Downstaging of hepatocellular cancer before liver transplant: long-term outcome compared to tumors within Milan criteria

Role of Liver Transplant in Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma are the primary hepatic malignancies with established pathways to transplantation and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception points. Other tumors managed with liver transplantation (LT) include hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and fibrolamellar HCC. LT for metastatic neuroendocrine tumor has been established with patient selection criteria and a path to MELD exception points. Additionally, recent data on LT for patients with unresectable hepatic colorectal metastases demonstrate increasingly encouraging initial results.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Role of Liver Transplantation: An Update and Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Multiple treatment modalities are available for the management of HCC, depending on its stage as determined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. Because liver transplantation (LT) theoretically removes the cancer and replaces the organ at risk for future malignancy, LT is often considered the most definitive and one of the most efficacious treatment options for HCC. Nevertheless, the success and efficacy of liver transplantation depend on various tumor characteristics. As a result, multiple criteria have been developed to assess the appropriateness of a case of HCC for LT, with the pioneering Milan Criteria established in 1996. Over the past 20 to 30 years, these criteria have been critically evaluated, expanded, and often liberalized to make LT for patients with HCC a more universally applicable option. Furthermore, the development of other treatment modalities has enabled downstaging and bridging strategies for HCC prior to LT. In this narrative and comprehensive review, we provided an update on recent trends in the epidemiology of HCC, selection criteria for LT, implementation of LT across different regions, treatment modalities available as bridges, downstaging strategies, alternatives to LT, and, finally, post-LT surveillance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy

The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.

Consensus of Chinese Experts on Neoadjuvant and Conversion Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy in China, with high recurrence rate and low resection rate among patients first diagnosed. Preoperative treatments including neoadjuvant and conversion therapy have the potential to overcome these challenges. In December 2021, Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma was published. With the emersion of new evidence regarding the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for HCC, the cooperative group brought together multidisciplinary researchers and scholars with experience in related fields to update the new edition (2023 Edition) for reference in China, including principle of the treatment strategies, the potential populations selection, treatment methods, multidisciplinary team, and future research for preoperative treatments. The new consensus aims to provide guidance for clinical application. Through the use of neoadjuvant therapy and conversion therapy, we can enhance the resection rate and reduce the recurrence of intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients, thereby improving survival outcomes.

Neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma-priming precision innovations to transform HCC treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in prevalence globally, and cure remains limited with non-operative treatment. Surgical intervention, through resection or transplantation, offers a potential for cure for select patients. However, many patients present with advanced or unresectable disease, and recurrence rates remain high. Recent advances in systemic therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have demonstrated promise in treating unresectable HCC and as adjuvant therapy. Evidence from adjuvant trials highlights the synergistic potential of combined liver-directed and systemic therapies. These findings have ignited growing interest in neoadjuvant therapy across various scenarios: (1) as a bridging strategy while awaiting transplantation, (2) for downstaging disease to enable transplantation, (3) for converting unresectable disease to a resectable state, or (4) as neoadjuvant treatment in operable cases. Early-stage trials of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable HCC have reported promising outcomes. To realize the potential of neoadjuvant treatment for HCC, thoughtfully designed, adequately powered, multi-center clinical trials are essential.

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Oleuropein in a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Hepatocellular Tumor Sphere Model

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to examine the dose-related effects over time of oleuropein on the proliferation and area of tumor spheroids in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the possible effects of 100 to 500 μM dose concentrations of oleuropein on HepG2 cell proliferation using a real-time cell analyzer. A 3-dimensional hepatocellular carcinoma tumor spheroid model was established by seeding HepG2 cells at a density of 160 cells/well in custom 96-well microplates with low attachment surfaces and culturing for 3 days. Tumor spheres were treated with increasing oleuropein doses for 72 hours, and images were captured every 24 hours. The dose-dependent effects of oleuropein on tumor sphere size were analyzed by measuring the area of tumor spheres with ImageJ software. We conducted oleuropein viability and cytotoxicity analyses using calcein acetoxymethyl ester-based and propidium iodide-based staining in the tumor model.

RESULTS

Oleuropein inhibited cell proliferation; as the dose concentration of oleuropein increased, so did its capacity to inhibit cell proliferation (P < .001). The size of untreated tumor spheres increased at 72 hours (P < .001). However, treatment with 100 to 500 μM oleuropein reduced tumor size by 63.56% to 88.06% compared with untreated cells at the end of 72 hours (P < .001). With increasing concentrations, oleuropein inhibited the viability of tumor spheres, eliminating necrotic death caused by tumor hypoxia.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, oleuropein reduced the size of tumors by inhibiting tumor proliferation and viability. In this context, oleuropein could be a candidate molecule for further extensive studies to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma tumors to meet Milan criteria for liver transplant.

