Interhemispheric connections in the visual cortex of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)

The squirrel monkey model in clinical neuroscience

Clinical neuroscience research relying on animal models brought valuable translational insights into the function and pathologies of the human brain. The anatomical, physiological, and behavioural similarities between humans and mammals have prompted researchers to study cerebral mechanisms at different levels to develop and test new treatments. The vast majority of biomedical research uses rodent models, which are easily manipulable and have a broadly resembling organisation to the human nervous system but cannot satisfactorily mimic some disorders. For these disorders, macaque monkeys have been used as they have a more comparable central nervous system. Still, this research has been hampered by limitations, including high costs and reduced samples. This review argues that a squirrel monkey model might bridge the gap by complementing translational research from rodents, macaque, and humans. With the advent of promising new methods such as ultrasound imaging, tool miniaturisation, and a shift towards open science, the squirrel monkey model represents a window of opportunity that will potentially fuel new translational discoveries in the diagnosis and treatment of brain pathologies.

Retinotopic organization of extrastriate cortex in the owl monkey--dorsal and lateral areas

Dense retinotopy data sets were obtained by microelectrode visual receptive field mapping in dorsal and lateral visual cortex of anesthetized owl monkeys. The cortex was then physically flatmounted and stained for myelin or cytochrome oxidase. Retinotopic mapping data were digitized, interpolated to a uniform grid, analyzed using the visual field sign technique-which locally distinguishes mirror image from nonmirror image visual field representations-and correlated with the myelin or cytochrome oxidase patterns. The region between V2 (nonmirror) and MT (nonmirror) contains three areas-DLp (mirror), DLi (nonmirror), and DLa/MTc (mirror). DM (mirror) was thin anteroposteriorly, and its reduced upper field bent somewhat anteriorly away from V2. DI (nonmirror) directly adjoined V2 (nonmirror) and contained only an upper field representation that also adjoined upper field DM (mirror). Retinotopy was used to define area VPP (nonmirror), which adjoins DM anteriorly, area FSTd (mirror), which adjoins MT ventrolaterally, and TP (mirror), which adjoins MT and DLa/MTc dorsoanteriorly. There was additional retinotopic and architectonic evidence for five more subdivisions of dorsal and lateral extrastriate cortex-TA (nonmirror), MSTd (mirror), MSTv (nonmirror), FSTv (nonmirror), and PP (mirror). Our data appear quite similar to data from marmosets, though our field sign-based areal subdivisions are slightly different. The region immediately anterior to the superiorly located central lower visual field V2 varied substantially between individuals, but always contained upper fields immediately touching lower visual field V2. This region appears to vary even more between species. Though we provide a summary diagram, given within- and between-species variation, it should be regarded as a guide to parsing complex retinotopy rather than a literal representation of any individual, or as the only way to agglomerate the complex mosaic of partial upper and lower field, mirror- and nonmirror-image patches into areas.

Towards a unified scheme of cortical lamination for primary visual cortex across primates: insights from NeuN and VGLUT2 immunoreactivity

Primary visual cortex (V1) is clearly distinguishable from other cortical areas by its distinctive pattern of neocortical lamination across mammalian species. In some mammals, primates in particular, the layers of V1 are further divided into a number of sublayers based on their anatomical and functional characteristics. While these sublayers are easily recognizable across a range of primates, the exact number of divisions in each layer and their relative position within the depth of V1 has been inconsistently reported, largely due to conflicting schemes of nomenclature for the V1 layers. This conflict centers on the definition of layer 4 in primate V1, and the subdivisions of layer 4 that can be consistently identified across primate species. Brodmann’s (1909) laminar scheme for V1 delineates three subdivisions of layer 4 in primates, based on cellular morphology and geniculate inputs in anthropoid monkeys. In contrast, Hässler’s (1967) laminar scheme delineates a single layer 4 and multiple subdivisions of layer 3, based on comparisons of V1 lamination across the primate lineage. In order to clarify laminar divisions in primate visual cortex, we performed NeuN and VGLUT2 immunohistochemistry in V1 of chimpanzees, Old World macaque monkeys, New World squirrel, owl, and marmoset monkeys, prosimian galagos and mouse lemurs, and non-primate, but highly visual, tree shrews. By comparing the laminar divisions identified by each method across species, we find that Hässler’s (1967) laminar scheme for V1 provides a more consistent representation of neocortical layers across all primates, including humans, and facilitates comparisons of V1 lamination with non-primate species. These findings, along with many others, support the consistent use of Hässler’s laminar scheme in V1 research.

