Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a cornerstone in cancer evaluation imaging, with a well-established history spanning several years. This imaging modality, encompassing the examination of the body from the base of the skull to the upper thighs, comprehensively covers the chest and abdominopelvic regions in a singular scan, allowing for a holistic assessment of nearly the entire body, including areas of marginal interest. The inherent advantage of this expansive scan range lies in its potential to unveil unexpected incidental abnormal hypermetabolic areas. The identification of incidental focal FDG uptake within colorectal regions during PET/CT scans is not an uncommon occurrence, albeit fraught with challenges associated with non-specific FDG uptake. The presence of benign colorectal lesions or physiological uptake poses a particular obstacle, as these may manifest with FDG uptake levels that mimic malignancy. Consequently, physicians are confronted with a diagnostic dilemma when encountering abnormal FDG uptake in unexpected colorectal areas. Existing studies have presented divergent results concerning these uptakes. Standardized uptake value and its derivatives have served as pivotal metrics in quantifying FDG uptake in PET images. In this article, we aim to succinctly explore the distinctive characteristics of FDG, delve into imaging findings, and elucidate the clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal uptake. This discussion aims to contribute valuable insights into the nuanced interpretation of such findings, fostering a comprehensive understanding.

Clinical significance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of incidental pre-malignant and malignant colonic lesions: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathological results

BACKGROUND

Incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, observed during positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, attracts particular attention due to its potential to represent both benign and pre-malignant/malignant lesions. Early detection and excision of these lesions are crucial for preventing cancer development and reducing mortality. This research aims to evaluate the correlation between incidental colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT with colonoscopic and histopathological results.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on data from all patients who underwent PET/CT between December 2019 and December 2023 in our hospital. The study included 79 patients with incidental colonic FDG uptake who underwent endoscopy. Patient characteristics, imaging parameters, and the corresponding colonoscopy and histopathological results were studied. A comparative analysis was performed among the findings from each of these modalities. The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax for 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis of premalignant and malignant lesions was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax and the combined parameters of SUVmax and colonic wall thickening (CWT) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 79 patients with incidental colorectal FDG uptake, histopathology revealed malignancy in 22 (27.9%) patients and premalignant polyps in 22 (27.9%) patients. Compared to patients with benign lesions, patients with premalignant and malignant lesions were more likely to undergo a PET/CT scan for primary evaluation (p = 0.013), and more likely to have focal GIT uptake (p = 0.001) and CWT (p = 0.001). A ROC curve analysis was made and assesed a cut-off value of 7.66 SUVmax (sensitivity: 64.9% and specificity: 82.4%) to distinguish premalignant and malignant lesions from benign lesions. The AUCs of the SUVmax and the combined parameters of SUVmax and CWT were 0.758 and 0.832 respectively.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergo PET/CT for primary evaluation, imaging features of colorectal focal FDG uptake and CWT were more closely associated with premalignant and malignant lesions. The SUVmax helps determine benign and premalignant/malignant lesions of the colorectum. Moreover, the combination of SUVmax and CWT parameters have higher accuracy in estimating premalignant and malignant lesions than SUVmax.

Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?

Since the inception of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) utilizing F-18 FDG has become widely accepted as a valuable imaging modality in the field of oncology, with global prevalence in clinical practice. Given that a single Torso PET/CT scan encompasses the anatomical region from the skull base to the upper thigh, the detection of incidental abnormal focal hypermetabolism in areas of limited clinical interest is both feasible and not uncommon. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to delineate the distinctive features of these findings, yet the outcomes have proven inconclusive. The incongruent results of these studies present a challenge for physicians, leaving them uncertain about the appropriate course of action. This article provides a succinct overview of the characteristics of fluorodeoxyglucose, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the imaging findings and clinical significance associated with incidental focal abnormal F-18 FDG activity in several representative organs. In conclusion, while the prevalence of unrecognized malignancy varies across organs, malignancies account for a substantial proportion, ranging from approximately one-third to over half, of incidental focal uptake. In light of these rates, physicians are urged to exercise vigilance in not disregarding unexpected uptake, facilitating more assured clinical decisions, and advocating for further active evaluation.

Endoscopic Evaluation of PET/CT Abnormalities in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Yield and Approach

BACKGROUND

Unexpected hypermetabolic activity is often encountered in the gastrointestinal tract when PET/CT is performed for various indications, prompting endoscopic evaluation. Our aim was to characterize the types of lesions seen in segments of the gastrointestinal tract with unexpected PET/CT abnormalities as well as clinically significant lesions seen on endoscopy which did not produce a PET/CT abnormality to guide the endoscopist tasked with evaluating these imaging findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of endoscopies performed at City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center between January 1, 2016 and September 30, 2021 for an indication of "abnormal PET." We divided the gastrointestinal tract into segments and defined categories of endoscopic/histologic findings for each segment. We counted the number of segments with an abnormal PET/CT finding and corresponding endoscopic/histologic abnormality as well as the number of segments with an endoscopic/histologic abnormality but normal PET/CT.

RESULTS

PET/CT identified 209 segments with hypermetabolic activity, 109 of which had corresponding endoscopic/histologic abnormalities. In the jejunum and ileum, all corresponding lesions were malignant. Seventy-three percent of corresponding lesions in the stomach were H. pylori positive. PET/CT failed to detect 34.7% of clinically significant lesions diagnosed endoscopically, including 1 malignancy in the transverse colon and many inflammatory or low-risk premalignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT abnormalities seen in the small bowel should be evaluated urgently as nearly all correlates were malignant, while abnormalities in the stomach should prompt workup for H. pylori. Most lesions missed by PET/CT were inflammatory or low-risk premalignant yet clinically significant, confirming the need to inspect the entirety of the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract during endoscopy.

A novel objective method for discriminating pathological and physiological colorectal uptake in the lower abdominal region using whole-body dynamic 18F-FDG-PET

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the center-of-mass shift distance (CMSD) analysis on whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (WBD-PET) with continuous bed motion is an objective index for discriminating pathological and physiological uptake in the lower abdominal colon.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the CMSD in 39 patients who underwent delayed imaging to detect incidental focal uptake that was difficult to determine as pathological and physiological on a conventional early-PET (early) image reconstructed by 5-phase WBD-PET images. The CMSD between each phase of WBD-PET images and between conventional early and delayed (two-phase) PET images were classified into pathological and physiological uptake groups based on endoscopic histology or other imaging diagnostics. The diagnostic performance of CMSD analysis on WBD-PET images was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis and compared to that of two-phase PET images.

RESULTS

A total of 66 incidental focal uptake detected early image were classified into 19 and 47 pathological and physiological uptake groups, respectively. The CMSD on WBD-PET and two-phase PET images in the pathological uptake group was significantly lower than that in the physiological uptake group (p < 0.01), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in CMSD analysis on WBD-PET images at the optimal cutoff of 5.2 mm estimated by the Youden index were 94.7%, 89.4%, and 89.4%, respectively, which were not significantly different (p = 0.74) from those of two-phase PET images.

