Absolute bioavailability and effect of food and antacid on diazepam absorption from a slow-release preparation

Slow Accumulation and Elimination of Diazepam and Its Active Metabolite With Extended Treatment in the Elderly

Age-related changes in disposition of diazepam and its principal active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ), during and after extended dosage with diazepam were studied in healthy volunteers. Eight elderly subjects (ages 61-78 years) and 7 young subjects (21-33 years) received 2.5 mg of diazepam twice daily for 15 days. Predose (trough) concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were measured during the 15 days of dosing, and in the postdosage washout period. Kinetic properties were determined by nonlinear regression using a sequential drug-to-metabolite pharmacokinetic model. Steady-state plasma concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were 30% to 35% higher in elderly subjects compared to young volunteers, and steady-state clearances correspondingly lower, though differences did not reach significance. Large and significant differences were found between young and elderly groups in mean half-life of diazepam (31 vs 86 hours; P < .005) and DMDZ (40 vs 80 hours; P < .02). Half-life values from the multiple-dose study were closely correlated with values from previous single-dose studies of diazepam (R² = 0.85) and DMDZ (R² = 0.94) in the same subjects. With extended dosing of diazepam in the elderly, slow accumulation and delayed washout of diazepam and DMDZ is probable. After discontinuation, withdrawal or rebound effects are reduced in likelihood, but delayed recovery from sedative effects is possible due to slow elimination of active compounds. Safe treatment of elderly patients with diazepam is supported by understanding of age-related changes in pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties.

Influence of food on pharmacokinetics of zolpidem from fast dissolving sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablets

Ingesting food can impact the pharmacokinetics of sedative-hypnotic drugs. A buffered zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) recently became available for the treatment of middle-of-the-night awakening. In this randomized, open-label, single-site study, the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST was evaluated when administered while fasting and following a standard high-fat meal (fed state). Healthy adults aged 18-64 years received a single morning dose of 3.5 mg ZST in the fed or fasting state. From 20 min to 3 h post-dose, zolpidem plasma levels were lower in the fed state compared to the fasting state. After 4 h post-dose (corresponding to "morning wake time"), higher zolpidem plasma levels were evident in the fed state. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for the 0-8 h interval were 160 ng/mL h in the fed state and 203 ng/mL h in the fasting state (P < .001). In the fed versus fasting states, Cmax was 32.0 ng/mL versus 57.3 ng/mL (P < .001), respectively, and Tmax was 3.0 h versus 0.92 h (P < .001), respectively. Together these data suggest that administration of ZST in the fed state is not optimal for maximizing the likelihood of therapeutic benefit and minimizing the probability of residual sedation.

Intermittent drug dosing intervals guided by the operational multiple dosing half lives for predictable plasma accumulation and fluctuation

Intermittent drug dosing intervals are usually initially guided by the terminal pharmacokinetic half life and are dependent on drug formulation. For chronic multiple dosing and for extended release dosage forms, the terminal half life often does not predict the plasma drug accumulation or fluctuation observed. We define and advance applications for the operational multiple dosing half lives for drug accumulation and fluctuation after multiple oral dosing at steady-state. Using Monte Carlo simulation, our results predict a way to maximize the operational multiple dosing half lives relative to the terminal half life by using a first-order absorption rate constant close to the terminal elimination rate constant in the design of extended release dosage forms. In this way, drugs that may be eliminated early in the development pipeline due to a relatively short half life can be formulated to be dosed at intervals three times the terminal half life, maximizing compliance, while maintaining tight plasma concentration accumulation and fluctuation ranges. We also present situations in which the operational multiple dosing half lives will be especially relevant in the determination of dosing intervals, including for drugs that follow a direct PKPD model and have a narrow therapeutic index, as the rate of concentration decrease after chronic multiple dosing (that is not the terminal half life) can be determined via simulation. These principles are illustrated with case studies on valproic acid, diazepam, and anti-hypertensives.

Kinetics and dynamics of lorazepam during and after continuous intravenous infusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the kinetics and dynamics of lorazepam during administration as a bolus plus an infusion, using electroencephalography as a pharmacodynamic end point.

