1
|
Asafu Adjaye Frimpong G, Aboagye E, Asante E, Appiah KAA, Owusu-Afriyie O, Asare AO, Atuobi D, Akpaloo BD, Antwi B. Advancing Prostate Cancer Staging: A Single-Step Approach With Bi-parametric and Whole-Body Diffusion MRI in an African Cohort. Cureus 2024; 16:e59470. [PMID: 38826908 PMCID: PMC11142458 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To document our initial experience using whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) as a single exam in the staging of biopsy-proven prostate cancers. METHODS This retrospective study involved 120 African men with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer (PCa). All the participants had a single exam that included both a bpMRI and a WB-DWI/MRI. The results were analyzed based on the American Urological Association's risk stratification system and evaluated using descriptive statistics. RESULTS The combined imaging approach confirmed PCa in all cases, identifying pelvic lymph node metastases in 21 (17.5%) patients. Among 72 high-risk patients, bpMRI+WB-DWI/MRI detected pelvic lymph node metastases in 18 (25.0%), bone metastases in 15 (20.8%), retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in six (8.3%), and extraprostatic extension in 18 (25%), with no solid organ metastases observed. CONCLUSION The combination of WB-DWI/MRI and bpMRI in a single-step approach demonstrates diagnostic potential in primary prostate cancer staging for high-risk groups, with the added advantage of shorter examination times, lower patients' costs, and elimination of the risks of adverse events associated with the use of contrast agents and exposure to radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Asafu Adjaye Frimpong
- Radiology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GHA
- Radiology, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Evans Aboagye
- Research and Development, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Emmanuel Asante
- Research and Development, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| | | | - Osei Owusu-Afriyie
- Pathology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Adwoa O Asare
- Oncology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Dorcas Atuobi
- Radiology, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Bernard D Akpaloo
- Radiology, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| | - Bright Antwi
- Radiology, Spectra Health Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Kumasi, GHA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vulasala SS, Virarkar M, Karbasian N, Calimano-Ramirez LF, Daoud T, Amini B, Bhosale P, Javadi S. Whole-body MRI in oncology: A comprehensive review. Clin Imaging 2024; 108:110099. [PMID: 38401295 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) has cemented its position as a pivotal tool in oncological diagnostics. It offers unparalleled soft tissue contrast resolution and the advantage of sidestepping ionizing radiation. This review explores the diverse applications of WB-MRI in oncology. We discuss its transformative role in detecting and diagnosing a spectrum of cancers, emphasizing conditions like multiple myeloma and cancers with a proclivity for bone metastases. WB-MRI's capability to encompass the entire body in a singular scan has ushered in novel paradigms in cancer screening, especially for individuals harboring hereditary cancer syndromes or at heightened risk for metastatic disease. Additionally, its contribution to the clinical landscape, aiding in the holistic management of multifocal and systemic malignancies, is explored. The article accentuates the technical strides achieved in WB-MRI, its myriad clinical utilities, and the challenges in integration into standard oncological care. In essence, this review underscores the transformative potential of WB-MRI, emphasizing its promise as a cornerstone modality in shaping the future trajectory of cancer diagnostics and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Swarupa Vulasala
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
| | - Mayur Virarkar
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Niloofar Karbasian
- Department of Radiology, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Luis F Calimano-Ramirez
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Taher Daoud
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Behrang Amini
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ceranka J, Wuts J, Chiabai O, Lecouvet F, Vandemeulebroucke J. Computer-aided diagnosis of skeletal metastases in multi-parametric whole-body MRI. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2023; 242:107811. [PMID: 37742486 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
The confident detection of metastatic bone disease is essential to improve patients' comfort and increase life expectancy. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been successfully used for monitoring of metastatic bone disease, allowing for comprehensive and holistic evaluation of the total tumour volume and treatment response assessment. The major challenges of radiological reading of whole-body MRI come from the amount of data to be reviewed and the scattered distribution of metastases, often of complex shapes. This makes bone lesion detection and quantification demanding for a radiologist and prone to error. Additionally, whole-body MRI are often corrupted with multiple spatial and intensity distortions, which further degrade the performance of image reading and image processing algorithms. In this work we propose a fully automated computer-aided diagnosis system for the detection and segmentation of metastatic bone disease using whole-body multi-parametric MRI. The system consists of an extensive image preprocessing pipeline aiming at enhancing the image quality, followed by a deep learning framework for detection and segmentation of metastatic bone disease. The system outperformed state-of-the-art methodologies, achieving a detection sensitivity of 63% with a mean of 6.44 false positives per image, and an average lesion Dice coefficient of 0.53. A provided ablation study performed to investigate the relative importance of image preprocessing shows that introduction of region of interest mask and spatial registration have a significant impact on detection and segmentation performance in whole-body MRI. The proposed computer-aided diagnosis system allows for automatic quantification of disease infiltration and could provide a valuable tool during radiological examination of whole-body MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Ceranka
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium; imec, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium.
