Perspectives of US women participating in a candidate PrEP study: adherence, acceptability and future use intentions

Understanding PrEP Contemplation Among Black Women: Insights from a Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

The lack of engagement and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Black women in the Southern United States is an enduring health disparity. Guided by an integrated theoretical framework and the PrEP Cascade, this qualitative inquiry aimed to explore Black women's motivation and decision-making regarding PrEP engagement and identify strategies to enhance PrEP messaging and uptake for those with indication(s) for PrEP use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve semi-structured Zoom interviews were conducted between February 2020 and March 2022. Participants were sampled from a larger pool in an online survey study about factors associated with PrEP uptake among Black women. Interviews explored whether women started PrEP (or not) within 3 months after learning about PrEP in the survey and explored their reasoning. Data analysis included quantitative descriptive statistics and directed content analysis.

RESULTS

None of the 12 women had started PrEP at the time of the interview. Two were in discussions with their provider about PrEP (stage 3: PrEParation), and one intended to initiate PrEP within the next 3 months (i.e., thinking about it). Two main themes emerged as their reasons for not starting PrEP: current relationship status and PrEP information (awareness, knowledge, and literacy). Participants expressed a lack of trust in PrEP due to insufficient information while anticipated challenges in obtaining PrEP included cost and the patient-provider relationship (engagement and communication).

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight missed opportunities to improve PrEP use among Black women within the PrEP contemplation phase, emphasizing the need for improved PrEP messaging and tailored PrEP programs and/or interventions for this group.

Barriers to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Women in the US: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction

The high acquisition rate of HIV infection among women in the United States is concerning. Despite the FDA approving the first pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug in 2012, PrEP utilization remains significantly lower among women. This literature review aims to analyze the current body of research concerning HIV PrEP usage among women in the US.

Methods

A search of three medical databases was conducted. After the screening, 19 studies were selected for analysis. A risk of bias assessment was performed.

Results

A final set of records meeting the inclusion criteria (n=19) was included in the review for data collection and analysis. The study methodology for these research articles included interview-based designs (semi-structured and brief formats) in 1-on-1 meetings, focus groups, surveys, and retrospective data analysis. Participants' HIV risk characteristics were reported by way of sexual behavior, drug use, combined sexual behavior and drug use, and living in a high HIV rate neighborhood. Nineteen themes were identified and organized into three categories: (1) Common medication administration barriers, (2) PrEP-specific barriers, and (3) Situational barriers. The three most common themes reported by participants included a concern about side effects, low perceived risks of HIV, and lack of PrEP information. The CASP Qualitative Checklist and risk assessment summary showed acceptable validity among studies.

Discussion

This review identifies significant barriers hindering women's PrEP utilization, which would benefit from more prevalent stakeholder communication and education directed to at-risk populations. Inconsistently reported descriptive data on participants and the low patient populations make it difficult to generalize outcomes.

Assessing Patient Acceptance of an Automated Algorithm to Identify Ciswomen for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

The use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in cisgender women (ciswomen) lags far behind their need. Data elements from the electronic medical record (EMR), including diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (STI), can be incorporated into automated algorithms for identifying clients who are most vulnerable to HIV and would benefit from PrEP. However, it is unknown how women feel about the use of such technology. In this study, we assessed women's attitudes and opinions about an automated EMR-based HIV risk algorithm and determined if their perspectives varied by level of HIV risk. Respondents were identified using best practice alerts or referral to a clinic for STI symptoms from January to December 2021 in Chicago, IL. Participants were asked about HIV risk factors, their self-perceived HIV risk, and their thoughts regarding an algorithm to identify ciswomen who could benefit from PrEP. Most of the 112 women who completed the survey (85%) thought they were at low risk for HIV, despite high rates of STI diagnoses. The majority were comfortable with the use of this algorithm, but their comfort level dropped when asked about the algorithm identifying them specifically. Ciswomen had mixed feelings about the use of an automated HIV risk algorithm, citing it as a potentially helpful and empowering tool for women, yet raising concerns about invasion of privacy and potential racial bias. Clinics must balance the benefits of using an EMR-based algorithm for ciswomen with their concerns about privacy and bias to improve PrEP uptake among particularly vulnerable women.

