1
|
Maia AT, Antoniou AC, O'Reilly M, Samarajiwa S, Dunning M, Kartsonaki C, Chin SF, Curtis CN, McGuffog L, Domchek SM, Easton DF, Peock S, Frost D, Evans DG, Eeles R, Izatt L, Adlard J, Eccles D, Sinilnikova OM, Mazoyer S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Gauthier-Villars M, Faivre L, Venat-Bouvet L, Delnatte C, Nevanlinna H, Couch FJ, Godwin AK, Caligo MA, Barkardottir RB, Chen X, Beesley J, Healey S, Caldas C, Chenevix-Trench G, Ponder BAJ. Effects of BRCA2 cis-regulation in normal breast and cancer risk amongst BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14:R63. [PMID: 22513257 PMCID: PMC3446398 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2011] [Revised: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cis-acting regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at specific loci may modulate penetrance of germline mutations at the same loci by introducing different levels of expression of the wild-type allele. We have previously reported that BRCA2 shows differential allelic expression and we hypothesize that the known variable penetrance of BRCA2 mutations might be associated with this mechanism. METHODS We combined haplotype analysis and differential allelic expression of BRCA2 in breast tissue to identify expression haplotypes and candidate cis-regulatory variants. These candidate variants underwent selection based on in silico predictions for regulatory potential and disruption of transcription factor binding, and were functionally analyzed in vitro and in vivo in normal and breast cancer cell lines. SNPs tagging the expression haplotypes were correlated with the total expression of several genes in breast tissue measured by Taqman and microarray technologies. The effect of the expression haplotypes on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers was investigated in 2,754 carriers. RESULTS We identified common haplotypes associated with differences in the levels of BRCA2 expression in human breast cells. We characterized three cis-regulatory SNPs located at the promoter and two intronic regulatory elements which affect the binding of the transcription factors C/EBPα, HMGA1, D-binding protein (DBP) and ZF5. We showed that the expression haplotypes also correlated with changes in the expression of other genes in normal breast. Furthermore, there was suggestive evidence that the minor allele of SNP rs4942440, which is associated with higher BRCA2 expression, is also associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Our work provides further insights into the role of cis-regulatory variation in the penetrance of disease-causing mutations. We identified small-effect genetic variants associated with allelic expression differences in BRCA2 which could possibly affect the risk in mutation carriers through altering expression levels of the wild-type allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Teresa Maia
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, Gambelas Campus, Building 7, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Martin O'Reilly
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Shamith Samarajiwa
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Mark Dunning
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Christiana Kartsonaki
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Suet-Feung Chin
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Christina N Curtis
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, University of Algarve, Portugal
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Susan Peock
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Ros Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Rd, Belmont, Sutton Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 7th floor, Borough Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Ward 10, 3rd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton, SO16 5YA, UK
| | - GEMO Study Collaborators
- GEMO Study Collaborators: Cancer Genetics Network "Groupe Génétique et Cancer", Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, France
| | - Olga M Sinilnikova
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75248 Paris cedex 05, France
- Unité INSERM U830, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75248 Paris cedex 05, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
| | | | - Laurence Faivre
- Centre de Génétique, CHU Dijon, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon F-21000, France
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue Professeur Marion 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Laurence Venat-Bouvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Capucine Delnatte
- Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod 44805 St Herblain Cedex, Nantes, France
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. BOX 700, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street Southwest Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, KS City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Maria Adelaide Caligo
- Division of Surgical, Molecular and Ultrastructural Pathology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa and Pisa University Hospital, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur 16, level 4 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - kConFab Investigators
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - Xiaoqing Chen
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Sue Healey
