1
|
Cioffi SPB, Altomare M, Podda M, Spota A, Granieri S, Reitano E, Zamburlini B, Virdis F, Bini R, Gupta S, Torzilli G, Mingoli A, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S. The burden of the knowledge-to-action gap in acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9617-9632. [PMID: 37884735 PMCID: PMC10709474 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10449-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of emergency general surgery (EGS) is higher compared to elective surgery. Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most frequent diseases and its management is dictated by published international clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Adherence to CPG has been reported as heterogeneous. Barriers to clinical implementation were not studied. This study explored barriers to adherence to CPG and the clinico-economic impact of poor compliance. METHODS Data were extracted from the three-year data lock of the REsiDENT-1 registry, a prospective resident-led multicenter trial. We identified 7 items from CPG published from the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) and the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). We applied our classification proposal and used a five-point Likert scale (Ls) to assess laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) difficulty. Descriptive analyses were performed to explore compliance and group comparisons to assess the impact on outcomes and related costs. We ran logistic regressions to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of CPG. RESULTS From 2019 to 2022, 653 LA were included from 24 centers. 69 residents performed and coordinated data collection. We identified low compliance with recommendations on peritoneal irrigation (PI) (25.73%), abdominal drains (AD) (34.68%), and antibiotic stewardship (34.17%). Poor compliance on PI and AD was associated to higher infectious complications in uncomplicated AA. Hospitalizations were significantly longer in non-compliance except for PI in uncomplicated AA, and costs significantly higher, exception made for antibiotic stewardship in complicated AA. The strongest barriers to CPG implementation were complicated AA and technically challenging LA for PI and AD. Longer operative times and the use of PI negatively affected antibiotic stewardship in uncomplicated AA. Compliance was higher in teaching hospitals and in emergency surgery units. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed low compliance with standardized items influenced by environmental factors and non-evidence-based practices in complex LA. Antibiotic stewardship is sub-optimal. Not following CPG may not influence clinical complications but has an impact in terms of logistics, costs and on the non-measurable magnitude of antibiotic resistance. Structured educational interventions and institutional bundles are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Altomare
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrea Spota
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Elisa Reitano
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore Della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Beatrice Zamburlini
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- General Surgery Residency Program, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Virdis
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bini
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Mingoli
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Satheeskaran M, Hussan A, Anto A, de Preux L. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotic prophylaxis for acute cholecystectomy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2023; 10:e001162. [PMID: 37562856 PMCID: PMC10423775 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For acute cholecystitis, the treatment of choice is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In mild-to-moderate cases, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of postoperative infectious complications (POICs) lacks evidence regarding its cost-effectiveness when compared with no prophylaxis. In the context of rising antimicrobial resistance, there is a clear rationale for a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to determine the most efficient use of National Health Service resources and antibiotic routine usage. DESIGN 16 of 226 patients (7.1%) in the single-dose prophylaxis group and 29 of 231 (12.6%) in the non-prophylaxis group developed POICs. A CEA was carried out using health outcome data from thePerioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (PEANUTS II) multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, clinical trial. Costs were measured in monetary units using pound sterling, and effectiveness expressed as POICs avoided within the first 30 days after cholecystectomy. RESULTS This CEA produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -£792.70. This suggests a modest cost-effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis being marginally less costly and more effective than no prophylaxis. Three sensitivity analyses were executed considering full adherence to the antibiotic, POICs with increased complexity and break-point analysis suggesting caution in the recommendation of systematic use of antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of POICs. CONCLUSION The results of this CEA point to greater consensus in UK-based guidelines surrounding the provision of antibiotic prophylaxis for mild-to-moderate cases of acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Satheeskaran
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Aminah Hussan
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ailin Anto
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Laure de Preux
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nve E, Badia JM, Amillo-Zaragüeta M, Juvany M, Mourelo-Fariña M, Jorba R. Early Management of Severe Biliary Infection in the Era of the Tokyo Guidelines. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4711. [PMID: 37510826 PMCID: PMC10380792 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Sepsis of biliary origin is increasing worldwide and has become one of the leading causes of emergency department admissions. The presence of multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) is increasing, and mortality rates may reach 20%. This review focuses on the changes induced by the Tokyo guidelines and new concepts related to the early treatment of severe biliary disease. If cholecystitis or cholangitis is suspected, ultrasound is the imaging test of choice. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment should be initiated promptly, and selection should be performed while bearing in mind the severity and risk factors for MRB. In acute cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the main therapeutic intervention. In patients not suitable for surgery, percutaneous cholecystostomy is a valid alternative for controlling the infection. Treatment of severe acute cholangitis is based on endoscopic or transhepatic bile duct drainage and antibiotic therapy. Endoscopic ultrasound and other new endoscopic techniques have been added to the arsenal as novel alternatives in high-risk patients. However, biliary infections remain serious conditions that can lead to sepsis and death. The introduction of internationally accepted guidelines, based on clinical presentation, laboratory tests, and imaging, provides a framework for their rapid diagnosis and treatment. Prompt assessment of patient severity, timely initiation of antimicrobials, and early control of the source of infection are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Nve
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, 08221 Barcelona, Spain;
- School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, Spain;
| | - Josep M. Badia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Granollers, School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Av Francesc Ribas 1, 08402 Granollers, Spain; (M.A.-Z.); (M.J.)
