Guideline-directed medical therapy in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: An analysis from the HELP-HF registry

Stellate Ganglia: A Key Therapeutic Target for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia in Heart Disease

Malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, are the cause of approximately half a million deaths per year in the United States, which is a common lethal event in heart disease, such as hypertension, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, long-QT syndrome, and progressing into advanced heart failure. A common characteristic of these heart diseases, and the subsequent development of VAs, is the overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system. Current treatments for VAs in these heart diseases, such as β-adrenergic receptor blockers and cardiac sympathetic ablation, aim at inhibiting cardiac sympathetic overactivation. However, these treatments do not translate into becoming efficacious as long-term suppressors of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation events. As a key regulatory component in the heart, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons residing in the stellate ganglia (SGs) release neurotransmitters (such as norepinephrine and NPY [neuropeptide Y]) to perform their regulatory role in dictating cardiac function. Growing evidence from animal experiments and clinical studies has demonstrated that the remodeling of the SG may be intimately involved in malignant arrhythmogenesis. This identifies the SG as a key potential therapeutic target for the treatment of malignant VAs in heart disease. Therefore, this review summarizes the role of SG in ventricular arrhythmogenesis and updates the novel targeting of SG for clinical treatment of VAs in heart disease.

Cardiac rhythm devices in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - role, timing, and optimal use in contemporary practice. European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document

Guidelines for management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) emphasize personalized care, patient engagement, and shared decision-making. Medications and cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices are recommended with a high level of evidence. However, there are significant disparities: patients who could benefit from devices are frequently referred too late or not at all. Misconceptions about device therapy and the notion that the needs of patients (especially the prevention of sudden cardiac death) can now be met by expanding drug therapies may play a role in these disparities. This state-of-the-art review is produced by members of the DIRECT HF initiative, a patient-centred, expert-led educational programme that aims to advance guideline-directed use of CRM devices in patients with HFrEF. This review discusses the latest evidence on the role of CRM devices in reducing HFrEF mortality and morbidity, and provides practical guidance on patient referral, device selection, implant timing and patient-centred follow-up.

Acute Hemodynamic Changes Induced by Cardiac Contractility Modulation Evaluated Using the NICaS® System: A Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction remains a significant global health challenge despite advances in medical therapy. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a promising treatment for symptomatic HF patients who are ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-invasive methods to assess the acute hemodynamic effects of CCM are critical to optimize care and guide treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the acute impact of CCM on stroke volume (SV) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) using the non-invasive bioimpedance-based system (NICaS®). Methods: Eight HF patients (median age: 64.6 years, median left ejection fraction (LVEF): 34.5%) underwent implantation of the Optimizer Smart Mini CCM device. Hemodynamic parameters, including SV and TPRI, were measured using NICaS® at baseline (pre-implantation) and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-implantation. Measurements were repeated eight times per session and analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests, including the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results: Median SV increased significantly from 40.02 mL (interquartile range (IQR): 32.62-78.16 mL) at baseline to 69.83 mL (IQR: 58.63-86.36 mL) at 3 months (p < 0.0001). Median TPRI decreased significantly from 2537 dn s/cm5 m2 (IQR: 1807-3084 dn s/cm5 m2) to 1307 dn s/cm5 m2 (IQR: 1119-1665 dn s/cm5 m2) over the same period (p < 0.0001). CCM therapy significantly improved SV and reduced TPRI in HF patients within three months of implantation. Conclusions: NICaS® provided a reliable, non-invasive tool for monitoring these acute hemodynamic changes, supporting its use in clinical practice.

