Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Neurostimulation in Childhood Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder in children, and approximately a third of them have ongoing seizures despite adequate trial of antiseizure medications. Neurostimulation approaches may be an option for those with drug resistant epilepsy. Several invasive and non-invasive devices have been trialled and found to be effective in reducing seizure burden in drug resistant epilepsy. These techniques appear to be safe and well tolerated. We review the available evidence for the use of these devices, including vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. The results of trials are promising but there are fewer studies in children. Apart from vagus nerve stimulation, none of the other neurostimulation techniques are currently approved for use in children and their use is off-label or in clinical trials. Further well-designed trials are needed, especially in children, to identify the most effective neurostimulation options and optimal parameters for improvement of seizure burden and quality of life. Neurostimulation techniques are also being trialled for treatment of refractory status epilepticus, but lack of robust evidence (mainly case studies or case series reports) makes it difficult to predict therapeutic benefit at present.

Neuroplasticity and Nervous System Recovery: Cellular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Advances, and Future Prospects

Neuroplasticity, the ability of the nervous system to adapt structurally and functionally in response to environmental interactions and injuries, is a cornerstone of recovery in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous systems (PNS). This review explores the mechanisms underlying neuroplasticity, focusing on the dynamic roles of cellular and molecular processes in recovery from nervous system injuries. Key cellular players, including Schwann cells, oligodendrocytes, and neural stem cells, are highlighted for their contributions to nerve repair, myelination, and regeneration. Advances in therapeutic interventions, such as electrical stimulation, bioluminescent optogenetics, and innovative nerve grafting techniques, are discussed alongside their potential to enhance recovery and functional outcomes. The molecular underpinnings of plasticity, involving synaptic remodeling, homeostatic mechanisms, and activity-dependent regulation of gene expression, are elucidated to illustrate their role in learning, memory, and injury repair. Integrating emerging technologies and therapeutic approaches with a foundational understanding of neuroplasticity offers a pathway toward more effective strategies for restoring nervous system functionality after injury.

Noninvasive brain stimulation as focal epilepsy treatment in the hospital, clinic, and home

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) provides a treatment option for patients not eligible for surgical intervention or who seek low-risk approaches and may be used in the hospital, clinic, and at home. Our objective is to summarize our single-center experience with multiple NIBS approaches for the treatment of focal epilepsy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients who received NIBS as an epilepsy treatment at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were typically treated as follows: (1) for TMS, 1 Hz stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the neuromodulation clinic, (2) for outpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the clinic, followed by optional treatment at home, and (3) for inpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for three consecutive days. We analyzed continuous EEG data for the inpatient tDCS cohort and available HD-EEG data for outpatient cohorts to quantify changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as a result of stimulation. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month for TMS and outpatient tDCS and 1 week for inpatient tDCS.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were treated with TMS (n = 10) and tDCS (n = 14, 9 as outpatients). The median age was 40 years (range 15-73). The median seizure reduction following stimulation was 50%. Fourteen patients (58%) were responders to treatment (TMS = 4/10, tDCS Outpatient = 7/9, tDCS Inpatient = 3/5). Five outpatient tDCS participants elected to continue treatment at home. Four TMS and four outpatient tDCS patients underwent high-density EEG before and after 5 days of therapy. Following stimulation, IED rate was reduced in 4/5 inpatient tDCS patients, 4/4 outpatient tDCS patients, and 4/4 TMS patients. Two patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency (1 following TMS and 1 following outpatient tDCS), which returned to baseline 4-6 weeks after stimulation treatments were discontinued.

SIGNIFICANCE

TMS and tDCS are potential treatment approaches for drug-resistant focal epilepsy patients in the hospital, clinic, and home. They have a favorable safety profile and can lead to a reduction in IED rates and seizures. These results suggest further studies are needed to examine NIBS as a treatment for epilepsy.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Noninvasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, offers new treatment options for patients with focal seizures. This study reviewed the experience at Mayo Clinic using noninvasive brain stimulation in the hospital, clinic, and at-home settings to treat seizures. The results showed an overall 50% median seizure reduction, and 58% of patients had at least a 50% reduction in seizures. Noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising treatment approach with a favorable safety profile.

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation as Focal Epilepsy Treatment in the Hospital, Clinic, and Home

Introduction

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) provides a treatment option for patients not eligible for surgical intervention or who seek low-risk approaches and may be used in the hospital, clinic and at home. Our objective is to summarize our single-center experience with multiple NIBS approaches for the treatment of focal epilepsy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified drug resistant focal epilepsy patients who received NIBS as an epilepsy treatment at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were typically treated as follows: (1) for TMS, 1 Hz stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the neuromodulation clinic, (2) for outpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for five consecutive days in the clinic, followed by optional treatment at home (3) for inpatient tDCS, stimulation was applied for three consecutive days. We analyzed continuous EEG data for the inpatient tDCS cohort and available HD-EEG data for outpatient cohorts to quantify changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as a result of stimulation. Outcomes were assessed at 1-month for TMS and outpatient tDCS and 1-week for inpatient tDCS.

Results

24 patients were treated with TMS (n=10) and tDCS (n=14, 9 as outpatients). The median age was 40 years (range 15-73). The median seizure reduction following stimulation was 50%. 14 patients (58 %) were responders to treatment (TMS=4/10, tDCS Outpatient =7/9, tDCS Inpatient=3/5). Five outpatient tDCS participants elected to continue treatment at home. 4 TMS and 4 outpatient tDCS underwent high density EEG before and after 5 days of therapy. Following stimulation, IED rate was reduced in 4/5 inpatient tDCS patients, 4/4 outpatient tDCS patients, and 4/4 TMS patients. Two patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency (1 following TMS and 1 following outpatient tDCS), which returned to baseline 4-6 weeks after stimulation treatments were discontinued.

