Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of systemic effects of flunisolide after inhalation

Current approaches to the discovery of novel inhaled medicines

Inhaled administration is underutilised because the drug discovery process is viewed as challenging, risky, and expensive. However, unmet medical need continues to grow, and significant opportunities exist to discover novel inhaled medicines delivering the required lung concentrations while minimising systemic exposure. This profile could be achieved by a combination of properties, including lung retention and low oral bioavailability. Property-based rules exist for orally administered compounds, but there has been limited progress defining in silico predictors to guide the discovery of novel inhaled drugs. Recently, the use of informative cell- and tissue-based screens has greatly facilitated the identification of compounds with optimal characteristics for inhaled delivery. Here, we address opportunities for novel inhaled drugs, and the key challenges and uncertainties hampering progress.

A pharmacokinetic simulation tool for inhaled corticosteroids

The pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of inhaled drugs is more complicated than that of other forms of administration. In particular, the effects of certain physiological (mucociliary clearance and differences in membrane properties in central and peripheral (C/P) areas of the lung), formulation (as it relates to drug deposition and particle dissolution rate), and patient-related factors (lung function; effects on C/P deposition ratio) affect the systemic PKs of inhaled drugs. The objectives of this project were (1) to describe a compartmental model that adequately describes the fate of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) after administration while incorporating variability between and within subjects and (2) based upon the model, to provide a freely available tool for simulation of PK trials after ICS administration. This compartment model allows for mucociliary removal of undissolved particles from the lung, distinguishes between central and peripheral regions of the lung, and models drug entering the systemic circulation via the lung and the gastrointestinal tract. The PK simulation tool is provided as an extension package to the statistical software R ('ICSpkTS'). It allows simulation of PK trials for hypothetical ICS and of four commercially available ICS (budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone propionate, and triamcinolone acetonide) in a parallel study design. Simulated PK data and parameters agreed well with literature data for all four ICS. The ICSpkTS package is especially suitable to explore the effect of changes in model parameters on PK behavior and can be easily adjusted for other inhaled drugs.

Evaluation of the administration time effect on the cumulative cortisol suppression and cumulative lymphocytes suppression for once-daily inhaled corticosteroids: a population modeling/simulation approach

Inhaled glucocorticoids continue to be first-line therapy in asthma. To improve improving patient compliance, newer inhaled glucocorticoids have been developed for once-a-day treatment. This study was interested in identifying the optimal time of dosing using 2 surrogate markers of glucocorticoid action. A previously published study on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (cortisol and blood lymphocyte suppression) of the inhaled glucocorticoids budesonide and fluticasone propionate was reanalyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. A stochastic numerical simulation using NONMEM assessed the effects of time of dosing on cortisol (side effect parameter) and blood lymphocytes (side effect and effect parameter). The effects on cortisol were more pronounced when the glucocorticoids were given in the morning, whereas the effects on lymphocytes (an effect controlled by endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids) were maximized when dosing occurred in the late afternoon or evening. Twice-daily dosing of the same dose resulted in smaller differences between maximum and minimal effects. These were of no clinical relevance. Simulations for once-daily dosing support clinical studies that reported a higher antiasthmatic effect and lower cortisol suppression when once-daily dosing occurs in the evening.

Corticosteroids: the mainstay in asthma therapy

Inflammation is now marked as a central feature of asthma pathophysiology and aims of current asthma management are not only to treat acute symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, cough but also to suppress the underlying inflammatory component. Despite the availability of a number of drugs, corticosteroids remain the mainstay in the management of all types of asthma as these are the most potent and effective antiinflammatory agents available so far. Corticosteroids suppress virtually every step in inflammation. However therapeutic doses of oral glucocorticoids are associated with a range of adverse reactions. To overcome these side effects, inhalations have been developed to deliver glucocorticoids directly to the lungs and in the process a number of aerosol preparations have become available, which have advantage of significantly lower toxicity due to low systemic absorption from the respiratory tract and rapid inactivation. Despite considerable efforts by pharmaceutical industry, it has been difficult to develop novel therapeutic agents for asthma management, which could surpass inhaled corticosteroids. Currently the data favours using inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in the majority of patients in all kinds of asthma. If combination therapy is recommended to achieve additional control in severe asthma cases, other drugs such as beta-agonists, antileukotrienes, theophylline, etc. are considered as adjunct therapies to corticosteroids. This review discusses the importance of corticosteroids as first line therapy for asthma treatment with the availability of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic treatment and oral formulations for treating acute exacerbations of moderate to severe asthma.

