Clinical application of the GLOBE and United Kingdom-primary biliary cholangitis risk scores in a trial cohort of patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Pemafibrate improves liver biochemistry and GLOBE scores in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: Nationwide, multicenter study by the Japanese Red Cross Liver Study Group

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the effect of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator, on patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) complicated by dyslipidemia.

METHODS

In total, 61 patients with PBC (Add-on group: 33 patients on ursodeoxycholic acid [UDCA] + pemafibrate combination therapy; Switch group: 28 patients who switched from UDCA + other fibrates to UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy) were included in the study. Changes in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and GLOBE scores were retrospectively analyzed from 6 months before to 12 months after treatment. The POISE criteria were also used to evaluate the treatment efficacy after 12 months.

RESULTS

After 12 months of UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy, AST significantly decreased from 45 ± 3 to 28 ± 3 U/L (p < 0.05), ALT from 49 ± 5 to 32 ± 5 U/L (p < 0.005), GGT from 155 ± 223 to 91 ± 182 U/L (p < 0.005), and ALP from 1.4 ± 0.9 to 0.9 ± 0.8 × upper limit of normal (p < 0.0005) in all patients. ALT, GGT, and ALP levels were significantly lower after 12 months of UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy in both the Add-on and Switch groups. After 12 months of combination therapy, the mean GLOBE score of all patients significantly decreased from 0.37 to 0.01 (p < 0.05) and the percentage of patients with a GLOBE score of 0.3 or higher decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PBC who showed an inadequate response to prior therapy, pemafibrate add-on or switch therapy improved liver biochemistry and GLOBE scores. Pemafibrate may be useful as a second-line drug when UDCA alone is inadequate, or as an alternative after combination therapy with other fibrates.

The External Validation of GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores for Predicting Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment Response in a Large U.S. Cohort of Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients

Background: The cornerstone treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but many patients exhibit an incomplete response, leading to disease progression. Risk prediction models like the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores hold promise for patient stratification and management. We aimed to independently assess the predictive accuracy of these risk scores for UDCA response in a prospective U.S. cohort. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a U.S. liver center, monitoring UDCA-treated PBC patients over a one-year follow-up. We evaluated the predictive efficacy of the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores for UDCA treatment response, comparing them to the Paris II criteria. Efficacy was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses, followed by prognostic performance evaluation via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: We evaluated 136 PBC patients undergoing UDCA therapy. Based on the Paris II criteria, patients were categorized into UDCA full-response and non-response groups. The GLOBE score identified a non-responder rate of 18% (p = 0.205), compared to 20% (p = 0.014) with the Paris II criteria. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age and biochemical markers, showed that both the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were strongly associated with treatment response (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.95) for the GLOBE score and 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99) for the UK-PBC risk score. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that GLOBE and UK-PBC scores effectively predict UDCA treatment response in PBC patients. The early identification of patients at risk of an incomplete response could improve treatment strategies and identify patients who may need second-line therapies.

Long-term outcomes in patients with primary biliary cholangitis complicated with CREST syndrome

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is frequently associated with autoimmune disease. Although PBC complicated with CREST syndrome (PBC-CREST) has been reported, the long-term outcomes of the affected patients have not been fully investigated. Herein, the long-term outcomes of PBC-CREST were evaluated. Next, the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were validated and compared between the PBC alone and PBC-CREST groups. A total of 302 patients who were diagnosed with PBC between December 1990 and August 2021 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital were included. The liver transplantation (LT)-free survival rates were compared between patients with PBC alone (n = 245) and those with PBC-CREST (n = 57). Moreover, 173 patients, excluding those with liver-related death/LT within 1 year after ursodeoxycholic acid administration, were divided into two subgroups (PBC alone (n = 147) and PBC-CREST (n = 26)), and the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were compared between the subgroups. The survival rates without LT (3/5/10 years) were 92/87/80% for the PBC-alone group and 98/96/96% for the PBC-CREST group, with a significantly better prognosis in the PBC-CREST group (log-rank P = 0.0172). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of CREST syndrome is an independent protective factor for the presence of cirrhosis. The predicted 5/10/15-year risks of liver-related death or LT based on the UK-PBC score were significantly lower in the PBC-CREST group (2.4/7.6/13.2%) than in the PBC-alone group (4.8/11.8/18.8%) (P < 0.05). The predicted 3/5-year LT-free survival rates based on the GLOBE score were significantly higher in the PBC-CREST group (93/88%) than in the PBC-alone group (88/81%) (P < 0.05). Patients with PBC-CREST may have better long-term outcomes than those with PBC alone.