Evolving Indications for Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following the Milan Criteria

Background/Objectives: Since their introduction in the 1990s, the Milan criteria have been the gold standard of indication for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, several institutions have reported wider indication criteria for LT with comparable survival outcomes. Methods: This paper summarizes the recent indications for LT for HCC through a literature review. Results: There are several criteria expanding the Milan criteria, which can be subdivided into the "based on tumor number and size only", "based on tumor number and size plus tumor markers", and "based on tumor differentiation" groups, with the outcomes being comparable to those of patients included within the Milan criteria. Besides the tumor size and number, which are included in the Milan criteria, recent criteria included biomarkers and tumor differentiation. Several retrospective studies have reported microvascular invasion (MVI) as a significant risk factor for postoperative recurrence, highlighting the importance of preoperatively predicting MVI. Several studies attempted to identify preoperative predictive factors for MVI using tumor markers or preoperative imaging findings. Patients with HCC who are LT candidates are often treated while on the waiting list to prevent the progression of HCC or to reduce the measurable disease burden of HCC. The expanding repertoire of chemotherapeutic regiments suitable for patients with HCC should be further investigated. Conclusions: There are several criteria expanding Milan criteria, with the outcomes being comparable to those of patients included within the Milan criteria.

Criteria and prognostic models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated death globally. Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a key treatment for patients with HCC, and the Milan criteria have been adopted as the cornerstone of the selection policy. To allow more patients to benefit from LT, a number of expanded criteria have been proposed, many of which use radiologic morphological characteristics with larger and more tumors as surrogates to predict outcomes. Other groups developed indices incorporating biological variables and dynamic markers of response to locoregional treatment. These expanded selection criteria achieved satisfactory results with limited liver supplies. In addition, a number of prognostic models have been developed using clinicopathological characteristics, imaging radiomics features, genetic data, and advanced techniques such as artificial intelligence. These models could improve prognostic estimation, establish surveillance strategies, and bolster long-term outcomes in patients with HCC. In this study, we reviewed the latest findings and achievements regarding the selection criteria and post-transplant prognostic models for LT in patients with HCC.

CT perfusion and MRI: A combined approach for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and follow-up after locoregional treatment

OBJECTIVE

CT liver perfusion (CTLP) has been well validated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection, characterization, and treatment response evaluation. However, its role in HCC management algorithms remains unclear. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of CTLP alone or as an adjunct to MRI in patients considered for- or undergoing locoregional treatment for HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients under HCC surveillance (36 male, 31 cirrhotic, 16 pretreatment, 19 post-transarterial chemoembolization, 2 post-ablation) underwent MRI and CTLP in a single center within a 45-day interval. Two readers identified and characterized all observations on MRI using Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 criteria. CTLP assessment was based on Mean Slope of Increase (MSI), Time To Peak (TTP), Hepatic arterial Blood Flow (HaBF) and Hepatic Arterial Fraction (HAF) maps and established cut-offs. Diagnostic performance of MRI, CTLP, and their combination was evaluated for treated and untreated lesions using imaging or pathology as reference standard.

RESULTS

Of the total 33 treated and 61 untreated lesions, 13 and 41 were considered viable HCCs. CTLP demonstrated 75.9 % sensitivity and 95 % specificity compared to 72.2 % and 100 % for MRI (p > 0.05). Combining both modalities increased sensitivity to 85.2 % (p < 0.05) and maintained specificity at 97.5 % (p > 0.05). The combined approach led to an LR category change in 5 treated and 19 untreated lesions and affected management in 5 cases.

CONCLUSION

CTLP and MRI have comparable diagnostic performance for HCC. A combined approach improves sensitivity, without sacrificing specificity. This approach might enable more efficient patient selection for early and individualized loco-regional treatment.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

The Role of Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard-of-care for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current selection criteria depend primarily on measures of tumor burden and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Evolving strategies include the application of prognostic scores and the development of specialized molecular markers to predict recurrence. New technologies such as machine perfusion of donor organs are expected to dramatically improve the availability and access to LT in HCC.

Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: Results from a national multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with HCC meeting United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)-downstaging (DS) criteria have excellent post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. Studies on HCC beyond UNOS-DS criteria ("All-Comers" [AC]) have been limited by small sample size and short follow-up time, prompting this analysis.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six patients meeting UNOS-DS and 190 meeting AC criteria from 9 LT centers across 5 UNOS regions were enrolled from 2015 to 2023 and prospectively followed. Competing risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate DS and LT outcomes, and Fine-and-Gray and Cox models were used to identify predictors of outcomes. AC and UNOS-DS had similar median alpha-fetoprotein (15 vs. 12 ng/mL; p =0.08), MELD (9 vs. 9; p =0.52), and Child-Pugh (A vs. A; p =0.30). Two years after the first local regional therapy, 82% of UNOS-DS and 66% of AC were successfully downstaged ( p <0.001). In AC, DS rates were 72% for tumor number plus diameter of largest lesion <10, 51% for sum 10-12, and 39% for sum >12 ( p =0.01). Yttrium-90 achieved higher DS success than transarterial chemoembolization in AC (74% vs. 65%; p <0.001). 48% of UNOS-DS and 40% of AC underwent LT ( p =0.10). Five-year post-LT survival was similar between UNOS-DS and AC (74% vs. 72%; p =0.77), although 5-year post-LT recurrence was higher in AC (30% vs. 14%; p =0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher HCC recurrence and lower intention-to-treat survival in AC, post-LT survival was comparable between UNOS-DS and AC. Yttrium-90 attained higher DS success than transarterial chemoembolization in AC. LT after DS is feasible in AC, though defining an upper limit in tumor burden may be necessary.

Disadvantage of Viable Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis in Liver Transplantation for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is a promising treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comorbid with cirrhosis. However, HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains an absolute contraindication for LT. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of LT in patients with HCC plus portal vein thrombosis and further evaluate the impact of PVTT on the long-term outcomes of patients.