| | - Mireia Amillo-Zaragüeta
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Granollers, School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Av Francesc Ribas 1, 08402 Granollers, Spain; (M.A.-Z.); (M.J.)
| | - Montserrat Juvany
- Department of Surgery, Hospital General Granollers, School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Av Francesc Ribas 1, 08402 Granollers, Spain; (M.A.-Z.); (M.J.)
| | - Mónica Mourelo-Fariña
- Intensive Care Unit, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - Rosa Jorba
- School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, Spain;
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thomas M, Baltatzis M, Price A, Fox J, Pearce L, Vilches-Moraga A. The influence of frailty on outcomes for older adults admitted to hospital with benign biliary disease: a single-centre, observational cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105:231-240. [PMID: 35616268 PMCID: PMC9974336 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence and complications of biliary disease increase with age. Frailty has been associated with adverse outcomes in the hospital setting. We describe the prevalence of frailty in older patients hospitalised with benign biliary disease and its association with duration of hospital stay, and 90-day and 1-year mortality. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 75 years and over admitted with acute biliary disease between 17 September 2014 and 20 March 2017. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score was recorded on admission. RESULTS We included 200 patients with a median age of 82 (75-99) years, 60% were female; 154 (77%) were independent for personal activities of daily living (ADLs) and 99 (49.5%) for instrumental ADLs. Cholecystitis was the most common diagnosis (43%) followed by cholangitis (36%) and pancreatitis (21%). Ninety-nine patients were non frail (NF; CFS 1-4) and 101 were frail (F; CFS 5-9). Some 104 patients received medical treatment only. Surgery was more common in NF patients (11% vs F 2%), percutaneous drainage more frequently performed in F patients (15% vs NF 5%) and endoscopic cholangiopancreatography was similar in both groups (F 32% vs NF 31%). Frailty was associated with worse clinical outcomes in F vs NF: functional deconditioning (34% vs 11%), increased care level (19% vs 3%), length of stay (12 vs 7 days), 90-day mortality (8% vs 3%) and 1-year mortality (48% vs 24%). CONCLUSIONS Half of patients in our cohort were frail and spent longer in hospital, were less likely to undergo surgery and were less likely to remain alive at 1 year after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Thomas
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, UK
| | - M Baltatzis
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, UK
| | - A Price
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, UK
| | - J Fox
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, UK
| | - L Pearce
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bass GA, Kaplan LJ, Ryan ÉJ, Cao Y, Lane-Fall M, Duffy CC, Vail EA, Mohseni S. The snapshot audit methodology: design, implementation and analysis of prospective observational cohort studies in surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:5-15. [PMID: 35840703 PMCID: PMC10606835 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02045-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For some surgical conditionns and scientific questions, the "real world" effectiveness of surgical patient care may be better explored using a multi-institutional time-bound observational cohort assessment approach (termed a "snapshot audit") than by retrospective review of administrative datasets or by prospective randomized control trials. We discuss when this might be the case, and present the key features of developing, deploying, and assessing snapshot audit outcomes data. METHODS A narrative review of snapshot audit methodology was generated using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guideline. Manuscripts were selected from domains including: audit design and deployment, statistical analysis, surgical therapy and technique, surgical outcomes, diagnostic testing, critical care management, concomitant non-surgical disease, implementation science, and guideline compliance. RESULTS Snapshot audits all conform to a similar structure: being time-bound, non-interventional, and multi-institutional. A successful diverse steering committee will leverage expertise that includes clinical care and data science, coupled with librarian services. Pre-published protocols (with specified aims and analyses) greatly helps site recruitment. Mentored trainee involvement at collaborating sites should be encouraged through manuscript contributorship. Current funding principally flows from medical professional organizations. CONCLUSION The snapshot audit approach to assessing current care provides insights into care delivery, outcomes, and guideline compliance while generating testable hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Bass
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden.