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Bruce AJ Ponder
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chisholm KM, Aubert SD, Freese KP, Zakian VA, King MC, Welcsh PL. A genomewide screen for suppressors of Alu-mediated rearrangements reveals a role for PIF1. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30748. [PMID: 22347400 PMCID: PMC3276492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2011] [Accepted: 12/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Alu-mediated rearrangement of tumor suppressor genes occurs frequently during carcinogenesis. In breast cancer, this mechanism contributes to loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in inherited disease and to loss of heterozygosity in sporadic cancer. To identify genes required for suppression of Alu-mediated recombination we performed a genomewide screen of a collection of 4672 yeast gene deletion mutants using a direct repeat recombination assay. The primary screen and subsequent analysis identified 12 candidate genes including TSA, ELG1, and RRM3, which are known to play a significant role in maintaining genomic stability. Genetic analysis of the corresponding human homologs was performed in sporadic breast tumors and in inherited BRCA1-associated carcinomas. Sequencing of these genes in high risk breast cancer families revealed a potential role for the helicase PIF1 in cancer predisposition. PIF1 variant L319P was identified in three breast cancer families; importantly, this variant, which is predicted to be functionally damaging, was not identified in a large series of controls nor has it been reported in either dbSNP or the 1000 Genomes Project. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pfh1 is required to maintain both mitochondrial and nuclear genomic integrity. Functional studies in yeast of human PIF1 L319P revealed that this variant cannot complement the essential functions of Pfh1 in either the nucleus or mitochondria. Our results provide a global view of nonessential genes involved in suppressing Alu-mediated recombination and implicate variation in PIF1 in breast cancer predisposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Chisholm
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Pankratz VS, Fredericksen Z, Tarrell R, Karaus M, McGuffog L, Pharaoh PD, Ponder BA, Dunning AM, Peock S, Cook M, Oliver C, Frost D, Sinilnikova OM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Mazoyer S, Houdayer C, Hogervorst FB, Hooning MJ, Ligtenberg MJ, Spurdle A, Chenevix-Trench G, Schmutzler RK, Wappenschmidt B, Engel C, Meindl A, Domchek SM, Nathanson KL, Rebbeck TR, Singer CF, Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Dressler C, Fink A, Szabo CI, Zikan M, Foretova L, Claes K, Thomas G, Hoover RN, Hunter DJ, Chanock SJ, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Couch FJ. Common variants associated with breast cancer in genome-wide association studies are modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19:2886-97. [PMID: 20418484 PMCID: PMC2893806 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2010] [Accepted: 04/21/2010] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that significantly modify breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Since these risk modifiers were originally identified as genetic risk factors for breast cancer in genome-wide association studies (GWASs), additional risk modifiers for BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be identified from promising signals discovered in breast cancer GWAS. A total of 350 SNPs identified as candidate breast cancer risk factors (P < 1 x 10(-3)) in two breast cancer GWAS studies were genotyped in 3451 BRCA1 and 2006 BRCA2 mutation carriers from nine centers. Associations with breast cancer risk were assessed using Cox models weighted for penetrance. Eight SNPs in BRCA1 carriers and 12 SNPs in BRCA2 carriers, representing an enrichment over the number expected, were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (P(trend) < 0.01). The minor alleles of rs6138178 in SNRPB and rs6602595 in CAMK1D displayed the strongest associations in BRCA1 carriers (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.90, P(trend) = 3.6 x 10(-4) and HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.41, P(trend) = 4.2 x 10(-4)), whereas rs9393597 in LOC134997 and rs12652447 in FBXL7 showed the strongest associations in BRCA2 carriers (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.25-1.92, P(trend) = 6 x 10(-5) and HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.62, P(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-4)). The magnitude and direction of the associations were consistent with the original GWAS. In subsequent risk assessment studies, the loci appeared to interact multiplicatively for breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Promising candidate SNPs from GWAS were identified as modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Upon further validation, these SNPs together with other genetic and environmental factors may improve breast cancer risk assessment in these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and
| | | | | | - Robert Tarrell
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary Karaus
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | | | | | | | - Susan Peock
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Margaret Cook
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Clare Oliver