Risk-benefit value of inhaled glucocorticoids: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

Inhaled glucocorticoids induce therapeutic and adverse systemic effects via the same types of receptors. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of inhaled glucocorticoids generates a risk-benefit value (RBV). Targeted efficacy with minimal adverse effects helps to quantify an appropriate RBV. High lung deposition/targeting, high receptor binding, longer pulmonary retention, and high lipid conjugation are among the pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered for improved efficacy of the compound. Low or negligible oral bioavailability, small particle size and inactive drug at the oropharynx, high plasma protein binding, rapid metabolism, high clearance, and lower systemic concentrations are associated with low risks for adverse effects. Inhaled glucocorticoid potency is enhanced by solution inhalers, which result in higher pulmonary deposition and minimize local adverse effects. These properties, among others, determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled glucocorticoids. Currently available inhaled glucocorticoids do not provide the complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize RBV, leaving room for improvement in the development of future agents.

Single-dose study to compare the pharmacokinetics of HFA flunisolide and CFC flunisolide

The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid flunisolide is a modification of the original chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation. HFA flunisolide replaces CFC with an HFA propellant and uses a built-in spacer in its pressurized metered-dose inhaler. The average HFA flunisolide particle size is 1.2 microm compared with 3.8 microm for the CFC formulation. The smaller particle size improves lung targeting, allowing a reduction in the HFA flunisolide dose relative to CFC flunisolide while maintaining comparable efficacy. In a study of 12 healthy men, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after single doses of 1000 microg CFC flunisolide delivered without a spacer, 340 microg HFA flunisolide delivered through a spacer, and 516 microg HFA flunisolide delivered without a spacer. A standard noncompartmental analysis of the concentration data was performed and mean (+/- S.D.) pharmacokinetic values were reported. Peak plasma concentrations (observed C(max)) were similar for the three treatments. Area under the curve up to the time corresponding to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0)(-)(tlast)) was similar for the CFC and HFA flunisolide, plus spacer groups (4.4 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL and 5.0+/- 4.2 ng x h/mL, respectively); however, AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for the HFA flunisolide without spacer group was comparatively lower than for the CFC group (3.5 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL). Observed C(max) and AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for 6 beta-OH flunisolide, the first-pass metabolite of flunisolide and an indicator of oropharyngeal deposition, were significantly higher in the CFC flunisolide group than in either HFA flunisolide group.

Evidence of P-glycoprotein mediated apical to basolateral transport of flunisolide in human broncho-tracheal epithelial cells (Calu-3)

1. Transepithelial transport of flunisolide was studied in reconstituted cell monolayers of Calu-3, LLC-PK1 and the MDR1-P-glycoprotein transfected LLC-MDR1 cells. 2. Flunisolide transport was polarized in the apical (ap) to basolateral (bl) direction in Calu-3 cells and was demonstrated to be ATP-dependent. In LLC-MDR1 cells, flunisolide was transported in the bl to ap direction and showed no polarization in LLC-PK1 cells. 3. Non-specific inhibition of cellular metabolism at low temperature (4 degrees C) or by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-d-glu) and sodium azide (NaN(3)) abolished the polarized transport. Polarized flunisolide transport was also inhibited by the specific Pgp inhibitors verapamil, SDZ PSC 833 and LY335979. 4. Under all experimental conditions and in the presence of all used inhibitors, no decrease in the TransEpithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) values was detected. From all inhibitors used, only the general metabolism inhibitors 2-deoxy-D-glucose and NaN(3), decreased the survival of Calu-3 cells. 5. Western blotting analysis and confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstrated the presence of MDR1-Pgp at mainly the basolateral side of the plasma membrane in Calu-3 cells and at the apical side in LLC-MDR1 cells. Mass spectroscopy studies demonstrated that flunisolide is transported unmetabolized across Calu-3 cells. 6. In conclusion, these results show that the active ap to bl transport of flunisolide across Calu-3 cells is facilitated by MDR1-Pgp located in the basolateral plasma membrane.

Flunisolide HFA vs flunisolide CFC: pharmacokinetic comparison in healthy volunteers

Two preparations of flunisolide, an inhaled corticosteroid, were compared in a parallel, multiple-dose study of 31 healthy volunteers. The new flunisolide preparation substitutes hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) for chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) as a propellant and incorporates a spacer into its pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). In this study, subjects were randomly assigned to receive flunisolide CFC 1000 microg bid; flunisolide HFA 170 microg bid; or flunisolide HFA 340 microg bid. Dosing was continued for 13.5 days. Plasma samples were analyzed after the first dose on day 1 and again after 13.5 days of treatment. No significant differences in day 1 dose-adjusted peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) were observed. Dose proportionality in C(max) and area under the concentration--time curves (AUC) was observed for the flunisolide HFA 170 and 340 microg bid groups on days 1 and 14. Day 1 mean dose-adjusted AUC was significantly greater in the flunisolide CFC 1000 microg bid group than in either flunisolide HFA group, indicating greater systemic availability of flunisolide CFC. Oral clearance and volume of distribution were significantly higher for flunisolide CFC than for flunisolide HFA. This may be due to greater oropharyngeal deposition by the flunisolide CFC formulation. Another indicator of greater flunisolide CFC oropharyngeal deposition was observed in C(max) and AUC(0--tlast) values for 6beta-OH flunisolide, the first-pass metabolite of flunisolide. The values of these pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly higher in the flunisolide CFC group than in the 340 microg bid flunisolide HFA group on days 1 and 14. However, this was not the case for cortisol values where flunisolide HFA accounted for less oropharyngeal deposition and more targeted delivery without adverse events. The study demonstrated that flunisolide HFA administered through a pMDI with built-in spacer was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers.

Suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients

BACKGROUND

Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a potential systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroid therapy, can be quantified by monitoring serum, urinary, and salivary cortisol levels.

OBJECTIVES

1) Compare the effects on HPA axis of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate versus placebo and oral prednisone. 2) Estimate dose-potency ratio for HPA-axis suppression.

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, 21-day trial. Active regimens were flunisolide 500 and 1,000 microg, twice daily; fluticasone propionate 110, 220, 330, and 440 microg, twice daily; and prednisone, 7.5 mg daily. Enrolled patients were nonsmokers, 18 to 50 years of age, with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma and had not used oral, nasal, or inhaled corticosteroids for 6 months before study. Main outcome measures were area under serum cortisol concentration curve for 22 hours (AUC(0-22h)); 24-hour urinary cortisol level; and 8 AM salivary cortisol level.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to active treatment or placebo; 125 patients completed the study and were at least 80% compliant with their regimens. Both fluticasone propionate and flunisolide caused dose-dependent suppression of HPA axis, which was statistically greater for fluticasone propionate (P = 0.0003). Dose-potency ratio showed 4.4 times more serum-cortisol suppression/microgram increase in dose with fluticasone propionate than with flunisolide. Diurnal pattern of serum cortisol suppression was persistent with fluticasone propionate and "remitting" with flunisolide. Salivary and urinary cortisol data were qualitatively similar to serum cortisol results.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone caused significantly more suppression of HPA axis than flunisolide. Flunisolide may provide a safe option for patients with asthma requiring long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

Methods used to assess pulmonary deposition and absorption of drugs

The assessment of pulmonary drug absorption and deposition is becoming increasingly important in drug development. Absorption information can be used to maximize pulmonary selectivity, to screen drug candidates and to help evaluate the bioequivalence of generic inhalation products. Several methods are available to investigate pulmonary drug absorption and deposition, ranging from in vitro experiments to in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. In combination, these methods can indicate the fate of an inhaled drug.

Pharmacokinetics of flunisolide administered via metered dose inhaler with and without a spacer device and following oral administration

BACKGROUND

After inhalation of a glucocorticoid from a meter dose inhaler (MDI), a certain portion of the delivered dose is deposited in the lungs, and the remainder is deposited in the oropharynx.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the absolute bioavailability of flunisolide given orally via metered dose inhaler, and metered dose inhaler with a commercially available spacer device as well as to determine the fraction of drug deposited in the lungs following inhalation.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study; twenty-two completed the study. The IRB approved the study protocol, and informed consent was obtained. Volunteers received four treatments: treatment A (MDI), 1.0 mg inhaled flunisolide; treatment B (MDI-S), 1.0 mg inhaled flunisolide with a spacer device; treatment C, 1.0 mg of orally administered flunisolide with 240 mL of water; and treatment D, 1.0 mg intravenous flunisolide by IV push in the antecubital vein over 60 seconds. Plasma and urine flunisolide were quantified by HPLC/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Flunisolide is a corticosteroid with low oral bioavailability (6.7%), which was found to be lower than previously reported. Similar AUCs were observed between the MDI and MDI-S groups, but by using mass balance equations, it appears that more flunisolide was delivered to the lungs in the MDI-S group (410 microg versus 280 microg). Oropharyngeal deposition was an important difference between the two inhaler groups. Approximately an 11-fold reduction in the oropharyngeal deposition of flunisolide through use of the spacer device was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a spacer device improved pulmonary delivery of flunisolide by almost 50% and significantly decreased the oropharyngeal exposure to drug.

