MDM4 amplification in atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcoma: Private event or alternative oncogenic mechanism?

A national survey of the current management of nonmalignant lipomatous tumours and a proposal for unified UK guidelines for practice

Although there exists clear guidance to determine which lipomatous lesions should be referred to a sarcoma multidisciplinary team (MDT) for discussion, subsequent guidelines for management advice are only focused on malignant lesions. This study aimed to address the management of benign and intermediate lipomatous lesions with reference to the available literature, precedent from 15 of the 17 UK sarcoma MDTs, and local experience. Fifteen mock cases were presented to each MDT to determine local management pathways. This revealed significant heterogeneity within the management of these benign and intermediate lipomatous lesions across the UK. After combining this data with the available evidence in the literature, we developed recommendations for management of these lesions with the aim to reduce national variability. We propose the first set of national management guidelines specific to benign lipomatous lesions, which stratifies resources according to lipomatous tumour type.

Myxoid Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 25 Cases of a Distinctive Sarcoma With Deceptively Bland Morphology and Aggressive Clinical Behavior

The number of recognized sarcoma types harboring targetable molecular alterations continues to increase. Here we present 25 examples of a distinctive myofibroblastic tumor, provisionally termed "myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma," which might be related to inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and which occurred in 13 males (52%) and 12 females at a median age of 37 years (range: 7 to 79 years). Primary tumor sites were peritoneum (18 patients; 72%), paratesticular (2; 8%), chest wall (1), upper extremity (1), esophagus (1), retroperitoneum (1), and uterus (1). Nine peritoneal tumors (50%) were multifocal at presentation; all other tumors were unifocal. Tumors showed bland-to-mildly-atypical neoplastic myofibroblasts in a myxoid stroma, with prominent inflammatory infiltrates in 22 cases (88%). Most tumors showed delicate branching stromal vessels like those of myxoid liposarcoma, and most showed infiltrative growth through non-neoplastic tissue. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated expression of SMA (19/25 tumors; 76%), desmin (13/22; 59%), and CD30 (5/11; 45%), while ALK was expressed in 1 tumor (of 25; 4%) that was negative for ALK rearrangement. Sequencing of 11 tumors showed seven to harbor tyrosine kinase fusions (4 PDGFRB , 2 PML :: JAK1 , 1 SEC31A :: PDGFRA ). Two instead harbored hot spot KRAS mutations (G12V and Q61H), and 2 were negative for known driving alterations. Clinical follow-up was available for 18 patients (72%; median: 2.7 years; range: 4 mo-12.3 years). Nine patients (50%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 5 (28%) died of disease, and 4 (22%) were alive with disease. Seven patients (39%) experienced peritoneal relapse or distant metastasis. Two patients showed disease progression on conventional, nontargeted chemotherapy. The patient whose tumor harbored SEC31A :: PDGFRA was treated after multiple relapses with imatinib and sunitinib therapy, with progression-free periods of 5 and 2 years, respectively. Despite its bland appearance, myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma harbors a significant risk for disseminated disease, particularly when it occurs in the peritoneum. Targeted therapy could be considered for patients with disseminated disease.

Update on immunohistochemistry in bone and soft tissue tumors: Cost-effectively replacing molecular testing with immunohistochemistry

Soft tissue tumors form part of a challenging domain in diagnostic pathology owing to their comparative rarity, astonishing histologic diversity, and overlap between entities. Many of these tumors are now known to be defined by highly recurrent, or, in some instances, unique molecular alterations. Insights from gene profiling continue to elucidate the wider molecular landscape of soft tissue tumors; many of these advances have been co-opted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnostic applications. There now exists a multitude of antibodies serving as surrogate markers of recurrent gene fusions, amplifications, and point mutations, which, in certain settings, can replace the need for more resource and time-intensive cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. IHC presents many advantages including rapid turnaround time, cost-effectiveness, and interpretative reproducibility. A sensible application of these immunohistochemical markers complemented by a working knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of bone and soft tissue tumors permits accurate diagnosis in the majority of cases. In this review, we will outline some of these biomarkers while emphasizing molecular correlates and highlighting interpretative challenges and pitfalls.

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and related mimics with updates. When is molecular testing most cost-effective, necessary, and indicated?

