1
|
Lv Q, Shu XP, Peng D, Li SQ, Xiang Z. Predictors of complications after prophylactic ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1354-1362. [PMID: 38817282 PMCID: PMC11135311 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have analyzed the risk factors for complications after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer (RC), but there were significant differences in the reported risk factors for complications after stoma reversal. No studies have analyzed the risk factors for stoma-related complications and overall postoperative complications separately. AIM To analyze the risk factors for overall complications and stoma-related complications after ileostomy reversal for patients with RC. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 439 patients who underwent ileostomy reversal at a clinical center and were followed up between September 2012 and September 2022. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed with independent-sample t tests, while frequency variables are expressed as n (%), and the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of overall complications and stoma-related complications. RESULTS The overall complication rate after ileostomy reversal was 11.4%. Patients with lower preoperative albumin concentration (P < 0.01), greater blood loss (P = 0.017), and longer operative times (P < 0.01) were more likely to experience postoperative complications. The incidence of stoma-related complications was 6.4%. Analysis of the study showed that a higher body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.01), preoperative comorbid hypertension (P = 0.049), time from primary surgery to ileostomy reversal (P < 0.01) and longer operation time (P = 0.010) were more likely to result in stoma-related complications postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a lower preoperative albumin level (P < 0.01, OR = 0.888, 95%CI: 0.828-0.958) was an independent risk factor for overall complications. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that BMI (P < 0.01, OR = 1.176, 95%CI: 1.041-1.330) and time from primary surgery to ileostomy reversal (P < 0.01, OR = 1.140, 95%CI: 1.038-1.252) were independent risk factors for stoma-related complications after stoma reversal. CONCLUSION The preoperative albumin level was a predictor of overall complications. Preoperative BMI and the time from primary surgery to ileostomy reversal were predictors of stoma-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quan Lv
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Xin-Peng Shu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Dong Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Si-Qi Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Zheng Xiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ascari F, Barugola G, Ruffo G. Diverting ileostomy in benign colorectal surgery: the real clinical cost analysis. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01879-3. [PMID: 38801603 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01879-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
There are three types of complications stoma related: ones related to its construction, ones related to its function and related to closure. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of complications related to the stoma presence and to identificate variables related to complications. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent sphincter-preserving elective surgery for benign condition between January 2013 and December 2020 at IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital in Negrar, Verona. Data were collected regarding demographics and complications associated with primary surgery, stoma closure and the interval period. Univariable and multivariable analysIs were conducted. A total of 446 (12.2%) diverting loop ileostomies were performed. At index procedure, 76 (17%) patients had complications and 34 patients had complications related to ileostomy creation. Twenty patients (4.4%) were re admitted before stoma closure for dehydration. One hundred and eighty-seven patients (41.9%) suffered from ileostomy management's problems. At univariate analysis, complications of having stoma are more frequent in elder patients (p = 0.013), ASA score > 2 (p = 0.02), IBD diagnosis (p = < 0.001) and patients who had ileostomy creation complications (p = 0.04). At stoma closure, 55 (12.3%) patients had complications. Forty-seven patients (10.5%) presented incisional hernia in the stoma closure site. Ileostomy closure complications are more common with ASA score > 2 (p = 0.01) and IBD diagnosis (p < 0.001). IBD was found an independent factor of poor outcome at the time of ileostomy creation and closure. Developing complications at the time of ileostomy creation is statistically related to develop complications during ileostomy maintenance at multivariable analysis A loop ileostomy is usually created to limit the potentially life-threatening consequenceS of anastomotic leakage, but it is not able to decrease the leak-related mortality, wound sepsis, postoperative bleeding and small bowel obstruction. Debate rises not only for its uncertain efficacy but also because of the significant morbidity related to stoma. The surgeon could use these data in order to tailor his surgical strategy to the patients and their disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ascari
- Chirurgia Generale Ospedale Ramazzini, AUSLModena, Carpi, Modena, Italy.
