The variable clinicopathological categories and role of human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinoma: A hospital based nation-wide multi-center retrospective study across China

Comprehensive overview of genotype distribution and prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical lesions

Across cervical squamous and glandular lesions, a spectrum of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes has been identified. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary detailing the distribution and profile of HPV genotypes detected in cervical lesions, leveraging insights from histological and cytological findings. High-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotypes exhibit varying degrees of oncogenic potential, with HPV16 and HPV18 identified as the most prevalent and oncogenic types. The distribution of HR-HPV genotypes varies among different degrees of the cervical lesions and varies between squamous and glandular neoplasia. HPV16 is predominantly associated with severe lesions (precancers and carcinomas), while HPV18 demonstrates a significantly higher prevalence in endocervical as compared with squamous neoplasia. The distribution of HR-HPV in severe squamous lesions is complex, involving many HR-HPV genotypes in addition to HPV16, while the distribution of HR-HPV genotypes in endocervical glandular lesions is mainly limited in HPV18 and HPV16. Large datasets from China have identified the three most common HR-HPV genotypes in this population as stratified by diagnostic category: HPV52, HPV16, HPV58 in histologically negative cases and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1); HPV16, HPV52, HPV58 in CIN2/3; HPV16, HPV58, HPV52 or HPV18 in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); HPV16, HPV18 and HPV52 in endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), invasive adenocarcinoma, as well as mixed squamous and glandular lesions. HPV33 is the fourth most common HPV type in CIN2/3 and SCC, while HPV45 occurs more commonly in AIS and adenocarcinoma, compared with squamous lesions. The prevalence and distribution of multiple HR-HPV coinfections vary across different cervical diseases. The clinical significance and pathogenesis of these multiple HR-HPV infections remain uncertain, although recent two large studies demonstrate that multiple HR-HPV infections are not associated with cumulatively higher risk of high-grade cervical squamous lesion development, suggesting competitive and/or cooperative interactions among HPV genotypes. Extensive HPV genotyping aids in risk assessment and optimising clinical approaches for women with mild abnormalities in Pap cytology. Women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap test results and with the infection of some HR-HPV genotypes carry a very low risk of high-grade cervical lesions. HPV genotyping can allow for risk stratification and triage optimisation for these HR-HPV-positive women. Women with atypical glandular cell (AGC) Pap test results showed a specific HPV genotyping pattern and extended HPV genotyping may be helpful for the clinical management of AGCs. Continual advancements in clinical guidelines integrating extended genotyping would increase diagnostic accuracy and refine strategies in clinical management.

Disparities in Survival Outcomes Between Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

To determine the disparities in survival outcomes between stage IIB-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in this study. The primary endpoints were cervical cancer-specific survival (CCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 2752 patients were identified, including 87.5% (n=2408) were SCC and 12.5% (n=344) were AC. Patients with AC had inferior 5-year CCSS (67.5% vs 54.8%, P<0.001) and OS (58.4% vs 47.2%, P<0.001) compared to those with the SCC subtype. The hazard curve of cervical cancer-related death in AC peaked at 2 years (19%) and still small peaks in the 7 and 11 years of follow-up. Regarding SCC, cervical cancer-related deaths peaked at 2 years (15%) and the hazard rate was 2.0% during the six years of follow-up. The multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that histology was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival outcomes. Patients with AC had significantly poor CCSS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). Similar results were found after PSM.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates a significantly better prognosis for cervical SCC patients compared to those with cervical AC undergoing chemoradiotherapy. These results highlight the importance of histological subtyping in predicting treatment outcomes and tailoring therapeutic strategies.

Assessment of the relationships between invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma and human papillomavirus infection and distribution characteristics in China: According to the new WHO classification criteria in 2020

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) and HPV (Human papillomavirus) infection, as well as the characteristics of ECA distribution in China.

METHODS

A total of 756 specimens were collected from seven geographic regions across China. All cases were histologically categorized according to the 2020 WHO classification of female genital tract cancers, and 496 cases were included. We performed the SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 assay on all specimens' whole tissue sections using PCR (WTS-PCR) to detect HPV DNA and 141 WTS-PCR HPV-positive specimens were selected for the laser capture microdissection (LCM).