METHODS

Among the 501 patients who underwent LT for HCC between January 2000 and March 2023, 29 (5.8%) patients with HCC who had portal vein thrombosis were further analyzed. Of these 29 patients with portal vein thrombosis, 12 (41.4%) were preoperatively diagnosed with PVTT and underwent LT after receiving downstaging therapy. The remaining 17 (58.6%) patients were PVTT-free prior to LT.

RESULTS

Overall, the recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96.3%, 74.2%, and 74.2%, respectively, while the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 82.4%, 74.2%, and 70.1%, respectively. However, patients with viable PVTT had significantly worse outcomes than those without viable PVTT (p = 0.030). The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates for patients with viable PVTT were 57.5% and 57.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LT may still be a promising option for patients with HCC and PVTT after appropriate downstaging. However, caution should be adopted, as remnant viable PVTT might lead to unsatisfactory outcomes after transplantation.

The assessment of impaired liver function and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The impairment of liver function strongly limits the therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the assessment of liver function is key to finding the appropriate therapy for patients suffering from this disease. Furthermore, preexisting liver dysfunction has a negative impact on the prognosis of patients in addition to the malignant potential of HCC. Hence, defining the optimal treatment of patients with HCC requires a comprehensive examination with liver function being a crucial part of it.

AREAS COVERED

This review will provide an overview of the currently existing methods for evaluating the liver function in patients with HCC. Assessment of liver function includes scoring systems but also functional and technical methods. In addition, the role of these tests in different treatment facilities such as liver resection, transplantation, interventional and systemic therapy is summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

A comprehensive pretherapeutic assessment of the liver function includes laboratory-based scoring systems, as well as imaging- and non-imaging-based functional tests. Combining diverse parameters can help to improve the safety and efficacy of HCC therapy particularly in patients with compromised liver function. Future research should focus on optimizing pretherapeutic assessment recommendations for each therapy.

Hepatic Resection as the Primary Treatment Method for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and certain malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the surgical management of de novo or recurrent tumors that develop in the transplanted allograft are limited. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for de novo or recurrent tumors after liver transplantation.

METHODS

The study enrolled adult and pediatric patients from 12 centers across North America who underwent hepatic resection for the treatment of a solid tumor after LT. Perioperative outcomes were assessed as well as recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for those undergoing resection for HCC.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2023, 54 patients underwent hepatic resection of solid tumors after LT. For 50 patients (92.6 %), resection of malignant lesions was performed. The most common lesion was HCC (n = 35, 64.8 %), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6, 11.1 %) and colorectal liver metastases (n = 6, 11.1 %). The majority of the 35 patients underwent resection of HCC did not receive any preoperative therapy (82.9 %) or adjuvant therapy (71.4 %), with resection their only treatment method for HCC. During a median follow-up period of 50.7 months, the median RFS was 21.5 months, and the median OS was 49.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic resection following OLT is safe and associated with morbidity and mortality rates that are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing resection in native livers. Hepatic resection as the primary and often only treatment modality for HCC following LT is associated with acceptable RFS and OS and should be considered in well selected patients.

Pretransplant immunotherapy increases acute rejection yet improves survival outcome of HCC patients with MVI post-liver transplantation

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy has emerged as the most promising strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) downstaging prior to liver transplantation (LT). However, further evidence is required to assess the feasibility and safety of pretransplant ICI exposure. We retrospective analyzed 159 HCC patients who underwent LT at our institution from June 2019 to December 2023, and 39 recipients (39/159, 24.5%) received pretransplant ICI therapy. The perioperative acute rejection rate and rejection-related mortality rate in the ICI group were 23.1% (9/39) and 12.8% (5/39), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the non-ICI group, at 5% (6/120, P = 0.002) and 0% (0/120, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 90-day post-transplant overall survival (OS) (P = 0.447) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.723) between these two groups. We found 37.1% (59/159) recipients were found to have microvascular invasion (MVI), no matter whether the HCC tumor is within Milan criteria or not. Notably, though MVI was identified as a risk factor for the LT recipients, pretransplant ICI exposure appeared to be a protective factor for HCC patients with MVI which benefits its overall survival. Besides, the RFS and OS in the ICI exposure recipients with MVI were comparable to the non-ICI exposure recipients without MVI. However, no synergistic anti-tumor effects were observed with pretransplant ICI immunotherapy when combined with locoregional of TACE, HAIC, RFA and systematic of lenvatinib or sorafenib downstaging treatments, nor with post-transplant adjuvant of systematic or FOLFOX chemotherapy. Further comprehensive studies are needed to balance the dual natural effects of immunotherapy by optimizing downstaging protocols and patient selection to reduce acute rejection and improve long-term survival.

