Molecular markers in malignant cutaneous melanoma: Gift horse or one-trick pony?

MCAM/MUC18/CD146 as a Multifaceted Warning Marker of Melanoma Progression in Liquid Biopsy

Human malignant melanoma shows a high rate of mortality after metastasization, and its incidence is continuously rising worldwide. Several studies have suggested that MCAM/MUC18/CD146 plays an important role in the progression of this malignant disease. MCAM/MUC18/CD146 is a typical single-spanning transmembrane glycoprotein, existing as two membrane isoforms, long and short, and an additional soluble form, sCD146. We previously documented that molecular MCAM/MUC18/CD146 expression is strongly associated with disease progression. Recently, we showed that MCAM/MUC18/CD146 and ABCB5 can serve as melanoma-specific-targets in the selection of highly primitive circulating melanoma cells, and constitute putative proteins associated with disease spreading progression. Here, we analyzed CD146 molecular expression at onset or at disease recurrence in an enlarged melanoma case series. For some patients, we also performed the time courses of molecular monitoring. Moreover, we explored the role of soluble CD146 in different cohorts of melanoma patients at onset or disease progression, rather than in clinical remission, undergoing immune therapy or free from any clinical treatment. We showed that MCAM/MUC18/CD146 can be considered as: (1) a membrane antigen suitable for identification and enrichment in melanoma liquid biopsy; (2) a highly effective molecular "warning" marker for minimal residual disease monitoring; and (3) a soluble protein index of inflammation and putative response to therapeutic treatments.

Methods of detection of circulating melanoma cells: a comparative overview

Disease dissemination is the major cause of melanoma-related death. A crucial step in the metastatic process is the intravascular invasion and circulation of melanoma cells in the bloodstream with subsequent development of distant micrometastases that is initially clinically undetectable and will eventually progress into clinically apparent metastasis. Therefore, the use of molecular methods to detect circulating melanoma cells may be of value in risk stratification and clinical management of such patients. Herein, we review the currently applied techniques for the detection, isolation, enrichment and further characterization of circulating melanoma cells from peripheral blood samples in melanoma patients. Furthermore, we provide a brief overview of the various molecular markers currently being evaluated as prognostic indicators of melanoma progression.

Melanoma-associated markers expression in blood: MUC-18 is associated with advanced stages in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was originally reported to reveal melanoma-associated mRNAs (MAMs) in melanoma cells but not in the peripheral blood of healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the expression of MAMs in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients at different American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages, and to correlate their presence with early and/or advanced stages of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred blood samples of melanoma patients (AJCC I-IV) were analysed using multimarker RT-PCR to assess the co-expression of Tyr-OH, MART-1, MAGE-3, MUC-18/MCAM and p97. Patients were stratified into two disease categories: early and advanced stages. The former includes in situ and melanoma stages AJCC I-II, the latter AJCC III-IV. chi(2) and Fisher's exact tests were used to statistically evaluate the association between each MAM and disease categories. The recognized significant associations were subsequently resubmitted to univariate logistic regression. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity were established.

RESULTS

At least one MAM could be detected in 24% of our series. Tyr-OH was the most common marker (14%), followed by MUC-18 (12%), MART-1 (5%), MAGE-3 (4%) and p97 (3%). No significant association among Tyr-OH, MART-1, MAGE-3, p97 and disease stages were evidenced. Only MUC-18 was statistically associated (P < 0.009) with advanced stages alone or co-expressed with other MAMs. According to logistic regression univariate analysis, MUC-18 increases the probability (odds ratio: 33) being in advanced stages and the incidence of recurrences (95% CI 2.9-374).

CONCLUSIONS

MUC-18 RT-PCR assay could be proposed as an adjunctive molecular method in the management of melanoma patients and is useful in the monitoring of study protocols.

Molecular and biochemical testing in stage III melanoma: multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay of lymph fluid after lymph node dissection and preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase level

BACKGROUND

There is a need for biomarkers to identify patients at risk for disease progression after resection of melanoma regional lymph node metastasis.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the prognostic value of multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in lymphatic drainage (LY) after lymph node dissection (LND) and of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III melanoma patients.

METHODS

We collected 24-h LY from 255 stage III melanoma patients after radical LND [114, completion LND after positive sentinel node biopsy (CLND); 141, therapeutic LND for clinically/cytologically detected regional nodal metastases (TLND)]. For detection of melanoma cells, RT-PCR assays with primers specific for tyrosinase, MART1 (MelanA) and uMAGE mRNA were conducted. The LY sample was deemed positive if at least one marker was detected. In 244 patients, the preoperative serum LDH level was available. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range 5-60).

RESULTS

The LY multimarker RT-PCR assay results were positive in 82 of 255 patients (32%). A significantly higher rate of melanoma recurrence was observed in patients with positive LY multimarker RT-PCR results (P = 0.01). Significant relationships were observed between positive LY multimarker RT-PCR results and shorter 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), both in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.007). Preoperative serum LDH level was increased in 79 of 244 patients (32%) [40.5% in TLND group and 23.0% in CLND group (P = 0.003)]. There were significant differences in OS between patients with normal and high preoperative LDH levels (P = 0.007), and these differences were seen mainly in patients in the TLND group.

