Benefits and harms of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS-I) versus SGLT2-Is alone in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs according to baseline blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: a systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

Using a systematic meta-analysis, we investigated if patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with varying baseline blood pressure (BP) differ in the cardiorenal benefits received from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. The differential treatment effect by baseline BP category within each trial was estimated as the ratio of the HR (RHR) and pooled. Results: Seventeen publications based on 9 unique CVOTs (4 SGLT-2is and 5 GLP-1RAs) were eligible. In participants with normal baseline BP, comparing SGLT-2is with placebo, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.88 (0.79-0.97) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 0.73 (0.59-0.91) for heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 0.78 (0.65-0.94) for composite CVD death/HF hospitalization, and 0.55 (0.41-0.73) for composite renal outcome. The corresponding estimates for participants with higher baseline BP were 0.88 (0.81-0.96), 0.67 (0.57-0.79), 0.73 (0.65-0.82), and 0.61 (0.48-0.77), respectively. In participants with normal baseline BP, GLP-RAs had no strong effect on MACE, stroke and nephropathy, but reduced stroke and nephropathy risk in those with higher baseline BP. Estimated RHRs showed no statistical evidence that baseline BP modified the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. Conclusions: In patients with T2D, the cardiorenal benefits of treatment with SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs were similar in patients with normal baseline BP compared to those with a higher baseline BP.

Nephroprotective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a real-world population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the nephroprotective effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension based on real-world clinical data. The study aimed to provide a theoretical basis for evidence-based pharmacological treatment of chronic kidney disease in this population.

METHODS

The 'Health Cloud' platform of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission was employed to identify and screen elderly patients with T2DM and hypertension. The propensity score matching cohort was further constructed to estimate the effect of SGLT2i on the risk of rapid decline in renal function (∆eGFR≤-5 mL/min/1.73 m2 or ∆eGFR%≤-5%). Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, no significant differences of covariates were identified between the SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i groups. The results of multivariate logistic models demonstrated a consistent and inverse correlation between SGLT2i use and the risk of rapid eGFR decline, whether defined as ∆eGFR≤-5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI:0.38-0.96) or ∆eGFR%≤-5% (OR = 0.57, 95% CI:0.37-0.89). In the stratification of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) treatment, SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of rapid eGFR decline in the RASi group (all ORs < 1, p < 0.05), with no interaction between SGLT2i and RASi (all P for interaction > 0.05) detected.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i significantly reduced the risk of rapid eGFR decline in elderly patients with T2DM and hypertension, but the synergistic effect with RASi remains unclear.

Applications of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycaemic control

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were initially developed for their glucose-lowering effects and have shown a modest glycaemic benefit in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the past decade, a series of large, robust clinical trials of these therapies have demonstrated striking beneficial effects for various care goals, transforming the chronic disease therapeutic landscape. Cardiovascular safety studies in people with T2DM demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. Subsequent trials in participants with heart failure with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on heart failure outcomes. In dedicated kidney outcome studies, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the incidence of kidney failure among participants with or without diabetes. Post hoc analyses have suggested a range of other benefits of these drugs in conditions as diverse as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, kidney stone prevention and anaemia. SGLT2 inhibitors have a generally favourable adverse effect profile, although patient selection and medication counselling remain important. Concerted efforts are needed to better integrate these agents into routine care and support long-term medication adherence to close the gap between clinical trial outcomes and those achieved in the real world.

Racial, ethnic and regional differences in the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

OBJECTIVES

The cardiorenal protective effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) across racial and ethnic groups are not well defined. By conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes trials (CVOTs), we aimed to compare racial/ethnic as well as regional patterns in the effects of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

DESIGN

Trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and search of bibliographies to 7 July 2023. Setting North America, South/Central America, Europe (Eastern and Western), Asia, Australia-New Zealand (Pacific), Asia/Pacific, and Africa.

SETTING

North America, South/Central America, Europe (Eastern and Western), Asia, Australia-New Zealand (Pacific), Asia/Pacific, and Africa.

