Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tegoprazan Coadministered With Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin in Healthy Subjects

Amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori primary eradication: Proton pump inhibitor and potassium-competitive acid blocker, which's better?

BACKGROUND

Effective acid suppression significantly enhances the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) utilizing various highly potent antisecretory medications, thereby providing additional clinical guidance for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

The study population comprised untreated H. pylori patients from three medical centers in central China. From February 10, 2024 to March 31, 2024, 439 subjects were randomly allocated to either the esomeprazole-amoxicillin (EA) or esomeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin-bismuth (B-quadruple) group. Subsequently, from April 1, 2024 to May 10, 2024, 367 subjects were randomly assigned to either the vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) or vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC) group. The study recorded treatment efficacy, adverse events, compliance, symptom alleviation, and associated costs.

RESULTS

EA-dual demonstrated non-inferiority to B-quadruple regimen in modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses (P < 0.025). However, the eradication rate of EA was lower than that of the B-quadruple group [70.59% vs 83.49%, 92.86% vs 98.38%, 93.94% vs 98.38%, intention-to-treat (ITT), mITT, PP respectively, P < 0.05]. In ITT, mITT, and PP analyses, VA-dual was non-inferior to VAC treatment (84.15% vs 83.15%, 96.25% vs 92.73%, 96.75% vs 93.75%, P < 0.025). No significant differences were observed in adverse events, compliance, and symptom relief between groups. VA exhibited the lowest cost. Antibiotic use within 2 years, poor compliance, and suburban residence were associated with reduced eradication efficacy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The HDDT based on vonoprazan demonstrated non-inferiority to the VAC triple regimen, suggesting its potential as a recommended first-line treatment for H. pylori eradication. While B-quadruple therapy showed better eradication rate than EA therapy, the latter proved non-inferior in mITT and PP analyses. Notably, antibiotic use within the preceding two years, adherence to treatment protocols, and patient residence emerged as critical factors influencing eradication success.

Efficacy and Safety of Cefuroxime-Tetracycline-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Penicillin-Allergic Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Penicillin allergy significantly restricts therapeutic options for Helicobacter pylori eradication. This multicenter randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel cefuroxime-tetracycline-containing bismuth quadruple therapy (Cef-Tet BQT) as first-line treatment in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Penicillin-allergic treatment-naïve patients with confirmed H. pylori infection (N = 248) were randomized to two 14-day regimens: one received Cef-Tet BQT (Tegoprazan 50 mg twice a day, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily, cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg three times daily), and the other received cefuroxime-levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy (Cef-Lev BQT: cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily). The primary endpoint assessed noninferiority of eradication rates, with secondary endpoints including safety profiles and adherence.

RESULTS

In total, 248 patients underwent randomization. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 90.32% (112/124, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.12%-95.52%) and 81.45% (101/124, 95% CI: 74.61%-88.29%) (p = 0.045); the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) eradication rates were 91.80% (112/122, 95% CI: 86.93%-96.67%) and 83.47% (101/121, 95% CI: 76.85%-90.09%) (p = 0.048); and the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 92.37% (109/118, 95% CI: 87.58%-97.16%) and 85.34% (99/116, 95% CI: 78.90%-91.78%) (p = 0.087) in the Cef-Tet BQT group and Cef-Lev BQT group, respectively. Noninferiority of the Cef-Tet BQT group was demonstrated in all three analyses (p < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events (21.77% vs. 24.19%) and compliance (96.77% vs. 95.97%) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BQT containing cefuroxime and tetracycline is efficacious and safe for the first-line eradication of H. pylori in penicillin-allergic patients. This regimen provides a viable alternative to circumvent the antimicrobial resistance concerns associated with levofloxacin-based regimens.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06351891.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of gliclazide for different genotypes of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19