Pharmacokinetic and adrenal interactions of IL-10 and prednisone in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetic and adrenal interactions of recombinant human interleukin-10 and prednisolone were examined in this open-label, randomized, four-way crossover study in 12 healthy adult male volunteers. Single doses of IL-10 (8 micrograms/kg s.c.), IL-10 with prednisone (15 mg p.o.), placebo with prednisone, or placebo were administered on four separate occasions with at least 3-week interceding washout periods. Measurements included plasma prednisone, prednisolone and cortisol, unbound prednisolone, and serum IL-10 concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental and model-fitting analysis, while area analysis and an indirect response model were used to assess cortisol dynamics. IL-10 exhibited prolonged serum concentrations owing to dual-absorption processes that were largely unaffected by prednisone. The Cmax values were about 3 ng/mL, while the tmax occurred at 7 to 9 hours. Prednisolone exhibited rapid systemic kinetics with a Cmax of 235 ng/mL, tmax at 1.11 hours, and t1/2 of 2.54 hours with no significant alterations owing to IL-10. Both prednisolone and prednisolone/IL-10 caused marked suppression of cortisol concentrations with similar magnitude and IC50 values; however, IL-10 alone significantly increased the 24-hour AUC of cortisol by 20%. Thus, IL-10 and prednisolone do not interact in disposition or adrenal suppression to a clinically significant degree.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach to predict the cumulative cortisol suppression of inhaled corticosteroids

The suppression of endogenous cortisol release is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. The circadian rhythm of the endogenous cortisol release and the resulting plasma concentrations as well as the release suppression during corticosteroid therapy could previously be described with an integrated PK/PD model. Based on this model, a PK/PD approach was developed to quantify and predict the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The presented method was applied to predict CCS after single doses and during short-term multiple dosing of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide (FLU), fluticasone propionate (FP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), and after oral methylprednisolone as systemic reference therapy. Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single-dose studies and extrapolated to the multiple-dose situation. For single dosing, a similar CCS within the range of 16-21% was predicted for FP 250 micrograms, FLU 500 micrograms, and TCA 1000 micrograms. For multiple dosing, a respective CCS of 28-33% was calculated for FLU 500 micrograms bid, FP 250 micrograms, bid, and TCA 1000 micrograms bid. Higher cortisol suppression compared to these single and multiple dosing regimens of the inhaled corticosteroids was predicted after oral doses of only 1 mg and 2 mg methylprednisolone, respectively. The predictive power of the approach was evaluated by comparing the PK/PD-based simulations with data reported previously in clinical studies. The predicted CCS values were in good correlation with the clinically observed results. Hence, the presented PK/PD approach allows valid predictions of CCS for single and short-term multiple dosing of inhaled corticosteroids and facilitates comparisons between different dosing regimens and steroids.

Establishing a therapeutic index for the inhaled corticosteroids: part I. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison of the inhaled corticosteroids

The inhaled corticosteroids contain physicochemical differences that alter both glucocorticoid receptor-binding characteristics and the pharmacokinetic variables of these drugs. Differences in receptor-binding affinity translate into differences in potency for different drugs. Differences in pharmacokinetics, however, determine the topical effect to systemic effect ratio, or the "pulmonary targeting" of the drug. Beneficial pharmacokinetic properties that may improve pulmonary targeting include low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, and slow absorption from the lung. Delivery devices can produce clinically significant differences in topical activity by altering the dose deposited in the lung and, for orally absorbed drugs, the amount deposited in the oropharynx and swallowed. Clinical trials have confirmed that differences in potency or drug delivery of 2-fold or more can be detected in patients with asthma. However, because of the relatively flat nature of the dose-response curve for morning peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the trials must be adequately powered and well controlled. The use of bronchial provocation measures are problematic because of the prolonged lag time for response. Study design flaws can lead to misinterpretation of results. Clinical studies have indicated the following relative potency differences: fluticasone propionate > budesonide = beclomethasone dipropionate > triamcinolone acetonide = flunisolide. Current evidence suggests that potency differences can be overcome by giving larger doses of the less potent drug. However, because of these potency differences, studies of systemic effects should not be done in isolation of adequate topical activity studies to define the pulmonary targeting of the drugs.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled corticosteroids

There are significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids currently used in medical practice. All are rapidly cleared from the body but they show varying levels of oral bioavailability and more importantly variation in the rate of absorption after inhalation. Oral bioavailability is lowest for fluticasone propionate, indicating a low potential for unwanted systemic corticosteroid effects. Mathematical modeling has shown pulmonary residence times to be longest for fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide but shortest for budesonide and flunisolide. These properties appear to relate to pulmonary solubility, which appears to be the rate-limiting step in the absorption process.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled corticosteroids in relation to efficacy and safety

There are significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of inhaled corticosteroids currently available for use in treatment of asthma and this can result in differences in pharmacodynamic activity. All currently used inhaled corticosteroids are rapidly cleared from the body, but show varying levels of oral bioavailability, with fluticasone propionate having the lowest. Following inhalation, there is also considerable variability in the rate of absorption from the lung, and pulmonary residence times are greatest for fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide, and shortest for budesonide and flunisolide. Cortisol suppression is frequently used as a surrogate marker of systemic corticosteroid activity. Cortisol release displays a circadian rhythm, which can be mathematically modelled and the effects of exogenous corticosteroids on cortisol suppression established. However, when interpreting the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on cumulative cortisol suppression, it is important to take into consideration the pharmacokinetic properties of each particular drug, together with the study design and the time of administration.