Hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor in a French cohort: Clinical characteristics and response to treatment with icatibant

Targeting factor XIIa for therapeutic interference with hereditary angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of swelling. Local vasodilation and vascular leakage are stimulated by the vasoactive peptide bradykinin, which is excessively produced due to dysregulation of the activated factor XII (FXIIa)-driven kallikrein-kinin system. There is a need for novel treatments for HAE that provide greater efficacy, improved quality of life, minimal adverse effects, and reduced treatment burden over current first-line therapies. FXIIa is emerging as an attractive therapeutic target for interference with HAE attacks. In this review, we draw on preclinical, experimental animal, and in vitro studies, providing an overview on targeting FXIIa as the basis for pharmacologic interference in HAE. We highlight that there is a range of FXIIa inhibitors in development for different therapeutic areas. Of these, garadacimab, an FXIIa-targeted inhibitory monoclonal antibody, is the most advanced and has shown potential as a novel long-term prophylactic treatment for patients with HAE in clinical trials. The evidence from these trials is summarized and discussed, and we propose areas for future research where targeting FXIIa may have therapeutic potential beyond HAE.

Real-world outcomes of patients with hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor function and patients with idiopathic angioedema of unknown etiology in Canada

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor function (HAE nC1-INH) and idiopathic angioedema of unknown etiology (AE-UNK) are rare conditions that cause recurrent subcutaneous and submucosal swelling. The characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with these conditions in Canada have not been studied.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to extract real-world evidence from the electronic health records of patients with HAE nC1-INH or AE-UNK who were managed in selected practices of Canadian HAE-treating specialist physicians between 01-Jan-2012 and 01-Jan-2022, to examine case numbers, treatment, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients (37 with HAE nC1-INH, 23 with AE-UNK), median (range) age at symptom onset was 21.5 (5.0-57.0) and 23.0 (10.0-54.0) years, respectively. Time to diagnosis from onset of symptoms was 7.0 (0.0-43.0) and 2.0 (- 10.0 to 50.0) years. Significant differences were observed in terms of the predominant triggers for angioedema attacks between patients with HAE nC1-INH and AE-UNK: stress (65% vs. 26%, p = 0.007) and estrogen therapy (35% vs. 9%, p = 0.031). Before diagnosis, most patients received antihistamines (50% of HAE nC1-INH and 61% of AE-UNK patients). Post-diagnosis, 73% and 74% of HAE nC1-INH and AE-UNK patients received long-term prophylaxis (LTP), with the most common LTP treatments being subcutaneous pdC1-INH (43% of HAE nC1-INH patients and 39% of AE-UNK patients) and tranexamic acid (41% of HAE nC1-INH patients and 35% of AE-UNK patients). Of patients with HAE nC1-INH, and patients with AE-UNK, 22% and 13%, respectively, were taking more than one LTP treatment concurrently. Before HAE treatment initiation, significantly fewer patients with AE-UNK compared to patients with HAE nC1-INH had angioedema attacks affecting their extremities (13% vs. 38%, p = 0.045) and GI system (22% vs. 57%, p = 0.015). In the three months following treatment initiation, patients with AE-UNK experienced significantly fewer angioedema attacks compared to patients with HAE nC1-INH (median 2.0 attacks [0.0-48.0] vs. 6.0 attacks [0.0-60.0], p = 0.044). Additionally, fewer patients with AE-UNK compared to HAE nC1-INH experienced attacks affecting their GI system (26% vs. 57%, p = 0.032). Attack duration and frequency significantly decreased for patients with HAE nC1-INH from a median of 1.00 day (range: 0.00-7.00) to 0.29 day (range: 0.02-4.00; p = 0.001) and from 10.50 attacks (range: 0.00-90.00) to 6.00 attacks (range: 0.00-60.00; p = 0.004) in the three months following HAE treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Canadian real-world evidence, these data demonstrate differing clinical trajectories between patients with HAE nC1-INH and AE-UNK, including diagnostic delays, varied attack characteristics, treatment responses and healthcare utilization. Despite treatment response, many patients still experienced frequent angioedema attacks. These results suggest an unmet need for treatment guidelines and therapies specifically for patients with HAE nC1-INH and AE-UNK and better understanding of the pathophysiology accounting for the reported differences between the two.