| | - G Barugola
- Chirurgia Generale IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, NegrarDiValpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - G Ruffo
- Chirurgia Generale IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, NegrarDiValpolicella, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu GXH, Milne T, Xu W, Varghese C, Keane C, O'Grady G, Bissett IP, Wells CI. Risk prediction algorithms for prolonged postoperative ileus: A systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2024. [PMID: 38698504 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is common and is associated with a significant healthcare burden. Previous studies have attempted to predict PPOI clinically using risk prediction algorithms. The aim of this work was to systematically review and compare risk prediction algorithms for PPOI following colorectal surgery. METHOD A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus. Studies that developed and/or validated a risk prediction algorithm for PPOI in adults following colorectal surgery were included. Data were collected on study design, population and operative characteristics, the definition of PPOI used and risk prediction algorithm design and performance. Quality appraisal was assessed using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS Eleven studies with 87 549 participants were included in our review. Most were retrospective, single-centre analyses (6/11, 55%) and rates of PPOI varied from 10% to 28%. The most commonly used variables were sex (8/11, 73%), age (6/11, 55%) and surgical approach (5/11, 45%). Area under the curve ranged from 0.68-0.78, and only three models were validated. However, there was significant variation in the definition of PPOI used. No study reported sensitivity, specificity or positive/negative predictive values. CONCLUSION Currently available risk prediction algorithms for PPOI appear to discriminate moderately well, although there is a lack of validation data. Future studies should aim to use a standardized definition of PPOI, comprehensively report model performance and validate their findings using internal and external methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Xin Hua Liu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tony Milne
- Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Counties Manukau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - William Xu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Celia Keane
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Whangarei Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Te Tai Tokerau, Northland, New Zealand
| | - Greg O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ian P Bissett
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cameron I Wells
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruan X, Fu S, Jia H, Mathis KL, Thiels CA, Wilson PM, Storlie CB, Liu H. Revolutionizing Postoperative Ileus Monitoring: Exploring GRU-D's Real-Time Capabilities and Cross-Hospital Transferability. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.04.24.24306295. [PMID: 38712199 PMCID: PMC11071561 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.24.24306295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Background Postoperative ileus (POI) after colorectal surgery leads to increased morbidity, costs, and hospital stays. Identifying POI risk for early intervention is important for improving surgical outcomes especially given the increasing trend towards early discharge after surgery. While existing studies have assessed POI risk with regression models, the role of deep learning's remains unexplored. Methods We assessed the performance and transferability (brutal force/instance/parameter transfer) of Gated Recurrent Unit with Decay (GRU-D), a longitudinal deep learning architecture, for real-time risk assessment of POI among 7,349 colorectal surgeries performed across three hospital sites operated by Mayo Clinic with two electronic health records (EHR) systems. The results were compared with atemporal models on a panel of benchmark metrics. Results GRU-D exhibits robust transferability across different EHR systems and hospital sites, showing enhanced performance by integrating new measurements, even amid the extreme sparsity of real-world longitudinal data. On average, for labs, vitals, and assisted living status, 72.2%, 26.9%, and 49.3% respectively lack measurements within 24 hours after surgery. Over the follow-up period with 4-hour intervals, 98.7%, 84%, and 95.8% of data points are missing, respectively. A maximum of 5% decrease in AUROC was observed in brutal-force transfer between different EHR systems with non-overlapping surgery date frames. Multi-source instance transfer witnessed the best performance, with a maximum of 2.6% improvement in AUROC over local learning. The significant benefit, however, lies in the reduction of variance (a maximum of 86% decrease). The GRU-D model's performance mainly depends on the prediction task's difficulty, especially the case prevalence rate. Whereas the impact of training data and transfer strategy is less crucial, underscoring the challenge of effectively leveraging transfer learning for rare outcomes. While atemporal Logit models show notably superior performance at certain pre-surgical points, their performance fluctuate significantly and generally underperform GRU-D in post-surgical hours. Conclusion GRU-D demonstrated robust transferability across EHR systems and hospital sites with highly sparse real-world EHR data. Further research on built-in explainability for meaningful intervention would be highly valuable for its integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyang Ruan
- McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
- Department of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sunyang Fu
- McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
- Department of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Heling Jia
- Department of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Patrick M Wilson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Curtis B Storlie
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Hongfang Liu
- McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
- Department of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balla A, Saraceno F, Rullo M, Morales-Conde S, Targarona Soler EM, Di Saverio S, Guerrieri M, Lepiane P, Di Lorenzo N, Adamina M, Alarcón I, Arezzo A, Bollo Rodriguez J, Boni L, Biondo S, Carrano FM, Chand M, Jenkins JT, Davies J, Delgado Rivilla S, Delrio P, Elmore U, Espin-Basany E, Fichera A, Flor Lorente B, Francis N, Gómez Ruiz M, Hahnloser D, Licardie E, Martinez C, Ortenzi M, Panis Y, Pastor Idoate C, Paganini AM, Pera M, Perinotti R, Popowich DA, Rockall T, Rosati R, Sartori A, Scoglio D, Shalaby M, Simó Fernández V, Smart NJ, Spinelli A, Sylla P, Tanis PJ, Valdes-Hernandez J, Wexner SD, Sileri P. Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum: Shared decision-making or still subjective? Colorectal Dis 2022; 25:647-659. [PMID: 36527323 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. METHOD Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed. RESULTS Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases. Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). CONCLUSION The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Balla
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Saraceno
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy.,Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Marika Rullo
- Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Salvador Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eduardo M Targarona Soler
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- ASUR Marche 5, San Benedetto del Tronto General Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lepiane
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isaias Alarcón
