Rectal washout and local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection

Can neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy affect exfoliated cancer cells in colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

To prevent local recurrence caused by exfoliated cancer cells caught in the suture line, intraoperative rectal washout during surgery can be performed to eliminate exfoliated cancer cells. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on exfoliated cancer cells is not well known. This study aimed to identify positive rate of malignant cells in rectal washout fluids of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy patients and to determine if neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could affect exfoliated cancer cells.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients who underwent rectal washout intraoperatively for distal sigmoid colon and rectal cancer from April 2020 to September 2021 were analyzed. The primary outcome was positive rate of malignant cells in rectal washout fluids of patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The positive rate of malignant cells in washout fluids of patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 0.0% and those who had not was 32.1%. The overall positive rate was 23.8%. In the positive group, tumor sizes were bigger (4.64 ± 1.68 cm vs. 3.64 ± 2.00 cm, p = 0.026) and more patients had a fungating tumor shown in preoperative colonoscopy (96.0% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.012). Although these factors did not show statistical significance in multivariable logistic regression analysis, fungating tumor showed a trend towards significance (OR: 7.28, 95% CI: 0.90-58.77, p = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could reduce exfoliated cancer cells, and rectal washout for the purpose of eliminating exfoliated cancer cells might be unnecessary in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Development of novel rectal/uterine clamping device

We developed a novel clamping device for laparoscopic surgery, free from conventional pinch structure, capable of uniformly occluding any ductal organ. This study aimed to evaluate performance of the new clamper compared to the pinch-type clamper. The new clamper consists of two metal bars with ties at each end, which enables parallel clamping. A resected porcine stomach was used, with an infusion tube at the anal end to increase intra-luminal pressure. The oral side of the stomach was clamped with either the new clamper or the pinch-type clamper, and their performances were evaluated in qualitative and semi-quantitative manner. Qualitative evaluation involved imaging the clamping site at intra-gastric pressures from 0 to 15 mmHg using microfocus computed tomography. The new clamper showed no gap even under increased intra-luminal pressure, while the pinch-type clamper showed a gap on the distal side. Quantitative evaluation measured bursting pressure under continuous air insufflation. Air leakages were observed in the new clamper at higher intra-luminal pressures than in the pinch-type clamper (46.1 mmHg vs. 13.6 mmHg, P < 0.01). Our new clamping device showed superior performance in preclinical setting compared to the conventional pinch-type clamper. We are currently working on its design freezing and aiming for early commercialization.

Cytological Analysis of the Surgical Field During Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

An unexpectedly large number of patients experienced local recurrence with transanal total mesorectal excision in Norway. This appears to be associated with cancer cell spillage during surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the surgical field cytology during transanal total mesorectal excision.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single center between June and December 2020.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with rectal cancer underwent transanal total mesorectal excision. After irrigation of the surgical field, the water specimens were cytologically evaluated at 6 representative steps. The first sample was used as an initial control. The second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth samples were collected after the first pursestring suture, rectotomy, the second pursestring suture, specimen resection, and anastomosis, respectively. The clinicopathological features and intraoperative complications of the patients were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was to evaluate the presence of cancer cells in washing cytological samples.

RESULTS

Of the 40 consecutive patients enrolled in this study, 18 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Incomplete first pursestring suture and rectal perforation were observed in 4 (10.0%) and 3 (7.5%) cases, respectively. In the first sample, 31 patients (77.5%) had malignant cells. Malignant findings were detected in 2 patients (5.0%) from the second to fifth samples. None of the sixth sample exhibited any malignant findings.

LIMITATIONS

This single-center study had a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer cells were initially detected by cytology, but only a few were observed throughout the procedure; however, cancer cells were not detected in the final surgical field. Further follow-up and novel studies are required to obtain clinically significant findings using cytology during transanal total mesorectal excision. See Video Abstract .

ANLISIS CITOLGICO DEL CAMPO QUIRRGICO DURANTE LA ESCISIN TOTAL DEL MESORRECTO TRANSANAL PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO UN ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO

