Increased local failure for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST0531: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

Maintenance Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Long-Term Survival Analysis of the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group RMS 2005 Trial

The European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 trial evaluated maintenance chemotherapy in high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Patients were randomly assigned to either discontinue treatment (standard arm) or receive six 28-day cycles of vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) once per day on days 1, 8, and 15, plus once daily low-dose cyclophosphamide (25 mg/m2; experimental arm). Initial results showed improved overall survival (OS), but disease-free survival (DFS) improvement was not statistically significant. This report presents mature survival outcomes after extended follow-up. Between April 2006 and December 2016, 186 patients were enrolled in the standard arm and 185 in the experimental arm. After a median follow-up of 122.1 months from diagnosis and 114 months from random assignment, recurrence, progression, or death occurred in 103 patients (61 standard arm, 42 experimental arm). The 10-year DFS was 66.5% (95% CI, 59 to 74) in the standard arm versus 77.1% (95% CI, 70.3 to 82.5) in the experimental arm (P = .025). Corresponding 10-year OS rates were 70.8% (95% CI, 63.3 to 77.0) and 82.9% (95% CI, 76.6 to 87.7; P = .0099). Long-term results of the RMS2005 trial confirm the survival benefit of maintenance chemotherapy with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide for patients with high-risk RMS.

Nonorbital, Nonparameningeal Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric head and neck soft-tissue sarcoma. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study I-IV demonstrated that patients with alveolar RMS (ARMS), Group III disease, or clinically involved regional lymph nodes had a worse prognosis. The outcomes and prognostic features of patients with nonorbital, nonparameningeal head and neck (NONPHN) RMS treated in subsequent Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials have not been reported.

PROCEDURE

Patients enrolled in COG low-risk (D9602 or ARST0331), intermediate-risk (D9803 or ARST0531), and high-risk (D9802, ARST0431, or ARST08P1) trials were included. All patients received chemotherapy. Those with Group I (completely resected) ARMS and those with Group II (microscopic residual) or Group III (macroscopic residual) RMS received 36-50.4 Gy adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients with NONPHN RMS were treated across the seven trials. Most patients had cheek primaries (30%), Group II (38%) or Group III (34%) disease, no clinical or radiological evidence of nodal involvement (N0, 80%), and received RT (70%). The median follow-up was 7.7 years. Five-year event-free survival and overall survival were 70.8% and 83.7%, respectively. The regional failure rate for patients with N0 disease was 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes for patients with NONPHN RMS were similar to contemporary studies. Despite lower RT target volumes on the ARST-series versus the D-series protocols, patients with Group III tumors maintained comparable outcomes. Low regional failure rates suggested that sentinel lymph node sampling in patients with N0 disease and elective nodal RT in patients with ARMS and N0 disease are not necessary.

Current Approaches to the Treatment of Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Rhabdomyosarcoma and Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare mesenchymal tumors representing up to 7% of all cancers in children. In the pediatric population, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common histology while the remainder is composed of several distinct histotypes collectively known as nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). RMS and NRSTS have individualized staging and treatment paradigms. Through cooperative group clinical trials, our understanding of STS and outcomes have improved. However, patients with distant metastases and who relapse continue to fare poorly. Global collaborations are necessary to make greater progress for this highest risk population.

Current and Future Developments in Radiation Oncology Approach for Rhabdomyosarcoma

Radiotherapy is an indispensable treatment modality in the management of rhabdomyosarcoma. Numerous efforts have been made to improve outcomes. The current thinking and future developments in the radiation oncology field about how to raise cure rates, especially in the highest-risk patients, are presented.

Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Failed to Improve Local Control for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST1431: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate local failure (LF) rates for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Children's Oncology Group ARST1431 clinical trial, the first and largest international, phase 3 randomized study to use FOXO1 fusion status for risk stratification. To improve local control, radiation therapy (RT) dose was increased to 59.4 Gy for patients with tumors >5 cm and residual gross disease at the time of RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For the 297 patients included, LF was defined as progression or relapse at the primary site. The rate of LF was calculated 3-years after enrollment.

RESULTS

LF for group 3, FOXO1 fusion-positive patients (n = 58) compared with fusion-negative patients (n = 175) was 10.7% versus 21.5%, respectively (P = .08). The LF rate for patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis (n = 180; 24.4%) was higher than that of patients with tumors ≤5 cm at diagnosis (n = 117; 9.8%), P = .002. The risk of LF for patients who received proton (n = 99) versus photon RT (n = 126) was not different (16.1% vs 15.9%, P = .8). For the 75 patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis and gross disease at the time of RT, the boost to 59.4 Gy did not improve the 3-year LF rate compared with that of patients who did not receive the boost (29.7% vs 16.1%, P = .6). For patients with group 3/4 disease, those who underwent delayed primary excision (n = 72) had a lower LF rate compared with those who had RT alone (n = 151) (5.8% vs 19.7%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

On ARST1431, tumors >5 cm at diagnosis had poor local control despite dose escalation to 59.4 Gy. Proton and photon RT had equivalent local control. For select patients, delayed primary excision significantly improved local control.

Implications of Implementing Children's Oncology Group Risk Stratification to Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated on European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors are crucial in tailoring treatments for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) and the Children's Oncology Group (COG) employ similar prognostic factors, but utilize them differently resulting in diverse stratification systems. This diversity may result in dissimilar treatment approaches for comparable patients and hinder the comparison of clinical trial results.

PROCEDURE

We reclassified 1993 patients enrolled in the EpSSG RMS 2005 and MTS 2008 studies based on the risk stratification used in current EpSSG and COG trials, and compared the type and cumulative doses of chemotherapy recommended to the different risk groups. Alkylating agents were compared using the cyclophosphamide equivalent dose formula. Metastatic RMS with high-risk features were excluded because no standard recommended treatment exists.

RESULTS

Patients were variably distributed across EpSSG and COG risk stratifications. Notably, 34.2% of EpSSG standard-risk patients fell into three different COG risk groups (very low, low, and intermediate), and 66.8% of the total population, classified as standard, high, and very high risk by EpSSG, would all be considered intermediate risk by COG. Consequently, only 57.3% of the study population would receive comparable intensive chemotherapy under both EpSSG and COG protocols. Disparities emerged, with 16.5% undergoing more intensive and 17.2% receiving less intensive treatment in COG protocols compared to EpSSG studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows the complexities of the current RMS risk stratification systems, emphasizing the need for a global consensus. A unified approach would reduce the risk of disparate treatments for similar patients and facilitate more straightforward cross-study comparisons.