Anatomical evidence for classical and extra-classical receptive field completion across the discontinuous horizontal meridian representation of primate area V2

In primates, a split of the horizontal meridian (HM) representation at the V2 rostral border divides this area into dorsal (V2d) and ventral (V2v) halves (representing lower and upper visual quadrants, respectively), causing retinotopically neighboring loci across the HM to be distant within V2. How is perceptual continuity maintained across this discontinuous HM representation? Injections of neuroanatomical tracers in marmoset V2d demonstrated that cells near the V2d rostral border can maintain retinotopic continuity within their classical and extra-classical receptive field (RF), by making both local and long-range intra- and interareal connections with ventral cortex representing the upper visual quadrant. V2d neurons located <0.9-1.3 mm from the V2d rostral border, whose RFs presumably do not cross the HM, make nonretinotopic horizontal connections with V2v neurons in the supra- and infragranular layers. V2d neurons located <0.6-0.9 mm from the border, whose RFs presumably cross the HM, in addition make retinotopic local connections with V2v neurons in layer 4. V2d neurons also make interareal connections with upper visual field regions of extrastriate cortex, but not of MT or MTc outside the foveal representation. Labeled connections in ventral cortex appear to represent the "missing" portion of the connectional fields in V2d across the HM. We conclude that connections between dorsal and ventral cortex can create visual field continuity within a second-order discontinuous visual topography.

CLARIFYING HOMOLOGIES IN THE MAMMALIAN CEREBRAL CORTEX: THE CASE OF THE THIRD VISUAL AREA (V3)

1. Experiments in mammalian models are the main source of information on the neural architecture underlying human visual perception, establishing scientific boundaries for the interpretation of experiments using non-invasive techniques in humans and for the realistic modelling of visual processes. Thus, it is important to define the homology between visual areas in different species. 2. To date, relatively few visual areas can be defined with certainty across mammalian Orders. Here, we review the evidence pointing to the fact that the third visual area (V3; or area 19) is a crucial node of a system involved in shape recognition that exists in most, if not all, eutherian mammals. 3. The size and shape of area V3 are variable, even between species that belong to the same Order. Although some features of the visuotopic organization of V3 are constant (including the relative location of the representations of the upper and lower quadrant and correspondence between the anterior border and the representation of the vertical meridian of the visual field), others are variable between species and even individuals. A complex pattern of representation, involving topological discontinuities, can exist. 4. In addition to its location in relation to the first (V1) and second (V2) visual areas, the identification of V3 homologues can be aided by certain other features, including low myelination, weak cytochrome oxidase reactivity, response properties that are indicative in the processing of stimulus shape, relationship to clusters of neurons forming interhemispheric connections and projections from the koniocellular (W-cell-like) components of the lateral geniculate nucleus. 5. Recent research in primates has clarified the organization of the V3 homologue in members of this Order. Regions of cortex that were formerly thought to belong to V3 (including a densely myelinated region near the dorsal midline) are better considered as part of a separate dorsomedial area, involved in motion analysis and visuomotor integration. The redefined V3, which includes the 'ventral posterior area' and parts of the dorsolateral complex proposed by earlier studies, is very similar to V3 (area 19) of other species in terms of structure and function.

Callosally projecting neurons in the macaque monkey V1/V2 border are enriched in nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein

Previous immunohistochemical studies combined with retrograde tracing in macaque monkeys have demonstrated that corticocortical projections can be differentiated by their content of neurofilament protein. The present study analyzed the distribution of nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein in callosally projecting neurons located at the V1/V2 border. All of the retrogradely labeled neurons were located in layer III at the V1/V2 border and at an immediately adjacent zone of area V2. A quantitative analysis showed that the vast majority (almost 95%) of these interhemispheric projection neurons contain neurofilament protein immunoreactivity. This observation differs from data obtained in other sets of callosal connections, including homotypical interhemispheric projections in the prefrontal, temporal, and parietal association cortices, that were found to contain uniformly low proportions of neurofilament protein-immunoreactive neurons. Comparably, highly variable proportions of neurofilament protein-containing neurons have been reported in intrahemispheric corticocortical pathways, including feedforward and feedback visual connections. These results indicate that neurofilament protein is a prominent neurochemical feature that identifies a particular population of interhemispheric projection neurons at the V1/V2 border and suggest that this biochemical attribute may be critical for the function of this subset of callosal neurons.