Influence of Participant Perceptions of Adherence-Related Interactions with Study/Study Team on Drug Levels: HPTN069 Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence Experiences While on Study

Adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) study drug is critical for safety, tolerability, and efficacy trials, and may be affected by how adherence is communicated by the study staff to trial participants. Increasingly, clinical trials investigating PrEP are creating and implementing 'participant-centered' approaches that discuss potential non-adherence neutrally (without negative judgement) and support efforts to adhere versus insisting on perfect adherence. In the HPTN069/ACTG A5305 study, we evaluated participant experiences of potentially negative adherence-related interactions with study teams using ten items to characterize the frequency of such experiences. We related these individual items and a combined set of seven negative experience items (total negative experience score) to drug concentrations (detectable or consistent with daily-dosing). The exploratory analyses used logistic regression for each experience item on the full sample and disaggregated by sex. Several experiences were related to drug detection and to daily-dosing, although more so for participants identifying as men than women. Total negative experience scores associated with not having detection drug concentrations for the full sample, and remained significant even when controlling for sex, age, and race. Daily dosing was associated with total negative experience score for men in the sample. Additional investigations into adherence-related interactions with study teams that are most problematic or helpful in general and uniquely for men and women are warranted.

Factors Associated with Planned Future Use of PrEP in the Next 3 Months and Likelihood to Use PrEP Among Black Cisgender HIV-negative Women in Texas

Identifying and then addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators is important to help increase pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among Black women vulnerable to HIV acquisition. The present cross-sectional study examined what factors were associated with future plans to use PrEP, and general likelihood to use it among a convenience sample of 152 adult, Black cisgender women from three metropolitan areas in Texas. The final multivariable logistic regression model revealed that relationship status (aOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p < 0.05), PrEP anticipated stigma (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10-0.78, p < 0.05), perceived discrimination (aOR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.21-0.78, p < 0.01) and interest in learning more about PrEP (aOR = 5.32, 95% CI: 2.60-10.9, p < 0.001) were associated with future plans to use PrEP. The final multivariable linear regression model with maximum likelihood estimation identified that perceived discrimination (β=-0.24, SE: -0.38 - -0.10, p < 0.01), perceived HIV risk (β = 0.33, SE: 0.18-0.49, p < 0.001), willingness to use PrEP with condoms (β = 1.26, SE: 0.94-1.60, p < 0.001), and comfort communicating about PrEP with a provider (β = 0.23, SE: 0.06-0.41, p < 0.01) were associated with general likelihood to use PrEP. Findings reveal key factors that warrant further attention and examination toward improving PrEP use within this population.

Intention to Initiate HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Cisgender Women in a High HIV Prevalence U.S. City

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to identify the individual, interpersonal, community, health-system, and structural factors that influence HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation among cisgender women seeking sexual and reproductive health care in a high HIV prevalence community to inform future clinic-based PrEP interventions.

METHODS

We collected anonymous, tablet-based questionnaires from a convenience sample of cisgender women in family planning and sexual health clinics in the District of Columbia. The survey used the lens of the socio-ecological model to measure individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and structural factors surrounding intention to initiate PrEP. The survey queried demographics, behavioral exposure to HIV, perceived risk of HIV acquisition, a priori awareness of PrEP, intention to initiate PrEP, and factors influencing intention to initiate PrEP.

RESULTS

A total of 1437 cisgender women completed the survey. By socio-ecological level, intention to initiate PrEP was associated with positive attitudes toward PrEP (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.15) and higher self-efficacy (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.72) on the individual level, perceived future utilization of PrEP among peers and low fear of shame/stigma (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.04) on the community level, and having discussed PrEP with a provider (OR. 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20-4.75) on the institutional level.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of multilevel, clinic-based interventions for cisgender women, which promote sex-positive and preventive PrEP messaging, peer navigation to destigmatize PrEP, and education and support for women's health medical providers in the provision of PrEP services for cisgender women.

