Rural and urban distribution of trauma incidents in Scotland

Opportunities to prevent fatalities due to injury: a cross-sectional comparison of prehospital and in-hospital fatal injury deaths in New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

There is interest in opportunities that lie in the prehospital setting to reduce the substantial burden of fatal injury. This study examines the epidemiology of prehospital and in-hospital fatal injury in New Zealand.

METHODS

All deaths registered in 2008-2012 with an underlying cause of death external cause-code V01-Y36 (ICD-10-AM) were identified. The setting of death was determined following linkage to, and review of, hospital discharge data and Coronial records.

RESULTS

Of 7,522 injury deaths, 80% occurred in a prehospital setting, with the highest burden relating to males. Within those fatally injured, 25-54-year-olds had a higher risk of prehospital death than 55-84-year-olds (adjusted Relative Risk [aRR] 1.20, 95%CI 1.16, 1.20). Similarly, those injured due to drowning (aRR 1.39, CI 1.26, 1.53) and non-hanging suffocation (aRR 1.31, CI 1.18, 1.45) had a higher risk of prehospital death than those 'struck by/machinery'.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital deaths account for four out of five fatal injuries in New Zealand. Of the fatally injured population, the probability of prehospital death differed by age, sex, injury mechanism and intent. Implications for public health: This study highlights the importance of strengthening prevention efforts to reduce the substantive burden of prehospital fatalities in New Zealand.

Optimizing the Availability of Enhanced Prehospital Care Team Resources

OBJECTIVE

After recent developments within the North West Air Ambulance (NWAA), we undertook a service evaluation to determine if resource use could be improved. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) At what time of day do major trauma incidents occur in the North West of England? 2) Do current NWAA operating hours meet the needs of these major trauma patients? 3) Where do major trauma incidents occur in the North West of England? and 4) Are current NWAA resources optimally located to meet the needs of these major trauma patients?

METHODS

We reviewed records from the Trauma Audit and Research Network database for the North West of England (the counties of Cheshire, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, Cumbria, and Lancashire) between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. These data were supplemented by incident records from the North West Ambulance Service National Health Service Trust. Analysis was undertaken using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and MapInfo Pro (Pitney Bowes, Stamford, CT). A survey will be conducted to give insight into the level of cover provided by other UK helicopter emergency medical services.

RESULTS

Data from 2,318 incidents were analyzed. Major trauma occurs in higher numbers at certain times of day, varies from weekday to weekend, and takes place in higher concentrations in certain locations, appearing related to population density.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant difference between the current trauma care provision and the demand of major trauma incidents. The findings of this study suggest an expansion in cover provided by the NWAA may be appropriate.

Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines

Complex pelvic injuries are among the most dangerous and deadly trauma related lesions. Different classification systems exist, some are based on the mechanism of injury, some on anatomic patterns and some are focusing on the resulting instability requiring operative fixation. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic impairment of pelvic ring function and the associated injuries. The management of pelvic trauma patients aims definitively to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology associated to the mechanical stability of the pelvic ring. Thus the management of pelvic trauma must be multidisciplinary and should be ultimately based on the physiology of the patient and the anatomy of the injury. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of pelvic trauma and the management Guidelines.

Association between trauma and socioeconomic deprivation: a registry-based, Scotland-wide retrospective cohort study of 9,238 patients

Background

Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the UK and throughout the world. Socioeconomic deprivation has been linked with many types of ill-health and previous studies have shown an association with injury in other parts of the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between socioeconomic deprivation and trauma incidence and case-fatality in Scotland.

Methods

The study included nine thousand two hundred and thirty eight patients attending Emergency Departments following trauma across Scotland in 2011-12. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using secondary data extracted from the national trauma registry. Postcode of residence was used to generate deciles using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated to allow comparison of incidence of trauma across SIMD deciles. For mortality, observed: expected ratios were obtained using observed mortality in the cohort and expected deaths using probability of survival based on Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method.

Results

Compared with the most deprived decile, the least deprived had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) for all trauma of 0.43 (95 % CI 0.32–0.58, p < 0.001). The association was stronger for penetrating trauma (IRR 0.07, 95 % CI .01–0.56, p = 0.011). There was a significant interaction between age, gender and SIMD. For case fatality, multivariate logistic regression showed that, severity of trauma (ISS > 15) OR 18.11 (95 % CI 13.91 to 23.58) and type of injury (Penetrating versus blunt injury) OR 2.07 (95 % CI 1.15 to 3.72) remain as independent predictors of case fatality in this dataset.

Discussion

Our data shows a higher incidence of trauma amongst a socioeconomically deprived population, in keeping with other areas of the world. In our dataset, outcome, as measured by in-hospital mortality, does not appear to be associated with socioeconomic deprivation.