Treatment in primary biliary cholangitis: Beyond ursodeoxycholic acid

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare cholestatic immune-mediated liver disease. The clinical course varies from mild to severe, with a substantial group of patients developing cirrhosis within a decade. These patients are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensation and liver failure. First line Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves the cholestatic surrogate markers, and was recently associated with a favorable survival free of liver transplantation, even in case of an incomplete biochemical response. However, despite adequate UDCA therapy, patients remain at risk of liver disease progression. Therefore, on-treatment multifactor-based risk stratification is necessary to identify patients in need of additional therapy. This requires a personalized approach; especially as recent studies suggest that complete biochemical normalization as most stringent response criterion might be preferred in selected patients to optimize their outcome. Today, stricter biochemical goals might actually be reachable with the addition of farnesoid X receptor or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, or, in highly-selected cases, use of corticosteroids. Randomized controlled trials showed improvements in the key biochemical surrogate markers with the addition of these drugs, which have also been associated with improved clinical outcome. Considering this evolving PBC landscape, with more versatile treatment options and treatment goals, this review recapitulates the recent insight in UDCA therapy, the selection of patients with a residual risk of liver disease progression and the results of the currently available second line treatment options.

Longitudinal outcomes of obeticholic acid therapy in ursodiol-nonresponsive primary biliary cholangitis: Stratifying the impact of add-on fibrates in real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid occurs in 40% of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, affecting survival. Achieving a deep response (normalisation of alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and bilirubin ≤0.6 upper limit of normal) improves survival. Yet, the long-term effectiveness of second-line treatments remains uncertain.

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA) ± fibrates. Focusing on biochemical response (ALP ≤1.67 times the upper limit of normal, with a decrease of at least 15% from baseline and normal bilirubin levels), normalisation of ALP, deep response and biochemical remission (deep response plus aminotransferase normalisation).

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal, observational, multicentre study involving ursodeoxyccholic acid non-responsive PBC patients (Paris-II criteria) from Spain and Portugal who received OCA ± fibrates.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients, median follow-up was 35.1 months (IQR: 20.2-53). The biochemical response in the whole cohort was 47.2%, 61.4% and 68.6% at 12, 24 and 36 months. GLOBE-PBC and 5-year UK-PBC scores improved (p < 0.001). Triple therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid plus OCA plus fibrates) had significantly higher response rates than dual therapy (p = 0.001), including ALP normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, triple therapy remained independently associated with biochemical response (p = 0.024), alkaline phosphatase normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 41.2% of cases, leading to 18.8% discontinuing OCA. Out of 55 patients with cirrhosis, 12 developed decompensation. All with baseline portal hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy was superior in achieving therapeutic goals in UDCA-nonresponsive PBC. Decompensation was linked to pre-existing portal hypertension.

Efficacy of fibrates in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: a meta-analysis

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who respond poorly to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are increasingly being trialed using fibrates, showing promising results. To further investigate, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of administrating fibrates to patients with PBC. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched using the keywords "bezafibrate", "fenofibrate", "fibrate", "primary biliary cholangitis" and clinical studies involving the use of fibrates in patients with PBC were included. The primary outcome of this study was the effect of fibrates administration on biochemical markers related to cholestasis in patients with PBC, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. A total of 20 studies with 4783 participants were included in this study. The results revealed that adding fibrates could significantly reduce the levels of ALP (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 370.14, P = 0.04; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 184.15, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (MD: - 2.82, P = 0.04), GGT (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 140.88, P < 0.01; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 130.73, P = 0.04), alleviate pruritus symptoms (RD: - 0.20, 95% CI: - 0.39 ~  - 0.01, P = 0.04), and did not significantly increase the incidence of treatment-related side effects. Fibrates can significantly improve liver biochemical parameters and alleviate pruritus in PBC patients.

Risk Stratification in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease with a heterogeneous presentation, symptomatology, disease progression, and response to therapy. The current risk stratification assessment, aimed at identifying patients with a higher risk of disease progression, encompasses an in-depth analysis of demographic data, clinical and laboratory findings, antibody profiles, and the evaluation of liver fibrosis using both invasive and noninvasive techniques. Treatment response scores after one year of therapy remain to date a major factor influencing the prognosis of PBC patients. While the initial therapeutic approach with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is universally applied, new second-line treatment options have recently emerged, with many others under investigation. Consequently, the prevailing one-size-fits-all approach is poised to be supplanted by tailored strategies, ensuring high-risk patients receive the most appropriate treatment regimen from diagnosis. This will require the development of a risk prediction model to assess, at the time of diagnosis, the course, outcome, and response to first and additional treatments of PBC patients. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging tools used for risk stratification in PBC and speculates on how these developments might shape the disease landscape in the near future.