PARTICIPANTS

people with type 2 diabetes enrolled in cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were (i) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), (ii) composite CVD death/heart failure (HF) hospitalization; (iii) composite renal outcome; and (iv) their components. Study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

In total, 14 unique CVOTs (7 comparing SGLT2-Is vs placebo and 7 comparing GLP1-RAs vs placebo) were eligible. The proportion of participants enrolled in the trials ranged from 66.6-93.2% for White populations, 1.2-21.6% for Asian populations, 2.4-8.3% for Black populations and 0.9-23.1% for Other populations. The HR (95% CI) for MACE comparing SGLT2-Is vs placebo was 0.92 (0.86-0.98), 0.69 (0.53-0.92) and 0.70 (0.54-0.91) for White, Asian and Hispanic/Latino populations, respectively. Comparing GLP1-RAs vs placebo, the corresponding HR (95% CI) was 0.88 (0.80-0.97), 0.76 (0.63-0.93) and 0.82 (0.70-0.95), respectively. SGLT2-Is reduced the risk of all other cardiorenal outcomes in White and Asian populations, except for HF hospitalizations in Asians. No effects were observed in Black populations except for a reduced risk of HF hospitalizations by SGLT2-I. SGLT1-Is reduced the risk of composite CVD death/HF hospitalization in North America and Europe, whereas GLP1-RAs reduced the risk of MACE in Europe. GRADE certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be substantial racial/ethnic differences in the cardiorenal effects of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs in patients with T2D, with consistent benefits observed among White and Asian populations and consistent lack of benefits in Black populations. Whether the differences are due to issues with under-representation of Black populations and low statistical power or racial/ethnic variations in the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs need further investigation.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023401734.

Autonomic modulation by SGLT2i or DPP4i in patients with diabetes favors cardiovascular outcomes as revealed by skin sympathetic nerve activity

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are important second-line treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients taking SGLT2i have favorable cardiovascular outcomes via various mechanisms, including autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation. This study aimed to use neuro-electrocardiography (neuECG) to test the effects of SGLT2i or DPP4i on the ANS.

Methods

Patients with T2DM, who did not reach target hemoglobin (Hb)A1C levels despite metformin treatment, were enrolled. SGLT2i or DPP4i were prescribed randomly unless a compelling indication was present. NeuECG and heart rate were recorded for 10 min before and after a 3-month treatment. The patients were treated according to standard practice and the obtained data for skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) and ANS entropy were analyzed offline.

Results

We enrolled 96 patients, of which 49 received SGLT2i and 47 received DPP4i. The baseline parameters were similar between the groups. No adverse event was seen during the study period. In the burst analysis of SKNA at baseline, all parameters were similar. After the 3-month treatment, the firing frequency was higher in SGLT2i group (0.104 ± 0.045 vs 0.083 ± 0.033 burst/min, p < 0.05), with increased long firing duration (7.34 ± 3.66 vs 5.906 ± 2.921, p < 0.05) in 3-s aSKNA scale; the other parameters did not show any significant change. By symbolic entropy, the most complex patterns (Rank 3) were found to be significantly higher in SGLT2i-treated patients than in DDP4i-treated group (0.084 ± 0.028 vs 0.07 ± 0.024, p = 0.01) and the direction of change in Rank 3, after SGLT2i treatment, was opposite to that observed in the DDP4i group (0.012 ± 0.036 vs. -0.005 ± 0.037, p = 0.024). Our findings demonstrated the favorable autonomic modulation by SGLTi and the detrimental effects of DPP4i on ANS.

Conclusion

We demonstrated the autonomic modulation by SGLTi and DPP4i using SKNA in patients with DM, which might provide insights into the favorable outcomes of SGLT2i. Furthermore, we refined the analytical methods of neuECG, which uses SKNA to evaluate autonomic function.

Combination therapy for kidney disease in people with diabetes mellitus

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), defined as co-existing diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the absence of other clear causes of kidney injury, occurs in approximately 20-40% of patients with diabetes mellitus. As the global prevalence of diabetes has increased, DKD has become highly prevalent and a leading cause of kidney failure, accelerated cardiovascular disease, premature mortality and global health care expenditure. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to DKD, and single lifestyle or pharmacological interventions have shown limited efficacy at preserving kidney function. For nearly two decades, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were the only available kidney-protective drugs. However, several new drug classes, including sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist and a selective endothelin receptor antagonist, have now been demonstrated to improve kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, emerging preclinical and clinical evidence of the kidney-protective effects of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists has led to the prospective testing of these agents for DKD. Research and clinical efforts are geared towards using therapies with potentially complementary efficacy in combination to safely halt kidney disease progression. As more kidney-protective drugs become available, the outlook for people living with DKD should improve in the next few decades.

