Human mesenchymal stem-derived extracellular vesicles improve body growth and motor function following severe spinal cord injury in rat

Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles: Therapeutic Mechanisms for Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Repair Following Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) exacerbating damage by allowing harmful substances and immune cells to infiltrate spinal neural tissues from the vasculature. This leads to inflammation, oxidative stress, and impaired axonal regeneration. The BSCB, essential for maintaining spinal cord homeostasis, is structurally similar to the blood-brain barrier. Its restoration is a key therapeutic target for improving outcomes in SCI. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) and their secreted extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have gained attention for their regenerative, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory properties in promoting BSCB repair. MSCs enhance BSCB integrity by improving endothelial-pericyte association, restoring tight junction proteins, and reducing inflammation. MSC-EVs, which deliver bioactive molecules, replicate many of MSCs' therapeutic effects, and offer a promising cell-free alternative. Preclinical studies have shown that both MSCs and MSC-EVs can reduce BSCB permeability, promote vascular stability, and support functional recovery. While MSC therapy is advancing in clinical trials, MSC-EV therapies require further optimization in terms of production, dosing, and delivery protocols. Despite these challenges, both therapeutic approaches represent significant potential for treating SCI by targeting BSCB repair and improving patient outcomes.

Natural and bio-engineered stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for spinal cord injury repair: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Stem-cell derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have shown promise in preclinical spinal cord injury (SCI) models but lack a comprehensive literature review for clinical translation guidance.

METHODS

This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis systematically search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Prespecified inclusion criteria were studies reporting on measurable outcomes relevant to SCI repair. Risk of bias and quality of reporting were assessed. Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses comparing natural and bio-engineered EVs were performed. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024512122).

FINDINGS

The search identified 3935 records, of which 39 studies were included, totaling 1801 animals. Administration of EVs significantly improved locomotor function as measured by Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan or Basso-Mouse-Scale scores at 1 week (natural EVs: SMD 1.50, 95 % CI 1.06-1.95; bio-engineered EVs: SMD 1.93, 95 % CI 1.34-2.52) and 3 weeks (natural EVs: SMD 2.57, 95 % CI 1.96-3.17; bio-engineered EVs: SMD 3.16, 95 % CI 2.29-4.02) post-injury. Subgroup analyses indicated surface modification approaches were most effective among bio-engineered EV strategies. EVs also promoted nerve growth (SMD 2.95, 95 % CI 2.12-3.78), enhanced neuron conductivity (MD 0.75, 95 %CI 0.59-0.90), alleviated inflammation (SMD -3.12, 95 % CI -4.15--2.10), and reduced lesion size (SMD -2.90, 95 % CI -3.87--1.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Both natural and bio-engineered EVs improve functional and pathological outcomes in animal models of SCI. The enhanced benefits observed with bio-engineered EVs, particularly those utilizing surface modification approaches, highlight the importance of continued exploration into bio-engineering techniques to optimize EVs' therapeutic efficacy for SCI repair. Protocol Registration CRD42024512122.

Repair of spinal cord injury by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on rat models

Objective

This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (BMSCs-Exo) in improving spinal cord injury (SCI) to mitigate the risk of translational discrepancies from animal experiments to clinical applications.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search up to March 2024 using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies. Data analysis was performed using STATA16 software.

Results

A total of 30 studies were included. The results indicated that BMSCs-Exo significantly improved the BBB score in SCI rats (WMD = 3.47, 95% CI [3.31, 3.63]), inhibited the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α (SMD = -3.12, 95% CI [-3.57, -2.67]), and promoted the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 (SMD = 2.76, 95% CI [1.88, 3.63]) and TGF-β (SMD = 3.89, 95% CI [3.02, 4.76]). Additionally, BMSCs-Exo significantly reduced apoptosis levels (SMD = -4.52, 95% CI [-5.14, -3.89]), promoted the expression of axonal regeneration markers NeuN cells/field (SMD = 3.54, 95% CI [2.65, 4.42]), NF200 (SMD = 4.88, 95% CI [3.70, 6.05]), and the number of Nissl bodies (SMD = 1.89, 95% CI [1.13, 2.65]), and decreased the expression of astrogliosis marker GFAP (SMD = -5.15, 95% CI [-6.47, -3.82]). The heterogeneity among studies was primarily due to variations in BMSCs-Exo transplantation doses, with efficacy increasing with higher doses.

Conclusion

BMSCs-Exo significantly improved motor function in SCI rats by modulating inflammatory responses, reducing apoptosis, inhibiting astrogliosis, and promoting axonal regeneration. However, the presence of selection, performance, and detection biases in current animal experiments may undermine the quality of evidence in this study.

Immune Privileges as a Result of Mutual Regulation of Immune and Stem Systems

Immune privileges of cancer stem cells is a well-known and widely studied problem, as presence of such cells in tumors is associated with refractoriness, recurrence, and metastasis. Accumulating evidence also suggests presence of immune privileges in non-pathological stem cells in addition to their other defense mechanisms against damaging factors. This similarity between pathological and normal stem cells raises the question of why stem cells have such a potentially dangerous property. Regulation of vital processes of autoimmunity control and regeneration realized through interactions between immune cells, stem cells, and their microenvironment are reviewed in this work as causes of formation of the stem cell immune privilege. Deep mutual integration between regulations of stem and immune cells is noted. Considering diversity and complexity of mutual regulation of stem cells, their microenvironment, and immune system, I suggest the term "stem system".