Atrial fibrillation development in the heart failure population from nationwide British linked electronic health records

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity in heart failure (HF). We analysed factors associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure using linked real-world UK data from primary and secondary care, along with findings from genome-wide association studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 163 174 participants with a diagnosis of HF (January 1998 to May 2016) from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES), 111 595 participants had no previous history of AF (mean age 76.3 ± 12.6; 50.3% women; 95.8% white ethnicity). Multivariate weighted Cox regression was used to identify predictors for new-onset AF. Linkage disequilibrium score regression was performed to assess the strength of the genetic correlation between AF and identified predictors. During follow-up (median 1.33 years, IQR 0.15-4.18), the incidence rate for AF was 2.8% at 30 days, 9.9% at 1 year, 18.0% at 3 years, and 24.9% at 5 years after HF diagnosis after HF diagnosis. Female sex (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88), age (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.04), white ethnicity (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.59), social deprivation (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42), BMI (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02), gentle physical activity (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97), hypertension (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29), chronic kidney disease (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.19) and valvular heart disease (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.29) were associated with new-onset AF. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were associated with lower AF incidence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96), and the magnitude of effect was dependent on the duration of administration. Linkage disequilibrium score regression showed important genetic correlation between AF and HF (rg = 0.57, P = 2.30 × 10-59) and reduced, but still significant, overlap between AF and BMI (rg = 0.19, P = 6.18 × 10-20), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, smoking, and COPD (P values ranging from <10-4 to <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Incident AF in the HF population is high, with good genetic correlation for the two conditions. Identified predictors for new-onset AF might be helpful to improve management of HF patients and AF prevention.

Mechanisms and Prognosis of Intolerance to Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors in Advanced Heart Failure: Insights From Vasodilator Challenge

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) intolerance is common in patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF) and may be associated with worse prognosis. During right heart catheterization (RHC), afterload reduction induced by vasodilator challenge may reproduce the hemodynamic effects of ARNI. Through sodium nitroprusside (NTP) infusion, we characterized the hemodynamic mechanisms of ARNI intolerance and explored its prognostic relevance in AdHF.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study evaluating AdHF patients undergoing RHC with NTP infusion. Hemodynamic ARNI intolerance was defined as symptomatic hypotension requiring ARNI cessation. We collected clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters at baseline and after vasodilator challenge and evaluated their association with ARNI intolerance and a composite clinical outcome of 1-year all-cause death, urgent heart transplantation, or LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

Of the 116 consecutive patients, hemodynamic ARNI intolerance was seen in 26 (22.4%). Baseline hemodynamics were not associated with ARNI intolerance. After NTP infusion, a smaller increase in stroke volume index (ΔSVi; adjusted odds ratio [adj-OR] per mL increase: 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.99, P = 0.031) and higher pulmonary elastance (post-NTP arterial elastance; adj-OR per mm Hg per mL increase: 6.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-40.46, P = 0.045) were independently associated with hemodynamic ARNI intolerance. Patients with ARNI intolerance were more likely to experience the primary outcome (Kaplan-Meier estimates: 73.0% vs 36.2%, P = 0.021). Higher baseline right atrial pressure/pulmonary artery wedge pressure (hazard ratio [HR] 8.57, 95% CI 2.23-32.89, P = 0.002) and lower post-NTP SVi (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, P = 0.015) were independent predictors of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Among AdHF patients, ARNI intolerance is common and associated with worse outcomes. NTP infusion unveils exhausted hemodynamic reserve as its underlying mechanism and prognostic determinant.

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

[Preliminary evaluation of the interest of a therapeutic optimization cell on the titration of treatments for heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and the quality of life of patients]

INTRODUCTION

A multidisciplinary therapeutic optimization unit (COT) was created in January 2023 at Versailles Hospital, aimed at therapeutic optimisation of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The objective of the study was to assess the impact of the first year of COT activity on the sequential implementation and titration of heart failure treatments, the clinical evolution, and improvement of patients' quality of life.

METHODS

This prospective study included consecutive patients treated by the COT after hospitalisation for acute heart failure, from January to December 2023. Clinical, biological, titration, and tolerance data were analysed. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and at the end of the follow-up by COT, using standardized SF-12 and EQ-5D questionnaires.

RESULTS

We included 90 patients (men 73%, mean age 67 years). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34 ± 10 %. At final visit (median number of visits 4 ; median follow-up duration 156 days), 76.7% of patients achieved optimisation with respect to maximum individually tolerated doses, but only 13.3% with respect to theoretical maximum doses for the four therapeutic classes. At 1-year follow up, total mortality was 4.4% (4/90), and 9 patients (10%) were rehospitalised unplanned for acute heart failure. COT monitoring was associated with significant improvement in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L quality of life scores.

