Goals of care discussions for patients with blood cancers: Association of person, place, and time with end-of-life care utilization

Integrating Palliative Care and Hematologic Malignancies: Bridging the Gaps for Our Patients and Their Caregivers

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) struggle with immense physical and psychological symptom burden, which negatively affect their quality of life (QOL) throughout the continuum of illness. These patients are often faced with substantial prognostic uncertainty as they navigate their illness course, which further complicates their medical decision making, especially at the end of life (EOL). Consequently, patients with HM often endure intensive medical care at the EOL, including frequent hospitalization and intensive care unit admissions, and they often die in the hospital. Our EOL health care delivery models are not well suited to meet the unique needs of patients with HMs. Although studies have established the role of specialty palliative care for improving QOL and EOL outcomes in patients with solid tumors, numerous disease-, clinician-, and system-based barriers prevail, limiting the integration of palliative care for patients with HMs. Nonetheless, multiple studies have emerged over the past decade identifying the role of palliative care integration in patients with various HMs, resulting in improvements in patient-reported QOL, symptom burden, and psychological distress, as well as EOL care. Importantly, these studies have also identified active components of specialty palliative care interventions, including strategies to promote adaptive coping especially in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Future work can leverage the knowledge gained from specialty palliative care integration to develop and test primary palliative care interventions by training clinicians caring for patients with HMs to incorporate these strategies into their clinical practice.

Compassionate Communication and Advance Care Planning to improve End-of-life Care in Treatment of Haematological Disease 'ACT': Study Protocol for a Cluster-randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

To support the implementation of advance care planning and serious illness conversations in haematology, a previously developed conversation intervention titled 'Advance Consultations Concerning your Life and Treatment' (ACT) was found feasible. This study aims to investigate the effect of ACT on the quality of end-of-life care in patients with haematological malignancy and their informal caregivers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a nationwide 2-arm cluster randomised trial randomising 40 physician-nurse clusters across seven haematological departments in Denmark to provide standard care or ACT intervention. A total of 400 patients with haematological malignancies and their informal caregivers will be included. The ACT intervention includes an ACT conversation that centres on discussing the patient's prognosis, worries, hopes and preferences for future treatment. The intervention is supported by clinician training and supervision, preparatory materials for patients and informal caregivers, and system changes including dedicated ACT-conversation timeslots and templates for documentation in medical records.This study includes two primary outcomes: (1) the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy within the last 30 days of death and (2) patients' and informal caregivers' symptoms of anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) at 3 6, 9, 12 and 18 months follow-up. Mixed effects models accounting for clusters will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Declaration of Helsinki and the European GDPR regulations as practised in Denmark are followed through all aspects of the study. Findings will be made available to the participants, patient organisations, funding bodies, healthcare professionals and researchers at national and international conferences and through publication in peer-reviewed international journals.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05444348). The Regional Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (record no: 21067634) has decided that approval is not necessary as per Danish legislation. Study approval has been obtained from The Capital Region of Denmark Data Protection Agency (record no: P-2022-93).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05444348.

Cost of Hospitalization Associated with Inpatient Goals-of-Care Program Implementation at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A Propensity Score Analysis

The impact of goals-of-care programs on acute hospitalization costs is unclear. We compared the hospitalization cost in an 8-month period before implementation of a multimodal interdisciplinary goals-of-care program (1 May 2019 to 31 December 2019) to an 8-month period after program implementation (1 May 2020 to 31 December 2020). Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences in potential covariates. The primary outcome was total direct cost during the hospital stay for each index hospitalization. This analysis included 6977 patients in 2019 and 5964 patients in 2020. The total direct cost decreased by 3% in 2020 but was not statistically significant (ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.92, 1.03). Under individual categories, there was a significant decrease in medical oncology (ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.50, 0.68) and pharmacy costs (ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.79, 0.96), and an increase in room and board (ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.01, 1.10). In subgroup analysis, ICU patients had a significant reduction in total direct cost after program implementation (ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.72, 0.94). After accounting for the length of ICU admission, we found that the total direct cost per hospital day was no longer different between 2019 and 2020 (ratio 0.986, 95% CI 0.92, 1.05), suggesting that shorter ICU admissions likely explained much of the observed cost savings. This study provides real-world data on how "in-the-moment" GOC conversations may contribute to reduced hospitalization costs among ICU patients.

Perspectives of Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome on Patient-Clinician Communication About Prognosis and the Future

Background

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) experience unpredictable disease trajectories and high prognostic uncertainty, which serve as barriers to patient-clinician communication about prognosis and their values and preferences for the future in the event of worsening health. Little is known about patients' day-to-day lived experiences and how this shapes their willingness to engage in such conversations.

Objectives

To explore participant perspectives on living with their illness and patient-clinician communication about prognosis and the future.

Design

This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

Setting/Subjects

Patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML and high-risk MDS from a northeastern U.S. cancer center.

Data Collection

Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to generate findings.

