Directional coronary atherectomy for failed angioplasty due to occlusive coronary dissection

Abrupt vessel closure: changing importance, management, and consequences

Percutaneous coronary interventions have been performed for 20 years. Despite the success and progress of these interventions, abrupt vessel closure has been a dramatic adverse event of coronary interventions. Closure has frequently led to the major complications of death, myocardial infarction, and emergency coronary artery bypass. Because of the fear of this adverse event and its subsequent complications, the applicability of coronary interventions is sometimes limited. The pathologic characteristics of abrupt vessel closure have been recognized as predominantly caused by dissection, with vessel recoil and thrombus formation playing important secondary roles. The recognition of the lesions at risk for abrupt vessel closure has led to a strategy of lesion-specific device therapy to reduce complications. Similarly the role of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies have reduced complications. The earliest methods of dealing with abrupt closure was emergency coronary artery bypass surgery with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. With the advent of second-generation devices and techniques, particularly stents, the management of abrupt vessel closure has been simplified and alternatives to emergency coronary bypass are more available. This article will review the history and current status of the prevention and management of abrupt vessel closure and demonstrate that anticipation and management of this complication have been facilitated with reduction of subsequent complications and increased applicability of coronary interventions.

Aortic dissection extending from the left coronary artery during percutaneous coronary angioplasty

A 72-year-old woman with acute aortic dissection as a complication of percutaneous coronary angioplasty was successfully treated. She received a graft replacement of the ascending aorta as well as triple coronary artery bypass grafts. The dissection had extended from the left coronary artery. Although acute aortic dissection is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary angioplasty, physicians and cardiac surgeons should keep its potential occurrence in mind.

Short- and long-term clinical effects of primary directional coronary atherectomy for acute myocardial infarction

We performed primary directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) without antecedent thrombolytic therapy in 21 of 67 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hr of onset between June 1993-March 1994. Reperfusion with primary DCA was successful in 18 patients (85.7%, group D). Results were compared with those of primary balloon angioplasty patients treated between June 1992-May 1993 (group P). Minimum lumen diameter (MLD) values both immediately after reperfusion and in predischarge angiograms were significantly larger in group D than in group P, but were similar in late follow-up angiograms. Although a larger MLD in group D than in group P contributed to the prevention of reocclusion of the coronary artery before discharge in DCA patients, a high rate of restenosis at late follow-up canceled the beneficial effects of primary DCA.

Changes in patient treatment after abrupt closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a historic perspective

This study compares the incidence and management of acute closure complicating coronary angioplasty in three historic populations of patients having undergone the procedure at the same center: group 1 (n = 146 of 881) ("early years" of angioplasty, 1980 to 1986), group 2 (n = 113 of 1781) (bailout stenting learning curve, 1990 to 1992), and group 3 (n = 34 of 525) (1993). The incidence of acute closure decreased from group 1 (146 [17%] of 881) to groups 2 and 3 (147 [6%] of 2306); (p < 0.001). Management of the occlusion changed over the years, with less emergency coronary bypass surgery ([36%] 52 of 146, 15 [13%] 113, and 3 [9%] of 34), respectively, p < 0.01) and more repeat angioplasty (70 [48%] of 146; 87 [78%], of 113, and 30 [88%] of 34, p < 0.001). The use of prolonged inflations (> 10 minutes) and stenting increased from group 2 (15 [13%] of 113 and 16 [14%] of 113, respectively) to group 3 (12 [35%] of 34, and 10 [30%] of 34, respectively). In-hospital death occurred in 18 (12%) of 146, 7 (6%) of 113), and (2 (6%) of 34) patients in the three groups. Acute myocardial infarction decreased from 64% to 46% and 27%, respectively (p < 0.01). Overall, the number of patients free of events at hospital discharge increased from 38 (26%) of 146 to 53 (47%) of 113 (p < 0.001) and to 23 (68%) of 34 (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Multicenter evaluation of the Strecker tantalum stent for acute coronary occlusion after angioplasty