Hypertension and Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

Hypertension represents one of the primary and most common risk factors leading to the development of heart failure (HF) across the entire spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. A large body of evidence has demonstrated that adequate blood pressure (BP) control can reduce cardiovascular events, including the development of HF. Although the pathophysiological and epidemiological role of hypertension in the development of HF is well and largely known, some critical issues still deserve to be clarified, including BP targets, particularly in HF patients. Indeed, the management of hypertension in HF relies on the extrapolation of findings from high-risk hypertensive patients in the general population and not from specifically designed studies in HF populations. In patients with hypertension and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), it is recommended to combine drugs with documented outcome benefits and BP-lowering effects. In patients with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), a therapeutic strategy with all major antihypertensive drug classes is recommended. Besides commonly used antihypertensive drugs, different evidence suggests that other drugs recommended in HF for the beneficial effect on cardiovascular outcomes exert advantageous blood pressure-lowering actions. In this regard, type 2 sodium glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to induce BP-lowering actions that favorably affect cardiac afterload, ventricular arterial coupling, cardiac efficiency, and cardiac reverse remodeling. More recently, it has been demonstrated that finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, reduces new-onset HF and improves other HF outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, irrespective of a history of HF. Other proposed agents, such as endothelin receptor antagonists, have provided contrasting results in the management of hypertension and HF. A novel, promising strategy could be represented by small interfering RNA, whose actions are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials.

Blood pressure levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Existing data on the association between blood pressure levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) are inconsistent. The optimal blood pressure targets for patients with HF remain uncertain. This study sought to assess the associations between blood pressure (systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) levels and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to 5 May 2023. The outcomes of interest included adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Forty-three unique observational cohort studies, comprising 120 643 participants with HF, were included. The pooled RRs (95% CIs) for SBP thresholds of ≥140 mmHg versus <140 mmHg were 0.92 (0.83-1.01) for all-cause mortality, 0.83 (0.67-1.04) for CVD death, and 0.98 (0.80-1.21) for HF hospitalization. The pooled RR (95% CI) for SBP thresholds of ≥160 mmHg versus <160 mmHg and all-cause mortality was 0.67 (0.62-0.74). SBP levels below <130, <120, and <110 mmHg were each associated with an increased risk of various cardiovascular endpoints and all-cause mortality. The pooled RR (95% CI) for DBP thresholds of ≥80 mmHg versus <80 mmHg and all-cause mortality was 0.86 (0.67-1.10). A 10 mmHg increase in SBP or DBP was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality and other cardiovascular endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that lower and normal baseline SBP levels (<130, <120, and <110 mmHg) may be associated with future risk of worse outcomes in patients with HF. Optimal baseline blood pressure levels for these patients may lie within the range of ≥140 mmHg for SBP. In the absence of observational studies with repeated blood pressure measurements or definitive trials evaluating optimal blood pressure targets, individualized blood pressure targets based on patients' unique circumstances are warranted in HF management.

Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventional Evidence

BACKGROUND

Traditional diabetes self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) involves inconvenient finger pricks. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) systems offer CGM, enhancing type 2 diabetes (T2D) management with convenient, comprehensive data.

PURPOSE

To assess the benefits and potential harms of CGM and isCGM compared with usual care or SMBG in individuals with T2D.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and bibliographies up to August 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

We analyzed studies meeting these criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCT) with comparison of at least two interventions for ≥8 weeks in T2D patients, including CGM in real-time/retrospective mode, short-/long-term CGM, isCGM, and SMBG, reporting glycemic and relevant data.

DATA EXTRACTION

We used a standardized data collection form, extracting details including author, year, study design, baseline characteristics, intervention, and outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 26 RCTs (17 CGM and 9 isCGM) involving 2,783 patients with T2D (CGM 632 vs. usual care/SMBG 514 and isCGM 871 vs. usual care/SMBG 766). CGM reduced HbA1c (mean difference -0.19% [95% CI -0.34, -0.04]) and glycemic medication effect score (-0.67 [-1.20 to -0.13]), reduced user satisfaction (-0.54 [-0.98, -0.11]), and increased the risk of adverse events (relative risk [RR] 1.22 [95% CI 1.01, 1.47]). isCGM reduced HbA1c by -0.31% (-0.46, -0.17), increased user satisfaction (0.44 [0.29, 0.59]), improved CGM metrics, and increased the risk of adverse events (RR 1.30 [0.05, 1.62]). Neither CGM nor isCGM had a significant impact on body composition, blood pressure, or lipid levels.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include small samples, single-study outcomes, population variations, and uncertainty for younger adults. Additionally, inclusion of <10 studies for most end points restricted comprehensive analysis, and technological advancements over time need to be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CGM and isCGM demonstrated a reduction in HbA1c levels in individuals with T2D, and unlike CGM, isCGM use was associated with improved user satisfaction. The impact of these devices on body composition, blood pressure, and lipid levels remains unclear, while both CGM and isCGM use were associated with increased risk of adverse events.