Recurrence risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective method for curing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However postoperative tumor recurrence can lead to higher mortality rates. To select suitable candidates for LT, the Milan Criteria (MC) were first proposed based on tumor morphological characteristics. For those patients who meet the MC, the MC can effectively reduce the postoperative tumor recurrence rate and improve the prognosis of patients undergoing LT. It has always been internationally recognized as the gold standard for selecting candidates for LT, marking a milestone in the history of LT for HCC. However, its strict conditions exclude some HCC patients who could benefit from LT. Therefore, comprehension consideration criteria, including serum biomarkers, tumor histology, and other factor, have been continuously proposed in addition to tumor morphology. This article summaries the prediction model for HCC recurrence after LT from five aspects: tumor morphology, serum markers, histopathology, cellular inflammatory factors and downstaging treatment before transplantation. The aim is to assist clinicians in accurately assessing HCC status, selecting appropriate liver transplant candidates, maximize graft and patients' survival, and optimizing the utilization of social health resources.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Pre-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Setting: A Glimpse Beyond the Liver

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for most patients with non-metastatic HCC. In recent years, the management of patients with HCC has considerably changed, thanks to the improvement of molecular biology knowledge and the introduction of immunotherapy. To date, systemic therapy is authorized in the Western world only in patients with advanced HCC. However, this therapy could not only stabilize the tumour disease or improve survival but could display excellent response and lead to downstaging of the tumour that finally permits LT. There are increasing reports of patients that have performed LT after pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, due to the intrinsic mechanism of ICIs, graft rejection might be favoured. In addition, chronic adverse effects affecting other organs may also appear after the end of therapy. This review aims to evaluate the readiness and outcomes of LT in patients with advanced HCC who have previously undergone treatment with ICIs. It seeks to identify the challenges, risks, and benefits associated with this conversion therapy. The integration of ICIs into the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC necessitates a nuanced approach to LT. While early evidence supports the feasibility of LT following ICIs therapy, there is an urgent need for standardized guidelines and more extensive longitudinal studies to optimize patient selection, timing, and post-transplant management.

Results of hepatocellular carcinoma downstaging through hepatic transarterial chemoembolization in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Liver transplantation plays an important role in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, diagnosis often occurs when the tumor size exceeds Milan criteria. In this context, locoregional treatments are frequently indicated. The aim of this study is to evaluate cirrhotic patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for downstaging.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed medical records of patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with HCC, who underwent TACE with the aim of downstaging. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method was used. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-three patients were evaluated, of which 44.7% underwent liver transplantation after downstaging. Mortality in these patients was 32.7% and the probability of survival at 1, 2, and 5 years after liver transplantation was, respectively, 80%, 70.8%, and 57%. When comparing with the unsuccessful group, there was a significant difference regarding number of nodules, size of the largest nodule, and response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor. The characteristics of the group undergoing TACE for downstaging and the group undergoing TACE as a bridge to transplantation were also compared, and patients were selected through the propensity score. A more significant number of nodules was observed in patients who underwent downstaging (P = 0.014) and they exceeded Milan criteria in the explanted liver more frequently (P = 0.007). Survival in the downstaging group and in the bridge group was not different (P = 0.342).

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation in patients with HCC after successful downstaging proved to be effective, as patients had adequate survival.

Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: The next evolution in expanding access to liver transplantation

Immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition, several phase III trials of immunotherapy in combination with surgical or locoregional therapies for early-to intermediate-stage HCC have recently reported positive results, and other phase III trials in the same patient population are currently in progress. As the application of immunotherapy is shifting to include patients with earlier stages of HCC, one looming question now emerges: What is the role of immunotherapy in the pre-liver transplant population? Liver transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for HCC and confers the additional advantage of restoring a normal, healthy liver. In pre-transplant patients, immunotherapy may improve downstaging success and tumour control at the cost of some immunologic risks. These include immune-related toxicities, which are particularly relevant in a uniquely vulnerable population with chronic liver disease, and the possibility of acute rejection after transplantation. Ultimately, the goal of immunotherapy in this population will be to effectively expand access to liver transplantation while preserving pre- and post-transplant outcomes. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms supporting combination immunotherapy, summarise key recent clinical data from major immunotherapy trials, and explore how immunotherapy can be applied in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation in selected high-risk patients.

Influence of the Radiological Response on Histological Necrosis and on the Survival of Patients Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Secondary to Cirrhosis on the Liver Transplantation Waiting List

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transarterial chemoembolization is the most common treatment used for HCC patients on liver transplant waiting list. The aims of this study are to evaluate the radio-histological correlation of the post-chemoembolization HCC response and its influence on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

Monocentric, retrospective study, including liver transplant patients with HCC who received chemoembolization from 2007 to 2018. The response of the hypervascular nodules was evaluated according to mRECIST, EASL.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients with 122 hypervascular and 28 hypovascular HCCs were included. A complete radiological response concerned 34.3% patients. Concordance rates of hypervascular nodules (mRECIST, EASL and lipiodol uptake) with tumor necrosis ranged from 49% to 57%, with a specificity of 35% and a positive predictive value of 54%. Bilobar involvement was a predictive factor for incomplete radiological response. Major tumor necrosis was significantly correlated with the decrease in αFP level between the first CEL and liver transplantation. OS and RFS at 5 years were 64% and 60%, respectively, and 69% and 66% at complete radiological response.

CONCLUSION

Radiological response is significantly related to histological tumor necrosis, but with poor prediction. In case of complete radiological response, OS and RFS seem to be improved.