Results

Of the 14 participants, the mean age was 66 years, 79% were men, 93% were White, married, and had AML. The overarching theme that describes the experience was "Taking One Day at a Time" in a Fog of Uncertainty. Uncertainty was a universal perception related to the challenges for clinicians to predict prognosis. To cope with uncertainty, most participants tried to focus on the present and maintain normality in everyday life. Participants valued encouragement and positivity in patient-clinician communication, however, the majority were not ready to discuss prognosis and the future in the event of worsening health. Of note, 7 of 14 participants died within three months after the interview.

Conclusions

These data describe a unique perspective of patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS that clinicians could use to enhance communication strategies.

Telehealth serious illness care program for older adults with hematologic malignancies: a single-arm pilot study

ABSTRACT

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) feel shocked and bewildered when diagnosed. Serious illness conversations (SICs) may increase disease understanding and preparations for the future. However, SICs often happen late, in part because of clinician-perceived patient discomfort. Telehealth may promote patient comfort by allowing SICs to take place at home. This study assesses the feasibility and usability of a telehealth-delivered Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) for older adults with AML and MDS. We conducted a single-arm pilot study including 20 older adults with AML and MDS. Feasibility was measured using retention rate, with >80% considered feasible. Usability was measured using telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ; range, 1-7): >5 considered usable. We collected other outcomes including acceptability and disease understanding and conducted post-visit qualitative interviews to elicit feedback. Hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 owing to the pilot nature and small sample size. Retention rate was 95% (19/20); mean TUQ scores were 5.9 (standard deviation [SD], 0.9) and 5.9 (SD, 1.1) for patients and caregivers, respectively. We found the SICP to be acceptable. The majority of patients found the SICP to be very or extremely worthwhile (88.2%; 15/17), and reported it increased closeness with their clinician (75.0%; 12/16). After their visit, patient estimates of curability, and overall life expectancy aligned more closely with those of their clinicians. In qualitative interviews, most patients said that they would recommend this program to others (89.5%, 17/19). This study demonstrated that delivery of the telehealth SICP to older patients with AML and MDS is feasible, usable, and acceptable. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04745676.

Correlates of common concerns in older cancer survivors of leukemia and lymphoma: results from the WHI LILAC study

PURPOSE

Older survivors of leukemia and lymphoma often experience long-term effects of chemotherapy. We described common concerns related to their cancer and treatment in older survivors of leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and assessed correlates of these concerns.

METHODS

We utilized data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Life and Longevity After Cancer (LILAC) study that recruited post-menopausal women aged 50-79. Participants diagnosed with leukemia and NHL were included (n = 420). They were asked about 14 areas of current concerns related to their cancer and treatment and to rate each from 0 (no concern) to 2 (major concern), with total scores ranging from 0 to 28. Linear regression was used to assess factors correlated with the concern score, and logistic regression for factors correlated with the three most common concerns.

RESULTS

Mean age at assessment was 81 years (range 69-99); 72% reported at least one concern, and median concern score among these survivors was 3.5 (Q1-Q3 2-5). Factors significantly correlated with concern scores were sadness, pain, distress, higher prior symptom count, and loneliness (all p < 0.05). Significant factors correlated with common concerns were (1) fatigue/sleep: sadness/depression, distress, higher prior symptom count, greater loneliness, and worse physical functioning; (2) physical functioning/activity: older age, public insurance, higher body mass index, pain, worse QoL, and higher treatment-related comorbidities; (3) memory/concentration: prior chemotherapy or radiation, worse QoL, higher prior symptom count, and greater loneliness (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Almost three-quarters of older survivors of leukemia and lymphoma reported at least one concern; a multifaceted intervention may be needed to address these concerns.

Association of appropriateness for ICU admission with resource use, organ support and long-term survival in critically ill cancer patients

We aimed to evaluate the characteristics, resource use and outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer according to appropriateness of ICU admission. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer admitted to ICU from January 2017 to December 2018. Patients were classified as appropriate, potentially inappropriate, or inappropriate for ICU admission according to the Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were one-year, ICU, and hospital mortality, hospital LOS and utilization of ICU organ support. We used logistic regression and competing risk models accounting for relevant confounders in primary outcome analyses. From 6700 admitted patients, 5803 (86.6%) were classified as appropriate, 683 (10.2%) as potentially inappropriate and 214 (3.2%) as inappropriate for ICU admission. Potentially inappropriate and inappropriate ICU admissions had lower likelihood of being discharged from the ICU than patients with appropriate ICU admission (sHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49-0.61 and sHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.81, respectively), and were associated with higher 1-year mortality (OR 6.39, 95% CI 5.60-7.29 and OR 11.12, 95% CI 8.33-14.83, respectively). Among patients with appropriate, potentially inappropriate, and inappropriate ICU admissions, ICU mortality was 4.8%, 32.6% and 35.0%, and in-hospital mortality was 12.2%, 71.6% and 81.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). Use of organ support was more common and longer among patients with potentially inappropriate ICU admission. The findings of our study suggest that inappropriateness for ICU admission among patients with cancer was associated with higher resource use in ICU and higher one-year mortality among ICU survivors.