Hereditary angioedema with normal C1 esterase inhibitor: Current paradigms and clinical dilemmas

Background: A diagnosis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (HAE-nl-C1-INH) can be challenging and pharmacologic management is not well defined. Objective: The objective was to discuss practical considerations in the clinical management of HAE-nl-C1-INH by using illustrative clinical vignettes to highlight and/or address select challenges. Methods: This was a narrative review. Results: Symptoms of HAE-nl-C1-INH overlap with HAE types I and II; the heterogeneity of presentation and symptom burden are diagnostic challenges. A patient history, with particular attention to whether urticaria or other symptoms of mast cell mediator release are present, is important because such symptoms would strongly suggest a mast cell-mediated pathway. A family history of angioedema is informative but a lack thereof does not rule out diagnosis. Expected laboratory findings would be normal for C4, C1-INH level and function, and Complement 1q; a genetic mutational analysis may be helpful, but current assays do not include all known mutations; most cases are categorized as unknown. To align with guideline-directed treatment approaches, the following stepwise approach is suggested for suspected HAE-nl-C1-INH: (1) thoroughly investigate the possibility of response to histaminergic and/or mast cell-targeting treatments; (2) if patients with normal C4, C1-INH level and/or function fail adequate trials with histamine/mast cell-directed therapy or have a mutation that suggests bradykinin pathway involvement, follow HAE type I and II treatment guidelines. Response to medications approved for HAE types I/II provides compelling support for a high clinical suspicion of HAE-nl-C1-INH. De-labeling an HAE-nl-C1-INH diagnosis may be appropriate if the initial diagnosis was made without adequate evaluation or if new information and/or testing indicates that the patient does not actually have HAE. Conclusion: Key unmet needs in HAE-nl-C1-INH include lack of confirmatory biomarker(s) for diagnosis and lack of prospective controlled clinical studies of pharmacologic products in this patient population.

Hereditary or acquired? Comprehensive genetic testing assists in stratifying angioedema patients

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) poses diagnostic challenges due to its episodic, non-specific symptoms and overlapping conditions. This study focuses on the genetic basis of HAE, particularly focusing on unresolved cases and those with normal C1-inhibitor levels (nC1-INH HAE). This study reveals that conventional testing identified pathogenic variants in only 10 patients (n = 32), emphasizing the necessity for an integrative approach using genome, exome, and transcriptome sequencing. Despite extensive genetic analyses, the diagnostic yield for nC1-INH HAE remains low in our study, the pathogenic variant for nC1-INH HAE was identified in only 1 patient (n = 21). Investigation into candidate genes yielded no pathogenic variants, prompting a re-evaluation of patients' diagnoses. This study advocates for a nuanced approach to genetic testing, recognizing its limitations and emphasizing the need for continuous clinical assessment. The complex genetic landscape of nC1-INH HAE necessitates further research for a more comprehensive understanding. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into the genetic intricacies of HAE, highlighting the challenges in diagnosis and the evolving nature of the disease. The findings underscore the importance of advanced sequencing techniques and an integrated diagnostic strategy in unravelling the complexities of HAE, particularly in nС1-INH HAE cases.

Clinical Experience with Berotralstat in Patients with Hereditary Angioedema with Normal C1-Esterase Inhibitor: A Commented Case Series

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by potentially life-threatening episodes of swelling. Most HAE cases are caused by deficient (type I) or dysfunctional (type II) C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein. However, some patients present with a subtype of HAE that is associated with normal plasma levels of functional C1-INH protein and complement component 4 (HAE-nC1INH). Treatment of HAE-nC1INH is driven by clinical experience as robust clinical trial data to inform treatment decisions are lacking in this population. This retrospective case series assessed clinical features and treatment outcomes in 15 patients with HAE-nC1INH who initiated long-term prophylaxis with oral berotralstat 150 mg once daily as part of their disease management pathway. Most patients were female (93%), with a median age of 49 years. All patients experienced abdominal swelling attacks. On average, patients tried a mean of 4 different treatments for their HAE, including berotralstat. Although most patients associated prophylactic and on-demand medications that target the bradykinin pathway with improvements in the frequency and/or severity of attacks, treatment outcomes varied considerably between patients, highlighting the importance of a personalized approach to disease management. In this case series, berotralstat was an effective prophylactic treatment option in most patients with HAE-nC1INH. Further studies are required to demonstrate the potential efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of currently approved HAE therapies in patients with HAE-nC1INH.