Pembrolizumab in combination with LEnvatinib in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplant as Neoadjuvant TherapY-PLENTY pilot study

BACKGROUND

The high recurrent rate after liver transplantation (LT) remains a clinical challenge, especially for those exceeding the Milan criteria (MC) and with high RETREAT scores. Therefore, the authors aim to investigate whether neoadjuvant systemic therapy allows safely administered and effectively reduces post-LT recurrence for those patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, pilot study, patients with HCC exceeding the MC were randomly assigned to PLENTY or control group before LT. The primary endpoint of the study was the recurrence-free survival after LT.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled and randomly assigned: 11 to the PLENTY group and 11 to the control group. The 30-month tumor-specific RFS was 37.5% in the PLENTY group and 12.5% in the control group. The 12-month tumor-specific RFS after LT was significantly improved in the PLENTY group (87.5%) compared to the control group (37.5%) ( P =0·0022). The objective response rate in the PLENTY group was 30 and 60% when determined by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively. Six patients (60%) had significant tumor necrosis, including three (30%) who had complete tumor necrosis at histopathology. No acute allograft rejection after LT occurred in the PLENTY and Control group.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib before LT appears to be safe and feasible, associated with significantly better RFS for patients exceeding the MC. Despite the limitations of small sample size, this is the first RCT to evaluate neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in LT recipients, the results of this study will inform future research.

Rethinking Immune Check Point Inhibitors Use in Liver Transplantation: Implications and Resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, including the two most common liver tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, but their use in the peri-transplantation period is controversial. ICI therapy aims to heighten cytotoxic T lymphocytes response against tumors. However, tumor recurrence is common owing to tumor immune response escape involving ablation of CTL response by interfering with antigen presentation, triggering CLT apoptosis and inducing epigenetic changes that promote ICI therapy resistance. ICI can also affect tissue resident memory T cell population, impact tolerance in the post-transplant period, and induce acute inflammation risking graft survival post-transplant. Their interaction with immunosuppression may be key in reducing tumor burden and may thus, require multimodal therapy to treat these tumors. This review summarizes ICI use in the liver transplantation period, their impact on tolerance and resistance, and new potential therapies for combination or sequential treatments for liver tumors.

Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Clinical Patterns and Hierarchy of Salvage Treatments

INTRODUCTION

The multiparametric nature of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) still leads to uncertainty with its practical management. This study aims to characterize the main posttransplant recurrence patterns of HCC and to explore the therapeutic modalities targeting recurrence.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC at a single tertiary center were analyzed. The time from first recurrence to death was investigated for each site of presentation. The impact of each recurrence-targeted treatment on survival was studied.

RESULTS

Of 660 patients with HCC, any recurrence occurred in 96 (15.4%) patients with a median time to recurrence of 20.0 months (95% CI: 15.6-23.8). Patients recurred across different patters including solitary distant locations (30.8%, n = 28), liver only (24.2%, n = 22), lung (18.7%, n = 17), multi-organ disease (17.6%, n = 16), and bone (8.8%, n = 8). Multi-organ and bone recurrences had the poorest survival, while solitary distant lesions and pulmonary recurrences had the best outcomes. Each treatment modality carried a distinctive survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients recurred across 3 patterns with different prognostic implications. The benefit of each treatment option on distinct recurrence patterns appears to be influenced by the biological behavior inherent in the recurrence pattern itself.

Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Large Integrated US Health System

Importance

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading oncologic cause of death among patients with cirrhosis, but large studies examining mortality trends are lacking.

Objective

To evaluate survival among patients with HCC in one of the largest integrated health care systems in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included 3441 adult patients who received a diagnosis of HCC between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, with end of follow-up on December 31, 2020. The study period was further categorized as era 1, defined as 2006 to 2012, and era 2, defined as 2013 to 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 2021 to June 2024.

Exposures

Patient demographic characteristics and disease factors.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause and HCC-specific mortality were used as primary end points, and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, race and ethnicity, cause of disease, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, alpha-fetoprotein level, and treatment type.

Results

Of 3441 patients with HCC, 2581 (75.0%) were men, and the median age was 65 years (IQR, 58-73 years). A total of 1195 patients (34.7%) received curative treatment, 1374 (39.9%) received noncurative treatment, and 872 (25.3%) received no treatment. During the study period, 2500 patients (72.7%) experienced all-cause mortality, and 1809 (52.6%) had HCC-specific mortality. In multivariable analysis, being 70 years of age or older (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.22-1.59), male sex (AHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35), BCLC stage C or D (AHR, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.15-2.67), increasing alpha-fetoprotein level (vs <20 ng/mL; 20-99 ng/mL: AHR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.38; ≥1000 ng/mL: AHR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.45-3.25), noncurative treatment (AHR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.16-2.90), and no treatment (AHR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.64-3.76) were associated with higher all-cause mortality, while Asian or Other Pacific Islander race and ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White; AHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.88) was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Survival improved in diagnosis era 2 (2013-2019; n = 2007) compared with diagnosis era 1 (2006-2012; n = 1434).

Conclusions and Relevance

This large, racially and ethnically diverse cohort study of patients with HCC found improving survival over time, especially among individuals with early-stage HCC receiving potentially curative treatments. This study highlights the importance of surveillance for detection of HCC at early stages, particularly among groups at risk for poorer outcomes.