The classification and work-up of adipocytic neoplasms remains challenging and sometimes controversial. Since its initial description by Dr. Enterline, the variety of subtypes and morphological appearances considered to represent the spectrum of atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) has expanded, resulting in significant morphologic overlap with other entities, including the recently described atypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumor (ASPLT), conventional spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma (SPL), and so-called "low-grade" forms of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DL). Nevertheless, the distinction of most examples of ALT/WDL from lipomas/lipoma-like lesions is easily performed on routine histologic examination but can be problematic if the characteristic atypical cells are poorly represented, particularly in small biopsy specimens, obscured by other cellular elements (inflammation), or simply not recognized. The discovery that lipomatous tumors harbor specific and unique karyotypes and molecular events has resulted in ancillary tests that can help provide more accurate diagnoses, especially in less-than-optimal scenarios. Confirmation of MDM2 immunohistochemical over-expression and detection of the MDM2 gene rearrangement via fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) have proven particularly reliable and useful. While FISH analysis for MDM2 gene amplification may be helpful for confirming (or excluding) ALT/WDL, it also can lead to overutilization and overdependence. Furthermore, a small subset of otherwise typical ALT/WDL lack MDM2 gene amplification, employing alternative molecular pathways. The recent recognition of ASPLT has introduced a tumor easily mistaken morphologically for ALT/WDL, often exhibiting bizarre and pleomorphic lipoblasts, but lacking the underlying molecular abnormalities and subsequent risk of dedifferentiation. ASPLT also have overlapping features with the better-established SPL but with a greater tendency to locally recur and more frequent involvement of the distal extremities. The precise criteria separating cellular forms of ALT from what some consider "low grade" forms of DL remains controversial and inconsistently applied, even among individual pathologists within institutions. Given their underlying shared cytogenetic abnormality, molecular testing has no utility in this distinction. Herein is a comprehensive historical overview of ALT/WDL, with updates on its distinction from other similar lipomatous tumors and DL, including practical evidence-based criteria for the appropriate cost-effective use of MDM2 testing.

Keeping it real: Merging traditional and contemporary practices in musculoskeletal pathology: A special issue of neoplastic and non-neoplastic bone and soft tissue pathology

There is no shortage of comprehensive review articles on bone and soft tissue pathology, almost always representing a regurgitation of the literature with little to no guidance on personal "best practices," recommended applications of ancillary testing, and alternative points of view. This special issue of Human Pathology uniquely unites evidence-based medicine, where appropriate, with the collective personal experiences of a wide range of accomplished pathologists from varying institutions and backgrounds, addressing problematic areas, updated and sometimes imperfect classification systems, and their personal preferences for cost-effectively incorporating ancillary testing. For the preponderance of general pathologists (and specialists), whether academic or non-academic, non-neoplastic musculoskeletal diseases represent a far higher percentage of their practice than bone and soft tissue neoplasia. One of the most common frozen sections performed at many hospitals throughout the USA is revision arthroplasty, relying on the pathologist to help determine the presence (or absence) of periprosthetic joint infection, largely based on the hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) slide. Not every institution has access to the latest molecular techniques; fortunately, many of the current immunohistochemical antibodies serve as reliable surrogate markers of genetic mutations, allowing for cheaper but accurate diagnoses, when deemed necessary. Furthermore, molecular testing is often not necessary to establish a specific diagnosis, even among neoplasms with known underlying genetic abnormalities. It must be remembered that most bone and soft tissue tumors were recognized and classified correctly, before we uncovered and understood, among a subset, their underlying and unique molecular aberrations. Perhaps not surprisingly, in some cases, more than one molecular pathway may lead to the same histologic tumor subtype. Less commonly, an identical genetic driver/fusion may result in immunophenotypically and biologically distinct neoplasms, sometimes with entirely different clinical behaviors. "Dedifferentiation," a concept recognized among a variety of bone and soft tissue neoplasms, including but not limited to chondrosarcoma, parosteal osteosarcoma, and liposarcoma, needs to be objectively reassessed, particularly for liposarcoma. The following reviews attempt to address the above concepts, re-emphasizing the important role the practicing pathologist continues to (and must) play in the differential diagnoses of neoplastic and non-neoplastic musculoskeletal diseases.

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of percutaneous core needle biopsy of retroperitoneal tumours

BACKGROUND

Histologic subtype of cancer guides treatment sequencing and the extent of surgery for retroperitoneal tumours (RPTs) but concerns persist regarding percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB).

OBJECTIVE

Endpoints were the incidence of early complications, needle tract seeding (NTS) after CNB, diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2022, data from patients with RPT who underwent a CNB and who operated on at Institut Curie were collected. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and microscopic analysis of both CNB and surgical specimens to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CNB (quantified using positive and negative predictive values, PPV/NPV).

RESULTS

313 patients underwent CNB. In 10/326 (3 %) procedures, minor complications were observed. One of 212 (0.47 %) resected RPSs exhibited a local recurrence compatible with NTS. Microscopic analysis of CNB specimens allowed the classification of tumours between groups of cancers and benign/intermediate mesenchymal tumours in 307/313 (98 %) patients. Among the 204 patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma, the overall concordance between CNB and final pathology following resection was 178/204 (87.2 %). The respective PPVs of solitary fibrous tumour, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma were 100 %, 98 %, 97 % and 68 %, respectively. The diagnosis of a high-grade (G 2-3) sarcoma resulted in a high specificity (97 %) and PPV (98 %) but low sensitivity (76 %).

CONCLUSIONS

CNB allowed the classification of RPT in the vast majority of patients with a low morbidity rate. Concordance with final diagnosis was high for sarcomas with the exception of well-differentiated liposarcoma. As a result, CNB results should be integrated with imaging/radiomics by multidisciplinary tumour boards.