Predictors and prognostic significance of tachycardiomyopathy: insights from a cohort of 1269 patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation

Clinical Characterization of Arrhythmia-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Tachyarrhythmia and Idiopathic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is a known entity, but prospective evidence for its characterization is limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to: 1) determine the relative frequency of the pure form of AIC in the clinically relevant cohort of patients with newly diagnosed, otherwise unexplained left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and tachyarrhythmia; 2) assess the time to recovery from LVSD; and 3) identify parameters for an early diagnosis of AIC.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively included, underwent effective rhythm restoration, and were followed-up at 2, 4, and 6 months to evaluate clinical characteristics, biomarkers, and cardiac imaging including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with recurred arrhythmia were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

41 of 50 patients were diagnosed with AIC 6 months after rhythm restoration. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increased 2 months after rhythm restoration from 35.4% ± 8.2% to 52.7% ± 8.0% in AIC patients vs 37.0% ± 9.5% to 43.3% ± 7.0% in non-AIC patients. From month 2 to 6, LV ejection fraction continued to increase in AIC patients (57.2% ± 6.1%; P < 0.001) but remained stable in non-AIC patients (44.0% ± 7.8%; P = 0.628). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that lower LV end-diastolic diameter at baseline could be used for early diagnosis of AIC, whereas biomarkers and other morphological or functional parameters, including late LV gadolinium enhancement, did not show suitability for early diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a high prevalence of AIC in patients with otherwise unexplained LVSD and concomitant tachyarrhythmia, suggesting that this condition may be underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Most patients recovered fast, within months, from LVSD. A low initial LV end-diastolic diameter may constitute an early marker for diagnosis of AIC.

Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation-Related Cardiomyopathies: Potential Mechanisms and Current Therapies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of new-onset ventricular contractile dysfunction, termed arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). Although cardioembolic stroke remains the most feared and widely studied complication of AF, AIC is also a clinically important consequence of AF that portends significant morbidity and mortality to patients with AF. Current treatments are aimed at restoring sinus rhythm through catheter ablation and rate and rhythm control, but these treatments do not target the underlying molecular mechanisms driving the progression from AF to AIC. Here, we describe the clinical features of the various AIC subtypes, discuss the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving the progression from AF to AIC, and review the evidence surrounding current treatment options. In this review, we aim to identify key knowledge gaps that will enable the development of more effective AIC therapies that target cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Predictors of improvement in left ventricular systolic function after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure

AIMS

The current management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure (HF) remains a significant challenge. Catheter ablation (CA) has been shown to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in these patients, but which patients can benefit from CA is still poorly understood. The aim of our study was to determine the predictors of improved ejection fraction in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) complicated with HF undergoing CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 435 patients with persistent AF underwent an initial CA between January 2019 and March 2023 in our hospital. We investigated consecutive patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within one month before CA. According to the LVEF changes at 6 months, these patients were divided into an improved group (fulfilling the '2021 Universal Definition of HF' criteria for LVEF recovery) and a nonimproved group. Eighty patients were analyzed, and the improvement group consisted of 60 patients (75.0%). In the univariate analysis, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.005) and low voltage zones in the left atrium (P = 0.043) were associated with improvement of LVEF. A receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that the suitable cutoff value for left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) was 59 mm (sensitivity: 85.0%, specificity: 55.0%, area under curve: 0.709). A multivariate analysis showed that LVDd (OR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P = 0.005) and low voltage zones (LVZs) (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.96, P = 0.043) were significantly independently associated with the improvement of LVEF. Additionally, parameters were significantly improved regarding the left atrial diameter, LVDd and ventricular rate after radiofrequency catheter ablation (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) occurred in 75.0% of patients. Our study provides additional evidence that LVDd < 59 mm and no low voltage zones in the left atrium can be used to jointly predict the improvement of LVEF after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Severity of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy: Impacts on Remodeling After Atrial Flutter Ablation

Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy is defined as a reversible left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (SeD) resulting from a sustained fast heart rate. LV remodeling in patients with severe LV dysfunction at diagnosis remains poorly understood. In this retrospective cohort study, we described LV remodeling in 50 patients who underwent atrial flutter ablation. These patients were divided into severe LV SeD (LV ejection fraction [EF] ≤30%) and LV nonsevere SeD (LVEF 31% to 50%) at baseline. All continuous variables are expressed as median and interquartile range. LVEF was 18% (13 to 25) and 38% (34 to 41) in the SeD (n = 29) and LV nonsevere SeD (n = 21) groups, respectively. At baseline, patients with SeD had higher LV end-diastolic diameter (56 [54 to 59] vs 49 mm [47 to 52], p <0.01), LV end-systolic diameter (48 [43 to 51] vs 36 mm [34 to 41], p <0.01), LV end-diastolic volume (71 [64 to 85] vs 56 ml/m2 [46 to 68], p <0.01), LV end-systolic volume (56 [53 to 70] vs 36 ml/m2 [27 to 42], p <0.01), and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (12 [10 to 13] vs 16 mm [13 to 19], p <0.01). At last follow-up, LVEF was not statistically significantly different between groups. However, LV end-systolic diameter (36 [34 to 39] vs 32 mm [32 to 34], p = 0.01) and LV end-systolic volume (29 [26 to 35] vs 25 ml/m2 [20 to 29], p = 0.02) remained larger in the SeD group. Seven patients (14%), all from the SeD group, had a LVEF ≤35% 2 months after rhythm control, and reverse remodeling was observed up to 9 months. In conclusion, more than half of patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy and atrial flutter had LVEF ≤30% at baseline. LVEF recovery and LV remodeling were observed beyond 2 months, highlighting the importance of rhythm control and early guideline-directed medical therapy in these patients.

Thrombus entrapment with left atrial appendage closure to facilitate early cardioversion in tachycardiomyopathy: a case report

Background

The aetiological spectrum of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is various. Tachycardiomyopathy is recognized as one of the cause, usually made retrospectively. In this clinical context, rhythm control with restoration of sinus rhythm is considered crucial to minimize ventricular function damage and allow contractility recovery. However, the presence of a thrombus in the left atrial appendage is a limiting factor, typically requiring anticoagulation until the thrombus resolves, at least 3 weeks, thus delaying the therapy.

Case summary

We present a case of 65-year-old man with diagnosis of new-onset acute symptomatic heart failure with severe reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction 15%), in the context of a typical tachycardic atrial flutter and concomitant thrombus in the left atrial appendage confirmed by transoesophageal echocardiography. We successfully performed a thrombus entrapment procedure by means of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure, which allowed immediate restoration of sinus rhythm through cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. After the institution of the heart failure therapy, titrated up to the maximum tolerated dose, we observed a complete restoration of left ventricular function after 6 months.

Discussion

Thrombus entrapment by means of left atrial appendage closure is a valid strategy that enables early cardioversion with arrhythmia ablation and rapid restoration of normal cardiac rhythm in severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, even in acute situations and typical atrial flutter.

How arrhythmias weaken the ventricle: an often underestimated vicious cycle

Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is classified as a form of dilated cardiomyopathy in which left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is triggered by tachycardic or arrhythmic heart rates. On the one hand AIC can develop in patients without cardiac disease and on the other hand it can appear in patients with pre-existing LVSD, leading to a further reduction in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. A special aspect of AIC is the potential termination or partial reversibility of LVSD; thus, AIC is curatively treatable by the elimination of the underlying arrhythmia. Since arrhythmias are often seen merely as a consequence than as an underlying cause of LVSD, and due to the fact that the diagnosis of AIC can be made only after recovery of LV function, the prevalence of AIC is probably underestimated in clinical practice. Pathophysiologically, animal models have shown that continuous tachycardic pacing induces consecutive changes such as the occurrence of LVSD, increased filling pressures, LV dilatation, and decreased cardiac output. After termination of tachycardia, reversibility of the described pathologies can usually be observed. Studies in human ventricular myocardium have recently demonstrated that various cellular structural and functional mechanisms are activated even by normofrequent atrial fibrillation, which may help to explain the clinical AIC phenotype.

Rate of atrial fibrillation and flutter induced tachycardiomyopathy in a cohort of hospitalized patients with heart failure and detection of indicators for improved diagnosis

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) induced tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) has been known to cause reversible heart failure (HF) for many years. However, the prevalence of the disease is unknown, and diagnosis is challenging. Therefore, the aim of the present study was (1) to assess the rate of AF/AFL induced TCM and (2) to identify indicators for diagnosis.