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Debra Frost
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - EMBRACE
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Olga M. Sinilnikova
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- Equipe labellisée LIGUE 2008, UMR5201 CNRS, Centre Léon Bérard, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Claude Houdayer
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - GEMO
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- INSERM U509, Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Frans B.L. Hogervorst
- Department of Pathology, Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus, The Netherlands
| | | | - HEBON
- Department of Pathology, Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amanda Spurdle
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | | | - kConFab
- kConFab (Kathleen Cunningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer), Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michal Zikan
- Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Kathleen Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gilles Thomas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robert N. Hoover
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA and
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Advanced Technology Center, National Cancer Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit and
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Figueiredo JC, Haile RW, Bernstein JL. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2009. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-009-0020-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
5
|
Gao B, Xie XJ, Huang C, Shames DS, Chen TTL, Lewis CM, Bian A, Zhang B, Olopade OI, Garber JE, Euhus DM, Tomlinson GE, Minna JD. RASSF1A polymorphism A133S is associated with early onset breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer Res 2008; 68:22-5. [PMID: 18172292 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-5183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A regulates cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and microtubule stability and is inactivated by promoter methylation in approximately 50% of breast cancers. It has been shown previously that the polymorphism A133S in RASSF1A reduces its ability to regulate cell cycle progression and this polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. We analyzed the frequency of RASSF1A A133S in 190 Caucasian women without breast cancer and 653 patients with breast cancer including 138 BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers, 395 non-BRCA1/2 mutations carriers, and 120 untested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Patients with breast cancer had a higher frequency of A133S than the controls [P = 0.017; odds ratios (OR), 1.71; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 1.10-2.66]. There is also a higher frequency of A133S in patients with higher familial breast cancer risk (P = 0.029; OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.06-2.92) and patients carrying BRCA1/2 mutations (P = 0.037, OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.18). Importantly, we found that the co-occurrence of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and A133S in RASSF1A was associated with earlier onset of breast cancer compared with those individuals with either a BRCA1/2 mutation or the A133S polymorphism alone (36.0 versus 42.0 years old, P = 0.002). Our data suggest that the presence of the RASSF1A A133S polymorphism is associated with breast cancer pathogenesis in general and modifies breast cancer age of onset in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers. Our results warrant a large-scale study to examine the effect of the A133S polymorphism in the development of breast and other types of cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boning Gao
- Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8593, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Use of association studies to define genetic modifiers of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2008; 7:233-44. [PMID: 18283561 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9181-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2007] [Accepted: 01/02/2008] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Though much progress has been made in understanding the role of two major high-risk breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, it remains unclear what causes the observed variation in risk between mutation carriers. This marked variability in individual cancer risk both between and within BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier families may be partly explained by modifier genes that influence mutation penetrance. Defining these modifiers should help refine individual cancer risk estimates and is also expected to be an efficient method to identify further BC susceptibility alleles in general. This approach is predicated on the concept that variants in genes that are low to moderate penetrance predisposition genes are likely to have a larger risk modification effect in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Association studies are usually used to assess the influence of variants in biologically plausible candidate loci on the penetrance of BRCA1/2 mutations (i.e., differences in age of onset or tissue-specificity of disease). Several