1
|
Marcon M, Fuchsjäger MH, Clauser P, Mann RM. ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10740-5. [PMID: 38656711 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10740-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women accounting for about 30% of all new cancer cases and the incidence is constantly increasing. Implementation of mammographic screening has contributed to a reduction in breast cancer mortality of at least 20% over the last 30 years. Screening programs usually include all women irrespective of their risk of developing breast cancer and with age being the only determining factor. This approach has some recognized limitations, including underdiagnosis, false positive cases, and overdiagnosis. Indeed, breast cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths in women undergoing cancer screening. Supplemental imaging modalities, including digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, breast MRI, and, more recently, contrast-enhanced mammography, are available and have already shown potential to further increase the diagnostic performances. Use of breast MRI is recommended in high-risk women and women with extremely dense breasts. Artificial intelligence has also shown promising results to support risk categorization and interval cancer reduction. The implementation of a risk-stratified approach instead of a "one-size-fits-all" approach may help to improve the benefit-to-harm ratio as well as the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. KEY POINTS: Regular mammography should still be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women and women with extremely dense breast tissue should use MRI for supplemental screening or US if MRI is not available. Women need to participate actively in the decision to undergo personalized screening. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Mammography is an effective imaging tool to diagnose breast cancer in an early stage and to reduce breast cancer mortality (evidence level I). Until more evidence is available to move to a personalized approach, regular mammography should be considered the mainstay of the breast cancer screening. High-risk women should start screening earlier; first with yearly breast MRI which can be supplemented by yearly or biennial mammography starting at 35-40 years old (evidence level I). Breast MRI screening should be also offered to women with extremely dense breasts (evidence level I). If MRI is not available, ultrasound can be performed as an alternative, although the added value of supplemental ultrasound regarding cancer detection remains limited. Individual screening recommendations should be made through a shared decision-making process between women and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magda Marcon
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Institute of Radiology, Hospital Lachen, Oberdorfstrasse 41, 8853, Lachen, Switzerland.
| | - Michael H Fuchsjäger
- Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Research Group: Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grotteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brettschneider J, Morrison B, Jenkinson D, Freeman K, Walton J, Sitch A, Hudson S, Kearins O, Mansbridge A, Pinder SE, Given-Wilson R, Wilkinson L, Wallis MG, Cheung S, Taylor-Phillips S. Development and quality appraisal of a new English breast screening linked data set as part of the age, test threshold, and frequency of mammography screening (ATHENA-M) study. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:98-112. [PMID: 38263823 PMCID: PMC11027252 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To build a data set capturing the whole breast cancer screening journey from individual breast cancer screening records to outcomes and assess data quality. METHODS Routine screening records (invitation, attendance, test results) from all 79 English NHS breast screening centres between January 1, 1988 and March 31, 2018 were linked to cancer registry (cancer characteristics and treatment) and national mortality data. Data quality was assessed using comparability, validity, timeliness, and completeness. RESULTS Screening records were extracted from 76/79 English breast screening centres, 3/79 were not possible due to software issues. Data linkage was successful from 1997 after introduction of a universal identifier for women (NHS number). Prior to 1997 outcome data are incomplete due to linkage issues, reducing validity. Between January 1, 1997 and March 31, 2018, a total of 11 262 730 women were offered screening of whom 9 371 973 attended at least one appointment, with 139 million person-years of follow-up (a median of 12.4 person years for each woman included) with 73 810 breast cancer deaths and 1 111 139 any-cause deaths. Comparability to reference data sets and internal validity were demonstrated. Data completeness was high for core screening variables (>99%) and main cancer outcomes (>95%). CONCLUSIONS The ATHENA-M project has created a large high-quality and representative data set of individual women's screening trajectories and outcomes in England from 1997 to 2018, data before 1997 are lower quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the most complete data set of English breast screening records and outcomes constructed to date, which can be used to evaluate and optimize screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Brettschneider
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Breanna Morrison
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - David Jenkinson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Karoline Freeman
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Walton
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, NHS England, Birmingham, B2 4BH, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Sitch
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Hudson
- Peel & Schriek Consulting Ltd, London, NW3 4QG, United Kingdom
| | - Olive Kearins
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, NHS England, Birmingham, B2 4BH, United Kingdom
| | - Alice Mansbridge
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Given-Wilson
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Wilkinson
- Oxford Breast Imaging Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew G Wallis
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Shan Cheung
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, NHS England, Birmingham, B2 4BH, United Kingdom
| | - Sian Taylor-Phillips
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brentnall AR, Atakpa EC, Hill H, Santeramo R, Damiani C, Cuzick J, Montana G, Duffy SW. An optimization framework to guide the choice of thresholds for risk-based cancer screening. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:223. [PMID: 38017184 PMCID: PMC10684532 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