Visuotopic organisation of striate cortex in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

The visuotopic organisation of the primary visual cortex (V1) was studied by extracellular recordings in adult male marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) that were anaesthetised with sufentanil/nitrous oxide and paralysed with pancuronium bromide. Extensive sampling of the occipital region in four individuals and partial coverage of V1 in five others allowed not only the establishment of the normal visuotopy but also the study of interindividual variability. As in other primates, there was a single, continuous map of the contralateral hemifield in V1, with the upper visual quadrant represented ventrally and the lower quadrant represented dorsally. The surface area of V1, which was measured in two-dimensional reconstructions of the cortical surface, varied from 192 to 217 mm2. There was a marked emphasis on the representation of the foveal and parafoveal visual fields: the representation of the central 5 degrees of the visual field occupied 36-39% of the surface area of V1, whereas the central 10 degrees occupied 57-59%. No asymmetry between the representations of the upper and lower quadrants was apparent. The visual topography of V1 was highly consistent between individuals, relative to both sulcal landmarks and stereotaxic coordinates. The entire contralateral hemifield was represented in V1; in addition, neurones with receptive fields whose borders invaded the ipsilateral hemifield were observed within V1, less than 800 microns from the V1/V2 boundary. The total invasion of the ipsilateral hemifield was less than 0.5 degree at the centre of the fovea but reached 8 degrees at the periphery of the vertical meridian. Our results demonstrate that the organisation of V1 is similar in diurnal New and Old World simians, despite major variations in size, ecological niche, and timing of postnatal development across species.

Overall pattern of callosal connections in visual cortex of normal and enucleated cats

The effect of neonatal bilateral enucleation on the overall distribution of callosal connections in striate and extrastriate visual cortex of the cat was studied using tangential sections from the physically unfolded and flattened cortex. Callosal neurons were labeled by administering the anatomical tracer horseradish peroxidase directly to the transected corpus callosum. The pattern of callosal connections in binocularly enucleated cats showed both consistent differences and consistent similarities with the pattern in normal cats. In agreement with previous studies, it was found that callosal labeling at the 17/18 border of enucleated cats was considerably sparser than in normal cats. Moreover, we found that the strip containing the majority of labeled cells at the 17/18 border was narrower than in normal cats. In both normal and enucleated cats, scattered cells were distributed on either side of the 17/18 callosal strip, well into areas 17 and 18. In much of extrastriate cortex, the pattern of callosal connectivity in enucleated cats looked surprisingly normal. Details of the callosal pattern that were consistently found in normal cats could also be recognized in binocularly enucleated cats, such as two to four bridges of labeling spanning areas 18 and 19. Also, four zones that were free of callosal connectivity in area 7, on the banks of the suprasylvian sulcus, and in the posterior suprasylvian sulcus were found in both normal and enucleated cats. Finally, as in normal cats, dense cell labeling occurred on the crown of the suprasylvian gyrus at its posterior end, from which it extended laterally across both banks of the suprasylvian sulcus and into the fundus of this sulcus. The results of this study suggest that, although the stabilization of callosal connections at the 17/18 border region appears to depend on visual input, this input plays a less prominent role in the stabilization of callosal connections in extrastriate visual cortex.

Two rules for callosal connectivity in striate cortex of the rat

In the rat, callosal cells occupy lateral as well as medial portions of striate cortex. In the region of the border between areas 17 and 18, which contains a representation of the vertical meridian of the visual field, cells projecting through the corpus callosum are concentrated throughout the depth of the cortex. In contrast, in medial portion of striate cortex, where peripheral portions of the visual field are represented, callosal cells are preferentially found in infragranular layers. These differences in topography and laminar distribution suggest that these callosal regions, referred to as medial and lateral callosal regions in the present study, subserve different functions. We explored this possibility by analyzing the patterns of callosal linkages in these two callosal regions. We charted the location of retrogradely labeled cells within striate cortex of one hemisphere after placing restricted injections of one or more fluorescent tracers into selected sites in the contralateral striate cortex. We found the medial and lateral callosal regions have distinctly different topographic organizations. Injections into medial striate cortex of one hemisphere produced labeled cells predominantly in mirror-symmetric loci in medial portions of contralateral striate cortex. The arrangement of these connections suggests that they mediate direct interactions between cortical regions representing visual fields located symmetrically on opposite sides of the vertical meridian of the visual field. In contrast, the mapping in the lateral callosal region is reversed: injections into the 17/18a border produced labeled fields located medial to the contralateral 17/18a border, while injections slightly medial to the 17/18a border produced labeled fields located at the contralateral 17/18a border.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Interhemispheric connections in neonatal owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus) and galagos (Galago crassicaudatus)