Guidelines for goals of care discussions in patients with gynecologic cancer

This article represents a distillation of literature to provide guidance for goals of care discussions with patients who have gynecologic malignancies. As clinicians who provide surgical care, chemotherapy, and targeted therapeutics, gynecologic oncology clinicians are uniquely positioned to form longitudinal relationships with patients that can enable patient-centered decision making. In this review, we describe optimal timing, components, and best practices for goals of care discussions in gynecologic oncology.

End of life in haematology: quality of life predictors - retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Haematology patients are more likely to receive high intensity care near end of life (EOL) than patients with solid malignancy. Previous authors have suggested indicators of quality EOL for haematology patients, based on a solid oncology model. We conducted a retrospective chart review with the objectives of (1) determining our performance on these quality EOL indicators, (2) describing the timing of level of intervention (LOI) discussion and palliative care (PC) consultation prior to death and (3) evaluating whether goals of therapy (GOT), PC consultation and earlier LOI discussion are predictors of quality EOL.

METHODS

We identified patients who died from haematological malignancies between April 2014 and March 2016 (n=319) at four participating McGill University hospitals and performed retrospective chart reviews.

RESULTS

We found that 17% of patients were administered chemotherapy less than 14 days prior to death, 20% of patients were admitted to intensive care, 14% were intubated and 5% were resuscitated less than 30 days prior to death, 18% of patients received blood transfusion less than 7 days prior to death and 67% of patients died in an acute care setting. LOI discussion and PC consultation occurred a median of 22 days (IQR 7-103) and 9 days (IQR 3-19) before death. Patients with non-curative GOT, PC consultation or discussed LOI were significantly less likely to have high intensity EOL outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrate that LOI discussions, PC consults and physician established GOT are associated with quality EOL outcomes for patients with haematological malignancies.

Differential Impact of a Multicomponent Goals-of-Care Program in Patients with Hematologic and Solid Malignancies

We recently reported that an interdisciplinary multicomponent goals-of-care (myGOC) program was associated with an improvement in goals-of-care (GOC) documentation and hospital outcomes; however, it is unclear if the benefit was uniform between patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the change in hospital outcomes and GOC documentation before and after myGOC program implementation between patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. We examined the change in outcomes in consecutive medical inpatients before (May 2019-December 2019) and after (May 2020-December 2020) implementation of the myGOC program. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Secondary outcomes included GOC documentation. In total, 5036 (43.4%) patients with hematologic malignancies and 6563 (56.6%) with solid tumors were included. Patients with hematologic malignancies had no significant change in ICU mortality between 2019 and 2020 (26.4% vs. 28.3%), while patients with solid tumors had a significant reduction (32.6% vs. 18.8%) with a significant between-group difference (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.35, 3.88; p = 0.004). GOC documentation improved significantly in both groups, with greater changes observed in the hematologic group. Despite greater GOC documentation in the hematologic group, ICU mortality only improved in patients with solid tumors.

Elements for assistance to patients with hematological malignancies to propose care lines: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

to identify the elements for assistance to patients with hematological malignancies to propose a care line.

METHODS

this is a scoping review, anchored in the JBI theoretical framework, with searches carried out in April 2021, in eight electronic databases and 10 repositories of theses and dissertations.

RESULTS

the final sample consisted of 93 studies, and the main forms of assistance provided that can support a care line for this public were imaging tests, immunophenotyping, chemotherapy regimens, radiotherapy, infection management, assessment of nutritional status, maintenance of oral function, symptom management and screening for second malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

the elaboration of a care line for onco-hematologic patients is necessary, considering the complexity surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of hematologic malignancies, in addition to the difficulties that are imposed in relation to access and continuity of care in the network.

Advance care planning in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have worse survival rates compared to younger patients, and experience more intense inpatient healthcare at the end of life (EOL) compared to patients with solid tumors. Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to limit aggressive and burdensome care at EOL for patients with AML and MDS. The purpose of this study was to better understand ACP from the perspective of clinicians, older patients with AML and MDS, and their caregivers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 45 study participants. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Open coding and focused content analysis were used to organize data and develop and contextualize categories and subcategories.

RESULTS

Guided by our specific aims, we developed four themes: (1) The language of ACP and medical order for life-sustaining treatment (MOLST) does not resonate with patients, (2) There is no uniform consensus on when ACP is currently happening, (3) Oncology clinician-perceived barriers to ACP (e.g., patient discomfort, patient lack of knowledge, and lack of time), and (4) Patients felt that they are balancing fear and hope when navigating their AML or MDS diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study can be used to develop interventions to promote serious illness conversations for patients with AML and MDS and their caregivers to ensure that patient care aligns with patient values.