ANTECEDENTES:Un número inesperadamente grande de pacientes experimentó recurrencia local con la escisión total del mesorrecto transanal en Noruega. Esto parece estar asociado con el derrame de células cancerosas durante la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Investigar la citología del campo quirúrgico durante la escisión total del mesorrecto transanal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte prospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un solo centro entre junio y diciembre de 2020.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes con cáncer de recto se sometieron a escisión total del mesorrecto transanal. Después de la irrigación del campo quirúrgico, las muestras de agua se evaluaron citológicamente en seis pasos representativos. La primera muestra se utilizó como control inicial. La segunda, tercera, cuarta, quinta y sexta muestras se recolectaron después de la primera sutura en bolsa de tabaco, la rectotomía, la segunda sutura en bolsa de tabaco, la resección de la muestra y la anastomosis, respectivamente. Se revisaron las características clínico-patológicas y las complicaciones intraoperatorias de los pacientes.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue evaluar la presencia de células cancerosas en el lavado de muestras citológicas.RESULTADOS:De los 40 pacientes consecutivos inscritos en este estudio, 18 pacientes se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. Se observaron la primera sutura en bolsa de tabaco incompleta y perforación rectal en cuatro (10,0%) y tres (7,5%) casos, respectivamente. En la primera muestra, 31 (77,5%) pacientes tenían células malignas. Se detectaron hallazgos malignos en dos pacientes (5,0%) de la segunda a la quinta muestra. Ninguno de la sexta muestra demostraron hallazgos malignos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio unicéntrico tuvo un tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:Inicialmente se detectaron células cancerosas mediante citología, pero solo se observaron unas pocas durante todo el procedimiento; sin embargo, no se detectaron células cancerosas en el campo quirúrgico final. Se requieren más seguimientos y estudios novedosos para obtener hallazgos clínicamente significativos mediante citología durante la escisión total del mesorrecto transanal. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Intraoperative esophageal washout reduces free intraluminal tumor cells during resection of carcinomas of the esophagus and cardia

OBJECTIVE

Intraluminally shed viable tumor cells might contribute to anastomotic recurrence in cancer of the esophagus and the cardia. The study aimed to establish a method of esophageal washout and, hence, to reduce intraluminal cancer cells before esophageal anastomosis.

METHODS

Forty-eight consecutive patients with esophago-gastric resection for histologically proven cancer of the esophagus or the cardia were included in a prospective, interventional study. Before transection, the esophagus was clamped proximally to the tumor and rinsed with 1:10 diluted povidone-iodine-solution (10 × 30 ml) applied by a transorally inserted 24F-Foley catheter. The first, fifth and tenth portion of the lavage fluid were sent to cytological examination.

RESULTS

Intraoperative frozen sections confirmed clear proximal resection margins of the esophagus. The cytological examination of the fluid recovered from the esophageal washout revealed malignant cells in 13/48 patients (27%). The presence of malignant cells was significantly less likely in patients with neoadjuvant treatment than in patients without neoadjuvant treatment: 2/23 (9%) vs. 11/25 (44%) (p = 0.009). Repetitive washout reduced the probability of detectable malignant cells from 13 to 8 (62%) patients after 5, and further to 4 patients (30%) after 10 washout maneuvers.

CONCLUSIONS

Free malignant cells may be present in the esophageal lumen following intraoperative manipulation of cancers of the esophagus or cardia. Transoral washout of the esophagus is novel, feasible and enables reduction or even elimination of these tumor cells. The reliability of this procedure raises with increasing washout volume. Esophageal washout might be especially worthwhile in patients who do not receive neoadjuvant therapy.

Effect of lateral lymph nodes without malignant characteristics on the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer

Background: Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for rectal cancer patients. However, the effect of LLNs without malignant characteristics on the prognosis of rectal cancer patients has been uncertain. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection were included. Patients with MRI-detected LLNs, but without malignant characteristics, were compared with patients with no MRI-detected LLNs. Results: The local recurrence rate was higher in the LLN-present group than in the LLN-absent group (9.8% vs 2.5%; p = 0.056). The overall survival of patients with no MRI-detected LLNs was significantly better than that of patients with MRI-detected LLNs (p = 0.021). Conclusion: The presence of LLNs, even without malignant features, may lead to worse local control and overall survival.

Rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer has no impact on the oncological outcome

AIM

Intraoperative rectal washout is performed to eliminate exfoliated intraluminal cancer cells and thereby decrease the risk of local recurrence. Rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection has not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcome after rectal washout in abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer and to find evidence as to whether rectal washout should be performed or not.

METHOD

Data for all patients registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who underwent elective surgery with abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer (TNM Stages I-III) between 2007 and 2013 were analysed using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were shown between the rectal washout group and the no rectal washout group for local recurrence [10/265 (3.8%) vs. 87/2160 (4.0%), p = 0.84], distant metastasis [51/265 (19.2%) vs. 476/2160 (22.0%), p = 0.29] or overall recurrence [53/265 (20.0%) vs. 505/2160 (23.4%), p = 0.21]. In multivariable analysis, rectal washout did not significantly affect the oncological outcome in terms of local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall recurrence or 5-year overall or relative survival.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support routine rectal washout during abdominoperineal resection in order to improve the oncological outcome.

Local recurrence at the site of the Lone Star device through implantation of exfoliated cells during local excision for early rectal cancer: A case report

Introduction

Invasive procedures for colorectal cancer can cause iatrogenic tumor cell seeding. Implantation of these exfoliated cells in the surrounding tissue can result in locoregional cancer recurrence. This has been described in endoscopic procedures and major surgical resections, however recurrence in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal during minimal invasive rectal surgery has not been shown in literature yet. This is the first reported case of recurrent rectal cancer that developed into an anal metastasis at the site where hooks of the Lone Star Retractor disrupted the epithelial lining of the anal canal during a local excision of early rectal cancer using TAMIS.

