A phase II basket trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort

Designing Clinical Trials for Patients With Rare Cancers: Connecting the Zebras

The field of rare cancer research is rapidly transforming, marked by significant progress in clinical trials and treatment strategies. Rare cancers, as defined by the National Cancer Institute, occur in fewer than 150 cases per million people each year, yet they collectively represent a significant portion of all cancer diagnoses. Because of their infrequency, these cancers pose distinct challenges for clinical trials, including limited patient populations, geographical dispersion, and a general lack of awareness of treatment options. Economic limitations further complicate drug development, making initiatives such as the Orphan Drug Act essential for incentivizing research. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and precision medicine has been instrumental in identifying actionable genetic alterations in parallel with an explosion in the development of genomically targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and antibody drug conjugates. Advances in clinical NGS, precision medicine, and tumor-agnostic therapies have become central to the progress in rare cancer research. The development and approval of tumor-agnostic drugs, such as BRAF, NTRK, and RET inhibitors, and immunotherapy for mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high status cancers highlight the potential of personalized treatments across diverse cancer types and across the age spectrum. Collaborative trials from cooperative groups including SWOG DART, ASCO TAPUR, NCI-MATCH, pediatric COG-match, DRUP, IMPRESS, and innovative registrational basket and platform trials (eg, VE-Basket, ROAR, LIBRETTO-001, ARROW), along with patient advocacy group-run trials like TRACK, are enhancing access to clinical trials. In addition, artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the trial matching process. An integrated approach, combining these innovations in collaboration with multiple stakeholders, is crucial for advancing rare cancer research, offering hope for better patient outcomes and quality of life.

Combining anti-PD-1 antibodies with surufatinib for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma: Two cases report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI NEC) has a low incidence rate and poor prognosis. Most patients already have metastatic disease when they are diagnosed. Platinum chemotherapy is the main means of treating metastatic GI NECs. There is a lack of effective treatment methods after chemotherapy failure. Therefore, Therefore, selecting appropriate posterior-line treatment programs to improve the prognosis of patients is urgently needed.

CASE SUMMARY

A 64-year-old female was diagnosed with stage IV NEC of the rectum due to abdominal pain and rectal bleeding. After multiline chemotherapy, the condition progressed, and the patient was treated with a combination of camrelizumab and surufatinib. The efficacy evaluation revealed partial remission (PR) and stable conditions, with the expression of the tumor marker neuron-specific enolase (NSE) returning to normal. The adverse reactions were controllable, and the overall condition was good, with weight gain achieved in the past four years. Another 51-year-old female experienced recurrence and metastasis of a duodenal NEC after surgery. After multiline chemotherapy, she received sintilimab combined with surufatinib. The curative effect fluctuated between PR and stability. During treatment, she recovered from immune-related diabetes and later died due to deterioration of her condition. During the treatment, the patient’s NSE level returned to normal.

CONCLUSION

The combination of antiangiogenic targeted drugs and immunotherapy provides a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of metastatic GI-NECs.

First cycle toxicity and survival in patients with rare cancers treated with checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Associations between immune-related adverse events from checkpoint inhibitor therapy and outcomes have been previously evaluated, with most prior research finding a positive association between toxicity and survival. This prior research has generally reported on more common tumor types. We use a unique data resource of a federally funded basket trial (NCT02834013) for patients with rare cancers (n = 684) to evaluate associations between immune-related adverse events and overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Patients were treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab; the trial was opened at more than 1000 sites. Landmark Cox regression models were used to assess first cycle immune-related adverse event associations with PFS and overall survival.

RESULTS

We found that grade 1-2 treatment-related immune-related adverse events in the first cycle of therapy were associated with longer overall survival (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.75; P < .001) compared with no treatment-related immune-related adverse event, while grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were associated with shorter overall survival (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.90; P = .025). Similar but weaker associations were observed with PFS and grade 1-2 treatment-related immune-related adverse events (HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.01; P = .067) and grade 3-4 (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.78; P = .037) compared with no treatment-related immune-related adverse events. Grade 1-2 dermatologic toxicity was associated with improved overall survival compared with other grade 1-2 toxicities (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.85; P = .002). There was no statistically significant overall survival difference between patients with grade 1-2 fatigue, gastrointestinal, metabolic, hepatic, endocrine, and thyroid toxicities vs other grade 1-2 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients with rare tumors receiving checkpoint inhibitor therapy, grade of immune-related adverse event in the first cycle was predictive for survival.

Activity and Safety of Avelumab in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors and Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Progressive after Chemotherapy (AveNEC Trial)

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms grade 3 (NEN G3) are rare tumors with poor prognosis and no established second-line therapy. The role of immune checkpoint blockade in these aggressive tumors remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The phase II AveNEC study evaluated the effect of avelumab (AVE, 10 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks) in 60 patients with well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (N = 22) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (N = 38) progressing after ≥1 prior chemotherapy (excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer).

RESULTS

The best overall response according to immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) was partial response (PR) in three (5%) and stable disease (SD) in nine (15%) patients, with a disease control rate at 16 weeks of 15% (3 PRs; 6 SDs) and a median duration of response of 4.3 months. Six (10%) patients achieved SD or PR for >6 months and two for >1 year. Response rates were similar regardless of differentiation, Ki-67 expression, or primary localization. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months, and the overall survival was 6.6 months. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, only four (7%) patients were still alive; 1- and 2-year survival rates were 33% and 17%, respectively. Responders had a significantly longer overall survival of 30.2 months compared with 4.8 months in nonresponders. AVE was well tolerated, with few treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events, and the quality of life remained stable during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with progressive high-grade NEN G3, AVE was well tolerated and provided disease control with significant clinical benefit in 15% of heavily pretreated patients.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals tumor heterogeneity in small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma

Small cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (SCNECC) is an aggressive gynecological malignancy with poor prognosis. The precision therapeutic strategies for SCNECC are severely limited by the complex tumor microenvironment. Here, we mapped the single-cell landscape of a total of six samples from matched SCNECC cancerous foci and normal adjacent cervical tissues. Through analysis of 68,455 high-quality cells, malignant epithelial cells were identified with increased neuroendocrine differentiation and reduced keratinization. Within four epithelial cell clusters, the key transcription factors ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1 defined molecular subtypes. Transitional trajectory among subtypes characterized two distinct carcinogenesis pathways in SCNECC. The P-type SCNECC showed potentially enhanced immune infiltration over other subtypes. Intercellular communication analysis identified several immune checkpoints and differentially expressed signaling pathways among subtypes. Through western blotting, the TC-YIK cell line was identified as an N-type SCNECC cell with high expression of SLFN11 and mTOR. Based on immunohistochemical staining of malignant subtyping markers, a cohort of 66 SCNECC patients from our hospital were divided into five subtypes. We further combined YAP1 expression with other clinicopathological factors (Cox p < 0.05) to establish a prognostic nomogram. Overall, these findings provide clues for tumorigenesis, precision treatments and prognostic prediction in SCNECC.