Understanding Retention in the HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Cascade Among Cisgender Women

HIV remains a significant public health concern in the United States, with 34,800 new cases diagnosed in 2019; of those, 18% were among women. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine is effective and safe, reducing HIV transmission by up to 92% in women. Though studies demonstrate low rates of PrEP adherence among cisgender women prescribed oral PrEP, little is known about the factors that shape PrEP continuation among them. This study focuses on understanding the experiences of cisgender women who have initiated PrEP to gain insight into the factors that shape PrEP continuation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with (N = 20) women who had been prescribed oral PrEP. Interviews were guided by the social-ecological framework to identify multilevel factors affecting PrEP continuation; we specifically examined the experience of engagement and retention in the PrEP cascade. We recruited women who had been prescribed oral PrEP by a government-sponsored sexual health center or a hospital-based family planning clinic in Washington, DC. Factors facilitating PrEP continuation included a positive emotional experience associated with PrEP use, high perceived risk of HIV acquisition, and high-quality communication with health care providers. The most common reason for PrEP discontinuation was low perceived HIV risk (n = 11). Other factors influencing discontinuation were side effects, a negative emotional experience while using PrEP, and negative interactions with the health care system. This study underscores the importance of specific multi-level factors, including the provision of high-quality communication designed to resonate with women and shared decision making between women and their health care providers.

"Let's take that [stop sign] down." Provider perspectives on barriers to and opportunities for PrEP prescription to African American girls and young women in Alabama

HIV disproportionately impacts many groups, including Black adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 13-24 living in the Deep South. Current prevention efforts have the potential to further exacerbate disparities within this population as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized by Black AGYW in the South. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) grounded in Andersen's Model of Healthcare Utilization exploring providers' PrEP prescribing practices to Black AGYW in Alabama. Eleven providers completed IDIs exploring providers' PrEP prescription knowledge and experiences. Cross-cutting themes included: (1) Community and provider-level stigmas (including those propagated by legislation) relating to HIV and sexuality limit sexual health discussions with Black AGYW clients; (2) Low PrEP knowledge and comfort with guidelines limits PrEP conversations and reinforces low uptake and prescriptions; (3) Healthcare systems and structural barriers impede PrEP access for youth. Multi-level (structural, community, and provider) barriers to PrEP prescription demands high activation energy for providers to prescribe PrEP. We present recommendations in training in sexual health assessment, updates to PrEP guidelines to accommodate risk assessment appropriate for AGYW, and increased implementation science focused on PrEP prescription for Black AGYW in order to reduce HIV incidence for this population.

Let Me Prep You to PREP Me: Amplifying the Voices of Black Women and Their Providers to Consider PrEP as an HIV Prevention Option

Despite the high efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in preventing HIV acquisition, PrEP uptake among Black cisgender women remains low. Our qualitative study assessed Black cisgender women's perspectives, attitudes, and acceptability towards PrEP, in addition to exploring PrEP-related attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to PrEP access among health care staff. This study was conducted to ascertain data to inform the development of our HIV prevention app-Savvy HER-which is being designed for Black cisgender women. Our findings indicated that Black women had low levels of PrEP acceptability and high levels of misconceptions, inaccurate knowledge, and stigma towards PrEP. Health care providers in our sample confirmed barriers of stigma, misconceptions, and knowledge among their patients coupled with difficulty accessing PrEP due to structural barriers. Our study indicated that there is a critical need to heighten Black cisgender women's PrEP knowledge and HIV risk perception in order to increase PrEP acceptability and uptake.