It is uncommon for risk groups defined by statistical or artificial intelligence (AI) models to be chosen by jointly considering model performance and potential interventions available. We develop a framework to rapidly guide choice of risk groups in this manner, and apply it to guide breast cancer screening intervals using an AI model. Linear programming is used to define risk groups that minimize expected advanced cancer incidence subject to resource constraints. In the application risk stratification performance is estimated from a case-control study (2044 cases, 1:1 matching), and other parameters are taken from screening trials and the screening programme in England. Under the model, re-screening in 1 year for the highest 4% AI model risk, in 3 years for the middle 64%, and in 4 years for 32% of the population at lowest risk, was expected to reduce the number of advanced cancers diagnosed by approximately 18 advanced cancers per 1000 diagnosed with triennial screening, for the same average number of screens in the population as triennial screening for all. Sensitivity analyses found the choice of thresholds was robust to model parameters, but the estimated reduction in advanced cancers was not precise and requires further evaluation. Our framework helps define thresholds with the greatest chance of success for reducing the population health burden of cancer when used in risk-adapted screening, which should be further evaluated such as in health-economic modelling based on computer simulation models, and real-world evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Emma C Atakpa
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruggiero Santeramo
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Celeste Damiani
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Data Science & Computation Facility, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Giovanni Montana
- Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill H, Kearns B, Pashayan N, Roadevin C, Sasieni P, Offman J, Duffy S. The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1801-1809. [PMID: 37848734 PMCID: PMC10667489 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02461-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been growing interest in the UK and internationally of risk-stratified breast screening whereby individualised risk assessment may inform screening frequency, starting age, screening instrument used, or even decisions not to screen. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of eight proposals for risk-stratified screening regimens compared to both the current UK screening programme and no national screening. METHODS A person-level microsimulation model was developed to estimate health-related quality of life, cancer survival and NHS costs over the lifetime of the female population eligible for screening in the UK. RESULTS Compared with both the current screening programme and no screening, risk-stratified regimens generated additional costs and QALYs, and had a larger net health benefit. The likelihood of the current screening programme being the optimal scenario was less than 1%. No screening amongst the lowest risk group, and triannual, biennial and annual screening amongst the three higher risk groups was the optimal screening strategy from those evaluated. CONCLUSIONS We found that risk-stratified breast cancer screening has the potential to be beneficial for women at the population level, but the net health benefit will depend on the particular risk-based strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hill
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
| | - Ben Kearns
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
- Lumanity Inc, Sheffield, England
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England
| | - Cristina Roadevin
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Judith Offman
- Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vrinzen CEJ, Bloemendal HJ, Jeurissen PPT. How to create value with constrained budgets in oncological care? A narrative review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:989-999. [PMID: 37650221 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2253375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As a result of an increasing focus on patient-centered care within oncology and more pressure on the sustainability of health-care systems, the discussion on what exactly constitutes value re-appears. Policymakers seek to improve patient values; however, funding all values is not sustainable. AREAS COVERED We collect available evidence from scientific literature and reflect on the concept of value, the possible incorporation of a wide spectrum of values in reimbursement decisions, and alternative strategies to increase value in oncological care. EXPERT OPINION We state that value holds many different aspects. For reimbursement decisions, we argue that it is simply not feasible to incorporate all patient values because of the need for efficient resource allocation. We argue that we should shift the value debate from the individual perspective of patients to creating value for the cancer population at large. The different strategies we address are as follows: (1) shared decision-making; (2) biomarkers and molecular diagnostics; (3) appropriate evaluation, payment and use of drugs; (4) supportive care; (5) cancer prevention and screening; (6) monitoring late effect; (7) concentration of care and oncological networking; and (8) management of comorbidities. Important preconditions to support these strategies are strategic planning, consistent cancer policies and data availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cilla E J Vrinzen
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Haiko J Bloemendal
- Department of Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick P T Jeurissen
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strandberg R, Abrahamsson L, Isheden G, Humphreys K. Tumour Growth Models of Breast Cancer for Evaluating Early Detection-A Summary and a Simulation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030912. [PMID: 36765870 PMCID: PMC9913080 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
With the advent of nationwide mammography screening programmes, a number of natural history models of breast cancers have been developed and used to assess the effects of screening. The first half of this article provides an overview of a class of these models and describes how they can be used to study latent processes of tumour progression from observational data. The second half of the article describes a simulation study which applies a continuous growth model to illustrate how effects of extending the maximum age of the current Swedish screening programme from 74 to 80 can be evaluated. Compared to no screening, the current and extended programmes reduced breast cancer mortality by 18.5% and 21.7%, respectively. The proportion of screen-detected invasive cancers which were overdiagnosed was estimated to be 1.9% in the current programme and 2.9% in the extended programme. With the help of these breast cancer natural history models, we can better understand the latent processes, and better study the effects of breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rickard Strandberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: (R.S.); (K.H.)