RESULTS

Four predominant prevalent histological categories of ECA in China were usual type (51.8%, 257), invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (iSMILE) (11.5%, 57), mucinous NOS (not otherwise specid) (10.3%, 51), and gastric type (7.9%, 39). HPV positivity was 91.4% (235/257), 100.0% (57/57), and 90.2% (46/51) in usual type, iSMILE, and mucinous NOS by WTS-PCR detection, respectively (P < 0.001). LCM-PCR results showed a decreasing trend in HPV DNA positivity, and 21 (95.5%) patients with HPV-I were negative for HPV-DNA in glandular epithelial tissue. The most prevalent HPV genotypes in ECA were HPV16 (47.5%), 18 (40.8%), and 52 (6.5%). The average age of patients with HPVA was 44.9 years, while that of patients with HPV-I was 49.1 years, HPVA is more prevalent in younger females in China (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In China, the predominant prevalent histological category of ECA is the usual type of adenocarcinoma, followed by iSMILE. Additionally, patients with HPVA tended to be younger than those with HPV-I.

Assessment of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection Characteristics in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma in China

Background

The characteristics of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection in different pathological types of cervical cancer in China are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate HR-HPV genotypes and age stratification with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) in China.

Materials and Methods

Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer by histopathology in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, were included in this study. The HR-HPV genotype was analyzed in cervical specimens. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs). All tests of statistical significance were two-sided, and the P value<0.05.

Results

A total of 1,590,476 women were screened for cervical cancer, and 688 cervical cancers were detected, including 554 SCC and 93 ADC. The overall HR-HPV infection rate in SCC was higher than that in ADC (91.2% vs 81.7%, P=0.005). HPV-16 was the most prevalent genotype in SCC (70.0%) but was only 31.2% in ADC (P<0.001). However, the prevalence of HPV-18 in ADC was significantly higher than that in SCC (45.2% vs 7.0%; P<0.001). In SCC, the prevalence of HPV-16 was consistently much higher than that of HPV-18 regardless of age group. Among ADC, the prevalence of HPV-18 was higher than that of HPV-16 in women aged ≥45 years. Interestingly, in those aged <35 years, the highest prevalence was observed for HPV-16. HPV-18 infection has the highest risk of ADC (OR= 12.109; P< 0.001), and HPV-45 and HPV-51 were also found to be associated with the occurrence of ADC. However, HPV-16 infection greatly increased the risk of having histological SCC.

Conclusion

HPV-16 and HPV-18 infections are key risk factors for SCC and ADC. The use of HR-HPV genotyping tests in cervical cancer screening and vaccination against major HPV genotypes could reduce the incidence of cervical cancer.

Absolute Risk and Attributable Fraction of Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus in Cervical Cancer and Precancerous Lesions-A Population-Based Study of 6286 Women in Rural Areas of China

Background: To investigate the human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution among the general population and assess the attribution of HPV genotypes targeted by vaccines to protect against cervical lesions theoretically. Methods: Cervical samples were collected from women aged 21 to 64 years old from Inner Mongolia and Shanxi Province in China who had not been vaccinated against HPV. HPV type-specific absolute risk (AR) to classified cervical lesions was calculated and then the attributable fraction (AF) was estimated, together with the combined contributions of the HPV types, targeted by four available HPV vaccines and five HPV vaccines in clinical trials in China to protect against cervical lesions. Results: A total of 6286 women with an average age of 44.1 years ± 8.41 (range: 21−64) participated in the study. The age distribution of 14 HR-HPV and HPV16/18 all showed a ‘U’ shape, which peaked in the ≤25 year-group and >55 year-group. The five most common genotypes were HPV16 (4.3%), HPV52 (4.1%), HPV58 (2.1%), HPV51 (2.1%), and HPV66 (1.7%). The prevalence of HPV types 6 and 11 infections was 1.1% and observed with n significant differences across age stratifications in China. AF to CIN2+ was predominated by HPV 16 with 56.2%, followed by HPV58 (12.0%), HPV52 (8.5%), HPV18 (4.3%), and HPV51 (2.9%). HPV52 and 58 in the prophylactic HPV vaccine would enhance the protection against CIN2+ by approximately 20%. Conclusions: Regarding multi-valent HPV vaccine development in China, the HPV types 16, 52, 58, and 18 should be given priority for their high prevalence at the population level, high AR, notable AF, and high relative risk to high-grade cervical lesions.