Presentation of case

A 57 year old male was diagnosed with a high risk early stage rectal adenocarcinoma. He was treated with transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with the use of a Lone Star retractor and he received subsequent chemo-radiotherapy. 23 months later the patient developed a bleeding mass bulging out of the anus. A true cut and incision biopsy was performed and the pathology report revealed localization of adenocarcinoma at the anal canal which was similar to the earlier diagnosed rectal carcinoma. The patient underwent an abdominal perineal resection and left-sided lymph node dissection.

Discussion and conclusion

This shows that local recurrence through implantation of exfoliated tumor cells can occur in iatrogenic lesions of the anal canal not only in major but also in minimal invasive rectal surgery. Careful tissue handling and rectal washout may reduce the chance of this implantation metastasis.

•

Recurrent rectal cancer can occur at the site of an iatrogenic anal lesion.

•

Anal metastasis can develop due to implantation of exfoliated rectal tumor cells.

•

Iatrogenic local recurrence occurs in both major rectal surgery and local excision.

•

Careful tissue handling and rectal washout may reduce the chance of recurrence.

In vitro analysis of exfoliated tumor cells in intraluminal lavage samples after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

PURPOSE

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) produces exfoliated tumor cells that occasionally cause local recurrence. However, the biological characteristics of these tumor cells have not been clarified. The aim of this study was to clarify the genetic background and viability of exfoliated tumor cells in colorectal ESDs, as well as possible method for their elimination.

METHODS

Post-ESD intraluminal lavage samples from 19 patients who underwent colorectal ESDs were collected. In four patients with adenocarcinoma, gene mutations in the primary tumors and exfoliated cells in lavage samples were analyzed using a next-generation sequencer (NGS). In 15 patients with adenoma or adenocarcinoma, the viability of exfoliated cells and the cell-killing effect of povidone-iodine on exfoliated cells were evaluated.

RESULTS

The analysis using a NGS demonstrated that tumors targeted for ESD had already acquired mutations in many genes involved in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasions. Furthermore, gene mutations between the exfoliated tumor cells and tumors resected by ESDs showed a 92 to 100% concordance. The median viable cell counts and the median viability of exfoliated cells in intraluminal lavage samples after ESDs were 4.9 × 10⁵ cells/mL and 24%, respectively. The viability of the exfoliated cells did not decrease even 12 h after ESD. However, contact with 2.0% povidone-iodine solution reduced both viable cell counts and viability, significantly.

CONCLUSION

A large number of tumor cells exfoliated during colorectal ESDs had acquired survival-favorable gene mutations and could survive for some time. Therefore, a lavage using a solution of 2.0% povidone-iodine may be effective against such cells.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The prospective study registered 1317, and the retrospective study registered 2729. The prospective study approved on June 20, 2016, and the retrospective study approved on October 6, 2020.

Rectal washout does not increase the complication risk after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Background

To reduce local recurrence risk, rectal washout (RW) is integrated in the total mesorectal excision (TME) technique when performing anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer. Although RW is considered a safe practice, data on the complication risk are scarce. Our aim was to examine the association between RW and 30-day postoperative complications after AR for rectal cancer.

Methods

Patients from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry who underwent AR between 2007 and 2013 were analysed using multivariable methods.

Results

A total of 4821 patients were included (4317 RW, 504 no RW). The RW group had lower rates of overall complications (1578/4317 (37%) vs. 208/504 (41%), p = 0.039), surgical complications (879/4317 (20%) vs. 140/504 (28%), p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (50/4317 (1.2%) vs. 12/504 (2.4%), p = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, RW was a risk factor neither for overall complications (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.90, p = 0.002) nor for surgical complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

RW is a safe technique that does not increase the 30-day postoperative complication risk after AR with TME technique for rectal cancer.

Effect of rectal washout on local recurrence of rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Presence of intraluminal viable cancer cells implanting into the anastomosis has been proposed as a potential cause for developing local recurrence in patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer. Rectal washout has been proposed as a method to prevent this from happening. There have been conflicting reports in literature regarding the effect of rectal washout on local recurrence. We aim to look at the role of rectal washout in preventing local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients undergoing total or tumor-specific mesorectal excision (TME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review of studies evaluating the role of rectal washout on rectal cancer local recurrence was performed using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and non-English language literature search using CiNii (Japanese) and CNKI (Chinese). Inclusion criteria were use of TME, comparison of rectal washout with no washout, and evaluation of local recurrence as outcome.

RESULTS

Four studies were identified according to inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a protective effect of rectal washout on local recurrence (OR 0.45 95% CI 0.45-0.75). However, one of the studies included had more than 90% weightage. Excluding this study from analysis showed no difference on local recurrence with rectal washout (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.37-2.36).

CONCLUSION

The effect of rectal washout on rectal cancer local recurrence in patients who undergo TME is questionable and needs to be evaluated further by prospective studies.

Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer with side-to-end anastomosis in a patient with anal stenosis

Background

Colorectal anastomosis using the double stapling technique (DST) has become a standard procedure. However, DST is difficult to perform in patients with anal stenosis because a circular stapler cannot be inserted into the rectum through the anus. Thus, an alternative procedure is required for colorectal anastomosis.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old woman presented with bloody stool. Colonoscopy and computed tomography revealed advanced low rectal cancer without lymph node or distant metastasis. We initially planned to perform low anterior resection using a double stapling technique or transanal hand-sewn anastomosis, but this would have been too difficult due to anal stenosis and fibrosis caused by a Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy performed 20 years earlier. The patient had never experienced defecation problems and declined a stoma. Therefore, we inserted an anvil into the rectal stump and fixed it robotically with a purse-string suture followed by insertion of the shaft of the circular stapler from the sigmoidal side. In this way, side-to-end anastomosis was accomplished laparoscopically. The distance from the anus to the anastomosis was 5 cm. The patient was discharged with no anastomotic leakage. Robotic assistance proved extremely useful for low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis.

Conclusion

Performing side-to-end anastomosis with robotic assistance was extremely useful in this patient with rectal cancer and anal stenosis.

Is Intraluminal Washout Necessary for Patients with Sigmoid Colon Cancer to Eliminate Exfoliated Cancer Cells as in Patients with Rectal Cancer? A Pilot Study at a Single Institute

Objectives:

Rectal stump washout has been widely performed to prevent the implantation of exfoliated cancer cells (ECCs) in patients with rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear whether intraluminal washout before transection is required in patients with sigmoid colon cancer. Therefore, this pilot study was conducted to elucidate the necessity of intraluminal washout for sigmoid colon cancer patients in comparison with rectal cancer patients by cytological assessments.

Methods:

A total of 16 patients with sigmoid colon cancer and 24 patients with rectal cancer who underwent sigmoidectomy or anterior resection with anastomosis using double-stapling technique were enrolled. A transanal washout sample was collected before washout and after irrigation with 500 and 1,000 mL of saline. Cytological assessments were conducted according to the Papanicolaou classification, and class IV and V cells were defined as malignant.

Results:

Before washout, exfoliated cancer cells were found in 15 of 24 (62.5%) patients with rectal cancer and in 1 of 16 (6.2%) patients with sigmoid colon cancer (p < 0.001). Distal-free margin from the tumor was significantly shorter in patients with cancer cells (p = 0.002), and the length of the distal-free margin was significantly associated with the tumor location. After irrigation with 500 and 1,000 mL of saline, no cancer cell was found in all patients with sigmoid colon cancer, whereas ECCs were still found in five patients with rectal cancer (20.8%).

Conclusions:

Intraluminal washout with 1,000 mL may be sufficient for sigmoid colon cancer patients with longer distal-free margin. A large-scale, randomized controlled study is necessary to confirm these results.

Exfoliated cancer cells during intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the frequency of exfoliated cancer cells and the efficacy of rectal washout during intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients not receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for very low rectal cancer.

METHOD

The subjects of this prospective study were 16 consecutive patients who underwent ISR without CRT for very low rectal cancer. Brushing cytology of the posterior anorectal wall was performed twice in each step of the ISR procedure and the samples were sent for blind cytological examination to identify exfoliated cancer cells.

RESULTS

Exfoliated cancer cells were identified in 9 of 13 patients (69%) preoperatively. The number of cancer cells identified after abdominal total mesorectal dissection decreased significantly from 94% (15/16) to 25% (4/16) after transanal irrigation with 2000 mL saline (p < 0.001). No cancer cells were identified after swabbing the anal wall following transanal dissection with purse-string closure of the distal stump. No suture-line recurrence was found during a median follow-up duration of 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Exfoliated cancer cells, confirmed in 94% of patients after total mesorectal excision, could be eliminated by performing rectal irrigation after clamping the rectum proximal to the tumor and swabbing the anorectal wall during ISR.

The effect of rectal washout on local recurrence following rectal cancer surgery

Introduction Local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and debilitating symptoms. Intraoperative rectal washout has been linked to a reduction in local recurrence but there is no conclusive evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing rectal washout had any effect on the incidence of local recurrence in patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer in the context of the current surgical management. Methods A total of 395 consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection with or without rectal washout for rectal cancer between January 2003 and July 2009 at a high volume single institution were analysed retrospectively. A standardised process for performing washout was used and all patients had standardised surgery in the form of total mesorectal excision. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy was used on a selected basis. Patients were followed up for five years and local recurrence rates were compared in the two groups. Results Of the 395 patients, 297 had rectal washout and 98 did not. Both groups were well matched with regard to various important clinical, operative and histopathological characteristics. Overall, the local recurrence rate was 5.3%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of local recurrence between the washout group (5.7%) and the no washout group (4.1%). Conclusions Among our cohort of patients, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of local recurrence after anterior resection with or without rectal washout. This suggests that other factors are more significant in the development of local recurrence.