such modifier loci, including the genes AIB1 and AR involved in hormone metabolism, and the RAD51 gene acting in DNA repair, have been proposed in the literature. A consortium of laboratories (CIMBA) has recently confirmed the RAD51 135 G/C variant as a BC risk modifier in BRCA2 mutation carriers, though not in BRCA1 carriers. This review describes molecular epidemiological efforts to evaluate the potential influence of polymorphic variants in candidate modifier genes on the risk of BC conferred by the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Heterozygous screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies dosage-sensitive genes that affect chromosome stability. Genetics 2008; 178:1193-207. [PMID: 18245329 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.084103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Current techniques for identifying mutations that convey a small increased cancer risk or those that modify cancer risk in carriers of highly penetrant mutations are limited by the statistical power of epidemiologic studies, which require screening of large populations and candidate genes. To identify dosage-sensitive genes that mediate genomic stability, we performed a genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for heterozygous mutations that increase chromosome instability in a checkpoint-deficient diploid strain. We used two genome stability assays sensitive enough to detect the impact of heterozygous mutations and identified 172 heterozygous gene disruptions that affected chromosome fragment (CF) loss, 45% of which also conferred modest but statistically significant instability of endogenous chromosomes. Analysis of heterozygous deletion of 65 of these genes demonstrated that the majority increased genomic instability in both checkpoint-deficient and wild-type backgrounds. Strains heterozygous for COMA kinetochore complex genes were particularly unstable. Over 50% of the genes identified in this screen have putative human homologs, including CHEK2, ERCC4, and TOPBP1, which are already associated with inherited cancer susceptibility. These findings encourage the incorporation of this orthologous gene list into cancer epidemiology studies and suggest further analysis of heterozygous phenotypes in yeast as models of human disease resulting from haplo-insufficiency.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rippy L, Marsden J. Is HRT justified for symptom management in women at higher risk of developing breast cancer? Climacteric 2007; 9:404-15. [PMID: 17085372 DOI: 10.1080/13697130601022367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most efficacious intervention for the treatment of estrogen-deficiency symptoms. Prescriptions for HRT have fallen over the last 3 years due to anxiety provoked about breast cancer risk and recurrence that has been generated by recent clinical trials. In women at population risk of breast cancer, these trials have not shown risks greater than estimates from clinical trial evidence that predated them. For women at increased breast cancer risk due to a family history or high-risk benign breast conditions, clinical trial data are limited but suggest a lack of an additive effect of HRT on risk. In symptomatic breast cancer survivors, observational data suggest no increase in recurrence but these data are open to bias. Interim analyses of large, randomized trials have shown contradictory outcomes and, as a result, three large HRT randomized trials have now been closed. The randomized LIBERATE trial evaluating tibolone in breast cancer survivors is fully recruited and continuing. The current clinical climate is 'HRT adverse' but, due to a lack of effective alternatives for symptom relief, women at higher breast cancer risk and breast cancer survivors are still requesting information about HRT. In this situation, discussion of the current clinical uncertainty surrounding the use of HRT must be undertaken to ensure that women are adequately informed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Rippy
- King's Breast Care, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Five percent of breast cancers are associated with a genetic predisposition, transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait of either maternal or paternal origin. Mutations of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer and depend in part on these predispositions. The objectives of an oncogenetic consultation are to understand the origin of a personal and family history of breast cancer by using the resources of formal and molecular genetics and to guide the management of the consulting patient and her relatives. The diagnostic genetic test performed from an "index case" is intended to identify genetic alterations specific to each family. The failure to identify a mutation in a diagnostic test does not rule out the existence of a predisposing factor. On the other hand, the identification of a mutation makes it possible to offer a simple test to relatives, and its negative result can provide reassurance. Optimal management of patients with a mutation of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes requires frequent clinical examinations and at least annual imaging (mammography, ultrasound or breast MRI as part of a protocol) from the age of 25-30 years. Prophylactic mastectomy may be envisioned. Prophylactic adnexectomy is also usually recommended to prevent ovarian cancer, around the age of 40 years.