Primary biliary cholangitis: Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune liver disease characterized by a destructive, small duct, and lymphocytic cholangitis, and marked by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies. The incidence and prevalence of PBC vary widely in different regions and time periods, and although disproportionally more common among White non-Hispanic females, contemporary data show a higher prevalence in males and racial minorities than previously described. Outcomes largely depend on early recognition of the disease and prompt institution of treatment, which, in turn, are directly influenced by provider bias and socioeconomic factors. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the initial treatment of choice for PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates (off-label therapy) reserved as add-on therapy for the management of inadequate responders or those with ursodeoxycholic acid intolerance. Novel and repurposed drugs are currently at different stages of clinical development not only for the treatment of PBC but also for its symptomatic management. Here, we summarize the most up-to-date data regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of PBC, providing clinically useful information for its holistic management.

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment-induced GLOBE score changes are associated with liver transplantation-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) can improve the GLOBE score. We aimed to assess the association between changes in the GLOBE score (ΔGLOBE) and liver transplantation (LT)-free survival in patients with PBC who were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

METHODS

Among UDCA-treated patients within the Global PBC cohort, the association between ΔGLOBE ( 0-1 : during first year of UDCA, 1-2 : during second year) and the risk of LT or death was assessed through Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 3775 UDCA-treated patients were included; 3424 [90.7%] were female, median age 54.0 (IQR 45.9-62.4) years and median baseline GLOBE score was 0.25 (IQR -0.47 - 0.96). During a median follow-up of 7.2 (IQR 3.7-11.5) years, 730 patients reached the combined endpoint of LT or death. Median ΔGLOBE 0-1 was -0.27 (IQR -0.56 - 0.02). Cox regression analyses, adjusted for pretreatment GLOBE score and ΔGLOBE 0-12 , showed that ΔGLOBE was associated with LT or death (adjusted HR 2.28, 95%CI 1.81-2.87, p <0.001). The interaction between baseline GLOBE score and ΔGLOBE 0-1 was not statistically significant ( p =0.296). The ΔGLOBE 1-2 was associated with LT or death (adjusted HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.67-2.86, p<0.001), independently from the baseline GLOBE score and de change in GLOBE score during the first year of UDCA.

CONCLUSION

UDCA-induced changes in the GLOBE score were significantly associated with LT-free survival in patients with PBC. While the relative risk reduction of LT or death was stable, the absolute risk reduction was heavily dependent on the baseline prognosis of the patient.

Prognostic Scoring Systems in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: An Update

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a complex, chronic disease with a heterogeneous presentation, disease progression, and response to therapy. Several prognostic models based on disease stage and/or treatment response enhance risk stratification and therapeutic management. Recent work on disease modeling proposed early prediction of outcomes at PBC onset, yet this has not been implemented in clinical practice. Although early stratification of patients based on their individual risk of developing end-stage liver disease may prove cost-effective and actually become matter of medical deontology to timely offer the best therapeutic option, given the forthcoming availability of novel, disease-modifying drugs. This review outlines established and novel prognostic systems in PBC and provides some perspectives on the potential role of omics-derived biomarkers in developing reliable risk prediction models and promoting the implementation of personalized medicine in PBC.

Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapy used for the treatment of PBC. In recent years, new pharmacological agents have been proposed for PBC therapy to cure UDCA-non-responders. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is registered in many countries for PBC, and fibrates also seem to be effective in ameliorating biochemistry alteration and symptoms typical of PBC. Moreover, a variety of new agents, acting with different mechanisms of action, are under clinical evaluation for PBC treatment, including PPAR agonists, anti-NOX agents, immunomodulators, and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Since an insufficient amount of data is currently available about the effect of these novel approaches on robust clinical endpoints, such as transplant-free survival, their clinical approval needs to be supported by the consistent improvement of these parameters. The intensive research in this field will hopefully lead to a novel treatment landscape for PBC in the near future, with innovative therapies based on the combination of multiple agents acting on different pathogenetic mechanisms.

Proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND & AIM

Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03112681 LAY SUMMARY: Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group.