Elementos para assistência a pacientes com neoplasias hematológicas para propor linhas de cuidado: scoping review

RESUMO Objetivos: identificar os elementos para assistência a pacientes com neoplasias hematológicas para propor uma linha de cuidado. Métodos: trata-se de uma scoping review, ancorada no referencial teórico do JBI, com buscas realizadas em abril de 2021 em oito bases de dados eletrônicas e 10 repositórios de teses e dissertações. Resultados: a amostra final foi composta por 93 estudos, e as principais formas de assistências prestadas que podem embasar uma linha de cuidado para esse público foram exames de imagem, imunofenotipagem, regimes quimioterápicos, radioterapia, gestão de infecções, avaliação do estado nutricional, manutenção da função oral, gerenciamento de sintomas e rastreio para segundas neoplasias. Conclusões: a elaboração de uma linha de cuidados para pacientes onco-hematológicos se faz necessária, tendo em vista a complexidade que cerca o diagnóstico e tratamento das neoplasias hematológicas, além das dificuldades que se impõem em relação ao acesso e continuidade do cuidado em rede.

End-of-Life Care of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Compared with Aggressive lymphoma in Patients Who Are Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: An Observational Study in a Japanese Community Hospital

Background

Patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) are reported to receive more aggressive care at the end of life (EOL) than patients with solid tumors. However, the reasons behind this occurrence are not fully understood.

Objectives

To examine whether the care at EOL for HMs is mainly because of the disease characteristics or hematologists' attitudes and systems of care, we compared the EOL care of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Design

We retrospectively analyzed the EOL care of patients with AML and DLBCL younger than 80 years who were receiving combination chemotherapy at a city hospital in Japan.

Results

Fifty-nine patients with AML and 65 with DLBCL were included. Those with AML received chemotherapy more often within their last 30 days (48% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) and 14 days (37% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) of life, and consulted the palliative team less frequently (5.3% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). In the last 3 years, the mortality rate in hematological wards decreased from 74% to 29% in the DLBCL group, but only from 95% to 90% in the AML group. In multivariate analysis, AML (odds ratio [OR] 0.065) and death before 2018 (OR, 0.077) were significant factors associated with reduced referrals to specialized palliative teams.

Conclusion

Patients with AML tend to have lesser access to specialized palliative care and fewer options for their place of death than those with DLBCL. Detailed EOL care plans are needed for these patients, considering the characteristics of the disease.

Team-Based Hospice Referrals: A Potential Quality Metric for Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to durable responses in patients with lung cancer but may delay transitions to hospice at the end of life (EOL). We aimed to test the association of continuity of care with EOL outcomes in the ICI era.

METHODS

We collected retrospective data on all patients with lung cancer who started ICI treatment at a single comprehensive cancer center in the United States (1/1/14-5/1/18) and subsequently died. We defined a hospice referral as having continuity of care if placed by a provider from the patient's multidisciplinary cancer team (e.g., a medical oncologist, palliative care specialist, intensivist, and hospitalist).

RESULTS

In this cohort of 143 patients, 58% had a team-based hospice referral which was associated with a lower risk of death in the hospital. The most common reason patients declined hospice at EOL was an unwillingness to discontinue cancer-directed therapy. As compared to a similar historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone (2008-2010), there was a similar rate of hospice referral (68% vs 74%) but higher rates of new systemic therapy initiated within 30 days of death (17% vs 6%, p .001) and last dose within 14 days of death (13% vs 5%, p .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should test the continuity of care at EOL as a new quality metric for advanced NSCLC.

Sequencing therapy in relapsed DLBCL

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy worldwide, comprising approximately 30% of all lymphomas. Currently, 50% to 60% of patients diagnosed with DLBCL are alive at 5 years and cured with modern therapy, but about 10% to 15% of patients are refractory to first-line therapy, and an additional 20% to 30% relapse following a complete response. Patients who have relapses beyond 2 years may experience more favorable outcomes and have forms of DLBCL that can be distinguished biologically. Patients who experience early relapse or who have primary refractory disease (less than a complete response or relapse within 3 to 6 months of initial therapy) have worse outcomes. For decades, the standard of care treatment strategy for fit patients with relapsed DLBCL has been salvage therapy with non-cross-resistant combination chemoimmunotherapy regimens followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as stem cell rescue for patients with chemosensitive disease. Recent data suggest that certain patients may benefit from chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) in the second-line setting. Additional novel therapies exist for patients who are ineligible, who are unable to access these therapies, or who fail ASCT and/or CAR T. Despite the advent of new therapies for DLBCL and improved outcomes, DLBCL remains a life-threatening illness. Thus, it is essential for clinicians to engage in serious illness conversations with their patients. Goals-of-care communication can be improved through skills-based training and has been demonstrated to have an impact on patient experiences.

A qualitative study exploring challenges and solutions to negotiating goals of care at the end of life in hospital settings

BACKGROUND

Negotiating goals of care (GoC) with patients is an essential skill for all health-care professionals (HCPs) in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth-funded project that delivers free, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, online education and practice change resources. To date, around 26 000 doctors, nurses and allied health professionals have registered to access the education. 'Planning End-of-Life Care-Goals of Care' features in the suite of EOLE modules and includes education around negotiating GoC with patients and families.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to explore the views of module learners (HCPs) on challenges they have faced when negotiating GoC at the EOL with patients and families.