| | - Joris Wuts
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium; imec, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium; Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
| | - Ophélye Chiabai
- Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Lecouvet
- Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | - Jef Vandemeulebroucke
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Electronics and Informatics, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium; imec, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, B-3001, Belgium; Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Department of Radiology, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kawai T, Taguchi S, Nozaki K, Kimura N, Oshina T, Iwaki T, Matsui H, Niimi A, Kamei J, Akiyama Y, Yamada Y, Sato Y, Yamada D, Kaneko T, Sawayanagi S, Nakayama H, Minamimoto R, Yamashita H, Miyazaki H, Fujimura T, Nakagawa T, Kume H. Prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts the efficacy of site-directed therapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Int 2023; 11:239-246. [PMID: 38196558 PMCID: PMC10772157 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, site-directed therapies (SDTs) targeting progressive lesions in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer have attracted attention. However, whether they effectively treat oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. Here, we investigated the efficacy of SDT in patients with oligoprogressive CRPC and identified prognostic factors. Methods We reviewed 59 patients with oligoprogressive CRPC who underwent SDT targeting prostate or metastatic lesions between April 2014 and March 2022. We evaluated the associations between several pretreatment clinical variables and treatment procedures and a >50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to next treatment (TTNT). Results A PSA response of >50% was observed in 66% of patients. The median PFS and TTNT were 8.3 months and 9.9 months, respectively. Patients with PSA doubling time ≥6 months showed a higher >50% PSA response rate (87% vs. 45%; P < 0.001), longer PFS (median, 15.0 vs. 5.0 months; P < 0.001), and longer TTNT (median, 16.3 vs. 5.9 months; P < 0.001) than patients with PSA doubling time <6 months. In multivariate analyses, a PSA doubling time of ≥6 months independently predicted a >50% PSA response, favorable PFS, and TTNT (P = 0.037, 0.025, and 0.017, respectively). Conclusion PSA doubling time of ≥6 months may be a key indicator of the favorable efficacy of SDT for oligoprogressive CRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keina Nozaki
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kimura
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Oshina
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Iwaki
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hotaka Matsui
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aya Niimi
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kamei
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Akiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yamada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Subaru Sawayanagi
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidetsugu Nakayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryogo Minamimoto
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyo Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Fujimura
- Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdel-Aty H, O'Shea L, Amos C, Brown LC, Grist E, Attard G, Clarke N, Cross W, Parker C, Parmar M, As NV, James N. The STAMPEDE2 Trial: a Site Survey of Current Patterns of Care, Access to Imaging and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e628-e635. [PMID: 37507278 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The forthcoming STAMPEDE2 trial has three comparisons in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. We aim to determine clinical practices among STAMPEDE trial investigators for access to imaging and therapeutic choices and explore their interest in participation in STAMPEDE2. MATERIALS AND METHODS The survey was developed and distributed online to 120 UK STAMPEDE trial sites. Recipients were invited to complete the survey between 16 and 30 May 2022. The survey consisted of 30 questions in five sections on access to stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), 177lutetium-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617), choice of systemic therapies and use of positron emission tomography/computerised tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS From 58/120 (48%) sites, 64 respondents completed the survey: 55/64 (86%) respondents were interested to participate in SABR, 44/64 (69%) in 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 56/64 (87.5%) in niraparib with abiraterone comparisons; 45/64 (70%) respondents had access to bone, spine and lymph node metastases SABR delivery and 7/64 (11%) to 177Lu-PSMA-617. In addition to androgen deprivation therapy, 60/64 (94%) respondents used androgen receptor signalling inhibitors and 46/64 (72%) used docetaxel; 29/64 (45%) respondents would consider triplet therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signalling inhibitors and docetaxel. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography was available to 62/64 (97%) respondents and requested by 45/64 (70%) respondents for disease uncertainty on conventional imaging and 39/64 (61%) at disease relapse. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging was available to 24/64 (38%) respondents and requested by 13/64 (20%) respondents in highly selected patients. In low-volume disease, 38/64 (59%) respondents requested scans at baseline and disease relapse. In high-volume disease, 29/64 (45%) respondents requested scans at baseline, best response (at prostate-specific antigen nadir) and disease relapse; 54/64 (84%) respondents requested computerised tomography and bone scan for best response assessment. CONCLUSION There is noteworthy disparity in clinical practice across current study sites, however most have expressed an interest in participation in the forthcoming STAMPEDE2 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Abdel-Aty