Evolving Immunotherapy Strategies in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is tailored to the tumor's site of origin, grade, and differentiation. NENs are categorized into two main types: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which tend to grow more slowly and are less aggressive, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), which are highly aggressive and harder to treat. Treatment options for NETs range from somatostatin analogues and mTOR inhibitors to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium-177 dotatate. In cases where the disease progresses more rapidly, cytotoxic chemotherapy may also be considered. In contrast, chemotherapy plays a central role in treating NECs, often following protocols similar to those used for small cell lung cancer. Exciting progress is being made in the development of new therapies for NENs. Inspired by the success of immunotherapy in other cancers, clinical trials have begun to explore its potential in NENs. Early findings suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may offer benefits, especially in patients with higher-grade NETs and NECs. However, because NENs have an immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment-meaning they are less likely to trigger an immune response-new strategies are needed to boost ICI efficacy. To overcome this challenge, researchers are exploring innovative approaches, such as combining dual ICIs or pairing ICIs with other therapeutic agents to make the tumors more responsive to immune attack. Moreover, there is growing enthusiasm for cutting-edge therapies designed to enhance the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells. These include bispecific T cell engagers, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, oncolytic viruses, and cancer vaccines. While their effectiveness in NENs is still being studied, these approaches hold considerable promise, offering new hope for patients with this challenging and complex cancer type.

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in metastatic basal cell carcinoma

We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19-50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57-100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3-NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

Novel clinical trial designs emerging from the molecular reclassification of cancer

Next-generation sequencing has revealed the disruptive reality that advanced/metastatic cancers have complex and individually distinct genomic landscapes, necessitating a rethinking of treatment strategies and clinical trial designs. Indeed, the molecular reclassification of cancer suggests that it is the molecular underpinnings of the disease, rather than the tissue of origin, that mostly drives outcomes. Consequently, oncology clinical trials have evolved from standard phase 1, 2, and 3 tissue-specific studies; to tissue-specific, biomarker-driven trials; to tissue-agnostic trials untethered from histology (all drug-centered designs); and, ultimately, to patient-centered, N-of-1 precision medicine studies in which each patient receives a personalized, biomarker-matched therapy/combination of drugs. Innovative technologies beyond genomics, including those that address transcriptomics, immunomics, proteomics, functional impact, epigenetic changes, and metabolomics, are enabling further refinement and customization of therapy. Decentralized studies have the potential to improve access to trials and precision medicine approaches for underserved minorities. Evaluation of real-world data, assessment of patient-reported outcomes, use of registry protocols, interrogation of exceptional responders, and exploitation of synthetic arms have all contributed to personalized therapeutic approaches. With greater than 1 × 1012 potential patterns of genomic alterations and greater than 4.5 million possible three-drug combinations, the deployment of artificial intelligence/machine learning may be necessary for the optimization of individual therapy and, in the near future, also may permit the discovery of new treatments in real time.

A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors SWOG S1609: Vulvar Cancers

PURPOSE

Dual PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition shows promise in various malignancies. The SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial presents initial results of ipilimumab/nivolumab in vulvar cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DART is a prospective/open-label/multicenter (1,016 US sites)/multicohort phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective response rate [ORR; confirmed complete response and partial response (PR)] per RECISTv1.1, whereas progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, clinical benefit rate (CBR; ORR plus stable disease ≥6 months), and toxicity were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Sixteen evaluable patients (median age, 55.5 years; 0-6 prior therapies; no prior immunotherapy) were analyzed, all of whom had squamous cell carcinoma histology. The ORR was 18.8% (3/16), CBR was 25% (4/16), and CBR plus unconfirmed PR rate was 31% (5/16); the PFS was 34.1, 16.7. 15.5, 7.2, and 7.0 months for these five patients, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival were 2.2 and 7.6 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, pruritus, anorexia, and nausea (25%, n = 4 each). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 25% of patients (n = 4). There was one grade 1 to 2 adverse event (6.7%) that led to discontinuation and one (6.7%) grade 5 death adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab in vulvar cancers resulted in an objective response in 3 of 16 patients, all of whom had durable responses lasting over 1 year. Notably, two additional patients experienced durable stable disease and unconfirmed PR. Correlative studies to determine response and resistance markers are ongoing.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: the molecular landscape, therapeutic challenges, and diagnosis and management strategies

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms are a group of diverse, heterogeneous tumours that range from well-differentiated, low-grade neuroendocrine tumours-such as typical and atypical carcinoids-to high-grade, poorly differentiated aggressive malignancies, such as large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). While the incidence of SCLC has decreased, the worldwide incidence of other pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms has been increasing over the past decades. In addition to the standard histopathological classification of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, the introduction of molecular and sequencing techniques has led to new advances in understanding the biology of these diseases and might influence future classifications and staging that can subsequently improve management guidelines in the adjuvant or metastatic settings. Due to the rarity of neuroendocrine neoplasms, there is a paucity of prospective studies that focus on the lungs, especially in rare, well-differentiated carcinoids and LCNECs. In contrast with the success of targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung often only have a few specific targetable gene alterations. Optimal therapy for LCNECs is not well defined and treatment recommendations are based on extrapolating guidelines for the management of patients with SCLC and NSCLC. This Review explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and staging of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms to date. In addition, we focus on the evolving molecular landscape and biomarkers, ranging from tumour phenotypes to functional imaging studies and novel molecular biomarkers. We outline the various clinical outcomes, challenges, the treatment landscape, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions.