Associations of blood pressure with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in over 2 million older persons with or without diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The impact of blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality outcomes in older people with diabetes mellitus (DM) is not well quantified. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies, we aimed to compare the associations of blood pressure levels with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in older people aged ≥ 65 years with or without DM.

METHODS

Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and search of bibliographies to July 2022. Study-specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

Forty-five unique observational cohort studies (n = 2305,189 participants) assessing the associations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels with adverse cardiovascular outcomes were included. In the general population, the pooled RRs (95% CIs) of SBP ≥ 140 vs < 140 mmHg and per 10 mmHg increase for composite CVD/MACE were 1.26 (0.96-1.64) and 1.15 (1.08-1.23), respectively. The respective estimates were 1.56 (1.04-2.34) and 1.10 (1.04-1.18) for patients with DM. SBP ≥ 130 vs < 130 mmHg was not associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both populations. SBP < 120 vs ≥ 120 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of all cause-mortality in the general population (n = 10 studies). DBP ≥ 90 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of some adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both populations. Interaction analyses suggested similar risk of outcomes in both populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational evidence suggests SBP and DBP confer similar cardiovascular and mortality risk in older adults in the general population and those with DM. A blood pressure target range of > 130/80 to < 140/90 mmHg may be optimal for patients ≥ 65 years with DM, but specific targets may need to be individualised based on patients' unique circumstances. Furthermore, findings do not support stringent blood pressure control in this population group. Definitive RCTs are needed to support these observational findings.

Ang-(1-7) attenuates podocyte injury induced by high glucose in vitro

Objective

The incidence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) is gradually increasing worldwide. Podocyte injury, such as podocyte apoptosis and loss of the slit diaphragm (SD)-specific markers are early pathogenic features of DN.

Materials and methods

The cultured mouse podocytes were separated into a high glucose-treated (HG, 30mM) group to mimic DN in vitro, a low glucose-treated (LG, 5mM) group as a control and HG+ angiotensin-(1-7)(Ang-(1-7)) and HG+Ang-(1-7) + D-Ala7-Ang-(1-7) (A779, Ang-(1-7)/Mas receptor antagonist) experimental groups. The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) method and flow cytometry was used to detect podocyte activity and podocyte apoptosis respectively. The expression of angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), Mas receptor (MasR) and podocyte-specific markers were examined by q-PCR and Western blot, respectively.

Results

The results showed that the decrease in podocyte activity; the increase in podocyte apoptosis; the decreased mRNA and protein expression of nephrin, podocin, WT-1 and MasR; and the upregulated expression of AT1R induced by HG could be reversed by Ang-(1-7). However, these effects were blocked by A779. The possible mechanisms of the Ang-(1-7)-mediated effect depended on MasR. In addition, the protective effect of Ang-(1-7) on podocyte activity was dose-dependent and most obvious at 10 µM. A779 had the greatest antagonistic action against Ang-(1-7) at a concentration of 10 μM.

Conclusion

This study reveals that binding of Ang-(1-7) to its specific receptor MasR may counteract the effects of Ang II mediated by AT1R to significantly attenuate podocyte injury induced by high glucose. Ang-(1-7)/MasR targeting in podocytes may be a therapeutic approach to attenuate renal injury in DN.

Integrated analysis for treatment scheme of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a real-world study

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with impaired renal function, but the actual situation of SGLT2i using is unclear. Therefore, in this real-world study, we analyzed the treatment scheme and clinical characteristics of SGLT2i in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We included DKD patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2017 to March 2020. The Apriori algorithm of association rules was used to analysis treatment scheme prescribing SGLT2i and other different combinations of hypoglycemic drugs. SGLT2i was used in 781 (12.3%) of 6336 DKD patients, both number and proportion of patients using SGLT2i increased from 2017 to 2020 (1.9% to 33%). Nighty-eight percent of all DKD patients using SGLT2i were combined with other glucose-lowering agents, and insulin, metformin and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are most commonly used in combination with hypoglycemic drugs. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with non-SGLT2i group, patients using SGLT2i were associated with younger age, higher BMI, higher HbA1c, preserved kidney function, dyslipidemia and combined with ACEI/ARB and statins. In this real-world study, use of SGLT2i in DKD patients is still low. Most patients performed younger age and in the early stages of chronic kidney disease with poor glycemic control. Clinical inertia should be overcome to fully exert the cardiorenal protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, with attention to rational drug use.