US Black cisgender women and pre-exposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus prevention: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Black cisgender women in the United States experience a disproportionate burden of human immunodeficiency virus acquisition. Pre-exposure prophylaxis is an effective oral daily medication that reduces the risk of human immunodeficiency virus through sex by 99% when taken as prescribed. However, less than 2% of eligible Black cisgender women take pre-exposure prophylaxis. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe the types of research studies done in this area, gaps in knowledge, and potential areas of research needed to increase pre-exposure prophylaxis use among Black cisgender women in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted our search in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Scopus (Elsevier) using a combination of keywords and database-specific subject headings for the following concepts: pre-exposure prophylaxis, African American/Black or minority, and women. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute's Reviewers' Manual process for Scoping Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews to ensure comprehensive and standardized reporting of each part of the review.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included in the final review. Results of the study were classified according to the three phases of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention Cascade-demand side, supply side, and adherence and retention. The majority of studies (n = 24, 41%) were cross-sectional quantitative surveys and 43 (34%) focused on the demand-side phase of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention Cascade. Fifty-eight percent of studies either assessed women's pre-exposure prophylaxis knowledge, attitudes, and intentions to use, or assessed perceived barriers and facilitators. Seven studies (12%) tested pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence among Black cisgender women.

CONCLUSION

This review found multiple missed opportunities to increase women's demand for pre-exposure prophylaxis and health care provider screening and referral for pre-exposure prophylaxis. Additional studies are needed to effectively assess pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence among Black cisgender women.

Point-of-Care Test for Assessing Tenofovir Adherence: Feasibility and Recommendations from Women in an Oral PrEP Program in Kenya and Their Healthcare Providers

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective HIV prevention modality when taken as recommended. Women in sub-Saharan Africa may have adherence challenges that remain undisclosed to providers. Real-time measures that identify non-adherence can allow for immediate exploration of adherence challenges, counseling and interventions. We conducted a formative qualitative study in Kenya to explore oral PrEP experiences and reactions to a point-of-care urine test (UT) identifying recent (past 4 days) non-adherence to tenofovir-based PrEP among female PrEP users (25 in-depth interviews; 4 focus groups) and health care provider (10 key informant interviews). Findings indicate that use of the UT would be highly feasible in the context of regular PrEP care, largely acceptable to clients and providers, and could improve adherence. Clients emphasized the need for transparent client-centered strategies in delivering results. This formative study informs the development of tools to implement this point-of-care UT in future interventional studies and clinical settings.

Health care providers' attitudes toward and experiences delivering oral PrEP to adolescent girls and young women in Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe

Background

In Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) at high risk of HIV. Health providers play a critical role in the uptake and effective use of sexual and reproductive health services; however, few published studies have explored providers’ attitudes toward and experiences delivering PrEP to AGYW.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study, interviewing 113 providers at 36 public, private, and nongovernmental health facilities in Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe that were offering PrEP during the research period or were likely to offer PrEP in the future. Data were coded in NVivo 11, and an applied thematic analysis was conducted.

Results

Most providers preferred that adolescent girls wait until age 18 to have sex but acknowledged that many girls younger than 18 could benefit from oral PrEP. Their primary concern was whether adolescent girls would be able to take PrEP daily, especially if they do not tell their parents or partners they are using it. Providers reported that it was more challenging to deliver PrEP and other HIV services to girls younger than 18. Those with experience providing PrEP pointed to stigma and lack of PrEP awareness in communities as two primary barriers to PrEP uptake and use.

Conclusions

Providers were generally accepting of oral PrEP as an HIV prevention option for AGYW; however, many had negative attitudes about adolescent girls being sexually active and concerns about whether they could take PrEP daily. Results were used to update national PrEP training materials to address negative provider attitudes about PrEP use by AGYW.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06978-0.