CONCLUSIONS

The CMSD analysis on WBD-PET was useful in discriminating pathological and physiological colorectal uptake in the lower abdominal region, and its diagnostic performance was comparable to that of two-phase PET images. We suggested that CMSD analysis on WBD-PET images would be a novel objective method to omit unnecessary additional delayed imaging.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging

Objectives:

The present study aimed to identify the prevalence of focal uptake in the colon on ¹⁸fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies performed for the evaluation of malignancies other than colon, to detect the rate of malignancy in incidental focal ¹⁸F-FDG avid colonic lesions and to investigate if any possible role of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) values in the discrimination of malignant lesions from premalignant and benign ones exist.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the files of 8,017 patients with known or suspected malignancy, who underwent whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT at our institution during the period November 2017 to November 2019. Patients showing a single site of focally increased colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake that was more intense compared to liver uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG PET studies and referred to colonoscopy were enrolled in the study.

Results:

Fifty two patients (83.8%) had at least 1 corresponding lesion on colonoscopy, whereas in 10 patients no lesion was detected. Subsequent histopathological examinations revealed no corresponding lesion in 13 (13.7%), a benign lesion in 18 (18.9%), hyperplastic polyp in 10 (10.5%), low-grade polyp in 16 (16.8%), high-grade polyp in 29 (30.5%) and malignant lesion in 9 (9.5%) of the focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake sites. According to histopathology results, statistically no significant difference was found between the SUV_max measurements of malignant and benign cases (p>0.05) but the average SUV_max measurements of malignant cases were found to be significantly higher than lower + high-grade cases (p<0.05) and hyperplastic polyp cases (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

In conclusion, any unexpected focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies is suspicious for malignancy and should be clarified by colonoscopy. The intensity of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake does not preclude the application of colonoscopy and histopathological verification of the lesion if there is any.

Assessment of incidental focal colorectal uptake by analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters

BACKGROUND

Colon and rectal cancers are among the top five cancers worldwide in terms of their incidence and mortality rates. As the treatment options for cure include surgery even in specific advanced-stage cases, the early detection of lesions is important for applying active treatment methods. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an established imaging study for many types of cancers; however, physiologic uptake in the gastrointestinal tract is a frequent finding and may interfere with lesion identification. Nevertheless, as unexpectedly observed focal colorectal F-18 FDG uptake may harbor malignant lesions, further examination must not be avoided.

AIM

To assess the clinical implications of unexpected focal colorectal F-18 FDG uptake by analyzing FDG PET parameters.

METHODS

A total of 15143 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to identify incidentally observed focal colorectal FDG uptake. Finally, 83 regions showing focal colorectal FDG uptake with final histopathological reports from 80 patients (45 men and 35 women with mean ages of 66.9 ± 10.7 years and 63.7 ± 15.3 years, respectively) were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Each focal hypermetabolic colorectal region was classified as malignant, premalignant, or benign according to the histopathological report. PET parameters such as maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), mean SUV of the metabolic tumor volume (mSUVmtv), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured or calculated for the corresponding hypermetabolic regions. Parametric and non-parametric statistical comparisons of these parameters were performed among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to identify cut-off values.

RESULTS

The detection rate of incidental focal colorectal uptake was 0.53% (80/15,143). Of the 83 regions with unexpected focal colorectal hypermetabolism, 28.9% (24/83) were malignant, 32.5% (27/83) were premalignant, and 38.6% (32/83) were benign. Overall, 61.4% of the regions had malignant or premalignant lesions. SUVmax, SUVpeak, and mSUVmtv differentiated malignant and/or premalignant lesions from benign lesions with statistical significance (P < 0.05). mSUVmtv3.5 differentiated malignant from benign lesions, with the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792 and a cut-off of 4.9. SUVmax showed the largest AUC of 0.758 with a cut-off value of 7.5 for distinguishing between premalignant and benign lesions. Overall, SUVmax with a cut-off value of 7.6 (AUC: 0.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.668-0.872; sensitivity, 0.686; specificity, 0.688) was a superior parameter for distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions or physiologic uptake. No parameters differentiated malignant from premalignant lesions. Moderate or weak positive correlations were observed between the long diameter of the malignant lesions and PET parameters such as SUVpeak and some mSUVmtv.

CONCLUSION

Approximately two-thirds (61.4%) of incidental focal hypermetabolic colorectal regions were malignant/premalignant lesions, for which SUVmax was an independent diagnostic parameter. Unexpected suspicious focal colorectal FDG uptake should not be avoided and consideration for further evaluation is strongly recommended not to miss the two-thirds.

Correlation between incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT and colonoscopic and histopathological results

OBJECTIVE AND AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between incidental focal colorectal foci on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) with colonoscopic and histopathological results. The secondary aim was to determine to what extent these findings led to a change in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed among 5850 patients who had an FDG-PT/CT scan from July 2015 to July 2018. Among these patients, we identified patients with a PET/CT description of incidental colorectal FDG uptake, and a colonoscopy within 90 days from the PET/CT scan. PET/CT findings were compared with colonoscopy-detected lesions and eventually histopathology on a per-lesion analysis and a per-person analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included in the study. A total of 180 foci of colorectal FDG uptake were detected on FDG-PET/CT. Of these, 86 foci corresponded to advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN), positive predictive value (PPV) 47.8%; 95% CI: 40.5-55.1%). On a per-patient analysis 81 patients had a least one ACRN at colonoscopy (PPV 55.9%; 95% CI: 47.6-63.8), this group included 20 patients (13.8%) diagnosed with cancer. There was a small positive correlation between focal FDG-uptake and the finding of ACRN at the same colonic segment at colonoscopy, which was statistically significant, rho = 0.2565, p = .002. The findings changed patient management in 67 (46.2%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT is associated with a high risk of ACRN and is affecting subsequent patient management. Further evaluation with colonoscopy is recommended when the patient is considered suitable for further treatment.

Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area

OBJECTIVES

Serial changes of focal uptake in whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were assessed and compared with those in early-delayed imaging to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake in the colorectal area, based on the change in uptake shape.

METHODS

In 60 patients with at least 1 pathologically diagnosed colorectal cancer or adenoma, a serial 3 min dynamic whole-body PET/computed tomography imaging was performed four times around 60 min after the administration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to create a conventional (early) image by summation. Delayed imaging was performed separately at 110 min after FDG administration. High focal uptake lesions in the colorectal area were visually assessed as "changed" or "unchanged" on serial dynamic imaging and early-delayed imaging, based on the alteration in uptake shape over time. These criteria on the images were used to differentiate pathological uptake from physiological uptake.

RESULTS

In this study, 334 lesions with high focal FDG uptake were observed. Among 73 histologically proven pathological FDG uptakes, no change was observed in 69 on serial dynamic imaging and 72 on early-delayed imaging (sensitivity of 95 vs. 99%, respectively; ns). In contrast, out of 261 physiological FDG uptakes, a change in uptake shape was seen in 159 on dynamic PET imaging and 66 on early-delayed imaging (specificity of 61 vs. 25%, respectively; p < 0.01). High and similar negative predictive values for identifying pathological uptake were obtained by both methods (98 vs 99%, respectively). Thus, the overall accuracy for differentiating pathological from physiological FDG uptake based on change in uptake shape tended to be higher on serial dynamic imaging (68%) than on early-delayed imaging (41%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic whole-body FDG imaging enables differentiation of pathological uptake from physiological uptake based on the serial changes in uptake shape in the colorectal area. It may provide greater diagnostic value than early-delayed PET imaging. Thus, this technique holds a promise for minimizing the need for delayed imaging.