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Lewis J Kaplan
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 51 N. 39th Street, MOB 1, Suite 120, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yang Cao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Meghan Lane-Fall
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Caoimhe C Duffy
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Emily A Vail
- Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISC-LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation (CPORT), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 5 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, 309 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Orebro University Hospital and Faculty of School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81, Orebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Techniques for mesoappendix transection and appendix resection: insights from the ESTES SnapAppy study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:17-32. [PMID: 36693948 PMCID: PMC9925585 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02191-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgically managed appendicitis exhibits great heterogeneity in techniques for mesoappendix transection and appendix amputation from its base. It is unclear whether a particular surgical technique provides outcome benefit or reduces complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS We undertook a pre-specified subgroup analysis of all patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at index admission during SnapAppy (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT04365491). We collected routine, anonymized observational data regarding surgical technique, patient demographics and indices of disease severity, without change to clinical care pathway or usual surgeon preference. Outcome measures of interest were the incidence of complications, unplanned reoperation, readmission, admission to the ICU, death, hospital length of stay, and procedure duration. We used Poisson regression models with robust standard errors to calculate incident rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Three-thousand seven hundred sixty-eight consecutive adult patients, included from 71 centers in 14 countries, were followed up from date of admission for 90 days. The mesoappendix was divided hemostatically using electrocautery in 1564(69.4%) and an energy device in 688(30.5%). The appendix was amputated by division of its base between looped ligatures in 1379(37.0%), with a stapler in 1421(38.1%) and between clips in 929(24.9%). The technique for securely dividing the appendix at its base in acutely inflamed (AAST Grade 1) appendicitis was equally divided between division between looped ligatures, clips and stapled transection. However, the technique used differed in complicated appendicitis (AAST Grade 2 +) compared with uncomplicated (Grade 1), with a shift toward transection of the appendix base by stapler (58% vs. 38%; p < 0.001). While no statistical difference in outcomes could be detected between different techniques for division of appendix base, decreased risk of any [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.41-0.82), p = 0.002] and severe [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 0.33 (0.11-0.96), p = 0.045] complications could be detected when using energy devices. CONCLUSIONS Safe mesoappendix transection and appendix resection are accomplished using heterogeneous techniques. Technique selection for both mesoappendix transection and appendix resection correlates with AAST grade. Higher grade led to more ultrasonic tissue transection and stapled appendix resection. Higher AAST appendicitis grade also correlated with infection-related complication occurrence. Despite the overall well-tolerated heterogeneity of approaches to acute appendicitis, increasing disease acuity or complexity appears to encourage homogeneity of intraoperative surgical technique toward advanced adjuncts.