METHODS

Participants were learners (HCPs) who registered to the EOLE website and engaged with the GoC module. Learners' responses to the question posed at the end of the module 'What are the hardest or most challenging things about negotiating GoC with patients and families?' were extracted for a 12-month period. Qualitative data were analysed thematically in NVivo V.12, guided by the theoretical framework of pragmatism. An open, inductive approach was used to code the data, with axial coding used to refine and organize themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

A total of 451 learner statements were analysed. Five themes emerged from the data: (i) differing views and opinions; (ii) challenges to understanding; (iii) managing emotions; (iv) initiating the EOL conversation and (v) lack of professional knowledge or capacity. Five subthemes were also organized under the theme 'differing views and opinions'.

CONCLUSION

Planning EOL care demands high-level, compassionately skilful and sensitive care and services, which are in line with the patient's and family's wishes. In practice, however, there are many challenges to this, such as ensuring that patients, families, and HCPs are aware of different expectations regarding future health-care possibilities, and that HCPs are prepared for negotiating GoC to achieve quality and safe EOL care in hospitals.

Goals of care documentation by medical oncologists and oncology patient end-of-life care outcomes

BACKGROUND

Goals of care (GOC) documentation is important but underused. We aimed to improve oncologist GOC documentation and end-of-life (EOL) care.

METHODS

In April 2020, our cancer center launched a GOC note template, including optional fields for documenting discussion with the patient about: cancer natural history, goals, and/or EOL (resuscitation preferences, hospice receptivity). Associations between GOC notes and EOL care were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 1721 patients dying between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021, median days from first GOC note (± with documentation of EOL discussion) to death was 92, whereas a GOC note including EOL discussion ("GOC EOL note"), specifically, was 31. Patients with a first GOC note >60 days before death spent fewer days inpatient (6.7 vs 10.6 days, p < .001). Among patients with GOC EOL notes, those with such documentation >30 days before death had fewer inpatient (5 vs 11, p < .001) and intensive care unit days (0.5 vs 1.5, p < .001), more hospice referrals (57% vs 44%, p = .003), and less chemotherapy ≤14 days before death (6% vs 11%, p = .010). Of 925 admissions of patients dying within ≤30 days, those with GOC EOL notes were shorter (7 vs 9 days, p = .013) but not associated with more hospice discharge (30% vs 25%, p = .163). Oncologist (vs nononcologist) GOC documentation and earlier documentation of EOL discussion were associated in subset analyses with less inpatient care and more hospice referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Documentation of GOC, including EOL discussions, is associated with favorable performance on accepted indicators of quality EOL care.

Randomized controlled trial of geriatric consultation versus standard care in older adults with hematologic malignancies

We conducted a randomized controlled trial in older adults with hematologic malignancies to determine the impact of geriatrician consultation embedded in our oncology clinic alongside standard care. From February 2015 to May 2018, transplant-ineligible patients aged ≥75 years who presented for initial consultation for lymphoma, leukemia, or multiple myeloma at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA) were eligible. Pre-frail and frail patients, classified based on phenotypic and deficit-accumulation approaches, were randomized to receive either standard oncologic care with or without consultation with a geriatrician. The primary outcome was 1-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included unplanned care utilization within 6 months of follow-up and documented end-of-life (EOL) goals-of-care discussions. Clinicians were surveyed as to their impressions of geriatric consultation. One hundred sixty patients were randomized to either geriatric consultation plus standard care (n=60) or standard care alone (n=100). The median age of the patients was 80.4 years (standard deviation = 4.2). Of those randomized to geriatric consultation, 48 (80%) completed at least one visit with a geriatrician. Consultation did not improve survival at 1 year compared to standard care (difference: 2.9%, 95% confidence interval: -9.5% to 15.2%, P=0.65), and did not significantly reduce the incidence of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or days in hospital. Consultation did improve the odds of having EOL goals-of-care discussions (odds ratio = 3.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 9.41) and was valued by surveyed hematologic-oncology clinicians, with 62.9%-88.2% of them rating consultation as useful in the management of several geriatric domains.

Goals of care communication and higher-value care for patients with advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review of the evidence

CONTEXT

Goals-of-care communication (GOCC) is recommended to increase the value of cancer care near the end of life (EOL).

OBJECTIVES

Conduct a systematic review of the evidence that GOCC is associated with higher-value care.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMB Reviews, CINAHL, and PsycInfo from inception to July 2019. We analyzed the population,design, and results and the authors' definitions of GOCC. Risk of bias was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were selected. Ten articles reported results from 8 interventions; 17 characterized participants' perspectives; and 5 were retrospective The topics, behaviors, timing, and anticipated outcomes of GOCC varied significantly and were indistinguishable from practices such as advance care planning. GOCC typically focused on treatment outcomes rather than patients' goals. Four of 5 interventions increased evidence of GOCC after clinician training. Only one reported improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

No consensus exists about what GOCC entails. There is limited evidence that GOCC increases the value of EOL care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Future studies should focus on how to engage patients in conversations about their personal goals and integrate their goals into care planning. Clinicians can encourage GOCC by explaining how patients' goals influence decisions especially as treatment options become limited.