The Prevalence of Cervical HPV Infection and Genotype Distribution in 856,535 Chinese Women with Normal and Abnormal Cervical Lesions: A Systemic Review

Cervical cancer is the commonest cancer affecting women worldwide. During the last decades, the incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer have increased in China. This research aims to assess the overall and genotype-specific prevalence of the human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among Chinese women with normal cervix, considering age, and geographic location. We selected studies about HPV prevalence in women from Chinese in Mainland China with normal cervix and abnormal cervical lesions, published between January 1995 and December 2020. The HPV prevalence was analyzed using meta-analysis based on the following: cytological and histological diagnoses, regions, and ages. The overall HPV prevalence in 856,535 women was 14.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) and it increased from 8.2% to 16.5% in studies published from 2006 to 2020. The prevalence of high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) HPV types was 11.3% and 2.7%, respectively. The commonest types of HPV in women from Mainland China were HPV 16 (2.6%), 52 (2.4%), 58 (1.7%), 18 (0.9%), and 33 (0.8%). According to the geographical analysis, the prevalence of different HPV genotypes varied by region, Central China had the highest overall HPV prevalence. HPV16 was the commonest type in all the regions except in South China and East China, where HPV52 was found to be common. Regarding diagnosis, the HPV infection led to cervical cancer diagnosis by cytology and histology with 90.1% and 91.5% rates, respectively. HPV16 and HPV18 were common types associated with cervical cancer diagnosed by cytology and histology. HPV 16, 58, 52, 18, and 33 were the commonest types found in women with normal cervixes from Mainland China. The prevalence of different HPV genotypes varied by age group and region.

The value of HPV genotypes combined with clinical indicators in the classification of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Background

To investigate the differences in HPV genotypes and clinical indicators between cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and to identify independent predictors for differentiating cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 319 patients with cervical cancer, including 238 patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 81 patients with adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively analysed. The clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators, including HPV genotypes, SCCAg, CA125, CA19-9, CYFRA 21–1 and parity, were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses, and a classification model for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was established. The model was validated in 96 patients with cervical cancer.

Results

There were significant differences in SCCAg, CA125, CA19-9, CYFRA 21–1, HPV genotypes and clinical symptoms between cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that SCCAg and HPV genotypes (high risk) were independent predictors for differentiating cervical squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma. The AUC value of the established classification model was 0.854 (95% CI: 0.804–0.904). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.846, 0.691 and 0.899, respectively. The classification accuracy was 0.823 when the model was verified.

Conclusion

The histological type of cervical cancer patients with persistent infection of high-risk HPV subtypes and low serum SCCAg levels was more prone to being adenocarcinoma. When the above independent predictors occur, the occurrence and development of cervical adenocarcinoma should be anticipated, and early active intervention treatment should be used to improve the prognosis and survival of patients.

Progression from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to cervical lesion or clearance in women (18-25 years): Natural history study in the control arm subjects of AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine efficacy study in China between 2008 and 2016

BACKGROUND

: Cervical cancer is the third most frequent cancer in Chinese women aged 15-44 years old. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized as the main etiologic agent of cervical carcinomas. This study aims to better understand the natural history of HPV infections in Chinese women aged 18-25 years.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 3,025 control arm women (AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine trial) were analyzed to assess the probability of progression or clearance from a 6-month persistent infection (6MPI) to a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+), and the association with clinical determinants. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

A total of 1,324 women with 3,814 HPV infections were included, and 65.7% of the women had at least one 6MPI. Among those 6MPI, 5.0% progressed to CIN2+, while 61.0% cleared within 6 months. The risk of progression from 6MPI to CIN2+ was substantially higher for oncogenic versus non-oncogenic HPV types.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncogenic HPV infections showed lower clearance and higher risk to progress to CIN2+. These findings observed in a population of Chinese women, confirmed previous findings from multinational studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

: The PATRICIA and AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766 and NCT00122681).