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
| | - L O'Shea
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - C Amos
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - L C Brown
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - E Grist
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - G Attard
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Clarke
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - W Cross
- Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - C Parker
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Parmar
- The Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - N Vas As
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N James
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reina Y, Villaquirán C, García-Perdomo HA. Advances in high-risk localized prostate cancer: Staging and management. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47:100993. [PMID: 37418998 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Nearly 15% of individuals with localized prostate cancer are identified as high risk for recurrence and progression of the disease, which is why the correct staging is vital for the definition of correct treatment-also developing novel therapeutic strategies to find a balance between getting better outcomes without sacrificing the quality of life (QoL). In this narrative review, we introduced the current standards of staging and primary treatment of high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa), based on international guidelines and arguments in the debate, under the light of the most recent literature. It brings essential tools such as PSMA PET/CT and different nomograms (Briganti. MSKCC, Gandaglia) for accurate staging and selecting wisely the definitive therapy. Even though there is a broad discussion over the best local treatment in curative-intent treatment, it looks more important to define which patient profile would adapt correctly to every different treatment, highlighting the benefits and superior outcomes with multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeison Reina
- Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia; UROGIV Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Catalina Villaquirán
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
- UROGIV Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia; Division of Urology/Urooncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reginelli A, Patanè V, Urraro F, Russo A, De Chiara M, Clemente A, Atripaldi U, Balestrucci G, Buono M, D'ippolito E, Grassi R, D'onofrio I, Napolitano S, Troiani T, De Vita F, Ciardiello F, Nardone V, Cappabianca S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Bone Metastases Treated with Radiotherapy in Palliative Intent: A Multicenter Prospective Study on Clinical and Instrumental Evaluation Assessment Concordance (MARTE Study). Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2334. [PMID: 37510078 PMCID: PMC10378594 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis to bone is a common occurrence among epithelial tumors, with a high incidence rate in the Western world. As a result, bone lesions are a significant burden on the healthcare system, with a high morbidity index. These injuries are often symptomatic and can lead to functional limitations, which in turn cause reduced mobility in patients. Additionally, they can lead to secondary complications such as pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia, or bone marrow suppression. The treatment of bone metastases requires collaboration between multiple healthcare professionals, including oncologists, orthopedists, neurosurgeons, physiatrists, and radiotherapists. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between two methods used to assess local control. Specifically, the study aims to determine if a reduction in the volume of bone lesions corresponds to better symptomatic control in the clinical management of patients, and vice versa. To achieve this objective, the study evaluates morphological criteria by comparing pre- and post-radiotherapy treatment imaging using MRI and RECIST 1.1 criteria. MRI without contrast is the preferred diagnostic imaging method, due to its excellent tolerance by patients, the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation, and the avoidance of paramagnetic contrast media side effects. This imaging modality allows for accurate assessment of bone lesions. One of the secondary objectives of this study is to identify potentially useful parameters that can distinguish patients into two classes: "good" and "poor" responders to treatment, as reported by previous studies in the literature. These parameters can be evaluated from the imaging examinations by analyzing morphological changes and radiomic features on different sequences, such as T1, STIR (short tau inversion recovery), and DWI-MRI (diffusion-weighted).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Vittorio Patanè
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco De Chiara
