How are Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine dosed by gastroenterologists? Results of a survey of clinical practice

Effect of NUDT15 polymorphisms on early hematological safety of low-dose azathioprine in Chinese patients with pemphigus vulgaris: A prospective cohort study

Azathioprine (AZA) is the preferred immunosuppressant for treating pemphigus vulgaris (PV), with discontinuation mainly attributed to hematological adverse events (AE). Reportedly, nucleoside diphosphate‐linked moiety X‐type motif 15 (NUDT15) polymorphisms have been strongly associated with thiopurine‐induced leukopenia. To investigate hematological AE of low‐dose AZA based on NUDT15 genotypes among patients with PV, a prospective cohort study was conducted in patients with PV, followed‐up for the first 8 weeks after AZA administration. All patients were divided into wild homozygous and heterozygous NUDT15 groups. Both groups initiated AZA at low dose (50 mg/day) and continued with different dose‐escalating approaches. Bone marrow suppression was considered the principal outcome. Overall, 62 patients with PV were enrolled (48 in the wild homozygous NUDT15 group vs. 14 in the heterozygous NUDT15 group). Except for median maintenance doses of AZA, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, sex, white blood cells, neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, median final doses of corticosteroids (mg prednisone equivalent), pemphigus disease area index, and anti‐desmoglein 1/3 autoantibodies. In both groups, patients presented similar hematological AE and treatment responses after administration of different low‐dose AZA treatment strategies. Low‐dose AZA based on NUDT15 genotypes can reduce the risk of early hematological AE among patients with PV.

First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the main entities of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic remittent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence are on the rise worldwide, and the heterogeneity between patients and within individuals over time is striking. The progressive advance in our understanding of the etiopathogenesis coupled with an unprecedented increase in therapeutic options have changed the management towards evidence-based interventions by clinicians with patients. This guideline was stimulated and supported by the Emirates Gastroenterology and Hepatology Society following a systematic review and a Delphi consensus process that provided evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity, appropriate and timely use of different investigations, choice of appropriate therapy for induction and remission phase according to disease severity, and management of main complications.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

The use of oral corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel diseases in Italy: An IG-IBD survey

AIM

To evaluate how Italian gastroenterologists use corticosteroids in clinical practice for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All members of the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) were invited to fill in a web-based questionnaire.

RESULTS

131/448 (29.2%) members completed the survey. In mild-to-moderate UC and CD relapses, low-bioavailability steroids (LBS) are first-line therapy for 37% and 42% of clinicians, respectively. In case of failure, immediate step-up to biologics or immunosuppressants is considered by 23% and 29%. Regarding conventional corticosteroids (CCS), a fixed starting dose is prescribed by 50%, and a weight-based dose by 22%. Tapering is started after 7-10days by 41% and after 14days by 32%. The preferred tapering schedule is 5mg/week. In case of CCS failure, 47% switch to parenteral steroids before considering shifting to different drug classes. In case of symptoms recurrence during tapering, 14% re-increase the dose and try tapering again. Before prescribing steroids, 72% do not prescribe any specific evaluation whereas during treatment some evaluation is performed by 85%. Vitamin D and calcium supplements are routinely prescribed along with steroids by 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

Several discrepancies and some deviation from the available guidelines were recorded among Italian gastroenterologists regarding corticosteroids use in IBD patients.

Time to clinical response and remission for therapeutics in inflammatory bowel diseases: What should the clinician expect, what should patients be told?