Interhemispheric connections were studied by injecting a mixture of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and wheatgerm agglutinin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into multiple sites in dorsolateral occipital and parietal cortex of one cerebral hemisphere of three galagos (Galago crassicaudatus) and two owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus) within seven days of birth. Cortex was either separated from the rest of the brain, flattened and cut parallel to the surface to aid reconstructing surface-view patterns of labeled neurons and processes, or cut in standard coronal or parasagittal planes to better reveal laminar patterns of connections. In both primate species, the surface-view pattern of callosal connections in infants was remarkably adult-like. In infant owl monkeys, callosal connections were concentrated along the margin of area 18 with area 17, and only a few labeled cells were found within area 17. Other visual areas including the second visual area, V-II, and the middle temporal visual area, MT, had patchy distributions of labeled neurons that extended over large parts of the visual field representations. Primary motor, auditory, and somatosensory fields also had patchy distributions of labeled neurons, with regions of areas 3b and adjoining somatosensory fields having few callosal connections in portions that appeared to correspond with representations of the hand and foot. Results were very similar in galagos, except that newborn galagos, as in adults, had a patchy distribution of callosally projecting neurons that extended well within area 17. Furthermore, the labeled neurons were concentrated in patches that aligned with the cytochrome oxidase blobs of area 17. Finally, callosal connections were concentrated in cytochrome oxidase poor regions of area 3b.

Visual-field map in the transcallosal sending zone of area 17 in the cat

The representation of the visual field in the part of area 17 containing neurons that project axons across the corpus callosum to the contralateral hemisphere was defined in the cat. Of 1424 sites sampled along 77 electrode tracks, 768 proved to be in the callosal sending zone, which was identified by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase that had been deposited in the opposite hemisphere. The results show that the callosal sending zone has a fairly constant width of between 3 and 4 mm at most levels in area 17. However, the representation of the contralateral field at the different elevations of the visual field is not equal in this zone. The zone represents positions within 4 deg of the midline at the 0-deg horizontal meridian, and positions out to 15-deg azimuths in the upper hemifield and out to positions of 25-deg azimuth in the lower hemifield. The shape of the representation is approximately mirror-symmetric about the horizontal meridian, although there is a greater extent in the lower hemifield, which can be accounted for by the greater range of elevations (greater than 60 deg) represented there compared with the upper hemifield (approximately 40 deg). The representation in the sending zone of one hemisphere matches that present in the area 17/18 transition zone, which receives the bulk of transcallosal projections, in the opposite hemisphere. The observations on the sending zone show that callosal connections of area 17 are concerned with a vertical hour-glass-shaped region of the visual field centered on the midline. The observations suggest that in addition to interactions between neurons concerned with positions immediately adjacent to the midline, there are positions, especially high and low in the visual field, where interactions can occur between neurons that have receptive fields displaced some distance from the midline.

Cortical connections of the caudal subdivision of the dorsolateral area (V4) in monkeys

