Lack of beta-tubulin gene mutations in early stage lung cancer

Cellular mechanisms of resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes in cancer: intrinsic and acquired

Taxanes and anthracyclines are two of the most potent and broadly effective classes of chemotherapeutic agents. However, resistance to these agents is common and significantly limits their potential. As such, there is a great need to understand the mechanisms underlying de novo and acquired resistance to these agents. Beyond the resistance barrier lies even greater potential to significantly alter the natural course of human cancer. This review discusses what we currently understand about the mechanisms of resistance to taxanes and anthracyclines. Preclinical models suggest a role for ATP-binding cassette transporters, tubulin isoforms, microtubule-associated proteins, tubulin gene mutations, and mitotic checkpoint signaling proteins in resistance to taxanes. Preclinical models also suggest that drug transport proteins, antioxidant defenses, apoptotic signaling, and topoisomerase modulation may mediate anthracycline resistance. Many of these hypotheses remain untested in appropriately designed clinical studies, but limited clinical evidence will be reviewed. Epothilones represent a novel class of non-taxane microtubule stabilizing agents with distinct drug-resistance profiles. Potential mechanisms behind these differences and their potential role in the treatment of both taxane- and anthracycline-refractory patients are discussed.

Strategies for the development of novel Taxol-like agents

Taxol, the first microtubule stabilizer identified, is one of the most important new anticancer drugs to be brought to the clinic in the past 20 yr. The clinical success of TaxolTM led to the development of a second-generation taxane, docetaxel (Taxotere), and multiple third-generation taxane derivatives are under development. Non-taxane microtubule-stabilizers of diverse chemical structures, including the epothilones and discodermolide, show promising preclinical activities and several epothilones are progressing through clinical trials. One important advantage of the new stabilizers is their ability to circumvent drug resistance mechanisms. The clinical development of these new classes of agents suggests that microtubule stabilizers will continue to be important drugs for the treatment of cancer. This chapter provides a brief history of Taxol and the discovery and development status of other classes of microtubule stabilizers. Although all microtubule-stabilizers share similar mechanisms of action, interesting subtle differences among the stabilizers are being detected. This chapter also provides some strategies for identifying the differences among microtubule stabilizers that may help prioritize them for development and clinical use.

Preclinical Pharmacologic Evaluation of MST-997, an Orally Active Taxane with SuperiorIn vitroandIn vivoEfficacy in Paclitaxel- and Docetaxel-Resistant Tumor Models

PURPOSE

Because resistance to paclitaxel and docetaxel is frequently observed in the clinic, new anti-microtubule agents have been sought. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and oral activity of a novel taxane (MST-997) in paclitaxel- and docetaxel-resistant tumor models in vitro and in vivo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tubulin polymerization assays, immunohistochemistry, and cell cycle analysis was used to evaluate mechanism of action of MST-997. The effect of MST-997 on growth inhibition in a panel of paclitaxel- and docetaxel-resistant cell lines that overexpressed P-glycoprotein (MDR1) or harbored beta-tubulin mutations were assayed in vitro and in murine xenografts.

RESULTS

MST-997 induced microtubule polymerization (EC50 = 0.9 micromol/L) and bundling, resulting in G2-M arrest and apoptosis. In addition, MST-997 was a potent inhibitor of paclitaxel- and docetaxel-sensitive tumor cell lines that did not have detectable P-glycoprotein (IC50 = 1.8 +/- 1.5 nmol/L). Minimal resistance (1- to 8-fold) to MST-997 was found in cell lines that either overexpressed MDR1 or harbored point mutations in beta-tubulin. Most notable, MST-997 displayed superior in vivo efficacy as a single i.v. or p.o. dose either partially or completely inhibited tumor growth in paclitaxel- and docetaxel-resistant xenografts.

CONCLUSIONS

MST-997 represents a potent and orally active microtubule-stabilizing agent that has greater pharmacologic efficacy in vitro and in vivo than the currently approved taxanes. Our findings suggest that MST-997, which has entered phase I clinical trials, may have broad therapeutic value.

beta-Tubulin mutations in ovarian cancer using single strand conformation analysis-risk of false positive results from paraffin embedded tissues

Mutations in the beta-tubulin gene have been proposed as a resistance mechanism to paclitaxel. We therefore investigated the presence of mutations in the beta-tubulin M40 gene in 40 ovarian tumours (16 paraffin-embedded and 24 freshly frozen) selected for good or poor response to chemotherapy with paclitaxel or non-tubulin-affecting regimens. The presence of mutations was investigated using single strand conformation analysis followed by sequencing of the products with altered mobility. No sequence variants in the exons of the beta-tubulin M40 gene were detected. Non-reproducible shifts were identified, in eight out of 16 paraffin embedded samples. This may explain some of the previously published discrepancies. In conclusion, sequence variants in the beta-tubulin M40 gene are rare and are unlikely to be a clinically relevant explanation of resistance to paclitaxel.