Clinically significant findings in patients with focal incidental colorectal abnormalities on positron emission tomography-CT scans

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical significance of focal incidentally detected colorectal abnormalities on ¹⁸ F- Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (FDG) PET-CT scans.

METHODS

Retrospective audit of PET-CT scans performed at our institution between 2009 and 2014. Demographic and clinical details were retrieved from electronic patient records. An advanced adenoma was defined as: ≥1 cm in size, tubullo-villous histology, or displaying high grade dysplasia. A high-risk lesion (HRL) was defined as an advanced adenoma or colorectal cancer (CRC).

RESULTS

Of the 1911 PET-CT eligible scans, focal incidental colorectal FDG uptake was detected in 99 (5.2%) patients. Colonoscopy was undertaken in 43 (43.4%) patients and 45 FDG-avid sites were evaluated. The commonest site of abnormal FDG uptake was the rectosigmoid region, with 34 (75.6%) of the 45 foci being located in this area. Overall, 23 (53.5%) of these patients had clinically significant pathology. Of the 45 focal PET-CT abnormalities evaluated, 17 (37.8%) were adenomas, of which 11 (24.4%) were advanced adenomas, and six (13.3%) were cancers, with a total of 17 (37.8%) HRLs. Five of the six patients with CRC underwent surgical resection, whilst one had endoscopic resection. The overall survival for the entire cohort was 18 months (range 1-72 months) with those that underwent colonoscopy having higher overall survival compared to those that did not (38 vs. 13.5 months).

CONCLUSION

Incidental colorectal abnormalities on PET-CT scans are often clinically significant. However, careful selection for colonoscopy is important due to the poor survival in these patients related to the underlying primary malignancy.

Implication of FDG-PET/CT without synchronous colonic lesion in patients with stenotic left-sided colorectal cancer

Although 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is useful for detecting synchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) in stenotic CRC, long-term outcomes of patients without synchronous FDG-avid lesions are not well reported. We investigated postoperative colonoscopy results in patients with left-sided stenosing CRC without synchronous FDG-avid lesions. In this retrospective review, 754 patients with left-sided CRC without synchronous FDG-avid lesions on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT were divided into two groups based on the completeness of preoperative colonoscopy. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Results of postoperative colonoscopy were compared in both the unmatched and matched cohorts. At 1 and 5 years after surgery, the cumulative risk of advanced adenoma (AA) or carcinoma (CA) in all patients, risk of CA, and additional surgical risk were 1.8% and 10.1%, 0.1% and 0.4%, and 0% and 0.5%, respectively. In both cohorts, the AA risk was significantly higher in the incomplete colonoscopy group. However, the risk of CA showed no between-group difference in the matched cohort. Additional surgical risk did not differ between the two groups. Thus, the finding of negative FDG-avid lesions in the proximal colon in addition to the target CRC ensures the absence of additional lesions warranting surgical plan changes.

Rectal operative bed: ?tumor? post-management changes … positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can answer

Background

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy that continues to have a highly variable outcome. Local pelvic recurrence following surgery is usually leading to incurable disease. Surgical resection with stage-appropriate combined-modality therapy is the mainstay in the treatment of rectal cancer. A difficulty has been reported in distinguishing the benign post-management findings from tumor recurrence. By adding the metabolic changes to the post-operative morphologic changes, combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) may offer clinically useful addition in operative bed evaluation.

Results

The study included 30 patients, 17 males (56.6%) and 13 females (43.3%). Suspicious operative bed findings included pre-sacral soft tissue density noted in 20 patients (66%), anastomotic site mural thickening in five patients (16.6%), and post-operative loco-regional nodes in five patients (16.6%). Moreover, pre-sacral soft tissue focal avid uptake was noted in 17 patients (17/20, 85%), and no uptake noted in three patients (3/20, 15%). Anastomotic site mural thickening was seen in five patients with positive uptake noted in three patients (3/5, 60%), and no uptake seen in two patients (2/5, 40%). Loco-regional nodes were seen in five patients with positive uptake in five patients. The most accurate SUV max cut-off value among studied cases was 3.5. Confirmation of PET/CT results was done by histopathological assessment in ten patients (33.3%) and by follow up after 6 months in 20 patients (66.6%) with recurrence noted in 15 patients (75%) and normal post-operative findings noted in five patients (25%).

Conclusion

PET/CT study is an effective tool for evaluation of suspicious colorectal oncologic operative bed findings noted in the routine CT studies. PET/CT fusion images affect the clinical management by guiding further procedures (surgery and radiation therapy).

Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of morphological information derived from contrast-enhanced CT in the characterization of incidental focal colonic uptake in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients (female: n = 53, male: n = 72) that underwent colonoscopy secondary to contrast-enhanced, full-dose PET/CT without special bowel preparation were included in this retrospective study. PET/CT examinations were assessed for focal colonic tracer uptake in comparison with the background. Focal tracer uptake was correlated with morphological changes of the colonic wall in the contrast-enhanced CT images. Colonoscopy reports were evaluated for benign, inflammatory, polypoid, precancerous, and cancerous lesions verified by histopathology, serving as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of therapeutic relevant findings were calculated for (a) sole focal tracer uptake and (b) focal tracer uptake with correlating CT findings in contrast-enhanced CT.

RESULTS

In 38.4% (48/125) of the patients, a focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed within 67 lesions. Malignant lesions were endoscopically and histopathologically diagnosed in eleven patients, and nine of these were detected by focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. A total of 34 lesions with impact on short- or long-term patient management (either being pre- or malignant) were detected. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for sole ¹⁸F-FDG uptake for this combined group were 54%, 69%, 29%, 85%, and 65%. Corresponding results for focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake with correlating CT findings were 38%, 90%, 50%, 86%, and 80%. This resulted in a statistically significant difference for diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.0001) CONCLUSION: By analyzing additional morphological changes in contrast-enhanced CT imaging, the specificity of focal colonic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake for precancerous and cancerous lesions can be increased but leads to a considerate loss of sensitivity. Therefore, every focal colonic uptake should be followed up by colonoscopy.

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to explore the role of the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database, from the earliest available date of indexing through April 30, 2018, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Across 8 studies (1451 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET/CT was 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.90) without heterogeneity (χ² = 10.84, p = 0.37) and a pooled specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89) with heterogeneity (χ² = 130.1, p = 0.00). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.2 (95% CI 3.6-7.4) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.12-0.22). The pooled DOR was 32 (95% CI 20-51).

CONCLUSION

F-18 FDG PET/CT demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake. At present, the literature regarding the use of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake remains still limited; thus, further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of incidental colorectal focal FDG uptake.

Clinical-endoscopic relevance of incidental colorectal lesions detected by PET-CT

AIM

to determine the proportion of incidental colon lesions detected by PET-CT and their correlation with the endoscopic and histological findings. In addition, to determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) that can discriminate between benign and malignant lesions in our series of cases.

METHODS

this was a retrospective study of 3,000 patients evaluated by PET-CT for staging or response to treatment of primary neoplasms, between 2011 and 2015. Patients with incidental uptake in the colon were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included an incomplete, poorly prepared or abandoned colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease and treatment with metformin.