Portal hypertension in primary biliary cholangitis: prevalence, natural history and histological correlates

OBJECTIVES

The histopathological mechanisms underlying portal hypertension in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are poorly understood, as is its natural history. We have therefore determined the prevalence, severity and progression of portal hypertension in PBC and investigated whether its presence is related to specific histological lesions.

METHODS

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured in 86 patients, with 186 assessments over up to 7 years of follow-up and the results correlated with a semiquantitative grading of 8 histological features and nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH).

RESULTS

Portal hypertension (HVPG >5 mmHg) was present in 88% of all assessments (86% at baseline), and in 45% of patients at baseline was >12 mmHg (high-risk portal hypertension). The rise in portal pressure occurs early in the disease, since 45% of patients with normal serum bilirubin had a raised HVPG, as did 72% of patients with early (Ludwig stages 1 and 2) disease. After baseline, there was a small increase in HVPG over the next 5 years in most patients. In patients with precirrhotic PBC, 82% had portal hypertension and in 34% this was >12 mmHg. Portal pressure correlated significantly with a semiquantitative grading of cholestasis, interface hepatitis and portal tract and sinusoidal fibrosis. NRH was present in only 20% of wedge biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal hypertension commences in the early stages of PBC, long preceding both rises in serum bilirubin and the development of cirrhosis. Around 34% of precirrhotic PBC patients have 'high-risk' portal hypertension, which is associated with lesions in the portal tracts and sinusoids rather than with NRH.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Predictors of Poor Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid after 1 Year of Treatment in Moroccan Patients

Introduction: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the new dominance of primary biliary cirrhosis, is a cholestatic disease of autoimmune etiology and represents the leading cause of intra-hepatic cholestasis. Treatment is mainly based on ursodeoxycholic acid. The biological response to treatment is the main predictor of survival without liver transplantation. The Globe-score has been recently validated as the main prognostic factor. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study carried out in our department collating all cases of PBC followed in consultation. The aim of our work is to research the predictors of poor response to UDCA. Results: 46 patients were collected. The mean age of the patients was 58.82 years, with a predominance of women (n = 43, 93.5%). 34.78% of patients were in the stage of cirrhosis. Anti-M2 mitochondria antibodies were positive in 44 patients (95.65%). An overlap syndrome was found in 11 patients (23.9%). Treatment was based on UDCA combined with corticosteroid therapy and immunosuppressant for overlap syndrome. A biochemical response at 1 year of treatment according to the Paris II criteria was found in 47.8%. The average value of the globe score was 1.35. A score greater than 0.30 was objectified in 20 cases (43.47%). Nineteen cirrhotic patients (41.30%) had a globe score> 0.30. Factors associated with poor response to therapy were: stage of decompensated cirrhosis, elevated pre-therapy total bilirubin greater than 30 g / l and hypoalbunemia less than 35 g / l. The study of the correlation between Globe score and Paris II showed a strong and significant association with a correlation coefficient estimated at 67%. The Paris II score was significantly correlated with the response to treatment (p = 0.001). Conclusion: In accordance with the data in the literature, the globe-score and Paris II are two similar predictive means for evaluating the response at 1 year of treatment in Moroccan context. Keywords: Morocco, Predictors of response, Primary biliary cholangitis, Ursodeoxycholic acid

Efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid in liver disease-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Currently, there is no pharmacotherapy for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder. In contrast, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease for which ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the drug of choice. However, 50% of PBC patients may not respond to UDCA. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is emerging as a vital pharmacotherapy for these chronic disorders. We aimed to analyse the safety and efficacy of OCA.

METHODS

We performed an extensive search of electronic databases from 01/01/2000 to 31/03/2020. We included randomized controlled trials of OCA in patients with NASH, PBC, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We assessed the histological improvement in NASH, reduction in alkaline phosphatase (≤1.67 ULN) in PBC, and the adverse effects of OCA.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (n = 2834) were included. Of the total RCTs, there were three on both NASH and PBC and one on PSC. OCA improved NASH fibrosis [OR: 1.95 (1.47-2.59; p < 0.001)]. With the 10 mg OCA dose, the odds of improvement was 1.61 (1.03-2.51; p = 0.03), while with the 25 mg dose, it was 2.23 (1.55-3.18; p < 0.001). However, 25 mg OCA led to significant adverse events and discontinuation of the drug [2.8 (1.42-3.02); p < 0.001)] compared with 10 mg OCA [0.95 (0.6-1.5); p = 0.84] in NASH patients. In PBC patients, the response to 5 mg OCA was better than with the higher doses [5 mg: 7.66 (3.12-18.81; p < 0.001), 10 mg: 5.18 (2-13.41; p = 0.001), 25 mg: 2.36 (0.94-5.93; p = 0.06), 50 mg: 4.08 (1.05-15.78; p = 0.04)]. The risk of pruritus was lowest with 5 mg OCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of OCA are effective and safe in NASH and cholestatic liver disease. While 10 mg OCA is effective for NASH fibrosis regression, only 5 mg OCA is required for PBC.