Endocrine dysfunction in long-term survivors of pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

Survivors of pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) are at risk of developing endocrinopathies following local treatment, resulting from radiation damage to the pituitary gland, hypothalamus, or thyroid gland, often at a young age. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of endocrine dysfunction in long-term HNRMS survivors and compare the prevalence of anterior pituitary insufficiency (API) among different local treatment strategies: external beam radiation with photons, external beam radiation with protons, microscopically radical surgery combined with external irradiation, and macroscopic radical surgery combined with brachytherapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma survivors treated between 1993 and 2017, with ≥2 years of follow-up, without recurrent disease or secondary malignancy were eligible for this study. The presence of any endocrine dysfunction was assessed cross-sectionally using Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grading, anthropometrics, and biochemical testing. Retrospective chart review was added to this clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Ninety-six survivors with long follow-up time (median, 9 years) were included. Any endocrinopathy was present in 35% of survivors, with 88% having pituitary, 6% peripheral (thyroid), and 6% combined insufficiencies. None had gonadal insufficiency. Growth hormone deficiency was diagnosed in 31 (32%) survivors, with additional pituitary insufficiencies in 12 (39%). In 8%, central precocious puberty preceded API. None of the survivors given brachytherapy had API.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pituitary dysfunction in HNRMS survivors is high, emphasizing the importance of systematic endocrine assessment during follow-up, including pubertal development and growth. Efforts should be made to further reduce extraneous irradiation to endocrine organs to prevent dysfunction later in life.

Late Events Occurring After 5 Years in Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, and 5-year overall survival exceeds 70%. With more long-term survivors, it is critical to understand the frequency of late events, including recurrence, second malignant neoplasm, and death, occurring 5 years after diagnosis, and the variables associated with these events. We report late events in patients enrolled on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group and Children's Oncology Group trials from 1997 to 2013 including D9602, D9803, D9802, ARST0331, ARST0431, ARST0531, and ARST08P1. A late event occurred in 2.9% of 5-year event-free survivors supporting guidelines to limit surveillance for these events to 5 years from diagnosis.

Outcomes for patients with perineal and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee

PURPOSE

To describe clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of patients with perineal and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma.

METHODS

The records of 51 patients (38 perineal and 13 perianal) enrolled on Children's Oncology Group clinical trials between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed.

RESULTS

At presentation, 53% were female, 65% were older than 10 years of age, 76% were alveolar histology, 76% were more than 5 cm, 84% were invasive, 65% were regional node positive by imaging, 49% were metastatic, only 16% were grossly resected upfront, and 25% of patients had a delayed excision. At a median follow-up of 6.13 years, estimated 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 38% [22.17%-53.38%], and overall survival (OS) was 42% [26.66%-58.21%]. The rates of local, regional, and distant failure were 15.6%, 13.7%, 43.1%, respectively; all failures ultimately died. By univariate analysis, only age more than 10 years negatively impacted 5-year EFS (p = .023) and OS (p = .09), and IRS Group also impacted OS (p = .043). In Cox proportional hazards model, neither of these variables were significant after adjusting for other factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with perineal and perianal rhabdomyosarcoma have a poor overall prognosis, probably related to poor patient and disease characteristics at presentation.

The Prognostic Significance of Early Tumor Volume Change in Rhabdomyosarcoma

Purpose

To describe early tumor volume change in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and investigate its association with overall survival (OS) and local failure.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective study included patients who received diagnoses of group III/IV RMS with available computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging scans at 2 time points: (1) pretherapy and (2) early therapy (acquired during weeks 8-12 of chemotherapy). Relative volumetric change (RVC) was calculated as the percentage of (early therapy - pretherapy volume) / (pretherapy volume). Cox regression was used to identify variables associated with OS. The Fine-Gray model was used to estimate local failure.

Results

Eligible patients (n = 55) had the following characteristics: median age at diagnosis, 9.6 years and median follow-up, 30.4 months. Most tumors were alveolar (61.8%), followed by embryonal (34.6%) and spindle cell/sclerosing (4%). The median RVC was -86.4% with larger decreases observed in alveolar versus nonalveolar RMS (-89.4% vs -69.8%, P = .043). For embryonal and spindle cell/sclerosing RMS, all of which were FOXO1 fusion negative, RVC was independently associated with OS (hazard ratio for every 50% reduction in RVC [HRRVC], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96; P = .037) and local failure (HRRVC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.99; P = .049). The predominant pattern of failure in embryonal and spindle cell/sclerosing RMS was local, and most were group III.

Conclusions

There was a greater reduction in tumor volume in alveolar versus nonalveolar RMS. Early tumor volume reduction was associated with OS and local failure in embryonal or spindle cell/sclerosing RMS, all of which were confirmed FOXO1 fusion negative and had higher incidence of local compared with distant failures.

NF1-Driven Rhabdomyosarcoma Phenotypes: A Comparative Clinical and Molecular Study of NF1-Mutant Rhabdomyosarcoma and NF1-Associated Malignant Triton Tumor

PURPOSE

Alterations of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene is the second most frequent genetic event in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), but its associations with clinicopathologic features, outcome, or coexisting molecular events are not well defined. Additionally, NF1 alterations, mostly in the setting of neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), drive the pathogenesis of most malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with divergent RMS differentiation (also known as malignant triton tumor [MTT]). Distinguishing between these entities can be challenging because of their pathologic overlap. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of NF1-mutant RMS compared with NF1-associated MTT for a better understanding of their pathogenesis.

METHODS

We investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular landscape of a cohort of 22 NF1-mutant RMS and a control group of 13 NF1-associated MTT. Cases were tested on a matched tumor-normal hybridization capture-based targeted DNA next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Among the RMS group, all except one were ERMS, with a median age of 17 years while for MTT the mean age was 39 years. Three MTTs were misdiagnosed as ERMS, having clinical impact in one. The most frequent coexisting alteration in ERMS was TP53 abnormality (36%), being mutually exclusive from NRAS mutations (14%). MTT showed coexisting CDKN2A/B and PRC2 complex alterations in 38% cases and loss of H3K27me3 expression. Patients with NF1-mutant RMS exhibited a 70% 5-year survival rate, in contrast to MTT with a 33% 5-year survival. All metastatic NF1-mutant ERMS were associated with TP53 alterations.

CONCLUSION

Patients with NF1-mutant ERMS lacking TP53 alterations may benefit from dose-reduction chemotherapy. On the basis of the diagnostic challenges and significant treatment and prognostic differences, molecular profiling of challenging tumors with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation is recommended.