RESULTS

the study cohort comprised 71 patients evaluated by PET-CT and subsequently analyzed by endoscopy; 69% were male with a mean age of 65.77 ± 11.2. The rate of incidental colon lesions found by PET-CT was 1.73%, with 52 incidental colonic uptakes reported in 50 patients. The location of the uptake was the rectum (19.23%), sigmoid colon (34.62%), descending colon (13.46%), transverse colon (1.9%), ascending colon (19.23%), cecum (9.62%) and ileocolic anastomosis (1.92%). Thirty-five pathological colonoscopies (71.15%) were identified: the findings included five neoplasms (13.51%), two inflammatory lesions (5.4%) and 30 adenomatous polyps (81.1%). Significant differences were found between neoplastic SUVmax (11.7 g/ml; p = 0.03) and polyps (9.26 g/ml; p = 0.04) in relation to inflammatory lesions and normal endoscopies (6.05 g/ml). There were no differences in terms of the size of the polyps, nor the presence or absence of high grade dysplasia (p = 0.12 and 0.33). Both PET-CT and endoscopy proved consistent for locating lesions (k 0.90; CI 95% 0.86-0.93).

CONCLUSION

there is a good correlation between the findings identified by PET-CT and the endoscopic study. In our study, a SUVmax > 11 g/ml suggests a malignant pathology, which aids the prioritization of an endoscopic study.

Incidental detection of colorectal lesions by FDG PET/CT scans in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Increased use of PET/CT scans in oncology patients has raised detection of Colorectal incidentalomas (CIs). The frequency and diagnostic outcomes of identifying these lesions in melanoma patients have not previously been studied. This studies primary objective was to determine the prevalence of CIs found on PET/CT scans in melanoma patients. The secondary objectives were to correlate the PET/CT findings with the pathology found at colonoscopy, and identify which patients were referred for colonoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients identified from the prospectively collected research database of Melanoma Institute Australia. 2509 patients with melanoma underwent PET/CT scans between 2001 and 2013. The prevalence of CIs, the correlation of lesions, and the survival of patients who underwent colonoscopy versus patients who did not were analyzed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CIs in melanoma patients who had PET/CT scans was 3.2%. Forty-five of the 81 (56%) patients with CIs underwent colonoscopy. Of these, premalignant or malignant disease was found in 58%. Patients with previous metastatic melanoma were significantly less likely to be referred for colonoscopy. Patients undergoing colonoscopy had significantly better survival, as did those without previous distant metastases before the CIs were found, and those without any metastases at the time the CIs were found. These factors were not significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of incidental colorectal lesions identified on PET/CT scans in melanoma patients was found to be equivalent to that in the general cancer population. Patients undergoing colonoscopy had better survival than those who did not.

Incidental colorectal focal 18 F-FDG uptake: a novel indication for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 The relevance of incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake is debatable. All patients who were referred for colonoscopy because of incidental colonic focal FDG uptake were included in this retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 PET/CT imaging characteristics were reviewed by a nuclear physician who was blinded to endoscopic and histopathological findings to determine the location of FDG uptake sites and to measure the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Endoscopic findings were categorized as malignant lesions (ML), high-risk polyps (HRP), low-risk polyps (LRP) or other non-neoplastic lesions (NNL).

RESULTS

 Seventy patients with 84 foci of FDG uptake were included. The proportions of true-positive (lesions found at colonoscopy at the same location) and false-positive (no lesion at colonoscopy) PET/CT findings were 65.5 % (n = 55) and 34.5 % (n = 29). Median SUVmax values did not differ between true-positive and false-positive findings ( P  = 0.27). Median MV30 values differed significantly between true-positive (5.5 cm ³ , [3.3 - 10.9 cm ³ ]) and false-positive (9.7 cm ³ , [5.2 - 40.8 cm ³ ]) findings ( P  = 0.015). Among the 55 true-positive FDG uptake sites, there were 14 (25.5 %) malignant lesions, 30 (54.5 %) HRP, 4 (7.3 %) LRP, and 7 (12.7 %) NNL. Median MV30 values differed significantly between advanced neoplasia (5.0 cm ³ , [2.9 - 9.7 cm ³ ]) and other endoscopic findings (9.4 cm ³ , [5.2 - 39.8 cm ³ ]) ( P  = 0.001); the AUROC was 0.71. By per-colonic segment analysis, the distribution of true-positive, false-negative, false-positive, and true-negative FDG PET/CT findings was as follows: 21.5 %, 14.2 %, 11.5 %, and 52.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Our study demonstrates that follow-up complete colonoscopy is mandatory in all patients with incidental colorectal focal ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT uptake.

Can positron emission tomography detect colorectal adenomas and cancers?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) is effective and less invasive than other modalities used to diagnose tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the detectability of adenomas and CRCs, especially in the early stages, is unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the records of 2323 consecutive eligible patients who underwent both a total colonoscopy (TCS) and PET between October 2002 and September 2012 at a tertiary cancer center. The PET findings were verified by TCS performed independently within 1 year. Target lesions were defined as CRCs and adenomas that were 6 mm or larger in size.

RESULTS

Total colonoscopy detected 532 target lesions ≥ 6 mm in size: 56 T2-T4 CRCs, 39 T1 CRCs, 223 advanced adenomas, and 214 low-grade adenomas. Of the 532 lesions, 216 (40.6%) were PET positive. Of the 369 cases with positive uptakes, PET detected target lesions in the matched segments for 58.5% (216/369). Sensitivity of PET to T2-T4 CRCs, T1 CRCs, advanced adenomas, and low-grade adenomas was 92.9%, 79.5%, 50.7%, and 9.3%, respectively. PET could detect 76.5% (13/17) of T1 CRCs whose size is 10 to 19 mm and 85.0% (17/20) of T1 CRCs equal or larger than 20 mm. The multivariate analysis excluding T2-T4 CRCs showed malignant histology, larger size, protruded lesions, villous histology, and lesions in distal colon were significant factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of PET for detecting T2-T4 and even T1 cancers are promising. However, sensitivity of PET to adenomas, even advanced adenomas, is limited.

Limited Identification of Dual-time-point Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms

Objective We investigated whether dual-time-point 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could improve the positive predictive value for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms (cancer, adenoma ≥10 mm or adenoma with high-grade dysplasia). Methods We retrospectively searched for consecutive patients with a known primary cancer, who had a colonic ¹⁸FDG uptake incidentally found by PET/CT, followed by colonoscopy between January 2013 and August 2014. The clinical characteristics including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were compared between advanced colorectal neoplasms and non-advanced lesions. Results Forty-eight patients had 51 foci with an incidental focal colorectal uptake of ¹⁸FDG. Among these 51 foci, 28 foci were judged as being advanced neoplasms, whereas 23 foci identified as non-advanced lesions. Four cases were missed by PET/CT: two laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) with intramucosal cancer and two severe adenomas (<10 mm). The positive predictive value for the detection of advanced neoplasms was 55%. The per-spot performance of PET/CT showed that SUVmax was significantly higher in advanced neoplasms than in non-advanced lesions for the early-phase (10.1±4.9 vs. 6.5±3.2, p=0.029) and the delayed-phase (12.0±6.0 vs. 7.4±4.0, p=0.022). However, more importantly, there was a significant overlap of the SUVmax and no significant difference was found in the retention index (19.2±20.1 vs. 16.6±29.4, p=0.767). Conclusion Dual-time-point PET/CT was found to have limited impact for identifying advanced colorectal neoplasms in spite of its high sensitivity and it might therefore not be able to identify either LSTs or small advanced neoplasms.