METHODS

Nine volunteers received a 2-mg bolus loading dose of lorazepam, coincident with the start of a 2 microg/kg/hr zero-order infusion. The infusion was stopped after 4 hrs. Plasma lorazepam concentrations and electroencephalographic activity in the 13- to 30-Hz range were monitored for 24 hrs.

RESULTS

The bolus-plus-infusion scheme rapidly produced plasma lorazepam concentrations that were close to those predicted to be achieved at true steady state. Mean kinetic values for lorazepam were as follows: volume of distribution, 126 L; elimination half-life, 13.8 hrs; and clearance, 109 mL/min. Electroencephalographic effects were maximal 0.5 hr after the loading dose, were maintained essentially constant during infusion, and then declined in parallel with plasma concentrations after the infusion was terminated. There was no evidence of tolerance. Plots of pharmacodynamic electroencephalographic effect vs. plasma lorazepam concentration demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an effect-site equilibration delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect-site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic electroencephalographic effect via the sigmoid Emax model. The analysis yielded the following mean estimates: maximum electroencephalographic effect, 12.7% over baseline; 50% effective concentration, 13.1 ng/mL; and effect-site equilibration half-life, 8.8 mins.

CONCLUSION

Despite the delay in effect onset, continuous infusion of lorazepam, preceded by a bolus loading dose, produces a relatively constant sedative effect on the central nervous system, which can be utilized in the context of critical care medicine.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of adinazolam from a sustained release formulation: effect of meal timing and lack of dose dumping

Food effects on adinazolam absorption from sustained release (SR) adinazolam mesylate tablets were assessed in 28 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received 15 mg SR tablets, 15 mg immediate release tablets, 15 mg oral solution, administered after an overnight fast, and 15 mg SR tablets after a high fat breakfast. Treatments were administered in a crossover design. Plasma adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) concentrations were determined by HPLC. Adinazolam and NDMAD AUC values were unaffected by food. Cmax for SR tablets was increased 33 per cent and 18 per cent for adinazolam and NDMAD, respectively, when administered postprandially. Tmax occurred later in the fed state; no dose dumping was observed. Meal timing effects on adinazolam absorption from SR tablets were assessed in 24 healthy subjects, who received 30 mg SR tablets 1 h before, 0.5 h after, 2 h after a high fat meal, and in the fasted state. Postprandial administration had no effect on AUC, but resulted later and higher adinazolam and NDMAD Cmax. Differences in these values were less than 11 per cent. Administration of SR tablets before meals yielded Cmax and Tmax values which were similar to the fasted state. Results suggest that meal timing does not substantially affect adinazolam absorption from the SR tablet.

Absence of effect of food on alprazolam absorption from sustained release tablets

This study examined the effect of food on alprazolam absorption from a mixed polymeric matrix sustained release (SR) tablet in 21 healthy adults. Each subject received each of three treatments according to a crossover design: 1 mg alprazolam SR tablet while fasting; 1 mg alprazolam SR tablet immediately after a standardized breakfast; 1 mg alprazolam conventional tablet while fasting. The breakfast contained approximately 33 g protein, 55 g fat, and 58 g carbohydrate (850 calories). Serial blood samples were obtained and plasma alprazolam levels determined by HPLC. Results indicate that the SR tablet was minimally affected by food. Relative bioavailabilities of the SR tablet while fasting and with food were 100 per cent and 97 per cent, respectively. Although statistically significant, differences in mean Cmax values between SR tablets administered with and without food were small (12 per cent increase with food). Rates of absorption as measured by mean tmax values were also nearly the same: 7.2 h while fasting and 7.0 h with food. Absorption was relatively uniform with the SR tablets. Coefficients of variation for Cmax, tmax, and AUC were somewhat smaller with the SR tablet than with the conventional tablet.

Bioinequivalence of a generic brand of diazepam

Twenty-six healthy male volunteers received a single 10 mg dose of diazepam on two occasions in a crossover bioequivalence study comparing the reference product (Valium) and a generic formulation (NeoCalme). Concentrations of diazepam and its metabolite, desmethyldiazepam, were determined during 264h after each dose. Peak plasma diazepam concentrations were significantly lower for NeoCalme vs Valium (247 vs 394 ng ml-1, p less than 0.001) and reached significantly later after the dose (1.62 vs 0.98 h, p less than 0.001). Total area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) was also significantly lower for NeoCalme (6614 vs 7552 ng ml-1 x h, p less than 0.001), although AUC ratios for NeoCalme divided by Valium satisfied the '75-75' guidelines. Findings for desmethyldiazepam were similar. Thus, diazepam absorption from the generic brand of diazepam is significantly slower than from Valium, which in turn could lead to therapeutic inequivalence.