The Capacity of Drug-Metabolising Enzymes in Modulating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Drugs to Treat Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) that predominantly affects children and teenagers. It is the most common STS in children (40%) and accounts for 5-8% of total childhood malignancies. Apart from surgery and radiotherapy in eligible patients, standard chemotherapy is the only therapeutic option clinically available for RMS patients. While survival rates for this childhood cancer have considerably improved over the last few decades for low-risk and intermediate-risk cases, the mortality rate remains exceptionally high in high-risk RMS patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. The intensification of chemotherapeutic protocols in advanced-stage RMS has historically induced aggravated toxicity with only very modest therapeutic gain. In this review, we critically analyse what has been achieved so far in RMS therapy and provide insight into how a diverse group of drug-metabolising enzymes (DMEs) possess the capacity to modify the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy. We provide suggestions for new therapeutic strategies that exploit the presence of DMEs for prodrug activation, targeted chemotherapy that does not rely on DMEs, and RMS-molecular-subtype-targeted therapies that have the potential to enter clinical evaluation.

Contemporary preclinical mouse models for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: from bedside to bench to bedside

Background

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric soft-tissue malignancy, characterized by high clinicalopathological and molecular heterogeneity. Preclinical in vivo models are essential for advancing our understanding of RMS oncobiology and developing novel treatment strategies. However, the diversity of scholarly data on preclinical RMS studies may challenge scientists and clinicians. Hence, we performed a systematic literature survey of contemporary RMS mouse models to characterize their phenotypes and assess their translational relevance.

Methods

We identified papers published between 01/07/2018 and 01/07/2023 by searching PubMed and Web of Science databases.

Results

Out of 713 records screened, 118 studies (26.9%) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Cell line-derived xenografts (CDX) were the most commonly utilized (n = 75, 63.6%), followed by patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and syngeneic models, each accounting for 11.9% (n = 14), and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) (n = 7, 5.9%). Combinations of different model categories were reported in 5.9% (n = 7) of studies. One study employed a virus-induced RMS model. Overall, 40.0% (n = 30) of the studies utilizing CDX models established alveolar RMS (aRMS), while 38.7% (n = 29) were embryonal phenotypes (eRMS). There were 20.0% (n = 15) of studies that involved a combination of both aRMS and eRMS subtypes. In one study (1.3%), the RMS phenotype was spindle cell/sclerosing. Subcutaneous xenografts (n = 66, 55.9%) were more frequently used compared to orthotopic models (n = 29, 24.6%). Notably, none of the employed cell lines were derived from primary untreated tumors. Only a minority of studies investigated disseminated RMS phenotypes (n = 16, 13.6%). The utilization areas of RMS models included testing drugs (n = 64, 54.2%), studying tumorigenesis (n = 56, 47.5%), tumor modeling (n = 19, 16.1%), imaging (n = 9, 7.6%), radiotherapy (n = 6, 5.1%), long-term effects related to radiotherapy (n = 3, 2.5%), and investigating biomarkers (n = 1, 0.8%). Notably, no preclinical studies focused on surgery.

Conclusions

This up-to-date review highlights the need for mouse models with dissemination phenotypes and cell lines from primary untreated tumors. Furthermore, efforts should be directed towards underexplored areas such as surgery, radiotherapy, and biomarkers.

Current Role of Topoisomerase I Inhibitors for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Malignancies and Their Potential Future Use as Payload of Sarcoma-Specific Antibody-Drug Conjugates

BACKGROUND

Topoisomerase I is an enzyme that plays a crucial part in DNA replication and transcription by the relaxation of supercoiled double-stranded DNA. Topoisomerase I inhibitors bind to the topoisomerase I cleavage complex, thereby stabilizing it and preventing the religation of the DNA strands, leading to DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Various topoisomerase I inhibitors have been evaluated in solid tumors, and irinotecan and topotecan have been approved for the treatment of epithelial malignancies. None of them have been approved for sarcoma, a diverse group of rare solid tumors with an unmet need for effective treatments.

SUMMARY

Topoisomerase I inhibitors have been evaluated in preclinical studies as single agents or in combination in solid tumors, some of which have included sarcomas where activity was observed. Clinical trials evaluating topoisomerase I inhibitors for the treatment of sarcoma have shown limited efficacy as monotherapy. In combination with other cytotoxic agents, topoisomerase I inhibitors have become part of clinical routine in selected sarcoma subtypes. Regimens such as irinotecan/vincristine/temozolomide are used in relapsed rhabdomyosarcoma, irinotecan/temozolomide and vincristine/topotecan/cyclophosphamide are commonly given in refractory Ewing sarcoma, and topotecan/carboplatin showed some activity in advanced soft tissue sarcoma. This review provides an overview of key studies with topoisomerase I inhibitors for the treatment of sarcoma. Topoisomerase I inhibitors are currently also being assessed as "payloads" for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), allowing for the targeting of specific antigen-expressing tumor cells and the delivery of the inhibitor directly to the tumor cells with the potential of enhancing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity. Here, we also provide a brief overview on topoisomerase I-ADCs.

KEY MESSAGE

Topoisomerase I inhibitors are an important component of some systemic therapies for selected sarcomas and have potent cytotoxic properties and pharmacological characteristics that make them relevant candidates as payloads for the development of sarcoma-specific ADCs. ADCs are antibody-based targeted agents allowing for efficient and specific delivery of a given drug to the tumor cell. Topoisomerase I-ADCs are a novel targeted delivery approach which may have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of topoisomerase I inhibitors in the treatment of sarcoma and warrants investigation in a broad variety of mesenchymal malignancies.

Which Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Need Radiotherapy? Analysis of the Radiotherapy Strategies of the CWS-96 and CWS-2002P Studies and SoTiSaR Registry

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare the indications, doses, and application methods of radiotherapy (RT) and their influence on prognosis of patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

METHODS

One thousand four hundred seventy patients with localized RMS 21 years and younger entered on CWS-96, CWS-2002P, and SoTiSaR were eligible for the analysis. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (IQR, 3.3-9.5).

RESULTS

The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and local control survival (LCS) for 910 (62%) irradiated versus nonirradiated patients were 71% versus 69% and 78% versus 73% (P = .03), respectively. Ninety-five percent of patients in IRS I (90% embryonal RMS [eRMS]) were nonirradiated (EFS, 87%). Irradiated patients with IRS II had improved LCS (91% v 80%; P = .01) and EFS (not significant). In IRS III, EFS and LCS were significantly better for RT patients: 71% versus 56% (P = 3.1e-06) and 76% versus 61% (P = 4.1e-07). Patients with tumors in the head and neck region (orbita, parameningeal, and nonparameningeal) and in other sites had significantly better EFS and LCS and in parameningeal also overall survival (OS). The efficacy of low RT doses of 32 Gy (hyperfractionated, accelerated RT [HART]) and 36 and 41.4 Gy (conventional fractionated RT [CFRT]) in the favorable groups and higher doses of 44.8 Gy (HART) and 50.4 and 55.4 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups was comparable. Proton RT was used predominantly in head/neck-parameningeal (HN-PM) tumors, with similar EFS and LCS to photon RT.

