Isolated progression of metastatic lung cancer: Clinical outcomes associated with definitive radiotherapy

Oligo-residual disease in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: incidence, pattern of failure, and clinical value of local consolidative therapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and potential clinical value of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-treated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-treated metastatic NSCLC patients with measurable disease in three academic centers were screened and those with adequate follow-up were included. Oligo-residual disease (ORD) was defined as residual tumors limited to three organs and five lesions evaluated at the best response among patients with partial response or stable disease after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Oligometastatic and multiple-metastatic disease (OMD/MMD) were similarly classified at baseline. Locoregional interventions, administered after effective treatment of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and before initial disease progression, were defined as LCT. Patterns of initial progressive disease (PD) were classified as involving only residual sites (RP), only new sites (NP), or a combination of both (BP).

RESULTS

Among the 698 patients included, ORD was documented in 73 (47.1%) of 155 patients with baseline OMD and 60 (11.0%) of 543 patients with baseline MMD. With a median follow-up of 31.0 (range, 6.0-53.0) months, 108 patients with ORD developed initial PD, with RP, NP, and BP occurring in 51 (47%), 23 (21.3%), and 34 (31.5%), respectively. Among the 133 patients with ORD, those receiving LCT (n = 43) had longer progression-free survival (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.85, p = 0.01) and overall survival (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.79, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ORD occurs with a clinically relevant frequency among PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-treated metastatic NSCLC patients and LCT may provide extra survival benefits in those with ORD.

Patterns of Failure, Low-Volume Relapse, and Subsequent Ablative Management in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation and Consolidation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of failure, frequency of low-volume relapse (LVR), and candidacy for ablative therapy at time of disease progression (PD) after chemoradiation and consolidative immunotherapy (CRT + ICI) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 229 consecutive patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with CRT + ICI between October 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution. PD was classified as isolated locoregional failure (LRF), isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF. Any LRF was subclassified as in-field failure, marginal failure, or out-of-field failure. LVR was defined as 3 or fewer sites of PD in any number of organs. Ablative candidates were defined as having 5 or fewer sites of PD radiographically amenable to high-dose radiation or surgery. Time-to-event data were calculated using cumulative incidence analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to examine the correlations between characteristics of relapse and postprogression survival.

RESULTS

Of the 229 patients, 119 (52%) had PD. Of these 119 patients, 20 (21%) had isolated LRF, 28 (24%) had synchronous LRF + DF, and 71 (60%) had isolated DF. Of the 48 patients with any LRF, 28 (58%) had in-field failure, 10 (21%) marginal failure, and 10 (21%) out-of-field failure. The cumulative incidence of LRF and DF was 13% (95% CI, 9.2%-18%) and 32% (95% CI, 26%-38%) at 1 year and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%) and 39% (95% CI, 33%-46%) at 2 years, respectively. Overall, 64 patients (54%) were considered to have LVR. At time of PD, 60 patients (50%) were eligible for ablative therapy. Patients with LVR had longer median survival versus with high-volume relapse (37.4 vs 15.2 months, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, LVR (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.56; P < .001) was associated with improved postprogression survival.

CONCLUSIONS

After CRT + ICI, approximately half of patients experience LVR at time of PD and are candidates for ablative therapies. Prospective trials are needed to validate the optimal treatment strategy for LVR.

Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete.

FINDINGS

From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts.

INTERPRETATION

The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute.

Patterns of Failure in Metastatic NSCLC Treated With First Line Pembrolizumab and Use of Local Therapy in Patients With Oligoprogression

INTRODUCTION

The patterns of failure (POF) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy are not well established.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mNSCLC that received first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at a single academic center from 2015 to 2021. We defined POF with 2 classifications: 1) local, regional, or distant failure, or 2) failure in existing lesions, new lesions, or a combination. Oligoprogression was defined as disease progression (PD) in ≤3 sites of failure. Overall survival (OS) was measured via Kaplan-Meier and modelled with Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 298 patients identified, 198 had PD. Using POF classification 1, most failures were distant (43.9%) or a combination of locoregional and distant (34.4%). For POF classification 2, failures occurred in a combination of new and existing lesions (45.0%), existing lesions alone (33.3%), or in new lesions only (21.7%). Oligoprogression occurred in 39.9% (n = 79) cases. Median OS was higher in the following: PD in existing lesions vs. new or new + existing lesions (28.7 vs. 20.2 vs. 13.9 months, P < .001) and oligoprogression vs. polyprogression (35.1 vs. 12.2 months, P < .001). In oligoprogression, median OS was better for those who received radiation to all sites of PD (62.2 months) than for those who changed systemic therapy (22.9 months, P = .007). On multivariable analysis, radiation for oligoprogression (HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62, P < .001) was associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab, oligoprogression is relatively common. Randomized data are needed to define the benefits of radiation in oligoprogressive mNSCLC.

