A tale of atypia: What can we learn from this?

Atypical urothelial cells classified according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A 2-year experience with histological correlation from a Finnish tertiary care center-low rate and high risk of malignancy

BACKGROUND

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was issued to shift the focus of urine cytology to high-grade lesions to increase the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the power of TPS in the atypical urothelial cells (AUC) category with histological correlation and follow-up.

METHODS

The data cohort consisted of 3741 voided urine samples collected during a 2-year period between January 2017 and December 2018. All samples were prospectively classified using TPS. This study focuses on the subset of 205 samples (5.5%) classified as AUC. All cytological and histological follow-up data were analyzed until 2019, and the time between each sampling was documented.

RESULTS

Of the 205 AUC cases, cytohistological correlation was possible in 97 (47.3%) cases. Of these, 36 (12.7%) were benign in histology, 27 (13.2%) were low-grade urothelial carcinomas, and 34 (16.6%) were high-grade urothelial carcinomas. Overall, the risk of malignancy was 29.8% for all cases in the AUC category, and 62.9% in the histologically confirmed cases. The risk of high-grade malignancy was 16.6% in all the AUC category samples and 35.1% in the histological follow-up group.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of 5.5% AUC cases is considered good and within the limits proposed by TPS. TPS is widely accepted by cytotechnologists, cytopathologists, and clinicians; it improves communication and patient management.

Leveraging thoughtful quality metric selection for individual and system improvements: the atypical category and use of dashboards

Quality management is integral to the practice of cytopathology, especially given the heavily manual workflows and expanding ancillary testing requirements inherent to the cytopathology laboratory. Monitoring quality data like turnaround time, specimen unsatisfactory rates, and diagnostic category utilization rates allows for better understanding of performance with opportunities for targeted improvement if there are variations from that which is expected. However, there are costs to quality monitoring including the time and resources needed, and, in already taxed systems, quality management risks being viewed as just another box to check. While there are mandated quality metrics that must be collected by cytology laboratories, thoughtful selection of key performance indicators can be of tremendous benefit in helping to better understand complex laboratory processes and directing improvement endeavors where needed. The following short communication is a discussion on quality management in the cytopathology laboratory from 3 Cytopathology Quality Management Directors. The discussion focuses on monitoring the atypical reporting category with an emphasis on how trending and visualizing quality metrics can provide laboratories with key data.

Cytologic diagnosis of "atypical" in serous fluid cytopathology. Approach of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology

Diagnostic uncertainty may occur with almost any entity on cytological evaluation, depending on the quality and quantity of the provided sample. In serous fluid cytopathology, until recently, there had been no defined or agreed criteria for atypia and suspicious categories. Historically, the two descriptive terms appear to have been used almost interchangeably. The international system for serous fluid cytopathology is the first attempt by an expert international authorship to suggest the scenarios in which these terms are used and propose some diagnostic criteria and clinical management strategies.

Significance of hepatocyte atypia in liver fine needle aspiration

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the liver is frequently the diagnostic procedure of choice for sampling hepatic lesions. One of the main diagnostic challenges in the interpretation of liver FNA is distinguishing dysplastic lesions and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WD-HCC) from benign processes, as they share significant cytomorphologic overlap. Furthermore, the diagnosis of HCC often requires evaluation of stroma for invasion, which may not be present on cytology and small needle biopsy specimens. A reporting system for liver cytopathology has yet to be instituted. Without standardized and well-defined criteria for hepatocyte atypia, we recommend limiting the use of atypia in evaluation of liver FNA specimens to describe a diagnosis of exclusion, in which all known benign and neoplastic processes have been ruled out. The cytologic findings on the FNA of a liver nodule may be best reported as atypical hepatocytes in the absence of a core needle biopsy or cell block sufficient to render a definitive diagnosis of HCC.

Targeted education as a method for reinforcing Paris System criteria and reducing urine cytology atypia rates

INTRODUCTION

The Paris System for Urine Cytology (TPS) provides well-defined diagnostic criteria for the category of atypical urothelial cells (AUC). The current study compares the rate of AUC diagnoses at a large academic medical center before and after an educational intervention (EI) by a urine cytology expert.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An expert in TPS delivered an educational intervention consisting of an interactive microscope session and a didactic session that focused on the AUC diagnostic category. The number of urine cytology cases, the AUC rate, and the false-negative percentage were calculated before and after the EI, using the electronic medical records and cytologic-histologic correlation records.