CONCLUSION

RT can be omitted in patients with IRS I eRMS. RT improves LCS and EFS in IRS II and III. RT improves OS in patients with HN-PM, with proton RT comparable with photon RT. Doses of 32 Gy (HART) or 36 and 41.4 Gy (CFRT) had comparable efficacy in patients with favorable risk profiles and 44.8 Gy (HART) or 50.4 and 55.8 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Soft tissue sarcomas

In the United States, approximately 850-900 children and adolescents each year are diagnosed with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). STS are divided into rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and non-rhabdomyosarcoma STS (NRSTS). RMS and NRSTS are risk stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 90%, 50%-70%, and 20%, respectively. Recent key achievements from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) STS Committee include the identification of new molecular prognostic factors for RMS, development and validation of a novel risk stratification system for NRSTS, successful completion of a collaborative NRSTS clinical trial with adult oncology consortia, and collaborative development of the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT). Current COG trials for RMS are prospectively evaluating a new risk stratification system that incorporates molecular findings, de-intensification of therapy for a very low-risk subgroup, and augmented therapy approaches for intermediate- and high-risk RMS. Trials for NRSTS exploring novel targets and local control modalities are in development.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Radiation oncology

Radiation oncology is an integral part of the multidisciplinary team caring for children with cancer. The primary goal of our committee is to enable the delivery of the safest dose of radiation therapy (RT) with the maximal potential for cure, and to minimize toxicity in children by delivering lower doses to normal tissues using advanced technologies like intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and proton therapy. We provide mentorship for y ators and are actively involved in educating the global radiation oncology community. We are leaders in the effort to discover novel radiosensitizers, radioprotectors, and advanced RT technologies that could help improve outcomes of children with cancer.

Clinical features and outcomes of infantile soft-tissue sarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study in Beijing

Background

Soft-tissue sarcomas during infancy are rare and understudied. With no data on this specific condition, we performed a retrospective study of infant-onset sarcomas based on a multi-institutional cohort in Beijing, China, collected over the past decade. We reviewed infantile soft-tissue sarcomas' clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes.

Materials and Methods

The patients with soft-tissue sarcoma diagnosed from 0 to 12 months in four primary children's hospitals in Beijing from January 2010 to December 2019 were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-one patients were enrolled, including 31 males and 20 females. The median age at the diagnosis was five months (range, 0-12), and seven (13.7%) patients were diagnosed in the first month of their life. Histologically, twenty-five patients were diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), six were diagnosed with extraosseous Ewing sarcoma (EES), and twenty were diagnosed with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). The treatment principles and details of RMS focused on reference to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) protocols. For EES and NRSTS, chemotherapy was prescribed according to children's oncology group protocols. The five-year EFS/OS rates of RMS were 26.4% ± 19.5%/56.2 ± 17.8%, the five-year EFS/OS rate of EES was 50% ± 20.4%, and the five-year EFS/OS of NRSTS was 85.2% ± 9.8%/100%.

Conclusions

Infant-onset soft-tissue sarcoma is heterogeneous. The primary location of the abdominal or pelvic cavity of RMS and EWS was at a later stage and had a poorer prognosis. Multimodal therapy resulted in successful disease control for the majority of patients. Standardization of treatment protocols will facilitate care for such challenging conditions.

Management and outcomes of chest wall rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee

INTRODUCTION

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the chest wall presents unique management challenges and local control considerations. The benefit of complete excision is uncertain and must be weighed against potential surgical morbidity. Our aim was to assess factors, including local control modality, associated with clinical outcomes in children with chest wall RMS.

METHODS

Forty-four children with RMS of the chest wall from low-, intermediate-, and high-risk Children's Oncology Group studies were reviewed. Predictors of local failure-free survival (FFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed, including clinical characteristics and staging, primary tumor anatomic locations, and local control modalities. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Tumors were localized in 25 (57%) and metastatic in 19 (43%), and they involved the intercostal region (52%) or superficial muscle alone (36%). Clinical group was I (18%), II (14%), III (25%), and IV (43%), and ultimately 19 (43%) patients had surgical resection (upfront or delayed), including 10 R0 resections. Five-year local FFS, EFS, and OS were 72.1%, 49.3%, and 58.5%, respectively. Univariate factors associated with local FFS included age, International Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) group, extent of surgical excision, tumor size, superficial tumor location, and presence of regional or metastatic disease. Other than tumor size, the same factors were associated with EFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest wall RMS has variable presentation and outcome. Local control is a significant contributor to EFS and OS. Complete surgical excision, whether upfront or after induction chemotherapy, is usually only possible for smaller tumors confined to the superficial musculature but is associated with improved outcomes. While overall outcomes remain poor for patients with initially metastatic tumors, regardless of local control modality, complete excision may be beneficial for patients with localized tumors if it can be achieved without excess morbidity.

Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma-An Integrated Clinicopathologic and Genomic Study to Improve Risk Stratification

PURPOSE

Extremity rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is associated with a very poor outcome compared with other sites, mainly because of its high incidence of alveolar histology and regional lymph node involvement. To better define prognostic markers in this clinical subset, we investigated our experience of 61 patients with extremity RMS treated at our tertiary cancer center for the past 2 decades.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients had a median age of 8 years at diagnosis, equal gender distribution, and two-thirds occurred in the lower extremity. Most (85%) patients had FOXO1 fusion-positive alveolar RMS (ARMS), with 70% having a PAX3::FOXO1 transcript. Remaining were seven patients with fusion-negative embryonal RMS (ERMS) and two with MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing RMS (SRMS). In 40% of the patients, material was available for DNA-based targeted sequencing using MSK-IMPACT cancer gene panel.

RESULTS

One-third of patients presented with localized disease at diagnosis while the remaining had regional nodal (18%) or distant metastases (51%). Metastatic disease, high-risk group, and age 10 years or older significantly affected the overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 2.68 [P = .004], 2.78 [P = .010] and 2.26 [P = .034], respectively). Although the presence of metastatic disease had a dismal impact on 5-year EFS and OS (19% and 29%, respectively), nodal involvement had a comparatively lower impact on 5-year EFS and 5-year OS (43% and 66%, respectively). PAX3::FOXO1 ARMS had worse prognosis and afflicted older children compared with PAX7::FOXO1 (HR = 3.45, P = .016). The most common events in the ARMS group included MED12 alterations, CDK4 amplifications, and CDKN2A deletions (8%-17%). The latter two abnormalities were mutually exclusive, enriched for acral and high-risk lesions, and correlated with poor outcome on OS (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Our data provide rationale for considering the integration of molecular abnormalities to refine risk stratification in extremity RMS.