The importance of rectal washout for the oncological outcome after Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: analysis of population-based data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

During rectal cancer surgery the bowel may contain viable, exfoliated cancer cells, a potential source for local recurrence (LR). The amount and viability of these cells can be reduced using intraoperative rectal washout, a procedure that reduces the LR risk after anterior resection. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of washout on oncological outcome when performed in Hartmann's procedure (HP) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A national cohort study on data for patients registered from 1995 to 2007 in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry was carried out. The final analysis included patients belonging to TNM stages I-III who had undergone R0 HP with a registered 5-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1188 patients were analysed (686 washout and 502 no washout). No differences were detected between the washout group and the no washout group concerning rates of LR [7% (49/686) vs. 10% (49/502); p = 0.13], distant metastasis (DM) [17% (119/686) vs. 18% (93/502); p = 0.65], and overall recurrence (OAR) [21% (145/686) vs. 24% (120/502); p = 0.29]. For both groups, the 5-year cancer-specific survival was below 50%. In multivariate analysis, washout neither decreased the risk of LR, DM, or OAR nor increased overall or the cancer-specific 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The oncological outcome did not improve when washout was performed in HP for rectal cancer.

Benefit of rectal washout for anterior resection and left sided resections

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of rectal wash out in preventing local recurrence for patients who undergo anterior resection for recto-sigmoid cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. Medline 1948-2015 and EMBASE 1980 to 2015 using the OVID interface: ( Rectal) AND (Washout) AND (Anterior Resection). In addition, the reference lists of the relevant papers were searched.

OUTCOMES

Eight papers among the 17 relevant articles were identified as representing the best evidence including 3 prospective non-randomized studies, 1 retrospective non randomized study and 4 meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of current evidence, rectal washout does not stop local recurrence of cancer after anterior resection or left sided colonic resection, but it may reduce the rate of local recurrence. A randomised controlled trial to address this issue would formally answer this question.

Reasonable application of rectal washout in surgery for rectal cancer: Influence on prognosis and recurrence

The growth of residual tumor cells may cause postoperative colorectal anastomotic recurrence, which mainly exists in the intestine; however, rectal washout can significantly reduce the number of free tumor cells in the intestinal cavity and decrease the local recurrence rate. Clinical application of rectal washout has been tried in operation, but the effect remains controversial. This paper mainly introduces the method of rectal washout, washout fluid type, amount of washout fluid, relation of rectal washout with local recurrence, with emphasis on the influence of reasonable application of rectal washout on prognosis and recurrence of rectal cancer after surgery.

Intra-operative rectal washout with saline solution can effectively prevent anastomotic recurrence: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rectal washout with saline solution may theoretically prevent anastomotic recurrence in patients with resectable rectal cancer, although exact clinical effects have not yet been determined. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, the present meta-analysis was performed.

METHOD

Relevant studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase and Google Website with no restrictions to September 1, 2013, and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

5 trials (642 participants) were included to assess the association between rectal washout with saline solution and anastomotic recurrence. The rate of anastomotic recurrence (AR) was 6.23% (40/642), with the pooled OR derived from the five studies being 0.32 (95 % CI=0.15-0.70, P=0.004). The pooled OR derived from the TME and radical resection subgroups were 0.72 (95%CI=0.16-3.12, P=0.66) and 0.51 (95%CI=0.13-1.96, P=0.32), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results from this analysis show that intra-operative rectal washout with mere saline solution largely reduces the risk of anastomotic recurrences in patients with resectable rectal cancer.

Impact of mechanical bowel preparation on survival after colonic cancer resection

BACKGROUND

A randomized study in 1999-2005 of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) preceding colonic resection found no decrease in postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effect of MBP regarding cancer recurrence and survival after colonic resections.

METHODS

The cohort of patients with colonic cancer in the MBP study was followed up for 10 years. Data were collected from registers run by the National Board of Health and Welfare. Register data were validated against information in patient charts. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis of factors predictive of cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Register analysis showed significantly fewer recurrences, and better cancer-specific and overall survival in the MBP group. After validation, 839 of 1343 patients remained for analysis (448 MBP, 391 no MBP). Eighty (17·9 per cent) of 448 patients in the MBP group and 88 (22·5 per cent) of 391 in the no-MBP group developed a cancer recurrence (P = 0·093). The 10-year cancer-specific survival rate was 84·1 per cent in the MBP group and 78·0 per cent in the no-MBP group (P = 0·019). Overall survival rates were 58·8 and 56·0 per cent respectively (P = 0·186).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving MBP before elective colonic cancer surgery had significantly better cancer-specific survival after 10 years.

Association between irrigation fluids, washout volumes and risk of local recurrence of anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 427 cases and 492 controls

BACKGROUND

Rectal washout can prevent local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Few studies have focused particularly on the association between irrigation fluids volume or agents and the risk of local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between irrigation fluids types, volumes of rectal washout and risk of local recurrence after anterior resection for cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, Wiley Online Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Register, Wanfang databases and Google Website from their inception until October 18,2013.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the association between rectal washout types and volumes and risk of local recurrence after anterior resection for cancer were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible studies used rectal washout. Control groups were defined as no washout.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Random-effects model were used to obtain summary estimates of RR and 95% CI, with Stata version 11 and RevMan 5.2.5 softwares used. The quality of report was appraised in reference to the MINORS item.