An awareness of the expected time for therapies to induce symptomatic improvement and remission is necessary for determining the timing of follow-up, disease (re)assessment, and the duration to persist with therapies, yet this is seldom reported as an outcome in clinical trials. In this review, we explore the time to clinical response and remission of current therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as medication, patient and disease related factors that may influence the time to clinical response. It appears that the time to therapeutic response varies depending on the indication for therapy (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis). Agents with the most rapid time to clinical response included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, exclusive enteral nutrition, aminosalicylates and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy which will work in most patients within the first 2 mo. Vedolizumab, methotrexate and thiopurines had a longer time to clinical response and can take several months to achieve maximal efficacy. Factors affecting the time to clinical response of therapies included use of concomitant therapy, disease duration, smoking status, disease phenotype and advanced age. There appears to be marked variation in time to clinical response for therapies used in IBD which is further influenced by disease and patient related factors. Understanding the expected time to therapeutic response is integral to inform further decision making, maintain a patient-centered approach and ensure treatment is given an appropriate timeframe to achieve maximal benefit prior to cessation.

Expert clinical management of autoimmune hepatitis in the real world

BACKGROUND

High-quality data on the management of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are scarce. Despite published guidelines, management of AIH is still expert based rather than evidence based.

AIM

To survey expert hepatologists, asking each to describe their practices in the management of patients with AIH.

METHODS

A survey questionnaire was distributed to members of the International AIH Group. The questionnaire consisted of four clinical scenarios on different presentations of AIH.

RESULTS

Sixty surveys were sent, out of which 37 were returned. None reported budesonide as a first line induction agent for the acute presentation of AIH. Five (14%) participants reported using thiopurine S-methyltransferase measurements before commencement of thiopurine maintenance therapy. Thirteen (35%) routinely perform liver biopsy at 2 years of biochemical remission. If histological inflammatory activity is absent, four (11%) participants reduced azathioprine, whereas 10 (27%) attempted withdrawal altogether. Regarding the management of difficult-to-treat patients, mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line agent (n = ~450 in 28 centres), whereas tacrolimus (n = ~115 in 21 centres) and ciclosporin (n = ~112 in 18 centres) are less often reported. One centre reported considerable experience with infliximab, while rescue therapy with rituximab has been tried in seven centres.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in the management of patients with autoimmune hepatitis even among the most expert in the field. Although good quality evidence is lacking, there is considerable experience with second-line therapies. Future prospective studies should address these issues, so that we move from an expert- to an evidence- and personalised-based care in autoimmune hepatitis.

Azathioprine induction of tumors with microsatellite instability: risk evaluation using a mouse model

Mismatch-repair (MMR)-deficient cells show increased in vitro tolerance to thiopurines because they escape apoptosis resulting from MMR-dependent signaling of drug-induced DNA damage. Prolonged treatment with immunosuppressants including azathioprine (Aza), a thiopurine prodrug, has been suggested as a risk factor for the development of late onset leukemias/lymphomas displaying a microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype, the hallmark of a defective MMR system. We performed a dose effect study in mice to investigate the development of MSI lymphomas associated with long term Aza treatment. Over two years, Aza was administered to mice that were wild type, null or heterozygous for the MMR gene Msh2. Ciclosporin A, an immunosuppressant with an MMR-independent signaling, was also administered to Msh2^wt mice as controls. Survival, lymphoma incidence and MSI tumor phenotype were investigated. Msh2^+/− mice were found more tolerant than Msh2^wt mice to the cytotoxicity of Aza. In Msh2^+/− mice, Aza induced a high incidence of MSI lymphomas in a dose-dependent manner. In Msh2^wt mice, a substantial lifespan was only observed at the lowest Aza dose. It was associated with the development of lymphomas, one of which displayed the MSI phenotype, unlike the CsA-induced lymphomas. Our findings define Aza as a risk factor for an MSI-driven lymphomagenesis process.

