-father agreement was good. Parents and physicians agreed at a moderate level. In multiple regression analyses, only intensity of present pain was significantly associated with discordance within child-mother, child-father, and child-physician dyads.

CONCLUSION

Children's ratings of pain were only in moderate agreement with those of their parents and were in poor agreement with those of the physicians, whereas the father and mothers agreed at a good level. The intensity of pain was the strongest determinant of discordance between children and other raters.

Longitudinal relationships of depressive symptoms to pain intensity and functional disability among children with disease-related pain

OBJECTIVE

To examine the longitudinal relationship between depressive symptoms at study entry (T1) on pain intensity (PI) and functional disability over a 1-year period among children with either sickle cell disease (SCD) or juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

119 children, ages 8-17 years, completed measures of depression at T1 as well as pain and functional disability at T1, 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) follow-ups. Caregivers also rated their child's pain and disability at each time point. General linear mixed modeling was employed to examine longitudinal relationships between study variables.

RESULTS

For children with JIA, T1 pain significantly moderated the effects of T1-depressive symptoms on T2 and T3 pain where T1-depressive symptoms predicted future child-reported pain only when T1 pain was relatively mild. Similarly, T1-depressive symptoms predicted future child-reported disability only when initial reports of disability were relatively low. Only family income significantly predicted T2 and T3 pain in children with SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest that T1-depressive symptoms play a role in the longitudinal course of pain symptoms in children with JIA but not in children with SCD.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), a term referring to a group of disorders characterized by chronic arthritis, is the most common chronic rheumatic illness in children and is a significant cause of short- and long-term disability. This article discusses the classification, differential diagnosis, and treatment of JIA.

Pediatric pain syndromes and management of pain in children and adolescents with rheumatic disease

This article introduces important issues related to pain in children with musculoskeletal pain syndromes and rheumatic disease, using juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) as models. A brief summary of the prevalence of pain in healthy children is followed by a summary of existing pain-assessment techniques. The remainder of the article describes the pain experience of children with JPFS and JIA and discusses issues related to pain management.

Relationship of pain-coping strategies and pain-specific beliefs to pain experience in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether pain-specific beliefs and coping strategies of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) independently predict their reported pain, while controlling for relevant demographic variables, disease activity, and parent-rated disability. To compare use of pain-coping strategies and pain-related beliefs of a selected subgroup of patients with high pain and low disease activity (high pain group) with the remaining patients.

METHODS

Children with JIA (n = 56) completed the Pain Coping Questionnaire, a revised version of the Survey of Pain Attitudes, and a 3-week pain diary. The parents completed the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Second order principal component analyses were conducted in order to reduce the number of independent variables. Regression analyses of the dependent measure were performed. The use of coping strategies and health beliefs were compared using t-tests for independent samples. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the direct associations between each individual coping and belief scale, and the pain measure.

RESULTS

Only the CHAQ and the cognitive belief composite factor score made statistically significant contribution to the prediction of pain after controlling for other variables. Significant differences were found between the scores of high pain patients and the rest of the group for the health belief subscale of disability (mean +/- SD 2.0 +/- 0.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.7, respectively), and for the health belief subscale of harm (mean +/- SD 2.7 +/- 0.6 and 1.8 +/- 0.7, respectively). Significant correlations were obtained between the pain measure and the pain-coping subscale of catastrophizing, the pain belief subscales of disability, harm, solicitude (inverse), control, and medical cure.

CONCLUSION

These results support a model of pain experience in patients with JIA where psychological factors are strongly influential. It may be efficient to focus behavioral interventions on a subgroup of children where the pain experience seems to be in discordance with the disease activity.

Predictors of pain in children with established juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To examine demographic and disease-related variables that affect pain in a large cohort of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODS

Selection criteria were an onset of JRA >/=5 years prior to study and age >/=8 years at the time of the study. Pain was measured by a self-administered 10-cm visual analog scale. Possible explanatory variables studied included age at study, sex, race, onset subtype, active disease duration, active joint count, and physician's global assessment (PGA).

RESULTS

In a multiple regression model, active disease duration, PGA, and age at study were independent predictors explaining 22% of the variation in pain scores. Stratified analyses showed an effect of age in the 8-15-year group, but not in older patients.

CONCLUSION

Disease-related factors explain only a small proportion of the variation in pain scores. Age has an effect on pain scores only in younger patients. The role of other factors, including psychosocial factors, needs further study.

Daily pain and symptoms in children with polyarticular arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patterns of daily pain, stiffness, and fatigue related to juvenile arthritis; to examine the relationships of demographics, disease severity, and psychological adjustment to daily disease symptoms; and to examine daily disease symptoms as predictors of reduced participation in school and social activity.

METHODS

For a 2-month period, 41 children with polyarticular juvenile arthritis completed daily diaries that included measures of symptoms and function. Children also underwent an initial evaluation and 4 followup evaluations that included a joint count, laboratory testing, and completion of questionnaires assessing physical and psychosocial functioning.