Managing Diagnosis, Treatment, and Burden of Disease in Hereditary Angioedema Patients with Normal C1-Esterase Inhibitor

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, chronic, and debilitating genetic disorder characterized by recurrent and unpredictable swelling episodes that primarily affect the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissues of the extremities, larynx, face, abdomen, and genitals. Most cases of HAE are caused by mutations in the serpin family G member 1 gene (SERPING1), which encodes C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein. Mutations in SERPING1 lead to deficient (type I HAE-C1-INH) or dysfunctional (type II HAE-C1-INH) C1-INH protein and subsequent dysregulation of the kallikrein-bradykinin cascade. However, some patients present with a third type of HAE (HAE-nI-C1-INH), which was first described in the year 2000 and is characterized by an absence of mutations in SERPING1. Although mutations in the coagulation factor XII, angiopoietin-1, plasminogen, kininogen-1, myoferlin, and heparan sulfate-glucosamine 3-O-sulfotransferase-6 genes have been identified in some patients with HAE-nI-C1-INH, genetic cause is still unknown in many cases, hindering full elucidation of the pathology of this HAE subtype. Diagnosis of HAE-nI-C1-INH is also further complicated by the fact that patients typically demonstrate normal plasma levels of C1-INH and complement component 4 protein and normal C1-INH functionality during laboratory analysis. Therefore, we review the challenges associated with diagnosing, treating, and living with HAE-nI-C1-INH. We conclude that raising awareness of the presenting features of HAE-nI-C1-INH within the clinical setting and among the general public is critical to aid earlier suspicion and diagnosis of the disease. Furthermore, adopting an individualized approach to HAE-nI-C1-INH treatment is essential to help address the current and significant unmet needs in this patient population.

The Icatibant Outcome Survey: 10 years of experience with icatibant for patients with hereditary angioedema

In patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE), bradykinin causes swelling episodes by activating bradykinin B₂ receptors. Icatibant, a selective bradykinin B₂ receptor antagonist, is approved for on-demand treatment of HAE attacks. The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) is an ongoing observational registry initiated in 2009 to monitor effectiveness/safety of icatibant in routine clinical practice. As of March 2019, 549 patients with HAE type 1 or 2 from the IOS registry had been treated, for 5995 total attacks. This article reviews data published from IOS over time which have demonstrated that effectiveness of icatibant in a real-world setting is comparable to efficacy in clinical trials; one dose is effective for the majority of attacks; early treatment (facilitated by self-administration) leads to faster resolution and shorter attack duration; effectiveness/safety of icatibant has been shown across a broad range of patient subgroups, including children/adolescents and patients with HAE with normal C1 inhibitor levels; and tolerability has been demonstrated in patients aged ≥65 years. Additionally, this review highlights how IOS data have provided valuable insights into patients' diagnostic journeys and treatment behaviors across individual countries. Such findings have helped to inform clinical strategies and guidelines to optimize HAE management and limit disease burden. This research was sponsored by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., provided funding to Excel Medical Affairs for support in writing and editing this manuscript.

Icatibant use in Brazilian patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) type 1 or 2 and HAE with normal C1-INH levels: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema can be caused by C1-Inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency and/or dysfunction (HAE-1/2) or can occur in patients with normal C1-INH (HAE nC1-INH).

METHODS

The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) registry monitors the safety and effectiveness of icatibant for treating acute angioedema.

OBJECTIVE

Present findings from Brazilian patients with HAE-1/2 and HAE nC1-INH participating in IOS.

RESULTS

42 patients were enrolled (HAE-1/2, n = 26; HAE nC1-INH, n = 16). Median age at symptom onset was significantly lower with HAE-1/2 vs. HAE nC1-INH (10.0 vs. 16.5y, respectively; p = 0.0105), whereas median age at diagnosis (31.1 vs. 40.9y; p = 0.1276) and the median time between symptom onset and diagnosis (15.0 vs. 23.8y; p = 0.6680) were numerically lower vs. HAE nC1-INH, respectively. One icatibant dose was used for > 95% of HAE attacks. Median (range) time-to-event outcomes were shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2, including time to first administration (0.5 [0-96.0] vs. 1.0 [0-94.0]h, respectively), time from first administration to complete resolution (1.0 [0-88.0] vs. 5.5 [0-96.0]h, respectively), and total attack duration (7.0 [0.3-99.0] vs. 18.5 [0.1-100.0]h, respectively). Mean (SD) time from attack onset to resolution was significantly shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2 (9.8 [18.7] vs. 19.6 [24.0]h, respectively; p = 0.0174). 83 adverse events (AEs) in 42 patients were reported; most were mild (66.3%) or moderate (13.3%) and non-serious (75.9%). The most common icatibant-related AE was injection site erythema (HAE-1/2, 34.6%; HAE nC1-INH, 18.8%).