Rhabdomyosarcoma with isolated lung metastases: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

To determine outcomes of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with isolated lung metastases.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for 428 patients with metastatic RMS treated on COG protocols. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with other metastatic sites (n = 373), patients with lung-only metastases (n = 55) were more likely to be <10 years of age, have embryonal histology (embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma), have N0 disease, and less likely to have primary extremity tumors. Lung-only patients had significantly better survival outcomes than patients with all other sites of metastatic disease (p < .0001) with 5-year EFS of 48.1 versus 18.8% and 5-year OS of 64.1 versus 26.9%. Patients with lung-only metastases, and those with a single extrapulmonary site of metastasis, had better survival compared with patients with two or more sites of metastatic disease (p < .0001). In patients with ERMS and lung-only metastases, there was no significant difference in survival between patients ≥10 years and 1-9 years (5-year EFS: 58.3 vs. 68.2%, 5-year OS: 66.7 vs. 67.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

With aggressive treatment, patients with ERMS and lung-only metastatic disease have superior EFS and OS compared with patients with other sites of metastatic disease, even when older than 10 years of age. Consideration should be given to including patients ≥10 years with ERMS and lung-only metastases in the same group as those <10 years in future risk stratification algorithms.

The significance of margins in pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: Consensus on surgical margin definition harmonization from the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT)

BACKGROUND

Margin status following surgery in children, adolescents, and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas is controversial and has been defined differently by various specialties, with definitions changing over time and by cooperative group. The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, European pediatric Soft Tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the European Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) devoted to improving patient outcomes by pooling and mining cooperative group clinical trial data.

METHODS

The INSTRuCT non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) working group aimed to develop international harmonized recommendations regarding surgical margin assessment and definitions in children and adolescents with soft tissue tumors.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This review addresses accepted principles and areas of controversy, including the perspectives of surgeons, pathologists, radiation oncologists, and pediatric oncologists, to develop a framework for building common guidelines for future research.

Translational Implications for Radiosensitizing Strategies in Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood and adolescence that includes FP-RMS, harboring the fusion oncoprotein PAX3/7-FOXO1 and FN-RMS, often mutant in the RAS pathway. Risk stratifications of RMS patients determine different prognostic groups and related therapeutic treatment. Current multimodal therapeutic strategies involve surgery, chemotherapy (CHT) and radiotherapy (RT), but despite the deeper knowledge of response mechanisms underpinning CHT treatment and the technological improvements that characterize RT, local failures and recurrence frequently occur. This review sums up the RMS classification and the management of RMS patients, with special attention to RT treatment and possible radiosensitizing strategies for RMS tumors. Indeed, RMS radioresistance is a clinical problem and further studies aimed at dissecting radioresistant molecular mechanisms are needed to identify specific targets to hit, thus improving RT-induced cytotoxicity.

Local control of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: An expert consensus guideline from the International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT)

The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) consists of a collaboration between the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS). As part of the larger initiative of INSTRuCT to provide consensus expert opinions for clinical treatment of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, we sought to provide updated, evidenced-based consensus guidelines for local treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma using both existing literature as well as recommendations from the relevant cooperative group clinical trials. Overall, parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma represents a distinctly challenging disease to treat, given its location near many critical structures in the head and neck, frequently advanced local presentation, and predilection for local failure. Definitive chemoradiation remains the standard treatment approach for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, with surgery often limited to biopsy or salvage therapy for recurrent disease. In this consensus paper, we specifically discuss consensus guidelines and evidence for definitive local management with radiotherapy, with a focus on imaging for radiotherapy planning, dose and timing of radiation, approach for nodal irradiation, various radiation techniques, including proton therapy, and the limited role of surgical resection.

Clinical group and modified TNM stage for rhabdomyosarcoma: A review from the Children's Oncology Group

The Children's Oncology Group (COG) uses Clinical Group (CG) and modified Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage to classify rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). CG is based on surgicopathologic findings and is determined after the completion of initial surgical procedure(s) but prior to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The modified TNM stage is based on clinical and radiographic findings and is assigned prior to any treatment. These systems have evolved over several decades. We review the history, evolution, and rationale behind the current CG and modified TNM classification systems used by COG for RMS. Data from the seven most recently completed and reported frontline COG trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARST0431, ARST0531, ARST08P1) were analyzed, and confirm that CG and modified TNM stage remain relevant and useful for predicting prognosis in RMS. We propose updates based on recent data and discuss factors warranting future study to further optimize these classification systems.

Optimizing Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment in Adolescents and Young Adults

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common form of soft tissue sarcoma in children, but can also develop in adolescents and young adults (AYA). The mainstay of treatment is multi-agent chemotherapy, ideally with concomitant local treatment, including surgical resection and/or radiation therapy. Although most treatment decisions for RMS in AYA are based on scientific evidence accumulated through clinical studies of pediatric RMS, treatment outcomes are significantly inferior in AYA patients than in children. Factors responsible for the significantly poor outcomes in AYA are tumor biology, the physiology specific to the age group concerned, refractoriness to multimodal treatments, and various psychosocial and medical care issues. The present review aims to examine the various issues involved in the treatment and care of AYA patients with RMS, discuss possible solutions, and provide an overview of the literature on the topic with several observations from the author's own experience. Clinical trials for RMS in AYA are the best way to develop an optimal treatment. However, a well-designed clinical trial requires a great deal of time and resources, especially when targeting such a rare population. Until clinical trials are designed and implemented, and their findings duly analyzed, we must provide the best possible practice for RMS treatment in AYA patients based on our own expertise in manipulating the dosage schedules of various chemotherapeutic agents and administering local treatments in a manner appropriate for each patient. Precision medicine based on state-of-the-art cancer genomics will also form an integral part of this personalized approach. In the current situation, the only way to realize such a holistic treatment approach is to integrate new developments and findings, such as gene-based diagnostics and treatments, with older, fundamental evidence that can be selectively applied to individual cases.

An update on rhabdomyosarcoma risk stratification and the rationale for current and future Children's Oncology Group clinical trials

Children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) comprise a heterogeneous population with variable overall survival rates ranging between approximately 6% and 100% depending on defined risk factors. Although the risk stratification of patients has been refined across five decades of collaborative group studies, molecular prognostic biomarkers beyond FOXO1 fusion status have yet to be incorporated prospectively in upfront risk-based therapy assignments. This review describes the evolution of risk-based therapy and the current risk stratification, defines a new risk stratification incorporating novel biomarkers, and provides the rationale for the current and upcoming Children's Oncology Group RMS studies.

Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Children and Adolescents with Localized Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated on the CWS-2002P Protocol

We report here the results of the prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled CWS-2002P study in patients ≤ 21 years with localized RMS developed with the aim to improve the long-term outcome by adapting the burden of therapy to risk profile and to investigate the feasibility and relation to the outcome of maintenance therapy (MT) in the high-risk groups. Patients were allocated into low-risk (LR), standard-risk (SR), high-risk (HR), and very high-risk (VHR) groups. Chemotherapy consisted of vincristine (VCR) and dactinomycin (ACTO-D) for all patients with the addition of ifosfamide (IFO) in the SR, HR, and VHR and doxorubicin (DOX) in the HR and VHR groups. Low-dose cyclophosphamide and vinblastine maintenance therapy (MT) over 6 months was recommended in the HR and VHR groups. A total of 444 patients have been included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 9·6 years (IQR 7·6–10·9) for patients alive, the 5-year EFS and OS for the whole group was 73% (95% CI 69–77) and 80% (95% CI 76–84), respectively. The 5-year EFS by risk group was 100% in the LR, 79% (95% CI 72–84) in the SR, 69% (95% CI 63–75) in the HR, and 42% (95% CI 23–61) in the VHR (log-rank p = 0.000). The 5-year EFS was 77% (95% CI 70–84%) for 155 patients in the HR group who received MT as compared to 63% (95% CI 50–76) for 49 patients who did not (log-rank p = 0.015). Neither the reduction in the IFO dose in the SR nor the increased dose intensity of DOX in HR groups influenced the outcome when compared to the previous CWS and other European studies. MT was feasible, seemed to have an impact on prognosis, and should be studied in a well-controlled prospective trial in this patient population. The weighting of risk factors used for therapy stratification needs to be reevaluated.

Rising drug cost impacts on cost-effectiveness of 2 chemotherapy regimens for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

The Children's Oncology Group clinical trial for intermediate risk rhabdomyosarcoma randomized participants to a combination of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) alone or VAC alternating with vincristine plus irinotecan (VAC/VI). Clinical outcomes were similar, but toxicity profiles differed. This study estimates the cost differences between arms from the health care system's perspective.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of VAC versus VAC/VI. Protocol-required or recommended medications and laboratory studies were included. Costs were obtained from national databases or supporting literature and inflated to 2019 US dollars. Demographic and outcome data were obtained from the clinical trial and directed chart reviews. Life-years (LY) were estimated from life-expectancy tables and discounted by 3% annually. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and alternative clinical scenarios identified factors driving costs.

RESULTS

Mean direct medical costs of VAC and VAC/VI were $164,757 and $102,303, respectively. VAC was associated with an additional 0.97 LY and an ICER of $64,386/LY compared with VAC/VI. The ICER was sensitive to survival estimations and to alternative clinical scenarios including outpatient cyclophosphamide delivery (ICER $49,037/LY) or substitution of alternative hematopoietic growth factor schedules (ICER $73,191-$91,579/LY). Applying drug prices from 2012 decreased the total costs of VAC by 20% and VAC/VI by 15% because of changes in dactinomycin and pegfilgrastim prices.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither arm was clearly more cost-effective. Pharmaceutical pricing and location of treatment drove costs and may inform future treatment decisions. Rising pharmaceutical costs added $30,000 per patient, a finding important for future drug-pricing policy decisions.

LAY SUMMARY

Two chemotherapy regimens recently tested side-by-side for rhabdomyosarcoma had similar tumor outcomes, but different side effects. The health care costs of each regimen were compared; neither was clearly more cost-effective. However, the costs of each treatment changed dramatically with choices of supportive medicines and location of treatment. Costs of treatment rose by 15% to 20% because of rising US drug costs not associated with the clinical trial.

Diagnostic and treatment intervals are not associated with survival in rhabdomyosarcoma: A Cancer in Young People in Canada study

BACKGROUND

Delay in diagnosis and treatment initiation can be associated with adverse outcomes in children with cancer. Diagnostic interval (DI) is defined as the time between the date of first health care contact for symptoms related to cancer to the date of cancer diagnosis, and treatment interval (TI) is defined as interval between the definitive cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment initiation. We aimed to determine the predictors of DI and TI in children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and their association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Using the Cancer in Young People in Canada (CYP-C) national population-based database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of children (0-14.99 years) newly diagnosed with RMS between 2001 and 2015 in Canada. Quantile regression was used to assess the predictors of DI and TI, and Cox regression was used to determine if these intervals were associated with EFS and OS.

RESULTS

Median DI and TI were 16.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-38.0) and 5 days (IQR 0-12), respectively. DI and TI were not significantly associated with age at diagnosis, sex, race, tumor site, stage or histology, treatment region, distance from treatment center, income quintile or diagnosis year (all p > .05). DI and TI were not associated with EFS (DI: hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05, p = .871; TI: HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, p = .053) or OS (DI: HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05, p = .797; TI: HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.05, p = .155).

CONCLUSIONS

In the publicly funded Canadian health care system, DI and TI did not affect the survival of children with RMS.

TP53 mutations increase radioresistance in rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma

BACKGROUND

p53 plays a key role in the DNA repair process and response to ionising radiation. We sought to determine the clinical phenotype of TP53 mutations and p53 pathway alterations in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) treated with radiation.

METHODS

Of patients with available genomic sequencing, we identified 109 patients with RMS and ES treated to a total of 286 radiation sites. We compared irradiated tumour control among tumours with TP53 mutations (n = 40) to those that were TP53 wild-type (n = 246). We additionally compared irradiated tumour control among tumours with any p53 pathway alteration (defined as tumours with TP53 mutations or TP53 wild-type tumours identified to have MDM2/4 amplification and/or CDKN2A/B deletion, n = 78) to those without such alterations (n = 208).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 26 months from radiation. TP53 mutations were associated with worse irradiated tumour control among the entire cohort (hazard ratio, HR = 2.8, P < 0.0001). Tumours with any p53 pathway alteration also had inferior irradiated tumour control (HR = 2.0, P = 0.003). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for tumour histology, intent of radiation, presence of gross disease, and biologically effective dose, TP53 mutations continued to be associated with a radioresistant phenotype (HR = 7.1, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that TP53 mutations are associated with increased radioresistance in RMS and ES. Novel strategies to overcome this radioresistance are important for improved outcomes in p53 disruptive RMS and ES.