CONCLUSION

Although titration of heart failure treatments remained suboptimal, significant improvement was observed for NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and patient quality of life parameters.

The Efficacy and Safety of Levosimendan in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Intermittent ambulatory levosimendan administration has been shown in several small randomized controlled trials to benefit patients with advanced heart failure, preventing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. We aim to investigate the totality of high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent levosimendan in advanced heart failure patients.

METHODS

Up to September 2023, we systematically reviewed the randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We used mean difference (MD) to estimate the continuous outcomes, and risk ratio (RR) for the dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using the random-effects model. Ultimately, a trial sequential analysis was employed to enhance the reliability of our findings and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for certainty leveling.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials with 1181 patients were included. Intermittent levosimendan was significantly associated with an improved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with  placebo (MD 6.39 [95% CI 3.04-9.73], P = 0.002; I2 = 75, P = 0.0005), with cumulative z-score of change after ≤ 1 week passing the monitoring boundaries, favoring the levosimendan, but did not cross the required information size. Additionally, levosimendan reduced the all-cause mortality rate (RR 0.60 [95% CI 0.40-0.90], P = 0.01; I2 = 9, P = 0.36). However, we found no difference between levosimendan and placebo in all-cause rehospitalization rate (RR 0.75 [95% CI 0.46-1.22], P = 0.25; I2 = 70, P = 0.04), event-free survival rate (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.72-1.30], P = 0.84; I2 = 63, P = 0.03), or any adverse event (RR 1 [95% CI 0.73-1.37], P = 1.00, I2 = 0%, P = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced heart failure, intermittent levosimendan significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide values, and all-cause mortality rate. Levosimendan use is not associated with a change in rehospitalization or event-free survival.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identifier number (CRD42023487838).

High-intensity care for GDMT titration

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.

Use of medical therapy and risk of clinical events according to frailty in heart failure patients - A real-life cohort study

AIMS

Although recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the advantages of heart failure (HF) therapy in both frail and not frail patients, there is insufficient information on the use of HF therapy based on frailty status in a real-world setting. The aim was to examine how frailty status in HF patients associates with use of HF therapy and with clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with new-onset HF between 2014 and 2021 were identified using the nationwide Danish registers. Patients across the entire range of ejection fraction were included. The associations between frailty status (using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score) and use of HF therapy and clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and non-HF hospitalization) were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox models adjusting for age, sex, diagnostic setting, calendar year, comorbidities, pharmacotherapy, and socioeconomic status. Of 35 999 participants (mean age 69.1 years), 68% were not frail, 26% were moderately frail, and 6% were severely frail. The use of HF therapy was significantly lower in frailer patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker initiation was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.77) and 0.48 (0.43-0.53) for moderate frailty and severe frailty, respectively. For beta-blockers, the corresponding HRs were 0.74 (0.71-0.78) and 0.51 (0.46-0.56), respectively, and for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 0.83 (0.80-0.87) and 0.58 (0.53-0.64), respectively. The prevalence of death and non-HF hospitalization increased with frailty status. The HR for death was 1.55 (1.47-1.63) and 2.32 (2.16-2.49) for moderate and severe frailty, respectively, and the HR for non-HF hospitalization was 1.37 (1.32-1.41) and 1.82 (1.72-1.92), respectively. The association between frailty status and HF hospitalization was not significant (HR 1.08 [1.02-1.14] and 1.08 [0.97-1.20], respectively).

CONCLUSION

In real-world HF patients, frailty was associated with lower HF therapy use and with a higher incidence of clinical outcomes including mortality and non-HF hospitalization.