Methods

Consecutively, all patients with a diagnosis of HF who were hospitalized in our department within 12 months were reviewed. For the main analysis, all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and AF or AFL were included. AF/AFL induced TCM was diagnosed when there was at least a 10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction under rhythm or rate control within 3 months. Patients with HFrEF with AF/AFL but without TCM served as control group.

Results

A total of 480 patients were included. AF/AFL induced TCM occurred in 26 patients (5.4%) and HFrEF with AF/AFL in 53 patients (11%). Independent indicators of AF/AFL induced TCM were age<79 years [Odds ratio 5.887, confidence interval (CI) 1.999-17.339, p < 0.001], NT-pro-BNP <5,419 pg/mL (Odds ratio 2.327, CI 1.141-4.746, p = 0.004), and a resting heart rate >112 bpm (Odds ratio 2.503, CI 1.288-4.864, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Approximately 5% of all patients hospitalized for HF suffer from AF/AFL induced TCM. Improved discrimination of AF/AFL induced TCM to HFrEF with AF/AFL is possible considering age, NT-pro-BNP level, and resting heart rate >112 beats/minute. Based on these parameters, an earlier diagnosis and improved therapy might be possible.

Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter and heart failure in the elderly-results of a retrospective multi-center study

Introduction

While in the CASTLE-AF trial, in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, interventional therapy using pulmonary vein isolation was associated with outcome improvement, data on cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) in atrial flutter (AFL) in the elderly is rare.

Methods

We included 96 patients between 60 and 85 years with typical AFL and heart failure with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) treated in two medical centers. 48 patients underwent an electrophysiological study with CTIA, whereas 48 patients received rate or rhythm control and guideline-compliant heart failure therapy. Patients were followed up for 2 years, with emphasis on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiac causes.

Results

Patients with CTIA showed a significant increase in LVEF after 1 (p < 0.001) and 2 years (p < 0.001) in contrast to baseline LVEF. Improvement of LVEF in the CTIA group was associated with significantly lower 2-year mortality (p = 0.003). In the multivariate regression analysis, CTIA remained the relevant factor associated with LVEF improvement (HR: 2.845 CI:95% 1.044-7.755; p = 0.041). Elderly patients (≥ 70 years) further benefited from CTIA, since they showed a significantly reduced rehospitalization (p = 0.042) and mortality rate after 2 years (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

CTIA in patients with typical AFL and HFrEF/HFmrEF was associated with significant improvement of LVEF and reduced mortality rates after 2 years. Patient age should not be a primary exclusion criterion for CTIA, since patients ≥70 years also seem to benefit from intervention in terms of mortality and hospitalization.

Treatment response in recent-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: non-ischaemic vs. ischaemic aetiology

AIMS

In heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), the prognosis appears better in non-ischaemic than in ischaemic aetiology. Infrequent diagnostic work-up for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in HF is reported. In this study, we compared short-term response to initiated guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in recent-onset HFrEF of non-ischaemic (non-IHF) vs. ischaemic (IHF) aetiology and evaluated the frequency of coronary investigation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients hospitalized with recent-onset HFrEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%] between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019 were included. Treatment response was determined by use of a hierarchical clinical composite outcome classifying each patient as worsened, improved, or unchanged based on hard outcomes (mortality, heart transplantation, and HF hospitalization) and soft outcomes (± ≥10 unit change in LVEF, ± ≥30% change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and ± ≥1 point change in New York Heart Association functional class) during 28 weeks of follow-up. The associations between baseline characteristics and composite changes were analysed with multiple logistic regression. Among the 364 patients analysed, 47 were not investigated for IHD. Comparing non-IHF (n = 203) vs. IHF (n = 114), patients were younger (mean age 61.0 vs. 69.4 years, P < 0.001) with lower mean LVEF (26% vs. 31%, P < 0.001), but with similar male predominance (70.4% vs. 75.4%, P = 0.363). For non-IHF vs. IHF, the composite outcomes were worsened (19.1% vs. 43.9%, P < 0.001) and improved (74.2% vs. 43.9%, P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustments, IHF was associated with increased odds for worsening [odds ratio (OR) 2.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-5.74; P = 0.002] and decreased odds for improvement (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18-0.65; P < 0.001). In cases without previous IHD or new-onset myocardial infarction (n = 261), a decision for coronary investigation was made in 69.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent-onset HFrEF, patients with non-IHF responded better to GDMT than patients with IHF. Almost one-third of patients selected for follow-up at HF clinics were never investigated for IHD.