P16INK4A expression might be associated with a favorable prognosis for cervical adenocarcinoma via dysregulation of the RB pathway

Previous studies have largely failed to clarify the relationship between p16^INK4A status and cervical adenocarcinoma prognosis. The current study aimed to examine the clinical and pathological significance of p16^INK4A expression in several cervical adenocarcinoma subtypes. Eighty-two samples collected from patients with cervical adenocarcinoma were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. Next, p16^INK4A levels were analyzed with immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the relationship between p16^INK4A expression and clinicopathological factors as well as prognosis was evaluated. The expression of p16^INK4A was mostly detected in all usual cervical adenocarcinoma subtypes. In the gastric type, only a few cases were positive for p16^INK4A expression. Results of the Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the positive p16^INK4A expression in tumor cells was significantly associated with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (p = 0.018 and p = 0.047, respectively, log-rank test). Our findings suggest that the status of p16^INK4A expression may influence prognosis. Thus, p16^INK4A expression could be used as a biomarker for improving the prognosis of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Prevalence and carcinogenic risk of high-risk human papillomavirus subtypes in different cervical cytology: a study of 124,251 cases from the largest academic center in China

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the prevalence and carcinogenic risks of individual high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in all types of cervical cytology specimens in the Shanghai population.

METHODS

A total of 124,251 cases with cotesting of cytology and HPV genotyping between October 2017 and February 2020 were included.

RESULTS

The overall HPV positive rate was 24.3%, with 22.9% for HR-HPV and 6.1% for low-risk HPV. The top five most common HR-HPV subtypes were HPV 52/16/58/53/39 in the entire studied population, and HPV 16/53/56/51/39 in women with abnormal cytology. The most prevalent subtypes in negative/LSIL, HSIL, and glandular lesions were HPV 52, 16, and 18, respectively. HPV 16, 33, 26, 18, 58, and 82 were the most common subtypes significantly associated with an increased risk for HSIL + cytology. HPV 16/18 were present in 53.6% and 66.7%, and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were identified in 90.3% and 80.1% of HSIL and squamous cell carcinoma cytology, respectively. HPV 16/18 and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 were detected in 37.0% and 44.4% of women with cytologic interpretation of in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale study identified the most common HPV subtypes in each cytology category, and the carcinogenic risks of individual HR-HPV in the studied Shanghai population. The results would provide valuable information for the development of next-generation HPV vaccines and cervical cancer screening programs for the Chinese population, and, more specifically, the Shanghai metropolitan population.

Genomic alterations caused by HPV integration in a cohort of Chinese endocervical adenocarcinomas

The association between human papillomavirus (HPV) integration and relevant genomic changes in uterine cervical adenocarcinoma is poorly understood. This study is to depict the genomic mutational landscape in a cohort of 20 patients. HPV+ and HPV− groups were defined as patients with and without HPV integration in the host genome. The genetic changes between these two groups were described and compared by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and whole-exome sequencing (WES). WGS identified 2916 copy number variations and 743 structural variations. WES identified 6113 somatic mutations, with a mutational burden of 2.4 mutations/Mb. Six genes were predicted as driver genes: PIK3CA, KRAS, TRAPPC12, NDN, GOLGA6L4 and BAIAP3. PIK3CA, NDN, GOLGA6L4, and BAIAP3 were recognized as significantly mutated genes (SMGs). HPV was detected in 95% (19/20) of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma, 7 of whom (36.8%) had HPV integration (HPV+ group). In total, 1036 genes with somatic mutations were confirmed in the HPV+ group, while 289 genes with somatic mutations were confirmed in the group without HPV integration (HPV− group); only 2.1% were shared between the two groups. In the HPV+ group, GOLGA6L4 and BAIAP3 were confirmed as SMGs, while PIK3CA, NDN, KRAS, FUT1, and GOLGA6L64 were identified in the HPV− group. ZDHHC3, PKD1P1, and TGIF2 showed copy number amplifications after HPV integration. In addition, the HPV+ group had significantly more neoantigens. HPV integration rather than HPV infection results in different genomic changes in cervical adenocarcinoma.