Conclusion

In Scotland, populations living in socioeconomically deprived areas have a higher incidence of trauma, especially penetrating trauma, requiring hospital attendance. Case fatality is associated with more severe trauma and penetrating trauma, but not socioeconomic deprivation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0275-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Access to specialist care: Optimizing the geographic configuration of trauma systems

The optimal geographic configuration of health care systems is key to maximizing accessibility while promoting the efficient use of resources. This article reports the use of a novel approach to inform the optimal configuration of a national trauma system.

Restructuring an evolving Irish trauma system: What can we learn from Europe and Australia?

AIM

Major trauma is a leading cause of mortality and disability. Internationally, major trauma centres and comprehensive trauma networks are associated with improved outcomes. This study aimed to examine selected international trauma systems in Europe and Australia to identify common themes that may aid reconfiguration of the Irish trauma service.

METHODS

An electronic search strategy was utilised using Medline, and a search of the grey literature using Google and Google Scholar. Search terms included "trauma systems", "trauma care", "major trauma centre" and "trauma network". Relevant articles were reviewed and data summarised in a narrative format.

RESULTS

Republic of Ireland currently lacks designated major trauma centres and surrounding trauma networks. Lessons from international models and data from the on-going national trauma audit may guide reconfiguration. Well-functioning trauma systems internationally bear striking similarities, and involve a hub and spoke model. This model has a central major trauma centre, surrounded by a co-ordinated trauma network with trauma units. Concentration of major trauma into high volume centres is key, but these centres must be adequately resourced to deliver a high quality service. Investment in and co-ordination of prehospital care is essential to overcome geographical impediments to centralising trauma care. Funding of rehabilitation infrastructure and resources is also an integral part of a well-functioning trauma system. Trauma outcome data is key to informing trauma system design, with dissemination of this data and public engagement critical for change.

CONCLUSION

International models of trauma care provide valuable lessons for countries currently in process of reconfiguring trauma services.

Association between volume of severely injured patients and mortality in German trauma hospitals

BACKGROUND

The issue of patient volume related to trauma outcomes is still under debate. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between number of severely injured patients treated and mortality in German trauma hospitals.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® (2009-2013). The inclusion criteria were patients in Germany with a severe trauma injury (defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 16), and with data available for calculation of Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) II score. Patients transferred early were excluded. Outcome analysis (observed versus expected mortality obtained by RISC-II score) was performed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 39,289 patients were included. Mean(s.d.) age was 49.9(21.8) years, 27,824 (71.3 per cent) were male, mean(s.d.) ISS was 27.2(11.6) and 10,826 (29.2 per cent) had a Glasgow Coma Scale score below 8. Of 587 hospitals, 98 were level I, 235 level II and 254 level III trauma centres. There was no significant difference between observed and expected mortality in volume subgroups with 40-59, 60-79 or 80-99 patients treated per year. In the subgroups with 1-19 and 20-39 patients per year, the observed mortality was significantly greater than the predicted mortality (P < 0.050). High-volume hospitals had an absolute difference between observed and predicted mortality, suggesting a survival benefit of about 1 per cent compared with low-volume hospitals. Adjusted logistic regression analysis (including hospital level) identified patient volume as an independent positive predictor of survival (odds ratio 1.001 per patient per year; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The hospital volume of severely injured patients was identified as an independent predictor of survival. A clear cut-off value for volume could not be established, but at least 40 patients per year per hospital appeared beneficial for survival.

The epidemiology of Scottish trauma: A comparison of pre-hospital and in-hospital deaths, 2000 to 2011

AIMS

To characterise the temporal trends and urban-rural distribution of fatal injuries in Scotland through the analysis of mortality data collected by the National Records of Scotland.

METHODS

The prospectively collected NRS database was queried using ICD-10 codes for all Scottish trauma deaths during the period 2000 to 2011. Patients were divided into pre-hospital and in-hospital groups depending on the location of death. Incidence was plotted against time and linear regression was used to identify temporal trends.

RESULTS

A total of 13,100 deaths were analysed. There were 4755 (36.3%) patients in the pre-hospital group with a median age (IQR) of 42 (28-58) years. The predominant cause of pre-hospital death related to vehicular injury (27.8%), which had a decreasing trend over the study period (p = 0.004). In-hospital, patients had a median age of 80 (58-88) years and the majority (67.0%) of deaths occurred following a fall on the level. This trend was shown to increase over the decade of study (p = 0.020). In addition, the incidence of urban incidents remained static, but the rate of rural fatal trauma decreased (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Around a third of Scottish trauma patients die prior to hospital admission and the predominant mechanism of injury is due to road traffic accidents. This contrasts with in-hospital deaths, which are mainly observed in elderly patients following a fall from standing height. Further research is required to determine the preventability of fatal traumatic injury in Scotland.