A case of primary CNS embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma with PAX3-NCOA2 fusion and systematic meta-review

PURPOSE

Primary central nervous system (CNS) rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare mesenchymal tumor predominantly seen in children and associated with a poor outcome. We report a case of primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma with PAX3-NCOA2 fusion and present a systematic meta-review of primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma to characterize this rare tumor.

METHODS

We present the case of a 6-year-old boy with primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma in the posterior fossa. In a systematic meta-review, we compare the demographic data of primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma with data of rhabdomyosarcoma at all sites from the SEER database and analyze clinical factors associated with survival outcome.

RESULTS

Our patient underwent gross total resection and received vincristine, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide with early introduction of concurrent focal radiation and remained alive with no evidence of disease for 2 years after the end of therapy. Histopathological review revealed embryonal-type rhabdomyosarcoma, and whole-transcriptome analysis revealed PAX3 (EX6)-NCOA2 (EX12) fusion. In all, 77 cases of primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma were identified through the meta-review. The demographic data of primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma were similar to data of rhabdomyosarcoma at all sites. Overall and event-free survival outcomes were available for 64 and 56 patients, respectively, with a 3-year OS of 29.0% and a 3-year EFS of 25.7%. The group that received trimodal treatment exhibited better survival outcomes, with a 3-year OS of 57.4% and a 3-year EFS of 46.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary CNS rhabdomyosarcoma shares common histological, molecular, and demographic features with non-CNS rhabdomyosarcoma. A trimodal treatment approach with early introduction of radiation therapy may result in favorable survival outcomes.

Disease Control and Patterns of Failure After Proton Beam Therapy for Rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

Pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are treated with multimodal therapy, often with radiation therapy (RT) as part of local therapy. We report on the efficacy and patterns of failure after proton beam therapy (PBT) for RMS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2006 and February 2017, patients with RMS were enrolled in a prospective institutional review board-approved registry protocol for pediatric patients undergoing PBT. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment related outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-four RMS patients were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (CT) and PBT. The majority of patients had head and neck (49%) and genitourinary (30%) primaries. Median tumor size was 4.1 cm (range, 1.0-16.5 cm); 33 patients (35%) had primary tumors >5 cm. Median cyclophosphamide equivalent dose was 14.4 g/m² (range, 0-30.8 g/m²). Median time from CT initiation to RT initiation was 13 weeks (range, 1-58 weeks). With median follow-up of 4 years, 4-year overall survival (OS) was 71%, and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63%. Thirty patients (32%) experienced relapse (13% with local failure [LF]). Four-year local control (LC) was 85% overall; 4-year LC rates were 100% for low-risk, 85% for intermediate-risk, and 55% for high-risk patients (P = .02). Tumor size predicted LC (P = .007), with 7% versus 33% LF rate by tumor size (≤5 cm vs >5 cm). Delayed RT delivery (≥13 weeks from initiation of CT) predicted worse LC (P = .01). Increased tumor size predicted both inferior PFS (P = .02) and OS (P = .01). Delayed RT delivery predicted both inferior PFS (P = .04) and OS (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

PBT provides LC comparable to prior studies using photon RT. Inferior LC, PFS, and OS rates were observed for patients with larger tumors and those treated with delayed RT. This finding supports ongoing prospective efforts to dose-escalate treatment of tumors >5 cm; however, these data call into question the optimal timing of local therapy, particularly for patients treated with reduced-dose cyclophosphamide.

Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma

The use of radiation therapy is an important part of multimodality treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma. The specific doses, treatment volumes, and techniques used in radiation therapy can vary dramatically based upon a number of factors including location, tumor size, and molecular characteristics, resulting in complex decisions in treatment planning. This article reviews the principles of evaluation and management for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma including a summary of the historical studies upon which current management is based.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of infants compared with children diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma: Analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results data from 2000 to 2016

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma of childhood, but occurs infrequently in infants (<1 year). Historically, infants with RMS have worse overall survival compared to other pediatric age groups.

AIM

This study aims to assess the clinical features and treatment factors associated with survival comparing infants to children aged 1-9 years diagnosed with RMS.

METHODS

Children aged <10 years diagnosed with RMS between 2000 and 2016 were identified using the SEER database. Descriptive statistics were used to assess demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of infants and children with RMS. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to assess for factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

Age <1 year was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. Compared to children aged 1-9 years, fewer infants received standard of care therapy, that is, chemotherapy combined with local control (surgery and/or radiation; 86.8 vs. 75.7%; p = .009). In comparing the frequency of specific treatment modalities (used alone or in combination with other modalities), infants were less likely to receive radiation therapy (34.0 vs. 66.4%; p < .001) and more likely to receive surgery (68.9 vs. 57.5%; p = .02) than children aged 1-9 years. Across age groups, chemotherapy combined with local control was significantly associated with reduced mortality. Alveolar histology, metastatic disease, and Hispanic ethnicity were negatively associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Age of <1 year was an independent risk factor for increased mortality from RMS compared to ages 1-9 years. Fewer infants were treated with chemotherapy combined with local control, the therapy associated with best survival in all age groups. Other factors contributing to differences in survival should be further explored.

Proton radiotherapy for infant rhabdomyosarcoma: Rethinking young age as an adverse prognostic factor

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

In infants with rhabdomyosarcoma, young age is considered an adverse prognostic factor and treatment is often attenuated to reduce side effects. Proton therapy may improve the therapeutic ratio in these patients. We report outcomes in infants with rhabdomyosarcoma treated with proton therapy.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, 37 infants <24 months old with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma received proton therapy. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit. The log-rank test assessed significance between selected prognostic factors. Toxicity was graded per CTCAEv5.0.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Overall, 76% of patients had an unfavorable primary site. Median dose was 50.4GyRBE. At 5 years, LC, PFS, and OS rates were 83%, 78%, and 83%. On univariate analysis, 5-year LC and OS were inferior for favorable versus unfavorable disease sites (67% vs 89%, 67% vs 89%, respectively; p < .05) and 5-year OS was superior in stage 3 versus stage 1-2 disease (91% vs 69%; p = .05), owing to inclusion of nasal ala patients among stage 1. Of 9 recurrences, 7 were in-field, 4 occurring in infants with nasal ala primaries. Recategorizing nasal ala as an unfavorable site resulted in 100% 5-year LC and OS for favorable sites. Six infants experienced late grade 3 toxicity. None developed grade 4 or 5 late toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Young age alone may not be an adverse prognostic factor provided infants receive local therapy similar to older children. Consideration should be given to classifying nasal ala primaries as an unfavorable site.