Early Palliative Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background: Several novel targeted therapies seem to improve the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Nonetheless, the 5-year survival rate remains below 40%, and the trajectory of the disease remains physically and emotionally challenging, with little time to make relevant decisions. For patients with advanced solid tumors, the integration of early palliative care (EPC) with standard oncologic care a few weeks after diagnosis has demonstrated several benefits. However, this model is underutilized in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: In this article, we analyze the palliative care (PC) needs of AML patients, examine the operational aspects of an integrated model, and review the evidence in favor of EPC integration in the AML course. Results: AML patients have a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms and high use of avoidant coping strategies. Emerging studies, including a phase III randomized controlled trial, have reported that EPC is feasible for inpatients and outpatients, improves quality of life (QoL), promotes adaptive coping, reduces psychological symptoms, and enhances the quality of end-of-life care. Conclusions: EPC should become the new standard of care for AML patients. However, this raises issues about the urgent development of adequate programs of education to increase timely access to PC.

Early palliative/supportive care in acute myeloid leukaemia allows low aggression end-of-life interventions: observational outpatient study

OBJECTIVES

Early palliative supportive care has been associated with many advantages in patients with advanced cancer. However, this model is underutilised in patients with haematological malignancies. We investigated the presence and described the frequency of quality indicators for palliative care and end-of-life care in a cohort of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia receiving early palliative supportive care.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective study based on 215 patients consecutively enrolled at a haematology early palliative supportive care clinic in Modena, Italy. Comprehensive hospital chart reviews were performed to abstract the presence of well-established quality indicators for palliative care and for aggressiveness of care near the end of life.

RESULTS

131 patients received a full early palliative supportive care intervention. All patients had at least one and 67 (51%) patients had four or more quality indicators for palliative care. Only 2.7% of them received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. None underwent intubation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation and was admitted to intensive care unit during the last month of life. Only 4% had either multiple hospitalisations or two or more emergency department access. Approximately half of them died at home or in a hospice. More than 40% did not receive transfusions within 7 days of death. The remaining 84 patients, considered late referrals to palliative care, demonstrated sensibly lower frequencies of the same indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia receiving early palliative supportive care demonstrated high frequency of quality indicators for palliative care and low rates of treatment aggressiveness at the end of life.

End-of-Life Care for Older Adults with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) commonly affects older adults and is often treated with intensive therapies. Receipt of intensive therapies and absence of a clear transition between the curative and palliative phases of treatment yield prognostic uncertainty and risk for poor end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. However, data regarding the EOL outcomes of this population are lacking. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults ≥65 years with aggressive NHL treated with systemic therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital from April 2000 to July 2020 who subsequently died. We abstracted patient and clinical characteristics and EOL outcomes from the medical record. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined factors associated with hospitalization within 30 days of death and hospice utilization. Results: Among 91 patients (median age = 75 years; 37.4% female), 70.3% (64/91) were hospitalized, 34.1% (31/91) received systemic therapy, and 23.3% (21/90) had an intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death. The rates of palliative care consultation and hospice utilization were 47.7% (42/88) and 39.8% (35/88), respectively. More than half of patients (51.6%, 47/91) died in a hospital or health care facility. In multivariable analysis, elevated lactic acid dehydrogenase was associated with risk of hospitalization within 30 days of death (odds ratio [OR] 3.61, p = 0.014). Palliative care consultation (OR 4.45, p = 0.005) was associated with a greater likelihood of hospice utilization, whereas hypoalbuminemia (OR 0.29, p = 0.026) was associated with a lower likelihood of hospice utilization. Conclusions: Older adults with aggressive NHL often experience high health care utilization and infrequently utilize hospice care at the EOL. Our findings underscore the need for interventions to optimize the quality of EOL care for this population.

Portable Medical Orders and End of Life Measures in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Patients with AML or MDS often receive high-intensity care near EOL, including admission to the hospital/ICU and life-sustaining treatments.

Completion of a portable medical order form >30 days before death was associated with lower intensity care near the end of life.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) experience high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital death at the end of life. Early goals-of-care (GOC) discussions may reduce the intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care. Portable Medical Order forms, known as Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) forms in New York state, assist patients in translating GOC discussions into specific medical orders that communicate their wishes during a medical emergency. To determine whether the timing of completion of a MOLST form is associated with EOL care in patients with AML or MDS, we conducted a retrospective study of 358 adult patients with AML or MDS treated at a single academic center and its affiliated sites, who died during a 5-year period. One-third of patients completed at least 1 MOLST form >30 days before death. Compared with patients who completed a MOLST form within 30 days of death or never, those who completed a MOLST form >30 days before death were less likely to receive transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.39; P < .01), chemotherapy (AOR, 0.24; P < .01), or life-sustaining treatments (AOR, 0.21; P < .01) or to be admitted to the ICU (AOR, 0.21; P < .01) at EOL. They were also more likely to use hospice services (AOR, 2.72; P < .01). Earlier MOLST form completion was associated with lower intensity of care near EOL in patients with MDS or AML.