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Alfredo Clemente
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Atripaldi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Balestrucci
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Buono
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Emma D'ippolito
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Ida D'onofrio
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Teresa Troiani
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nishimura K. Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. J Bone Miner Metab 2023; 41:317-326. [PMID: 37162606 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-023-01435-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Progression of bone metastases is the primary cause of death in prostate cancer, and skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone can impair patients' quality of life. Over the past decade, the development of cytotoxic agents, androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), and radioligand therapies has prolonged overall survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases and reduced the risk of SREs. The use of bone-modifying agents has also contributed to the reduced risk of SREs. Initial use of a cytotoxic agent, docetaxel, or an ARAT agent with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the current approach to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, there is no consensus on the optimal medication for upfront use in combination with ADT, or on specific patient selection. Recently, next-generation imaging modalities, such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography have been utilized to detect bone metastases at an early stage. In addition, metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has been attempted. In the future, patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer will be divided into subgroups and their treatment options will be tailored to their specific characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cruz IAN, Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Lederman HM, Nico MAC, Ormond Filho AG, Guimarães JB. Whole-Body MRI in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Comprehensive Review with Recommendations. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220107. [PMID: 37144975 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body (WB) MRI has emerged as an attractive method for oncologic evaluation, potentially replacing conventional imaging modalities and providing a one-step wide-coverage assessment of both the skeleton and soft tissues. In addition to providing anatomic information, WB MRI may also yield a functional analysis with the inclusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI translates microstructural changes, resulting in an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. WB MRI (with DWI) offers comparable accuracy to PET/CT and has the advantage of avoiding ionizing radiation. Technological advances and the development of faster protocols have prompted greater accessibility of WB MRI, with growing applications in routine practice for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer. This review discusses the technical considerations, clinical applications, and accuracy of WB MRI in musculoskeletal oncology. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Skeletal-Axial, Skeletal-Appendicular, Soft Tissues/Skin, Bone Marrow, Extremities, Oncology, Musculoskeletal Imaging © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabela A N Cruz
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Laura M Fayad
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Henrique M Lederman
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Marcelo A C Nico
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Alípio G Ormond Filho
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Júlio Brandão Guimarães
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yan SY, Yang YW, Jiang XY, Hu S, Su YY, Yao H, Hu CH. Fat quantification: Imaging methods and clinical applications in cancer. Eur J Radiol 2023; 164:110851. [PMID: 37148843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Recently, the study of the relationship between lipid metabolism and cancer has evolved. The characteristics of intratumoral and peritumoral fat are distinct and changeable during cancer development. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue are also associated with cancer prognosis. In non-invasive imaging, fat quantification parameters such as controlled attenuation parameter, fat volume fraction, and proton density fat fraction from different imaging methods complement conventional images by providing concrete fat information. Therefore, measuring the changes of fat content for further understanding of cancer characteristics has been applied in both research and clinical settings. In this review, the authors summarize imaging advances in fat quantification and highlight their clinical applications in cancer precaution, auxiliary diagnosis and classification, therapy response monitoring, and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suo Yu Yan
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China
| | - Yi Wen Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China
| | - Xin Yu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China
| | - Su Hu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China
| | - Yun Yan Su
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China.
| | - Hui Yao
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China; Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China.