Radiation therapy for infants with cancer

The clinical outcomes for infants with malignant tumors are often worse than older children due to a combination of more biologically aggressive disease in some cases, and increased toxicity-or deintensification of therapies due to concern for toxicity-in others. Especially in infants and very young children, finding the appropriate balance between maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity-in particular late side effects-is crucial. We review here the management of malignant tumors in infants and very young children, focusing on central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and rhabdomyosarcoma.

Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a heterogeneous disease both in presentation and histology. Improvements in a multimodality therapy resulted in the improved overall survival for patients with a low-risk and intermediate-risk disease but not for patients with a metastatic disease. We reviewed and contrasted the North American and European practice patterns, though ultimately the principles of staging, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are similar in both Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Paediatric Oncology treatment approaches. Efforts are underway to investigate improved local control rates in higher risk patients using radiation dose escalation strategies, and delayed primary excision in select cases. The prognostic significance of imaging-based chemotherapy response, proton therapy, novel biomarkers, and targeted drugs will be determined in upcoming clinical trials.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Sarcomas

Neonatal sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare soft tissue neoplasms that present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Recent advances in molecular profiling have improved diagnostic capabilities and reveal novel therapeutic targets. Clinical trials demonstrate differences in behavior between sarcoma subtypes that allow for better clinical management. Surgical resection has been replaced with a multimodal approach that includes chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite these advances, neonates with sarcoma continue to fare worse than histologically similar sarcomas in older children, likely reflecting differences in tumor biology and the complexities of neonatal medicine. This review focuses on recent advances in managing neonatal sarcomas.

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with regional nodal involvement: Results of a combined analysis from two cooperative groups

BACKGROUND

Treatment of children and adolescents with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) and regional nodal involvement (N1) have been approached differently by North American and European cooperative groups. In order to define a better therapeutic strategy, we analyzed two studies conducted between 2005 and 2016 by the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) and Children's Oncology Group (COG).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with ARMS N1 enrolled in either EpSSG RMS2005 or in COG ARST0531. Chemotherapy in RMS2005 comprised ifosfamide + vincristine + dactinomycin + doxorubicin (IVADo), IVA and maintenance (vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide); in ARST0531, it consisted of either vincristine + dactinomycin + cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine + irinotecan (VI). Local treatment was similar in both protocols.

RESULTS

The analysis of the clinical characteristics of 239 patients showed some differences between study groups: in RMS2005, advanced Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) and large tumors predominated. There were no differences in outcomes between the two groups: 5-year event-free survival (EFS), 49% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39-59) and 44% (95% CI: 30-58), and overall survival (OS), 51% (95% CI: 41-61) and 53.6% (95% CI: 40-68) in RMS2005 and ARST0531, respectively. In RMS2005, EFS of patients with FOXO1-positive tumors was significantly inferior to those with FOXO1-negative (49.3% vs 73%, P = .034). In contrast, in ARST0531, EFS of patients with FOXO1-positive tumors was 45% compared with 43.8% for those with FOXO1-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patients with ARMS N1 was similar in both protocols. However, patients with FOXO1 fusion-negative tumors enrolled in RMS2005 showed a significantly better outcome, suggesting that different strategies of chemotherapy may have an impact in the outcome of this subgroup of patients.

Benefit of delayed primary excision in rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Most children with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have gross disease (group III) at the initiation of chemotherapy. Delayed primary excision (DPE) after induction chemotherapy allows for a reduction in adjuvant radiation dose, but with the risk of potential surgical morbidity. The objectives of this study were to compare outcomes in children with group III RMS who did and did not undergo DPE and to assess surgical morbidity.

METHODS

The study included 369 patients who had clinical group III RMS at sites amenable to DPE from intermediate-risk Children's Oncology Group studies D9803 (encouraged DPE) and ARST0531 (discouraged DPE).

RESULTS

The primary tumor site was bladder/prostate (136 patients; 37%), extremity (97 patients; 26%), trunk (24 patients; 7%), retroperitoneum (91 patients; 25%), or intrathoracic/perineum/perianal (21 patients; 6%). In total, 112 patients (53.9%) underwent DPE in D9803, and 26 patients (16.2%) underwent DPE in ARST0531 (P < .001), with loss of vital organ or function in 30 of 138 patients (22%). DPE allowed for a reduced radiation dose in 110 of 135 patients (81%; 51% were reduced to 36 Gy, and 30% were reduced to 42 Gy). Patients who underwent DPE had improved unadjusted overall survival (P = .013). In adjusted regression analysis, the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.16) was similar for patients who did and did not undergo DPE and was improved for the subset of patients who had tumors of the trunk and retroperitoneum (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with group III RMS have equivalent or improved outcomes with DPE and can receive a decreased radiation dose for definitive local control. The choice of local control modality should weigh the potential morbidity of surgery versus that of higher dose irradiation.

Evaluating the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Paradigm for the Local Management of Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed our experience treating patients with localized extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) to determine optimal local management strategies for this rare disease.

METHODS

Sixty patients with localized EES treated at our institution between 1994 and 2018 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimates disease outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 74 months (interquartile range [IQR], 17-121). Half the patients (n = 30) received combined-modality local therapy (CMT) with both surgery and radiation therapy (RT), whereas the other half received single-modality local therapy (SMT) with either surgery or RT. All patients received chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival was 76%. Twenty-two patients (37%) developed recurrence at a median time of 15 months (IQR, 5-56 months) resulting in 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 65%. On univariate analysis, the use of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved 5-year PFS (71% vs. 50%, p = .04) compared with those who received one or the other. Furthermore, 11 patients (18%) developed local recurrences at a median time of 14 months (IQR, 2-19 months), resulting in a 5-year local control (LC) rate of 77%. Use of CMT was not associated with improved LC (83% vs. 72% SMT, p = .41). Also, use of CMT was the only factor associated with poorer disease-specific survival (vs. SMT; hazard ratio, 3.4; p = .047; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-11.4).

CONCLUSION

For patients with EES, CMT was not associated with a decreased rate of local relapse. These data suggest that SMT alone may be sufficient for LC in select patients. A multi-institutional collaborative effort should be considered to validate these findings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma is a rare chemosensitive sarcoma whose clinical course more closely follows Ewing sarcoma of bone rather than that of other soft tissue sarcomas. Based on this study, combined-modality local therapy did not confer a local control advantage compared with single-modality local therapy. Therefore, single-modality local therapy is likely adequate in select patients with favorable disease features, which has the advantage of ensuring prompt administration of systemic therapy. A multi-institutional collaborative effort is warranted to determine which patients may benefit from de-escalated local therapy.