In vitro and In silico biopharmaceutic regulatory guidelines for generic bioequivalence for oral products: Comparison among various regulatory agencies

A Semi-Mechanistic Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model to Describe Complex and Saturable Absorption of Metformin: Justification of Dissolution Specifications for Extended Release Formulation

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) or physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) demonstrated plethora of applications in both new drugs and generic product development. Justification of dissolution specifications and establishment of dissolution safe space is an important application of such modeling approaches. In case of molecules exhibiting saturable absorption behavior, justification of dissolution specifications requires development of a model that incorporates effects of transporters is critical to simulate in vivo scenario. In the present case, we have developed a semi-mechanistic PBBM to describe the non-linearity of BCS class III molecule metformin for justification of dissolution specifications of extended release formulation at strengths 500 mg and 1000 mg. Semi-mechanistic PBBM was built using physicochemical properties, dissolution and non-linearity was accounted through incorporation of multiple transporter kinetics at absorption level. The model was extensively validated using literature reported intravenous, oral (immediate & extended release) formulations and further validated using in-house bioequivalence data in fasting and fed conditions. Virtual dissolution profiles at lower and upper specifications were generated to justify the dissolution specifications. The model predicted literature as well as in-house clinical study data with acceptable prediction errors. Further, virtual bioequivalence trials predicted the bioequivalence outcome that matched with clinical study data. The model predicted bioequivalence when lower and upper specifications were compared against pivotal test formulations thereby justifying dissolution specifications. Overall, complex and saturable absorption pathway of metformin was successfully simulated and this work resulted in regulatory acceptance of dissolution specifications which has ability to reduce multiple dissolution testing.

Predictive Modelling in pharmacokinetics: from in-silico simulations to personalized medicine

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic parameters assessment is a critical aspect of drug discovery and development, yet challenges persist due to limited training data. Despite advancements in machine learning and in-silico predictions, scarcity of data hampers accurate prediction of drug candidates' pharmacokinetic properties.

AREAS COVERED

The study highlights current developments in human pharmacokinetic prediction, talks about attempts to apply synthetic approaches for molecular design, and searches several databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The article stresses importance of rigorous analysis of machine learning model performance in assessing progress and explores molecular modeling (MM) techniques, descriptors, and mathematical approaches. Transitioning to clinical drug development, article highlights AI (Artificial Intelligence) based computer models optimizing trial design, patient selection, dosing strategies, and biomarker identification. In-silico models, including molecular interactomes and virtual patients, predict drug performance across diverse profiles, underlining the need to align model results with clinical studies for reliability. Specialized training for human specialists in navigating predictive models is deemed critical. Pharmacogenomics, integral to personalized medicine, utilizes predictive modeling to anticipate patient responses, contributing to more efficient healthcare system. Challenges in realizing potential of predictive modeling, including ethical considerations and data privacy concerns, are acknowledged.

EXPERT OPINION

AI models are crucial in drug development, optimizing trials, patient selection, dosing, and biomarker identification and hold promise for streamlining clinical investigations.

Dissolution Profiles Comparison Using Conventional and Bias Corrected and Accelerated f2 Bootstrap Approaches with Different Software's: Impact of Variability, Sample Size and Number of Bootstraps

Dissolution profiles comparison is an important element in order to support biowaivers, scale-up and post approval changes and site transfers. Highly variable dissolution can possess significant challenges for comparison and f2 bootstrap approach can be utilized in such cases. However, availability of different types of f2 and confidence intervals (CI) methods indicates necessity to understand each type of calculation thoroughly. Among all approaches, bias corrected and accelerated (BCa) can be an attractive choice as it corrects the bias and skewness of the distribution. In this manuscript, we have performed comparison of highly variable dissolution data using various software's by adopting percentile and BCa CI approaches. Diverse data with different variability's, number of samples and bootstraps were evaluated with JMP, DDSolver, R-software, SAS and PhEq. While all software's yielded similar observed f2 values, differences in lower percentile CI was observed. BCa with R-software and JMP provided superior lower percentile as compared to other computations. Expected f2 recommended by EMA has resulted as stringent criteria as compared to estimated f2. No impact of number of bootstraps on similarity analysis was observed whereas number of samples increased chance of acceptance. Variability has impacted similarity outcome with estimated f2 but chance of acceptance enhanced with BCa approach. Further, freely available R-software can be of attractive choice due to computation of various types of f2, percentile and BCa intervals. Overall, this work can enable regulatory submissions to enhance probability of similarity through appropriate selection of number of samples, technique based on variability of dissolution data.