Goals of care discussions: perceptions of radiation and medical oncologists

BACKGROUND

Goals of care discussions (GOCD) are essential when counseling patients with cancer. Respective roles of radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO) in GOCD can be unclear. This study aims to clarify the dynamics and barriers to GOCD.

METHODS

Five hundred and fifty-four ROs and 1604 MOs at NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers were sent an anonymous electronic survey regarding demographics, opinions, training in GOCD, GOCD frequency, and three vignettes. Response formats were Yes/No, Likert-type, and free response. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed. Likert-type scores were reported as median [interquartile range].

RESULTS

There were 76 (13.7%) RO and 153 (9.5%) MO who completed surveys. Sixty-three percent of RO and 66% of MO reported GOCD with > 50% of patients (p = 0.90). GOCD were initiated for declining performance status (74%) and poor life expectancy (69%). More MO (42%) received formal GOCD training compared to RO (18%) (p < 0.01). MO were more comfortable conducting GOCD than RO (p < 0.01). RO-conducted GOCD were rated to be less important by MO compared to RO (p < 0.05). Thirty-six percent of MO reported being "not at all" or "somewhat" comfortable with RO-conducted GOCD. RO-initiated GOCD with new patients were rated less appropriate by RO compared to MO perceptions of RO-initiated GOCD (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While MO and RO conduct GOCD with similar frequency, MO are more comfortable conducting GOCD and are more likely to have formal training. MO rate importance of RO involvement lower than RO. Further research is needed to understand interdisciplinary dynamics that may impact GOCD and subsequent patient care outcomes.

Goal of a "Good Death" in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Hematologic Malignancies-Are We Close?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The medical field has a critical role not only in prolonging life but also in helping patients achieve a good death. Early studies assessing end-of-life quality indicators to capture if a good death occurred demonstrated low rates of hospice use and high rates of intensive healthcare utilization near death among patients with hematologic malignancies, raising concerns about the quality of death. In this review, we examine trends in end-of-life care for patients with hematologic malignancies to determine if we are close to the goal of a good death.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several cohort studies show that patients with blood cancers are often inadequately prepared for the dying process due to late goals of care discussions and they experience low rates of palliative and hospice care. More recent analyses of population-based data demonstrate some improvements over time, with significantly more patients receiving palliative care, enrolling in hospice, and having the opportunity to die at home compared to a decade ago. These encouraging trends are paradoxically accompanied by concomitant increases in late hospice enrollment and intensive healthcare utilization near death. Although we are closer to the goal of a good death for patients with hematologic malignancies, there is ample room for growth. To close the gap between the current state of care and a good death, we need research that engages patients, caregivers, hematologic oncologists, and policy-makers to develop innovative interventions that improve timeliness of goals of care discussions, expand palliative care integration, and increase hospice use.

End-of-Life Practice Patterns in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

Despite the importance of symptom management and end-of-life (EOL) care in head and neck cancers (HNC), there is little literature on care practices in this population. This study examines EOL care practice patterns using nationally established metrics.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Review of HNC patients who were actively followed and treated (defined as one clinic note within 90 days, two within preceding 9 months, and having received treatment at our institution) and died between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. The cohort was reviewed for performance on Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI®) and other metrics.

RESULTS

Of 133 patients identified, 52 met inclusion criteria. The average age at death was 69.8 years. About 59% had distant metastases, 30% had locoregional disease, 11% were undergoing primary treatment. Twenty-three percentage received chemotherapy within the last 14 days of life. Fifty percentage of patients were admitted in the last 30 days of life, and 33% died in the hospital. Fifty-four percentage of patients had either Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment or Advanced Directive on file. Eighty-one percentage of patients had any type of goals of care discussion documented. Sixty-five percentage of all patients received referrals to palliative care and 46% of all patients enrolled in hospice. The median days in hospice was 12. Having a goals of care discussion was significantly associated with utilization of palliative and hospice care.