Impact of malnutrition in patients with severe heart failure

AIM

The role of malnutrition among patients with severe heart failure (HF) is not well established. We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of malnutrition in patients with severe HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nutritional status was measured using the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), based on body weight, height and serum albumin concentration, with malnutrition defined as GNRI ≤98. It was assessed in consecutive patients with severe HF, defined by at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker, enrolled at four Italian centres between January 2020 and November 2021. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 510 patients with data regarding nutritional status were included in the study (mean age 74 ± 12 years, 66.5% male). Among them, 179 (35.1%) had GNRI ≤98 (malnutrition). At multivariable logistic regression, lower body mass index (BMI) and higher levels of natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] > median value [685 pg/ml] or N-terminal proBNP > median value [5775 pg/ml]) were independently associated with a higher likelihood of malnutrition. Estimated rates of all-cause death at 1 year were 22.4% and 41.1% in patients without and with malnutrition, respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). The impact of malnutrition on all-cause mortality was confirmed after multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.43-2.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a contemporary, real-world, multicentre cohort of patients with severe HF, malnutrition (defined as GNRI ≤98) was common and independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. Lower BMI and higher natriuretic peptides were identified as predictors of malnutrition in these patients.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors Use in Elderly Polypathological Patients with Acute Heart Failure: PROFUND-IC Registry

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent clinical syndrome with serious morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, acute heart failure (AHF) is the main cause of hospital admission in people aged 65 years or more. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have been shown to improve the survival and quality of life in patients with HF regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Our aims were to describe the characteristics of adults with multiple pathologies admitted with acute heart failure as the main diagnosis and of the population treated with SGLT2is, as well as to evaluate if their use was associated with lower readmission and mortality rates. Methods: A prospective study of patients from the PROFUND-IC registry who were admitted with AHF as the main diagnosis was conducted. Clinical and analytical characteristics were analyzed, as well as readmissions and mortality. Descriptive and bivariate analyses of the sample between those taking SGLT2is and those who were not were performed, using the chi-square test for qualitative variables and Welch's test for quantitative measures, as well as the Fisher and Wilcoxon tests as indicated for nonparametric tests. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to analyze the readmission and mortality of patients at 12 months based on SGLT2i treatment. Finally, a propensity score matching was performed, guaranteeing that the observed effect of the drug was not influenced by the differences in the characteristics between the groups. Results: There were 750 patients included: 58% were women, and the mean age was 84 years. Functional class II according to the NYHA scale predominated (54%), and the mean LVEF was 51%. SGLT2 inhibitors were prescribed to only 28% of patients. Most of the patients were men (48.6% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.029), they were younger (82 vs. 84 years, p = 0.002), and their LVEF was lower (48% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Lower mortality was observed in the group treated with SGLT2is, both during baseline admission (2.4% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.017) and at the 12-month follow-up (6.2% vs. 13%, p = 0.023); as well as a lower readmission rate (23.8% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001). After the propensity score matching, a decrease in the 12-month readmission rate continued to be observed in the group treated with SGLT2is (p = 0.03). Conclusions: SGLT2is use was associated with lower readmission rates at the 12-month follow-up in older adults with multiple pathologies admitted with acute heart failure.

Frailty according to the 2019 HFA-ESC definition in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: Insights from the HELP-HF registry

AIMS

Frailty is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but a concordant definition of this condition is lacking. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) proposed in 2019 a new multi-domain definition of frailty, but it has never been validated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients from the HELP-HF registry were stratified according to the number of HFA-ESC frailty domains fulfilled and to the cumulative deficits frailty index (FI) quintiles. Prevalence of frailty and of each domain was reported, as well as the rate of the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization, its single components, and cardiovascular death in each group and quintile. Among 854 included patients, 37 (4.3%), 206 (24.1%), 365 (42.8%), 217 (25.4%), and 29 (3.4%) patients fulfilled zero, one, two, three, or four domains, respectively, while 179 patients had a FI < 0.21 and were considered not frail. The 1-year risk of adverse events increased proportionally to the number of domains fulfilled (for each criterion increase, all-cause death or HF hospitalization: hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.62; all-cause death: HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.02, HF hospitalizations: subHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.31; cardiovascular death: HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.45-2.15). Consistent results were found stratifying the cohort for FI quintiles. The FI as a continuous variable demonstrated higher discriminative ability than the number of domains fulfilled (area under the curve = 0.68 vs. 0.64, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Frailty in patients at risk for advanced HF, assessed via a multi-domain approach and the FI, is highly prevalent and identifies those at increased risk of adverse events. The FI was found to be slightly more effective in identifying patients at increased risk of mortality.