Evidence suggests that all primates have rostral and caudal subdivisions in the region of visual cortex identified as the dorsolateral area (DL) or V4. However, the connections of DL/V4 have not been examined in terms of these subdivisions. To determine the cortical connections of the caudal subdivision of DL (DLC) in squirrel monkeys, injections of the neuroanatomical tracers wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, Diamidino Yellow, and Fluoro-Gold were made in cortex rostral to V II. To aid in delineating the borders of DLC, cortex was also evaluated architectonically. Based on similar patterns of connections, DLC extends from dorsolateral to ventrolateral cortex. DLC receives strong, feedforward input from V II and projects in a feedforward fashion to the rostral subdivision of DL (DLR) and caudal inferior temporal (IT) cortex, including a separate location in the inferior temporal sulcus. DLC has weaker connections with V I, the middle temporal area (MT), cortex rostral to MT in the location of the fundal superior temporal area (FST), cortex dorsal to DLC, ventral cortex rostral to V II, and cortex in the frontal lobe, lateral to the inferior arcuate sulcus. Only lateral DLC has connections with V I, and only dorsolateral DLC has connections with cortex dorsal to DLC. The topographic organization of DLC was inferred from its connections with V II. Thus, dorsolateral DLC represents the lower field, lateral DLC represents central vision, and ventrolateral DLC represents the upper field. Limited observations were made on DLR. Confirming earlier observations (Cusick and Kaas: Visual Neurosci. 1:211, 1988), DLR is paler than DLC myeloarchitectonically. DLR receives only sparse feedforward input from V II, but stronger input from DLC. DLR has strong connections with cortex just rostral to dorsal V II, ventral posterior parietal cortex in the sylvian fissure, MT, the medial superior temporal area, FST, and the inferior temporal sulcus. DLR also shares connections with IT cortex. Thus, while both DLC and DLR are involved in the pathway relaying visual information to IT cortex, an area specialized for object vision, DLR also projects densely to areas such as MT involved in the pathway relaying to posterior parietal cortex, a region specialized for spatial localization and motion perception.

Yohimbine early in life alters functional properties of interhemispheric connections of rat visual cortex

It has been shown that noradrenaline (NA) is an important regulator of normal regressive processes occurring during synaptogenesis such as cell death, axonal pruning and synaptic elimination. The present study was designed to investigate whether enhanced NA release induced by chronic yohimbine administration early in life may alter in the rat the normal pattern of functional interhemispheric connections of the visual cortex. Yohimbine administration to rats between days 5 and 16 of postnatal life (2.5 mg/kg, IP, daily) resulted in changes in the pattern of transcallosal responses evoked in the visual cortex, characterized by a reduction in the peak-to-peak amplitude as well as a reduction of the extent of projecting fields of maximal activity, when examined at 30-35 days following termination of the drug treatment regimen. The results indicate that yohimbine treatment early in life induces functional alterations in the interhemispheric connectivity of the visual areas, probably by disrupting the normal trophic role of NA during synaptogenesis.

Cortical connections of MT in four species of primates: areal, modular, and retinotopic patterns

Cortical connections were investigated by restricting injections of WGA-HRP to different parts of the middle temporal visual area, MT, in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, marmosets, and galagos. Cortex was flattened and sectioned tangentially to facilitate an analysis of the areal patterns of connections. In the experimental cases, brain sections reacted for cytochrome oxidase (CO) or stained for myelin were used to delimit visual areas of occipital and temporal cortex and visuomotor areas of the frontal lobe. Major findings are as follows: (1) The architectonic analysis suggests that in addition to the commonly recognized visual fields, area 17 (V-I), area 18 (V-II), and MT, all three New World monkeys and prosimian galagos have visual areas DL, DI, DM, MST, and FST. (2) Measurements of the size of these areas indicate that about a third of the neocortex in these primates is occupied by the eight visual areas, but they occupy a somewhat larger proportion of neocortex in the diurnal marmosets and squirrel monkeys than the nocturnal owl monkeys and galagos. The diurnal primates also have proportionally more neocortex devoted to areas 17, 18, and DL and less to MT. These differences are compatible with the view that diurnal primates are more specialized for detailed object and color vision. (3) In all four primates, restricted locations in MT receive major inputs from short meandering rows of neurons in area 17 and several bands of neurons in area 18. (4) Major feedforward projections of MT are to two visual areas adjoining the rostral half of MT, areas MST and FST. Other ipsilateral connections are with DL, DI, and in some cases DM, parts of inferotemporal (IT) cortex, and posterior parietal cortex. (5) In squirrel monkeys, where injection sites varied from caudal to rostral MT, caudal parts of MT representing central vision connect more densely to DL and IT than other parts. Both DL and IT cortex emphasize central vision. (6) In the frontal lobe, MT has dense connections with the frontal ventral area (FV), but not with the frontal eye field (FEF). (7) Callosal connections of MT are most dense with matched locations in MT of the other hemisphere, rather than with the outer boundary of MT representing the vertical meridian. Targets of sparser callosal connections include FST, MST, and DL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Callosal projection neurons in area 17 of the fetal rhesus monkey

We have studied the distribution of callosal projection neurons in area 17 of a fetal rhesus monkey which received large injections of horseradish peroxidase into the contralateral occipital cortex. In comparison to other cortical areas, area 17 contains few callosal projection neurons. Most of these cells are confined to a region extending tangentially about 2.5 mm from the 17/18 border, although a few neurons were noted as much as 5 mm from the border. Comparing the distribution of callosal projection neurons in the fetal monkey with what has been described in newborn and adult macaques, it is apparent that although some degree of refinement in striate callosal connections may occur during in utero development, the prenatal development of callosal connections in the macaque is inherently adult-like.