Transcriptome analysis uncovers the diagnostic value of miR-192-5p/HNF1A-AS1/VIL1 panel in cervical adenocarcinoma

Despite the fact that the incidence of cervical squamous cell carcinoma has decreased, there is an increase in the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma. However, our knowledge on cervical adenocarcinoma is largely unclear. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to compare 4 cervical adenocarcinoma tissue samples with 4 normal cervical tissue samples. mRNA, lncRNA, and miRNA signatures were identified to discriminate cervical adenocarcinoma from normal cervix. The expression of VIL1, HNF1A-AS1, MIR194-2HG, SSTR5-AS1, miR-192-5p, and miR-194-5p in adenocarcinoma were statistically significantly higher than that in normal control samples. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that combination of miR-192-5p, HNF1A-AS1, and VIL1 yielded a better performance (AUC = 0.911) than any single molecule -and could serve as potential biomarkers for cervical adenocarcinoma. Of note, the combination model also gave better performance than TCT test for cervical adenocarcinoma diagnosis. However, there was no correlation between miR-192-5p or HNF1A-AS1 and HPV16/18 E6 or E7. VIL1 was weakly correlated with HPV18 E7 expression. In summary, our study has identified miR-192-5p/HNF1A-AS1/VIL1 panel that accurately discriminates adenocarcinoma from normal cervix. Detection of this panel may provide considerable clinical value in the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Negative Roche cobas HPV testing in cases of biopsy-proven invasive cervical carcinoma, compared with Hybrid Capture 2 and liquid-based cytology

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of results of cytology and Roche cobas (RC) and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) human papillomavirus (HPV) screening tests in cases of biopsy-proven invasive cervical carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data were obtained at a university hospital in New York, NY, between 2004 and 2017. Results of cytology, reported per Bethesda classification system, and HPV screening in 177 identified cases with cytology and biopsy-proven diagnosis of cervical carcinoma were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Two cohorts were analyzed. Of the 177 identified cases, cotesting was performed for 100 patients. Among these 100, cotesting screening results would not trigger immediate colposcopy in 6%; HPV screening results were reported as negative in 16% (16% of all RC, 16% of all HC2, 16% total) and, if HPV was the only screening modality, would not trigger a colposcopy. Of the 177 total cases, 128 patients underwent cytology screening prior to biopsy, with a cytology diagnosis that, alone, would not trigger immediate colposcopy in 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HPV DNA screening and cytology screening alone were negative for 16% and 14%, respectively, of patients with biopsy-proven diagnoses of invasive carcinoma of cervical origin, without a significant difference in failure rates between cytology, HC2, and RC. The cotesting approach had a significantly lower failure rate (6%) compared with the 2 other screening modalities alone.

Role of HPV 16 variants among cervical carcinoma samples from Northeastern Brazil

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer affecting women globally. In Brazil, it is the third most frequent type of cancer in women and HPV is present in approximately 90% of cases. Evidence suggests that variants of HPV 16 can interfere biologically and etiologically during the development of cervical cancer.

METHODS

Cervix tumor fragments were collected, their DNA was extracted, and nested PCR was used to detect HPV. Positive samples were sequenced to determine the viral genotype. To characterize the HPV 16 strains, positive samples PCR was used to amplify the LCR and E6 regions of the HPV 16 virus.

RESULTS

Data from 120 patients with cervical cancer were analyzed. Most women were between 41 and 54 years of age, had schooling until primary school, a family income between 1 and 2 times the minimum wage and were married/in a consensual union. There was no statistically significant association between HPV or socio-demographic variables and risk factors for cervical cancer (P <  0.05). HPV was present in 88 women (73%). The most prevalent types were HPV 16 (53.4%), HPV 18 (13.8%), HPV 35 (6.9%) and HPV 45 (5.7%). Of the 47 HPV 16 positive cases, variant A (49%) was present in 23 samples, followed by variant D in 20 cases (43%), and variants B and C in 2 cases each (4%). The most prevalent histological type of HPV 16 tumors was squamous cell carcinoma, followed by adenocarcinoma. There was a statistically significant association between HPV 16 variants and the tumors' histological types (P <  0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of HPV 16 variants will provide data on their influence on the pathological and oncogenic aspects of cervical lesions.