Desmethyldiazepam pharmacokinetics: studies following intravenous and oral desmethyldiazepam, oral clorazepate, and intravenous diazepam

After single 10-mg intravenous (IV) doses of desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ) to 12 healthy human volunteers, (mean age, 62 years) blood samples were obtained over the next 14 or more days. Mean kinetic variables were volume of distribution (Vd), 90 liters; elimination half-life (t1/2), 93 hours; and clearance, 12.3 mL/min. Vd was significantly correlated with body weight (r = .73, P less than .01) and with percent ideal body weight (r = .91, P less than .001). Eleven of the same subjects also received 5- to 15-mg doses of IV diazepam (DZ). Mean kinetic variables were Vd, 180 liters; t1/2, 83 hours; and clearance, 28 mL/min. Clearances of DZ and DMDZ were significantly correlated (r = .73, P less than .02). Based on area analysis, the extent of conversion of DZ to systemic DMDZ averaged 53%. After oral administration of DMDZ in tablet form (10 mg), or of clorazepate dipotassium in capsule form (15 mg), systemic availability of DMDZ from each of the oral dosage forms was not significantly different from 100%.

Multi-centre general practitioner comparative study of controlled-release ('Valrelease') and conventional ('Valium') forms of diazepam in patients suffering from anxiety

A multi-centre, double-blind, parallel group study was carried out in 114 patients with an anxiety disorder to compare the effectiveness of diazepam given as 5 mg 3-times daily or as a once-daily 10 mg dose of a controlled-release formulation designed to provide smooth drug concentrations over about 24 hours, without the heavy sedation caused by a high initial peak. Patients were allocated at random to receive one or other dosage regimen for 1 week and treatment could be continued for a further week if necessary. Clinical assessments of response to treatment showed that whilst both formulations were equally effective in providing symptomatic improvement, a much higher proportion of patients on controlled-release diazepam were ready to terminate treatment after 1 week, having attained the desired relief of symptoms. Moreover, as indicated by patient diary records, significantly fewer patients on the controlled-release formulation complained of drowsiness in the morning and evening.

Interaction of diazepam with famotidine and cimetidine, two H2-receptor antagonists

Famotidine is currently under investigation as an H2-receptor antagonist. Eleven healthy male volunteers received a single 10 mg intravenous dose of diazepam on three occasions: once during coadministration of famotidine 40 mg bid, once during coadministration of cimetidine 300 mg qid, and once without other drug treatment (control). Multiple blood samples were drawn during the seven days after each diazepam dose. Diazepam and desmethyldiazepam plasma concentrations were measured by electron capture gas chromatography. There were no significant differences among the three treatment conditions in diazepam central compartment volume or total volume of distribution. During the cimetidine as compared with the control treatment, diazepam elimination half-life was significantly increased (72 vs 55 hr, P less than .05), total area under the curve (AUC) increased (11.8 vs 9.8 hr-micrograms/mL, P less than .05), and total clearance reduced (0.20 vs 0.28 mL/min/kg, P less than .05). Seven-day AUC for desmethyldiazepam also increased (4.6 vs 3.8 hr-micrograms/mL, P less than .05). However, there were no significant differences between famotidine and control treatment conditions in diazepam elimination half-life (53 vs 55 hr), total AUC (9.5 vs 9.8 hr-micrograms/mL), or total clearance (0.28 vs 0.28 mL/min/kg) or in seven-day AUC for desmethyldiazepam (3.9 vs 3.8 hr-micrograms/mL). Thus, therapeutic doses of cimetidine significantly impair the clearance of diazepam and desmethyldiazepam. Therapeutic doses of famotidine do not impair diazepam and desmethyldiazepam kinetics, suggesting that there is no significant kinetic interaction when diazepam and famotidine are administered concurrently in clinical practice.