Multidisciplinary approaches to downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma: present and future

Downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically defined as the reduction in size or number of viable tumors through locoregional therapy (LRT), aiming to meet the established criteria for liver transplantation (LT). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, a subgroup of patients with BCLC-B may benefit most from downstaging therapies. The United Network Organ Sharing downstaging protocol identifies potential candidates for downstaging by setting out 'inclusion criteria' and defining 'successful downstaging.' Additionally, the protocol considers factors related to tumor biology, such as an alphafetoprotein level <500 ng/mL after LRT. Reports indicate that successful downstaging rates following LRT are about 50%, with post- LT recurrence rates comparable to those of patients within the Milan criteria. A comprehensive multicenter US study on 10-year outcomes post-LT after downstaging showed 10-year post-LT survival and recurrence rates of 52.1% and 20.6%, respectively, for patients whose disease was downstaged; this compares to 61.5% and 13.3% for those consistently within the Milan criteria. Recently, the development of effective systemic treatments for HCC, such as immuno-oncologic agents, has provided additional opportunities for downstaging. Numerous clinical trials are exploring a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) combining LRT and systemic therapy. Although concrete evidence of the superiority of MDA for HCC downstaging is lacking, some retrospective studies and phase I and II trials have shown promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of MDA for this purpose. In this review, we will also discuss the future of MDA protocols in downstaging for improved clinical outcomes.

Survival benefit of living donor liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

With the increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in both the United States and globally, the role of liver transplantation in management continues to be an area of active conversation as it is often considered the gold standard in the treatment of HCC. The use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and the indications in the setting of malignancy, both generally and in HCC specifically, are frequently debated. In terms of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, LDLT is at least equivalent to DDLT, especially when performed for disease within Milan criteria. Emerging and compelling evidence suggests that LDLT is superior to DDLT in treating HCC as there is a significant decrease in waitlist mortality. As the oncologic indications for liver transplantation continue to expand and the gap between organ demand and organ availability continues to worsen, high volumes centers should consider using LDLT to shrink the ever-expanding waitlist.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults

Deaths from the majority of cancers are falling globally, but the incidence and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United Kingdom and in other Western countries. HCC is a highly fatal cancer, often diagnosed late, with an incidence to mortality ratio that approaches 1. Despite there being a number of treatment options, including those associated with good medium to long-term survival, 5-year survival from HCC in the UK remains below 20%. Sex, ethnicity and deprivation are important demographics for the incidence of, and/or survival from, HCC. These clinical practice guidelines will provide evidence-based advice for the assessment and management of patients with HCC. The clinical and scientific data underpinning the recommendations we make are summarised in detail. Much of the content will have broad relevance, but the treatment algorithms are based on therapies that are available in the UK and have regulatory approval for use in the National Health Service.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplantation: Current practice, challenges, and opportunities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are becoming a mainstay of cancer treatment. While first studied and approved for patients with unresectable disease, due to their efficacy, they are becoming increasingly used in the perioperative period across many cancer types. In patients with HCC, immune checkpoint inhibitors have now become the standard of care in the advanced setting and have shown promising results in the adjuvant setting after liver resection. While these drugs continue to show promise, their role in the peritransplant setting still remains a question. In this review, we explore the current use of this class of medications in patients with HCC, as well as the immunologic role of the pathways that they inhibit. We also identify potential for future research opportunities to better understand the role of these medications.

Prognostic Role of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Undergoing Chemoembolizations (DEM-TACE or cTACE) of the Liver: Exploring the Link between Tumor Microenvironment and Interventional Radiology

Inflammation-based scores are biomarkers of the crosstalk between the tumor microenvironment and the immune response. Investigating the intricate relationship between the tumor stromal microenvironment, biomarkers, and the response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is essential for early identification of TACE refractoriness or failure, providing insights into tumor biology and facilitating personalized therapeutic interventions. This study addresses a dearth of recent literature exploring the prognostic significance of the preoperative LMR in individuals from western countries diagnosed with stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing drug eluting microspheres TACE (DEM-TACE) or conventional TACE (cTACE). This international multi-center retrospective analysis included consecutive patients with stage B HCC who underwent TACE from January 2017 to June 2023. The study evaluated the ability of the preoperative LMR to predict complete response (CR), objective response (OR), sustained response duration (SRD) exceeding 6 months, successful downstaging at 6 months, progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, and overall survival (OS) at 6 months. The study population included 109 HCC patients and it was divided into low LMR (LMR < 2.24) and high LMR (LMR ≥ 2.24) groups, according to ROC curve analysis to select the optimal LMR cut-off value. High LMR was associated with lower Hepatitis C prevalence, higher absolute lymphocyte count, and a trend toward lower alpha-fetoprotein. The group with high LMRs exhibited superior CR rates (14.9% vs. 0%), overall OR (43.2% vs. 14.3%), and better PFS at 6 months (75.7% vs. 45.7%). The LMR, specifically categorized as <2.24 and ≥2.24, emerged as a robust predictor for treatment response and short-term outcomes in patients with stage B HCC undergoing DEM- or c-TACE.

Insights in Molecular Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active recruiting clinical trials on targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Combinations of different agents and medical therapy along with radiological interventions were analyzed for the setting of advanced HCC. Those settings were also analyzed in combination with adjuvant situations after resection or radiological treatments. We summarized the current knowledge for each therapeutic setting and combination that currently is or has been under clinical evaluation. We further discuss the results in the background of current treatment guidelines. In addition, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways for each of these investigated targets and drugs to further elucidate the molecular background and underlying mechanisms of action. Established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for patients are considered for systemic treatment: atezolizumab/bevacizumab, durvalumab/tremelimumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Combination treatment for systemic treatment and local ablative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies are under clinical investigation.