Thiopurines in the Management of Crohn's Disease: Safety and Efficacy Profile in Patients with Normal TPMT Activity-A Retrospective Study

Background and Aims. Thiopurines are used in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) activity can guide thiopurine dosing to avoid adverse events. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of starting thiopurines at low dose versus full dose in patients with CD and normal TPMT. Methods. This was a single center retrospective study including adult CD patients with normal TPMT levels (≥25 nmol/hr/g Hgb) who were followed for 1 year. Patients started at full dose of azathioprine (2-2.5 mg/kg) or 6-mercaptopurine (1-1.5 mg/kg) were compared to patients started at low dose. Harvey-Bradshaw index, treatment failure, and drug-related adverse events were recorded. Results. Our study included 134 patients. Both groups had similar incidences of drug-related adverse events and discontinuation of therapy due to side effects. Fifty-six percent of all adverse events occurred within 31 days and 92% occurred within 3 months of therapy. Clinical response favored the full-dose group at 6 months (69% versus 27%, p = 0.0542). Conclusions. Our study indicates that it is safe to start patients on full-dose thiopurine when they have a normal TPMT given its very similar toxicity profile to patients started on low dose. This may also positively impact efficacy.

Use of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Consensus Statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

For decades, thiopurines have been the mainstay of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and will play an important role in the future. However, complex metabolism and various side effects limit the use of these potent drugs in clinical practice. The Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases developed a set of consensus statements with the aim of guiding clinicians on the appropriate use of thiopurines in the management of IBD.

METHODS

Sixteen statements were initially drafted by five committee members. The quality of evidence and classification of recommendation were assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The statements were then circulated to IBD experts in Korea for review, feedback, and then finalized and accepted by voting at the consensus meeting.

RESULTS

The consensus statements comprised four parts: (1) pre-treatment evaluation and management strategy, including value of thiopurine S-methyltransferase screening, dosing schedule, and novel biomarkers for predicting thiopurine-induced leukopenia; (2) treatment with thiopurines with regards to optimal duration of thiopurine treatment and long-term outcomes of combination therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factors; (3) safety of thiopurines, especially during pregnancy and lactation; and (4) monitoring side effects or efficacy of therapy using biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines are an effective treatment option for patients with IBD. Management decisions should be individualized according to the risk of relapse and adverse events.

Thiopurine monitoring in children with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

AIMS

The aim was to systematically review the evidence on the clinical usefulness of thiopurine metabolite and white blood count (WBC) monitoring in the assessment of clinical outcomes in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov were screened in adherence to the PRISMA statement by two independent reviewers for identification of eligible studies. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and large case series of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (<18 years) who underwent monitoring of thiopurine metabolites and/or WBC.

RESULTS

Fifteen papers were identified (n = 1026). None of the eligible studies were RCTs. High 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6TGN) concentrations were not consistently associated with leucopenia. Leucopenia was not associated with achievement of clinical remission. A positive but not consistent correlation between 6TGN and clinical remission was reported. Haematological toxicity could not be reliably assessed with 6TGN measurements only. A number of studies supported the use of high 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6MMPR) as an indicator of hepatotoxicity. Low thiopurine metabolite concentration may be indicative of non-compliance.

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine metabolite testing does not safely predict clinical outcome, but may facilitate toxicity surveillance and treatment optimization in poor responders. Current evidence favours the combination of thiopurine metabolite/WBC monitoring and clinic follow-up for prompt identification of haematologic/hepatic toxicity safe dose adjustment, and treatment modification in cases of suboptimal clinical outcome or non-compliance. Well designed RCTs for the identification of robust surrogate markers of thiopurine efficacy and toxicity are required.

How thiopurines are used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: an Italian survey

BACKGROUND

The ideal manner of thiopurine use in inflammatory bowel disease has not been defined. We aimed at investigating the attitudes of Italian gastroenterologists on thiopurine use.