Collapse
|
7
|
The Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: User Trends Among Residents and Consultants. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY, ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES 2022; 32:453-461. [PMID: 35881992 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Critical View of Safety (CVS) aims at preventing bile duct injuries (BDIs) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC). This study investigated CVS utilization among surgeons. METHODS Photos from LCCs were scored for satisfactory CVS. Rates of satisfactory CVS, BDIs, and postoperative complications among residents and consultants were compared. A lecture on CVS was given halfway through the study. RESULTS The study comprised 1532 patients. Residents had higher rates of satisfactory CVS in elective LCCs compared with consultants (34.9% vs. 23.0%, P<0.001), but not in emergency LCCs (18.4% vs. 15.0%, P=0.252). No significant differences in BDIs or postoperative complications emerged between residents and consultants. After the lecture, elective LCCs were photographed more frequently (80.3% vs. 74.0%, P=0.032), but rates of satisfactory CVS, BDIs, and postoperative complications remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS Utilization of CVS can be affected by a single lecture but affecting rates of satisfactory CVS may require stronger interventions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Surgeons have hesitated early cholecystectomy because of cardiovascular comorbidities during adoption of guidelines. Sci Rep 2022; 12:502. [PMID: 35017567 PMCID: PMC8752855 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04479-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of the guidelines has resulted in an increase of laparoscopic surgeries performed, but the rate of early surgery was still low. Here, the initial effect of the introduction of the guideline was confirmed in single center, and factors disturbing early cholecystectomy were analyzed. This study included 141 patients who were treated for acute cholecystitis from January 2010 to October 2014 at Kanazawa Medical Center. Each patient was assigned into a group according to when they received treatment. Patients in Group A were treated before the Tokyo Guidelines were introduced (n = 48 cases), those in Group B were treated after the introduction of the guidelines (93 cases). After the introduction of the guidelines, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly increased (P < 0.001), however, the rate of early operations was still 38.7% only. There are many cases with cardiovascular disease in delayed group, the prevalence had reached 50% as compared with early group of 24% (P < 0.01). Approximately 25% of patients continued antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. In the early days of guidelines introduction, the factor which most disturbed early surgery was the coexistence of cardiovascular disease. These contents could be described in the next revision of the guidelines.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bass GA, Gillis AE, Cao Y, Mohseni S. Patients over 65 years with Acute Complicated Calculous Biliary Disease are Treated Differently-Results and Insights from the ESTES Snapshot Audit. World J Surg 2021; 45:2046-2055. [PMID: 33813631 PMCID: PMC8154793 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accrued comorbidities are perceived to increase operative risk. Surgeons may offer operative treatments less often to their older patients with acute complicated calculous biliary disease (ACCBD). We set out to capture ACCBD incidence in older patients across Europe and the currently used treatment algorithms. METHODS The European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) undertook a snapshot audit of patients undergoing emergency hospital admission for ACCBD between October 1 and 31 2018, comparing patients under and ≥ 65 years. Mortality, postoperative complications, time to operative intervention, post-acute disposition, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared between groups. Within the ≥ 65 cohort, comorbidity burden, mortality, LOS, and disposition outcomes were further compared between patients undergoing operative and non-operative management. RESULTS The median age of the 338 admitted patients was 67 years; 185 patients (54.7%) of these were the age of 65 or over. Significantly fewer patients ≥ 65 underwent surgical treatment (37.8% vs. 64.7%, p < 0.001). Surgical complications were more frequent in the ≥ 65 cohort than younger patients, and the mean postoperative LOS was significantly longer. Postoperative mortality was seen in 2.2% of patients ≥ 65 (vs. 0.7%, p = 0.253). However, operated elderly patients did not differ from non-operated in terms of comorbidity burden, mortality, LOS, or post-discharge rehabilitation need. CONCLUSIONS Few elderly patients receive surgical treatment for ACCBD. Expectedly, postoperative morbidity, LOS, and the requirement for post-discharge rehabilitation are higher in the elderly than younger patients but do not differ from elderly patients managed non-operatively. With multidisciplinary perioperative optimization, elderly patients may be safely offered optimal treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial # NCT03610308).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A. Bass
- Division of Traumatology, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81 Orebro, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| | - Amy E. Gillis
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| | - Yang Cao
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 701 82 Orebro, Sweden
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, 702 81 Orebro, Sweden