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Jesus Bollo Rodriguez
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Manish Chand
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - John T Jenkins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, North West London NHS Trust, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Eloy Espin-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Fichera
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas, Dallas, USA
| | - Blas Flor Lorente
- Digestive Surgery Department, 'La Fe' University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK
| | - Marcos Gómez Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.,Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Eugenio Licardie
- Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Carmen Martinez
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Carlos Pastor Idoate
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Clinic of Navarre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandro M Paganini
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel Pera
- Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Perinotti
- Department of General Surgery, SS Colo-Rectal and Proctological Surgery, Biella Hospital, Ponderano, Biella, Italy
| | | | - Timothy Rockall
- General Surgery at Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Daniele Scoglio
- Department of General Surgery, AULSS 4 Veneto Orientale, San Donà di Piave General Hospital, San Donà di Piave, Italy
| | - Mostafa Shalaby
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | | | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Valdes-Hernandez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Florida, Weston, USA
| | - Pierpaolo Sileri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu C, Bhat S, Bissett I, O’Grady G. A review of chyme reinfusion: new tech solutions for age old problems. J R Soc N Z 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2117832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Liu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sameer Bhat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ian Bissett
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- The Insides Company Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora (Te Toka Tumai Auckland), Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gregory O’Grady
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- The Insides Company Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland City Hospital, Te Whatu Ora (Te Toka Tumai Auckland), Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garfinkle R, Demian M, Sabboobeh S, Moon J, Hulme-Moir M, Liberman AS, Feinberg S, Hayden DM, Chadi SA, Demyttenaere S, Samuel L, Hotakorzian N, Quintin L, Morin N, Faria J, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M. Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3934-3943. [PMID: 35984521 PMCID: PMC9390101 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09510-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative bowel stimulation on the development of postoperative ileus (POI) after loop ileostomy closure. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT025596350) including adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent elective loop ileostomy closure at 7 participating hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralized computer-generated sequence with block randomization to either preoperative bowel stimulation or no stimulation (control group). Bowel stimulation consisted of 10 outpatient sessions within the 3 weeks prior to ileostomy closure and was performed by trained Enterostomal Therapy nurses. The primary outcome was POI, defined as an intolerance to oral food in the absence of clinical or radiological signs of obstruction, on or after postoperative day 3, that either (a) required nasogastric tube insertion; or (b) was associated with two of the following: nausea/vomiting, abdominal distension, or the absence of flatus. Results Between January 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients were randomized, and 5 patients never underwent ileostomy closure; thus, 96 patients (47 stimulated vs. 49 control) were analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat protocol. Baseline characteristics were well balanced in both groups. The incidence of POI was lower among patients randomized to stimulation (6.4% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.034; unadjusted RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.078–0.87). Stimulated patients also had earlier median time to first flatus (2.0 days (1.0–2.0) vs. 2.0 days (2.0–3.0), p = 0.025), were more likely to pass flatus on postoperative day 1 (46.8% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.022), and had a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (3.0 days (2.0–3.5) vs. 4.0 days (2.0–6.0), p = 0.003). Conclusions Preoperative bowel stimulation via the efferent limb of the ileostomy reduced POI after elective loop ileostomy closure. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09510-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Garfinkle
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie Demian
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Sabboobeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeongyoon Moon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - A Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stan Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dana M Hayden
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Sami A Chadi
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Louise Samuel
- Department of Nursing, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Laurence Quintin
- Department of Nursing, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nancy Morin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio Faria
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ghitulescu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine, G-317, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nakao T, Shimada M, Yoshikawa K, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Kashihara H, Takasu C, Wada Y, Yoshimoto T, Yamashita S, Iwakawa Y. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after diverting loop ileostomy closure. BMC Surg 2022; 22:131. [PMID: 35392877 PMCID: PMC8991585 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01583-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus is one of the most common complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure. Some reports have investigated the risk factors for postoperative complications or ileus after ileostomy closure; however, these studies did not evaluate the index surgery sufficiently. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors, including the details of the index surgery, for ileus after diverting ileostomy closure. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent ileostomy closure following index surgery for rectal cancer. Patients who developed postoperative ileus [POI (+)] and patients who did not [POI (-)] after ileostomy closure were compared. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were evaluated and were divided into two groups: POI (+) (n = 11) and POI (-) (n = 57), and the groups were compared. There were no significant differences in the details of the index surgery, operative procedure, transanal total mesorectal excision, lateral lymph node dissection, operating time, or blood loss. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications and adjuvant chemotherapy after index surgery were significantly higher in the POI (+) group. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications and adjuvant chemotherapy after index surgery may increase the risk of postoperative ileus after ileostomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Nakao
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan.