RESULTS

Children reported having pain an average of 73% of days, with the majority of children (76%) reporting pain on >60% of all days. On average, children described the intensity of their daily pain as being in the mild to moderate range; however, a significant subgroup (31%) reported pain in the severe range. Higher physician global assessment ratings, increased functional disability, and increased anxiety were significantly associated with increased daily pain and other daily symptoms. Multilevel random-effects analyses indicated that increased daily symptoms of pain, stiffness, and fatigue were significant predictors of reduced participation in school and social activities.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should consider treating pain more aggressively in children with arthritis, in order to preserve function in school and social domains, as well as physical function. Moreover, optimal pain management in children with arthritis should include therapeutic regimens addressing anxiety as well as standard pharmacologic interventions.

Ten-year review of rating scales. III: scales assessing suicidality, cognitive style, and self-esteem

OBJECTIVE

This is the third article in a series of 10-year reviews of rating scales. Here, the authors review scales that are useful in tapping the affective disturbances experienced with various psychiatric disorders, including suicidality, cognitive style, and self-esteem.

METHOD

The authors sampled articles incorporating these constructs over the past 25 years and selected scales with established uses or new development. Those presented here have adequate psychometric properties and high utility for efficiently elucidating youths' functioning, plus either wide literature citations or a special niche.

RESULTS

These scales were developed bimodally. Many were developed in the 1980s when internalizing disorders were elucidated, but there has been a resurgence of interest in these constructs. Scales assessing suicidality have clear constructs, whereas scales of cognitive style demonstrate deficits in developmental relevance, and scales of self-esteem suffer from lax constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructs underlying these scales tap core symptoms of internalizing disorders, mediate the expression of affective disturbances associated with various disorders, and depict the impairments resulting from these disorders. Overall, the psychometrics of these scales are adequate. These scales provide a broader representation of youths' functioning than that conveyed with diagnostic scales alone.

Effects of an eight-week physical conditioning program on disease signs and symptoms in children with chronic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of an 8-week, 24-session weight-bearing physical conditioning program on disease signs and symptoms in children with chronic arthritis.

METHODS

In a within-subjects, repeated measures design, 25 subjects, ages 8-17 years, with chronic polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), were assessed at study entry, after an 8-week control period, and after an 8-week exercise period, for 1) disease status, based on joint count (JC) and articular severity index (ASI) (sum of scores for joint swelling, pain on motion, tenderness, and limitations of motion); 2) worst pain during the past week, using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), and 3) aerobic endurance, using the 9-minute run-walk test of the Health Related Physical Fitness Test battery. The 60-minute conditioning program included warm-up (10 minutes), low-impact aerobics (25 minutes), strengthening (15 minutes), and cool-down and flexibility exercises (10 minutes). Subjects exercised twice a week at their rheumatology center and once a week at home, using a commercial exercise video-tape supplied by the investigator.

RESULTS

Significant improvement was found in the ASI (Friedman analysis of variance [ANOVA]), JC, and 9-minute run-walk test (repeated measures ANOVA) from the pre- to post-exercise tests. Mean VAS pain scores decreased 16% from study entry to the post-exercise test. Statistically significant improvement (reliable change index > 1.96) occurred in 80% of subjects on the ASI and 72% on the JC.

CONCLUSION

Children and adolescents with chronic polyarticular JRA can improve their aerobic endurance through participation in weight-bearing physical conditioning programs without disease exacerbation or increased pain, and may achieve decreased joint signs and symptoms through increased physical activity.

Causes of pain in children with arthritis

Pain in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) is often not fully recognized and is therefore incompletely treated. The use of pain assessment instruments developed specifically for children may enhance recognition by health care providers. Recent studies suggest that coping variables and disease severity are significant predictors of pain in children with JRA. Pain in children with JRA is a complex phenomenon, best managed using a multidisciplinary approach that includes aggressive traditional medical management and addresses psychosocial variables such as coping strategies and perceptions about disease.

Cold pressor pain: comparing responses of juvenile arthritis patients and their parents

The objective of this study was to compare the reactions to experimental cold pressor pain of Juvenile Arthritis (JA) patients, healthy children, and their parents.

METHODS

We compared pain threshold, discomfort, intensity, and tolerance to experimental cold pressor pain in 15 JA patients (age 9-15) and one of their parents and a control group of 25 healthy children (age 9-12) and one of their parents.

RESULTS

JA-patients exhibited significantly lower mean pain tolerance than healthy children. Pain tolerance correlated significantly with disease duration. Parents of JA-patients showed significantly greater mean pain intensity than parents of healthy children, and had higher estimates of their child's ability to endure pain than parents of healthy children. Correlations were found between pain scores of children and their parents for both pain intensity and tolerance. The pain coping category of Catastrophizing was associated with several of the experimental pain response measures.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that JA patients may differ from healthy children with regard to their responses to experimental pain, and that pain responses of both JA patients and healthy children could be related to the pain response of their parents.