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith A, Moran A, Boyd MC, Bulman M, Shenton A, Smith L, Iddenden R, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Maher ER, Evans DGR. Phenocopies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: evidence for modifier genes and implications for screening. J Med Genet 2007; 44:10-15. [PMID: 17079251 PMCID: PMC2597903 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2006] [Revised: 07/11/2006] [Accepted: 07/19/2006] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in familial breast cancer kindreds allows genetic testing of at-risk relatives. Those who test negative are usually reassured and additional breast cancer surveillance is discontinued. However, we postulated that in high-risk families, such as those seen in clinical genetics centres, the risk of breast cancer might be influenced not only by the BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation but also by modifier genes. One manifestation of this would be the presence of phenocopies in BRCA1/BRCA2 kindreds. METHODS 277 families with pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations were reviewed and 28 breast cancer phenocopies identified. The relative risk of breast cancer in those testing negative was assessed using incidence rates from our cancer registry based on local population. RESULTS Phenocopies constituted up to 24% of tests on women with breast cancer after the identification of the mutation in the proband. The standardised incidence ratio for women who tested negative for the BRCA1/BRCA2 family mutation was 5.3 for all relatives, 5.0 for all first-degree relatives (FDRs) and 3.2 (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 4.9) for FDRs in whose family all other cases of breast and ovarian cancer could be explained by the identified mutation. 13 of 107 (12.1%) FDRs with breast cancer and no unexplained family history tested negative. CONCLUSION In high-risk families, women who test negative for the familial BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation have an increased risk of breast cancer consistent with genetic modifiers. In light of this, such women should still be considered for continued surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Smith
- Academic Unit of Medical Genetics and Regional Genetics Service, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bramley M, Clarke RB, Howell A, Evans DGR, Armer T, Baildam AD, Anderson E. Effects of oestrogens and anti-oestrogens on normal breast tissue from women bearing BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:1021-8. [PMID: 16538216 PMCID: PMC2361237 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
There is considerable interest in whether anti-oestrogens can be used to prevent breast cancer in women bearing mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The effects of oestradiol (E2), tamoxifen (TAM) and fulvestrant (FUL) on proliferation and steroid receptor expression were assessed in normal breast epithelium taken from women at varying risks of breast cancer and implanted into athymic nude mice, which were treated with E2 in the presence and absence of TAM or FUL. Tissue samples were taken at various time points thereafter for assessment of proliferative activity and expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ERα and PgR) by immunohistochemistry. Oestradiol increased proliferation in the breast epithelium from women carrying mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, those otherwise at increased risk and those at population risk of breast cancer. This increase was reduced by both TAM and FUL in all risk groups. In the absence of E2, PgR expression was reduced in all risk groups but significantly more so in the BRCA-mutated groups. Subsequent E2 treatment caused a rapid, complete induction of PgR expression in the population-risk group but not in the high-risk or BRCA-mutated groups in which PgR induction was significantly delayed. These data suggest that the mechanisms by which E2 induces breast epithelial PgR expression are impaired in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, whereas those regulating proliferation remain intact. We conclude that early anti-oestrogen treatment should prevent breast cancer in very high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bramley
- Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
- Clinical Research Department, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
| | - R B Clarke
- Clinical Research Department, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
- Breast Biology Group, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. E-mail:
| | - A Howell
- CR-UK Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
| | - D G R Evans
- University Department of Medical Genetics and Regional Genetics Service, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 0JH, USA
| | - T Armer
- Clinical Research Department, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
| | - A D Baildam
- Department of Surgery, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
| | - E Anderson
- Clinical Research Department, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diagnostic génétique du cancer du sein et de l’ovaire héréditaire. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s1776-9817(05)80643-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
13
|