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Kozo Yoshikawa
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Takuya Tokunaga
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Masaaki Nishi
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Hideya Kashihara
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Chie Takasu
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Yuma Wada
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Yoshimoto
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Syoko Yamashita
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| | - Yosuke Iwakawa
- Department of Digestive and Transplant Surgery, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 7708503, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Z, Fang L, Lv L, Niu Z, Hou L, Chen D, Zhou Y, Guo D. Self-administered succus entericus reinfusion before ileostomy closure improves short-term outcomes. BMC Surg 2021; 21:440. [PMID: 34961502 PMCID: PMC8713408 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01444-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aims to assess whether reinfusion of succus entericus prior to ileostomy closure can decrease postoperative length of stay and ameliorate low anterior resection score. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis based on prospectively collected data. Patients were screened from May 2016 to November 2019. A total of 30 patients who underwent reinfusion with succus entericus (SER) were enrolled in the SER group and 42 patients without SER were enrolled in the non-SER group. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative ileus between succus entericus reinfusion (SER) group and the control group. Time to first passage of flatus or stool after surgery in the SER group (27.9 ± 6.02 h) is significantly shorter than the control group (32.3 ± 6.26, hours p = 0.004). Compared with the control group (5.52 (4.0-7.0) days), postoperative length of stay in the SER group was 4.90 (3.0-7.0)days (p = 0.009). As for low anterior resection score(LARS), the SER group had a lower score 1 week after discharge than the control group (p = 0.034). However, 1 month after discharge, the LARS in the two groups had no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS Self-administered succus entericus reinfusion is a feasible prehabilitation management for outpatients and can improve better outcomes. Compared with non-reinfusion group, succus enterius reinfusion group displays significantly shorter time for gastrointestinal function recovery and postoperative hospital stay without increasing complication, and it can bring better quality of life in a short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Liu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Liang Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Liang Lv
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Zhaojian Niu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Litao Hou
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Yanbing Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Dong Guo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Rd, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ourô S, Ferreira MP, Albergaria D, Maio R. Loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: factors predicting reversal and stoma related morbidity. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:843-853. [PMID: 33851240 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02169-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Loop ileostomy is performed in rectal cancer surgery to decrease the impact of anastomotic leak but it is associated with a significant complication rate. This study aimed to analyze the morbidity related to diverting ileostomy and to identify factors predictive of complications related to stoma management and reversal, as well as conversion into a permanent ileostomy. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients submitted to oncological rectal resection and defunctioning ileostomy in a Portuguese colorectal unit between March 2012 and March 2019. RESULTS Loop ileostomy was responsible for 13% of index surgery morbidity and 15% of patients' readmissions due to high output, stoma stenosis and parastomal hernia. Ileostomy was reversed in 89% cases with 7% Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb complications. An association was established between diabetes and higher stoma management morbidity (OR: 3.28 [95% CI: 1.039-10.426]. p = 0.041). Likewise, diabetes (OR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.038; 6.90], p=0.015), oncological disease stage ≥ III (OR: 0.10 [95% CI: 0.005; 0.656], p=0.047) and index rectal surgery morbidity (OR: 0.23 [95% CI: 0.052; 0.955], p=0.041) were associated with less ileostomy closure. Complications of the index surgery also related to higher stoma reversal morbidity (OR: 5.11 [95% CI: 1.665; 16.346], p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Diabetes and complications of index rectal surgery were identified as predictive of ileostomy morbidity, closure rate and associated complications. It is essential to adjust treatment decisions to patient's morbidity risk and adopt a more selective approach concerning the use of an ileostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Ourô
- Surgical Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisbon, Portugal. .,NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | | | - Diogo Albergaria
- Surgical Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisbon, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rui Maio
- Surgical Department, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Lisbon, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|