Gliclazide is a sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent used to treat type 2 diabetes. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP2C19 are primarily involved in the hepatic metabolism of gliclazide. The two CYP isozymes are highly polymorphic, and their genetic polymorphisms are known to significantly impact the pharmacokinetics of gliclazide. In the present study, the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed using data from subjects whose pharmacokinetic parameters were influenced by the genetic polymorphisms of the CYP metabolic enzymes. All predicted plasma concentration-time profiles generated by the model showed visual agreement with the observed data, and the pharmacokinetic results were within the twofold error range. Individual simulation results showed additional metrics: average fold error (- 0.19 to 0.07), geometric mean fold error (1.13-1.56), and mean relative deviation (1.18-1.58) for AUC, Cmax, T1/2, Tmax, CL/F, and Vd values. These results met the standard evaluation criteria. The validation across a total of 8 studies and 7 races also satisfied the twofold error range for AUC, Cmax, and T1/2. Therefore, variations in gliclazide exposure according to individuals' CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genotypes were properly captured through PBPK modeling in this study. This PBPK model may allow us to predict the gliclazide pharmacokinetics of patients with genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C9 and CYPC19 under various conditions, ultimately contributing to the realization of individualized drug therapy.

The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based therapies are emerging as promising alternatives for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the comparative efficacy of P-CAB-based therapy versus proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy in treating H. pylori infection remains uncertain.

Objectives

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based therapies, including Vonoprazan (VPZ) and Tegoprazan (TPZ), compared to PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. Subgroup analysis assessed the influence of drug history, experimental drug, treatment duration, combination therapies, and geographic regions on treatment outcomes.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

Comprehensive searches were conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up to January 1, 2024. The primary outcome was the eradication rate, analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary outcomes included adverse events. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the χ2 test and the I 2 test. I 2 > 50% or p < 0.05 indicated significant heterogeneity.

Results

The analysis totally included 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 37 studies and 8818 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection. Of these, 14 RCTs, including 20 studies and 4286 patients, compared P-CAB-based therapy with 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT). P-CAB-based therapy exhibited superior eradication rates compared to both 14-day BQT and PPI-based therapy (ITT analysis: 87.0% vs 79.8%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12, p < 0.0001; and 85.6% vs 77.8%, RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p < 0.00001, respectively). This enhanced efficacy was particularly pronounced in patients with clarithromycin-resistant infections (73.7% vs 41.5%, RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.20, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher eradication rates with P-CAB-based therapy in treatment-naïve participants, VPZ recipients, and those receiving 7- or 14-day regimens (dual, triple, or quadruple therapy). However, no significant differences were observed in treatment-experienced subgroups, TPZ recipients, or those on 10-day regimens. In addition, P-CAB-based therapy showed a lower incidence of adverse events than PPI-based treatments (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

P-CAB-based therapies are more effective than traditional PPI-based treatments for eradicating H. pylori infection, with a reduced incidence of adverse events.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42024503665.

Current research status and trends of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of acid-related diseases: a bibliometric analysis

Objective

To explore the current research status and trends of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the treatment of acid related diseases (ARDs) using bibliometric analysis.

Materials and methods

We collected publications related to P-CAB in the treatment of acid-related diseases in the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection from the establishment of the database to 30 June 2024. We evaluated the publication volume and citation status over the years using the WOS platform, and visualized the authors, countries, institutions, keywords, and citations of the publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer.

Results

This study included a total of 455 articles. The number of publications and citations related to research has been increasing year by year. The results show that the scholars with the highest number of publications mainly come from South Korea and Japan. Scholars such as Geun Seog Song, Bongtae Kim, and Nobuhiro Inatomi produced many works in related fields. The most popular drug in this field was vonoprazan, and research on this drug mainly focused on the effectiveness and safety evaluation of ARDs such as Helicobacter pylori infection, gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcers, etc. Researchers were concerned about the evaluation of treatment regimens and efficacy comparison between P-CABs and traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of ARDs. At the same time, researchers are also closely monitoring the potential adverse reactions and long-term adverse outcomes of clinical application of P-CABs for ARDs.