SP, Wilkinson KJ, Whitman-Purves EM, Lea J, Schallenkamp JM, Adra N, Appleman LJ, Alden M, Pepin JT, Ellerton JA, Poklepovic A, Walter A, Rampurwala MM, Robinson WR, Kim HS, Chung LIY, McLeod CM, Lopez G, Chen HX, Sharon E, Streicher H, Ryan CW, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. SWOG/NCI Phase II Dual Anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors: Nonepithelial Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

The role of dual checkpoint inhibition (ipilimumab at 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks and nivolumab at 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) in advanced rare/ultrarare nonepithelial ovarian cancers is yet to be explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumor is a prospective, multicenter (1,016 US sites), multicohort, single-arm phase II trial conducted through the Early Therapeutics and Rare Cancer SWOG/NCI Committee, assessing ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4; 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1; 240 mg every 2 weeks) in adults with advanced nonepithelial ovarian cancers who lack beneficial standard therapy. The primary outcome was overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR)/partial response (PR)]; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, clinical benefit rate [stable disease (SD) ≥6 months plus ORR], and toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (median age: 64; number of prior therapies ranged from 0 to 8 with no immunotherapy exposure; eight granulosa, six carcinosarcomas, one Sertoli-Leydig, one yolk sac, and one Wolffian) were evaluated. In granulosa cell tumors, ORR was 25% (n = 2/8; one CR and one PR) and clinical benefit rate was 50% (n = 4/8); PFS was 58.3 (CR), 50.7+ (PR), 30.4 (SD), and 8.7 (SD) months. Median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval, 1.7-11.2 months]; median overall survival was 42.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.1 months-not reached). One Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor showed a 22% regression (PFS, 11.2 months). Carcinosarcomas had no response. Three participants (18%) discontinued treatment due to grade 3 to grade 4 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab-nivolumab shows activity in treatment-refractory granulosa cell tumors, with 25% (n = 2/8) of patients experiencing either CR or PR lasting more than 4 years.

Diagnosis and Management of Parathyroid Carcinoma

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare malignancy, often characterized by the unregulated secretion of parathyroid hormone. The sequelae of severe hypercalcemia together with direct complications from tumor dissemination in patients with advanced disease are usually fatal. Due to its rarity, formal studies to guide the diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma are lacking. However, recent data from case reports, case series, and registry studies suggest the emergence of new and effective treatment approaches for this understudied disease. We reviewed existing literature on the diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma. Our findings suggest that traditional approaches such as surgical resection for both localized and metastatic diseases continue to play an important role in patient management. For patients with unresectable disease, newer systemic treatment approaches, including the use of temozolomide and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, may offer clinical benefit.

Phase II trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors SWOG/NCI experience: invasive mucinous or non-mucinous lepidic adenocarcinoma of the lung (formerly bronchioloalveolar carcinoma)

Background

Anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 antibodies are efficacious in various malignancies.

Objectives

This study presents the first results of ipilimumab-nivolumab in invasive mucinous or non-mucinous lepidic adenocarcinoma (invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) or invasive non-mucinous lepidic adenocarcinomas (INLA), respectively) of the lung.

Design

Dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) is a prospective, open-label, multicenter (1016 US sites), multi-cohort phase II trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg IV every 2 weeks).

Methods

Participants histologically diagnosed with advanced IMA or INLA, who had not responded to at least one line of therapy, were included in the bronchioloalveolar carcinoma cohort. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (confirmed complete and partial responses (CR and PR)). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease (SD) ⩾ 6 months plus ORR), and toxicity.

Results

Eight evaluable patients (median age: 77 years; the number of prior therapies ranged from 0 to 4; one patient with prior exposure to a PD-1 inhibitor; comprising six IMA and two INLA) were treated. One IMA had a 40% regression (PFS 45.2+ months, PD-L1 0%, KRAS G12C mutated, tumor mutational burden [TMB] 13 mut/Mb). One INLA had 66% regression (PFS 23.8 months, PD-L1 unknown, no actionable mutations, TMB 3 mut/Mb). Overall ORR was 25.0% (2/8) and CBR, 62.5% (5/8); PFS for the patients with SD > 6 months was 43.4+, 11.7+, and 8.3 months. The median PFS was 16 months (5.3-not reached) and the median OS was 32.2 months (14.6-not reached). The toxicity profile was similar to previous reports.

Conclusion

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab in the bronchioloalveolar carcinoma cohort (IMA, INLA) resulted in a durable ORR of 25.0% and CBR of 62.5% (PFS, 8.3 11.7+. 23.8 (PR), 43.4+ and 45.2+ (PR) months). Correlative studies to determine response and resistance markers are ongoing. Expanded prospective studies are warranted.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT02834013.

Unraveling the mysteries of MGMT: Implications for neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells and are commonly found in various organs. A considerable proportion of NET patients were diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage. Alkylating agents are the primary treatment for NET, and O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) remains the first-line of defense against DNA damage caused by these agents. Clinical trials have indicated that MGMT promoter methylation or its low/lacked expression can predict a favorable outcome with Temozolomide in NETs. Its status could help select NET patients who can benefit from alkylating agents. Therefore, MGMT status serves as a biomarker to guide decisions on the efficacy of Temozolomide as a personalized treatment option. Additionally, delving into the regulatory mechanisms of MGMT status can lead to the development of MGMT-targeted therapies, benefiting individuals with high levels of MGMT expression. This review aims to explore the polymorphism of MGMT regulation and summarize its clinical implications in NETs, which would help establish the role of MGMT as a biomarker and its potential as a therapeutic target in NETs. Additionally, we explore the benefits of combining Temozolomide and immunotherapy in MGMT hypermethylated subgroups. Future studies can focus on optimizing Temozolomide administration to induce specific immunomodulatory changes.

Phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: the desmoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Dual inhibition using anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitors has proven effective in many cancers. However, its efficacy in rare solid cancers remains unclear. Desmoid tumors are ultrarare soft-tissue tumors, traditionally treated with surgery. This study reviews the first results of using ipilimumab and nivolumab in the desmoid tumor cohort of the SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial.

METHODS

DART is a prospective/open-label/multicenter (1,016 US sites)/multicohort phase II trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) that opened at 1,016 US sites. The primary endpoint included overall response rate (ORR) defined as confirmed complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease (SD) ≥6 months plus CR and PR) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixteen evaluable patients (median age: 37) with desmoid tumors and a median of 1.5 prior therapies (with no prior exposure to immunotherapy) were analyzed. The tumors varied in location (eight abdomen, three lower limb, two upper limb, two pelvis, and one neck). ORR was 18.8% (3/16; 3 confirmed PR): 40% regression (PFS 30+ months), 83% regression (PFS 16 months) and 71% regression (PFS 8.4 months). Seven additional patients (43.8%) had prolonged SD over 6 months (PFS: 16.5, 22.4+, 22.6, 30.1, 38.2+, 48.3+ and 60.7+ months). Overall CBR was 62.5% (10/16). Median PFS was 19.4 months, with 6-month PFS of 73% and 1-year PFS of 67%. All patients were alive at 1 year; median OS was not assessable, as 13 patients were alive at analysis. Common adverse events included fatigue, nausea and hypothyroidism, with 50% experiencing grade 3-4 events. There were no grade 5 events.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in desmoid tumors yielded an ORR of 18.8% and a CBR of 62.5% with durable responses seen. This is the first prospective study exploring the efficacy of this combination in this rare disease. Ongoing studies aim to identify markers for response and resistance. Expanded trials are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02834013.