The Strecker stent is a balloon-expandable, flexible endoprosthesis constructed of knitted tantalum wire and has been implanted successfully in peripheral arteries. This study presents the first multicenter experience with implantation of this radiopaque device in the coronary arteries in 64 patients of 6591 consecutive percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) procedures complicated by abrupt closure. In all except 1 patient the stents (n = 72) were correctly placed, and flow could be reestablished immediately. During hospitalization 12 (19%) patients had stent closures; 5 (8%) patients had Q-wave myocardial infarctions; and 13 (20%) patients underwent bypass surgery (4 on an emergency basis). The in-hospital mortality was 9%: 2 patients died after thrombotic stent occlusions; 2 patients had fatal bleeding complications; and 2 patients died after bypass surgery. Major bleeding complications at the puncture site were observed in 8 (12.5%) patients. Angiograms (n = 45) after 17 +/- 5 weeks revealed a stent patency rate of 89%. Thus the Strecker coronary stent proved to be helpful in the management of acute vessel closure during PTCA. However, in this first series a high incidence of early thrombotic occlusions and bleeding complications warrants close anticoagulation monitoring and limits broader indications.

Initial clinical experiences with rescue unipolar radiofrequency thermal balloon angioplasty after abrupt or threatened vessel closure complicating elective conventional balloon coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency thermal balloon angioplasty and rescue procedure after abrupt or threatened vessel closure complicating elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Coronary angioplasty is an established therapy for ischemic heart disease. However, abrupt closure after successful angioplasty remains a serious problem.

METHOD

We utilized a unipolar radiofrequency balloon in which a radiofrequency potential of 13.56 MHz was transmitted between the coil within the balloon and a plate electrode attached to the patient's body. The temperature within the balloon could be monitored through a thermistor within the balloon. From October 1991 through December 1993, 31 patients who had abrupt or threatened vessel closure during 1,005 consecutive elective coronary angioplasty procedures were randomly assigned to radiofrequency balloon angioplasty or to other procedures as rescue

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were assigned to radiofrequency balloon angioplasty (5 with abrupt vessel closure and 10 with threatened closure). The average balloon temperature and inflation time were 62 +/- 9 degrees C and 129 +/- 62 s, respectively. Percent diameter stenosis decreased from 87 +/- 14% to 36 +/- 25% (p < 0.01). The procedure was successful in 14 patients. The rate of restenosis was 67%, but the success rate of repeat conventional coronary angioplasty for restenosed lesions was 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency balloon angioplasty is effective in the treatment of abrupt or threatened vessel closure complicating elective coronary angioplasty even though the procedure is associated with a relatively high rate of restenosis.

"Rescue" directional coronary atherectomy after unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome in patients who underwent directional coronary atherectomy after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective computerized data bank search of patients in whom unsuccessful balloon angioplasty and subsequent "rescue" coronary atherectomy had been performed at the Mayo Clinic between Nov. 1, 1988, and May 1, 1993.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Among the 336 patients who underwent directional coronary atherectomy during the study period, in 16 the procedure was a rescue attempt. The mean age of these 16 study patients was 67 years. The following vessels were treated: left anterior descending coronary artery, six patients; right coronary artery, six; circumflex artery, two; and saphenous vein graft, two. Coronary angioplasty had failed because of dissection in eight patients, elastic recoil without evident dissection in seven, and recurrent thrombus without evident dissection in one.

RESULTS

After coronary atherectomy, the mean stenosis was 41% (in comparison with 90% before coronary angioplasty and 71% after coronary angioplasty). Both angiographic success (20% or more decrease in stenosis after tissue removal and a final stenosis of less than 50%) and clinical success (angiographic success without in-hospital Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass operation, or death) were achieved in 10 patients. Adventitia was obtained in two patients, both of whom underwent atherectomy for elastic recoil. In six patients, a stenosis of more than 50% remained after atherectomy; one patient suffered a Q-wave myocardial infarction, and one underwent emergent coronary artery bypass grafting. No deaths occurred in the study group. During follow-up (mean, 22 +/- 19 months), one patient suffered a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, and two others underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Eleven patients were asymptomatic at last contact. Repeated angiography, done in five patients a mean of 3.4 +/- 3.1 months after the procedure, showed restenosis in three.

CONCLUSION

Rescue directional coronary atherectomy seems to be safe and effective in achieving angiographic and clinical successes in carefully selected patients after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty.