The Emerging Role of Radiotherapy in Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Oligoprogressive disease (OPD) is an emerging concept that describes patients who have progression of disease in a limited number of metastatic sites while on systemic therapy. Growing evidence has suggested the integration of local ablative therapy with systemic agents in patients with OPD further improves survival. In oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy may have an important role in the effective local control of selective progressing metastases, which may translate to better patient outcomes. This review explores the treatment paradigm of this subset of patients and provides an update on the current existing literature on this topic.

Is stereotactic body radiotherapy an effective treatment in metastatic lung cancer with oligoprogressive disease?

BACKGROUND

Oligoprogression (OPD) is defined as a condition where limited progression (1-3 metastases) is observed in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment. In this study we investigated the impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with OPD from metastatic lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a cohort of consecutive patients with SBRT treated between June 2015 and August 2021 were collected. All extracranial metastatic sites of OPD from lung cancer were included. Dose regimens consisted of mainly 24 in 2 fractions, 30-51 Gy in 3 fractions, 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions, 52.5 Gy in 7 fractions and 44-56 Gy in 8 fractions. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC), and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) from the start date of SBRT to the event.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients, 34 female and 29 males were included. Median age was 75 years (range 25-83). All patients received concurrent systemic treatment before the start of the SBRT: 19 chemotherapy (CT), 26 CT plus immunotherapy (IT) or Tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) and 18 IT/TKI. SBRT was delivered to the lung (n = 29), mediastinal node (n = 9), bone (n = 7), adrenal gland (n = 19), other visceral metastases (1) and other node metastases (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 17 months, median OS was 23 months. LC was 93% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. DFS was 7 months. According to our results, there was no statistically significant correlation between prognostic factors and OS after SBRT in OPD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Median DFS was 7 months, translating into the continuation of effective systemic treatment as other metastases grow slowly. In patients with oligoprogression disease, SBRT is a valid and efficient treatment that may enable postponing the switch of systemic line.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2 Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the paucity of prospective evidence, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is increasingly being considered in the setting of oligoprogression to delay the need to change systemic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy, and overall survival (OS) after SRT to oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) lesions in patients who are on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective multicenter study was performed to evaluate the use of SRT in oligoprogressive mRCC patients. Patients with mRCC who had previous stability or response after ≥3 mo of TKI therapy were eligible if they developed progression of five of fewer metastases. Thirty-seven patients with 57 oligoprogressive tumors were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Oligoprogressive tumors were treated with SRT, and the same TKI therapy was continued afterward.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Competing risk analyses and the Kaplan-Meir methodology were used to report the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median duration of TKI therapy prior to study entry was 18.6 mo; 1-yr LC of the irradiated tumors was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-98%). The median PFS after SRT was 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.5-15.7 mo). The cumulative incidence of changing systemic therapy was 47% (95% CI 32-68%) at 1 yr, with a median time to change in systemic therapy of 12.6 mo (95% CI 9.6-17.4 mo). One-year OS was 92% (95% CI 82-100%). There were no grade 3-5 SRT-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

LC of irradiated oligoprogressive mRCC tumors was high, and the need to change systemic therapy was delayed for a median of >1 yr.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The use of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic kidney cancer patients, who develop growth of a few tumors while on oral targeted therapy, can significantly delay the need to change to the next line of drug therapy.

Oligoprogression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Several retrospective studies present evidence of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations such as EGFR. The strategy of local ablative therapy (LAT) with radiotherapy, followed by the continuation of the same anticancer drug therapy beyond progression disease, is recommended in the current NCCN guideline. Although evidence of the use of this strategy in the treatment of the driver mutation-negative NSCLC is missing, LAT with radiotherapy for OPD after combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor with cytotoxic chemotherapy is expected. Tumors outside of the radiation field may further respond to the immune checkpoint inhibitors due to an abscopal effect. In the future, to achieve long-term survival in advanced NSCLC, it will be important to validate this treatment strategy via prospective comparative studies and to actively implement it in clinical practice.