SWOG 1609 cohort 48: anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 for advanced gallbladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Most patients with advanced gallbladder cancer are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer the possibility of a durable response with less toxicity. This prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the anticancer activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to ≥1 previous therapy received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] confirmed on subsequent scan); secondary end points included unconfirmed overall response, clinical benefit rate (confirmed and unconfirmed responses + stable disease >6 months), progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The confirmed ORR was 16% (CR, n = 1 [5%]; PR, n = 2 [11%]); all were microsatellite stable, and the confirmed CR had undetectable programmed death-ligand 1 by immunohistochemistry. The unconfirmed ORR and clinical benefit rates were both 32%. The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range, 4-35.1+ months). The 6-month progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI, 12-55). The median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-19.1). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%), anemia (26%), and anorexia (26%). Aspartate aminotransferase elevation was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (11%). There was 1 possibly related death (sepsis with attendant hepatic failure).

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed modest efficacy with durable responses in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02834013 (ClincialTrials.gov).

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This prospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 19 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to previous therapy. The combination demonstrated modest efficacy with a 16% confirmed overall response rate, durable responses, and manageable toxicities, suggesting potential benefits for this challenging patient population.

[Advances of Treatment of Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma]

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of lung is a rare neuroendocrine carcinoma subtype with difficulty in early diagnosis and poor prognosis which is treated with standard strategies of small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. In recent years, the precise types of LCNEC and its response to therapy have been identified by next-generation sequencing. Some researches have also found the correlation between different subtypes of LCNEC and the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens. However, there is no consensual agreement of its therapy. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a new option for LCNEC patients based on some retrospective research data and case reports. In this review, we aimed to summarize the epidemiological characteristics, standard therapy, the advances of molecular subtypes and clinical applications of ICIs of LCNEC, so as to provide optimal systemic clinical decision-making for LCNEC patients.
.

Phase II basket trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: adrenocortical carcinoma cohort

OBJECTIVES

Multiple common cancers benefit from immunotherapy; however, less is known about efficacy in rare tumors. We report the results of the adrenocortical carcinoma cohort of NCI/SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors.

DESIGN/SETTING

A prospective, phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was conducted by the SWOG Early Therapeutics and Rare Cancers Committee for multiple rare tumor cohorts across >1,000 National Clinical Trial Network sites.

PARTICIPANTS

21 eligible patients were registered. Median age was 53 years (range 26-69); 16 (76%) were women.

INTERVENTIONS

Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks with nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks was administered until disease progression, symptomatic deterioration, treatment delay for any reason >56 days, unacceptable or immune-related toxicity with inability to decrease prednisone to <10 mg daily, or per patient request.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) (RECIST V.1.1). Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (CBR) (includes stable disease (SD)>6 months), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Immune-related outcomes included immune ORR (iORR), immune CBR (iCBR), and immune PFS (iPFS). A two-stage design was used assuming: null=5% alternative=30%, n=6 in the first stage, 16 max, one-sided alpha=13%.

RESULTS

The median number of prior therapy lines was 2 (range: 1-9). 3 of 21 patients attained confirmed partial response (PR) (ORR=14%). In addition, one patient had an unconfirmed PR; one, stable disease (SD)>6 months; one, immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) PR (iPR); and one patient attained iSD>6 months: clinical benefit rate (response or SD>6 months)=5/21 (24%), iORR=4/21 (19%), iCBR=7/21 (33%). The 6-month PFS was 24%; 6-month iPFS, 33%. The PFS for patients (N=7) with iRECIST clinical benefit were 57, 52, 18, 15, 13, 7, and 7 months. The 6-month OS was 76%; the median OS, was 15.8 months. The most common toxicities were fatigue (62%) and rash (38%), and the most common grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (9.5%) and adrenal insufficiency (9.5%). Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy in four patients (21%). There were no grade 5 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab is active in refractory metastatic adrenocortical cancer meeting the primary endpoint of the study, with a 19% iORR and 33% iCBR (includes SD/iSD>6 months) and with the longest PFS/iPFS of 52 and 57 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02834013 (registered 15 July, 2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013).

Progress on immuno-microenvironment and immune-related therapies in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an indolent malignant syndrome. The standard treatment for PMP is cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). However, the high recurrence rate and latent clinical symptoms and signs are major obstacles to further improving clinical outcomes. Moreover, patients in advanced stages receive little benefit from CRS + HIPEC due to widespread intraperitoneal metastases. Another challenge in PMP treatment involves the progressive sclerosis of PMP cell-secreted mucus, which is often increased due to activating mutations in the gene coding for guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha subunit (GNAS). Consequently, the development of other PMP therapies is urgently needed. Several immune-related therapies have shown promise, including the use of bacterium-derived non-specific immunogenic agents, radio-immunotherapeutic agents, and tumor cell-derived neoantigens, but a well-recognized immunotherapy has not been established. In this review the roles of GNAS mutations in the promotion of mucin secretion and disease development are discussed. In addition, the immunologic features of the PMP microenvironment and immune-associated treatments are discussed to summarize the current understanding of key features of the disease and to facilitate the development of immunotherapies.

Molecular characterization of the salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma immune landscape by anatomic subsites

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a slow-growing salivary gland malignancy that relapses frequently. AdCCs of the submandibular gland exhibit unique differences in prognosis and treatment response to adjuvant radiotherapy compared to other sites, yet the role of tumor anatomic subsite on gene expression and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) composition remains unclear. We used 87 samples, including 48 samples (27 AdCC and 21 normal salivary gland tissue samples) from 4 publicly available AdCC RNA sequencing datasets, a validation set of 33 minor gland AdCCs, and 39 samples from an in-house cohort (30 AdCC and 9 normal salivary gland samples). RNA sequencing data were used for single sample gene set enrichment analysis and TIME deconvolution. Quantitative PCR and multiplex immunofluorescence were performed on the in-house cohort. Wilcoxon rank-sum, nonparametric equality-of-medians tests and linear regression models were used to evaluate tumor subsite differences. AdCCs of different anatomic subsites including parotid, submandibular, sublingual, and minor salivary glands differed with respect to expression of several key tumorigenic pathways. Among the three major salivary glands, the reactive oxygen species (ROS)/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) pathway signature was significantly underexpressed in AdCC of submandibular compared to parotid and sublingual glands while this association was not observed among normal glands. Additionally, the NRF2 pathway, whose expression was associated with favorable overall survival, was overexpressed in AdCCs of parotid gland compared to minor and submandibular glands. The TIME deconvolution identified differences in CD4+ T cell populations between AdCC of major and minor glands and natural killer (NK) cells among AdCC of minor, submandibular, and parotid glands while plasma cells were enriched in normal submandibular glands compared to other normal gland controls. Our data reveal key molecular differences in AdCC of different anatomic subsites. The ROS and NRF2 pathways are underexpressed in submandibular and minor AdCCs compared to parotid gland AdCCs, and NRF2 pathway expression is associated with favorable overall survival. The CD4+ T, NK, and plasma cell populations also vary by tumor subsites, suggesting that the observed submandibular AdCC tumor-intrinsic pathway differences may be responsible for influencing the TIME composition and survival differences.