Spontaneous coronary dissection treated with directional coronary atherectomy

We report a case of spontaneous coronary dissection occurring in a middle aged male which was treated with thrombolytic therapy and directional coronary atherectomy. This technique provides a new option for treating this entity in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Multicenter clinical experience with rescue atherectomy for failed angioplasty

Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) has been proposed as a "rescue" technique for failed or suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in an attempt to avoid myocardial infarction or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. In this report we review the utilization and outcome of rescue atherectomy from the clinical experience of The Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Medical College of Virginia from November 1988 through January 1993, and from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) database. This analysis includes 100 patients with 103 treated lesions from 44 patients at the Cleveland Clinic, 36 patients from the Medical College of Virginia, and 20 patients from the CAVEAT database. The etiology of failed PTCA was primarily from dissection in 52 lesions (50.5%), "recoil" in 43 lesions (41.8%), and recurrent thrombosis in 8 lesions (7.8%). Complete vessel closure was present in 23 lesions (22.3%). The vessels treated included 51.5% left anterior descending, 24.3% right coronary, and 16.5% circumflex coronary arteries. The average reference vessel diameter in the group was 3.10 +/- 0.06 mm (SEM), with an average stenosis of 78.9 +/- 1.2% before PTCA, 55.8 +/- 2.4% after PTCA, and 24.1 +/- 2.2% after rescue DCA. DCA was successful (Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow with > 20% stenosis reduction without death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or coronary artery bypass grafting) in 94 of 103 lesions (91.3%). Complications included 1 patient with perforation (1%), 2 deaths within 24 hours (2.0%), and 6 patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (6%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Experience with directional coronary atherectomy since pre-market approval

Directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Pre-Market Approval in September 1990 and was then released through formal training certification of physicians at each new site. Procedure volume has increased dramatically since approval, with > 17,000 DCA procedures performed in 1991 and a cumulative total of > 33,000 procedures by mid-1992, at > 670 centers in the United States. Clinical application and results since approval have generally been similar to preapproval multicenter investigational results. Comparison of pre- and postapproval usage at the Medical College of Virginia shows similar baseline characteristics and indications, although recent patients show a higher proportion of "salvage" DCA for failed or suboptimal angioplasty (6% vs 14%) or DCA in combination with multidevice multiple vessel intervention (30% vs 38%). Overall results in 300 patients and 345 procedures included procedural success in 95%, clinical success in 94%, with major complications in 4.6% (including urgent bypass surgery in 3.8%, Q wave myocardial infarction in 1.7%, and hospital mortality in 0.3%). Results before and after FDA approval were similar for procedural success (94% vs 96%), clinical success rate (94% vs 94%), and major complications (5.5% vs 4.4%). There was a trend toward lower urgent surgery rate (5.4% vs 3.3%) in the more recent experience. In addition to its established efficacy for highly eccentric lesions, newer applications for which DCA is being used following FDA approval include treatment of saphenous vein grafts, thrombus-associated lesions, aorto-ostial lesions, failed or suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty result, bifurcation lesions, and use as part of multivessel intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coronary stenting for treatment of acute or threatened closure following dissection after coronary balloon angioplasty

We studied 32 patients (age 58 +/- 9 years) who had been treated with a Palmaz-Schatz stent after significant dissection complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We attempted to cover the entire site of dissection with prosthesis. The presence of dissection after PTCA was associated with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0 to 1 flow in 19 patients and grade 2 flow in 13. The stented arteries were: left anterior descending artery in 19 patients, right coronary artery in seven, and left circumflex artery in five. A single stent was implanted in 11 and multiple stents in 21 patients. Angiographic success was achieved in 30 patients (94%). Two patients (6%) had urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, two (6%) had a myocardial infarction, and one (3%) patient died. Subacute occlusion occurred in one patient (3%). Angiographic restenosis was found in three of nine patients (33%) with a single stent and 11 of 17 (65%) with multiple stents. Clinical follow-up at 11 +/- 3 months showed the necessity of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in two patients and repeat PTCA in nine (31%). We conclude that coronary stenting is an effective treatment for significant coronary dissection after PTCA with an acceptable incidence of major cardiac events at follow-up.