Sensitivity of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for advanced colorectal neoplasms: a large-scale analysis of 7505 asymptomatic screening individuals

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for advanced colorectal neoplasms among healthy subjects is not yet fully understood. The present study aimed to clarify the sensitivity by analyzing large-scale data from an asymptomatic screening population.

METHODS

A total of 7505 asymptomatic screenees who underwent both FDG-PET and colonoscopy at our Cancer Screening Division between February 2004 and March 2013 were analyzed. FDG-PET and colonoscopy were performed on consecutive days, and each examination was interpreted in a blinded fashion. The results of the two examinations were compared for each of the divided six colonic segments, with those from colonoscopy being set as the reference. The relationships between the sensitivity of FDG-PET and clinicopathological features of advanced neoplasms were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-one advanced neoplasms, including 24 invasive cancers, were detected in 262 individuals. Thirteen advanced neoplasms (advanced adenomas) were excluded from the analysis because of the coexistence of lesions in the same colonic segment. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET for advanced neoplasms were 16.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 12.7-21.8 %], 99.3 % (95 % CI 99.2-99.4 %), 13.5 % (95 % CI 10.1-17.6 %), and 99.4 % (95 % CI 99.3-99.5 %), respectively. The sensitivity was lower for lesions with less advanced histological grade, of smaller size, and flat-type morphology, and for those located in the proximal part of the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET is believed to be difficult to use as a primary screening tool in population-based colorectal cancer screening because of its low sensitivity for advanced neoplasms. Even when it is used in opportunistic cancer screening, the limit of its sensitivity should be considered.

What approach should we take for the incidental finding of increased 18F-FDG uptake foci in the colon on PET/CT?

INTRODUCTION

F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/CT represents an imaging modality that is gaining increasingly more prominence in screening, staging, and therapeutic monitoring of malignant diseases. An incidental focus of uptake in different regions of the body is not an uncommon finding during PET/CT imaging. Patients with incidental gastrointestinal tract findings comprise ∼3% of the overall patient group. The aim of the current study was to provide contributory information in relation to the answer on the most appropriate approach in cases with incidental colonic F-FDG uptake.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective examination was performed on PET/CT results of 5258 patients. Of these, 152 were recommended to undergo colonoscopy because of the presence of suspicious foci and 31 underwent colonoscopy within 60 days with biopsy from all visible lesions. These dates were also examined.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients undergoing colonoscopy with a suspicion of malignancy, five (20.83%) had no pathological findings. Of the 19 (79.17%) cases with a pathological finding in endoscopy, histopathology showed a benign lesion in five (20.83%), premalignant lesion in seven (29.17%), and a malignant lesion in seven (29.17%). Among seven patients undergoing colonoscopy because of a suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease, five were free of pathological signs and two patients with pathological endoscopy findings had nonspecific inflammation as documented by histopathological examination.

CONCLUSION

Colonoscopic and histopathological examination of the increased foci of colonic F-FDG uptake incidentally detected at PET/CT seems to be a plausible approach.

Correlation of Ki-67 proliferation index and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in colorectal incidental lesions detected by positron emission tomography-computed tomography

BACKGROUND/AIM

To investigate whether focal high maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) determined by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) imaging is correlated with proliferation index in the colorectal region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SUVmax values of 31 colorectal neoplasms that were incidentally detected during PET-CT examination were compared to dysplasia degree, histopathologic diagnosis, and immunohistochemical expression of the Ki-67 proliferation marker.

RESULTS

Statistically significant correlations were found between SUVmax and Ki-67 proliferation index, dysplasia degree, and histopathologic diagnosis. Median SUVmax value was found to be significantly higher in high-risk lesions than low-risk lesions.

CONCLUSION

The Ki-67 proliferation index is an indicator of SUVmax in colorectal tract. SUVmax values can predict malignancy and prognosis in this region. Colonoscopy and biopsy should always be performed whenever a focal high FDG uptake is determined incidentally in a patient.

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting

BACKGROUND

Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT may be associated with a malignancy and can be quantified. This provides the basis for an automatic trigger threshold above which cases are flagged for colonoscopic evaluation and below which for individual assessment.

PURPOSE

To determine the lowest maximum standard uptake (SUVmax) in colorectal cancer that could be used as a threshold to trigger endoscopic evaluation and to evaluate whether the SUVmax needs to be further normalised to a priori known extrinsic factors.

METHODS

The SUVmax was measured in 54 colorectal carcinomas and correlated with gender, age, blood glucose level, injected activity, body mass index and time to scan using t test or correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman, according to distribution).

RESULTS

There was no correlation between SUVmax and any of the extrinsic factors mentioned above. The lowest SUVmax value was 5 [mean ± SD (range): 11.1 ± 4.8 (5.0-24.6)].

CONCLUSION

In contrast to most other screening techniques, semi-automation in colorectal screening seems possible with PET/CT. This opens the door for further study into the feasibility of automated screening. Independent from extrinsic factors, an SUVmax ≥5.0 in a focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT should automatically trigger for endoscopic evaluation, if not contraindicated. Cases with SUVmax <5 should be assessed individually before referral for endoscopy. Thus, more interpretation time could be spent on those cases with a lower uptake and more ambiguous diagnosis.

The preoperative SUVmax for (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer

Background

The study was to investigate whether ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake, analyzed by positron emission tomography (PET), can be used preoperatively to predict survival in Chinese patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Methods

A prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database was retrospectively reviewed between June 2009 and December 2011. All included patients had been newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (of various stages) and evaluated by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) within the 2 weeks preceding surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine whether the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and various clinicopathological and immunohistochemical factors were correlated with survival. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were used to explore whether SUVmax could predict survival in these patients.

Results

A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the study (mean age, 59.26 ± 12.66 years; 66.35 % males), with 77 surviving to the end of follow-up (average 60 months). Univariate analysis indicated that tumor size, TNM stage, nodal metastasis, the ratio of metastasized nodes to retrieved nodes, cyclin D1 immunostaining and SUVmax correlated with survival (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only TNM stage and SUVmax were associated with survival (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis determined the optimal SUVmax cutoff for predicting survival to be 11.85 (sensitivity, 73.3 %; specificity, 75.3 %). Survival was significantly longer in patients with preoperative SUVmax ≤11.85 (P < 0.001, log-rank test).

Conclusions

SUVmax, measured by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, provides a useful preoperative prognostic factor for patients with colorectal cancer.

Incidental gastrointestinal 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake associated with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is increasingly used for the initial staging and restaging of lung cancer. Incidental gastrointestinal findings are often observed on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The objective of this study was to assess incidental 18F-FDG uptake by the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty consecutive 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations performed for lung cancer over a 3-year period were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of incidental FDG uptake in the GIT. The charts of patients with positive FDG uptake were then reviewed and analysed to determine the GIT uptake sites, the standardized uptake value (SUV) max and the final clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (52/230, 23%) demonstrated incidental FDG uptake in the GIT. Thirty-three patients (63.5%) had diffuse uptake (oesophagus, n = 2, colon, n = 31) and 19 patients (36.5%) had focal uptake (oesophagus, n = 1, small bowel, n = 1, ascending colon, n = 5, descending colon, n = 4, sigmoid, n = 4, rectum, n = 3, and anal margin, n = 1). Twelve of the 52 patients with GIT uptake were further investigated, revealing, a diagnosis of malignancy in 4 patients with focal FDG uptake. No significant differences in mean SUVmax were observed between patients with malignant and benign GIT diseases.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a high incidence of FDG uptake in the GIT associated with lung cancer. Focal GIT uptake was frequently associated with malignant disease. These results suggest that further GIT investigations should be performed in patients with focal GIT uptake.