STUDY LIMITATIONS

This was an observational study without a treatment comparator and that relied on patient recall.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate effectiveness and tolerability of icatibant in Brazilian HAE patients.

Clinical profile and treatment outcomes in patients with hereditary angioedema with normal C1 esterase inhibitor

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is often caused by low serum levels or functional deficiency in C1 inhibitor (C1-INH); however, in some cases, C1-INH serum level and function are measured as normal (HAE-nl-C1INH). Management of HAE-nl-C1INH is similar to management of HAE with C1-INH deficiency, including on-demand therapy for angioedema attacks and, potentially, prophylaxis. Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1-INH) is indicated for treatment of acute HAE attacks. This study assessed the clinical profile and treatment outcomes in an HAE-nl-C1INH population with a history of rhC1-INH treatment.

Methods

Medical records containing patient-reported outcomes from ten US treatment centers were analyzed retrospectively for medical history, angioedema attack characteristics, attack treatments, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Twenty-three patients were included, with wide US geographic representation. Most patients (87.0%) were female; median age was 36.0 years (range, 19–67 years). Of 20 patients with available data, 4 had their first angioedema attack during childhood (aged <12 years), 3 during adolescence (aged 12–17 years), and 13 during adulthood (aged 18–29 years, n = 7; aged ≥30 years, n = 6). Median age at HAE-nl-C1INH diagnosis was 31.5 years (range, 9–59 years). Previous failed treatments included high-dose antihistamines (n = 20) and corticosteroids (n = 20). Use of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved HAE therapy positively impacted patient-reported assessments of angioedema attacks. Most patients were taking rhC1-INH or lanadelumab as prophylaxis and icatibant or rhC1-INH for acute management. Most patients reported improved disease control with these therapies, including reductions in angioedema attack frequency and severity. Although most patients were receiving prophylactic therapy, availability of treatment for breakthrough attacks was important.

Conclusion

Findings from this retrospective study support use of FDA-approved HAE medications for prophylaxis and acute treatment of HAE attacks in patients with HAE-nl-C1INH. Individualized HAE treatment regimens were needed to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Management of hereditary angioedema in Japan: Focus on icatibant for the treatment of acute attacks

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by unpredictable, recurring and painful swelling episodes that can be disabling or even life-threatening. Awareness of HAE has progressively grown worldwide, and options for treatment of acute attacks and prevention of future attacks continue to expand; however, unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment remain. In Japan, recognition of HAE within the medical community remains low, and numerous obstacles complicate diagnosis and access to treatment. Importance of timely treatment of HAE attacks with on-demand therapies is continually demonstrated; recommended agents per the WAO/EAACI treatment guidelines published in 2018 include C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate, ecallantide, and icatibant. In Japan, multiple factors contribute to delayed HAE treatment (potentially leading to life-threatening consequences), including difficulties in finding facilities at which C1-INH agents are readily available. Recognition of challenges faced in Japan can help promote efforts to address current needs and expand access to effective therapies. Icatibant, a potent, selective bradykinin B₂ receptor antagonist, has demonstrated inhibition of various bradykinin-induced biological effects in preclinical studies and has shown efficacy in treating attacks in various clinical settings (e.g. clinical trials, real-world studies), and HAE patient populations (e.g. with C1-INH deficiency, normal C1-INH). Icatibant was approved in Japan for the treatment of HAE attacks in September 2018; its addition to the HAE treatment armamentarium contributes to improved patient care. In Japan, disease awareness and education campaigns are warranted to further advance the management of HAE patients in light of the unmet needs and the emerging availability of modern diagnostic approaches and therapies.

[Diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor level]

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with normal C1-inhibitor level is a rare potentially life-threatening disorder with autosomal dominant inheritance which was first described in 2000. Its clinical presentation is similar to HAE with C1-deficiency. The review is summarized data about its prevalence, mechanisms, genetics and diagnostic criteria. Different subtypes and treatment options (on demand, short term and long-term prophylaxis) are discussed. We describe family clinical cases of 2 female patients with normal C1-inhibitor and plasminogen gene mutation. Their features were late diagnosis (in 10 and 25 years after the onset of symptoms), family history (similar genetic mutation in 3 female members of the same family, including 1-asymtomatic) and combination of face, tongue, larynx and abdominal angioedema in patient and her sibling.