Koren-Michowitz M, Friedman E, Gershoni-Baruch R, Brok-Simoni F, Patael Y, Rechavi G, Amariglio N. Coinheritance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with Fanconi anemia and Bloom syndrome mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish population: possible role in risk modification for cancer development. Am J Hematol 2005; 78:203-6. [PMID: 15726604 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) and Bloom syndrome (BS) are rare autosomal recessive genetic disorders manifesting in childhood, with a predisposition to cancer development in adolescence and adulthood. Both syndromes are relatively prevalent among the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and, in both syndromes, mutations specific to this population have been identified. Similarly, unique Ashkenazi mutations were found in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. These two genes, when mutated, play important roles in familial breast and ovarian carcinogenesis. The genes involved in the pathogenesis of the FA and BS belong to the general class of instability genes. Heterozygosity for the FA gene has no known promalignant potential, while the BS mutation carrier state was associated with an increased frequency of colorectal cancer. The especially frequent carrier state among the Ashkenazi Jewish population coupled with the high prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the same population has led us to search for coinheritance affecting the potential for cancer development. One hundred Ashkenazi women with known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were screened for the FA mutation IVS4+4 A-->T and the BS mutation blm(Ash). Our results indicate that there is an increased prevalence of both FA and BS mutation carriers among the population studied compared with the general Ashkenazi population (prevalence of FA mutation 4/100 women [4%] as compared to 35/3104 previously published controls [1.1%], P=0.031, and for BS mutation 3/100 [3.2%] as compared to 36/4001 [0.9%], P=0.058). There was no statistically significant effect of the coinheritance on cancer prevalence, type of cancer, or age of cancer onset. Coinheritance of FA and/or BS mutations seems to be more prevalent among BRCA mutation carriers, but a larger study encompassing more women may help in clarifying this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Koren-Michowitz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Palli D, Masala G, Mariani-Costantini R, Zanna I, Saieva C, Sera F, Decarli A, Ottini L. A gene-environment interaction between occupation and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in male breast cancer? Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:2474-9. [PMID: 15519522 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2004] [Revised: 06/21/2004] [Accepted: 07/16/2004] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The association of male breast cancer (MBC) with a positive breast cancer (BC) family history and with BRCA1/2 germ-line mutations points to a genetic component; a relationship with occupation has also been reported. Recently, we identified pathogenetic BRCA1/2 mutations in a population-based series of Italian MBC patients: here in, we investigated interactions between a carrier status for BRCA1/2 mutations and occupation using a case-case design and estimating case-only odds ratios (CORs). Truck-driving was the most frequent occupation (3/4 BRCA-related cases and 2/19 unrelated cases). An interaction between carrier status and working as a truck-driver emerged, when we classified MBC cases as "ever/never-held" this job title (COR 25.5; 95% Confidence Limits (CL): 1.1-1,412.5) or according to truck-driving as the "longest-held" work (COR 54.0; 95% CL: 1.6-2,997.5). The possible modifying effect on MBC risk in subjects carrying BRCA1/2 germ-line mutations of an occupation characterised by exposure to chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) that are capable of inducing DNA damage, may provide clues to the role of environmental exposures in modifying BC risk in mutation carriers in both genders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Palli
- Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, CSPO, Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The cloning of two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in 1994 and 1995 and the subsequent development of commercial genetic testing has brought hereditary cancer genetics into the public eye. In addition to DNA-based genetic testing, new strategies and treatments have been developed to provide accurate assessment of cancer risk and to reduce the chances of cancer developing in the future. This increasing scientific and public attention has prompted some cancer patients and their families to find out whether they "have the cancer gene" and has placed more responsibility on primary care clinicians to identify people who should be referred for specialized services of hereditary cancer genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duane Culler
- Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1500, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kallianpur AR, Hall LD, Yadav M, Christman BW, Dittus RS, Haines JL, Parl FF, Summar ML. Increased Prevalence of the HFE C282Y Hemochromatosis Allele in Women with Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13:205-12. [PMID: 14973098 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-03-0188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Individuals with the major hemochromatosis (HFE) allele C282Y and iron overload develop hepatocellular and some extrahepatic malignancies at increased rates. No association has been previously reported between the C282Y allele and breast cancer. We hypothesized that due to the pro-oxidant properties of iron, altered iron metabolism in C282Y carriers may promote breast carcinogenesis. Because 1 in 10 Caucasians of Northern European