Assessing Provider-, Clinic-, and Structural-Level Barriers and Recommendations to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake: A Qualitative Investigation Among Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence, Intimate Partner Violence Service Providers, and Healthcare Providers

Intimate partner violence (IPV) relates to HIV susceptibility and acquisition. Existing research examined barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among women but few studies assess uptake and delivery among IPV service providers, along with provider-, clinic-, and structural-level barriers. We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with PrEP-eligible cisgender heterosexual women experiencing IPV, Reproductive Health providers, PrEP providers, and IPV service providers in Northeast US. Systems theory was used to examine barriers from individuals who either work closely with or are part of the population. The framework method was used to draw descriptive and explanatory conclusions. Findings suggest limited knowledge for Reproductive Health and IPV Service Providers. Providers often did not feel equipped to discussed PrEP in visits or focused efforts solely on safety. Expanding PrEP awareness is necessary and marketing should include women. Future research should investigate how providers can work collaboratively across sectors to ensure women receive comprehensive trauma-informed care.

"Yes, I'm interested in taking PrEP!": PrEP interest among women respondents to the European community-based survey "Flash! PrEP in Europe"

The World Health Organization recommends pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all populations at substantial risk of HIV infection, including women. However, data regarding PrEP interest among women is lacking, particularly in Europe. Factors associated with interest in using PrEP were assessed among women respondents to the Flash! PrEP in Europe (FPIE) survey. This community-based cross-sectional study, conducted in 12 European countries, aimed to assess PrEP knowledge and interest. "High objective risk" (HOR) was assessed using established risk criteria following EACS and CDC guidelines. Factors associated with interest in using PrEP were assessed in univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Among 678 women, 12.5% (n = 85) were considered at HOR, 46.8% (n = 317) indicated prior PrEP knowledge and 18.0% (n = 122) reported interest in using PrEP. Among women at HOR, 40.0% (n = 34) were interested in PrEP. Factors significantly associated with PrEP interest in the final multivariable model were: younger age (18-29 years) (aOR 1.91[95CI: 1.07; 3.41]), bad self-perceived financial status (1.84[1.09; 3.11]), migrant status (south to north) (2.87[1.05; 7.89]), single or dating relationship status (1.93[1.23; 3.03]), sexual abuse history (1.86[1.17; 2.97]), "rather high"/ "high" self-perceived HIV risk (3.21[1.32; 7.81]), and HOR (2.49[1.42; 4.35]). These results show that women at HOR and those who perceived themselves to be at high risk are interested in using PrEP. There is a critical need for targeted information and improved access to PrEP to increase uptake of this HIV prevention tool to meet PrEP interest among women.

Achievements and gaps to provide pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for women across the European Region - Results from a European survey study

Introduction

The use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective prevention option to all people at substantial risk of HIV acquisition, irrespective of gender. However, in most European countries PrEP services focus on key populations, in particular men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aims to explore PrEP availability and implementation for women across the European region.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all members of Women Against Viruses in Europe (WAVE) from 50 countries in September 2019. It consisted of 19 questions, including both multiple choice and free text answers.

Results

In total, responses from 34 countries were included in the study (Western Europe n ​= ​12, Central Europe ​= ​12, Eastern Europe n ​= ​6). PrEP was accessible in 30 WHO European countries. More than half of them stated that PrEP was available for all groups at-risk of HIV acquisition (n ​= ​18), while in many countries PrEP was only available to MSM and transgender persons. Two-thirds of country respondents confirmed the availability of a national guideline for PrEP (n ​= ​23), of which six countries had specific recommendations for PrEP in women. The most cited obstacles for PrEP access were lack of information about PrEP, lack of political support, and high cost for the individual. Fifteen country respondents stated that there were specific obstacles for PrEP access for women, such as guidelines prioritizing MSM, women not being seen as a target population for PrEP, and lack of knowledge about which subgroup of women would benefit most from PrEP. Seven countries had made efforts to encourage women’s access to PrEP, most of which were individually based or initiated by local NGOs.

Conclusions

PrEP is an important addition to HIV combination prevention. Women’s access to PrEP in Europe remains limited. Women are often not included in the guidelines or targeted with education or information, resulting in a general lack of information about the use of PrEP for women.