Review of icatibant use in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

BACKGROUND

This is a retrospective review of the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority's (WRHA) angioedema patients who were dispensed icatibant in hospital. Icatibant is a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist indicated for Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) types I and II and is used off-label for HAE with normal C1INH (HAE-nC1INH) and ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema (ACEIIAE). The WRHA's use of icatibant is regulated by the Allergist on call. We characterized icatibant's use and the timeline from patient presentation, compared the real-world experience with the FAST-3 trial and hypothesized the factors which may affect response to icatibant.

METHODS

Background data were collected on patients. Angioedema attack-related data included administered medications, performed investigations and the timeline to endpoints such as onset of symptom relief. Data was analyzed in R with the package "survival." Time-to-event data was analyzed using the Peto-Peto Prentice method or Mann-Whitney U-test. Data was also compared with published clinical trial data using the Sign Test. Fisher's Exact Test was used to produce descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 patients accounted for 23 angioedema attacks treated with icatibant. Approximately half the patients had a diagnosis of HAE-nC1IHN and half of ACEIIAE. Of those presenting with angioedema, 65% were first treated with conventional medication. Patients without a prior angioedema diagnosis were evaluated only 40-50% of the time for C4 levels or C1INH function or level. The median time from patients' arrival to the emergency department until the Allergy consultant's response was 1.77 h. Patients with HAE-nC1IHN had median times to onset of symptom relief and final clinical outcome (1.13 h, p = 0.34; 3.50 h, p = 0.11) similar to those reported in FAST-3 for HAE I/II. Patients with ACEIIAE had longer median times to onset of symptom relief (4.86 h, p = 0.01) than predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

HAE-nC1INH may be an appropriate indication for treatment with icatibant. Conversely, the results of this study do not support the use of icatibant for the treatment of ACEIIAE, concordant with a growing body of literature. Patients should be stratified into groups of more- or less-likely icatibant-responders through history and laboratory investigations in order to prevent potential delays.

Hereditary angioedema: On-demand treatment of angioedema attacks

The availability of effective acute treatment for angioedema has been fundamental in reducing the burden of illness for patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). In building on the foundation of scientific advances that elucidate the pathomechanism(s) of attacks related to vascular permeability, novel targeted on-demand treatments have been developed and approved. These therapies have provided the means to arrest episodes of swelling, which, in the past, had the potential to inexorably lead to morbidity, and even mortality, for patients with HAE. Access to these medications, along with an emphasis on early administration and guidance that all attacks are candidates for treatment, has shifted the management paradigm for HAE. Although unmet needs remain, these acute therapies, coupled with advances in prophylactic treatment, have furthered the goal for all patients with HAE to live a normal life.

US HAEA Medical Advisory Board 2020 Guidelines for the Management of Hereditary Angioedema

Scientific and clinical progress together with the development of effective novel therapeutic options has engendered multiple important changes in the diagnosis and management of hereditary angioedema (HAE). We now update and extend the 2013 United States Hereditary Angioedema Association Medical Advisory Board guidelines for the treatment and management of HAE. The guidelines are based on a comprehensive literature review with recommendations indicating both the strength of our recommendation and the quality of the underlying evidence. Guidelines are provided regarding the classification, diagnosis, on-demand treatment, prophylactic treatment, special considerations for women and children, development of a comprehensive management and monitoring plan, and assessment of burden of illness for both HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency and HAE with normal C1 inhibitor. Advances in HAE treatment now allow the development of management plans that can help many patients with HAE lead a normal life. Achieving this goal requires that physicians be familiar with the diagnostic and therapeutic transformations that have occurred in recent years.