Abstract

We reviewed the literature on oligoprogressive disease (OPD) and local ablative therapy (LAT) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The frequency of OPD varies depending on its definition and is estimated to be between 15–47%. The implications of the strategy of continuing the same anticancer agents beyond progressive disease after LAT with radiation therapy for OPD are based on the concept of progression in which only a small number of lesions, not more than about four, proliferate after chemotherapy. In the case of OPD harboring driver mutations such as EGFR, prospective studies are underway. However, evidence from retrospective studies support this strategy, which is currently recommended in some guidelines. The prognosis in OPD cases during the administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is relatively promising. Additionally, LAT with radiation for OPD after the first-line treatment of ICI with cytotoxic chemotherapy may overcome the resistance to the combination drug therapy due to an abscopal effect. To achieve long-term survival in advanced-stage NSCLC, it is important to verify the optimal method and timing of the therapy through prospective comparative studies as well as patient selection based on patient characteristics and biomarker levels.

Estimating survival and clinical outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with bone-only metastasis using molecular markers

•

Studies about prognostic factors of NSCLC patients with BOM are lacking.

•

Five significant independent prognostic factors for them were found.

•

We developed a GPA model to estimate life expectancy and to guide interventions.

•

The more distal metastases to the spine, the worse the prognosis.

Objectives

This retrospective study investigated prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone-only metastasis, and developed a graded prognostic assessment (GPA) model to estimate patient survival.

Methods

The primary endpoint was overall survival. We investigated the patients with advanced NSCLC with bone-only metastasis at the initial diagnosis and diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 in our hospital. A log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to examine factors. A GPA model was developed in the training set based on the factors that were determined significant according to their hazard ratios and verified by the validation set.

Results

We finally included 220 patients for analysis. These patients were divided into two groups, 147 cases for the training cohort and 73 for the validation cohort. The following were significant independent prognostic factors, and were included in the GPA model: smoking; EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) sensitive/ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) mutations; loss of weight; hypoalbuminemia; and primary site treated by surgery or radiotherapy. GPA score of nil was assigned to smoking, without sensitive mutations, loss of weight, hypoalbuminemia, and without local treatment of primary site; the corresponding superior alternatives were scored 1.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.5, and 1.5, respectively. The median survival times of patients with GPA scores of nil to 3.0, 3.5 to 6.0, and 6.5 to 8.0 were 14.2, 29.5, and 56.6 months in the training set (P < 0.001) and 15.2, 31.2, and 54.0 months in the validation set (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The survival time of patients with NSCLC with bone-only metastasis was dramatically influenced by the presence of the determined prognostic factors. The GPA model developed in this study may be a useful clinical tool to estimate the life expectancy of these patients, and guide treatment.

Late metastatic presentation is associated with improved survival and delayed wide-spread progression after ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic disease (OMD), but the effect of metastasis timing on patient outcomes remains uncertain.

Methods

An international database of patients with OMD treated with SBRT was assembled with rigorous quality assurance. Early versus late metastases were defined as those diagnosed ≤24 versus >24 months from the primary tumor. Overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and incidences of wide‐spread progression (WSP) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models stratified by primary tumor types.

Results

The database consists of 1033 patients with median follow‐up of 24.1 months (0.3–104.7). Late metastatic presentation (N = 427) was associated with improved OS compared to early metastasis (median survival 53.6 vs. 33.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47–0.72, p < 0.0001). Patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, N = 255, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33–0.74, p = 0.0005) and colorectal cancer (N = 235, HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30–0.84, p = 0.008) had better OS if presenting with late metastasis. Late metastasis correlated with longer PFS (median 17.1 vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61–0.83, p < 0.0001) and lower 2‐year incidence of WSP (26.1% vs. 43.6%, HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49–0.74, p < 0.0001). Fewer WSP were observed in patients with NSCLC (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.33–0.83, p = 0.006) and kidney cancer (N = 63, HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14–0.97, p = 0.044) with late metastases. Across cancer types, greater SBRT target size was a significant predictor for worse OS.

Conclusion

Late metastatic presentation is associated with improved survival and delayed progression in patients with OMD treated with SBRT.