Intensive versus standard blood pressure control in older persons with or without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the benefits and harms of intensive versus standard blood pressure (BP) control in older people with or without diabetes mellitus (DM).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Randomised controlled trials comparing intensive versus standard BP control, identified from MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, Web of Science and a search of bibliographies from inception till August 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Older people (≥65 years) with or without DM.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Study-specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for adverse vascular and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

We included six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 20,985 patients (intensive BP = 10,474 and standard BP = 10,511) with a weighted mean follow-up of 3.1 years. In the general population, the RRs (95% CIs) of intensive versus standard BP control for composite cardiovascular events or major adverse cardiovascular events (CVD/MACE), CVD mortality, coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure were 0.71 (0.62-0.82), 0.65 (0.49-0.86), 0.75 (0.60-0.95), 0.75 (0.61-0.92) and 0.58 (0.41-0.82), respectively. Intensive BP control did not increase the risk of renal failure or serious adverse events in the general population. Two RCTs reported results for composite CVD/MACE in patients with DM with a pooled estimate of 0.85 (0.67-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggregate trial evidence shows that intensive BP control (<120 to <140 mmHg) reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older hypertensive patients in the general population with no increase in adverse events. Intensive BP control may confer similar benefits for older patients with DM with no evidence for harm, but this is based on limited data.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022349791.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and aldosterone antagonists, in addition to renin-angiotensin system antagonists, on major adverse kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), selective aldosterone antagonists and nonselective aldosterone antagonists, on top of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade, in reducing kidney-specific composite events, cardiovascular outcomes, and other events of special interest in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched for studies published up to January 20, 2022. Randomized clinical trials enrolling participants with T2D and CKD were included, in which SGLT2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal MRAs, selective aldosterone antagonists and nonselective aldosterone antagonists were compared with either each other, or with placebo or no treatment. A network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approach was performed. The primary outcome was a kidney-specific composite event. Secondary outcomes included death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. We also examined blood pressure and safety outcomes of interest, including acute kidney injury, hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, and volume reduction events. All research was conducted according to a protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022307113).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis of 17 trials randomizing 22 981 participants found SGLT2 inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.73) and nonsteroidal MRAs (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88) were associated with significantly lower kidney-specific composite events than the control groups. Nonsteroidal MRAs (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.92) and SGLT2 inhibitors (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.72) were associated with greater reductions in hospitalization for heart failure than the control groups. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure events compared with nonsteroidal MRAs (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.93) compared with the control groups. When compared to the control groups, both nonsteroidal MRAs (weighted mean difference [WMD] -10.96, 95% CI -20.49 to -1.46) and SGLT2 inhibitors (WMD -3.50, 95% CI -6.01 to -1.013) were linked with lower systolic blood pressure, nonsteroidal MRAs (OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.56) and nonselective aldosterone antagonists (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.43 to 7.66) were associated with an increased risk of hyperkalaemia, nonsteroidal MRAs were linked with an increased risk of hyponatraemia (OR 16.56, 95% CI 2.78 to 455.19), and SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of volume reduction events (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.56). SGLT2 inhibitors were ranked the best for our primary and secondary outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was often high or moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

In this network meta-analysis, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors or nonsteroidal MRAs, combined with RAAS blockade, was associated with a reduction in kidney-specific composite events and hospitalization for heart failure events in patients with T2D and CKD compared to placebo or no treatment. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure events compared with nonsteroidal MRAs. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower mortality than placebo or no treatment.

Defining the Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Primary Care: Time to Think Differently

Disease burden in people with diabetes is mainly driven by long-term complications such as cardiovascular disease, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. This is a consequence of the interconnection between the cardiovascular, renal and metabolic systems, through a continuous chain of events referred to as 'the cardiorenal metabolic continuum'. Increasing evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have beneficial effects across all stages of the cardiorenal metabolic continuum, reducing morbidity and mortality in a wide range of individuals, from those with diabetes and multiple risk factors to those with established heart failure and chronic kidney disease, regardless of the presence of diabetes. Despite this robust evidence base, the complexity of label indications and misconceptions concerning potential side effects have resulted in a lack of clear understanding in primary care regarding the implementation of SGLT2is in clinical practice. With this in mind, we provide an overview of the clinical and economic benefits of SGLT2is across the cardiorenal metabolic continuum together with practical considerations in order to help address some of these concerns and clearly define the role of SGLT2is in primary care as a holistic outcomes-driven treatment with the potential to reduce disease burden across the cardiorenal metabolic spectrum.