Resistance to the Tubulin-Binding Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma: No Mutations in the Class Iβ-TubulinGene but Changes in Tubulin Isotype Protein Expression

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether mutations of the class I beta-tubulin gene may be implicated in the inherent resistance to tubulin-binding agents (TBA) in renal cancer, with a small number of samples and cell lines also being examined for class I and III beta-tubulin isotype protein expression.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

DNA was extracted from 90 renal tumors and the class I beta-tubulin gene analyzed for mutations. For each sample, eight PCRs were used to cover the complete coding sequence with intronic primers ensuring highly homologous pseudogenes were not coamplified. Additionally, expression levels of class I and III beta-tubulin isotypes in 17 matched normal and malignant renal samples and a panel of renal cell carcinoma cell lines with differing intrinsic resistance to the TBAs was examined by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Four polymorphic sequence changes of the class I beta-tubulin gene were identified with no mutations. Class I protein expression levels were higher in tumor tissue versus normal tissue, whereas class III expression showed no consistent change. In renal cancer cell lines, a significant correlation between class III isotype expression and vinblastine sensitivity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support a role for mutations in the class I beta-tubulin gene in the intrinsic resistance of renal cancer to TBAs. Class III isotype expression may be implicated in resistance in vitro but in vivo, changes in class I isotype expression in renal cell carcinoma tissue may support a role in resistance to the TBAs and warrants further investigation.

Do beta-tubulin mutations have a role in resistance to chemotherapy?

beta-tubulin is the target of various antitubulin agents used in the treatment of cancer. After beta tubulin was shown to confer resistance to antitubulin agents in established cell lines, several studies have investigated the DNA sequence of this compound in clinical samples. However, these findings are highly controversial, since sequencing experiments showed that the original clinical observation of mutations in the gene resulted from inclusion of non-functional beta-tubulin pseudogenes. At least nine such pseudogenes are known, and all share substantial sequence homology with the functional gene. Subsequent studies have concluded that beta-tubulin mutations in clinical samples are rare, and unlikely to contribute to drug resistance. Here, we overview the beta-tubulin gene family and summarise the results of studies done comparing beta-tubulin mutations with antitubulin drug resistance.

Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules

Since its approval by the FDA in 1992 for the treatment of ovarian cancer, the use of Taxol has dramatically increased. Although treatment with Taxol has led to improvement in the duration and quality of life for some cancer patients, the majority eventually develop progressive disease after initially responding to Taxol treatment. Drug resistance represents a major obstacle to improving the overall response and survival of cancer patients. This review focuses on mechanisms of Taxol resistance that occur directly at the microtubule, such as mutations, tubulin isotype selection and post-translational modifications, and also at the level of regulatory proteins. A review of tubulin structure, microtubule dynamics, the mechanism of action of Taxol and its binding site on the microtubule are included, so that the reader can evaluate Taxol resistance in context.

New insights in beta-tubulin sequence analysis in non-small cell lung cancer

Scarce data are available regarding the molecular mechanisms implicated in paclitaxel resistance. There is controversial data about beta-tubulin mutations role in paclitaxel resistance. We have conducted this trial to address the influence of beta-tubulin mutations in paclitaxel resistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A group of 15 patients were biopsied and diagnosed of stages IIIB and IV NSCLC. Tumor specimens were used for DNA isolation and exon 4 of HM40 beta-tubulin isotype was amplified and automatically sequenced, using both intronic and exonic primers. Next, the chemotherapy schedule consisted of weekly paclitaxel (100 or 150 mg/m(2) x 6) followed 2 weeks later by cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 14, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 14, every 28 days. Using exonic primers, gene sequence alterations were found in 13/15 (87%) patients, including transitions (codons 180 and 182) and one silent transversion (codon 195). Also, three transversions (codons 231, 234, and 235) were found in all patients and controls. All alterations disappeared when sequenced with intronic primers. Our results suggest that point mutations demonstrated with exonic primers but not with intronic ones are probably due to beta-tubulin pseudogenes present in advanced NSCLC specimens. Even so, when these beta-tubulin pseudogenes are found there is a clear relation with clinical response. Although these changes could be relevant in paclitaxel resistance, this observation must be proven in future clinical trials to resolve "the tubulin dilemma".