Unlocking the Potential: A Systematic Review of Master Protocol in Pediatrics

The use of master protocols allows for innovative approaches to clinical trial designs, potentially enabling new approaches to operations and analytics and creating value for patients and drug developers. Pediatric research has been conducted for many decades, but the use of novel designs such as master protocols in pediatric research is not well understood. This study aims to provide a systematic review on the utilization of master protocols in pediatric drug development. A search was performed in September 2022 using two data sources (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov) and included studies conducted in the past10 years. General study information was extracted such as study type, study status, therapeutic area, and clinical trial phase. Study characteristics that are specific to pediatric studies (such as age of the participants and pediatric drug dosing) and important study design elements (such as number of test drug arms and whether randomization and/or concurrent control was used) were also collected. Our results suggest that master protocol studies are being used in pediatrics, with platform and basket trials more common than umbrella trials. Most of this experience is in oncology and early phase studies. There is a rise in the use starting in 2020, largely in oncology and COVID-19 trials. However, adoption of master protocols in pediatric clinical research is still on a small scale and could be substantially expanded. Work is required to further understand the barriers in implementing pediatric master protocols, from setting up infrastructure to interpreting study findings.

Competing risk nomogram and risk classification system for evaluating overall and cancer-specific survival in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a population-based retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare malignancy with poor clinical prognosis due to limited therapeutic options. This study aimed to establish a risk-stratification score and nomogram models to predict prognosis in NECC patients.

METHODS

Data on individuals diagnosed with NECC between 2000 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and then randomly classified into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated independent indicators of prognosis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis further assisted in confirming candidate variables. Based on these factors, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) nomograms that predict survival over 1, 3, and 5 years were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the concordance index (C-index), and the calibration curve estimated the precision and discriminability of the competing risk nomogram for both cohorts. Finally, we assessed the clinical value of the nomograms using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Data from 2348 patients were obtained from the SEER database. Age, tumor stage, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery predicted OS. Additionally, histological type was another standalone indicator of CSS prognosis. For predicting CSS, the C-index was 0.751 (95% CI 0.731 ~ 0.770) and 0.740 (95% CI 0.710 ~ 0.770) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the C-index in OS prediction was 0.757 (95% CI 0.738 ~ 0.776) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.718 ~ 0.776) for both cohorts. The proposed model had an excellent discriminative ability. Good accuracy and discriminability were also demonstrated using the AUC and calibration curves. Additionally, DCA demonstrated the high clinical potential of the nomograms for CSS and OS prediction. We constructed a corresponding risk classification system using nomogram scores. For the whole cohort, the median CSS times for the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 59.3, 19.5, and 7.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

New competing risk nomograms and a risk classification system were successfully developed to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS and OS of NECC patients. The models are internally accurate and reliable and may guide clinicians toward better clinical decisions and the development of personalized treatment plans.

Emerging Treatment Options for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Unknown Primary Origin: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Among neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), a non-negligible proportion (9-22%) is represented by sufferers of NENs of unknown primary origin (UPO), a poor prognostic group with largely unmet clinical needs. In the absence of standard therapeutic algorithms, current guidelines suggest that the treatment of UPO-NENs should be based on tumor clinical-pathological characteristics, disease burden, and patient conditions. Chemotherapy represents the backbone for the treatment of high-grade poorly differentiated UPO-NENs, usually providing deep but short-lasting responses. Conversely, the spectrum of available systemic therapy options for well-differentiated UPO-NENs may range from somatostatin analogs in indolent low-grade tumors, to peptide receptor radioligand therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or chemotherapy for more aggressive tumors or in case of high disease burden. In recent years, molecular profiling has provided deep insights into the molecular landscape of UPO-NENs, with both diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Although preliminary, interesting activity data have been provided about upfront chemoimmunotherapy, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and the combination of ICIs plus TKIs in this setting. Here, we review the literature from the last 30 years to examine the available evidence about the treatment of UPO-NENs, with a particular focus on future perspectives, including the expanding scenario of targeted agents in this setting.

Correlation between tumor size change and outcome in a rare cancer immunotherapy basket trial

BACKGROUND

RECIST criteria for progressive disease, partial response, and complete response, reflecting +20%, -30%, and -100% tumor size changes, respectively, are critical outcome variables in oncology clinical trials. Herein, we evaluated post-immunotherapy tumor size change correlation with outcomes.

METHODS

We used a unique clinical trial data resource, a multicenter basket trial in patients with rare solid tumors treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) between 2017 and 2023 (National Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group-sponsored DART trial [NCT02834013]) (open at 1083 sites at its peak). Outcome associations were evaluated by survival analysis techniques including Martingale residuals.

RESULTS

In 638 evaluable patients, we found strong linear relationships between percent change in tumor measurement up to a 40%-50% increase and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (both Cox regression P < .001; landmark analyses based on day 65). Pearson R correlation between survival estimates and tumor change category were -0.94, -0.89, and -0.89 (PFS) and -0.84, -0.90, and -0.90 (OS) for median, 6-month (PFS), and 1-year (OS) and for 1-year (PFS) and 2-year (OS) estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Percent change in tumor measurement per RECISTv1.1 (the sum of longest dimensions of target lesions) has a linear association with PFS and OS up to a 40% to 50% increase in tumor measurement in this cohort of patients with rare cancers who received combination immune checkpoint blockade. Quantitative first scan tumor measurement changes include important information to evaluate the potential efficacy of a therapy beyond the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response.

Contemporary Approaches to the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is on the rise primarily due to the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging. Most of these incidentally detected lesions are non-functional PNETs with a small proportion of lesions being hormone-secreting, functional neoplasms. With recent advances in surgical approaches and systemic therapies, the management of PNETs have undergone a paradigm shift towards a more individualized approach. In this manuscript, we review the histologic classification and diagnostic approaches to both functional and non-functional PNETs. Additionally, we detail multidisciplinary approaches and surgical considerations tailored to the tumor's biology, location, and functionality based on recent evidence. We also discuss the complexities of metastatic disease, exploring liver-directed therapies and the evolving landscape of minimally invasive surgical techniques.