Who should undergo a colonoscopy among patients with incidental colon uptake on PET-CT?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimal cut-off of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) for the detection of colorectal neoplasms and to suggest those for whom further colonoscopy is recommended among patients with incidental colonic uptake on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 306 patients who underwent colonoscopy within 3 months of receiving PET-CT between January and December 2009, measurements of the per-patient and per-lesion diagnostic performance of PET-CT for the detection of colonic neoplasms were obtained. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the SUVmax that provided a high probability of diagnosing malignancy and high-grade dysplasia.

RESULTS

The per-patient and per-lesion PET-CT detection sensitivities for malignancies were 93.3% (28/30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 76.5% to 98.9%) and 93.5% (29/31, 95% CI 77.2% to 98.9%), respectively; the sensitivities for high-grade dysplasia were both 90.0% (9/10; 95% CI 54.1% to 99.5%). As a criterion to specifically detect both malignancy and high-grade dysplasia on focal uptake, a SUVmax greater than 2.5 yielded a 92.3% per-lesion sensitivity and a 42.9% per-lesion positive predictive value (PPV). In the ROC curve analysis, a cut-off value of SUVmax = 5.8 was established, at which the sensitivity, PPV and positive likelihood ratio for diagnosing malignancy and high-grade dysplasia were 71.8% (28/39; 95% CI 54.9% to 84.5%), 84.8% (28/33; 95% CI 67.3% to 94.3%) and 6.9, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal cut-off value to identify a malignancy or high-grade dysplasia was SUVmax = 5.8. However, to avoid missing a malignancy or high-grade dysplasia, a colonoscopy should be performed above a SUVmax = 2.5.

Colonoscopic Findings in Patients With Incidental Colonic Focal FDG Uptake

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of FDG-avid and non-FDG-avid lesions detected at colonoscopy in patients presenting with incidental focal colonic FDG uptake at PET/CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 9073 patients who underwent PET/CT over a 4-year period, 82 patients without a history of colonic disease had focal colonic FDG uptake and underwent colonoscopy. In consensus, a radiologist and a nuclear physician read images from these PET/CT examinations. They recorded the location of focal FDG uptake in the colon and associated CT abnormalities and measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Readings were performed twice--first without and second with knowledge of lesion location at colonoscopy. The final diagnosis was based on colonoscopic findings and histopathologic results categorized into benign, premalignant, or malignant.

RESULTS

One hundred seven foci of colonic FDG uptake at PET/CT and 150 lesions at colonoscopy were detected. Among 107 foci of FDG uptake, 65 (61%) corresponded to a lesion at colonoscopy (true-positive findings), and 42 (39%) did not (false-positive findings). Among 150 lesions found at colonoscopy, 85 (57%) were not FDG avid (false-negative findings). The MV of true-positive findings was lower than that of false-positive findings (4.0 ± 0.4 cm(3) vs 6.2 ± 0.7 cm(3); p = 0.006), but SUVmax did not differ (7.4 ± 0.5 vs 7.7 ± 0.5; p = 0.649). Considering the histopathologic categories of the lesions and the false-positive findings, there was no difference in SUVmax (p = 0.103), but MV was lower in premalignant lesions than in false-positive findings (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Focal colonic FDG uptake may indicate the presence of a benign, pre-malignant, or malignant lesion. Subsequent colonoscopy should not be restricted to the colonic site of FDG uptake.

Incidence and risk factors for colorectal neoplasia in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

AIM

Colorectal adenoma and cancer are not regarded as being associated with primary oral cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether screening colonoscopy should be performed for patients with oral cancer in addition to the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening that is now routinely performed.

METHOD

Between 2007 and 2013, 162 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled at Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, and 136 individuals were assigned to colonoscopic surveillance. Advanced neoplasia was defined as an adenoma ≥ 10 mm, adenoma with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia regardless of size and invasive cancer. Associations between advanced neoplasia and clinical factors, including age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption and oral cancer site and staging were determined.

RESULTS

Advanced neoplasia, including five invasive cancers, was identified in 32 (23.5%) patients. An age- and sex-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed that smoking (Brinkmann index > 400; OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.28-8.18), alcohol consumption (lifetime pure ethanol consumption > 600 l; OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.18-6.79) and a diagnosis of cancer of the floor of the mouth (OR = 7.97, 95% CI = 2.49-25.46) were independent risk factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia is unexpectedly high in patients with oral cancer. It should be recognized as a second primary tumour of oral cancer. Screening of oral cancer patients by colonoscopy should be routine practice, particularly among smokers and patients with a high intake of alcohol and cancer of the floor of the mouth.

Prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidental uptake detected by (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT: a meta-analysis

Background

The aim of the study was to meta-analyze published data about prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidentalomas (FCIs) detected by Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT).

Methods

A comprehensive computer literature search of studies published through July 31^st 2012 regarding FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT was performed. Pooled prevalence of patients with FCIs and risk of malignant or premalignant FCIs after colonoscopy or histopathology verification were calculated. Furthermore, separate calculations for geographic areas were performed. Finally, average standardized uptake values (SUV) in malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs were reported.

Results

Thirty-two studies comprising 89,061 patients evaluated by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT were included. The pooled prevalence of FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.6–4.7%). Overall, 1,044 FCIs detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT underwent colonoscopy or histopathology evaluation. Pooled risk of malignant or premalignant lesions was 68% (95% CI: 60–75%). Risk of malignant and premalignant FCIs in Asia-Oceania was lower compared to that of Europe and America. A significant overlap in average SUV was found between malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs.

Conclusions

FCIs are observed in a not negligible number of patients who undergo ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT studies with a high risk of malignant or premalignant lesions. SUV is not reliable as a tool to differentiate between malignant, premalignant and benign FCIs. Further investigation is warranted whenever FCIs are detected by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET or PET/CT.

Use of FDG/PET CT to diagnose malignancy as the cause of mucocele of the appendix

Mucocele of the appendix is an uncommon condition characterized by luminal distension and accumulation of a mucoid material. Occasionally, it can be caused due to malignancy like cystadenocarcinoma, and the preoperative diagnosis of which is very rare. We report a case of a 64-year-old lady presenting with intermittent abdominal pain diagnosed on ultrasonography as a mucocele where preoperative (18)F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (FDG PET/CT) findings raised a strong suspicion of malignancy. FDG PET/CT findings brought about a change in therapeutic plan, and the patient was considered for a more extensive surgical resection. The final histopathology revealed cystadenocarcinoma as the cause of appendicular mucocele, a finding hitherto undescribed on FDG PET/CT.

Correlation between incidental FDG PET/CT colorectal observations and endoscopic and histopathological results

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is used in the imaging workup of various malignancies. Incidental gastrointestinal observations on FDG PET/CT may be of clinical significance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate endoscopic and histopathological observations in patients referred for colonoscopy due to incidental FDG colonic uptake on a PET/CT study. Fifty-six patients with incidental colonic findings on FDG PET/CT underwent colonoscopy. Normal colonoscopies were observed in 63% of the patients. In 37% of the colonoscopies, we identified an endoscopic observation, including 67% with benign adenomatous polyps, 3% with hyperplastic polyps, 20% with advanced histological lesions and 10% with a malignancy.

