1
|
Pârvulescu L, Iorgu EI, Zaharia C, Ion MC, Satmari A, Krapal AM, Popa OP, Miok K, Petrescu I, Popa LO. The future of endangered crayfish in light of protected areas and habitat fragmentation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14870. [PMID: 32913322 PMCID: PMC7483723 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71915-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The long-term survival of a species requires, among other things, gene flow between populations. Approaches for the evaluation of fragmentation in the frame of freshwater habitats consider only a small amount of the information that combined demography and geography are currently able to provide. This study addresses two species of Austropotamobius crayfish in the light of population genetics, spatial ecology and protected areas of the Carpathians. Advancing the classical approaches, we defined ecological distances upon the rasterised river network as a surrogate of habitat resistance to migration, quantifying the deviations from the species´ suitability range for a set of relevant geospatial variables in each cell of the network. Molecular analyses revealed the populations of the two Austropotamobius crayfish species are clearly distinct, lacking hybridisation. Comparing pairs of populations, we found, in some cases, a strong disagreement regarding genetic and ecological distances, potentially due to human-mediated translocations or the geophysical phenomena of regressive erosion, which may have led to unexpected colonisation routes. Protected areas were found to offer appropriate local habitat conditions but failed to ensure connectivity. The methodology applied in this study allowed us to quantify the contribution of each geospatial (environmental) variable to the overall effect of fragmentation, and we found that water quality was the most important variable. A multilevel approach proved to reveal a better understanding of drivers behind the distribution patterns, which can lead to more adequate conservation measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Pârvulescu
- Department of Biology-Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timisoara, 300115, Timisoara, Romania.
| | - Elena-Iulia Iorgu
- "Grigore Antipa" National Museum of Natural History, 011341, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Claudia Zaharia
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, West University of Timisoara, 300223, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Mihaela C Ion
- Institute of Biology Bucharest, Romanian Academy, 060031, Bucharest, Romania
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 050095, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alina Satmari
- Department of Geography, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, West University of Timisoara, 300223, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ana-Maria Krapal
- "Grigore Antipa" National Museum of Natural History, 011341, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Oana-Paula Popa
- "Grigore Antipa" National Museum of Natural History, 011341, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Kristian Miok
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, West University of Timisoara, 300223, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Iorgu Petrescu
- "Grigore Antipa" National Museum of Natural History, 011341, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Luis-Ovidiu Popa
- "Grigore Antipa" National Museum of Natural History, 011341, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|