METHODS

A web-based survey was performed among 295 gastroenterologists.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 surveys were completed. At baseline, thiopurine methyltransferase genotype and phenotype were not assessed by 87.1% and 97.1% of respondents, respectively. At treatment onset, 17.1% adopted full weight-calculated dose while 80.0% preferred escalating the dose. During treatment, 87.1% and 64.3% reduced the dose for myelo- and liver toxicity, respectively; 48.6% for increased pancreatic enzymes, 17.1% for fever, and 5.7% for arthralgia. A systematic shift from one thiopurine to the other was reported by 4.3% of respondents in case of failure, and by 5.7% for adverse effects. Forty-four gastroenterologists (62.9%) stopped thiopurine treatment after 5-7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Several discrepancies regarding the use of thiopurines in clinical practice were found, deviating from available guidelines. A more standardised attitude is needed in clinical practice.

Toward a personalized medicine approach to the management of inflammatory bowel disease

The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is evolving toward a personalized medicine-based model. Modern therapeutic algorithms that feature use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in combination with immunosuppressive are highly effective when initiated in high-risk patients early in the course of disease. Defined targets that guide intensification of therapy are critical interventions. In this model, therapy is optimized through appropriate pretreatment testing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and patient-based monitoring strategies. This review discusses the current application of personalized medicine to the management of IBD.

Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: Safety issues

Thiopurines are widely used for maintenance treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Inter-individual variability in clinical response to thiopurines may be attributed to several factors including genetic polymorphisms, severity and chronicity of disease, comorbidities, duration of administration, compliance issues and use of concomitant medication, environmental factors and clinician and patient preferences. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current evidence on thiopurine safety and toxicity, to describe adverse drug events and emphasise the significance of drug interactions, and to discuss the relative safety of thiopurine use in adults, elderly patients, children and pregnant women. Thiopurines are safe to use and well tolerated, however dose adjustment or discontinuation of treatment must be considered in cases of non-response, poor compliance or toxicity. Drug safety, clinical response to treatment and short to long term risks and benefits must be balanced throughout treatment duration for different categories of patients. Treatment should be individualised and stratified according to patient requirements. Enzymatic testing prior to treatment commencement is advised. Surveillance with regular clinic follow-up and monitoring of laboratory markers is important. Data on long term efficacy, safety of thiopurine use and interaction with other disease modifying drugs are lacking, especially in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. High quality, collaborative clinical research is required so as to inform clinical practice in the future.

Low-dose azathioprine is effective in maintaining remission among Chinese patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Azathiopurine (AZA) is efficacious for maintenance remission of Crohn's disease (CD) at the standard dose of 2.0-2.5 mg/kg for Caucasian. It has been reported that the lower dose (1.0-2.0 mg/kg) in some Asian countries was as effective as the standard dose. In the present study we analyzed the efficacy of <1.0 mg/kg AZA in maintaining remission for Chinese patients.

METHODS

The clinical data of all CD patients were reviewed from 1993 to December 2012. The patients who initiated AZA treatment and were followed for ≥ 2 years with complete medical data were included. We divided the patients into two groups according to their initial dose: <1.0 mg/kg group and 1.0-2.0 mg/kg group.

RESULTS

Among 77 patients, 39 (50.6%) started treatment with <1.0 mg/kg AZA and 38 (49.4%) with 1.0-2.0 mg/kg. The mean dose of <1.0 mg/kg group remained under 1.0 mg/kg at 6, 12 and 24 months, even if the doses were adjusted according to efficacy and tolerance. The remission rate in patients of <1.0 mg/kg group was significantly higher than that in those of 1.0-2.0 mg/kg group (P = 0.025). A dose of <1.0 mg/kg AZA was more commonly associated with male gender, older age, heavier body weight and L1 location. Adverse events were observed in 21 of 77 patients (27.3%) and no significant difference in occurrence of adverse events or leucopenia between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

<1.0 mg/kg AZA was effective as 1.0-2.0 mg/kg in maintaining remission among Chinese patients with CD.