Is there any additional benefit of contrast-enhanced CT as part of routine PET/CT protocols for the differentiation of suspicious incidental gastrointestinal 2-deoxy-(18)F-FDG uptake?

Objective

Suspicious incidental gastrointestinal FDG uptake during positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examinations can be caused by different diseases, including malignancies. However, differentiation with PET alone is difficult. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of PET alone, contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT), and low-dose CT (ldCT) in routine PET/CT protocols for differentiation of incidental gastrointestinal lesions.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients with incidental gastrointestinal lesions who underwent a routine PET/CT protocol with ldCT and ceCT were retrospectively analysed. The PET lesions were evaluated regarding their FDG uptake patterns and the standard uptake value. The anatomical correlates in both CT protocols were compared in regard to the correct lesion classification with the reference standard endoscopy.

Results

Sixty-two lesions were found in 60 patients (17 malignant, 10 premalignant, 5 benign, 13 inflammatory, 17 physiological). The differentiation of the FDG uptake patterns did not enable reliable lesion classification. The positive predictive value for pathology was 0.81 for ceCT in PET/CT and 0.70 for ldCT. Malignancies were detected in 100% of the patients by ceCT vs. 29.4% by ldCT. The false negative rate of ceCT for all pathologies was 31.1%, vs. 68.9% for ldCT. False positive results (17/62) could not be excluded sufficiently by either CT protocol.

Conclusion

PET/ceCT protocols provide additional benefit especially in detecting gastrointestinal malignancies as a cause of suspicious incidental gastrointestinal FDG uptake. However, since follow-up endoscopy cannot be forgone due to the considerable false negative rate even with ceCT, the addition of ceCT to a routine PET/ldCT protocol cannot be recommended for this purpose.

Etiology and significance of incidentally detected focal colonic uptake on FDG PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Incidental colonic uptake of 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) is not an infrequent finding encountered during whole body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Almost all studies on this topic are in Western populations, which have a markedly different epidemiological profile for colorectal premalignant and malignant conditions as compared to that of the Indian subcontinent.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the etiology of incidentally detected focal FDG uptake in the colon by comparing it with colonoscopy and histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients who underwent FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) at our institution for a 2½-year period from January 2009 to July 2011 were reviewed. There were 32 out of 9000 (0.35%) patients whose PET/CT reports mentioned incidental focal colonic FDG uptake, of which 24 patients subsequently underwent colonoscopy. Lesions which appeared neoplastic on colonoscopy were confirmed with histopathology obtained after biopsy or surgery. Colonoscopy and pathology findings were considered as gold standard.

RESULTS

Among the 24 patients who underwent a colonoscopy, 3 patients had normal findings (12.5%). A positive colonoscopy was noted in 21 patients (87.5%) with the lesion coinciding with the location described in the PET/CT report. Adenomatous polyps were detected in 12 patients (37.5%), whereas in 8 patients (25%) malignant lesions were confirmed [adenocarcinoma n = 5, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) n = 2, malignant melanoma n = 1]. In one patient, colonic uptake was diagnosed as inflammatory. The mean standardized uptake valuemax (SUVmax) for the 12 premalignant lesions was 16.9 ± 9.6 (range 7.5-37.4) and the mean SUVmax for the 8 malignant lesions was 12.9 ± 5.5 (range 6.7-21.6). The difference in SUVmax between the premalignant adenomatous polyps and the malignant lesions was not statistically significant (P = 0.316).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that a significant proportion of patients (62.5%, 20/32) showing an incidental focal FDG uptake will harbor premalignant (adenomatous polyps) or malignant lesions, and further evaluation with colonoscopy and biopsy is warranted in such cases.

Incidental colonic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: do we need colonoscopy for patients with focal uptake confined to the left-sided colon?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although access to [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography and computed axial tomography (PET/CT) for patients with malignancy has increased, little information is available on the suitability of PET/CT for diagnosis of advanced colonic neoplasms in oncology patients and on the clinical significance of incidental 18F-FDG focal uptake confined to the left-sided colon.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT followed, within 90 days, by colonoscopy were identified. Case-control analysis was undertaken to determine whether focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon was associated with advanced neoplasms in the right-sided colon.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-five patients with colonic 18F-FDG uptake and 561 without colonic (18)F-FDG uptake were identified. Of the 195 patients with focal colonic 18F-FDG activity, 103 patients (52.8%) had 145 advanced colonic neoplasms, including 58 colon cancers and 11 metastatic cancers. In the detection of advanced colonic neoplasms, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/CT were 54.4, 82.4, 46.9, and 86.3%, respectively. Overall accuracy was 76.2%. Ten (8.0%) of the 125 patients with focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon had three colon cancers and seven advanced adenomas in the right-sided colon. Case-control analysis revealed that focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon was associated with an advanced neoplasms in the right-sided colon (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.12-8.13; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic focal (18)F-FDG uptake by oncology patients warrants endoscopic verification. Complete colon evaluation by colonoscopy is required, even for patients with focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon.

Clinical significance of incidental colonic 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We assessed the ability of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) to detect synchronous colonic pathology and determined the significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) activity in the colon of gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 239 gastric cancer patients who underwent PET/CT and colonoscopy preoperatively were included. FDG uptake patterns on PET/CT were classified as (1) group A, focal; (2) group B, diffuse; and (3) group C, no uptake. The PET/CT findings were compared with the results of concurrent colonoscopy.

RESULTS

In group A, a total of 123 polyps of >0 mm were observed. Of these, nine polyps were colonic adenocarcinomas and six were high-grade dysplasia. The incidence of colonic adenocarcinomas was significantly higher in group A than in the other two groups (p = 0.037). There was a significant correlation between SUVmax values and incidence of colonic polyps of >10 mm (r = 0.471, p = 0.04). The distribution pattern of SUVmax in polyps with adenoma (>10 mm) was less homogenous than in polyps (>10 mm) with adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The focal colonic FDG uptake in PET/CT requires colonoscopic confirmation. The suspicion of colonic malignancy increased in the presence of polyps >10 mm that showed a positive correlation with the SUVmax.

The Clinical Meaning of Benign Colon Uptake in (18)F-FDG PET: Comparison with Colonoscopic Findings

Background/Aims

Benign colon ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake is frequently observed in asymptomatic individuals. Aims of this study were to investigate the benign colon uptake by whole body FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) in asymptomatic adults and to correlate those results with colonoscopic and histologic findings.

Methods

Among 3,540 subjects who had undergone FDG-PET, 43 subjects who were diagnosed to have benign colon uptake in FDG-PET and underwent colonoscopy were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were classified as diffuse or focal groups based on their FDG uptake patterns. PET results were analyzed together with colonoscopic and histologic findings.

Results

Forty-three subjects showed benign colon uptake in FDG-PET; 28 of them were shown as the diffuse group, while other 15 subjects were classified as the focal group. Five subjects among those showed diffuse uptake were diagnosed as adenoma. Seven among 15 subjects who showed focal uptake were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (n=2), adenoma (n=3), or non-neoplastic polyp (n=2). Positive predictive values were 25% in the diffuse group and 47% in the focal group.

Conclusions

We recommend that patients showing benign FDG uptake in the colon should be further evaluated by colonoscopy, especially for patients with focal FDG uptake.

Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: convention and controversy

The use of sensitive and specific imaging techniques for accurate initial staging and evaluation of response to therapy in patients with lymphoma is essential for their optimal management. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool and is being routinely used in staging, response evaluation, and posttreatment surveillance in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. PET/CT is currently widely used in clinical practice, but the established clinical benefit is currently restricted to the posttreatment evaluation of Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma. Although used in other histologic subtypes and in other clinical situations including response assessment, its impact on patient outcome remains to be demonstrated. We performed a literature search of PubMed from 1999 to 2011 using the following keywords: PET scan, FDG-PET, PET/CT, lymphoma. This review addresses the challenges and controversies in the use of PET/CT scans in the management of patients with lymphoma.

Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature

AIM

The aims of the present study were: (i) to evaluate the focal incidental colorectal uptake of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) and to correlate it with colonoscopy and histological findings; (ii) to evaluate the relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and clinical data and the anatomical site of [(18)F]FDG uptake; and (iii) to compare our results with those reported for incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG in the literature and those obtained from various screening programmes for colorectal cancer.

METHOD

The database of 6000 patients referred for [(18)F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) to our centre was retrospectively reviewed for incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG. Patients with focal uptake were selected and the aetiology of PET findings was verified with a subsequent colonoscopy and histopathological analysis when available.

RESULTS

Incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG was seen in 144 (2.4%) patients, of whom 64 (1.1%) had focal uptake; 48 out of these 64 patients underwent colonoscopy, which showed malignant tumours in 12 (25%), premalignant lesions in 19 (40%), non-neoplastic lesions in six (12%) and lesions not confirmed by colonoscopy in 11 (23%). Our data agreed with previously published data. Statistical analysis did not show any significant relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and patient sex or age, type of primary disease and anatomical site of [(18)F]FDG uptake. Comparing our data with various screening programmes, a significant difference was found only with series in which colonoscopy was performed in patients at high risk for colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Focal incidental colorectal uptake of [(18)F]FDG is observed in about 1% of PET/CT studies and carries a high risk of neoplastic disease. A PET-CT report should suggest colonoscopy when abnormal findings are reported.

Detectability of colorectal neoplasia with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the detectability of colorectal neoplasia with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT).

METHODS

Data for a total of 492 patients who had undergone both PET/CT and colonoscopy were analyzed. After the findings of PET/CT and colonoscopy were determined independently, the results were compared in each of the six colonic sites examined in all patients. The efficacy of PET/CT was determined using colonoscopic examination as the gold standard.

RESULTS

In all, 270 colorectal lesions 5 mm or more in size, including 70 pathologically confirmed malignant lesions, were found in 172 patients by colonoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for detecting any of the colorectal lesions were 36 and 98%, respectively. For detecting lesions 11 mm or larger, the sensitivity was increased to 85%, with the specificity remaining consistent (97%). Moreover, the sensitivity for tumors 21 mm or larger was 96% (48/50). Tumors with malignant or high-grade pathology were likely to be positive with PET/CT. A size of 10 mm or smaller [odds ratio (OR) 44.14, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 11.44-221.67] and flat morphology (OR 7.78, 95% CI 1.79-36.25) were significant factors that were associated with false-negative cases on PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of PET/CT for detecting colorectal lesions is acceptable, showing size- and pathology-dependence, suggesting, for the most part, that clinically relevant lesions are detectable with PET/CT. However, when considering PET/CT for screening purposes caution must be exercised because there are cases of false-negative results.

The clinical significance of incidental intra-abdominal findings on positron emission tomography performed to investigate pulmonary nodules

Background

Lung cancer is a common cause of cancer-related death. Staging typically includes positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, in which¹⁸F-fluoro-2-dexoy-D-glucose (FDG) is taken up by cells proportional to metabolic activity, thus aiding in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. Uptake of FDG can also occur in the abdomen. The clinical significance of incidental intraabdominal FDG uptake in the setting of pulmonary nodules is not well established. Our objective was to report on the clinical significance of incidental intra-abdominal FDG activity in the setting of lung cancer.

Methods

Fifteen hundred FDG-PET reports for studies performed for lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of incidental FDG-positive intraabdominal findings. Patient charts with positive findings were then reviewed and information extracted.

Results

Twenty-five patients (25/1500) demonstrated incidental intraabdominal FDG uptake thought to be significant (1.7%) with a mean patient age of 71 years. Colonic uptake was most common (n = 17) with 9 (52%) being investigated further. Of these 9 cases, a diagnosis of malignancy was made in 3 patients, pre-malignant adenomas in 2 patients, a benign lipoma in 1 patient and no abnormal findings in the remaining patients. 8 patients were not investigated further (3 diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer and 2 were of advanced age) secondary to poor prognosis.

Conclusion

Incidental abdominal findings in the colon on FDG-PET scan for work-up of pulmonary nodules need to be further investigated by colonoscopy.

Management of patients following detection of unsuspected colon lesions by PET imaging

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-established and integral component of multimodality imaging in oncology. However, the expanded use of PET in oncological and also non-oncological imaging (such as in assessing inflammatory conditions) has identified more lesions or tumors at unsuspected locations, such as in the large bowel during examination of patients not known to have colorectal disease. We review the clinical significance of colon lesions that were discovered incidentally by PET imaging and management strategies for gastroenterologists.

Detection of incidental colorectal tumours with 18F-labelled 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans: results of a prospective study

AIM

This study assessed the clinical significance of incidental colorectal 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake using (18) F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans and evaluated the importance of colonoscopy when incidental colorectal FDG uptake was observed.

METHOD

A prospective study was designed and conducted at a single institution over a 2-year period. In patients undergoing PET/CT scans, all with FDG uptake in the colorectum were assigned to have colonoscopy and biopsy. The value of PET/CT scanning was studied by comparison with the colonoscopy and biopsy results.

RESULTS

Among 10,978 PET/CT scans, one or more focal uptakes of FDG in the colorectum were observed in 148 (1.35%) patients. In 136 valid patients, malignant colorectal tumours and polyps were found in 23.5% and 20.5%, respectively,, while the colon in the other 56% was normal. A higher false-positive rate was found in the right colon compared with the distal colorectum (66.2%vs 36.7%, P = 0.004). A significant increase of the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was found among normal, polyps and cancer groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUVmax was the risk factor for predicting colorectal cancer or polyps and FDG uptake in the right colon was a negative predictive factor for finding cancers or polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study proves the necessity of colonoscopy when incidental FDG uptake is found on PET/CT imaging. The false-positive FDG uptake is more commonly observed in the right colon. Although the SUVmax value is higher in cancer patients, a high SUVmax value does not necessarily result in malignancies.

Positron emission tomography scan reveals an unusual source for cervical lymphadenopathy: right colon cancer

Cervical lymphadenopathy is usually related to the presence of an inflammatory disease or to a malignant localization. In the event of metastatic findings, the thyroid gland is the most likely primary site of a tumor. Metastatic lymphadenopathy represents a challenge when the primary tumor is unknown. A 64-year-old female with a supraclavicular palpable mass in the absence of underlying thyroid disease underwent ultrasonography of the neck, biopsy of the pathological lymph node, fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) and colonoscopy until right colon cancer was diagnosed. FDG-PET is a fast and reliable tool to discover the primary site of cervical masses of unknown origin.