RESULTS

Of the 919 rectal cancer patients in 8 included studies, a total of 61(6.64%) cases of local recurrence were reported, with a pooled RR 0.51 (95%CI = 0.28-0.92, P = 0.03). The RRs 0.37 and 0.39 in normal saline and washout volume (≥ 1500 ml normal saline) subgroup, respectively, indicated that rectal washout with normal saline, or ≥ 1500 ml in volume could significantly reduce local recurrence (LR) rate (95% CI = 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.18-0.87, P = 0.02) after anterior resection for cancer.

LIMITATION

The included studies were non-randomized observational studies, with diversity of study designs.

CONCLUSION

Rectal washout with normal saline alone can reduce the risk of local recurrence in patients with resectable rectal cancer, and 1.5 liters rectal washout in volume is recommended.

Association between irrigation fluids, washout volumes and risk of local recurrence of anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 427 cases and 492 controls

BACKGROUND

Rectal washout can prevent local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Few studies have focused particularly on the association between irrigation fluids volume or agents and the risk of local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between irrigation fluids types, volumes of rectal washout and risk of local recurrence after anterior resection for cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, Wiley Online Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Register, Wanfang databases and Google Website from their inception until October 18,2013.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting the association between rectal washout types and volumes and risk of local recurrence after anterior resection for cancer were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible studies used rectal washout. Control groups were defined as no washout.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Random-effects model were used to obtain summary estimates of RR and 95% CI, with Stata version 11 and RevMan 5.2.5 softwares used. The quality of report was appraised in reference to the MINORS item.

RESULTS

Of the 919 rectal cancer patients in 8 included studies, a total of 61(6.64%) cases of local recurrence were reported, with a pooled RR 0.51 (95%CI = 0.28-0.92, P = 0.03). The RRs 0.37 and 0.39 in normal saline and washout volume (≥ 1500 ml normal saline) subgroup, respectively, indicated that rectal washout with normal saline, or ≥ 1500 ml in volume could significantly reduce local recurrence (LR) rate (95% CI = 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01; 95% CI = 0.18-0.87, P = 0.02) after anterior resection for cancer.

LIMITATION

The included studies were non-randomized observational studies, with diversity of study designs.

CONCLUSION

Rectal washout with normal saline alone can reduce the risk of local recurrence in patients with resectable rectal cancer, and 1.5 liters rectal washout in volume is recommended.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of rectal washout on risk of local recurrence for cancer

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that intraluminal washout (WO) can prevent local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the association of rectal WO and the risk of LR after anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

The relevant studies were identified by a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Wiley Online Library, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Register with no restrictions on October 18, 2013, and these studies were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in fixed effects model.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were included in our study, yielding a total of 5519 patients, and pooled ORs for overall LR in corresponding subgroups were calculated. Rectal WO was associated with a lower risk for LR (240/4176, 5.75% versus 9.75%, 131/1343, OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42-0.68, and P < 0.00001) in patients with anterior resection, having total mesorectal excisions (234/3942, 5.93% versus 9.34%, 97/1039, OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.75, and P < 0.00001), and after radical resection (RR; 122/2665, 4.99% versus 8.90%, 74/831, OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41-0.78, and P = 0.0005), with an overall LR rate of 6.72% (371/5519). But, the stability of RRs is not high in the total mesorectal excisions or RR subgroup by sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rectal WO decreases risks of LR in patients after anterior resection of cancer.

Validity of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry for patients treated with major abdominal surgery between 1995 and 1997

BACKGROUND

Founded in 1995, the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR) is frequently used for rectal cancer research. However, the validity of the registry has not been extensively studied. This study aims to validate a large amount of registry data to assess SRCR quality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study comprises 906 patients treated with major abdominal surgery registered in the SRCR between 1995 and 1997. SRCR data for 14 variables were scrutinized for validity against the medical records. Kappa's and Kendall's correlation coefficients for agreement between SRCR data and medical records data were calculated for 13 variables.

RESULTS

For 11 variables, concerning the tumor, neoadjuvant therapy, the surgical procedure, local radicality and TNM stage, data were missing in 5% or less of the registrations; for the remaining three variables, anastomotic leakage, local and distant recurrence, data were missing in 13-38%. For the variables surgery performed or not and type of surgical procedure, no data were missing. Erroneous registrations were found in less than 10% of all variables; for the variables preoperative chemotherapy and surgery performed or not, all registrations were correct. For the variables concerning neoadjuvant therapy, local radicality according to the surgeon as well as the pathologist and distant metastasis, the false-positive or -negative registrations were equally distributed, and for the variables rectal washout, rectal perforation, anastomotic leakage and local recurrence there was a discrepancy in distribution. The correlation coefficient for 12 variables ranged from 0.82 to 1.00, and was 0.78 for the remaining variable.