How to tackle therapeutic inertia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces morbidity and mortality, but its implementation is often poor in daily clinical practice. Barriers to implementation include clinical and organizational factors that might contribute to clinical inertia, i.e. avoidance/delay of recommended treatment initiation/optimization. The spectrum of strategies that might be applied to foster GDMT implementation is wide, and involves the organizational set-up of heart failure care pathways, tailored drug initiation/optimization strategies increasing the chance of successful implementation, digital tools/telehealth interventions, educational activities and strategies targeting patient/physician awareness, and use of quality registries. This scientific statement by the Heart Failure Association of the ESC provides an overview of the current state of GDMT implementation in HFrEF, clinical and organizational barriers to implementation, and aims at suggesting a comprehensive framework on how to overcome clinical inertia and ultimately improve implementation of GDMT in HFrEF based on up-to-date evidence.

Validation of a New Scoring Method to Assess the Efficacy of Rapid Initiation and Titration of Combination Pharmacotherapy for Patients Hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Despite the encouragement of early initiation and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for the treatment of heart failure (HF), most patients do not receive an adequate type and dose of pharmacotherapy in the real world. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of titrating composite GDMT in patients with HF with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction and to identify patient conditions that may benefit from titration of GDMT. Methods: This was a two-center, retrospective study of consecutive patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Patients were classified into two groups according to a scoring scale determined by combination and doses of four types of HF agents (ACEis/ARBs/ARNis, BBs, MRAs, and SGLT2is) at discharge. A score of 5 or greater was defined as titrated GDMT, and a score of 4 or less was regarded as sub-optimal medical therapy (MT). Results: A total of 979 ADHF patients were screened. After 553 patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria, 426 patients (90 patients in the titrated GDMT group and 336 patients in the sub-optimal MT group) were enrolled for the analysis. The median follow-up period was 612 (453-798) days. Following statistical adjustment using the propensity score weighting method, the 2-year composite endpoint (composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization) rate was significantly lower in the titrated GDMT group, at 19%, compared with the sub-optimal MT group: 31% (score 3-4 points) and 43% (score 0-2 points). Subgroup analysis indicated a marked benefit of titrated GDMT in particular patient subgroups: age < 80 years, BMI 19.0-24.9, eGFR > 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, and serum potassium level ≤ 5.5 mmol/L. Conclusions: Prompt initiation and dose adjustment of multiple HF medications, with careful monitoring of the patient's physiologic and laboratory values, is a prerequisite for improving the prognosis of patients with heart failure.

The role of multimorbidity in patients with heart failure across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

AIMS

The aim of this analysis was to provide data on the overall comorbidity burden, both cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV, in a large real-world heart failure (HF) population across the ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF from the Swedish HF Registry between 2000 and 2021 were included. Of 91 463 patients (median age 76 years [interquartile range 67-82]), 98% had at least one among the 17 explored comorbidities (94% at least one CV and 85% at least one non-CV comorbidity). All comorbidities, except for coronary artery disease (CAD), were more frequent in HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Patients with multiple comorbidities were older, more likely female, inpatients, with HFpEF, worse New York Heart Association class and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. In a multivariable Cox model, 12 comorbidities were independently associated with a higher risk of death from any cause. The highest risk was associated with dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-1.65), chronic kidney disease (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.34-1.41), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.28-1.35). Obesity was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.84). CAD and valvular heart disease were associated with a higher risk of all-cause and CV mortality, but not non-CV mortality, whereas cancer and musculo-skeletal disease increased the risk of non-CV mortality. A significant interaction with EF was observed for several comorbidities. Occurrence of CV and non-CV outcomes was related to the number of CV and non-CV comorbidities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The burden of both CV and non-CV comorbidities was high in HF regardless of EF, but overall higher in HFpEF. Multimorbidity was associated with a high risk of death with a different burden on CV or non-CV outcomes.