Conclusions

TMS and tDCS are potential treatment approaches for drug resistant focal epilepsy patients in the hospital, clinic, and home. They have a favorable safety profile and can lead to a reduction in IEDs rates and seizures. These results suggest further studies are needed to examine NIBS as treatment for epilepsy.

Efficacy and acceptability of brain stimulation for anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and acceptability of brain stimulation techniques (BSTs) for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and HowNet databases for studies published before September 10, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that involved deep brain stimulation (DBS), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), sham therapy, or health control were included for analysis. The primary outcome was efficacy, while acceptability was considered as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 1333 patients with various anxiety disorders including social anxiety disorder, general anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social panic, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and agoraphobia, recruited from 41 trials with 86 treatment arms. Network meta-analysis showed that some BSTs had higher efficacy compared to controls, including DBS, ECT, cathodal tDCS, high-frequency rTMS (hf-rTMS), anodal tDCS, and low-frequency rTMS (lf-rTMS). Furthermore, hf-rTMS, lf-rTMS, and ECT had high acceptability in terms of odds ratio (OR).

LIMITATIONS

This study has limitations, including a focus on specific types of brain stimulation for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD and not considering factors like stimulation parameters. Future research should explore a broader range of technologies and parameters across various psychiatric and neurological conditions.

CONCLUSION

The study results suggest that BSTs are effective treatments for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD; lf-rTMS may be considered as the most promising option.

Language Mapping With rTMS in Healthy Pediatric Patients

PURPOSE

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a potentially effective, noninvasive tool for language mapping. However, there is a paucity of data in pediatric patients. In this study, we aimed to map language sites in healthy pediatric participants with navigated rTMS.

METHODS

Children aged 5 to 18 years underwent bilateral language mapping. Stimulation was delivered at 5 Hz during visual-naming and auditory verb-generation tasks in 1 to 2 second bursts. We targeted 33 standardized sites per hemisphere. In total, 34 participants completed the visual-naming task, and 27 participants completed the verb-generation task. Lateralization index (LI) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to assess language lateralization. A difference of least squares means model was developed to determine the prevalence of visual-naming and verb-generation errors within lobar and hemispheric regions.

RESULTS

Weak left lateralization was observed for visual naming (LI 0.14; p = 0.038), and no lateralization was observed for verb generation (LI 0.08; p = 0.269). Using multiple least squares regression, left hemisphere errors were more likely to occur than right hemisphere errors for visual naming (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.06-1.44), but no lateralization effect was observed for verb-generation errors (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.93-1.27).

CONCLUSIONS

rTMS is likely to identify bilateral or weakly left-lateralized language sites in pediatric patients during language tasks. Although rTMS can be a useful noninvasive method for identifying potential language-positive sites, our results in healthy controls suggest that it cannot be used as a singular method for language mapping in the preoperative setting.

Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation to treat drug-resistant epilepsy: A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent brain diseases. Approximately one third of patients consistently experience drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), a condition where seizures persist despite the use of antiseizure medications. Exploration of new therapies for DRE is urgently needed. In this single-center, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial (NCT05042726), we aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of transcranial magnetic continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) targeting the cerebellum to treat DRE.

METHODS

Patients with DRE for ≥2 years and a seizure frequency of ≥2 seizures per month were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive active stimulation followed by sham stimulation or vice versa. The bilateral cerebellum was targeted by navigated cTBS focusing on the cerebellar dentate nucleus, once daily on workdays for 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were the percentage of seizure reduction and 50% responder rate in the per-protocol population within 2 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled and randomized; 18 patients in the active stimulation-first group and 20 in the sham stimulation-first group were included in the final analysis. Active cTBS significantly reduced seizures compared to sham stimulation (difference in percentage of seizure reduction between treatments = 25%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5%-46%, p = .018). The 50% responder rate after active stimulation was significantly higher than that after sham stimulation (difference in 50% responder rate between treatments = 24%, 95% CI = 11%-40%, p = .029). Adverse events occasionally occurred during active stimulation (moderate headache in 5% of patients, tinnitus in 3% of patients, dizziness in 3% of patients) but resolved spontaneously within days after treatment completion.

SIGNIFICANCE

This trial suggested that cTBS targeting the cerebellum was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of DRE. Further studies are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and mechanism.

Focused ultrasound for treatment of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies

Various preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the neuromodulatory and ablative effects of focused ultrasound (FUS). However, the safety and efficacy of FUS in clinical settings for treating epilepsy have not been well established. This study aims to provide a systematic review of all preclinical and clinical studies that have used FUS for the treatment of epilepsy. A systematic search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases. All preclinical and clinical studies reporting outcomes of FUS in the treatment of epilepsy were included in the systematic review. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine safety in clinical studies and seizure activity reduction in preclinical studies. A total of 24 articles were included in the study. Meta-analysis demonstrated that adverse events occurred in 13% (95% CI = 2-57%) of patients with epilepsy who underwent FUS. The frequency of adverse events was higher with the use of FUS for lesioning (36%, 95% CI = 4-88%) in comparison to neuromodulation (5%, 95% CI = 0-71%), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.31). Three-level meta-analysis in preclinical studies demonstrated a reduced spike rate in neuromodulating FUS compared to the control group (P = 0.02). According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, FUS can be considered a safe and feasible approach for treating epileptic seizures, especially in drug-resistant patients. While the efficacy of FUS has been demonstrated in several preclinical studies, further research is necessary to confirm its effectiveness in clinical practice and to determine the adverse events.

Clinical trials for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Challenges and priorities

OBJECTIVE

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe, childhood-onset epilepsy that is typically refractory to treatment. We surveyed the current landscape of LGS treatment, aiming to identify challenges to the development of efficacious therapies, and to articulate corresponding priorities toward clinical trials that improve outcomes.

METHODS

The LGS Special Interest Group of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium integrated evidence from the literature and expert opinion, into a narrative review.