The impact of introducing thioguanine nucleotide monitoring into an inflammatory bowel disease clinic

BACKGROUND

Thioguanine nucleotides (TGNs) are the active product of thiopurine metabolism. Levels have been correlated with effective clinical response. Nonetheless, the value of TGN monitoring in clinical practice is debated. We report the influence of introducing TGN monitoring into a large adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with IBD undergoing TGN monitoring were identified from Purine Research Laboratory records. Whole blood TGNs and methylated mercaptopurine nucleotides were hydrolysed to the base and measured using HPLC. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained retrospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients with 608 available TGN results were identified. In non-responders, TGNs directed treatment change in 39/53 patients. When treatment was changed as directed by TGN, 18/20 (90%) improved vs. 7/21 (33%) where the treatment decision was not TGN-directed, p < 0.001. Where treatment change was directed at optimisation of thiopurine therapy, 14/20 achieved steroid-free remission at 6 months vs. 3/10 where the TGN was ignored, (p = 0.037). Six per cent of patients were non-adherent, 25% under-dosed and 29% over-dosed by TGN. Twelve per cent of patients predominantly methylated thiopurines, this group had low TGN levels and high risk of hepatotoxicity. In responders, adherence and dosing issues were identified and TGN-guided dose-reduction was possible without precipitating relapse. Mean cell volume (MCV), white blood cell count (WBC) and lymphocyte counts were not adequate surrogate markers. MCV/WBC ratio correlated with clinical response, but was less useful than TGN for guiding clinical decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring TGNs enables thiopurine therapy to be optimised and individualised, guiding effective treatment decisions and improving clinical outcomes.

Thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: response predictors, safety, and withdrawal in follow-up

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thiopurines represent the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Since it is likely that response to therapy and adverse events depends on the genetic background of patients our study aimed to evaluate retrospectively response to therapy and safety in a mixed IBD population in Southern Europe.

METHODS

We evaluated demographic and clinical data of our patients treated with thiopurines. after 6 months in responders and non-responders to therapy. Moreover the likelihood to remain in thiopurine monotherapy was evaluated in responders, whereas adverse events were investigated in all patients.

RESULTS

Among disease- and patient-related parameters a shorter disease duration, female gender and ileal disease in Crohn's patients were associated with better response. By ROC analysis, the best predictors of response were decreasing values of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. In the long-term more than half of IBD patients who responded at 6 months remained on monotherapy at 42 months. Flu-like syndrome represented the most frequent adverse event followed by abnormalities of liver function tests and myelotoxicity. Adverse events did occur at any time and were frequently impredictable.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, thiopurines showed a good clinical efficacy, especially in patients with short duration of disease. Normalization of markers of systemic inflammation represents the most useful tool to assess response. Careful monitoring of patients is required during the whole duration of treatment although it may not prevent all severe complications.

Use of thiopurine testing in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases in clinical practice: a worldwide survey of experts

BACKGROUND

We performed a worldwide survey to evaluate the extent to which gastroenterologists who are experts in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are utilizing thiopurine metabolism in practice.

METHODS

This was a Web-based cross-sectional survey consisting of 12 multiple-choice and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Between December 2009 and April 2010, 175 questionnaires were received. The proportion of practitioners with access and reimbursement for thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype, TPMT phenotype, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) levels, and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMP) levels was 48%, 54%, 44%, and 35%, respectively. Before azathioprine initiation, TPMT genotype and phenotype were performed by only 30% and 43% of responders, respectively. In patients on thiopurine therapy, 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels were determined by 54% and 44% of responders, respectively. Only 27% of physicians always wait for TMPT activity/genotype results before initiating azathioprine and 81% do not routinely recheck metabolite levels after dose escalation or reduction. In cases of very high or low TPMT activity, 75% and 74% of practitioners take into account TMPT activity result, respectively. If access to all azathioprine metabolite measurements was available and if all these tests were reimbursed by public health insurance, 47% of responders would use these tests more often in their practice. The availability and reimbursement of TPMT status and azathioprine metabolites strongly influenced experts' attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurine testing is relatively underutilized by IBD gastroenterologists. The availability and reimbursement of TPMT status and azathioprine metabolites strongly influence the management of IBD patients treated with thiopurines.

