Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered ruxolitinib (INCB018424 phosphate) in renal and hepatic impairment patients

Development and Evaluation of Bilayer Sustained-Release Tablets of Ruxolitinib Using Discriminative Pharmacokinetic Analysis and IVIVC

Objectives: This study explores the development and evaluation of a bilayer sustained-release (SR) tablet formulation of ruxolitinib. As a BCS Class 1 drug, ruxolitinib requires twice-daily dosing due to its short half-life. We designed a bilayer tablet that integrates immediate-release (IR) and SR components in varying ratios to achieve sustained plasma concentrations, which we evaluated using discriminative analysis. Methods: Bilayer tablets combining IR and SR components were prepared in different ratios. In vitro dissolution tests and pharmacokinetic studies were conducted using Beagle dogs, followed by the evaluation of in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC), along with a discriminative pharmacokinetic analysis focused on the SR layer. Results: A discriminative pharmacokinetic and IVIVC analysis was applied to all bilayer tablets, offering clearer insights into the plasma concentration and dissolution profiles. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that test formulation F4, which has a 20:20 IR-to-SR ratio, is expected to provide a similar area under the curve (AUC) while prolonging exposure compared to the reference IR tablet. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of a bilayer tablet approach, combined with discriminative pharmacokinetic and IVIVC analysis, for creating a sustained-release dosage form of ruxolitinib.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment or Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Aficamten

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aficamten, a small-molecule, selective cardiac myosin inhibitor, is under development for the treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Aficamten is primarily eliminated by hepatic metabolism with renal excretion playing a minor role. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of aficamten in moderate hepatic impairment or mild to moderate renal impairment to inform dosing recommendations in HCM patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or mild to moderate renal impairment.

METHODS

The impact of hepatic impairment on the PK of single-dose aficamten 20 mg was evaluated in a phase 1 single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study, in healthy participants with moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B classification) versus participants with normal hepatic function (n = 8). Safety was monitored throughout. The effect of renal impairment on aficamten PK was assessed using population PK (PopPK) modelling of phase 2/3 clinical data in patients with oHCM.

RESULTS

Aficamten PK was similar in participants with moderate hepatic impairment and those with normal hepatic function. No serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were reported. There were no clinical meaningful differences in aficamten exposure in patients with oHCM with mild or moderate renal impairment and those with normal renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically relevant changes in aficamten PK were observed in participants with moderate hepatic impairment. Population PK analysis indicated mild or moderate renal impairment and had no statistically or clinically significant impact on aficamten PK in patients with oHCM. Aficamten dose adjustment may not be necessary in patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment.

Pacritinib inhibits proliferation of primary effusion lymphoma cells and production of viral interleukin-6 induced cytokines

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) and a form of multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) are both caused by Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV). There is a critical need for improved therapies for these disorders. The IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of both PEL and KSHV-MCD. We explored the potential of JAK inhibitors for use in PEL and KSHV-MCD, and found that pacritinib was superior to others in inhibiting the growth of PEL cell lines. Pacritinib induced apoptosis in PEL cells and inhibited STAT3 and NF-κB activity as evidenced by reduced amount of phosphorylated moieties. Pacritinib also inhibits FLT3, IRAK1, and ROS1; studies utilizing other inhibitors of these targets revealed that only FLT3 inhibitors exhibited similar cell growth inhibitory effects. FLT3's likely contribution to pacritinib's cell growth inhibition was further demonstrated by siRNA knockdown of FLT3. RNA sequencing and RT-PCR showed that many key host genes including cyclins and IL-6 were downregulated by pacritinib, while KSHV genes were variably altered. Finally, pacritinib suppressed KSHV viral IL-6-induced human IL-6 and IL-10 production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which may model an important step in KSHV-MCD pathogenesis. These results suggest that pacritinib warrants testing for the treatment of KSHV-MCD and PEL.