RESULTS

We provide an overview of approved and emerging medical, dietary, surgical and neuromodulation approaches for LGS. We note that quality of care could be improved by standardizing LGS treatment based on expert consensus and empirical data. Whereas LGS natural history is incompletely understood, prospective studies and use of large retrospective datasets to understand LGS across the lifespan would enable clinical trials that address these dynamics. Recent discoveries related to LGS pathophysiology should enable development of disease-modifying therapies, which are currently lacking. Finally, clinical trials have focused chiefly on seizures involving "drops," but should incorporate additional patient-centered outcomes, using emerging measures adapted to people with LGS.

INTERPRETATION

Clinicians and researchers should enact these priorities, with the goal of patient-centered clinical trials that are tailored to LGS pathophysiology and natural history.

Increased cerebellar vermis volume following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a voxel-based morphometry study

Introduction

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was applied to explore structural changes induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and the relationship with clinical outcomes. Moreover, the relationship between each segmented regional gray matter (GM) volume was investigated to identify circuits involved in the rTMS treatment process in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

Methods

Nineteen patients with DRE were finally included in the analysis. A session of rTMS was applied for 5 consecutive days. Participants received either 1,000 or 3,000 pulses, at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and the intensity was set at 90% of the individual's resting motor threshold. VBM analysis was performed to explore regional GM volume changes 2 months after rTMS application. The regional volume change was correlated with seizure reduction rate. Relationships between changes in GM volume in each anatomically parcellated region were analyzed using a fully-automated segmentation pipeline.

Results

Compared to the baseline, seizure frequency was reduced, and quality of life was improved after rTMS treatment. Regional volume was increased in the cerebellar vermis 2 months after rTMS application. The increased cerebellar vermis volume correlated with the reduced seizure frequency. Regional volume changes in the cerebellar vermis were correlated with changes in the subcortical and cortical GM regions including the thalamus, caudate, and frontal cortex.

Discussion

These results indicate that rTMS treatment effectively reduced seizure frequency in patients with DRE. Increased volume in the cerebellar vermis and activations of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit may be a crucial mechanism underlying the effectiveness of rTMS application in patients with DRE.

Targeting thalamocortical circuits for closed-loop stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

This paper outlines the therapeutic rationale and neurosurgical targeting technique for bilateral, closed-loop, thalamocortical stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, a severe form of childhood-onset epilepsy. Thalamic stimulation can be an effective treatment for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but complete seizure control is rarely achieved. Outcomes may be improved by stimulating areas beyond the thalamus, including cortex, but the optimal targets are unknown. We aimed to identify a cortical target by synthesizing prior neuroimaging studies, and to use this knowledge to advance a dual thalamic (centromedian) and cortical (frontal) approach for closed-loop stimulation. Multi-modal brain network maps from three group-level studies of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome were averaged to define the area of peak overlap: simultaneous EEG-functional MRI of generalized paroxysmal fast activity, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET of cortical hypometabolism and diffusion MRI structural connectivity associated with clinical efficacy in a previous trial of thalamic deep brain stimulation. The resulting 'hotspot' was used as a seed in a normative functional MRI connectivity analysis to identify connected networks. Intracranial electrophysiology was reviewed in the first two trial patients undergoing bilateral implantations guided by this hotspot. Simultaneous recordings from cortex and thalamus were analysed for presence and synchrony of epileptiform activity. The peak overlap was in bilateral premotor cortex/caudal middle frontal gyrus. Functional connectivity of this hotspot revealed a distributed network of frontoparietal cortex resembling the diffuse abnormalities seen on EEG-functional MRI and PET. Intracranial electrophysiology showed characteristic epileptiform activity of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in both the cortical hotspot and thalamus; most detected events occurred first in the cortex before appearing in the thalamus. Premotor frontal cortex shows peak involvement in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and functional connectivity of this region resembles the wider epileptic brain network. Thus, it may be an optimal target for a range of neuromodulation therapies, including thalamocortical stimulation and emerging non-invasive treatments like focused ultrasound or transcranial magnetic stimulation. Compared to thalamus-only approaches, the addition of this cortical target may allow more rapid detections of seizures, more diverse stimulation paradigms and broader modulation of the epileptic network. A prospective, multi-centre trial of closed-loop thalamocortical stimulation for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is currently underway.

Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychological distress in advanced cancer: A phase 2a feasibility and preliminary efficacy clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Psychological and existential suffering affects many people with advanced illness, and current therapeutic options have limited effectiveness. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective therapy for refractory depression, but no previous study has used rTMS to treat psychological or existential distress in the palliative setting.

AIM

To determine whether a 5-day course of "accelerated" rTMS is feasible and can improve psychological and/or existential distress in a palliative care setting.

DESIGN

Open-label, single arm, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy study of intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, 600 pulses/session, 8 sessions/day (once per hour) for 5 days. The outcomes were the rates of recruitment, completion of intervention, and follow-up (Feasibility); and the proportion of participants achieving 50% improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 2 weeks post-treatment (Preliminary Efficacy).

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Adults admitted to our academic Palliative Care Unit with advanced illness, life expectancy >1 month and psychological distress.

RESULTS

Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related interruptions, a total of nine participants were enrolled between August 2021 and April 2023. Two withdrew before starting rTMS, one stopped due to clinical deterioration unrelated to rTMS, and six completed the rTMS treatment. Five of six participants had a >50% improvement in HDRS, HADS-Anxiety, or both between baseline and the 2 week follow up; the sixth died prior to the 2-week follow-up. In this small sample, mean depression scores decreased from baseline to 2 weeks post-treatment (HDRS 18 vs 7, p = 0.03). Side effects of rTMS included transient mild scalp discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated rTMS improved symptoms of depression, anxiety, or both in this small feasibility and preliminary efficacy study. A larger, sham-controlled study is warranted to determine whether rTMS could be an effective, acceptable, and scalable treatment in the palliative setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04257227.

Time-effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS for epilepsy and improvement in cognitive function in patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating epilepsy.