Arrhythmia-induced Cardiomyopathy: An Article Review

Arrhythmia is one of the significant reversible causes in patients with heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and premature ventricular contractions have indeed been related to arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (CM), a reversible dilated CM. Effective arrhythmia suppression will entirely or partially recover ventricular function, lowering morbidity and mortality. However, the importance of arrhythmia-induced CM (ARiCM) is often underestimated in clinical practice because arrhythmia is often seen as a result rather than a cause of CM, leading in treatment delays and failure to increase the quality of life and better clinical outcomes. This article review aims to summarize the pathomechanisms, and a general approach to the management of ARiCM and its long-term outcomes. ARiCM can cause a variety of clinical signs, ranging from asymptomatic to severe heart failure symptoms. Electrocardiogram, 24 h Holter monitoring, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance are all recommended for diagnosis. More research is required to better understand the pathogenesis of ARiCM and to differentiate treatment alternatives to choose the ideal ARiCM management approach.

Is it possible to expect left ventricular ejection fraction improvement in patients with known advanced heart diseases in the case of right atrial flutter treated by ablation?

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter (AFL)-related tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TICM) is a treatable cause of heart failure (HF). This study aims to explore the effect of AFL ablation on left ventricular (LV) function in right AFL patients with or without advanced heart diseases.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 149 patients underwent ablation for persistent AFL. Among them, 60 patients with persistent right atrial (RA) flutter had symptomatic HF and elevated natriuretic peptide levels. Group 1 consisted of 35 patients without advanced heart diseases, and group 2 consisted of 25 patients with prior history of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or surgery for valvular heart disease (VHD). Follow-up echocardiography was performed 6 months later. Improvement of LV performance was defined as LV ejection fraction (EF) increase ≥50% of baseline EF without clinical HF symptoms or LVEF recovery to ≥60%.

RESULTS

Group 2 had larger LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volume than group 1. At follow-up, group 2 had larger LV end-systolic volume than group 1. Group 1 had more increase in LVEF than group 2 (21.7 ± 15.2% vs 4.1 ± 13.2%; P < .001). A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to determine the discrimination threshold of baseline LVEDV (137 mL) in the overall study group for improvement of LV performance after ablation (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful ablation for right AFL could achieve more reversal of LV dysfunction in patients without advanced heart diseases. Pre-ablation LVEDV ≥ 137 mL was associated with no improvement of LV performance after ablation.

Heart failure and atrial flutter: a systematic review of current knowledge and practices

While the interplay between heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been extensively studied, little is known regarding HF and atrial flutter (AFL), which may be managed differently. We reviewed the incidence, prevalence, and predictors of HF in AFL and vice versa, and the outcomes of treatment of AFL in HF. A systematic literature review of PubMed/Medline and EMBASE yielded 65 studies for inclusion and qualitative synthesis. No study described the incidence or prevalence of AFL in unselected patients with HF. Most cohorts enrolled patients with AF/AFL as interchangeable diagnoses, or highly selected patients with tachycardia‐induced cardiomyopathy. The prevalence of HF in AFL ranged from 6% to 56%. However, the phenotype of HF was never defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). No studies reported the predictors, phenotype, and prognostic implications of AFL in HF. There was significant variation in treatments studied, including the proportion that underwent ablation. When systolic dysfunction was tachycardia‐mediated, catheter ablation demonstrated LVEF normalization in up to 88%, as well as reduced cardiovascular mortality. In summary, AFL and HF often coexist but are understudied, with no randomized trial data to inform care. Further research is warranted to define the epidemiology and establish optimal management.

Acute heart failure in elderly patients: a review of invasive and non-invasive management

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of unplanned hospitalisations in the elderly and is associated with high mortality. Its prevalence has grown in the last years due to population aging and longer life expectancy of chronic heart failure patients. Although international societies have provided guidelines for the management of AHF in the general population, scientific evidence for geriatric patients is often lacking, as these are underrepresented in clinical trials. Elderly have a different risk profile with more comorbidities, disability, and frailty, leading to increased morbidity, longer recovery time, higher readmission rates, and higher mortality. Furthermore, therapeutic options are often limited, due to unfeasibility of invasive strategies, mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation. Thus, the in-hospital management of AHF should be tailored to each patient's clinical situation, cardiopulmonary condition and geriatric assessment. Palliative care should be considered in some cases, in order to avoid unnecessary diagnostics and/or treatments. After discharge, a strict follow-up through outpatient clinic or telemedicine is can improve quality of life and reduce rehospitalisation rates. The aim of this review is to offer an insight on current literature and provide a clinically oriented, patient-tailored approach regarding assessment, treatment and follow-up of elderly patients admitted for AHF.