In Vitro Pharmacological Profile of a New Small Molecule Bradykinin B2 Receptor Antagonist

We here report the discovery and early characterization of Compound 3, a representative of a novel class of small molecule bradykinin (BK) B₂ receptor antagonists, and its superior profile to the prior art B₂ receptor antagonists Compound 1 and Compound 2. Compound 3, Compound 2, and Compound 1 are highly potent antagonists of the human recombinant B₂ receptor (K_b values 0.24, 0.95, and 1.24 nM, respectively, calcium mobilization assay). Compound 3 is more potent than the prior art compounds and icatibant in this assay (K_b icatibant 2.81 nM). The compounds also potently inhibit BK-induced contraction of endogenous B₂ receptors in a human isolated umbilical vein bioassay. The potencies of Compound 3, Compound 2, Compound 1, and icatibant are (pA₂ values) 9.67, 9.02, 8.58, and 8.06 (i.e. 0.21, 0.95, 2.63, and 8.71 nM), respectively. Compound 3 and Compound 2 were further characterized. They inhibit BK-induced c-Fos signaling and internalization of recombinant human B₂ receptors in HEK293 cells, and do not antagonize the venous effects mediated by other G protein-coupled receptors in the umbilical vein model, including the bradykinin B₁ receptor. Antagonist potency of Compound 3 at cloned cynomolgus monkey, dog, rat, and mouse B₂ receptors revealed species selectivity, with a high antagonist potency for human and monkey B₂ receptors, but several hundred-fold lower potency for the other B₂ receptors. The in vitro off-target profile of Compound 3 demonstrates a high degree of selectivity over a wide range of molecular targets, including the bradykinin B₁ receptor. Compound 3 showed a lower intrinsic clearance in the microsomal stability assay than the prior art compounds. With an efflux ratio of 1.0 in the Caco-2 permeability assay Compound 3 is predicted to be not a substrate of efflux pumps. In conclusion, we discovered a novel chemical class of highly selective and very potent B₂ receptor antagonists, as exemplified by Compound 3. The compound showed excellent absorption in the Caco-2 assay, predictive of good oral bioavailability, and favourable metabolic stability in liver microsomes. Compound 3 has provided a significant stepping stone towards the discovery of the orally bioavailable B₂ antagonist PHA-022121, currently in phase 1 clinical development.

Impaired control of the contact system in hereditary angioedema with normal C1-inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) comprises HAE with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) and HAE with normal C1-INH activity (nl-C1-INH-HAE), due to mutations in factor XII (FXII-HAE), plasminogen (PLG-HAE), angiopoietin 1 (ANGPT1-HAE), kininogen 1 genes (KNG1-HAE), or angioedema of unknown origin (U-HAE). The Italian network for C1-INH-HAE (ITACA) created a registry including different forms of angioedema without wheals.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed clinical and laboratory features of a cohort of Italian subjects with nl-C1-INH-HAE followed by ITACA to identify specific biomarkers.

METHODS

A total of 105 nl-C1-INH-HAE patients were studied. Plasma concentrations of cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen (cHK), vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), angiopoietins (Angs), and secreted phospholipase A2 enzymes (sPLA2 ) were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 43 FXII-HAE patients, 58 U-HAE, and 4 ANGPT1-HAE. We assessed a prevalence of 1:1.4 × 106 for FXII-HAE and 1:1.0 × 106 for U-HAE. cHK levels in U-HAE patients were similar to controls in plasma collected using protease inhibitors cocktail (PIC), but they significantly increased in the absence of PIC. In FXII-HAE patients, cHK levels, in the absence of PIC, were significantly higher than in controls. We found a significant increase of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and Ang1 levels in U-HAE patients compared to controls. In FXII-HAE, only VEGF-C levels were increased. Ang2 concentrations and sPLA2 activity were not modified. The levels of these mediators in ANGPT1-HAE patients were not altered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that pathogenesis of FXII-, ANGPT1-, and U-HAE moves through an unbalanced control of kallikrein activity, with bradykinin as most likely mediator. VEGFs and Ang1 participate in the pathophysiology of U-HAE increasing the basal vascular permeability.

[Use of simulation in healthcare for therapeutic training of the parents of children with hereditary angioedema]

BACKGROUND

C1INH-deficiency hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent episodes of potentially severe oedema. Icatibant for SC injection will soon be approved for use in children and it is necessary to train parents in recognising severe episodes of AOH and in the technique for injection of icatibant. Simulation in healthcare (SH) is a set of educational methods for improving skills in a safe environment. We wished to assess the feasibility of a therapeutic training session (TTS) involving scripted scenarios for the parents of children with HAE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The TTS session included pre- and post-training testing on AOH, two scenarios (calling emergency services for lingual AO; gastrointestinal AO) involving actors and a volunteer parent, a workshop for learning the SC injection technique, and a satisfaction questionnaire. We analysed the answers on the questionnaire and noted down parents' verbatim observations during debriefing sessions.