Conclusion

The clinical application of P-CABs, represented by vonoprazan, in ARDs is receiving widespread attention from researchers. The exploration of the application of this type of drug in ARDs is constantly expanding, and it is a research field with great clinical value and research potential.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing antibiotic resistance and the inadequate acid-suppressing effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), it is crucial to continuously optimize existing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based eradication regimens compared with traditional PPI-based regimens for the initial treatment of H. pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, searching seven electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating initial P-CAB-based H. pylori eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and patient compliance. We synthesized the effect sizes of the trials using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 54 RCTs involving 15,320 patients (74.9% male, mean age 30.2 years) were included in this study. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, VPZ-HD-dual, VPZ-triple, and VPZ-quadruple regimens demonstrated significantly higher eradication rates than PPI-triple, PPI-quadruple, and VPZ-dual regimens. Similar trends were observed in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Subgroup analysis indicated that poor patient compliance significantly reduced eradication rates. Resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly weakened the eradication effects of PPI-triple, TPZ-triple, and VPZ-triple regimens. Additionally, the eradication rates for 7-day regimens were significantly lower than those for 14-day or 10-day regimens, but there was no significant difference between the eradication rates of 10-day and 14-day regimens. Notably, the risk of adverse events with VPZ-HD-dual was significantly lower than with VPZ-quadruple.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan combined with high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy not only provides satisfactory eradication rates but also exhibits lower adverse event rates and good patient compliance, indicating its potential as a promising regimen for further promotion.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Integrating Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Into Clinical Practice: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to summarize the available evidence and offer expert Best Practice Advice on the integration of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the clinical management of foregut disorders, specifically including gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and peptic ulcer disease.

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Governing Board and CPU Committee to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership. This CPU expert review underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through the standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were developed based on review of the published literature and expert consensus opinion. Because formal systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Based on nonclinical factors (including cost, greater obstacles to obtaining medication, and fewer long-term safety data), clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as initial therapy for acid-related conditions in which clinical superiority has not been shown. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Based on current costs in the United States, even modest clinical superiority of P-CABs over double-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may not make P-CABs cost-effective as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy for patients with uninvestigated heartburn symptoms or nonerosive reflux disease. Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line on-demand therapy for patients with heartburn symptoms who have previously responded to antisecretory therapy, their rapid onset of acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with milder erosive esophagitis (EE) (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade A/B EE). Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians may use P-CABs as a therapeutic option for the healing and maintenance of healing in patients with more severe EE (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade C/D EE). However, given the markedly higher costs of the P-CAB presently available in the United States and the lack of randomized comparisons with double-dose PPIs, it is not clear that the benefits in endoscopic outcomes over standard-dose PPIs justify the routine use of P-CABs as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should use P-CABs in place of PPIs in eradication regimens for most patients with H pylori infection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in the treatment or prophylaxis of peptic ulcer disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and high-risk stigmata, their rapid and potent acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population.

Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study in Fujian, China

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different dosages of TA dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted at four centers in Fujian, China. H. pylori-infective patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of the following treatments: bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT, esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily + potassium bismuth citrate 240 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g twice daily + clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily), tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapies (TA-qd, tegoprazan 50 mg once daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily; TA-bid, tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily) for 14 days. The primary outcome was noninferiority in eradication rates of the different TA groups compared to the BQT group. Secondary outcomes encompassed an assessment of adverse reactions and clinical symptom relief. Additionally, exploratory outcomes were focused on the shifts in gut microbiota and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates in the BQT group, TA-qd group, and TA-bid group were 85.05% (91/107), 85.98% (92/107), and 85.98% (92/107) in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI -8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012); 91.00% (91/100), 91.09% (92/101), and 92.93% (92/99) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (mITT) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -7.81% to 7.98%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI -5.62% to 9.48%, noninferiority p < 0.001); 90.81% (89/98), 91.00% (91/100), and 93.81% (91/97) in the per-protocol analysis (PP) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -7.83% to 8.19%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI 4.46% to 10.46%, noninferiority p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse reactions in the TA-qd and TA-bid groups was significantly lower than in the BQT group (13.33%, 14.56%, and 27.18%, respectively; p = 0.017). The complete remissions of clinical symptoms for BQT, TA-qd, and TA-bid were 36.89%, 65.71%, and 68.93%, respectively, had significant differences (p < 0.001). Two weeks of TA therapy altered gut microbiota diversity and composition, but that recovered 4 weeks after discontinuation. The cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) for BQT, TA-qd, and TA-bid were 1.85 CNY, 2.08 CNY, and 3.69 CNY, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both TA dual therapies provided satisfactory eradication rates of > 90% for eradicating H. pylori, fewer adverse reactions, and greater clinical symptom relief compared to BQT, with a mild, reversible impact on gut microbiota. In addition, the TA dual therapy with low doses of tegoprazan showed better cost-effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register and registration No.: ChiCTR2300071997.