How are thiopurines used and monitored by Swedish gastroenterologists when treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease?

OBJECTIVE

To perform a survey of thiopurine treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among Swedish gastroenterologists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A web-based questionnaire consisting of 25 multiple-choice questions was sent to 322 gastroenterologists in adult practice.

RESULTS

A total of 132 questionnaires were received giving a response rate of 41%. Thiopurines were used by all 122 gastroenterologists in IBD practice and azathioprine was the first-choice thiopurine among 118 (97%) of them. Almost all gastroenterologists (97%) used weight-based dosing that was gradually escalated. The vast majority (89%) considered that efficacy should be evaluated within 6 months of therapy, while opinions regarding the optimal duration of therapy varied considerably. It was seen that 74% switched thiopurine in case of intolerance to the first-line substance. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) determinations were performed by 74% of the gastroenterologists and 67% used metabolite measurements. TPMT analyzers were more likely to measure metabolites (74 vs. 43%, p = 0.002). A quarter of the respondents were familiar with unconventional immunomodulation (co-administration of allopurinol, 6-thioguanine, mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus) and these respondents were also more likely to measure metabolites (79 vs. 52%; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Thiopurines are well established in the treatment of IBD among Swedish gastroenterologists. New and evolving knowledge about thiopurine therapy in IBD has been adapted to a large extent. Whether this change in clinical practice will have an impact on treatment outcomes has yet to be proven.

Role of conventional therapies in the era of biological treatment in Crohn’s disease

Outstanding progress regarding the pathophysiology of Crohn’s disease (CD) has led to the development of innovative therapeutic concepts. Numerous controlled trials have been performed in CD. This review concentrates on the results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials, and meta-analyses when available, that provide the highest degree of evidence. Current guidelines on the management of CD recommend a step-up approach to treatment involving the addition of more powerful therapies as the severity of disease and refractoriness to therapy increase. The advent of biological drugs has opened new therapeutic horizons for treating CD, modifying the treatment goals. However, the large majority of patients with CD will be managed through conventional therapy, even if they are a prelude to biological therapy.

Azathioprine-induced carcinogenesis in mice according to Msh2 genotype

BACKGROUND

The thiopurine prodrug azathioprine is used extensively in cancer therapy. Exposure to this drug results in the selection of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cell clones in vitro. It has also been suggested that thiopurine drugs might constitute a risk factor for the emergence of human neoplasms displaying microsatellite instability (MSI) because of deficient DNA mismatch repair.

METHODS

Azathioprine was administered via drinking water (6-20 mg/kg body weight per day) to mice that were null (Msh2⁻(/)⁻; n = 27), heterozygous (Msh2(+/)⁻; n = 22), or wild type (Msh2(WT); n = 18) for the DNA mismatch repair gene Msh2. Control mice (45 Msh2⁻(/)⁻, 38 Msh2(+/)⁻, and 12 Msh2(WT)) received drinking water lacking azathioprine. The effect of azathioprine on tumorigenesis and survival of the mice was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves using log-rank and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests. Mouse tumor samples were characterized by histology and immunophenotyping, and their MSI status was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis of three noncoding microsatellite markers and by immunohistochemistry. Msh2 status of tumor samples was assessed by loss of heterozygosity analyses and sequencing after reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of the entire Msh2 coding sequence. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Most untreated Msh2(WT) and Msh2(+/)⁻ mice remained asymptomatic and alive at 250 days of age, whereas azathioprine-treated Msh2(WT) and Msh2(+/)⁻ mice developed lymphomas and died prematurely (median survival of 71 and 165 days of age, respectively). Azathioprine-treated Msh2(+/)⁻ mice developed diffuse lymphomas lacking Msh2 expression and displaying MSI due to somatic inactivation of the functional Msh2 allele by loss of heterozygosity or mutation. By contrast, azathioprine-treated Msh2(WT) mice displayed no obvious tumor phenotype, but histological examination showed microscopic splenic foci of neoplastic lymphoid cells that retained Msh2 expression and did not display MSI. Both untreated and azathioprine-treated Msh2⁻(/)⁻ mice had a reduced lifespan compared with untreated Msh2(WT) mice (median survival of 127 and 107 days of age, respectively) and developed lymphomas with MSI.