Pharmacokinetics of baricitinib in critically ill COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

The use of the selective Janus Kinase 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib has shown a survival benefit in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients but this is not without adverse drug reactions. Although critically ill patients are at risk of altered drug exposure, data on baricitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) are scarce. This study describes real-life baricitinib plasma exposure in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted in critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated with baricitinib 4 mg/day. Plasma concentrations were measured at predose (C0), 1 h (C1) and 3 h (C3) after the drug intake. PK and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

Seven patients contributed to 22 baricitinib plasma concentration measurements after a median [range] of 3 days [2-3] of treatment. Median baricitinib plasma concentrations were 2.2 ng/mL [1.4-8.0], 24.0 ng/mL [4.9-37.3] and 14.1 ng/mL [8.3-15.1] for trough (C0), C1 and C3 concentrations respectively. The median AUC 0-24h was 188.8 ng.h/mL [141.3-236.3]. No difference was observed in C0 and C1 when comparing patients according to body mass index < or > 30. The patient with the lowest glomerular filtration rate (74 mL/min) had the highest baricitinib trough concentration. Overall, 2 patients had liver function test perturbation and both of them had atypical PK with delayed time to reach maximum concentration.

CONCLUSION

High inter-patient variability and relatively low baricitinib trough concentrations and AUC were observed in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving the usual dosage of 4 mg/day. This preliminary study encourages further exploration of the concentration-effect relationship of baricitinib in this clinical context.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ruxolitinib: A Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Ruxolitinib is used to treat myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. This review describes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and web of Science were searched from the time of database inception to march 15, 2021 and was repeated on November 16, 2021. Articles not written in English, animal or in vitro studies, letters to the editor, case reports, where ruxolitinib was not used for hematological diseases or not available as full text were excluded.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib is well absorbed, has 95% bio-availability, and is bound to albumin for 97%. Ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics can be described with a two-compartment model and linear elimination. Volume of distribution differs between men and women, likely related to bodyweight differences. Metabolism is mainly hepatic via CYP3A4 and can be altered by CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. The major metabolites of ruxolitinib are pharmacologically active. The main route of elimination of ruxolitinib metabolites is renal. Liver and renal dysfunction affect some of the pharmacokinetic variables and require dose reductions. Model-informed precision dosing might be a way to further optimize and individualize ruxolitinib treatment, but is not yet advised for routine care due to lack of information on target concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to explain the interindividual variability of the ruxolitinib pharmacokinetic variables and to optimize individual treatment.

Paradoxical activation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by ruxolitinib in vitro and in vivo

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by an aberrant cytokine network that can support tumor growth by triggering janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathways. Targeting cytokine-signaling should then be a rational therapeutic strategy but the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib failed to control and seemingly accelerated the disease in clinical trials.

Methods

The effect of ruxolitinib on primary human CLL cells was studied in vitro and in vivo.

Results

Ruxolitinib increased phosphorylation of IRAK4, an important toll-like receptor (TLR)- signaling intermediate, in circulating CLL cells in vitro. It also enhanced p38 and NFKB1 phosphorylation while lowering STAT3 phosphorylation in CLL cells activated with TLR-7/8 agonists and IL-2. Among the cytokines made by activated CLL cells, high levels of IL-10 contributed strongly to STAT3 phosphorylation and inhibited TLR7 activity. Ruxolitinib limited TLR-mediated IL10 transcription and markedly reduced IL-10 production in vitro. It also decreased blood levels of IL-10 while increasing TNFα along with phospho-p38 expression and gene sets associated with TLR-activation in CLL cells in vivo. The bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib decreased IL-10 production in vitro but, in contrast to ruxolitinib, blocked initial IL10 transcription induced by TLR-signaling in vitro, decreased TNFα production, and deactivates CLL cells in vivo.

Discussion

These findings suggest the possible benefits of inhibiting growth factors with JAK inhibitors in CLL are outweighed by negative effects on potential tumor suppressors such as IL-10 that allow unrestrained activation of NFκB by drivers such as TLRs. Specific inhibition of growth-promoting cytokines with blocking antibodies or infusing suppressive cytokines like IL-10 might be better strategies to manipulate cytokines in CLL.

Combined IFN-γ and JAK inhibition to treat hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in mice

BACKGROUND

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory disease caused by genetic defects in the granule-mediated cytotoxic pathway. Success of hematopoietic cell transplantation, the only cure, is correlated with the extent of disease control before transplantation. Unfortunately, disease refractoriness and toxicities to standard chemotherapy-based regimens are fatal in a fraction of patients. Novel targeted immunotherapies, such as IFN-γ blocking antibodies or ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, are promising but only partially effective at controlling disease.

OBJECTIVE

We asked whether combinations of cytokine-targeted therapies, using antibodies or JAK inhibitor, work synergistically to counteract HLH.

METHODS

Genetically predisposed mice were infected and treated with distinct combinations of immunotherapies. Disease outcome was monitored and compared to monotherapies.