| | - Linda Abrahamsson
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: (R.S.); (K.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laza-Vásquez C, Martínez-Alonso M, Forné-Izquierdo C, Vilaplana-Mayoral J, Cruz-Esteve I, Sánchez-López I, Reñé-Reñé M, Cazorla-Sánchez C, Hernández-Andreu M, Galindo-Ortego G, Llorens-Gabandé M, Pons-Rodríguez A, Rué M. Feasibility and Acceptability of Personalized Breast Cancer Screening (DECIDO Study): A Single-Arm Proof-of-Concept Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:10426. [PMID: 36012059 PMCID: PMC9407798 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering risk-based breast cancer screening and its integration into regular clinical practice. A single-arm proof-of-concept trial was conducted with a sample of 387 women aged 40-50 years residing in the city of Lleida (Spain). The study intervention consisted of breast cancer risk estimation, risk communication and screening recommendations, and a follow-up. A polygenic risk score with 83 single nucleotide polymorphisms was used to update the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk model and estimate the 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer. The women expressed a positive attitude towards varying the frequency of breast screening according to individual risk and, especially, more frequently inviting women at higher-than-average risk. A lower intensity screening for women at lower risk was not as welcome, although half of the participants would accept it. Knowledge of the benefits and harms of breast screening was low, especially with regard to false positives and overdiagnosis. The women expressed a high understanding of individual risk and screening recommendations. The participants' intention to participate in risk-based screening and satisfaction at 1-year were very high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celmira Laza-Vásquez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy and Health Care Research Group (GRECS), IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
- IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Carles Forné-Izquierdo
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Heorfy Consulting, 25007 Lleida, Spain
| | - Jordi Vilaplana-Mayoral
- Department of Computing and Industrial Engineering, University of Lleida, 25001 Lleida, Spain
| | - Inés Cruz-Esteve
- Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, 25003 Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Mercè Reñé-Reñé
- Department of Radiology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna Pons-Rodríguez
- Example Basic Health Area, Catalan Institute of Health, 25006 Lleida, Spain
- Health PhD Program, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rué
- IRBLleida—Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Faria Castro Fleury E, Castro C, do Amaral MSC, Roveda Junior D. Management of Non-Mass Enhancement at Breast Magnetic Resonance in Screening Settings Referred for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Biopsy. BREAST CANCER: BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2022; 16:11782234221095897. [PMID: 35602239 PMCID: PMC9118420 DOI: 10.1177/11782234221095897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives According to the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS), one of the main limitations of MRI is diagnosing the non-mass enhancement (NME). The NME lesion is challenging since it is unique to the MRI lexicon. This study aims to report our experience with NME lesions diagnosed by MRI referred for MRI-guided biopsies and discuss the management and follow-up of these lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively evaluated all MRI-guide breast biopsies. We included all patients referred for NME breast MRI-guided biopsy in screening settings. All patients had a negative second-look mammography or ultrasonography. We correlated the distribution and internal enhancement pattern (IEP) of the NME lesions with histology. Invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of no special type and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were considered malignant lesions. Results From January-2018 to July-2021, we included 96 women with a total of 96 lesions in the study. There were 90 benign and 6 malignant lesions with DCIS prevalence (5/6 cancers). The most frequent benign lesion type was fibrocystic changes. There were no NME lesions with diffuse or multiple area distribution features referred to MRI-guided biopsy. The positive-predictive values (PPV) were respectively 0.0%, 2.5%, 9.0%, and 11.0% for linear, focal, regional, and segmental distribution describers, and 0.0, 3.0%, 7.9%, and 50% for homogenous, heterogeneous, clumped, and clustered-ring enhancement patterns. Conclusion We observe the high potential risk for malignancy in the clustered-ring enhancement followed by the clumped pattern. Segmental distribution presented the highest predictive-positive values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caio Castro