CONCLUSION

Azathioprine-induced carcinogenesis in mice depends on the number of functional copies of the Msh2 gene.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Debate exists regarding to whether thiopurine therapy is as effective in ulcerative colitis (UC) as it is in Crohn's disease.

AIM

To review systematically the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) in UC, and to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of AZA/MP for the induction or maintenance of UC clinical remission.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Evaluating AZA/MP for induction and/or maintenance of clinical remission of UC. Randomized-controlled-trials comparing AZA/MP with placebo/5-aminosalicylates were included in the meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic and manual. Study quality: Independently assessed by two reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

By 'intention-to-treat'.

RESULTS

Thirty noncontrolled studies (1632 patients) were included in the systematic review. Mean efficacy of AZA/MP was 65% for induction and 76% for maintenance of the remission. Seven controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis. (i) Induction of remission: four studies (89 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 73% vs. 64% in controls (OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 0.59-4.29). (ii) Maintenance of remission: six studies (124 AZA/MP-treated patients) showed mean efficacy of 60% vs. 37% in controls (OR = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.51-4.34). When only studies comparing AZA/MP vs. placebo were considered, OR was 2.59 (95% CI = 1.26-5.3), absolute risk reduction was 23% and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent one recurrence was 5.

CONCLUSION

Thiopurine drugs (AZA/MP) are more effective than placebo for the prevention of relapse in UC, with an NNT of 5 and an absolute risk reduction of 23%.

[Pharmacological and pharmacogenetic study of two immunomodulators: azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. Strategies for preventing complications]

Thiopurines are frequently used in gastroenterology for Crohn's disease or hemorrhagic rectocolitis. Their metabolism is regulated by a particular enzyme, thiopurine S-methyltransferase or TPMT. There are three ways to evaluate the effectiveness and the risk of side effects associated with this treatment. TPMT activity measurement or genotyping are recommended to decide for treatment, while metabolites determination is a used as marker of monitoring. Phenotypic approach (TPMT activity measurement or metabolites determination) requires delicate techniques and interindividual variations make the interpretation difficult. Genotyping is easier to interpret but cannot exclude some risk of side effects.

Therapy of ulcerative colitis: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in conventional therapy, novel targets and therapeutic goals are the highlights of treatment for ulcerative colitis in the last year. There have also been disappointments. This review summarizes the highs and lows, with an emphasis on strategy as opposed to seeking the newest treatment option.

RECENT FINDINGS

In conventional therapy, once daily therapy for 5-aminosalicylic acid is generally sufficient. Furthermore, a new 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine MMX) has been released that effectively induces and maintains remission. There have been reappraisals of immunomodulators and further evaluation of (yes, now conventional!) infliximab for ulcerative colitis. Opportunistic infections, long-term outcomes and the burden of disease are being characterized. New therapeutic targets included an antibody against T cells (anti-CD3), but trials on visilizumab for acute severe colitis have been suspended. T-cell costimulation, phosphatidylcholine to promote barrier function, new anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, B-cell (anti-CD20) depletion and complementary therapies represent new therapeutic horizons. International agreement is needed on activity indices, definitions of remission, therapeutic goals (including mucosal healing) and outcomes that matter to patients, so that trials can be compared.

SUMMARY

Advances will take time to alter mainstream practice, but 2007-2008 is the year of organized strategies, with European, American and British guidelines on ulcerative colitis published or in press. These should be the platform for better outcomes for patients.