| | - Chun Hong Hu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney C, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ngozi Ekeke O, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis CJ, Mahal BA, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor OA, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023; 83:267-293. [PMID: 36494221 PMCID: PMC7614721 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel George
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher J Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krausewitz P, Ritter M, Essler M. [Diagnosis and staging of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 62:347-353. [PMID: 36735034 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02028-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has undergone significant changes in recent years in light of new therapies and innovative imaging. OBJECTIVES Established and innovative methods for detection of metastasis, risk group stratification, and treatment of mHSPC are outlined and compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS Background knowledge and treatment-relevant guideline recommendations on mHSPC are presented and complemented by recent study results. RESULTS Integration of modern imaging techniques, especially prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, into the diagnostic algorithm has the potential to significantly improve risk stratification and treatment of mHSPC. By using PSMA PET/CT, metastases are detected early and sensitively. This leads to the definition of new subgroups amenable to modern therapeutic strategies. The prognostic value of using PSMA PET/CT with regard to established risk categories in mHSPC is currently being evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Modern imaging, especially PSMA PET/CT, has significant added value for the diagnosis and treatment of mHSPC in almost all subgroups. In particular, it helps to select patients who will benefit from intensification or de-escalation of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Krausewitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn (AöR), Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn (AöR), Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Markus Essler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn (AöR), Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gravestock P, Somani BK, Tokas T, Rai BP. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031186. [PMID: 36769834 PMCID: PMC9918161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Radiotherapy to the Primary Tumor: The First Step of a Tailored Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12081981. [PMID: 36010331 PMCID: PMC9407309 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
15
|
Fournier L, de Geus-Oei LF, Regge D, Oprea-Lager DE, D’Anastasi M, Bidaut L, Bäuerle T, Lopci E, Cappello G, Lecouvet F, Mayerhoefer M, Kunz WG, Verhoeff JJC, Caruso D, Smits M, Hoffmann RT, Gourtsoyianni S, Beets-Tan R, Neri E, deSouza NM, Deroose CM, Caramella C. Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper. Front Oncol 2022; 11:800547. [PMID: 35083155 PMCID: PMC8784734 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.800547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 are currently the reference standard for evaluating efficacy of therapies in patients with solid tumours who are included in clinical trials, and they are widely used and accepted by regulatory agencies. This expert statement discusses the principles underlying RECIST, as well as their reproducibility and limitations. While the RECIST framework may not be perfect, the scientific bases for the anticancer drugs that have been approved using a RECIST-based surrogate endpoint remain valid. Importantly, changes in measurement have to meet thresholds defined by RECIST for response classification within thus partly circumventing the problems of measurement variability. The RECIST framework also applies to clinical patients in individual settings even though the relationship between tumour size changes and outcome from cohort studies is not necessarily translatable to individual cases. As reproducibility of RECIST measurements is impacted by reader experience, choice of target lesions and detection/interpretation of new lesions, it can result in patients changing response categories when measurements are near threshold values or if new lesions are missed or incorrectly interpreted. There are several situations where RECIST will fail to evaluate treatment-induced changes correctly; knowledge and understanding of these is crucial for correct interpretation. Also, some patterns of response/progression cannot be correctly documented by RECIST, particularly in relation to organ-site (e.g. bone without associated soft-tissue lesion) and treatment type (e.g. focal therapies). These require specialist reader experience and communication with oncologists to determine the actual impact of the therapy and best evaluation strategy. In such situations, alternative imaging markers for tumour response may be used but the sources of variability of individual imaging techniques need to be known and accounted for. Communication between imaging experts and oncologists regarding the level of confidence in a biomarker is essential for the correct interpretation of a biomarker and its application to clinical decision-making. Though measurement automation is desirable and potentially reduces the variability of results, associated technical difficulties must be overcome, and human adjudications may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Fournier
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Université de Paris, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Department of Radiology, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 970, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Daniele Regge
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela-Elena Oprea-Lager