RESULTS

We showed that inhibiting IL-6 or IL-18 signaling in combination with IFN-γ blockade or ruxolitinib did not increase disease control compared to anti-IFN-γ antibodies or ruxolitinib monotherapies. In contrast, clinically relevant doses of ruxolitinib combined with low doses of anti-IFN-γ blocking antibodies corrected cytopenias, prevented overt neutrophilia, limited cytokinemia, and resolved HLH immunopathology and symptomatology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that IFN-γ blockade and ruxolitinib act synergistically to suppress HLH progression. This supports the use of combined cytokine-targeted therapies as a bridge to hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Ruxolitinib and Posaconazole to Predict CYP3A4-Mediated Drug-Drug Interaction Frequently Observed in Graft versus Host Disease Patients

Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD). It is predominantly metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As patients with GvHD have an increased risk of invasive fungal infections, RUX is frequently combined with posaconazole (POS), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Knowledge of RUX exposure under concomitant POS treatment is scarce and recommendations on dose modifications are inconsistent. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to investigate the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between POS and RUX. The predicted RUX exposure was compared to observed concentrations in patients with GvHD in the clinical routine. PBPK models for RUX and POS were independently set up using PK-Sim^® Version 11. Plasma concentration-time profiles were described successfully and all predicted area under the curve (AUC) values were within 2-fold of the observed values. The increase in RUX exposure was predicted with a DDI ratio of 1.21 (C_max) and 1.59 (AUC). Standard dosing in patients with GvHD led to higher RUX exposure than expected, suggesting further dose reduction if combined with POS. The developed model can serve as a starting point for further simulations of the implemented DDI and can be extended to further perpetrators of CYP-mediated PK-DDIs or disease-specific physiological changes.

Development and application of an LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic study of ruxolitinib in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Ruxolitinib (RUX), a small molecule inhibitor of JAK1/JAK2, has been identified as the possible novel targeted agent for the treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). However, due to the lack of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), it is extremely difficult to determine the effective therapeutic dose for RUX in HLH patients, especially in pediatric patients. At the same time, the clinical response of pediatric patients to RUX varies greatly among individuals according to several case reports. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of RUX in HLH children, and this must be based on a satisfactory method to determine the concentration of RUX. Owing to several limits of published analytical methods, herein, we describe a novel liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for monitoring RUX in children's plasma samples. The protein precipitation method using methanol was used for sample cleanup. The analytes were separated by gradient elution in which 2.0 mM ammonium acetate in distilled water and acetonitrile were used as mobile phases. In the positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) mode, the m/z 307.1 → 186.0 and 316.1 → 185.9 ion pair transitions of RUX and RUX-d9 were used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis, respectively. The calibration curves of RUX were linear in the concentration range from 0.5 to 400 ng mL^-1. The intra- and inter-batch precision, accuracy, recovery, dilution completeness, and stability of this method were all within acceptable standards, and no matrix effects or residues were found. This method was successfully applied to the clinical pharmacokinetic study of RUX in 32 children with HLH. The pharmacokinetic parameters of HLH children after a single dose of RUX and the steady state plasma concentration after multiple administrations were proposed through this method. Most importantly, it was found that the age and serum creatinine (SCr) of children with HLH had a significant and complex impact on the in vivo process of RUX after the single as well as multiple administrations of RUX.

Proteomic cellular signatures of kinase inhibitor-induced cardiotoxicity

Drug Toxicity Signature Generation Center (DToxS) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is one of the centers for the NIH Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS) program. Its key aim is to generate proteomic and transcriptomic signatures that can predict cardiotoxic adverse effects of kinase inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Towards this goal, high throughput shotgun proteomics experiments (308 cell line/drug combinations +64 control lysates) have been conducted. Using computational network analyses, these proteomic data can be integrated with transcriptomic signatures, generated in tandem, to identify cellular signatures of cardiotoxicity that may predict kinase inhibitor-induced toxicity and enable possible mitigation. Both raw and processed proteomics data have passed several quality control steps and been made publicly available on the PRIDE database. This broad protein kinase inhibitor-stimulated human cardiomyocyte proteomic data and signature set is valuable for prediction of drug toxicities.