Current role and perspectives of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review of the past 20 years

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant global health challenge, and liver transplantation (LT) remains the best curative option. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) emerged as a potential solution to organ scarcity, reducing waitlist times. This comprehensive review explores LDLT practices, focusing on patient selection criteria and oncologic outcomes. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines included 50 studies (2004-2023) with 8062 patients. Data encompassed baseline characteristics, HCC features, and oncologic outcomes. Further analysis categorized results by geography and publication year. Heterogeneity in patient demographics, tumor burden, and transplant characteristics was observed. Recent LDLT series demonstrated a shift towards refined selection criteria, increased neoadjuvant treatment, and improved oncologic outcomes. Geographic disparities revealed unique challenges in Eastern and Western practices. LDLT proves effective for HCC, addressing donor shortages. Evolving practices highlight the importance of refining inclusion criteria and optimizing tumor management. While geographic differences exist, LDLT, when judiciously applied, offers promising outcomes.

A Multicenter International Retrospective Investigation Assessing the Prognostic Role of Inflammation-Based Scores (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte, and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios) in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Undergoing Chemoembolizations of the Liver

BACKGROUND

The utilization of inflammation-based scores, such as the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), has garnered attention for their potential as prognostic indicators in various cancers. However, their predictive role in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains an area that requires further investigation, as early recognition of TACE refractoriness holds the potential to guide tailored therapeutic interventions.

METHODS

This multicenter international retrospective study analyzed data from patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE between 2018 and 2024. Inflammation-based scores (NLR, LMR, PLR) were assessed preoperatively to predict treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled. Preoperative LMR showed the largest area under the curve for the prediction of 6-months PFS, based on the ROC curve analysis. Both high LMR (≥2.24) and low NLR (<4.72) were associated with improved objective response rates and 6-month progression-free survival. Lymphocyte count emerged as a strong predictor of treatment response in both simple (p < 0.001) and multiple (p < 0.001) logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the prognostic value of inflammation-based scores, particularly LMR and NLR, in predicting the treatment response and short-term outcomes of patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE. Future investigations should focus on validating these scores' clinical applicability and assessing their impact on long-term patient survival and therapeutic decision-making.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Effectiveness of Different Particle Sizes in Downstaging and Bridging in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with different particle sizes in bridging and downstaging in pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Assess the recurrent and survival rates after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 580 patients who underwent TACE using DEB from August 2012 to June 2020 at Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Pre- and post-TACE computed tomography scan images of the liver were reviewed, and treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Patients were divided by who met the criteria (n = 342) or beyond (n = 238) the University of California San Francisco criteria for successful bridging and downstaging rate evaluation. Each group was divided into subgroups according to DEB particle sizes (group A: <100μm, group B: 100-300 μm, group C: 300-500 μm, and group D: 500-700 μm) to compare objective response rate and post-LDLT survival rate.

RESULTS

Overall successful bridging and downstaging rate is 97.1% and 58.4%, respectively, in the group of patients who meet the criteria (n = 332) and are beyond (n = 139) the University of California San Francisco criteria. Group B (100-300 μm) had a higher successful bridging rate (99.5%, P = .003) and downstaging rate (63.8%, P = .443). This subgroup also demonstrated a higher objective response rate in single (93.2%, P = .038) tumors, multiple (83.3%, P = .001) tumors, and tumors with size less than 5 cm (93.9%, P = .005). There are no significant differences in post-LDLT overall survival rate between different particle sizes.

CONCLUSION

TACE with 100 to 300 μm DEB particles is associated with a better chance of bridging and downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma patients to LDLT.

[Liver transplantation for treatment of nonresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies : Hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases]

BACKGROUND

With the increasing efficacy of systemic therapy, liver transplantation plays an important role not only for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but also for nonresectable intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (iCC), perihilar cholangiocellular carcinoma (phCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

AIM

To review the current state of knowledge regarding the indications, patient selection and expected outcomes of liver transplantation for HCC, iCC, phCC and CRLM.

RESULTS

When combined with neoadjuvant locoregional therapy (LRT) and/or systemic therapy, patients with nonresectable HCC, iCC, pCC and CRLM confined to the liver can be successfully transplanted with 5‑year survival rates exceeding 65%. The key to success is strict patient selection, which includes oncogenetic (e.g., BRAFV600E mutation status) and clinical criteria indicative of individual tumor biology (tumor markers: alpha-fetoprotein, AFP/carbohydrate antigen 19‑9, CA19-9/carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA, stable response to neoadjuvant therapy) in addition to morphometric criteria.

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation offers the possibility of curative treatment even for nonresectable hepatic malignancies. A major limitation of this treatment is the lack of donor organs. Crucial for success is patient selection based on individual tumor biology.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Indication of Liver Transplant for HCC: Current Status and Future Directions

Purpose of Review

Liver transplantation remains the gold-standard treatment for cirrhotic patients with early stage, surgically unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we describe the current state of liver transplantation (LT) for HCC.

Recent Findings

We review recent advances in expanded indications for LT, diagnostics with liquid biopsy and biomarkers, and the emerging role of immunotherapy in this patient population.

Summary

Although the shortage of liver allografts necessitates a restrictive HCC selection policy, future advances in patient selection, liquid biopsy technologies and systemic therapies have the potential to improve access to liver transplantation even in patients with expanded indications, without compromising on post-transplant outcomes.