Representation of the visual field in the second visual area in the Cebus monkey

The representation of the visual field in the second visual area (V2) was reconstructed from multiunit visual responses and anatomical tracers. Receptive field plotting was performed during multiple recording sessions in seven Cebus apella monkeys under N2O/O2 and immobilized with pancuronium bromide. V2 forms a continuous belt of variable width around striate cortex (V1) except at the most anterior portion of the calcarine sulcus. In each hemisphere V2 contains a visuotopic representation of the contralateral visual hemifield. The representation of the vertical meridian is adjacent to that of V1 and forms the posterior border of V2. The representation of the fovea of V2 is adjacent to that of V1. The representation of the horizontal meridian (HM) is continuous with that of V1; then it splits to form the anterior border of V2, both dorsally and ventrally. The lower quadrant of the visual field is represented dorsally and the upper quadrant ventrally. The visual topography of V2 is coarser than that of V1. In V2, receptive fields corresponding to recording sites separated by a cortical distance of up to 4 mm may represent the same portion of the visual field. In three additional animals, combined injections of fluorescent tracers along the HM representation in V1 yielded two projection sites at the anterior border of V2. The split of the HM representation is estimated to occur at an eccentricity below 1 degree. Quantitative analysis showed that in V2 the representation of the central visual field is magnified relative to that of the periphery. The cortical magnification factor is greater along the isopolar dimension than along the isoeccentric one. Receptive field size in V2 increases with increasing eccentricity. In sections stained for myelin by the Heidenhein-Wöelcke method V2 can be distinguished from the surrounding cortex for most of its extent.

Cortical connections of area 18 and dorsolateral visual cortex in squirrel monkeys

Cortical connections of area 18 (V-II) and part of the dorsolateral visual area (DL) were determined in squirrel monkeys with single and multiple injections of the sensitive bidirectional tracer, wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP). Injections were placed into portions of area 18 or DL on the dorsolateral surface of the brain, patterns of label were examined in brain sections cut parallel to the surface of physically flattened cortex, and comparisons were made with alternate brain sections reacted for cytochrome oxidase (CO) or stained for myelinated fibers. Major results are as follows. (1) Area 18 was identified by a characteristic alternation of dense and light CO bands crossing its width; the middle temporal visual area (MT) was CO dense; the dorsolateral area (DL) was less reactive, with rostral DL (DLR) lighter than caudal DL (DLC); area 17 had clear CO puffs in the supragranular layers. (2) Intrinsic connections revealed in area 18 included a narrow 100-200 microns fringe of less dense label around each injection core, label unevenly distributed in small clumps within 1-2 mm of injection sites, and clumps of transported label up to 6 mm from injection sites. (3) Single and multiple injections in area 18 produced patterns of labeled cells and terminations in area 17 that ranged from lattice- to puff-like in surface-view distribution. With multiple area 18 injections, regions of area 17 could be found where transported label was concentrated in CO puffs, avoided the CO puffs, or overlapped both puff and interpuff divisions of cortex. The labeled regions of area 17 were somewhat larger than the injection sites, suggesting some convergence from area 17 to area 18. (4) The major rostral connections of area 18 were with caudal DL (DLC). Rostral DL (DLR) was largely free of transported label. Single injection sites in area 18 resulted in several large clumps of label separated by regions of sparse or no label in DLC. Injections in lateral area 18 produced lateral foci of label in DL, while more medial injections produced more medial foci. However, following multiple injections into area 18 that included the representation of central vision, a continuous 2-3-mm-wide band of infragranular labeled cells extended from area 18 caudally to MT rostrally in the presumed location of central vision in DLC and DLR. (5) Injections in area 18 produced foci of label in MT. Label was more dorsal in MT with more dorsal injection sites in area 18.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)