Jakinibs of All Trades: Inhibiting Cytokine Signaling in Immune-Mediated Pathologies

Over the last 25 years, inhibition of Janus kinases (JAKs) has been pursued as a modality for treating various immune and inflammatory disorders. While the clinical development of JAK inhibitors (jakinibs) began with the investigation of their use in allogeneic transplantation, their widest successful application came in autoimmune and allergic diseases. Multiple molecules have now been approved for diseases ranging from rheumatoid and juvenile arthritis to ulcerative colitis, atopic dermatitis, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and other inflammatory pathologies in 80 countries around the world. Moreover, two jakinibs have also shown surprising efficacy in the treatment of hospitalized coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients, indicating additional roles for jakinibs in infectious diseases, cytokine storms and other hyperinflammatory syndromes. Jakinibs, as a class of pharmaceutics, continue to expand in clinical applications and with the development of more selective JAK-targeting and organ-selective delivery. Importantly, jakinib safety and pharmacokinetics have been investigated alongside clinical development, further cementing the potential benefits and limits of jakinib use. This review covers jakinibs that are approved or are under late phase investigation, focusing on clinical applications, pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, and future opportunities and challenges.

Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial

Purpose

Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects.

Methods

262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed.

Results

Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6–99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-021-04351-w.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat in the presence of cancer, renal impairment, and hepatic impairment

Renal (RIP) and hepatic (HIP) impairments are prevalent conditions in cancer patients. They can cause changes in gastric emptying time, albumin levels, hematocrit, glomerular filtration rate, hepatic functional volume, blood flow rates, and metabolic activity that can modify drug pharmacokinetics. Performing clinical studies in such populations has ethical and practical issues. Using predictive physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in the evaluation of the PK of alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat exposures in the presence of cancer, RIP, and HIP can help in using optimal doses with lower toxicity in these populations. Verified PBPK models were customized under scrutiny to account for the pathophysiological changes induced in these diseases. The PBPK model-predicted plasma exposures in patients with different health conditions within average 2-fold error. The PBPK model predicted an area under the curve ratio (AUCR) of 1, and 1.8, for ruxolitinib and panobinostat, respectively, in the presence of severe RIP. On the other hand, the severe HIP was associated with AUCR of 1.4, 2.9, and 1.8 for alectinib, ruxolitinib, and panobinostat, respectively, in agreement with the observed AUCR. Moreover, the PBPK model predicted that alectinib therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid levels are achieved in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, moderate HIP, and severe HIP at 1-, 1.5-, and 1.8-fold that of healthy subjects. The customized PBPK models showed promising ethical alternatives for simulating clinical studies in patients with cancer, RIP, and HIP. More work is needed to quantify other pathophysiological changes induced by simultaneous affliction by cancer and RIP or HIP.

Pharmacokinetics under the COVID-19 storm

AIMS

The storm-like nature of the health crises caused by COVID-19 has led to unconventional clinical trial practices such as the relaxation of exclusion criteria. The question remains: how can we conduct diverse trials without exposing subgroups of populations to potentially harmful drug exposure levels? The aim of this study was to build a knowledge base of the effect of intrinsic/extrinsic factors on the disposition of several repurposed COVID-19 drugs.

METHODS

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were used to study the change in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs repurposed for COVID-19 in geriatric patients, different race groups, organ impairment and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) risks. These models were also used to predict epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposure, which is relevant for COVID-19 patients under elevated cytokine levels.

RESULTS

The simulated PK profiles suggest no dose adjustments are required based on age and race for COVID-19 drugs, but dose adjustments may be warranted for COVID-19 patients also exhibiting hepatic/renal impairment. PBPK model simulations suggest ELF exposure to attain a target concentration was adequate for most drugs, except for hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that systematically collated data on absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, human PK parameters, DDIs and organ impairment can be used to verify simulated plasma and lung tissue exposure for drugs repurposed for COVID-19, justifying broader patient recruitment criteria. In addition, the PBPK model developed was used to study the effect of age and ethnicity on the PK of repurposed drugs, and to assess the correlation between lung exposure and relevant potency values from in vitro studies for SARS-CoV-2.

Complex Autoinflammatory Syndrome Unveils Fundamental Principles of JAK1 Kinase Transcriptional and Biochemical Function

Autoinflammatory disease can result from monogenic errors of immunity. We describe a patient with early-onset multi-organ immune dysregulation resulting from a mosaic, gain-of-function mutation (S703I) in JAK1, encoding a kinase essential for signaling downstream of >25 cytokines. By custom single-cell RNA sequencing, we examine mosaicism with single-cell resolution. We find that JAK1 transcription was predominantly restricted to a single allele across different cells, introducing the concept of a mutational "transcriptotype" that differs from the genotype. Functionally, the mutation increases JAK1 activity and transactivates partnering JAKs, independent of its catalytic domain. S703I JAK1 is not only hypermorphic for cytokine signaling but also neomorphic, as it enables signaling cascades not canonically mediated by JAK1. Given these results, the patient was treated with tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, leading to the rapid resolution of clinical disease. These findings offer a platform for personalized medicine with the concurrent discovery of fundamental biological principles.