A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART SWOG 1609 Cohort 47) in Patients with Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia

PURPOSE

The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) remains uncertain. We report the results of the GTN cohort of SWOG S1609 dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, open-label phase II trial evaluated ipilimumab plus nivolumab across multiple rare tumor cohorts, including GTN. Eligible patients received nivolumab 240 mg, i.v. every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg i.v. every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] by quantitative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Four patients with refractory GTN enrolled and received therapy. At 11 months of ongoing follow-up, 3 of 4 patients responded [ORR = 75% (CR, 25%, n = 1, tumor mutation burden = 1 mutation/megabase; PD-L1 tumor proportion score = 50%); PR, 50%, n = 2)]. Responders included malignant gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (n = 1, CR, PFS 11+ months) and choriocarcinoma (n = 2, both PRs, PFS 10+ and 6+ months). One patient with epithelioid trophoblastic tumor experienced disease progression. The 6-month PFS was 75% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43%-100%], and the median PFS was not reached (range, 35-339+ days); all 4 patients were alive at last follow-up. Two patients experienced grade 3 immune-related toxicity (arthralgia and colitis); there were no grade ≥4 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated efficacy in chemotherapy-refractory GTN, an ultra-rare cancer affecting young women. Three of 4 patients achieved ongoing objective responses with a reasonable safety profile at 6-11+ months.

Home-run trials for rare cancers: giving the right drug(s) to the right patients at the right time and in the right place

In oncology clinical trials, many patients spend their final months at a central clinical trial facility far from home for "mandatory" protocol visits/diagnostic testing. Studies suggest that the travel strain may be greatest among patients living in low-income areas and/or participating in early-phase studies. In this regard, rare cancers constitute a special unmet need with limited therapeutic options and few trials. Though individually uncommon, rare cancers as a group constitute ~22% of the cancer burden; the portion of cancer burden may even be greater if biomarker-defined rare subsets of either a single cancer type or a tissue-agnostic subgroup are included. Exacerbating the access issue is the fact that, in addition to the paucity of trials, many centers will not activate existing single-arm trials, often due to accrual concerns, which may further disadvantage this patient group and also jeopardize trial completion. Decentralized clinical trials may resolve some of these challenges by allowing patients to participate from close to home. Decentralized clinical trials can take the form of being site-less, with the coordinating body working remotely and care provided by the home oncologist, or by taking the tack of National Cancer Institute/cooperative groups (e.g., NCI-MATCH genomics matching trial or SWOG1609 [NCI] DART immunotherapy rare cancer trial) using a platform design with multiple cohorts and opening at >1000 sites. Decentralized trials now also have supportive FDA guidance. Importantly, home-run trials permit clinical trial access to underserved groups, including those in rural areas and patients financially unable to travel to a central facility.

Targeted radionuclide therapy in endocrine-related cancers: advances in the last decade

Targeted radionuclide therapy plays an increasingly important role in managing endocrine-related tumors and significantly advances the therapeutic landscape for patients with these diseases. With increasing FDA-approved therapies and advances in the field, come an increased knowledge of the potential for long-term toxicities associated with these therapies and the field must develop new strategies to increase potency and efficacy while individualizing the selection of patients to those most likely to respond to treatment. Novel agents and modalities of therapy are also being explored. This review will discuss the current landscape and describe the avenues for growth in the field currently being explored.

BRAF V600E-mutated large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma responding to targeted therapy: a case report and review of the literature

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine tumor, commonly arising in the lung or in the gastrointestinal tract, with a frequent proportion of unknown primary origin (20%). In the metastatic setting, platinum-based or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapeutic regimens are as considered the first-line treatment, despite the limited duration of response. To date, the prognosis of advanced high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma remains poor, suggesting the need to explore new treatment strategies in this orphan tumor. The evolving molecular landscape of LCNEC, not yet been completely defined, could explain the heterogeneous response to different chemotherapeutic regimens and suggest that treatment strategy could be driven by molecular features. v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations, well described in melanoma, thyroid cancer, colon cancer and lung adenocarcinoma, account for approximately 2% of cases in lung LCNEC. Here, we describe the case of a patient with a BRAF V600E-mutated LCNEC of unknown primary origin who partially responded to BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors after standard treatment. Additionally, BRAF V600E circulating tumor DNA was used to monitor disease response. Thereafter, we reviewed the available literature about the role of targeted therapy in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms to provide insight for future research to identify patients with driver oncogenic mutations, who can potentially benefit from target therapy.

Defining Tumor Microenvironment as a Possible Target for Effective GEP-NENs Immunotherapy-A Systematic Review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous and recurrent group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine secretory cells diffused on all parts of the human body. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for most NENs. Considering the abundance of possible origins, locations, and tumor specifications, there is still no consensus about optimal treatment options for these neoplasms. In light of the escalating immunotherapeutic approaches, it is crucial to define indications for such therapy in GEP-NETs. Bearing in mind the significance of pathophysiological mechanisms and tumor microenvironment (TME) impact on carcinogenesis, defining TME structure and correlation with the immune system in GEP-NETs appears essential. This paper aimed to assess the characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment for a better understanding of the possible therapeutic options in GEP-NETS. The authors performed a systematic review, extracting papers from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Among 3800 articles identified through database searching, 292 were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 28 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. This paper sums up the research on the immune cell infiltrates, immune checkpoint expression, cytokine profile, neoangiogenesis, and microbiome in the TME of GEP-NETs.

Selection of Chemotherapy in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare, and evidence for treatment has been limited. In this article, the evidence behind the cytotoxic chemotherapy choices used for metastatic or unresectable EP-PD-NEC is reviewed. In the first-line setting, etoposide and platinum chemotherapy or irinotecan and platinum have been demonstrated to be equivalent in a large phase III trial. Questions remain regarding the optimal number of cycles, mode of delivery, and the precise definition of platinum resistance in this setting. In the second-line setting, FOLFIRI has emerged as an option, with randomized phase 2 trials demonstrating modest, but significant, response rates. Beyond this, data are extremely limited, and several regimens have been used. Heterogeneity in biological behaviour is a major barrier to optimal EP-PD-NEC management. Available data support the potential role of the Ki-67 index as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response. A more personalised approach to management in future studies will be essential, and comprehensive multi-omic approaches are required to understand tumour somatic genetic changes in relation to their effects on the surrounding microenvironment.