RESULTS

Eight parents from 5 families took part in this session. Parents rated their overall satisfaction as 9.3/10. The parents commented that during the simulations, they felt "in the thick of it" and that they "experienced stress while viewing the scenes", thus attesting to the realism and relevance of the simulated scenarios.

DISCUSSION

This session met the parents' expectations in terms of being able to cope and having adequate know-how, based on both the simulations and the level of knowledge acquired. The main limitation lay in the parents' difficulty in confronting certain situations reminiscent of traumatic past experiences. TTS shares many common features with SH for the parents of sick children. The place of the latter in TTS must be evaluated.

Genetic Variation of Kallikrein-Kinin System and Related Genes in Patients With Hereditary Angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by C1-INH deficiency due to mutations in SERPING1 (C1-INH-HAE) in most of the cases, or by specific mutations in factor XII gene, F12 (F12-HAE). Identification of polymorphisms in the genes encoding proteins from key pathways driving HAE can help to understand how genetic diversity contributes to its phenotypic variability. Here, 15 genes related to the Kallikrein-Kinin System (KKS) were analyzed by next generation sequencing in 59 patients with C1-INH-HAE or F12-HAE from Brazil, Denmark and Spain, and 19 healthy relatives in a total of 31 families. We identified 211 variants, from which 23 occurred only in Danish subjects and 79 were found only in Brazilian individuals, resulting in 109/211 variations in common between European and Brazilian population in the HAE families analyzed. BDKRB2 and CPM presented a large number of variants in untranslated regions, 46/49 and 19/24, respectively; whereas ACE (n = 26), SERPING1 (n = 26), CPM (n = 24), and NOS3 (n = 16) genes presented the higher number of variants directly affecting amino acid sequence. Despite the large amount of variants identified, the lack of association between genotype and phenotype indicates that the modulation of HAE symptom requires a more complex regulation, probably involving pathways beyond the KKS, epigenetics and environmental factors. Considering the new HAE types recently described, molecules involved in the regulation of vasculature and in plasminogen activation become promising targets for future genetic studies.

Extremely Delayed Diagnosis of Type II Hereditary Angioedema: Case Report and Review of the Literature

We present a case with extremely late diagnosis of type II hereditary angioedema (HAE). Given recent advances in HAE treatment, we want to bring physician awareness to this condition and aid in earlier detection. HAE is a disorder associated with episodes of angioedema of the face, larynx, lips, abdomen, or extremities. Late diagnosis of HAE can lead to significant morbidity and is severely impairing due to recurring attacks. The diagnosis of HAE is ordinarily made during childhood and adolescence. Delayed diagnoses in early and middle adulthood have been documented in the literature. Gastrointestinal symptoms are common features of HAE and can be misdiagnosed as disease of primary gastrointestinal pathology, such as irritable bowel syndrome, recurrent pancreatitis, or appendicitis. These attacks are characterized by recurrent attacks of subcutaneous and submucosal edema without the presence of urticaria.We present a case of an elderly veteran whose diagnoses was extremely delayed into the eighth decade of life subsequent to unexplained abdominal symptoms. After diagnosis, the patient's symptoms were well controlled with medication due to advances in HAE treatment. To prevent further atypically delayed diagnoses, physicians should consider HAE in patients with recurrent attacks of unexplained abdominal pain.

Efficacy of Treatment of Non-hereditary Angioedema

Non-hereditary angioedema (AE) with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) can be presumably bradykinin- or mast cell-mediated, or of unknown cause. In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to provide an overview of the efficacy of different treatment options for the abovementioned subtypes of refractory non-hereditary AE with or without wheals and with normal C1INH. After study selection and risk of bias assessment, 61 articles were included for data extraction and analysis. Therapies were described for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced AE (ACEi-AE), for idiopathic AE, and for AE with wheals. Described treatments consisted of ecallantide, icatibant, C1INH, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), tranexamic acid (TA), and omalizumab. Additionally, individual studies for anti-vitamin K, progestin, and methotrexate were found. Safety information was available in 26 articles. Most therapies were used off-label and in few patients. There is a need for additional studies with a high level of evidence. In conclusion, in acute attacks of ACEi-AE and idiopathic AE, treatment with icatibant, C1INH, TA, and FFP often leads to symptom relief within 2 h, with limited side effects. For prophylactic treatment of idiopathic AE and AE with wheals, omalizumab, TA, and C1INH were effective and safe in the majority of patients.