METHODS

An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Weipu, and Wanfang databases was conducted to select randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of low-frequency rTMS for epilepsy and related diseases. Outcome measures mainly included seizure frequency, response rate, and cognitive assessment score. Odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate these effects. The heterogeneity test was measured using chi-square and I2. Possible effects of covariates were investigated using meta-regressions. The sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment also was performed.

RESULTS

The retrieval time was from the establishment to February 2023. 18 RCTs were identified, including 1224 patients. The results showed that rTMS treatment reduced the frequency of the seizure in antiepileptics drugs (AEDs) therapy (SMD = -1.066, 95% CI [-1.618, -0.515]), especially in the first week after treatment (SMD = -1.641, 95% CI [-2.778, -0.503]), and significantly improved the effective rate (OR = 3.877, 95% CI [2.725, 5.515]) and cognitive assessment score (SMD = 1.038, 95% CI [0.745, 1.332]). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable, and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication biases.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence suggests that low-frequency rTMS-assisted therapy significantly improves antiepileptics drugs' efficacy and improves patients' cognitive function. This additional therapeutic effect has a certain timeliness. Limited by the quantity and quality of the selected studies, further prospective studies with more participants are needed to draw broad and accurate conclusions.

Neuromodulation Techniques in Children with Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition and medical emergency which can have lifelong consequences, including neuronal death and alteration of neuronal networks, resulting in long-term neurologic and cognitive deficits in children. When standard pharmacological treatment for SE is not successful in controlling seizures, the condition evolves to refractory SE (rSE) and finally to super-refractory SE (srSE) if it exceeds 24 h despite using anaesthetics. In this systematic review, we present literature data on the potential uses of clinical neuromodulation techniques for the management of srSE in children, including electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. The evaluation of these techniques is limited by the small number of published paediatric cases (n = 25, one with two techniques) in peer-reviewed articles (n = 18). Although neuromodulation strategies have not been tested through randomised, prospective controlled clinical trials, this review presents the existing data and the potential benefits of neuromodulation therapy, suggesting that these techniques, when available, could be considered at earlier stages within the course of srSE intending to prevent long-term neurologic complications. Clinical trials aiming to establish whether early intervention can prevent long-term sequelae are necessary in order to establish the potential clinical value of neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of srSE in children.

Effects of altered excitation-inhibition imbalance by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

Objectives

Patients with self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS) with electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES) have generalized cognitive impairment, yet treatment options are limited. Our study aimed to examine the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on SeLECTS with ESES. In addition, we applied electroencephalography (EEG) aperiodic components (offset and slope) to investigate the improvement of rTMS on the excitation-inhibition imbalance (E-I imbalance) in the brain of this group of children.

Methods

Eight SeLECTS patients with ESES were included in this study. Low-frequency rTMS (≤1 Hz) was applied for 10 weekdays in each patient. To assess the clinical efficacy and changes in E-I imbalance, EEG recordings were performed both before and after rTMS. Seizure-reduction rate and spike-wave index (SWI) were measured to investigate the clinical effects of rTMS. The aperiodic offset and slope were calculated to explore the effect of rTMS on E-I imbalance.

Results

Five of the eight patients (62.5%) were seizure-free within 3 months after stimulation, with treatment effects decreasing with longer follow-ups. The SWI decreased significantly at 3 and 6 months after rTMS compared with the baseline (P = 0.0157 and P = 0.0060, respectively). The offset and slope were compared before rTMS and within 3 months after stimulation. The results showed a significant reduction in the offset after stimulation (P < 0.0001). There was a remarkable increase in slope after the stimulation (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Patients achieved favorable outcomes in the first 3 months after rTMS. The ameliorative effect of rTMS on SWI may last up to 6 months. Low-frequency rTMS could reduce firing rates in neuronal populations throughout the brain, which was most pronounced at the site of stimulation. A significant reduction in the slope after rTMS treatment suggested an improvement in the E-I imbalance in the SeLECTS.

Literature Review of the Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Epilepsy

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), often recognized as a safe and tolerable method with promising therapeutic potential for the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, has been extensively studied by medical engineering scientists in recent decades. Epilepsy has always been one of the vital foci in the therapeutic role of rTMS, especially its low-frequency type. However, various reports, clinical trials, and review articles published in recent years have yielded conflicting results regarding the efficacy and side effects of rTMS in patients. In this review article, reviewing studies published from January 2000 to October 2021, we examined the efficacy and side effects of rTMS with a specific look at its therapeutic applications in epilepsy. Our study indicates promising results in the clinical application of this technique for patients with epilepsy. Among other things, it has the ability to reduce interictal epileptic abnormalities, does not interfere with neuropsychological function in normal people, does not worsen cognitive function and even improves Stroop function, rarely has serious side effects such as seizures and psychotic symptoms, has low risk in children as adults, and has potential for improving suicidal ideation. Despite some limitations in this study, including the small number of studies performed and the heterogeneity among studies, this review article suggests significant rtMS potentials in improving the complications of epilepsy. Our review also showed that the reported side effects of using this technique are not very common. Therefore, we can recommend further use of this technique as a promising tool in clinical research.

Continuous theta burst stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy

Introduction

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have anti-epileptic effects, especially in patients with neocortical lesions. Initial clinical trials demonstrated that the duration of the seizure reducing effect is relatively short-lived. In the context of a chronic condition like epilepsy, theta burst stimulation (TBS) may represent a potential solution in optimizing treatment practicality and durability as it was demonstrated to be associated with longer-lasting after-effects. TBS has been studied extensively in diverse neuropsychiatric conditions, but a therapeutic TBS protocol has not previously been applied in epilepsy patients.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective open-label pilot study of 4-day accelerated continuous TBS (cTBS) treatment in patients with neocortical drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). A treatment session consisted of 5 cTBS trains, each comprising 600 pulses presented in 50 Hz triplet bursts every 200 ms, delivered at 10-min intertrain-intervals, targeted over the epileptic focus (EF) using a neuronavigation-guided figure-of-8 coil. Safety and feasibility, and seizure frequency were assessed as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively, over a 4-week baseline period, a 1-week treatment period and a 7-week follow-up period, using adverse event logging, electro-encephalography, cognitive, and psychological questionnaires and a seizure diary kept by the patients and/or caregivers.