Molecular and pathological basis of HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinoma seen in a global study

International surveys find HPV-negativity in up to 30% of cervical adenocarcinomas. We investigated the pathological diagnosis by expert consensus with immunohistochemistry and the presence of somatic mutations in recognised tumour genes in HPV-positive and negative cervical adenocarcinomas (CADC). A sample was selected of 45 paraffin-embedded cervical blocks diagnosed locally as usual cervical adenocarcinoma from a global study. These represented different diagnoses made at previous diagnostic review and HPV status. All were suitable for analysis for somatic tumour associated gene mutations. Three pathologists examined H/E slides and immunohistochemistry for p16, progesterone receptor and p53 and classified the cases. L1 genes from high-risk HPVs and low-risk HPVs were analysed by SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 version 1 in whole tissue sections and microdissected tumour and retested by PCR for E6/E7 genes of hrHPVs if negative. Cases were analysed for microsatellite instability and next-generation sequencing mutation analysis. From the 45 cases, 20 cases of usual CADC were confirmed of which 17 (85%) were HPV-positive in tumour cells. The other 25 cases were reclassified as endometrial, serous, clear-cell and gastric-type adenocarcinomas and all were HPV-negative in tumour cells. Careful retesting for HPV DNA and IHC leads to more accurate identification of HPV-positive usual cervical adenocarcinomas. Endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas, other uterine adenocarcinoma with multiple somatic mutations were important in misclassification of HPV-negative cases locally managed as cervical adenocarcinoma, as was gastric-type adenocarcinoma with germline STK11 mutation in East Asia. Few consensuses confirmed HPV-negative usual cervical adenocarcinomas showed somatic tumorigenic mutations also seen in some HPV-positive usual CADC.

DNA methylation for cervical cancer screening: a training set in China

Background

Despite rapid improvements in DNA methylation tools for cervical cancer screening, few robust, exploratory studies have been performed using the combination of two host genes, EPB41L3 and JAM3, newly developed assays.

Methods

A review of abnormal liquid-based cytology and/or high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) data from outpatient clinics in the study center from March 2018 to March 2019 was performed. Eligible patients with definitive histological pathology results were included, and their residual cytology samples were assessed for EPB41L3 and JAM3 methylation. The diagnostic accuracies of various screening strategies for definitive pathology and for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or more severe lesions (CIN2+) were compared.

Results

In total, 306 patients were successfully tested; 301 cases with cervical histological pathology were included in the final analysis, including 118 (39.2%) and 183 (60.8%) cases of inflammation/CIN1 and CIN2+, respectively. Regarding CIN2+ detection, methylation status and hrHPV plus methylation had similar positive predictive values (0.930 and 0.954, respectively, p = 0.395). Additionally, hrHPV, methylation, and hrHPV plus methylation had similar negative predictive values (0.612, 0.679, and 0.655, p = 0.677) that were significantly higher than that of cytology alone (0.250, p values 0.012, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). For 49 cases with negative hrHPV results, positive methylation alone was able to differentiate CIN2+ from inflammation/CIN1.

Conclusions

Methylation of both EPB41L3 and JAM3 is an accurate and feasible screening method for CIN2+.

Prior cervical cytology and high-risk HPV testing results for 311 patients with invasive cervical adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study from China's largest independent operator of pathology laboratories

Background

High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for the detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. However, limited and inconsistent data are available about the efficacy of the combination of these two methods for screening cervical adenocarcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study investigated the screening results of a cohort of Chinese patients who were subsequently diagnosed with invasive cervical adenocarcinoma, with the goal of identifying the optimal cervical adenocarcinoma screening method.

Methods

We retrospectively retrieved and analyzed the data from patients with histologically confirmed primary invasive cervical adenocarcinoma from eight local pathology laboratories operated by KingMed Diagnostics, the largest independent operator of pathology laboratories in China, over a 2-year period. Only patients who underwent cytology and/or HR-HPV testing within 6 months before the adenocarcinoma diagnosis were included. HR-HPV DNA was detected using one of two HPV test kits: the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and an HPV genotyping panel (Yaneng Bio, Shenzhen, China).