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers [Vrije Universiteit (VU) University], Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Melvin D’Anastasi
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Medical Imaging Department, Mater Dei Hospital, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Luc Bidaut
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) – Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cappello
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Turin, Italy
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marius Mayerhoefer
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Damiano Caruso
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marion Smits
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Carl-Gustav-Carus Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sofia Gourtsoyianni
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Areteion Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- School For Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW) School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Neri
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, IL, United States
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Radiology Department, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph Centre International des Cancers Thoraciques, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lecouvet FE, Vekemans MC, Van Den Berghe T, Verstraete K, Kirchgesner T, Acid S, Malghem J, Wuts J, Hillengass J, Vandecaveye V, Jamar F, Gheysens O, Vande Berg BC. Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:59-80. [PMID: 34363522 PMCID: PMC8626399 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03841-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Bone imaging has been intimately associated with the diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma (MM) for more than 5 decades, as the presence of bone lesions indicates advanced disease and dictates treatment initiation. The methods used have been evolving, and the historical radiographic skeletal survey has been replaced by whole body CT, whole body MRI (WB-MRI) and [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow lesions and less frequent extramedullary plasmacytomas.Beyond diagnosis, imaging methods are expected to provide the clinician with evaluation of the response to treatment. Imaging techniques are consistently challenged as treatments become more and more efficient, inducing profound response, with more subtle residual disease. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT are the methods of choice to address these challenges, being able to assess disease progression or response and to detect "minimal" residual disease, providing key prognostic information and guiding necessary change of treatment.This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the WB-MRI and PET/CT techniques, their observations in responsive and progressive disease and their role and limitations in capturing minimal residual disease. It reviews trials assessing these techniques for response evaluation, points out the limited comparisons between both methods and highlights their complementarity with most recent molecular methods (next-generation flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing) to detect minimal residual disease. It underlines the important role of PET/MRI technology as a research tool to compare the effectiveness and complementarity of both methods to address the key clinical questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic E. Lecouvet
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Christiane Vekemans
- Haematology Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van Den Berghe
- Radiology Department, Universiteit Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Koenraad Verstraete
- Radiology Department, Universiteit Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Kirchgesner
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Souad Acid
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Malghem
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joris Wuts
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Avenue du Laerbeek 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Departement of Medicine, Myeloma Unit, Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Radiology Department, Katholieke Univesiteit Leuven, Oude Markt, 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - François Jamar
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bruno C. Vande Berg
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for lymph node and bone primary staging in prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:104.e17-104.e21. [PMID: 34911650 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for lymph nodes and bones in the primary stage of prostate cancer. METHODS A total of 126 patients who were submitted to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT from January 2016 to February 2019 for prostate cancer staging, detection of clinically significant lesions or active surveillance were included in this study. All studies were read by 2 experienced physicians (a nuclear physician and a radiologist). The reports were made in consensus and used by one of the authors to classify the exam in positive or negative. We evaluated presence of abnormal uptake in the prostate, lymph nodes, and bone. The reference standards were histopathological confirmation, confirmatory imaging exams and/or clinical follow-up showing lesion(s) regression after specific treatment, or typical osseous metastatic lesions and highly increased PSA levels. RESULTS Measurement of diagnostic performance indicated a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 75%, 96.3%, and 90.8%, respectively, for lymph node involvement, and 90.9%, 50%, and 76.5%, respectively for metastatic bone lesions. CONCLUSION This study showed high specificity and accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for lymph node and bone involvement in prostate cancer staging.