- Department of Radiology, Femme-Laboratório da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mital S, Nguyen HV. Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:501. [PMID: 35524200 PMCID: PMC9074290 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09613-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines for mammography screening for breast cancer vary across agencies, especially for women aged 40–49. Using artificial Intelligence (AI) to read mammography images has been shown to predict breast cancer risk with higher accuracy than alternative approaches including polygenic risk scores (PRS), raising the question whether AI-based screening is more cost-effective than screening based on PRS or existing guidelines. This study provides the first evidence to shed light on this important question. Methods This study is a model-based economic evaluation. We used a hybrid decision tree/microsimulation model to compare the cost-effectiveness of eight strategies of mammography screening for women aged 40–49 (screening beyond age 50 follows existing guidelines). Six of these strategies were defined by combinations of risk prediction approaches (AI, PRS or family history) and screening frequency for low-risk women (no screening or biennial screening). The other two strategies involved annual screening for all women and no screening, respectively. Data used to populate the model were sourced from the published literature. Results Risk prediction using AI followed by no screening for low-risk women is the most cost-effective strategy. It dominates (i.e., costs more and generates fewer quality adjusted life years (QALYs)) strategies for risk prediction using PRS followed by no screening or biennial screening for low-risk women, risk prediction using AI or family history followed by biennial screening for low-risk women, and annual screening for all women. It also extendedly dominates (i.e., achieves higher QALYs at a lower incremental cost per QALY) the strategy for risk prediction using family history followed by no screening for low-risk women. Meanwhile, it is cost-effective versus no screening, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,755 per QALY gained. Conclusions Risk prediction using AI followed by no breast cancer screening for low-risk women is the most cost-effective strategy. This finding can be explained by AI’s ability to identify high-risk women more accurately than PRS and family history (which reduces the possibility of delayed breast cancer diagnosis) and fewer false-positive diagnoses from not screening low-risk women. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09613-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shweta Mital
- School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Hai V Nguyen
- School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laza-Vásquez C, Codern-Bové N, Cardona-Cardona À, Hernández-Leal MJ, Pérez-Lacasta MJ, Carles-Lavila M, Rué M. Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0263788. [PMID: 35120169 PMCID: PMC8815913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the aim of increasing benefits and decreasing harms, risk-based breast cancer screening has been proposed as an alternative to age-based screening. This study explores barriers and facilitators to implementing a risk-based breast cancer screening program from the perspective of health professionals, in the context of a National Health Service. METHODS Socio-constructivist qualitative research carried out in Catalonia (Spain), in the year 2019. Four discussion groups were conducted, with a total of 29 health professionals from primary care, breast cancer screening programs, hospital breast units, epidemiology units, and clinical specialties. A descriptive-interpretive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS Identified barriers included resistance to reducing the number of screening exams for low-risk women; resistance to change for health professionals; difficulties in risk communication; lack of conclusive evidence of the benefits of risk-based screening; limited economic resources; and organizational transformation. Facilitators include benefits of risk-based strategies for high and low-risk women; women's active role in their health care; proximity of women and primary care professionals; experience of health professionals in other screening programs; and greater efficiency of a risk-based screening program. Organizational and administrative changes in the health system, commitment by policy makers, training of health professionals, and educational interventions addressed to the general population will be required. CONCLUSIONS Despite the expressed difficulties, participants supported the implementation of risk-based screening. They highlighted its benefits, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer and those under 50 years of age, and assumed a greater efficiency of the risk-based program compared to the aged-based one. Future studies should assess the efficiency and feasibility of risk-based breast cancer screening for its transfer to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celmira Laza-Vásquez
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Lleida, Spain
| | - Núria Codern-Bové
- Escola Universitària d’Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
- Health, Participation, Occupation and Care Research Group (GrEUIT), Terrassa, Spain
- ÀreaQ, Evaluation and Qualitative Research, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maria José Hernández-Leal
- Department of Economics and Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), Reus, Spain
| | - Maria José Pérez-Lacasta
- Department of Economics and Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), Reus, Spain
| | - Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila
- Department of Economics and Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), Reus, Spain