CONCLUSION

The validity of the SRCR was good for the initial three registry years. Thus, research based on SRCR data is reliable from the beginning of the registry's use.

Risk factors for local recurrence following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancers

Local recurrence (LR) has an adverse impact on rectal cancer treatment. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is increasingly administered to patients with progressive cancers to improve the prognosis. However, LR still remains a problem and its pattern can alter. Correspondingly, new risk factors have emerged in the context of nCRT in addition to the traditional risk factors in patients receiving non-neoadjuvant therapies. These risk factors are decisive when reviewing treatment options. This review aims to elucidate the distinctive risk factors related to LR of rectal cancers in patients receiving nCRT and to clarify their clinical significance. A search was conducted on PubMed to identify original studies investigating patients with rectal cancer receiving nCRT. Outcomes of interest, especially potential risk factors for LR in patients with nCRT, were then analyzed. The clinical importance of these risk factors is discussed. Remnant cancer cells, lymph-nodes and tumor response were found to be major risk factors. Remnant cancer cells decide the status of resection margins. Local excision following nCRT is promising in ypT0-1N0M0 cases. Dissection of lateral lymph nodes should be considered in advanced low-lying cancers. Although better tumor response resulted in a relatively lower recurrence rate, the evidence available is insufficient to justify a non-operative approach in clinical complete responders to nCRT. LR cannot be totally avoided by current multidisciplinary approaches. The related risk factors resulting from nCRT should be considered when making decisions regarding treatment selection.

Intraoperative rectal washout in rectal cancer surgery: a survey of current practice in the UK

OBJECTIVES

Due to concerns about implantation of malignant cells during surgery for rectal cancer, traditionally, intraoperative rectal washout (IORW) has been performed to prevent local recurrence. But with the advent of laparoscopic surgery, many surgeons have abandoned this practice. The aim of this study was to assess current practice among colorectal surgeons in the UK.

METHODS

A 10-item questionnaire was sent by email to 452 consultant surgeons, who were members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland, and had previously agreed to participate in research projects.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 149 responders (n = 149, 33.0%) was 49.2 years. The mean number of years in independent practice was 12.1, and the mean number of rectal cancer cases performed per year was 20.3 and 20.6, in the years 2010 and 2011 respectively. 74.3% of the responders believed that there is an advantage in performing IORWs in rectal cancer resections. Of the 71.8% of all responders who performed laparoscopic rectal cancer resections, 54.8% routinely performed IORWs during laparoscopic resections. However, 87.2% of all responders performed IORWs in open resections for rectal cancer, and 79.2% had routinely performed IORWs before the advent of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most colorectal surgeons believe that there is an advantage in performing IORWs. Although, most surgeons would routinely perform IORWs in open resections, they do not routinely perform these in laparoscopic resections.

Evaluation of the presence of intraluminal cancer cells following rectal washout in rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

The presence of intraluminal tumour cells in colorectal cancer is known, as is their ability to implant in colorectal anastomoses, causing perianastomotic tumour growth. There is no consensus as to the volume and agent to use for rectal washout. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of our current routine for rectal washout in eliminating intraluminal tumour cells.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing low anterior resection or low Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer at our unit were included. After the pelvic dissection was completed, the bowel was cross-clamped distal to the tumour and the prewashout sample (no. 1), was obtained by instilling 50 ml of saline and collecting the return fluid. A rectal washout followed using 500 ml of sterile water, 2 × 500 ml of 70 % ethanol and 500 ml of sterile water (sample no. 2-4) and the postwashout sample (no. 5) was obtained by using 50 ml of saline. The samples were examined and categorized as non-malignant or malignant at the Department of Pathology. The usual pathology report information was also assessed.

RESULTS

In 33 of the 60 patients, cancer cells were identified in the prewashout sample. The rectal washout eliminated intraluminal cancer cells in 30 of the 33 patients. All of the remaining 3 had a higher blood loss (p = 0.026) and a tendency towards more polypoidal tumours (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

A rectal washout volume larger than 2,000 ml might be necessary to eliminate all intraluminal tumour cells in total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Population-based data from the Swedish Colon Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the external validity of clinical trials requires knowledge not only of the study population but also of a relevant reference population. The main aim of this study was to present data from a large, contemporary, population-based cohort of patients with colonic cancer.

METHODS

Data on patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 were extracted from the Swedish Colon Cancer Registry. The data, registered prospectively in a national population of almost 10 million, included over 99 per cent of all diagnosed adenocarcinomas of the colon.