CONCLUSIONS

Provider-documented goals of care discussions were strongly correlated to referrals and enrollment in palliative and hospice care. Areas for improvement include better documentation of treatment directives and reducing low-utility treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:1769-1773, 2021.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent

The Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) is a standardized instrument to assess the overall cancer patient experience. This study retrospectively investigated differences in care experiences and satisfaction among ambulatory oncology patients who self-identified as receiving outpatient therapies for curative intent or for symptom or disease control. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the AOPSS collected between February and April 2019 within the provincial cancer program in Alberta, Canada. There were 2104 participants who returned the survey, representing a 52.7% response rate. This nationally validated survey gathers patient care experiences and satisfaction across six domains of person-centred care. Treatment intent was characterized by adding a new “goal of treatment” question. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs). Cancer patients’ treatment goals were found to be significantly associated with key patient characteristics like age, sex, tumour group, and the locations where they received care. Patients whose self-identified goal of treatment was to cure their cancer reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction and a more positive experience in five out of the six person-centred care domains. Results identify marked differences in satisfaction and experience between these two patient groups even though they both received care in the same ambulatory environments. A better understanding of the experience and satisfaction of non-curative cancer patients could allow for a more holistic and supportive approach to patient care. In addition, an early palliative approach to care is recommended for improved patient outcomes.

Strategies for introducing palliative care in the management of relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphomas

Recent advances in treatment of patients with aggressive lymphomas ranging from chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to combination of antibody-drug conjugates with chemotherapy have improved survival outcomes. Despite these significant advances, patients with relapsed or refractory disease experience high physical and psychological symptom burden, and a substantial proportion still die of their lymphoma. In addition, end-of-life care outcomes are suboptimal with high rates of intensive end-of-life health care use and low rates of timely hospice enrollment. Integrating palliative care concurrently with disease-directed care for this patient population has strong potential to improve their symptom burden, quality of life, and end-of-life care. Multiple factors, including heightened prognostic uncertainty in the setting of relapsed/refractory disease, pose challenges to timely provision of palliative care. This article reviews benefits of primary and specialty palliative care for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas and barriers to such care. It also highlights strategies for effectively integrating palliative care for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas.

[Study of representations of end-of-life platelet transfusion by its protagonists: Patients, nurses and hematologic oncologists]

INTRODUCTION

End-of-life platelet transfusion practice in onco-hematology is subjective and depends on representations shared by patients, nurses and hematologists. This study aims to describe these representations of platelet transfusion in a context of a severe and advanced hematologic malignancy through the social representation of its protagonists.

METHODS

A qualitative study, using the associative network method and including three groups of 15 participants (patients with an advanced hematologic malignancy, regularly transfused in platelet concentrates; nurses and hematologic oncologists) from four hematology centers was conducted between February and April 2019. Analysis was carried out using IraMuTeQ software.

RESULTS

Patients expect platelet transfusion to have a direct beneficial impact on their health and highlight human relations. Nurses aim at the patient's well-being, in his or her individuality, and at respecting the transfusion protocol. Physicians seek to relieve symptoms by taking into account a multitude of decision-making factors. The textual clustering method, nuances those previous results and individualizes four different orientations, independent of groups: dependency, singularity, subjectivity and neutrality.

DISCUSSION

The perception of the social representations related to platelet transfusion at the end-of-life should make it possible to adapt the discourse to the preferred orientation of the speaker and could be an asset in goals of care discussion with patients as well as with teams in charge of palliative care.

Marital status impacts survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based, propensity-matched study

Background

Marital status has been considered as an independent prognostic factor for various types of cancer survival. The objectives of our study were to investigate the function of marital status on the survival of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients.

Methods

The patients diagnosed with UTUC between 1988 and 2015 were captured within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were classified into married, divorced/separated, widowed and single cohorts. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the effects of marital status on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A 1:1 matched‐pair analysis was performed to optimize the final statistical results by propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Among the 10,852 eligible patients, the percentage of married, divorced/separated, widowed and single patients accounted for 58.2% (6,321), 9.0% (980), 23.3% (2,526) and 9.4% (1,025) respectively. The widowed patients had the worst OS and CSS. Marital status was a predictive factor for OS and CSS of UTUC patients. The results of multivariate Cox regression showed that the worst OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–1.49, P<0.001] and the poorer CSS (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.22–1.43, P<0.001) were existed in the widowed patients, compared with married patients. The results of the stratified analysis by primary site also indicated the same conclusion. Furthermore, the results were confirmed in the 1:1 matched group.

Conclusions

Marital status acted as an independent prognostic and protective factor for survival in UTUC patients. Additionally, being widowed was related with a high risk of death in UTUC compared with married, divorced, or single patients.

Patients with haematological malignancies should not have to choose between transfusions and hospice care

Hospice programmes are important for providing end-of-life care to patients with life-limiting illnesses. Hospice enrolment improves quality of life for patients with advanced cancer and reduces the risk of depression for caregivers. Despite the clear benefits of hospice care, patients with haematological malignancies have the lowest rates of enrolment among patients with any tumour subtype. Furthermore, when patients with haematological disorders do enrol into hospice care, they are more likely to do so within 3 days of death than are patients with non-haematological malignancies. Although reasons for low and late hospice use in this population are multifactorial, a key barrier is limited access to blood transfusions in hospice programmes. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the relationship between transfusion dependence and hospice use for patients with blood cancers. We suggest that rather than constraining patients into either transfusion or hospice models, policies that promote combining palliative transfusions with hospice services are likely to optimise end-of-life care for patients with haematological malignancies.