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, 701 85 Orebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bass GA, Pourlotfi A, Donnelly M, Ahl R, McIntyre C, Flod S, Cao Y, McNamara D, Sarani B, Gillis AE, Mohseni S. Bile duct clearance and cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: Definitive single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus staged procedures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90:240-248. [PMID: 33075026 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical equipoise exists regarding optimal sequencing in the definitive management of choledocholithiasis. Our current study compares sequential biliary ductal clearance and cholecystectomy at an interval to simultaneous laparoendoscopic management on index admission in a pragmatic retrospective manner. METHODS Records were reviewed for all patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2018 to a Swedish and an Irish university hospital. Both hospitals differ in their practice patterns for definitive management of choledocholithiasis. At the Swedish hospital, patients with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at index admission (one stage). In contrast, interval day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed index admission ERCP (two stages) at the Irish hospital. Clinical characteristics, postprocedural complications, and inpatient duration were compared between cohorts. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-seven patients underwent treatment for choledocholithiasis during the study period, of whom 222 (62.2%) underwent a one-stage procedure in Sweden, while 135 (37.8%) underwent treatment in two stages in Ireland. Patients in both cohorts were closely matched in terms of age, sex, and preoperative serum total bilirubin. Patients in the one-stage group exhibited a greater inflammatory reaction on index admission (peak C-reactive protein, 136 ± 137 vs. 95 ± 102 mg/L; p = 0.024), had higher incidence of comorbidities (age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, ≥3; 37.8% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.003), and overall were less fit for surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ≥3; 11.7% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Despite this, a significantly shorter mean time to definitive treatment, that is, cholecystectomy (3.1 ± 2.5 vs. 40.3 ± 127 days, p = 0.017), without excess morbidity, was seen in the one-stage compared with the two-stage cohort. Patients in the one-stage cohort experienced shorter mean postprocedure length of stay (3.0 ± 4.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.6 days, p < 0.001) and total length of hospital stay (6.5 ± 4.6 vs. 9.0 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.002). The only significant difference in postoperative complications between the cohorts was urinary retention, with a higher incidence in the one-stage cohort (19% vs. 1%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Where appropriate expertise and logistics exist within developing models of acute care surgery worldwide, consideration should be given to index-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Our data suggest that this strategy significantly shortens the time to definitive treatment and decreases total hospital stay without any excess in adverse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Bass
- From the Departments of Surgery (G.A.B., M.D., C.M., A.E.G.) and Gastroenterology (D.M.), Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Division of Traumatology (G.A.B.), Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Penn Medicine, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia; School of Medical Sciences (G.A.B., A.P., R.A., Y.C., S.M.), Orebro University, Sweden; Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery (A.P., S.F., S.M.), Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden; Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.A.), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (R.A.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Y.C.), School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden; Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery (B.S.), George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Donnellan E, Coulter J, Mathew C, Choynowski M, Flanagan L, Bucholc M, Johnston A, Sugrue M. A meta-analysis of the use of intraoperative cholangiography; time to revisit our approach to cholecystectomy? Surg Open Sci 2021; 3:8-15. [PMID: 33937738 PMCID: PMC8076912 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite some evidence of improved survival with intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy, debate has raged about its benefit, in part because of its questionable benefit, time, and resources required to complete. METHODS An International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews-registered (ID CRD42018102154) meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from 2003 to 2018 was undertaken including search strategy "intraoperative AND cholangiogra* AND cholecystectomy." Articles scoring ≥ 16 for comparative and ≥ 10 for noncomparative using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were included. A dichotomous random effects meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method performed on Review Manager Version 5.3 was carried out. RESULTS Of 2,059 articles reviewed, 62 met criteria for final analysis. The mean rate of intraoperative cholangiography was 38.8% (range 1.6%-96.4%).There was greater detection of bile duct stones during cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography compared with selective intraoperative cholangiography (odds ratio = 3.28, confidence interval = 2.80-3.86, P value < .001). While bile duct injury during cholecystectomy was less with intraoperative cholangiography (0.39%) than without intraoperative cholangiography (0.43%), it was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.88, confidence interval = 0.65-1.19, P value = .41). Readmission following cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography was 3.0% compared to 3.5% without intraoperative cholangiography (odds ratio = 0.91, confidence interval = 0.78-1.06, P value = .23). CONCLUSION The use of intraoperative cholangiography still has its place in cholecystectomy based on the detection of choledocholithiasis and the potential reduction of unfavorable outcomes associated with common bile duct stones. This meta-analysis, the first to review intraoperative cholangiography use, identified a marked variation in cholangiography use. Retrospective studies limit the ability to critically define association between intraoperative cholangiography use and bile duct injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin Donnellan
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jonathan Coulter
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