The association of histological progression with biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is currently diagnosed at an early stage; therefore, the number of patients with PBC without symptoms at the time of diagnosis is increasing. However, up to 30% of patients with PBC exhibit the suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and are at high risk of end-stage liver disease. Obeticholic acid is an approved second-line therapy for patients with PBC that are refractory to UDCA. Novel surrogate endpoints are required to identify individuals eligible for second-line therapies. An inadequate biochemical response to UDCA is a useful predictor of poor outcomes in patients with PBC. In addition to UDCA effects on biochemical parameters, histological outcomes could be considered as candidate surrogate endpoints. Alterations in liver histology are used as surrogate endpoints in clinical studies. However, current staging systems are insufficient to determine PBC disease severity and progression because of the pathological heterogeneity of the disease. Histological features at baseline and biochemical response to UDCA treatment can affect the disease course of PBC. Therefore, novel surrogate endpoints must be represented by parameters characterized by histological outcomes and treatment responses in PBC. In this review, we discuss the existing histological parameters and newly created factors to identify patients with PBC who are at a high risk of developing end-stage liver disease and, consequently, the potential need for additional treatments.

Obeticholic acid is associated with improvements in AST-to-platelet ratio index and GLOBE score in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Background & Aims

Biochemical markers, including GLOBE score and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), are used to stratify risk in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of obeticholic acid (OCA) on categorical shifts in GLOBE score, APRI, and both combined, based on data from POISE, a phase III placebo-controlled trial in patients with PBC who had an incomplete response or were intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid.

Methods

In a post hoc analysis, baseline and Month 12 data from POISE were used to calculate the APRI and GLOBE score. Patients were stratified into 3 risk groups based on a combination of APRI (0.54) and GLOBE (0.3 or age-specific) thresholds.

Results

The analysis included 215 patients (47 low risk; 79 moderate risk; 89 high risk). Using the combined GLOBE score (threshold of 0.3) and APRI thresholds, there was improvement in ≥1 risk stage in 37% and 35% of patients in the OCA 5–10 mg and 10 mg groups, respectively, vs. 12% in the placebo group (both p <0.05). Progression occurred in 10% and 0% in the 5–10 mg and 10 mg groups vs. 37% in the placebo group. Results with GLOBE age-specific thresholds were similar.

Conclusions

Based on change in APRI and GLOBE score at 12 months, OCA treatment is associated with reduction in the predicted risk of liver-related complications in patients with PBC.

Lay summary

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic disease affecting the liver. People who suffer from PBC are at risk of serious long-term complications. Information from certain blood tests can be used to estimate the likelihood of experiencing long-term complications. The results of this study showed that based on blood test results, people taking obeticholic acid, with or without ursodeoxycholic acid, for PBC were predicted to have a better outcome than those taking placebo.

Clinical trials registration

NCT01473524.

•

Biochemical markers can help estimate risk of progression in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

•

Data from the POISE trial were used to calculate GLOBE score and aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index.

•

Obeticholic acid treatment was associated with a shift to lower risk of progression.

Adjuvant treatments for biliary atresia

The treatment of biliary atresia (BA) is predominantly surgical with firstly an attempt at restoration of bile flow from the native liver by wide excision of the obstructed, obliterated extrahepatic biliary tree to the level of the porta hepatis and a portoenterostomy using a long Roux loop-Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). Liver transplantation is reserved for those that fail this and for those where surgery is considered futile for reasons of age or stage of disease. As the aetiology of BA remains ill-defined, so adjuvant treatment has been largely based on pragmatism, trial and error. Systematic analysis of the few randomized placebo-controlled trial data and less well-controlled cohort studies have suggested benefit from post-operative high-dose steroids and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) while the benefit of long-term prophylactic antibiotics, bile acid sequestrants (e.g., colestyramine) or probiotics remains unproven. Newer modalities such as antiviral therapy (AVT), immunoglobulin, FXR agonists (e.g., obeticholic acid), ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) antagonists (e.g., maralixibat) remain unproven. This article reviews the current evidence for the efficacy of adjuvant medical therapy in BA.