Results

Of the 311 patients, 136 underwent cytology alone, 106 underwent HR-HPV testing alone, and 69 underwent cytology and HR-HPV co-testing. The sensitivities of cytology alone (64.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9–72.0) and HR-HPV testing alone (66.0, 95% CI: 57.0–75.1) were similar (P = 0.738). The sensitivity of cytology and HR-HPV co-testing (87.0, 95% CI: 79.0–94.9) was significantly higher than that of either cytology (P = 0.001) or HR-HPV testing alone (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Both cytology alone and HR-HPV testing alone showed poor screening efficiency, whereas the combination of the two clearly increased the efficiency of primary cervical adenocarcinoma screening. Thus, cytology and HR-HPV co-testing might be the most efficient cervical adenocarcinoma screening method.

Clustering patterns of type-type combination in multiple genotypes infections of human papillomavirus in cervical adenocarcinoma

Coinfections with multiple types of human papillomavirus (HPV) occur in cervical adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, it remains unclear the clustering patterns of multiple types in HPV coinfections and relevant factors in ADC. A total of 718 paraffin-embedded ADC specimens were collected in China and tested for HPV genotypes using SPF10-INNO-LIPA. The prevalence of HPV coinfections and clustering patterns by geographical regions, histological subtypes and ages were assessed. Type-specific attribution of HPV to ADC adjusted by HPV coinfections were calculated. The prevalence of HPV coinfections was found to be 8.4% in ADC cases with slight variation by geographic regions between 2.2% and 12.5%. The 88.3% of all HPV multiple infections in ADC were two types of HPV coinfections with predominant combination of HPV 16 and HPV 18. The attribution to ADC was 88.0% for HPV 16/18 targeted by bivalent and quadrivalent vaccine and 96.8% for HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 targeted by nonavalent vaccine. Clustering patterns of multiple types were related with histological categories and age at diagnosis. In conclusion, HPV coinfections are uncommonly prevalent in ADC cases with slight variation by geographic regions and distinct clustering patterns of multiple types by histological subtypes and ages at diagnosis. The high attribution of carcinogenic HPV types to ADC predicts potential protection of HPV vaccine against ADC.

The association between human papillomavirus 16, 18 DNA load and E6 protein expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that high HPV DNA load and elevated E6 protein expression correlate with cervical cancer, but no epidemiological study has been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between type-specific HPV DNA load and presence of E6 protein in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional multicenter study performed between 2013 and 2017. A total of 1717 women (normal histopathology: n = 916; CIN1: n = 94; CIN2: n = 63; CIN3: n = 130; SCC: n = 474; adenocarcinoma: n = 40) were included. HPV DNA load and presence of E6 protein were detected. DNA load was measured as log copies/10,000 cells.

RESULTS

The HPV16/18-E6 positivity rates increased from negative for DNA to the highest load grade. Compared to the HPV16 DNA negatives, women with low (RR = 31.5, 95%CI = 18.9-52.5), medium-low (RR = 133.5, 95%CI = 77.3-230.7), medium-high (RR = 247.9, 95%CI = 134.9-455.6) and high DNA loads (RR = 677.9, 95%CI = 301.6-1523.7) had increasingly higher relative ratios of HPV16-E6 expression. The association of HPV18-E6 with its DNA load was also significant for low (RR = 27.9, 95%CI = 10.4-74.9), medium-low (RR = 89.0, 95%CI = 32.8-241.3), medium-high (RR = 276.8, 95%CI = 76.7-998.9) and high grade (RR = 441.2, 95%CI = 97.7-1992.4). The positivity rates of both HPV16 DNA and E6 protein increased consistently with the severity of diseases from normal histopathology to SCC. Unlike HPV16, the trends of HPV18 DNA and E6 protein fluctuated consistently among women from normal histopathology to cancer. DNA load in E6-positive women was significantly higher than E6-negative for both types.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a type-dependent association between HPV16/18 DNA load and E6 protein; our study furthers the understanding of the natural history of cervical cancer.