Ruxolitinib therapy for myelofibrosis in Austria : Consensus on therapy management

The oral Janus associated kinase (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib has been available for treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis in Europe since 2012. Since its introduction, the expertise of prescribing doctors with respect to ruxolitinib function, efficacy and adverse effects has consistently been augmented, resulting in therapy modalities that are better tailored to individual patients as well as in increased safety of the treatment. The present consensus on ruxolitinib therapy management has been elaborated by Austrian experts in myeloproliferative neoplasms in line with international treatment guidelines. Our recommendations aim to contribute to an improved management of patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib.

Recommendations on the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a severe disease, with decreased life expectancy and heavy symptom burden. Ruxolitinib is the only approved pharmacotherapy for the treatment of MF patients. In Belgium, ruxolitinib is only reimbursed for MF patients with splenomegaly for whom the disease is categorized as intermediate-2 or high risk. The improvement of symptoms without spleen volume reduction is not considered sufficient to continue treatment. The aim of this manuscript is to provide guidance for the safe and effective administration of ruxolitinib, considering the particularities of the Belgian reimbursement criteria.

METHODS

Our recommendations are based on a consensus reached during two meetings, where available data and observations derived from clinical experience were discussed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We recommend changing the current Belgian reimbursement conditions to include the evaluation of disease-related symptoms along with splenomegaly to decide whether ruxolitinib treatment should be continued or not. Indeed, the decrease in disease-related symptoms seems to be an equally important parameter as the decrease in splenic volume in the evaluation of the response to ruxolitinib. We also advocate for the treatment with ruxolitinib of MF patients in lower-risk categories with severe disease-related symptoms, as this drug could greatly improve their quality of life. Optimization of the ruxolitinib dose is recommended to avoid an unnecessary decrease in platelet count or hemoglobin that may jeopardize treatment continuation.

CONCLUSION

With the aim to optimize the treatment of MF patients, the Belgian regulation for ruxolitinib should be revised in terms of reimbursement criteria, dose titration, stopping rules, and patient follow-up.

Ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis: to be or not to be an immune disruptor

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm classified according to the 2016 revision of World Health Organization Classification of Tumors and Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue. Ruxolitinib is an oral inhibitor of Janus kinase approved in the USA for the treatment of intermediate or high-risk PMF and approved in Europe for the treatment of splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms of the disease. More recently, case reports described serious opportunistic infections in this neoplasm treated with ruxolitinib. Research studies demonstrated the immunological derangement of this compound mainly based on T, dendritic, and natural killer cell defects. The purpose of this review of the literature was to analyze the relationship among ruxolitinib, immune system and bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoan infections. A literature search was conducted using PubMed articles published between January 2010 and November 2016. The efficacy of drug in patients with PMF was demonstrated in two phase III studies, Controlled MyeloFibrosis Study with ORal Jak inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were recognized in 7.1% and 2% of patients in the ruxolitinib and placebo arm of COMFORT-I. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or leukopenia were observed in 8.9% and 6.3% of ruxolitinib treated patients of 5-year follow-up of COMFORT-II. In addition, leukocyte subpopulations, lymphocyte functions, or antibody deficiency were not documented in either of the studies. The complex interactions between ruxolitinib, bone marrow, immune system, and infections in PMF need further investigation, robust data from a randomized clinical trial, registry, or large case-series.

Ruxolitinib in the treatment of polycythemia vera: patient selection and special considerations