Novel application of PBBM to justify impact of faster dissolution on safety and pharmacokinetics - a case study and utility in regulatory justifications

Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modelling (PBBM) was recognised as potential approach for biopharmaceutics applications. However, PBBM to justify safety is an unexplored area.In this manuscript, we elucidated PBBM application for safety justification. Product DRL is a generic extended release tablet containing an anti-epileptic narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drug. During dossier review, regulatory agency requested to evaluate the impact of faster dissolution profiles observed during stability on safety aspects. In order to justify, PBBMbased strategy was adapted.Model was validated and population simulations were performed for reference and test formulations and the predictions matched with clinical outcome. The model was found to be sensitive to dissolution changes and hence applied for the prediction of stability batches exhibiting faster dissolution profiles, virtually generated profiles at lower and upper specifications. The maximum predicted plasma levels were well below the reported safety levels, thereby demonstrating safety of the product.Overall, a novel application of PBBM to justify safety was demonstrated. Similar justifications using PBBM and linking with safety can be adopted where safety can be impacted due to aggravated dissolution profiles. Such justifications have potential to avoid clinical safety studies and helps in faster approval of drug product.

Biopharmaceutics Risk Assessment-Connecting Critical Bioavailability Attributes with In Vitro, In Vivo Properties and Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling to Enable Generic Regulatory Submissions

Quality risk assessment following ICH Q9 principles is an important activity to ensure optimal clinical efficacy and safety of a drug product. Typically, risk assessment is focused on product performance wherein critical material attributes, formulation variables, and process parameters are evaluated from a manufacturing perspective. Extending ICH Q9 principles to biopharmaceutics risk assessment to identify factors that can impact in vivo performance is an upcoming area. This is evident by recent regulatory trends wherein a new term critical bioavailability attributes (CBA) has been coined to identify such factors. Although significant work has been performed for biopharmaceutics risk assessment for new molecules, there is a need for harmonized biopharmaceutics risk assessment workflow for generic submissions. In this manuscript, we attempted to provide a framework for performing biopharmaceutics risk assessment for generic regulatory submissions. A detailed workflow for performing biopharmaceutics risk assessment includes identification of initial CBA (iCBA), their confirmatory evaluation followed by definition of the control strategy. Tools for biopharmaceutics risk assessment, i.e., bio-discriminatory dissolution method and physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) were discussed from a practical perspective. Furthermore, a case study for CBA evaluation using PBBM modeling for an extended-release product for regulatory submission has been described using the proposed workflow. Finally, future directions of integrating CBA evaluation, biopharmaceutics risk assessment to the FDA Knowledge Aided Structured Assessment (KASA) initiative, the necessity of risk assessment templates, and knowledge sharing between industry and academia are discussed. Overall, the work described in this manuscript can facilitate and provide guidance for biopharmaceutics risk assessment for generic submissions.

Power of Integrating PBPK with PBBM (PBPK-BM): A Single Model Predicting Food Effect, Gender Impact, Drug-Drug Interactions and Bioequivalence in Fasting & Fed Conditions

Over the past few years, PBPK and PBBM modeling have proven their significance in drug development. PBPK modeling is traditionally used to predict drug-drug interactions, exposures in special populations whereas PBBM modeling is a part of PBPK modeling that is used for a range of biopharmaceutics applications.Because of these differences in utilities, often PBPK and PBBM models are developed separately. When both models are combined, they serve multiple purposes through unified model. In the present case, an integrated PBPK-PBBM model for an IR product has been utilized for bioequivalence prediction in fasting & fed conditions, evaluating gender impact and food effect, prediction of drug-drug interactions.Model was built using physicochemical properties, enzymes and transporter kinetics, bio-predictive dissolution and has been validated with passing and failed pilot BE studies. The validated model predicted pivotal bioequivalence outcome in fasting & fed conditions accurately, predicted gender impact and food effect in line with literature. Drug-drug interactions arising from transporter and metabolizing enzymes were predicted accurately.Overall, this work demonstrates utility of combining PBPK and PBBM model that can yield a single model which can be used for multiple purposes, regulatory justifications and can reduce regulatory review timelines.