CONCLUSIONS

The multimarker RT-PCR assay detected melanoma cells in approximately 32% of LY after LND, which correlated significantly with early melanoma recurrence and shorter survival. Increased pre-LND serum LDH level had an additional negative impact on OS of melanoma patients with palpable nodal metastases after TLND.

Detection of mutated BRAFV600E variant in circulating DNA of stage III-IV melanoma patients

BRAFV600E is the most represented somatic point mutation in cutaneous melanoma, thus providing a unique molecular marker for this disease. The development of efficient methods for its detection in free circulating DNA of patients may lead to the improvement of diagnostic and prognostic tools. With this aim, we evaluated whether BRAFV600E represents a detectable marker in the plasma/serum from melanoma patients in a pilot study. Circulating cell-free DNA was extracted from the serum or plasma of 15 healthy donors and 41 melanoma patients at different clinical stages and obtained either presurgery or after surgery during follow-up. Quantitative analysis showed higher levels of circulating free DNA in patients compared to controls, with the highest levels detected in samples obtained presurgery and at stage IV. Four different PCR methods were compared for their capacity to amplify a few copies of BRAFV600E in wild-type DNA. BRAFV600E was detectable in circulating DNA of 12 patients and in none of the controls; only 1 PCR method reproducibly amplified BRAFV600E. Positive samples were obtained from 8/13 patients at stage IV and from 4/24 patients at stage III, but not in 4 patients at stage I-II; half of the positives were obtained presurgery and half at follow-up. Correspondence between circulating DNA and related tumors were examined for 20 patients, and a correlation was found for stage IV patients. In conclusion, this method can be utilized for monitoring the disease in stage IV melanoma patients but it appears unsatisfactory for the early detection of melanoma.

Polymorphisms of the neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthase genes and the risk of cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Nitric oxide (NO) is a multifunctional molecule that is produced by both neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) and inducible NO synthase (iNOS), and the expression of nNOS and iNOS is up-regulated in various cancer cells, including cutaneous melanoma (CM). The authors hypothesized that selected functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the nNOS and iNOS genes are associated with the risk of CM.

METHODS

In a hospital-based case-control study of 602 non-Hispanic white patients with CM and 603 matched, cancer-free controls, the authors genotyped the nNOS -84 guanine-to-adenine (G-->A), nNOS 276 cytosine-to-thymine (C-->T), iNOS Ex16+14C-->T, and iNOS 974G-->T SNPs and assessed their associations with the risk of CM in multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A significantly increased risk of CM was associated with the nNOS -84G-->A (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05-2.13) and -84AG+AA (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.06) genotypes compared with the nNOS -84GG genotype, but not with other nNOS or iNOS SNPs. In a combined analysis, an increased risk of CM was associated with the nNOS -84AA+AG/276CT+TT genotype (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05-2.76) and the nNOS -84AA+AG/276CC genotype (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.08-2.68) compared with the nNOS -84GG/276CT+TT genotypes. No altered risk of CM was associated with iNOS genotypes. In addition, there was statistical evidence of interaction of nNOS SNPs with having moles (P = .002) and sunburns (P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variants of nNOS, but not iNOS, may be biomarkers for susceptibility to CM, and the risk of CM associated with sunburns and moles may be modulated by nNOS variant genotypes.

Clinical significance of the RT-PCR positive sentinel node in melanoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of RT-PCR positivity for melanoma markers in the sentinel node remains controversial. Our purpose was to determine whether patients with a histologically negative but RT-PCR positive node were at an increased risk for recurrence than their RT-PCR negative counterparts.

METHODS

Thirty-nine adult patients underwent sentinel node biopsies for melanoma between 1998 and 2000. Each sentinel node was bivalved. Half was serially sectioned and examined by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC; S100, HMB-45, melanA, and tyrosinase). The other half was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay for tyrosinase.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for recurrence with a mean follow-up of 71.1 months. The odds ratio of recurrence for RT-PCR positive versus RT-PCR negative patients was 1.39 (0.34, 5.62; p = 0.73). Within the histology negative subgroups, the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR positive group (26.7%) was not significantly different from the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR negative group (22.2%) (p = 0.33 chi-squared). RT-PCR of the sentinel node was not a predictor for recurrence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel node RT-PCR positivity did not risk stratify histologically negative melanoma patients beyond routine pathologic examination in this series.

Markers and tissue resources for melanoma: meeting report

The Markers and Tissue Resources for Melanoma meeting convened by the Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Specialized Programs of Research Excellence at the Organ Systems Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Melanoma Research Foundation was held in Gaithersburg, MD on October 2005. The meeting reviewed the current status of biomarkers for early- and advanced-stage melanoma and addressed some of the challenges scientists and clinicians face as they unravel the biology of melanoma and try to apply these findings to patient care. Specifically, the participants focused on molecular changes associated with melanoma progression, potential diagnostic and prognostic markers emerging from molecular profiling studies, and new treatment targets for current and future clinical trials. They also highlighted the ongoing challenges about translational research in melanoma, including availability of tissue resources, and summarized the status of nevus and melanoma tissue microarrays, recently developed as a collaborative project between the melanoma research community and the NCI. The meeting report is intended to provide a perspective on emerging scientific approaches in translational research that can enhance the progress in discovery and validation of markers for melanoma. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(22): 10652-7).