The discovery of JAK2 V617F mutation in the mid-2000s started to fill the gap between clinical presentation of polycythemia vera (PV), first described by Vaquez at the end of the 19th century, and spontaneous erythroid colony formation, reported by Prchal and Axelrad in the mid-1970s. The knowledge on this mutation brought an important insight to our understanding of PV pathogenesis and led to a revision of the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria in 2008. JAK-STAT is a major signaling pathway implicated in survival and proliferation of hematopoietic precursors. High prevalence of JAK2 V617F mutation among myeloproliferative neoplasms (>95% in PV and ~50% in primary myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia) together with its role in constitutively activating JAK-STAT made JAK2 a privileged therapeutic target. Ruxolitinib, a JAK 1 and 2 inhibitor, has already proven to be efficient in relieving symptoms in primary myelofibrosis and PV. In the latter, it also appears to improve microvascular involvement. However, evidence regarding its potential role in altering the natural course of PV and its use as an adjunct to current standard therapies is sparse. Therapeutic advances are needed in PV as phlebotomy, low-dose aspirin, cytoreductive agents, and interferon alpha are the only therapeutic tools available at the moment to influence outcome. Even though several questions are still unanswered, this review aims to serve as an overview article of the potential role of ruxolitinib in PV according to current literature and expert opinion. It should help hematologists to visualize the place of this tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the field of current practice and offer criteria for a careful patient selection.

Ruxolitinib: a targeted treatment option for patients with polycythemia vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis and the presence of Janus kinase (JAK) 2V617F or similar mutations. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of PV, the challenges associated with traditional treatment options, and the scientific rationale and supportive clinical evidence for targeted therapy with ruxolitinib. Accumulating evidence indicates that activating mutations in JAK2 drive the PV disease state. Traditional PV treatment strategies, including aspirin, phlebotomy, and cytoreduc­tive agents such as hydroxyurea, provide clinical benefits for some but not all patients and may not adequately treat PV-related symptoms. Furthermore, traditional treatment approaches are associated with potential side effects that may limit their usage and lead some patients to discon­tinue the treatment. Ruxolitinib is an orally available small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is a potent and selective inhibitor of JAK1/JAK2. Ruxolitinib is approved in the US for patients with PV with an inadequate response or intolerance to hydroxyurea and in Europe for adults with PV who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. In the Phase III RESPONSE registration trial, ruxolitinib was superior to the best available therapy in patients with PV who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea in controlling hematocrit levels, reducing spleen volume, and improving PV-related symptoms and quality-of-life measures. The most common nonhematologic adverse events in ruxolitinib-treated patients were headache, diarrhea, pruritus, and fatigue in the RESPONSE trial; hematologic adverse events were primarily grade 1 or 2. In the Phase IIIb nonregistration RELIEF trial, there were nonsignificant trends toward an improved symptom control in patients with PV on a stable hydroxyurea dose who were generally well controlled but reported disease-associated symptoms and switched to ruxolitinib vs those who continued hydroxyurea therapy. Updated treatment guidelines will be important for educating physicians about the role of ruxolitinib in the treatment of patients with PV.

Overcoming treatment challenges in myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera: the role of ruxolitinib

Myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV) are BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with somatic hematopoietic stem cell mutations leading to over activation of JAK-STAT signaling. MF and PV are pathogenically related and share specific clinical features such as splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. The MF phenotype is dominated by the effects of progressive bone marrow fibrosis resulting in shortened survival. In contrast, elevated thrombosis risk due to erythrocytosis is the primary clinical concern in PV. Ruxolitinib, an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk MF and patients with PV who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea. For MF, results of two phase III studies demonstrated that ruxolitinib therapy reduced spleen volume and MF-related symptom burden, improved quality-of-life measures, and was associated with prolonged overall survival. Treatment benefits were generally sustained with continued therapy. Dose-dependent cytopenias were common but generally manageable with transfusions (for anemia), dose reduction, or treatment interruption. Optimal dosing management is critical to maintain long-term treatment benefit, because cessation of therapy resulted in rapid return of symptoms to baseline levels. Results of the phase III PV trial showed that ruxolitinib was significantly more effective than standard therapy in controlling hematocrit levels and improving splenomegaly and PV-related symptoms. Only 1 of 110 patients in the ruxolitinib arm compared with 6 of 112 patients in the control arm experienced a thromboembolic event through week 32. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were uncommon.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a hematopoietic proliferative disorder associated with Janus-associated kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway dysregulation resulting in erythrocytosis and, possibly, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. Patients diagnosed with PV experience a broad range of symptoms associated with a reduced quality of life, often develop splenomegaly, and have an increased risk of death compared with age-matched subjects without PV. Current treatment options, notably hydroxyurea, help with disease management; however, insufficient efficacy or progressive resistance occurs in some patients, highlighting the need for new treatment options. Ruxolitinib is an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has been evaluated in Phase II and III clinical trials in patients with PV, who are intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea. In this setting, ruxolitinib treatment has demonstrated normalization of blood cell counts, reduction in splenomegaly and improvements in PV-related symptom burden.