A retrospective evaluation of catheter ablation in atrial flutter post cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter is the most common arrhythmia post cardiac transplantation. Observational studies in the non-transplant population have shown prognostic benefit with catheter ablation; however, there are no data in the heart transplant population.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the experience of catheter ablation in atrial flutter post cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of experience of late onset atrial flutter at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, between 1985 and January 2020.

RESULTS

Sixty eight of the 722 patients who survived 6 months post cardiac transplantation developed late atrial flutter giving an incidence of 9.4%. Thirty-two patients were managed with ablation with treatment largely determined by time of flutter onset. Kaplan Meier estimates for arrhythmia free survival post first ablation for organized atrial arrhythmias was 83.3% at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimates for median survival post onset of atrial arrhythmias treated with ablation was 11.34 years (95% CI 8.00-14.57), compared to 5.79 years in patients managed medically (95%CI 2.26-9.32) (P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial flutter is an important late complication of cardiac transplantation. Patients treated with ablation in the modern era had increased survival compared to a historical cohort.

Tachicardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Case report

The tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy is a rare case of reversible heart failure and left ventricle disfunction. The diagnostic approach and treatment strategy are described in this article. Also the clinical case of heart failure compensation in the patient with left ventricle dilatation and atrial flutter after the reverse to sinus rhythm is after catheter ablation presented.

Arrhythmia-Induced Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Heart failure affects 1–2% of the population and is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Cardiac arrhythmias are often a result of heart failure, but they can cause left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as an arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). This causal relationship should be borne in mind by the physician treating a patient with systolic heart failure in association with cardiac arrhythmia.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed (1987–2017) and on the recommendations in current guidelines.

RESULTS

The key criterion for the diagnosis of an AIC is the demonstration of a persistent arrhythmia (including pathological tachycardia) together with an LVSD whose origin cannot be explained on any other basis. Nearly any type of tachyarrhythmia or frequent ventricular extrasystoles can lead, if persistent, to a progressively severe LVSD. The underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood; the increased ventricular rate, asynchronous cardiac contractions, and neurohumoral activation all seem to play a role. The most common precipitating factors are supraventricular tachycardias in children and atrial fibrillation in adults. Recent studies have shown that the causal significance of atrial fibrillation in otherwise unexplained LVSD is underappreciated. The treatment of AIC consists primarily of the treatment of the underlying arrhythmia, generally with drugs such as beta-blockers and amiodarone. Depending on the type of arrhythmia, catheter ablation for long-term treatment should also be considered where appropriate. The diagnosis of AIC is considered to be well established when the LVSD normalizes or improves within a few weeks or months of the start of targeted treatment of the arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

An AIC is potentially reversible. The timely recognition of this condition and the appropriate treatment of the underlying arrhythmia can substantially improve patient outcomes.

In-hospital mortality of patients with atrial arrhythmias: insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network of 161 502 patients and 34 025 arrhythmia-related procedures

Aims

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) and atrial flutter (AFlut) are common arrhythmias with increased use of invasive procedures. A steady re-evaluation of relevant safety endpoints is recommended and both quality management and pay-for-performance programs are evolving. Therefore, the aims of this study were (i) to investigate and report overall in-hospital mortality and mortality of invasive arrhythmia-related procedures and (ii) to identify mortality predictors in a German-wide hospital network.

Methods and results

Administrative data provided by 78 Helios hospitals between 2010 and 2017 were examined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems- and Operations and Procedures-codes to identify patients with AFib or AFlut as main discharge diagnosis or secondary diagnosis combined with invasive arrhythmia-related interventions. In 161 502 patients, in-hospital mortality was 0.6% with a significant decrease from 0.75% to 0.5% (P < 0.01) during the observational period. In multivariable analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-3.05; P < 0.01], high centre volume (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.65; P < 0.01), emergency hospital admission (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.38-1.79; P < 0.01), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, OR 4.95, 95% CI 4.50-5.44; P < 0.01) were found as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Mortality rates were 0.05% for left atrial catheter ablation (CA, n = 21 744), 0.3% for right atrial CA (n = 9972), and 0.56% for implantation of a left atrial appendage occluder (n = 2309), respectively.