Results

Seven subjects (4M:3F; median age 48, interquartile ranges 25) underwent the treatment protocol. Adverse events were reported in all subjects but were mild and transient. No clinical or electrographic seizures were evoked during or immediately following stimulation. No deterioration was found in cognition nor in psycho-emotional well-being following treatment. Treatment burden was acceptable, but seems to depend on clinical effect, duration of ongoing effect and stimulation site. Median weekly seizure frequency and ratio of seizure-free weeks did not change significantly in this small patient cohort.

Conclusion

We report the results of the first ever trial of cTBS as a treatment for neocortical DRE. A 4-day accelerated cTBS protocol over the EF appears safe and feasible. Although the design and sample size of this open-label pilot study is unfit to reliably identify a therapeutic effect, results encourage further exploration of cTBS as an anti-epileptic treatment and potential optimization compared to conventional rTMS in a dedicated randomized controlled trial. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02635633).

Recent Advances in the Use of Focused Ultrasound as a Treatment for Epilepsy

Epilepsy affects about 1% of the population. Approximately one third of patients with epilepsy are drug-resistant (DRE). Resective surgery is an effective treatment for DRE, yet invasive, and not all DRE patients are suitable resective surgery candidates. Focused ultrasound, a novel non-invasive neurointerventional method is currently under investigation as a treatment alternative for DRE. By emitting one or more ultrasound waves, FUS can target structures in the brain at millimeter resolution. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) leads to ablation of tissue and could therefore serve as a non-invasive alternative for resective surgery. It is currently under investigation in clinical trials following the approval of HIFU for essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can modulate neuronal activity and could be used to lower cortical neuronal hyper-excitability in epilepsy patients in a non-invasive manner. The seizure-suppressive effect of LIFU has been studied in several preclinical trials, showing promising results. Further investigations are required to demonstrate translation of preclinical results to human subjects.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has widespread use in research and clinical application. For psychiatric applications, such as depression or OCD, repetitive TMS protocols (rTMS) are an established and globally applied treatment option. While promising, rTMS is not yet as common in treating neurological diseases, except for neurorehabilitation after (motor) stroke and neuropathic pain treatment. This may soon change. New clinical studies testing the potential of rTMS in various other neurological conditions appear at a rapid pace. This can prove challenging for both practitioners and clinical researchers. Although most of these neurological applications have not yet received the same level of scientific/empirical scrutiny as motor stroke and neuropathic pain, the results are encouraging, opening new doors for TMS in neurology. We here review the latest clinical evidence for rTMS in pioneering neurological applications including movement disorders, Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and disorders of consciousness.

Current Status of Neuromodulation-Induced Cortical Prehabilitation and Considerations for Treatment Pathways in Lower-Grade Glioma Surgery

The infiltrative character of supratentorial lower grade glioma makes it possible for eloquent neural pathways to remain within tumoural tissue, which renders complete surgical resection challenging. Neuromodulation-Induced Cortical Prehabilitation (NICP) is intended to reduce the likelihood of premeditated neurologic sequelae that otherwise would have resulted in extensive rehabilitation or permanent injury following surgery. This review aims to conceptualise current approaches involving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS-NICP) and extraoperative Direct Cortical Stimulation (eDCS-NICP) for the purposes of inducing cortical reorganisation prior to surgery, with considerations derived from psychiatric, rehabilitative and electrophysiologic findings related to previous reports of prehabilitation. Despite the promise of reduced risk and incidence of neurologic injury in glioma surgery, the current data indicates a broad but compelling possibility of effective cortical prehabilitation relating to perisylvian cortex, though it remains an under-explored investigational tool. Preliminary findings may prove sufficient for the continued investigation of prehabilitation in small-volume lower-grade tumour or epilepsy patients. However, considering the very low number of peer-reviewed case reports, optimal stimulation parameters and duration of therapy necessary to catalyse functional reorganisation remain equivocal. The non-invasive nature and low risk profile of rTMS-NICP may permit larger sample sizes and control groups until such time that eDCS-NICP protocols can be further elucidated.

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Combined with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Function Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on upper limb motor dysfunction in stroke patients with hemiplegia.

METHODS

A total of 240 stroke patients with hemiplegia who met the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups (60 cases in each group): control group, NMES group, rTMS group, and NMES + rTMS group. Before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment, we evaluated and compared the results including Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE) motor function, modified Barthel index (MBI), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and motor nerve electrophysiological results among the 4 groups.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the scores of FMA-UE, MBI, MAS, and motor nerve electrophysiological indexes among the four groups, with comparability. Compared with those before treatment, the scores of the four groups were significantly increased and improved after treatment. And the score of the NMES + rTMS group was notably higher than those in the other three groups.

CONCLUSION

NMES combined with rTMS can conspicuously improve the upper extremity motor function and activities of daily life of stroke patients with hemiplegia, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Case Report: Prolonged Effects of Short-Term Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on EEG Biomarkers, Spectral Power, and Seizure Frequency

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive modality of focal brain stimulation in which a fluctuating magnetic field induces electrical currents within the cortex. It remains unclear to what extent TMS alters EEG biomarkers and how EEG biomarkers may guide treatment of focal epilepsy. We present a case of a 48-year-old man with focal epilepsy, refractory to multiple medication trials, who experienced a dramatic reduction in seizures after targeting the area of seizure onset within the left parietal-occipital region with low-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS). Prior to treatment, he experienced focal seizures that impacted cognition including apraxia at least 50-60 times daily. MRI of the brain showed a large focal cortical dysplasia with contrast enhancement involving the left occipital-parietal junction. Stimulation for 5 consecutive days was well-tolerated and associated with a day-by-day reduction in seizure frequency. In addition, he was monitored with continuous video EEG, which showed continued and progressive changes in spectral power (decreased broadband power and increased infraslow delta activity) and a gradual reduction in seizure frequency and duration. One month after initial treatment, 2-day ambulatory EEG demonstrated seizure-freedom and MRI showed resolution of focal contrast enhancement. He continues to receive 2-3 days of rTMS every 2-4 months. He was seizure-free for 6 months, and at last follow-up of 17 months was experiencing auras approximately every 2 weeks without progression to disabling seizures. This case demonstrates that rTMS can be a well-tolerated and effective means of controlling medication-refractory seizures, and that EEG biomarkers change gradually in a fashion in association with seizure frequency. TMS influences cortical excitability, is a promising non-invasive means of treating focal epilepsy, and has measurable electrophysiologic effects.