Validation of Risk Scoring Systems in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification based on biochemical variables is a useful tool for monitoring ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Several UDCA response criteria and scoring systems have been proposed for risk prediction in PBC, but these have not been validated in large external cohorts.

METHODS

We performed a study on data of 1746 UDCA-treated patients with PBC from 25 centers in Europe, United States, and Canada. The prognostic performance of the risk scoring systems (GLOBE and UK-PBC) and the UDCA response criteria (Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II, Rotterdam, and Toronto) were evaluated. We regarded cirrhosis-related complications (ascites, variceal bleeding, and/or hepatic encephalopathy) as clinical end points.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients reached a clinical end point during a median 7 years (range 1-16 years) of follow-up. The 5-, 10- and 15-year adverse outcome-free survivals were 95%, 85%, and 77%. The GLOBE and UK-PBC scores predicted cirrhosis-related complications better than the UDCA response criteria. The hazard ratio (HR) for a 1 standard deviation increase was HR 5.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.43-5.74, P < 0.001) for the GLOBE score and HR 3.39 (95% CI: 3.10-3.72, P < 0.001) for the UK-PBC score. Overall, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores showed similar and excellent prognostic performance (C-statistic, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91%-95% vs 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91%-0.96%).

DISCUSSION

In our international, multicenter PBC cohort, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scoring systems were good predictors of future cirrhosis-related complications.

Long-term efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid for patients with primary biliary cholangitis: 3-year results of an international open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid for patients with primary biliary cholangitis using 3-year interim data from the 5-year open-label extension of the pivotal phase 3 POISE trial.

METHODS

In the double-blind phase of POISE, 217 patients with primary biliary cholangitis with inadequate response to or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid were randomised to receive placebo, obeticholic acid 5 to 10 mg, or obeticholic acid 10 mg once daily for 12 months. During the open-label extension phase, patients received variable, adjusted doses of obeticholic acid. Markers of cholestasis and liver injury, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total and direct bilirubin were evaluated, and safety was assessed for up to 48 months of treatment with obeticholic acid. All analyses in the open-label extension were done in the safety population, defined as any patient randomised in the double-blind phase who received at least one dose of obeticholic acid during the open-label extension. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01473524) and with EudraCT (2011-004728-36).

FINDINGS

193 patients were treated during the open-label extension. In this 3-year interim analysis, ALP concentrations were significantly reduced compared with baseline at 12 months (mean change -105·2 U/L [SD 87·6]), 24 months (-101·0 U/L [98·5]), 36 months (-108·6 U/L [95·7]), and 48 months (-95·6 U/L [121·1]; p<0·0001 for all yearly time points). Total bilirubin concentrations were stabilised, with significant reductions versus baseline at 12 months (mean change -0·9 μmol/L [SD 4·1]; p=0·0042) and 48 months (-0·8 μmol/L [3·8]; p=0·016). Stabilisation was also noted for direct bilirubin, with a significant change from baseline at 12 months (mean change -0·5 μmol/L [SD 3·0]; p=0·021). However, changes in total and direct bilirubin were not significant at other time points. Obeticholic acid was generally well tolerated, with pruritus (149 [77%] patients) and fatigue (63 [33%]) being the most common adverse events. No serious adverse events were considered related to obeticholic acid.

INTERPRETATION

Interim analyses suggest long-term efficacy and safety of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis who are intolerant to or inadequately responsive to ursodeoxycholic acid.

FUNDING

Intercept Pharmaceuticals.

Emerging novel treatments for autoimmune liver diseases

The etiology of autoimmune liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), still remains largely unknown and no therapeutic agents that are able to "cure" these diseases have been developed. Although corticosteroids for AIH and ursodeoxycholic acid for PBC have been shown to significantly improve liver transplantation (LT)-free survival and are recommended as first-line drugs, treatment strategies for patients who show incomplete response to these drugs have not yet been fully established. No drug is significantly associated with long LT-free survival in PSC patients. Nevertheless, with progress in genetics, immunology, and cellular biology, several new compounds or antibodies are expected to have an effect on autoimmune liver diseases and several drugs are under consideration for clinical use. Although most clinical trials have been carried out in the USA or Europe, some are, or will be, undertaken in Japan in the future. In this review, the current standard-of-care of autoimmune liver diseases will be summarized, together with emerging novel treatments relevant to clinical practice in Japan.