Conclusion

We analysed for the first time in-hospital mortality rates of patients with atrial arrhythmias in a German-wide, multi-centre administrative dataset. This allows feasible, comparable, and up-to-date performance measurement of clinically important endpoints in a real-world setting which may contribute to quality management programs and towards value-based healthcare.

The detrimental potential of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy

Here we discuss a case of arrhythmia‐induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) with consecutive severe multiple organ failure. In relation to this imposing case, we discuss the significance of this potentially underestimated cause of newly occurred left‐ventricular systolic dysfunction and concomitant arrhythmia. We further delineate the diagnostic algorithm and differential diagnoses of AIC.

Usefulness of the WCD in patients with suspected tachymyopathy

AIMS

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is used for temporary protection of patients deemed to be at high risk for sudden death. There is limited experience regarding the clinical development of patients with tachymyopathy. We aimed to evaluate the clinical development of tachymyopathy patients protected with a WCD in a single-center non-randomized patient cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We fitted 130 consecutive patients deemed to be at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias with the WCD. Of these, 20 patients (15%) presenting with newly diagnosed heart failure in the setting of rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation/flutter were suspected to suffer from tachymyopathy. The control group consisted of the remaining 110 patients with other indications for WCD therapy. LVEF increased by more than 10% in 13/20 (65%) tachymyopathy patients compared to 40/110 (36%) patients in the control population (p = 0.01). Similarly, BNP levels decreased in 15/20 (75%) tachymyopathy patients compared to 41/110 (37%) in the control group (p = 0.05). ICD implantation rates were lower in the tachymyopathy group (3/20) compared to the control population (40/110; p = 0.04). On further follow-up (mean 12 ± 8 months), patients with suspected tachymyopathy had no sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Compared to 5/110 patients in the control group, no tachymyopathy patient died.

CONCLUSION

Most of the patients with suspected tachymyopathy have a favorable clinical outcome. The WCD is useful for temporary protection while LV function recovers.

Clinical recognition of pure premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy at presentation

BACKGROUND

Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can induce or worsen left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical pattern of patients having a "pure PVC-induced" cardiomyopathy at presentation.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included 155 consecutive patients (age 55 ± 12 years, 96 men [62%], 23% ±12% mean PVC burden) with LV dysfunction and frequent PVCs submitted for ablation and followed up for at least 12 months. Patients with a previously diagnosed structural heart disease (50 [32%]) and those without complete PVC abolition during follow-up who did not normalize LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (24 [15%]) were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the remaining 81 patients, 41 (51%) had a successful sustained ablation, did not have normalized LVEF, and were classified as having PVC-worsened nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 40 (49%) who had normalized LVEF were considered as having pure PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. The latter group had higher baseline PVC burden (27% ± 12% vs 12% ± 8%; P <.001), smaller LV end-diastolic diameter (58 ± 5 mm vs 60 ± 6 mm; P = .05), and shorter intrinsic QRS (105 ± 12 vs 129 ± 24 ms; P <.001). Any of the following baseline characteristics accurately identified patients who will not normalize LVEF after PVC ablation (85% sensitivity, 98% specificity): intrinsic QRS >130 ms, baseline PVC burden <17%, and LV end-diastolic diameter >63 mm.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patients with frequent PVCs and low LVEF of unknown origin normalize LVEF after sustained PVC abolition, and these patients can be identified before ablation.

[Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia causing cardiomyopathy in an adult woman]

A 35-year-old female was referred with progressive dyspnoea and elevated heart rate. Surface electrocardiography (ECG) showed supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with long RP interval and inverse P waves. ECG revealed left ventricular dilation and severe systolic dysfunction. An electrophysiological (EP) examination was performed due to incessant SVT despite betablocker medication. Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) was diagnosed and successfully ablated. During follow-up, the patient's symptoms abated and ECG parameters normalized. PJRT is usually found in infants and children, but should also be considered as a rare cause of incessant SVT and tachycardiomyopathy in adults.