Neuromodulation in Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

SUMMARY

Status epilepticus (SE) is a severe condition that needs immediate pharmacological treatment to tackle brain damage and related side effects. In approximately 20% of cases, the standard treatment for SE does not control seizures, and the condition evolves to refractory SE. If refractory status epilepticus lasts more than 24 hours despite the use of anesthetic treatment, the condition is redefined as super-refractory SE (srSE). sRSE is a destructive condition, potentially to cause severe brain damage. In this review, we discuss the clinical neuromodulation techniques for controlling srSE when conventional treatments have failed: electroconvulsive therapy, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. Data show that neuromodulation therapies can abort srSE in >80% of patients. However, no randomized, prospective, and controlled trials have been completed, and data are provided only by retrospective small case series and case reports with obvious inclination to publication bias. There is a need for further investigation into the use of neuromodulation techniques as an early treatment of srSE and to address whether an earlier intervention can prevent long-term complications.

Headache in people with epilepsy

Epidemiological estimates indicate that individuals with epilepsy are more likely to experience headaches, including migraine, than individuals without epilepsy. Headaches can be temporally unrelated to seizures, or can occur before, during or after an episode; seizures and migraine attacks are mostly not temporally linked. The pathophysiological links between headaches (including migraine) and epilepsy are complex and have not yet been fully elucidated. Correct diagnoses and appropriate treatment of headaches in individuals with epilepsy is essential, as headaches can contribute substantially to disease burden. Here, we review the insights that have been made into the associations between headache and epilepsy over the past 5 years, including information on the pathophysiological mechanisms and genetic variants that link the two disorders. We also discuss the current best practice for the management of headaches co-occurring with epilepsy and highlight future challenges for this area of research.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a highly prevalent neurological condition characterised by repeated unprovoked seizures with various aetiologies. Although antiepileptic medications produce clinical improvement in many individuals, nearly a third of individuals have drug-resistant epilepsy that carries significant morbidity and mortality, and even individuals who have clinical improvement from antiepileptic medications often report iatrogenic symptoms. There remains a need for non-invasive and more effective therapies for this population. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses electromagnetic coils to excite or inhibit neurons, with repetitive pulses at low-frequency producing an inhibitory effect that could conceivably reduce cortical excitability associated with epilepsy. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence for the use of TMS in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy compared with other available treatments in reducing seizure frequency, improving quality of life, reducing epileptiform discharges, antiepileptic medication use, and side effects.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 2 June 2020). CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that were double-blinded, single-blinded, or unblinded, and placebo controlled, no treatment, or active controlled, which used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) without restriction of frequency, coil, duration or intensity on participants with drug-resistant epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted information from each trial including methodological data; participant demographics including baseline seizure frequency, type of epileptic drugs taken; intervention details and intervention groups for comparison; potential biases; and outcomes and time points, primarily change in seizure frequency or responder rates, as well as quality of life and epileptiform discharges, adverse effects, and changes in medication use.

MAIN RESULTS

The original search revealed 274 records from the databases that after selection provided seven full-text relevant studies for inclusion. The latest search identified 179 new records from the databases that after evaluation against the inclusion and exclusion criteria provided one additional full-text relevant study. The eight included studies (241 participants) were all randomised trials; seven of the studies were blinded. Methodological and design information in the included studies was unclear, particularly relating to randomisation and allocation concealment methods. We were not able to combine the results of the trials in analysis due to differences in the studies' designs. For the current update, two of the eight studies analysed showed a statistically significant reduction in seizure rate from baseline (72% and 78.9% reduction of seizures per week from the baseline rate, respectively), whilst the other six studies showed no statistically significant difference in seizure frequency following rTMS treatment compared with controls (low-certainty evidence). One study assessed quality of life and found that more participants showed improvement in quality of life scores with active treatments compared to the sham treatment, but this only involved seven participants (very low-certainty evidence). Four studies evaluated our secondary endpoint of mean number of epileptic discharges, three of which showed a statistically significant reduction in discharges after active rTMS treatment. Adverse effects were uncommon in the studies and typically involved headache, dizziness, and tinnitus; however increased seizure frequency did occur in a small number of individuals. The included trials reported no significant changes in medication use. Overall the risk of bias was either low or unclear, and the certainty of the evidence was low to very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we judged the certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes of this review to be low to very low. We found some evidence to suggest that rTMS is safe but some adverse events were experienced. The variability in technique and outcome reporting prevented meta-analysis, and the evidence for efficacy of rTMS for seizure reduction is still lacking, despite reasonable evidence that it is effective at reducing epileptiform discharges.

Slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

METHODS

One thousand pulses with the intensity of 120% active motor threshold (AMT) at 0.2 Hz frequency were applied on 5 consecutive days in 10 patients with refractory JME. Sham rTMS was performed after 3 months. Electroencephalography (EEG) examinations were performed before rTMS, on the 5th day, and 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after rTMS. Resting motor threshold (RMT), AMT, and cortical silent periods (CSPs) were recorded before the application and at the end of day 5. The changes in the quality of life were evaluated using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31).