ancestry carries this allele, any impact it may have on breast cancer burden is potentially great. We determined C282Y genotypes in 168 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell transplantation for cancer: 41 with breast cancer and 127 with predominantly hematological cancers (transplant cohort). Demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics were reviewed in breast cancer patients. The frequency of C282Y genotypes in breast cancers was compared with the frequency in nonbreast cancers, an outpatient sample from Tennessee (n = 169), and a published United States national sample. The frequency of at least one C282Y allele in breast cancers was higher (36.6%, 5 homozygotes/10 heterozygotes) than frequencies in Tennessee (12.7%, P < 0.001), the general population (12.4%, P < 0.001), and similarly selected nonbreast cancers (17.0%, P = 0.008). The likelihood of breast cancer in the transplant cohort increased with C282Y allele dose (P(trend) = 0.010). These results were supported by the finding in a nontransplant cohort of a higher frequency of C282Y mutations in Caucasian (18.4%, P = 0.039) and African-American (8.5%, P = 0.005) women with breast cancer than race-specific national frequency estimates. A high prevalence of C282Y alleles in women with breast cancer with and without poor risk features suggests that altered iron metabolism in C282Y carriers may promote the development of breast cancer and/or more aggressive forms of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha R Kallianpur
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and VA Center for Health Services Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Cancer develops when cells no longer follow their normal pattern of controlled growth. In the absence or disregard of such regulation, resulting from changes in their genetic makeup, these errant cells acquire a growth advantage, expanding into precancerous clones. Over the past decade many studies have revealed the relevance of genomic mutation in this process, be it by misreplication, environmental damage, or a deficiency in repairing endogenous and exogenous damage. Here we discuss the possibility of homologous recombination as an errant DNA repair mechanism that can result in loss of heterozygosity or genetic rearrangements. Some of these genetic alterations may play a primary role in carcinogenesis, but they are more likely to be involved in secondary and subsequent steps of carcinogenesis by which recessive oncogenic mutations are revealed. Patients, whose cells display an increased frequency of recombination, also have an elevated frequency of cancer, further supporting the link between recombination and carcinogenesis.
Collapse
|
18
|
Whitney AR, Diehn M, Popper SJ, Alizadeh AA, Boldrick JC, Relman DA, Brown PO. Individuality and variation in gene expression patterns in human blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:1896-901. [PMID: 12578971 PMCID: PMC149930 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.252784499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 587] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The nature and extent of interindividual and temporal variation in gene expression patterns in specific cells and tissues is an important and relatively unexplored issue in human biology. We surveyed variation in gene expression patterns in peripheral blood from 75 healthy volunteers by using cDNA microarrays. Characterization of the variation in gene expression in healthy tissue is an essential foundation for the recognition and interpretation of the changes in these patterns associated with infections and other diseases, and peripheral blood was selected because it is a uniquely accessible tissue in which to examine this variation in patients or healthy volunteers in a clinical setting. Specific features of interindividual variation in gene expression patterns in peripheral blood could be traced to variation in the relative proportions of specific blood cell subsets; other features were correlated with gender, age, and the time of day at which the sample was taken. An analysis of multiple sequential samples from the same individuals allowed us to discern donor-specific patterns of gene expression. These data help to define human individuality and provide a database with which disease-associated gene expression patterns can be compared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline R Whitney
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Cancer develops when cells no longer follow their normal pattern of controlled growth. In the absence or disregard of such regulation, resulting from changes in their genetic makeup, these errant cells acquire a growth advantage, expanding into precancerous clones. Over the last decade, many studies have revealed the relevance of genomic mutation in this process, be it by misreplication, environmental damage, or a deficiency in repairing endogenous and exogenous damage. Here, we discuss homologous recombination as another mechanism that can result in a loss of heterozygosity or genetic rearrangements. Some of these genetic alterations may play a primary role in carcinogenesis, but they are more likely to be involved in secondary and subsequent steps of carcinogenesis by which recessive oncogenic mutations are revealed. Patients, whose cells display an increased frequency of recombination, also have an elevated frequency of cancer, further supporting the link between recombination and carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert H. Schiestl
- Department of Pathology, UCLA Medical School, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|