Collapse
|
18
|
Oprea-Lager DE, Cysouw MC, Boellaard R, Deroose CM, de Geus-Oei LF, Lopci E, Bidaut L, Herrmann K, Fournier LS, Bäuerle T, deSouza NM, Lecouvet FE. Bone Metastases Are Measurable: The Role of Whole-Body MRI and Positron Emission Tomography. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772530. [PMID: 34869009 PMCID: PMC8640187 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic tumor deposits in bone marrow elicit differential bone responses that vary with the type of malignancy. This results in either sclerotic, lytic, or mixed bone lesions, which can change in morphology due to treatment effects and/or secondary bone remodeling. Hence, morphological imaging is regarded unsuitable for response assessment of bone metastases and in the current Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST1.1) guideline bone metastases are deemed unmeasurable. Nevertheless, the advent of functional and molecular imaging modalities such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved the ability for follow-up of bone metastases, regardless of their morphology. Both these modalities not only have improved sensitivity for visual detection of bone lesions, but also allow for objective measurements of bone lesion characteristics. WB-MRI provides a global assessment of skeletal metastases and for a one-step "all-organ" approach of metastatic disease. Novel MRI techniques include diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) targeting highly cellular lesions, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for quantitative assessment of bone lesion vascularization, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) combining anatomical and functional sequences. Recommendations for a homogenization of MRI image acquisitions and generalizable response criteria have been developed. For PET, many metabolic and molecular radiotracers are available, some targeting tumor characteristics not confined to cancer type (e.g. 18F-FDG) while other targeted radiotracers target specific molecular characteristics, such as prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands for prostate cancer. Supporting data on quantitative PET analysis regarding repeatability, reproducibility, and harmonization of PET/CT system performance is available. Bone metastases detected on PET and MRI can be quantitatively assessed using validated methodologies, both on a whole-body and individual lesion basis. Both have the advantage of covering not only bone lesions but visceral and nodal lesions as well. Hybrid imaging, combining PET with MRI, may provide complementary parameters on the morphologic, functional, metabolic and molecular level of bone metastases in one examination. For clinical implementation of measuring bone metastases in response assessment using WB-MRI and PET, current RECIST1.1 guidelines need to be adapted. This review summarizes available data and insights into imaging of bone metastases using MRI and PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C.F. Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS – Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luc Bidaut
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Laure S. Fournier
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Radiology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederic E. Lecouvet
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Damme J, Tombal B, Collette L, Van Nieuwenhove S, Pasoglou V, Gérard T, Jamar F, Lhommel R, Lecouvet FE. Comparison of 68Ga-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET-CT) and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) with Diffusion Sequences (DWI) in the Staging of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215286. [PMID: 34771449 PMCID: PMC8582508 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Precise staging is key for the optimal management of advanced prostate cancer. PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI outperform standard imaging technology for staging high-risk prostate cancer, but direct comparison between both modalities is lacking. The primary endpoint of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of both techniques in the detection of lymph node, bone and visceral metastases against a best valuable comparator (BVC), defined as a consensus adjudication of all lesions on the basis of baseline and follow-up imaging, biological and clinical data and histopathologic confirmation when available. Knowing the diagnostic accuracy of both next generation imaging modalities might influence the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in prostate cancer by tailoring therapy. However, the impact on treatment and patient outcome of an improved detection of metastases has not been determined yet. Abstract Background: Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) outperform standard imaging technology for the detection of metastasis in prostate cancer (PCa). There are few direct comparisons between both modalities. This paper compares the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI for the detection of metastasis in PCa. One hundred thirty-four patients with newly diagnosed PCa (n = 81) or biochemical recurrence after curative treatment (n = 53) with high-risk features prospectively underwent PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI. The diagnostic accuracy of both techniques for lymph node, skeletal and visceral metastases was compared against a best valuable comparator (BVC). Overall, no significant difference was detected between PSMA PET-CT and WB-MRI to identify metastatic patients when considering lymph nodes, skeletal and visceral metastases together (AUC = 0.96 (0.92–0.99) vs. 0.90 (0.85–0.95); p = 0.09). PSMA PET-CT, however, outperformed WB-MRI in the subgroup of patients with newly diagnosed PCa for the detection of lymph node metastases (AUC = 0.96 (0.92–0.99) vs. 0.86 (0.79–0.92); p = 0.0096). In conclusion, PSMA PET-CT outperforms WB-MRI for the detection of nodal metastases in primary staging of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Van Damme
- Department of Urology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (J.V.D.); (B.T.)
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Department of Urology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (J.V.D.); (B.T.)
| | - Laurence Collette
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), B-1341 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium;
| | - Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
| | - Vassiliki Pasoglou
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
| | - Thomas Gérard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - François Jamar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - Renaud Lhommel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-MIRO), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (T.G.); (F.J.); (R.L.)
| | - Frédéric E. Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC-IMAG), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium; (S.V.N.); (V.P.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Radtke JP, Schimmöller L. [Is contrast medium essential in the initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of prostate cancer?]. Urologe A 2021; 60:238-240. [PMID: 33506287 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01445-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J P Radtke
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, AöR, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland.
- Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - L Schimmöller
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|