RESULTS

No adverse effects were observed. The number of seizures decreased by 29-50%, and interictal discharge durations decreased 2 weeks after the real rTMS. No significant difference was observed between the AMT and RMT values recorded before and after the stimulations. Statistically significant increases in CSP duration and quality of life scores were found following real rTMS. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be considered as a safe treatment option in refractory JME.

CONCLUSION

This study provides some positive evidence that rTMS may be effective in resistant JME.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine combined with escitalopram, and impact on prognostic quality of life in treating patients with epilepsy and depressive disorder

This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine combined with escitalopram in treating patients with epilepsy and depressive disorder, and their influence on the prognostic quality of life. A total of 108 patients with epilepsy and depression were selected as research participants. Among them, 53 patients were treated by oxcarbazepine combined with escitalopram (group A) and 55 patients were treated by lamotrigine combined with escitalopram (group B). Following six-month treatment, efficacy, epilepsy frequency and duration, Hamilton Depression Rating (HAMD) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) scores, adverse reactions, improvement of electroencephalogram (EEG) epileptic discharge, quality of life, 1-year drug retention rate and withdrawal reasons of the two groups were compared. There was no remarkable difference in the total efficacy rate between both groups. The number and duration of epileptic seizures, improvement of EEG epileptic discharge and quality of life in the two groups significantly improved after treatment, with no marked difference. HAMD and MADRS scores of patients from group B were significantly lower after treatment compared with those of patients from group A. The incidence rate of adverse reactions in group B was dramatically lower compared with group A, and the 1-year drug retention rate of group B was dramatically higher compared with that in group A. Both oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine combined with escitalopram exhibited good efficacy in patients with epilepsy and depressive disorder, and they may effectively improve the prognostic quality of life of patients. Lamotrigine combined with escitalopram presented with a better antidepressant effect and safety, with higher patient tolerance.

Non-invasive therapeutic brain stimulation for treatment of resistant focal epilepsy in a teenager

•

rTMS and tDCS could be more often used for treatment-resistant focal epilepsy and tinnitus.

•

tDCS can be used as maintenance treatment after initial successful rTMS treatment.

•

rTMS and tDCS are safe in adolescents when current safety instructions are followed.

Aims

A 13-year-old boy with symptomatic focal epilepsy due to a right parietal dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET) presented pre- and post-operatively fluctuating tinnitus and sensory symptoms which became persistent after incomplete tumor resection. He received low-frequency rTMS treatment and cathodal tDCS treatment.

Methods

Case report with clinical details and pictures from rTMS and tDCS stimulation targets.

Results

The patient became symptom free with an initial low-frequency rTMS treatment series targeted to the EEG-verified epileptic zone followed by maintenance therapy at the same region with cathodal tDCS at home.

Conclusions

Both rTMS and tDCS could be more often used in adolescents when drug treatment and surgery do not cease focal epilepsy, here with fluctuating tinnitus.

Transcranial photobiomodulation attenuates pentylenetetrazole-induced status epilepticus in peripubertal rats

Convulsive status epilepticus is the most common neurological emergency in children. Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) reverses elevated rodent neurotransmitters after status epilepticus (SE) yet whether tPBM can attenuate seizure behaviors remains unknown. Here, we applied near-infrared laser at wavelength 808 nm transcranially to peripubertal Sprague-Dawley rats prior to pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) injection. Hematoxylin-eosin, immunofluorescence (IF) staining with anti-parvalbumin (PV) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay after IF staining was performed. Behaviorally, tPBM attenuated the mean seizure score and reduced the incidence of SE and mortality. Histochemically, tPBM reduced dark neurons in the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus and hypothalamus, lessened the apoptotic ratio of parvalbumin-positive interneurons (PV-INs) and alleviated the aberrant extent of PV-positive unstained somata of PCs in the hippocampus. Conclusively, tPBM attenuated PTZ-induced seizures, SE and mortality in peripubertal rats and reduced PTZ-induced neuronal injury, apoptosis of PV-INs and preserved PV positive perisomatic inhibitory network in the hippocampus.

Cortical excitability in epilepsy and the impact of antiepileptic drugs: transcranial magnetic stimulation applications

INTRODUCTION

Epileptic conditions are characterized by impaired cortical excitation/inhibition balance and interneuronal disinhibition. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a neurophysiological method that assesses brain excitation/inhibition.

AREA COVERED

This review was written after a detailed search in PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of science, SciELO, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases from 1990 to 2020. It summarizes TMS applications for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in epilepsy. TMS studies help to distinguish different epilepsy conditions and explore the antiepileptic drugs' (AEDs') effects on neuronal microcircuits and plasticity mechanisms. Repetitive TMS studies showed that low-frequency rTMS (0.33-1 Hz) can reduce seizures' frequency in refractory epilepsy or pause ongoing seizures; however, there is no current approval for its use in such patients as adjunctive treatment to AEDs.

EXPERT OPINION

There are variable and conflicting TMS results which reflect the distinct pathogenic mechanisms of each epilepsy condition, the dynamic epileptogenic process over the long disease course resulting in the development of recurrent spontaneous seizures and/or progression of epilepsy after it is established, and the differential effect of AEDs on cortical excitability. Future epilepsy research should focus on combined TMS/functional connectivity studies that explore the complex cortical excitability circuits and networks using different TMS parameters and techniques.

Electromagnetic activity: a possible player in epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common disease with frequent occurrences. Many precipitating factors contribute to epileptic seizures, such as hyperventilation and alcohol consumption. An increasing number of studies have also found that electromagnetic activity in the environment can also affect epileptic seizures. However, many neuromodulatory devices that produce electromagnetic fields have been applied in the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy. In this paper, we performed literature search in the PubMed, Medline and EMBASE databases and reviewed retrospective, prospective, or cross-sectional studies and case reports on the effects of electromagnetic activity on epilepsy. The application of electromagnetic activity in the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy is also reviewed.