Saving lives, limbs and livelihoods: considerations in restructuring a national trauma service

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Level 1 trauma centers reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes in major trauma. Despite this, many countries, including Ireland, do not have officially designated major trauma centers (MTC). This study aimed to examine international trauma systems, and determine how to "best fit" trauma care in a small country (Ireland) to international models.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed to examine international models of trauma systems. An estimate of Irish trauma burden and distribution was made using data from the Road Safety Authority (RSA) on serious or fatal RTAs. Models of a restructured trauma service were constructed and compared with international best practice.

RESULTS

Internationally, a major trauma center surrounded by a regional trauma network has emerged as the gold standard in trauma care. In Ireland, there are no nationally coordinated trauma networks and care is provided by 26 acute hospitals with a mean distance to hospital from RTAs of 20.6 km ± 15.6. Based on our population, Ireland needs two Level 1 MTCs (in the two areas of major population density in the east and south), with robust surrounding trauma networks including Level 2 or 3 trauma centers. With this model, the estimated mean number of cases per Level 1 MTC per year would be 628, with a mean distance to MTC of 80.5 ± 59.2 km, (maximum distance 263.5 km).

CONCLUSION

Clearly designated and adequately resourced MTCs with trauma networks are needed to improve trauma outcomes, with concomitant investment in pre-hospital infrastructure.

Optimizing trauma system design: the GEOS (Geospatial Evaluation of Systems of Trauma Care) approach

BACKGROUND

Trauma systems have been shown to reduce death and disability from injury but must be appropriately configured. A systematic approach to trauma system design can help maximize geospatial effectiveness and reassure stakeholders that the best configuration has been chosen.

METHODS

This article describes the GEOS [Geospatial Evaluation of Systems of Trauma Care] methodology, a mathematical modeling of a population-based data set, which aims to derive geospatially optimized trauma system configurations for a geographically defined setting. GEOS considers a region's spatial injury profile and the available resources and uses a combination of travel time analysis and multiobjective optimization. The methodology is described in general and with regard to its application to our case study of Scotland.

RESULTS

The primary outcome will be trauma system configuration.

CONCLUSION

GEOS will contribute to the design of a trauma system for Scotland. The methodology is flexible and inherently transferable to other settings and could also be used to provide assurance that the configuration of existing trauma systems is fit for purpose.

Demographic and geographical characteristics of pediatric trauma in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Trauma systems reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse the demographic and geospatial characteristics of pediatric trauma patients in Scotland, and determine the level of destination healthcare facility which injured children are taken to, to determine the need for, and general feasibility, of developing a pediatric trauma system for Scotland.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of incidents involving children aged 1-14 attended to by the Scottish Ambulance Service between 1 November 2008 and 31 October 2010. A subgroup with physiological derangement was defined. Incident location postcode was used to determine incident location by health board region, rurality and social deprivation. Destination healthcare facility was classified into one of six categories.

RESULTS

Of 10,759 incidents, 72.3% occurred in urban areas and 5.8% in remote areas. Incident location was associated with socioeconomic deprivation. Of the patients, 11.6% were taken to a pediatric hospital with pediatric intensive care facilities, 21.8% to a pediatric hospital without pediatric intensive care service, and 50.2% to an adult large general hospital without pediatric surgical service.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of incidents involving children with injuries occurred in urban areas. Half were taken to a hospital without pediatric surgical service. There was no difference between children with normal and deranged physiology.

Destination healthcare facility of shocked trauma patients in Scotland: analysis of transfusion and surgical capability of receiving hospitals

AIMS

Haemorrhage is a leading cause of death from trauma. Management requires a combination of haemorrhage control and resuscitation which may incur significant surgical and transfusion utilisation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the resource provision of the destination hospital of Scottish trauma patients exhibiting evidence of pre-hospital shock.

METHODS

Patients who sustained a traumatic injury between November 2008 and October 2010 were retrospectively identified from the Scottish Ambulance Service electronic patients record system. Patients with a systolic blood pressure less than 110 mmHg or if missing, a heart rate greater than 120 bpm, were considered in shock. The level of the destination healthcare facility was classified in terms of surgical and transfusion capability. Patients with and without shock were compared.

RESULTS

There were 135,004 patients identified, 133,651 (99.0%) of whom had sustained blunt trauma, 68,411 (50.7%) were male and the median (IQR) age was 59 (46). There were 6721 (5.0%) patients with shock, with a similar age and gender distribution to non-shocked patients. Only 1332 (19.8%) of shocked patients were taken to facilities with full surgical capability, 5137 (76.4%) to hospitals with limited (general and orthopaedic surgery only) and 252 (3.7%) to hospitals with no surgical services. In terms of transfusion capability, 5556 (82.7%) shocked patients were admitted to facilities with full capability and 1165 (17.3%) to a hospital with minimal or no capability.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Scottish trauma patients are transported to a hospital with full transfusion capability, although the majority lack surgical sub-specialty representation.