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), Lleida, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Laza-Vásquez C, Hernández-Leal MJ, Carles-Lavila M, Pérez-Lacasta MJ, Cruz-Esteve I, Rué M. Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a Personalized Breast Cancer Screening Program: Views of Spanish Health Professionals. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19031406. [PMID: 35162427 PMCID: PMC8835407 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a risk-based breast cancer screening program from the point of view of Spanish health professionals. A cross-sectional study with 220 Spanish health professionals was designed. Data were collected in 2020 via a web-based survey and included the advantages and disadvantages of risk-based screening and barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the program. Descriptive statistics and Likert scale responses analyzed as category-ordered data were obtained. The risk-based screening was considered important or very important to reduce breast cancer mortality and promote a more proactive role for women in breast cancer prevention, to increase coverage for women under 50 years, to promote a breast cancer prevention strategy for women at high risk, and to increase efficiency and effectiveness. Switching to a risk-based program from an age-based program was rated as important or very important by 85% of participants. As barriers for implementation, risk communication, the workload of health professionals, and limited human and financial resources were mentioned. Despite the barriers, there is good acceptance, and it seems feasible, from the perspective of health professionals, to implement a risk-based breast cancer screening program in Spain. However, this poses a number of organizational and resource challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celmira Laza-Vásquez
- Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain;
| | - María José Hernández-Leal
- Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain; (M.J.H.-L.); (M.C.-L.); (M.J.P.-L.)
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain
| | - Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila
- Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain; (M.J.H.-L.); (M.C.-L.); (M.J.P.-L.)
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain
| | - Maria José Pérez-Lacasta
- Research Centre on Economics and Sustainability (ECO-SOS), Department of Economics, Rovira i Virgili University (URV), 43003 Tarragona, Spain; (M.J.H.-L.); (M.C.-L.); (M.J.P.-L.)
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain
| | - Inés Cruz-Esteve
- Primer de Maig Basic Health Area, Catalan Health Institute (ICS), 25003 Lleida, Spain;
| | - Montserrat Rué
- Research Group in Statistical and Economic Analysis in Health (GRAEES), 43204 Reus, Spain
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida-IRBLleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Salata GC, Malagó ID, Carvalho Dartora VFM, Marçal Pessoa AF, Fantini MCDA, Costa SKP, Machado-Neto JA, Lopes LB. Microemulsion for Prolonged Release of Fenretinide in the Mammary Tissue and Prevention of Breast Cancer Development. Mol Pharm 2021; 18:3401-3417. [PMID: 34482696 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The need of pharmacological strategies to preclude breast cancer development motivated us to develop a non-aqueous microemulsion (ME) capable of forming a depot after administration in the mammary tissue and uptake of interstitial fluids for prolonged release of the retinoid fenretinide. The selected ME was composed of phosphatidylcholine/tricaprylin/propylene glycol (45:5:50, w/w/w) and presented a droplet diameter of 175.3 ± 8.9 nm. Upon water uptake, the ME transformed successively into a lamellar phase, gel, and a lamellar phase-containing emulsion in vitro as the water content increased and released 30% of fenretinide in vitro after 9 days. Consistent with the slow release, the ME formed a depot in cell cultures and increased fenretinide IC50 values by 68.3- and 13.2-fold in MCF-7 and T-47D cells compared to a solution, respectively. At non-cytotoxic concentrations, the ME reduced T-47D cell migration by 75.9% and spheroid growth, resulting in ∼30% smaller structures. The depot formed in vivo prolonged a fluorochrome release for 30 days without producing any sings of local irritation. In a preclinical model of chemically induced carcinogenesis, ME administration every 3 weeks for 3 months significantly reduced (4.7-fold) the incidence of breast tumors and increased type II collagen expression, which might contribute to limit spreading. These promising results support the potential ME applicability as a preventive therapy of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Cassone Salata
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Isabella D Malagó
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Vanessa F M Carvalho Dartora
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Ana Flávia Marçal Pessoa
- Departamento de Cirurgia, LIM26, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, São Paulo 01246903, Brazil
| | - Márcia Carvalho de Abreu Fantini
- Departamento de Física Aplicada, Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, 1371, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
| | - Soraia K P Costa
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - João Agostinho Machado-Neto
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Luciana B Lopes
- Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|