Systemic Drugs for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Recent Clinical Trials Reveal About Sequencing and the Emerging Complexities of Clinical Decisions?

Liver cancer was the fourth leading cause of cancer death in 2015 with increasing incidence between 1990 and 2015. Orthotopic liver transplantation, surgical resection and ablation comprise the only curative therapy options. However, due to the late manifestation of clinical symptoms, many patients present with intermediate or advanced disease, resulting in no curative treatment option being available. Whereas intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually still addressable by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), advanced-stage HCC is amenable only to pharmacological treatments. Conventional cytotoxic agents failed demonstrating relevant effect on survival also because their use was severely limited by the mostly underlying insufficient liver function. For a decade, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib was the only systemic therapy that proved to have a clinically relevant effect in the treatment of advanced HCC. In recent years, the number of substances for systemic treatment of advanced HCC has increased enormously. In addition to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and antiangiogenic drugs are increasingly being applied. The combination of anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab has become the new standard of care for advanced HCC due to its remarkable response rates. This requires more and more complex clinical decisions regarding tumor therapy. This review aims at summarizing recent developments in systemic therapy, considering data on first- and second-line treatment, use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and combination with locoregional procedures.

Expanding the Boundaries for Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, which was the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020. Transplantation remains the preferred treatment for cure in otherwise unresectable HCC. There are several areas of active research that have led to expansion of eligibility criteria for transplantation including local-regional therapy for downstaging patients presenting outside of the Milan criteria and identification of tumor biomarkers aiding in the early diagnosis, determining prognosis and likelihood of recurrence after transplantation for HCC. New neoadjuvant therapies and post-transplant immunosuppression regimens may also result in expansion of transplant eligibility criteria for HCC.

Liver Transplant as a Treatment of Primary and Secondary Liver Neoplasms

Importance

Liver malignancies are an increasing global health concern with a high mortality. We review outcomes following liver transplant for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Observations

Transplant may be a suitable treatment option for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies in well-selected patient populations.

Conclusions and Relevance

Many patients with primary or secondary liver tumors are not eligible for liver resection because of advanced underlying liver disease or high tumor burden, precluding complete tumor clearance. Although liver transplant has been a long-standing treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, recently transplant has been considered for patients with other malignant diagnoses. In particular, while well-established for hepatocellular carcinoma and select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, transplant has been increasingly used to treat patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, as well as metastatic disease from colorectal liver and neuroendocrine primary tumors. Because of the limited availability of grafts and the number of patients on the waiting list, optimal selection criteria must be further defined. The ethics of organ allocation to individuals who may benefit from prolonged survival after transplant yet have a high incidence of recurrence, as well as the role of living donation, need to be further discerned in the setting of transplant oncology.

Transplant oncology - Current indications and strategies to advance the field

Liver transplantation (LT) was originally described by Starzl as a promising strategy to treat primary malignancies of the liver. Confronted with high recurrence rates, indications drifted towards non-oncologic liver diseases with LT finally evolving from a high-risk surgery to an almost routine surgical procedure. Continuously improving outcomes following LT and evolving oncological treatment strategies have driven renewed interest in transplant oncology. This is not only reflected by constant refinements to the criteria for LT in patients with HCC, but especially by efforts to expand indications to other primary and secondary liver malignancies. With new patient-centred oncological treatments on the rise and new technologies to expand the donor pool, the field has the chance to come full circle. In this review, we focus on the concept of transplant oncology, current indications, as well as technical and ethical aspects in the context of donor organs as precious resources.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and A Glimpse into The Future

Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we explored the development of LT selection criteria and organ allocation policies, comparing original data to underscore their historical progression into the intricate task of quantitatively estimating pre- and post-LT survivals. We emphasized the role of biomarkers such as serum alpha-fetoprotein, Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, we examined the transplant-associated survival benefits and the difficulties in accurately calculating these benefits. We also reviewed recent advancements in targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for advanced, inoperable HCC and projected their integration into LT for HCC. We further discussed the growing use of living donor liver transplants in the United States and compared its outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplants. Furthermore, we examined the progress in machine perfusion techniques, which have shown potential in improving patient outcomes and enlarging the donor pool. These advancements present opportunities to enhance LT patient survivals, refine selection criteria, establish new priority metrics, develop innovative bridging and downstaging strategies, and formulate redesigned LT strategies for HCC treatments.

Downstaging Techniques for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Candidates Awaiting Liver Transplantation

During the last decade, downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma has expanded the pool of patients eligible for liver transplantation. The literature is rife with attempts to elucidate best treatment strategies with novel locoregional and systemic therapies continuing to emerge. Several trials have confirmed the large-scale success of downstaging protocols, with equitable long-term survival and recurrence rates after liver transplant. We review the currently available techniques used for downstaging, including their indications, complications, and efficacies. New frontiers have focused on the potential role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, although more research is needed to delineate its role in current treatment paradigms.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2023: Italian practice Treatment Guidelines of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery (AICEP), Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO), Italian Association of Radiology and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), Italian Society of Pathological Anatomy and Diagnostic Cytology (SIAPeC-IAP), Italian Society of Surgery (SIC), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), Italian Organ Transplant Society (SITO), and Association of Patients with Hepatitis and Liver Disease (EpaC) - Part I - Surgical treatments

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of HCC management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the first part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and surgical treatments of HCC.