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

PBPK modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 genotypes

Pantoprazole is used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), maintain healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), and control symptoms related to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Pantoprazole is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, converting to 4'-demethyl pantoprazole. CYP2C19 is a genetically polymorphic enzyme, and the genetic polymorphism affects the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of pantoprazole. In this study, we aimed to establish the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in populations with various CYP2C19 metabolic activities. A comprehensive investigation of previous reports and drug databases was conducted to collect the clinical pharmacogenomic data, physicochemical data, and disposition properties of pantoprazole, and the collected data were used for model establishment. The model was evaluated by comparing the predicted plasma concentration-time profiles and/or pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC and Cmax) with the clinical observation results. The predicted plasma concentration-time profiles in different CYP2C19 phenotypes properly captured the observed profiles. All fold error values for AUC and Cmax were included in the two-fold range. Consequently, the minimal PBPK model for pantoprazole related to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism was properly established and it can predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 phenotypes. The present model can broaden the insight into the individualized pharmacotherapy for pantoprazole.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to assess the drug-drug interactions of anaprazole with clarithromycin and amoxicillin in patients undergoing eradication therapy of H. pylori infection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.

METHODS

The PBPK models for anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin were constructed using the GastroPlus™ software (Version 9.7) based on the physicochemical data and PK parameters obtained from literature, then were optimized and validated in healthy subjects to predict the plasma concentration-time profiles of these three drugs and assess the predictive performance of each model. According to the analysis of the properties of each drug, the developed and validated models were applied to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin.

RESULTS

The developed PBPK models properly described the pharmacokinetics of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin well, and all predicted PK parameters (Cmax,ss, AUC0-τ,ss) ratios were within 2.0-fold of the observed values. Furthermore, the application of these models to predict the anaprazole-clarithromycin and anaprazole-amoxicillin DDIs demonstrates their good performance, with the predicted DDI Cmax,ss ratios and DDI AUC0-τ,ss ratios within 1.25-fold of the observed values, and all predicted DDI Cmax,ss, and AUC0-τ,ss ratios within 2.0-fold. The simulated results show no need to adjust the dosage when co-administered with anaprazole in patients undergoing eradication therapy of H. pylori infection since the dose remained in the therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

The whole-body PBPK models of anaprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin were built and qualified, which can predict DDIs that are mediated by gastric pH change and inhibition of metabolic enzymes, providing a mechanistic understanding of the DDIs observed in the clinic of clarithromycin, amoxicillin with anaprazole.

Prediction of the Drug–Drug Interaction Potential between Tegoprazan and Amoxicillin/Clarithromycin Using the Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker. This study investigated the effect of drug–drug interaction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan co-administered with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, the first-line therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, using physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling. The previously reported tegoprazan PBPK/PD model was modified and applied. The clarithromycin PBPK model was developed based on the model provided by the SimCYP® compound library. The amoxicillin model was constructed using the middle-out approach. All of the observed concentration–time profiles were covered well by the predicted profiles with the 5th and 95th percentiles. The mean ratios of predicted to observed PK parameters, including the area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), and clearance, were within the 30% intervals for the developed models. Two-fold ratios of predicted fold-changes of Cmax and AUC from time 0 to 24 h to observed data were satisfied. The predicted PD endpoints, including median intragastric pH and percentage holding rate at pH above 4 or 6 on day 1 and day 7, were close to the corresponding observed data. This investigation allows evaluation of the effects of CYP3A4 perpetrators on tegoprazan PK and PD changes, thus providing clinicians with the rationale for co-administration dosing adjustment.

Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Tegoprazan: Application for the Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions with CYP3A4 Perpetrators

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) developed by CJ Healthcare (Korea) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and helicobacter pylori infections. Tegoprazan is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Considering the therapeutic indications, tegoprazan is likely to be administered in combination with various drugs. Therefore, the investigation of drug-drug interactions (DDI) between tegoprazan and CYP3A4 perpetrators is imperative. In the present study, we first aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PK) model for tegoprazan and its major metabolite, M1, using PK-Sim^®. This model was applied to predict the DDI between tegoprazan and CYP3A4 perpetrators. Clarithromycin, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, and rifampicin, a strong inducer of CYP3A4, were selected as case studies. Our results show that clarithromycin significantly increased the exposure of tegoprazan. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and C_max of tegoprazan in the steady state increased up to 4.54- and 2.05-fold, respectively, when tegoprazan (50 mg, twice daily) was coadministered with clarithromycin (500 mg, three times daily). Rifampicin significantly reduced the exposure of tegoprazan. The AUC and C_max of tegoprazan were reduced by 5.71- and 3.51-fold when tegoprazan was coadministered with rifampicin (600 mg, once daily). Due to the high DDI potential, the comedication of tegoprazan with CYP3A4 perpetrators should be controlled. The dosage adjustment for each individual is suggested.

Triple Therapy-Based on Tegoprazan, a New Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We examined the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan as a part of first-line triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study was performed to evaluate whether tegoprazan (50 mg)-based triple therapy (TPZ) was noninferior to lansoprazole (30 mg)- based triple therapy (LPZ) (with amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg; all administered twice daily for 7 days) for treating H. pylori. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amoxicillin and clarithromycin, and underlying gastric diseases.

RESULTS

In total, 350 H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to the TPZ or LPZ group. The H. pylori eradication rates in the TPZ and LPZ groups were 62.86% (110/175) and 60.57% (106/175) in an intention-to-treat analysis and 69.33% (104/150) and 67.33% (101/150) in a per-protocol analysis (non-inferiority test, p=0.009 and p=0.013), respectively. Subgroup analyses according to MICs or CYP2C19 did not show remarkable differences in eradication rate. Both first-line triple therapies were well-tolerated with no notable differences.

CONCLUSIONS

TPZ is as effective as proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy and is as safe as first-line H. pylori eradication therapy but does not overcome the clarithromycin resistance of H. pylori in Korea (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03317223).

Integration of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model for Tegoprazan and Its Metabolite: Application for Predicting Food Effect and Intragastric pH Alterations

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for tegoprazan and its major metabolite M1 was developed to predict PK and PD profiles under various scenarios. The PBPK model for tegoprazan and M1 was developed and predicted using the SimCYP^® simulator and verified using clinical study data obtained after a single administration of tegoprazan. The established PBPK/PD model was used to predict PK profiles after repeated administrations of tegoprazan, postprandial PK profiles, and intragastric pH changes. The predicted tegoprazan and M1 concentration-time profiles fit the observed profiles well. The arithmetic mean ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the predicted to observed values for the area under the curve (AUC_{0-24 h}), maximum plasma drug concentration (C_max), and clearance (CL) for tegoprazan and M1 were within a 30% interval. Delayed time of maximum concentration (T_max) and decreased C_max were predicted in the postprandial PK profiles compared with the fasted state. This PBPK/PD model may be used to predict PK profiles after repeated tegoprazan administrations and to predict differences in physiological factors in the gastrointestinal tract or changes in gastric acid pH after tegoprazan administration.

Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Tegoprazan Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of tegoprazan and to predict the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between tegoprazan and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 perpetrators. The PBPK model of tegoprazan was developed using SimCYP Simulator^® and verified by comparing the model-predicted pharmacokinetics (PKs) of tegoprazan with the observed data from phase 1 clinical studies, including DDI studies. DDIs between tegoprazan and three CYP3A4 perpetrators were predicted by simulating the difference in tegoprazan exposure with and without perpetrators, after multiple dosing for a clinically used dose range. The final PBPK model adequately predicted the biphasic distribution profiles of tegoprazan and DDI between tegoprazan and clarithromycin. All ratios of the predicted-to-observed PK parameters were between 0.5 and 2.0. In DDI simulation, systemic exposure to tegoprazan was expected to increase about threefold when co-administered with the maximum recommended dose of clarithromycin or ketoconazole. Meanwhile, tegoprazan exposure was expected to decrease to ~30% when rifampicin was co-administered. Based on the simulation by the PBPK model, it is suggested that the DDI potential be considered when tegoprazan is used with CYP3A4 perpetrator, as the acid suppression effect of tegoprazan is known to be associated with systemic exposure.