Best Practices for Integration of Dissolution Data into Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBM): A Biopharmaceutics Modeling Scientist Perspective

Dissolution is considered as a critical input into physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) as it governs in vivo exposure. Despite many workshops, initiatives by academia, industry, and regulatory, wider practices are followed for dissolution data input into PBBM models. Due to variety of options available for dissolution data input into PBBM models, it is important to understand pros, cons, and best practices while using specific dissolution model. This present article attempts to summarize current understanding of various dissolution models and data inputs in PBBM software's and aims to discuss practical challenges and ways to overcome such scenarios. Different approaches to incorporate dissolution data for immediate, modified, and delayed release formulations are discussed in detail. Common challenges faced during fitting of z-factor are discussed along with novel approach of dissolution data incorporation using P-PSD model. Ways to incorporate dissolution data for MR formulations using Weibull and IVIVR approaches were portrayed with examples. Strategies to incorporate dissolution data for DR formulations was depicted along with practical aspects. Approaches to generate virtual dissolution profiles, using Weibull function, DDDPlus, and time scaling for defining dissolution safe space, and strategies to generate virtual dissolution profiles for justifying single and multiple dissolution specifications were discussed. Finally, novel ways to integrate dissolution data for complex products such as liposomes, data from complex dissolution systems, importance of precipitation, and bio-predictive ability of QC media for evaluation of CBA's impact were discussed. Overall, this article aims to provide an easy guide for biopharmaceutics modeling scientist to integrate dissolution data effectively into PBBM models.

Utility of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Regulatory Perspective: Application to Supersede f2, Enabling Biowaivers & Creation of Dissolution Safe Space

Product DRL is a generic IR tablet formulation with BCS Class-III API, available in two strengths: 50mg & 100mg. The reference and test formulations have salt-A & salt-B of API but both products were bioequivalent based on the in vivo bioequivalence study conducted for higher strength 100mg. While leveraging the generic product to different market, the reference product from other market showed slower release than generic formulation resulting in f2<50 in pH 6.8 for both 50mg and 100mg, because of which waiver for BE study couldn't be granted. To support f2 mismatch at 100mg, 50mg and to facilitate biowaiver of 50mg, a Gastroplus® PBBM model was developed & validated. Virtual bioequivalence trials were performed using the slower dissolution profile of other market reference. It was demonstrated that despite slower dissolution, bioequivalence was achieved for test product against other market reference for 50mg & 100mg strengths. Additionally, dissolution safe space was created using virtual dissolution profiles, which indicated that when >85% released up to 60 min there is no impact on bioequivalence. Overall, for molecules with permeability controlled absorption (i.e. BCS-III), very rapid dissolution criteria can be relaxed by defining dissolution safe space thereby enabling more waivers in future.

A Novel Approach to Justify Dissolution Differences in an Extended Release Drug Product Using Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling and Simulation

Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. developed generic version of XYZ extended release tablets (ER) and achieved bioequivalence as per criteria mentioned by USFDA in both fasting and fed conditions for higher strength formulation (1200 mg). However, on comparison of multimedia dissolution profiles in pH 4.5 acetate media, the f2 similarity value was <50. The lower strength formulation (600 mg) demonstrated faster dissolution profile. This was identified as strength-dependent sink condition difference and in vitro multiunit dissolution studies were used to justify sink differences between the higher and lower strengths. Additionally, a Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model (PBBM) was developed using GastroPlus^TM. The validity of this model was established using in-house human pharmacokinetic data. Further, this model was used to justify the insignificant in vivo impact of the faster dissolution profile for the lower strength formulation. This work provides a novel and less explored approach that can be used to obtain biowaiver for lower strength formulations when the standard biowaiver criteria cannot be met. This work also demonstrates the usefulness of PBBM to justify dissolution dissimilarity between dose proportional formulations and to evaluate its biopharmaceutics risk without the need for actual in vivo studies.