RESULTS

This analysis included 18,889 patients with 19,526 tumours (3·0 per cent had synchronous tumours). The sex distribution was fairly equal, and the median age was 74·1 (interquartile range 65-81) years. The overall and relative (cancer-specific) survival rates after 3 years were 62·7 and 71·4 per cent respectively. Some 88·0 per cent of the patients were operated on, and 83·8 per cent had tumours resected. Median blood loss during bowel resection was 200 (mean 311) ml, and the median operating time was 160 min; 5·6 per cent of the procedures were laparoscopic. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 2·1 per cent of patients; postoperative chemotherapy was planned in 90·1 per cent of fit patients aged less than 75 years with stage III disease. In patients operated on in an emergency setting (21·5 per cent), the preoperative evaluation was less extensive, the proportion of R0 resections was lower, and the outcomes were poorer, in both the short and long term.

CONCLUSION

These population-based data represent good-quality reference points.

The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantation of exfoliated cancer cells has been suggested as a possible mechanism of local recurrence at the site of colorectal anastomosis. Intraoperative rectal washout has been suggested to eliminate free cancer cells; however, there is no conclusive evidence of a beneficial effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Studies published through February 2012 evaluating the impact of intraoperative rectal washout for local recurrence or positive cytology from donuts wash were identified by an electronic literature search. A meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models to compute risk ratio (RR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 5,395 patients. Eight studies evaluated overall local recurrence, including anastomotic recurrence, and five of the eight studies evaluated anastomotic recurrence separately. Two studies evaluated positive cytology from donuts wash. Local recurrence rate was 5.79% in the washout group and 10.05% in the no washout group-a difference that was statistically significant (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.46-0.71; P < 0.00001). Rectal washout significantly reduced the risk of anastomotic recurrence (RR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.12-0.71; P = 0.007). No influence of rectal washout was observed on positive cytology from donuts wash.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results of this meta-analysis, it may be justified to recommend intraoperative rectal washout to prevent local recurrence in rectal cancer surgery.

Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis

AIM

The effectiveness of rectal washout was compared with no washout for the prevention of local recurrence after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, OVID Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Five nonrandomized studies including a total of 5012 patients were identified. Meta-analysis suggested that rectal washout significantly reduced the local recurrence rate (P < 0.0001; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43-0.74). It was also significantly lower after washout in patients having radical resection only (P = 0.0004; OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.76), patients treated by a curative resection (P < 0.0001; OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72) and those undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.04; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the design of the included studies the meta-analysis showed that rectal washout is associated with reduced local recurrence and therefore should be routine during anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Rectal transection using a curved cutter stapler with an endo-Satinsky clamp during a laparoscopic low anterior resection

PURPOSE

A new rectal transaction method was developed using a combination of the curved cutter stapler and endo-Satinsky clamp because of the difficulty in performing rectal transection in the narrow pelvic cavity.

METHODS

The endo-Satinsky clamp is inserted without a flexible trocar cannula by connecting the handle extra-abdominally with a shaft of the endo-Satinsky clamp through the left higher quadrant port via a retrograde course from a midline incision above the pubis symphysis. The endo-Satinsky clamp is used to clamp the rectal wall horizontally at the distal end of the tumor. The wrist of an elastic surgical glove fixed with the shaft of the curved cutter stapler is covered with a midline incision, and consequently, the stapler is inserted into the pelvic cavity. The curved head of the stapler is rotated to the left at the anal side of the endo-Satinsky clamp to insert the rectum between the jaws of the stapler. The stapler is closed and fired, and a rectal transection is thus performed with one firing using a single cartridge.

RESULTS

This method was performed in 12 patients with rectal cancer. The median value and range of the tumor distance from the anal verge were 7.0 and 4.5-11.0 cm, respectively. The median duration of the operation was 252 min, and the median blood loss was 15 mL. Only one stapling cartridge was used for rectal transection in all cases, and no major complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We herein demonstrated a new transection method for rectal cancer.

Genomic CGH-assessed structural DNA alterations in rectal carcinoma as related to local recurrence following primary operation for cure

Several factors determine overall outcome and possible local recurrence after curative surgery for rectal carcinoma. Surgical performance is usually believed to be the most pertinent factor, followed by adjuvant oncological treatment and tumor histopathology. However, chromosomal instability is common in colorectal cancer and tumor clones are assumed to differ in aggressiveness and potential of causing local recurrence. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate if genetic alterations in primary rectal carcinoma are predictive of local recurrences. A large clinical database with linked bio-bank allowed for careful matching of two patient groups (R0) resected for rectal carcinoma. One group had developed early, isolated local recurrences and the other group seemed cured after 93 months follow-up. DNA from the primary tumors was analysed with array-CGH (comparative genomic hybridization) including 55,000 genomic probes. DNA from all primary tumors in both groups displayed previously reported and well-recognised DNA aberrations in colorectal carcinoma. Significant copy number gains were confirmed in the 4q31.1-31.22 region in DNA from tumors with subsequent local recurrence. Twenty-two affected genes in this region code for products with high relevance in tumor biology (p53 regulation, cell cycle activity, transcription). DNA from rectal carcinoma displayed well-known aberrations as described for colon carcinoma with no obvious prediction of local rectal recurrence. Gains in the 4q31.1-31.22 DNA region are highly potential for local recurrence despite R0 resection to be confirmed in larger patient materials.