Managing Metastatic Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma After First-Line Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that can arise from any organ and frequently presents with distant metastases. Advanced disease has a poor prognosis with median overall survival (OS) rarely exceeding 1 year even with systemic therapy. The management paradigm of advanced/metastatic EP-NEC has been extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and commonly consists of 1st line therapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by alternative cytotoxic regimens at the time of progression. Only a minority of patients are able to receive 2nd line therapy, and cytotoxics derived from the SCLC paradigm such as topotecan or lurbinectedin have very limited activity. We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic options in the 2nd and later lines and survey potential future developments in this space.

RECENT FINDINGS

After a long period of stagnation in treatment options and outcomes, more promising regimens are gradually being utilized in the 2nd line setting including systemic therapy combinations such as FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, modified FOLFIRINOX, CAPTEM, and, more recently, novel checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. Simultaneously, advances in the understanding of disease biology are helping to refine patient selection and identify commonalities between NEC and their sites of origin which may eventually lead to additional targeted therapy options. While many questions remain, contemporary developments give grounds for optimism that improved outcomes for EP-NEC will soon be within reach.

Localized Colonic Small-Cell Carcinoma with Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Cisplatin and Etoposide: A Case Report

Extrapulmonary small-cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare neoplasm that shares certain features with its pulmonary counterpart and occurs predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). It is a high-grade and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, usually diagnosed in advanced stages, with a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options in that setting. This is a case report of a 77-year-old Spanish male patient with localized SCC of the colon, who presented a pathological complete response in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide. To date, 5 years after surgery, the patient remains without evidence of tumor recurrence. As clinical guidelines for the management of this entity are lacking, and therefore its management has not been standardized, an attempt to summarize the current evidence in the literature was made.

Consensus report of the 2021 National Cancer Institute neuroendocrine tumor clinical trials planning meeting

Important progress has been made over the last decade in the classification, imaging, and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NENs), with several new agents approved for use. Although the treatment options available for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have greatly expanded, the rapidly changing landscape has presented several unanswered questions about how best to optimize, sequence, and individualize therapy. Perhaps the most important development over the last decade has been the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, raising questions around optimal sequencing of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) relative to other therapeutic options, the role of re-treatment with PRRT, and whether PRRT can be further optimized through use of dosimetry among other approaches. The NET Task Force of the National Cancer Institute GI Steering Committee convened a clinical trial planning meeting in 2021 with multidisciplinary experts from academia, the federal government, industry, and patient advocates to develop NET clinical trials in the era of PRRT. Key clinical trial recommendations for development included 1) PRRT re-treatment, 2) PRRT and immunotherapy combinations, 3) PRRT and DNA damage repair inhibitor combinations, 4) treatment for liver-dominant disease, 5) treatment for PRRT-resistant disease, and 6) dosimetry-modified PRRT.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy Updates in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from neuroendocrine cells dispersed throughout the organs/tissues of the body. Treatment of advanced/metastatic disease varies depending on tumor origin and grade. Somatostatin analogs (SSA) have been the mainstay first-line treatment in the advanced/metastatic setting for tumor control and managing hormonal syndromes. Treatments beyond SSAs have expanded to include everolimus (mTOR inhibitor), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (e.g., sunitinib), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the choice of therapy to some extent dictated by the anatomic origin of the NETs. This review will focus on emerging systemic treatments for advanced/metastatic NETs, particularly TKIs, and immunotherapy.

Potent molecular-targeted therapies for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), which are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation, can arise in various organs. NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphological differentiation, each of which has a distinct etiology, molecular profile, and clinicopathological features. While the majority of NECs originate in the pulmonary organs, extrapulmonary NECs occur most predominantly in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic GEP-NEC patients, the clinical benefits are limited and associated with a poor prognosis, indicating the clinically urgent need for effective therapeutic agents. The clinical development of molecular-targeted therapies has been hampered due to the rarity of GEP-NECs and the paucity of knowledge on their biology. In this review, we summarize the biology, current treatments, and molecular profiles of GEP-NECs based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses; we also highlight potent therapeutic targets for future precision medicine based on the most recent results of clinical trials.

Deep and Repeated Response to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in a Patient With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma With Brain Metastases: A Case Report

Metastatic CUP is complex, especially NCUP. Precision oncology is crucial for rare, aggressive cancers. A 54-year-old had HER2+ neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown origin. T-DXd treatment, response, re-challenge show importance of genomics and caution.

Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in previously treated, extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

To date, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has proven to be ineffective against biomarker-unselected extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). The efficacy of CPI in combination with chemotherapy remains under investigation.

METHODS

Patients with advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs were enrolled in a two-part study of pembrolizumab-based therapy. In Part A, patients received pembrolizumab alone. In Part B, patients received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumours were profiled for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high/mismatch repair deficient status, mutational burden (TMB), genomic correlates. Tumour growth rate was evaluated.

RESULTS

Part A (N = 14): ORR (pembrolizumab alone) 7% (95% CI, 0.2-33.9%), median PFS 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-21.4), median OS 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached); 14% of patients (N = 2) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Part B (N = 22): ORR (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) 5% (95% CI, 0-22.8%), median PFS 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.4), median OS 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2); 45% of patients (N = 10) had grade 3/4 TRAEs. The two patients with objective response had high-TMB tumours.

DISCUSSION

Treatment with pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was ineffective in advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03136055.

Grade Progression and Intrapatient Tumor Heterogeneity as Potential Contributors to Resistance in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous group of tumors that are incurable when metastatic, regardless of grade. The aim of this article is to understand tumor heterogeneity and grade progression as possible contributors to drug resistance in gastroentropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Heterogeneity has been observed in the genetic, pathological, and imaging features of these tumors at baseline. Diagnostic challenges related to tumor sampling and the potential for changes in grade over time further confound our ability to optimize therapy for patients. A better understanding of NEN biology and tumor heterogeneity at baseline and over time could lead to the development of new therapeutic avenues.

Progress in immunotherapy for neuroendocrine neoplasm of the digestive system

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare heterogeneous tumors that can develop in almost any organ, with the digestive organs, including the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas being the most commonly affected sites. Despite the fact that advances in initial therapies have progressed, there is presently no recognized effective treatment for advanced NEN. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown superior efficacy in treating several types of solid tumors. Despite their successful role in the treatment of partial NENs, such as small cell lung cancer, and Merkel cell carcinoma, the role of ICIs in most of the NENs remains limited. Nevertheless, due to their specific anti-tumor mechanisms and acceptable safety profile, ICIs are a promising avenue for further study in NENs therapy. Recent clinical trials have illustrated that combination therapy with ICI is more efficient than monotherapy, and multiple clinical trials are constantly ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these combination therapies. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical progress of immunotherapy in NENs affecting the digestive system, with a specific emphasis on the application of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death receptor ligand 1 inhibitor. Furthermore, this review has an exploration of the potential beneficiary population and the inherent value of utilizing immunotherapy in the management of NENs.

NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment.

Methods

Patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977).

Findings

Of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4-29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2-27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2-6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3-10) and 6 months (95%CI:3-9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B.

Interpretation

nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients.

Funding

Servier.

Urinary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated in the "Modern Era": A Multicenter Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary).

CONCLUSION

This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

Gastrointestinal treatment-related adverse events of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Introduction: Combined immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause gastrointestinal adverse events. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of pooled colonic, hepatic and pancreatic treatment-related adverse events of combined ICI. Results: 53 trials reporting treatment-related adverse events in 6581 patients. All grade diarrhea was the most common adverse event seen in 25.4% patients, followed by all grade hepatitis in nearly 13% patients and pancreatitis in nearly 7.5% patients. Conclusion: Our study provides pooled data of treatment-related adverse events from different combination immune checkpoint inhibitors use in solid tumors and demonstrates a high incidence of all grades and ≥3 grade gastrointestinal adverse events. Further studies are required to characterize these adverse events and assess their overall impact on treatment course and outcomes.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Neuroendocrine tumors have variety of biological and clinical characteristics. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasm has evolved, and the newest 2019 World Health Organization classification outlines a well-differentiated high-grade G3 subtype, recognizing its differences from the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTAT PET has largely replaced somatostatin scintigraphy as the diagnostic workup choice for NENs. NETest, a multi-analyte liquid biopsy, is a promising recent development in the biochemical diagnosis. Management includes wait and watch approach, surgical resection, somatostatin analogs, ¹⁷⁷Lu DOTATATE therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy combinations. Further clinical trials are necessary for determining the appropriate sequencing.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Genetics and Epigenetics

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of rare, heterogeneous tumors of neuroendocrine cell origin, affecting a range of different organs. The clinical management of NENs poses significant challenges, as tumors are often diagnosed at an advanced stage where overall survival remains poor with current treatment regimens. In addition, a host of complex and often unique molecular changes underpin the pathobiology of each NEN subtype. Exploitation of the unique genetic and epigenetic signatures driving each NEN subtype provides an opportunity to enhance the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of NEN in an emerging era of individualized medicine.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides up-to-date and practical advice on the diagnosis and management of digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on recent developments and study results. These recommendations aim to pave the road for more standardized care for our patients resulting in improved outcomes. Prognosis is generally poor for digestive NEC, most are advanced at diagnosis and median survival in metastatic disease is 11-12 months. Surgery can be of benefit for localized disease after extensive preoperative imaging. Carboplatin in combination with etoposide is recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Irinotecan with fluoropyrimidines has the best evidence as second-line treatment. Immunotherapy plays a minor role in biomarker-unselected patients. Molecular profiling if available is encouraged to identify new targets. More prospective clinical trials are highly needed to fulfil the unmet needs in this field, especially on new predictive and prognostic biomarkers and to improve survival of patients with advanced disease.

Future therapeutic strategies in the treatment of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma: a review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare malignancies arising most commonly in the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary systems. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are a subgroup of NENs characterised by aggressive tumour biology, poor differentiation and dismal prognosis. Most NEC primary lesions arise in the pulmonary system. However, a small proportion arise outside of the lung and are termed extrapulmonary (EP)-, poorly differentiated (PD)-NECs. Patients with local or locoregional disease may benefit from surgical excision; however, this is often not an option, due to late presentation. To date, treatment has mirrored that of small-cell lung cancer, with platinum-etoposide forming the basis of first-line treatment. There is a lack of consensus in relation to the most effective second-line treatment option. Low incidence, an absence of representative preclinical models and a lack of understanding of the tumour microenvironment all present challenges to drug development in this disease group. However, progress made in elucidating the mutational landscape of EP-PD-NEC and the observations made in several clinical trials are paving the way towards improving outcomes for these patients. The optimisation and strategic delivery of chemotherapeutic interventions according to tumour characteristics and the utilisation of targeted and immune therapies in clinical studies have yielded mixed results. Targeted therapies that complement specific genetic aberrations are under investigation, including AURKA inhibitors in those with MYCN amplifications, BRAF inhibitors in those with BRAFV600E mutations and EGFR suppression, and Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitors in patients with ATM mutations. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have conferred promising results in several clinical trials, particularly with dual ICIs and in combination with targeted therapy or chemotherapy. However, further prospective investigations are required to elucidate the impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, tumour mutational burden and microsatellite instability on response. This review aims to explore the most recent developments in the treatment of EP-PD-NEC and contribute towards the requirement for clinical guidance founded on prospective evidence.

Integrating Functional Imaging and Molecular Profiling for Optimal Treatment Selection in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroenteropancreatic NEN (GEP-NEN) are group of malignancies with significant clinical, anatomical and molecular heterogeneity. High-grade GEP-NEN in particular present unique management challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the current era, multidisciplinary management with access to a combination of functional imaging and targeted molecular profiling can provide important disease characterisation, guide individualised management and improve patient outcome. Multiple treatment options are now available, and combination and novel therapies are being explored in clinical trials. Precision medicine is highly relevant for a heterogenous disease like NEN. The integration of dual-tracer functional PET/CT imaging, molecular histopathology and genomic data has the potential to be used to gain a more comprehensive understanding of an individual patient's disease biology for precision diagnosis, prognostication and optimal treatment allocation.

Emerging Immunotherapeutic and Diagnostic Modalities in Carcinoid Tumors

Evasion of innate immunity represents a frequently employed method by which tumor cells survive and thrive. Previously, the development of immunotherapeutic agents capable of overcoming this evasion has realized pronounced clinical utility across a variety of cancer types. More recently, immunological strategies have been investigated as potentially viable therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in the management of carcinoid tumors. Classic treatment options for carcinoid tumors rely upon surgical resection or non-immune pharmacology. Though surgical intervention can be curative, tumor characteristics, such as size, location, and spread, heavily limit success. Non-immune pharmacologic treatments can be similarly limited, and many demonstrate problematic side effects. Immunotherapy may be able to overcome these limitations and further improve clinical outcomes. Similarly, emerging immunologic carcinoid biomarkers may improve diagnostic capabilities. Recent developments in immunotherapeutic and diagnostic modalities of carcinoid management are summarized here.