RESULTS

A total of 4026 urine cytology cases were signed out in the 25 months prior to the educational intervention and 1585 cases were signed out in the 10 months after the intervention. EI had a significant impact on diagnostic categorization, including a reduction in AUC (19.6% versus 12.5%) and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (3.9% versus 3.1%) diagnoses. The cytotechnologists also placed fewer cases into the AUC category during primary screening (27.6% versus 23.0%). Although a higher percentage of cases was reported as negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, the false-negative rate did not significantly change after the intervention (1.8% versus 2.0% of negative cases, P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Focused educational sessions for pathologists and cytotechnologists on the diagnostic criteria for AUC as defined by TPS can significantly reduce the rate of atypical diagnoses without a significant increase in the rate of false negatives.

Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature

INTRODUCTION

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 with clear objectives to standardize cytologic diagnostic criteria and provide uniform reporting, in order to improve patient stratification and associated clinical management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TPS and review the literature published since TPS was introduced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Original articles focusing on the utilization and performance of TPS in urinary cytology specimens were identified using PubMed for publications from January 2016 to July 2020, using the keywords "Paris System", "urine cytology", and "urinary cytology".

RESULTS

Twenty-three relevant articles in the literature regarding the use of TPS were included in the review from a total of 30,802 urine cytology specimens, of which 21,485 (69.8%) had available diagnoses. Distribution of cases among categories ranged from 50.5% to 95.3% for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), 1.2% to 23% for atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 0.2% to 6.6% for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (SHGUC), and 2.2% to 14.1% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). The calculated risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) ranged from 8.7% to 36.8% for NHGUC, 12.3% to 60.9%% for AUC, 33.3% to 100% for SHGUC, and 58.8% to 100% for HGUC. Mean ROHM weighted by sample size was calculated at 15.7% (±7.8%), 38.5% (±14.3%), 76.2% (±17.2%), and 88.8% (±12.7%) for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Reported sensitivity of TPS ranged from 40% to 84.7%, specificity from 73% to 100%, PPV from 62.3% to 100%, and NPV from 46% to 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of TPS in the selected series has improved the screening and surveillance potential of urine cytology, while reducing high rates of indeterminate diagnoses, improving sensitivity and providing proper risk stratification for patients.

The Paris system of Reporting Urinary Cytology: Strengths and opportunities

The Paris system for reporting urinary cytopathology (TPS) was created to address inherent weaknesses inherent in the practice of urinary cytopathology. While urothelial cytology has always performed well at finding high grade, genetically unstable urothelial carcinoma, it performs poorly when it comes to detecting low-grade urothelial neoplasia. TPS intends to improve the utility of urothelial cytology by focusing on what is important, high-grade urothelial carcinoma. This article is a snapshot of the current state of TPS as it heads into its second edition. Successes are described and further developments are considered.

The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH

Aims

The Paris System (TPS) was introduced in the diagnostic routine with the goal to simplify and standardise diagnostic reporting of urinary cytology. The diagnostic categories of TPS are based on defined cytological criteria, with a focus on high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). While the categories ‘negative for HGUC (NHGUC)’ and ‘HGUC’ are straightforward, the categories ‘atypical urothelial cells (AUC)’ and ‘suspicious of HGUC (SHGUC)’ remain inconclusive. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of TPS in daily practice with special emphasis on ancillary fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) testing in the setting of TPS categories.

Methods

In a 19-month period, TPS was prospectively applied in the routine diagnostic setting on 3900 urinary cytology cases comprising bladder and upper urinary tract washings and voided urine specimens. Additionally, we analysed the results of the FISH assay UroVysion prospectively performed on a cohort of 128 cases enriched for AUC and SHGUC categories.

Results

The most frequently reported category was NHGUC (n=3496, 89.7%), followed by AUC (n=178, 4.6%), HGUC (n=155, 4%), SHGUC (n=61, 1.6%), low-grade urothelial neoplasia (n=6, 0.1%) and other malignancies (n=4, 0.1%). In the FISH cohort, 40/90 (44%) cases within the AUC category were FISH positive, consistent with urothelial neoplasia. In the SHGUC category, 16/21 (76%) cases were FISH positive.

Conclusions

When prospectively applying TPS in urinary cytology, inconclusive atypia accounts only for a small subset of cases. FISH additionally improves the stratification between reactive and malignant cells in the indeterminate AUC and SHGUC categories.