- EU INTERREG Emergency Surgery Outcome Advancement Project, Centre for Personalised Medicine, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Cherian Mathew
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Michelle Choynowski
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
| | - Louise Flanagan
- EU INTERREG Emergency Surgery Outcome Advancement Project, Centre for Personalised Medicine, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Magda Bucholc
- Intelligent Systems Research Centre, School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Londonderry, Northern Ireland
| | - Alison Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital and Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland
- EU INTERREG Emergency Surgery Outcome Advancement Project, Centre for Personalised Medicine, Letterkenny, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marziali I, Cicconi S, Marilungo F, Benedetti M, Ciano P, Pagano P, D'Emidio F, Guercioni G, Catarci M. Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in all-comers with acute cholecystitis according to current guidelines in a general surgical unit. Updates Surg 2020; 73:473-480. [PMID: 33058055 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00897-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is a very common complication of gallstone-related disease. Its currently recommended management changes according to severity of disease and fitness for surgery. The aim of this observational study is to assess the short- and long-term outcomes in all-comers admitted with diagnosis of ACC, treated according to 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13). A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively maintained database of 125 patients with diagnosis of ACC consecutively admitted between January 2017 and September 2019, subdivided in three groups according to TG13: percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC group), cholecystectomy (CH group), and conservative medical treatment (MT group). The primary end point was a composite of morbidity and/or mortality rates; the secondary end points were ACC recurrence, readmission, need for cholecystectomy rates and overall length of hospital stay (LOS). After a median follow-up of 639 days, overall morbidity rate was 20.8% and mortality rate was 6.4%. Death was directly related to AC during the index admission in two out of eight cases. There were no significant differences in primary end point according to the treatment group. Concerning secondary end points, ACC recurrence rate was not significantly different after PC (10.0%) or MT (9.1%); the readmission rates were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the MT group (48.5%) and in the PC group (25.0%) than in the CH group (5.8%); need for cholecystectomy rates was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the MT group (42.4%) than in the PC group (20.0%); median overall LOS was significantly higher in the PC (16 days) than in the MT (9 days) and than in the CH group (5 days). PC is an effective and safe rescue procedure in high-risk patients with ACC, representing a definitive treatment in 80% of cases of this specific subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Marziali
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Simone Cicconi
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Fabio Marilungo
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Michele Benedetti
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Paolo Ciano
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Paolo Pagano
- Interventional Radiology Units, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Fabio D'Emidio
- Interventional Radiology Units, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Guercioni
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- General Surgery, "C. e G. Mazzoni" Hospital, ASUR Marche AV5, Via degli Iris snc, 63100, Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patterns of prevalence and contemporary clinical management strategies in complicated acute biliary calculous disease: an ESTES 'snapshot audit' of practice. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 48:23-35. [PMID: 32632631 PMCID: PMC8825627 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01433-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Acute complications of biliary calculi are common, morbid, and complex to manage. Variability exists in the techniques utilized to treat these conditions at an individual surgeon and unit level. Aim To identify, through an international prospective nonrandomized cohort study, the epidemiology and areas of practice variability in management of acute complicated calculous biliary disease (ACCBD) and to correlate them against reported outcomes. Methods A preplanned analysis of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) 2018 Complicated Biliary Calculous Disease audit was performed. Patients undergoing emergency hospital admission with ACCBD between 1 October 2018 and 31 October 2018 were included. All eligible patients with acute complicated biliary calculous disease were recorded contemporaneously using a standardized predetermined protocol and a secure online database and followed-up through to 60 days from their admission. Endpoints A two-stage data collection strategy collecting patient demographics, details of operative, endoscopic and radiologic intervention, and outcome metrics. Outcome measures included mortality, surgical morbidity, ICU stay, timing of operative intervention, and length of hospital stay. Results Three hundred thirty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 65 years and 54% were female. Diagnosis at admission were: cholecystitis (45.6%), biliary pancreatitis (21%), choledocholithiasis with and without cholangitis (13.9% and 18%). Index admission cholecystectomy was performed in just 50% of cases, and 28% had an ERCP performed. Morbidity and mortality were low. Conclusion This first ESTES snapshot audit, a purely descriptive collaborative study, gives rich ‘real world’ insights into local variability in surgical practice as compared to international guidelines, and how this may impact upon outcomes. These granular data will serve to improve overall patient care as well as being hypothesis generating and inform areas needing future prospective study.
Collapse
|