Non-pharmacological Interventions for Intractable Epilepsy

In 30% of epileptic individuals, intractable epilepsy represents a problem for the management of seizures and severely affects the patient's quality of life due to pharmacoresistance with commonly used antiseizure drugs (ASDs). Surgery is not the best option for all resistant patients due to its post-surgical consequences. Therefore, several alternative or complementary therapies have scientifically proven significant therapeutic potential for the management of seizures in intractable epilepsy patients with seizure-free occurrences. Various non-pharmacological interventions include metabolic therapy, brain stimulation therapy, and complementary therapy. Metabolic therapy works out by altering the energy metabolites and include the ketogenic diets (KD) (that is restricted in carbohydrates and mimics the metabolic state of the body as produced during fasting and exerts its antiepileptic effect) and anaplerotic diet (which revives the level of TCA cycle intermediates and this is responsible for its effect). Neuromodulation therapy includes vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation therapy (RNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (TMS). Complementary therapies such as biofeedback and music therapy have demonstrated promising results in pharmacoresistant epilepsies. The current emphasis of the review article is to explore the different integrated mechanisms of various treatments for adequate seizure control, and their limitations, and supportive pieces of evidence that show the efficacy and tolerability of these non-pharmacological options.

Long-term intermittent low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effectively controls seizures in two drug-free adolescent patients

Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely used for treating neurological and psychiatric diseases. Low-frequency rTMS is used to effectively control the occurrence of seizures, including medication-refractory epilepsy and cortical dysplasia or neocortical epilepsy. However, there have been no reports on the effects of long-term rTMS on epilepsy. We observed the clinical effects of long-term rTMS in two drug-free adolescent epileptic patients with a preference for non-drug therapy. The two drug-free adolescent patients, who underwent intermittent low-frequency rTMS treatment for 36 weeks, obtained effective control of seizures (including episode and severity). However, a systematic study is required to confirm our observations.

Neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation for seizure suppression: From electrode to magnetic coil

Non-invasive brain tissue stimulation with a magnetic coil provides several irreplaceable advantages over that with an implanted electrode, in altering neural activities under pathological situations. We reviewed clinical cases that utilized time-varying magnetic fields for the treatment of epilepsy, and the safety issues related to this practice. Animal models have been developed to foster understanding of the cellular/molecular mechanisms underlying magnetic control of epileptic activity. These mechanisms include (but are not limited to) (1) direct membrane polarization by the magnetic field, (2) depolarization blockade by the deactivation of ion channels, (3) alteration in synaptic transmission, and (4) interruption of ephaptic interaction and cellular synchronization. Clinical translation of this technology could be improved through the advancement of magnetic design, optimization of stimulation protocols, and evaluation of the long-term safety. Cellular and molecular studies focusing on the mechanisms of magnetic stimulation are of great value in facilitating this translation.

Characteristics of Seizure and Antiepileptic Drug Utilization in Outpatients With Autoimmune Encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is one kind of encephalitis that associates with specific neuronal antigens. Most patients with AE likely suffer from seizures, but data on the characteristics of seizure and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) utilization in this patient group remains limited. This study aimed to report the clinical status of seizure and AEDs treatment of patients with AE, and to evaluate the relationship between AEDs discontinuation and seizure outcomes. Patients with acute neurological disorders and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA_BR), leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1, or contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies were included. As patients withdrew from AEDs, they were divided into the early withdrawal (EW, AEDs used ≤3 months) and late withdrawal (LW, AEDs used >3 months) groups. Seizure remission was defined as having no seizures for at least 1 year after the last time when AEDs were administered. Seizure outcomes were assessed on the basis of remission rate. The factors affecting the outcomes were assessed through Spearman analysis. In total, we enrolled 75 patients (39 patients aged <16 years, male/female = 39/36) for follow-up, which included 67 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 4 patients with anti-GABA_BR encephalitis, 2 patients with anti-voltage-gated potassium channel encephalitis, and 2 patients with coexisting antibodies. Among the 34 enrolled patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who were withdrawn from AEDs, only 5.8% relapse was reported during the 1-year follow-up, with no significant difference in the percentage of relapse between the EW and LW groups (P = 0.313). Fifteen patients (an average age of 6.8, 14 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and 1 patient with anti-CASPR2 encephalitis) presented seizure remission without any AEDs. Seventy five percent of patients with anti-GABA_BR antibodies developed refractory seizure. Other risk factors which contributed to refractory seizure and seizure relapse included status epilepticus (P = 0.004) and cortical abnormalities (P = 0.028). Given this retrospective data, patients with AE have a high rate of seizure remission, and the long-term use of AEDs may not be necessary to control the seizure. Moreover, seizures in young patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis presents self-limited. Patients with anti-GABA_BR antibody, status epilepticus, and cortical abnormalities are more likely to develop refractory seizure or seizure relapse.

A systematic review on the therapeutic effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of anxiety disorders

The interest in the use of non-invasive brain stimulation for enhancing neural functions and reducing symptoms in anxiety disorders is growing. Based on the DSM-V classification for anxiety disorders, we examined all available research using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of specific phobias, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. A systematic literature search conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar databases provided 26 results: 12 sham-controlled studies and 15 not sham-controlled studies. With regard to the latter sub-group of studies, 9 were case reports, and 6 open label studies. Overall, our work provides preliminary evidence that both, excitatory stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex and inhibitory stimulation of the right prefrontal cortex can reduce symptom severity in anxiety disorders. The current results are discussed in the light of a model for the treatment for anxiety disorders via non-invasive brain stimulation, which is based on up-/downregulation mechanisms and might serve as guide for future systematic investigations in the field.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Option for Neurologic and Psychiatric Illnesses

In recent years, transcranial magnetic stimulation has become an area of interest in the field of neurosciences due to its ability to non-invasively induce sufficient electric current to depolarize superficial axons and networks in the cortex and can be used to explore brain functioning. Evidence shows that transcranial magnetic stimulation could be used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for various neurological and psychiatric illnesses. The aim of this review is to introduce the basics of this technology to the readers and to bring together an overview of some of its clinical applications investigated thus far.